Tag: Dasuki

  • ‘Dasuki admitted keeping arms, ammunition at home’

    ‘Dasuki admitted keeping arms, ammunition at home’

    Trial opened yesterday in the case against former National Security Adviser Sambo Dasuki, with an operative of the Department of State Security Service (DSS), Samuel Ogbu confirming that the defendant admitted keeping arms and ammunitions in his private residence.

    Ogbu said although one needs license from the appropriate quarters to keep arms, Dasuki failed to produce any license authorising him to keep the arms and ammunition recovered from his house.

    Dasuki is facing charges for unlawful possession of firearms and ammunition, and money laundering before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Ogbu, who is the first prosecution witness, told the court how the team he worked with interviewed Dasuki and obtained statement from him in the comfort of his home on July 17, 2015.

    Led in evidence by Dipo Okpeseyi (SAN), Ogbu said a team of DSS investigators that searched the ex-NSA’s private home in Asokoro, Abuja, recovered five Tavor rifles, one Lugar rifle, one micro Uzi rifle, various categories of ammunition and cash in both local and foreign currencies.

    He said Dasuki admitted, in his written statement, that the arms and ammunition belonged to the Office of the NSA and were for the use of his security detail. He said Dasuki added that the items would be returned at the end of the day, but failed to say when.

    Ogbu, who said he has been in service at the DSS for 34 years, described the Tavor rifle as a controlled weapon, which is only assigned to trained and disciplined individuals because of its effect.

    His words: “On the said date, July 17, 2015, I joined other investigators, who went to the private residence of the defendant. On arrival, he took us into his house and made a special choice where we were to conduct the interview.

    “We set up our recording equipment, cautioned him and told him the interview would be recorded. Once he accepted that he should be interviewed, I informed him there were three areas the interview would cover – the arms and ammunition, the cash, and the vehicles recovered from his private residence.

    “He went through the list of the items as contained in the search warrant. We began with the arms and ammunitions recovered. They were five Tavor rifles, one Lugar rifle, one Micro Uzi rifle and various categories of ammunitions.”

    The witness said his team of interviewers was dispatched to Dasuki’s house based on the report the search team submitted to the service. He said before the interview, Dasuki’s private residence and his guest house at No 46 Mandela Street, Asokoro, were.

    “The interview was recorded and he also made voluntary written statement. The recording was done with a movable recording device. An official, who has the knowledge, set the device for the recording and while he wrote his written statement, it was also recorded. I have a disk recording of the interview.

    “After asking questions on the arms and ammunitions, we also interviewed him on the monies recovered from his residence. We also interviewed him on the various vehicles recovered from his private residence,” the witness added.

    The statement the witness said he wrote and submitted to his office about his team’s mission in Dasuki’s house and Dasuki’s written statements were admitted in evidence as exhibits “DSS1” and “DSS2.”

    When asked to describe the brand of riffle called Tavor, the witness said: “it is one of the most dangerous rifles; we have similar ones in the service (DSS). They were imported because of the works on terrorism. We discovered that the terrorists were using the usual rifles like AK47. So the government decided to import this so that we can have an edge over them.

    “It is one of the most dangerous; a shot from this rifle can cause a stampede in the whole of Maitama; its impact is extremely devastating. You can have 100 or more rounds in two magazines of the rifle for a single assignment. The rapidity of discharging is fantabulous.

    “Those who know it know that it is very, very efficient. You do not toy with it. In a second, it can discharge about 50 rounds. Before you use a Tavor, you must be well-trained and disciplined because of the danger it poses,” he said.

    On when such weapons are issued out, the witness said: “It all depends on the kind of operation, for special operations. The weapons are kept in an armoury of the service and can only be issued with written permission. The issuing authority is the Director-General of the DSS.”

    The witness said it is not to his knowledge that the weapon was ever issued to the defendant. He added that Tavor rifle cannot be issued to an individual that do not have the written permission of the DG.

    “To the best of my knowledge, it cannot be imported by any individual lawfully.

    It is only the Federal Government that can import this calibre of rifle. DSS cannot issue this kind of rifle to private security guard or mai-guard. If issued lawfully, it can be kept outside the armoury. But when not on assignment, it is kept safe in the armoury.

    “To my knowledge, the DSS did not issue the defendant with Tavor rifles. To the best of my knowledge, I do not know if the defendant’s guards were issued Tavor rifles. It is illegal for a man issued with a Tavor rifle to give it to someone else to use.

    “The second item is Lugar rifle. My service does not use this type of weapon, to the best of my knowledge. The third is Micro-Uzi. It is used in my service because of its efficacy. It is a controlled weapon. You have to be licensed or be in service to use the weapon. Item four constituted various categories of live ammunitions.

    “The defendant did not show us any authority or license to carry any of these weapons. He also did not show us any license to store live ammunitions in his house.

    The defendant confirmed to us that these arms and ammunitions were recovered in his house,” he said.

    Under cross-examination by Dasuki’s lawyer, Ahmed Raji (SAN), Ogbu said the evidence he gave about the allocation of arms and how they were issue were mainly as it related to the DSS. He said for his 34 years, he had only served in DSS and not any other security agencies.

    He said he would not know if any other agency issued Dasuki license to keep the arms and ammunition.

    The witness was later given the statement by Dasuki and was asked to read the first sentence, from which he read where Dasuki said: “The Tavor rifle belong to the ONSA, and they are used by my security detail and will be returned at the end of the day.”

    Ogbu said the search on the defendant’s property and the interview his (the witness’) team conducted, were all done when Dasuki was no longer the NSA.

    When asked whether he knew that Dasuki’s house was searched barely 48 hours after he was sacked, the witness said: “All I know is that the ex-NSA was no longer in service when his house was searched. When you leave service, you hand over everything.”

    He added that the searches in Dasuki houses were with search warrant. And that it was the practice by DSS that every search, particularly of high profile individuals, was always done with search warrant.

    He said he know that the defendant is entitled to security after leaving office, but did not know the number of personnel he is entitled to.

    Earlier, the trial judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola refused an application by Dasuki for stay of proceedings pending the determination of a motion he filed before the Court of Appeal, Abuja for that purpose.

    Justice Ademola rejected Raji’s argument that the ruling of the Supreme Court on November 12, 2015 in the appeal by Senate President, Bukola Saraki , which granted stay of proceedings in Saraki’s trial  before the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) was applicable to the Dasuki case.

    The judge upheld the argument by Okpeseyi that by the provision of Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) stay of proceedings was not allowed in criminal trial.

    Trial resumes today.

  • Dasuki kept arms, ammunitions at home – Witness

    Dasuki kept arms, ammunitions at home – Witness

    Trial opened on Wednesday in the case involving a former National Security Adviser, Sambo Dasuki, with an operative of the Department of State Security Service (DSS), Samuel Ogbu, saying the defendant admitted that he kept arms and ammunitions in his private residence.

    Ogbu said although one needs a license from appropriate quarters to keep arms in the country, Dasuki failed to produce any license authorising him to keep the arms and ammunitions recovered from his house.

    Dasuki is standing trial for unlawful possession of firearms and ammunitions, and money laundering before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Ogbu, who is the first prosecution witness, told the court how the team he worked with interviewed Dasuki and obtained statement from him in the comfort of his home on July 17, 2015.

    The witness, led in evidence by Dipo Okpeseyi (SAN), said a team of DSS investigators that searched the ex-NSA’s private home in Asokoro, Abuja, recovered five Tavor rifles, one Lugar rifle, one micro Uzi rifle, various categories of ammunitions and cash in both local and foreign currencies.

    He said Dasuki admitted, in his written statement, that the arms and ammunition recovered in his house belong to the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) and were for the use of his security detail.

    He said the ex-NSA promised that the items would be returned at the end of the day, but failed to say the day.

     

  • Jonathan approved payment of N400m to Metuh – Okupe

    Jonathan approved payment of N400m to Metuh – Okupe

    A former Senior Special Assistant on Public Affairs to ex- President Goodluck Jonathan, Dr. Doyin Okupe, said on Wednesday that the ex-president approved the payment of N400 million to Olisa Metuh.

    Okupe stated this while testifying in the trial of Metuh before a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Metuh, the National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), is standing trial for allegedly receiving N400 million from Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA).

    The prosecution claimed that the fund was collected through the defendant’s company Destra Investment Limited.

    However, the defence witness said the approval of Metuh’s proposal and immediate payment of the project fund was given by the former president in November 2014.

    “Sometime in November 2014, some members of the cabinet and party members were called for a crucial meeting with the President where issues of great national importance were discussed.

    “I remember vividly that on that fateful day, Chief Metuh presented a proposal to the President immediately after the meeting.

    “The President also gave approval for the payment of N400 million to Metuh,’’ Okupe said.

    Okupe added that the money was to be used for enhancement of Jonathan’s negative public perception before the 2015 general election.

    He said as the leader of the PDP and its presidential candidate, the ex- President enjoyed tremendous goodwill, saying that several actions were to support the PDP.

    According to Okupe, such goodwill was demonstrated at the fund raising ceremony organised at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, before the election, in which about N21 billion was raked in.

    “I am therefore surprised to hear that the Office of the National Security Adviser was used to distribute money for Jonathan’s presidential campaign.

    “However, the President could also use his tremendous goodwill to source funds to assist his party or help to execute special programmes.

    “Besides, as the candidate for election, the President has immense capacity to raise funds as a candidate. He did not use any government establishment as his pseudo-sponsor,’’ the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) quoted the former presidential aide as saying at the hearing.

  • FG to explain reasons for Dasuki’s detention

    FG to explain reasons for Dasuki’s detention

    The Federal Government will on Thursday explain why a former National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki, is still in detention.

    The Nation gathered on Tuesday that the state intends to utilise the opportunity granted it by the Community Court of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to call oral evidence for that purpose.

    The ECOWAS Court on Tuesday granted the government’s request to lead oral evidence in the fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by Dasuki.

    Justice Friday Nwoke, who presided over a three-man bench, ordered Dasuki to present his case on Wednesday, while the government will file its defence on Thursday.

    Lawyer to the federal government, Tajani Ganzali, in his application to lead oral evidence, told the court the state intends to make public, the alleged atrocities committed by Dasuki while in office.

    He said the state will call “insiders” who will give details of what happened under Dasuki and why the federal government cannot grant him freedom for now.

    Justice Nwoke said: “Having listened to parties in this matter and the parties having filed and put all necessary documents and exhibits at the disposal of this court, and having granted accelerated hearing in this matter, it is in the interest of justice that this case must be expeditiously dealt with.

    “In this regard, the plaintiff is hereby ordered to make out his case on Wednesday, May 18 and the defendant to ventilate its defense the following day, May 19, after which we will adjourn for judgment.”

  • Okupe: Dasuki paid monthly for the running of my office

    A former Senior Special Assistant on Public Affairs to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, Dr. Doyin Okupe, has revealed that his office was funded monthly by the office of the embattled former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.).

    Okupe served under Jonathan from 2012 to 2015. He said this on his official Twitter handle.

    “I was not paid arms deal money.NSA paid for the  running of my office monthly from Aug 2012.Dasuki gate was in 2014.I Did not take part in campaign,” he said.

     

  • Dasuki’s absence in court stalls trial

    Dasuki’s absence in court stalls trial

    The scheduled commencement of trial in one of the cases involving the former National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) was stalled on Tuesday due to Dasuki’s absence in court.

    Dasuki is named in three charges pending before Justices Husseini Baba-Yusuf and Peter Affen of the High Court of the FCT in Maitama and Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    ‎He was arraigned alongside four others before Justice Baba-Yusuf in December last year on a 19-count charge in which they were, among others, accused of diverting about‎ N32bn arms procurement fund.

    Also named in the charge are former Director of Finance and Administration in the office of the NSA, Shuaibu Salisu‎ and  a former director in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Aminu Baba Kusa and two of his companies – Acacia Holdings Limited and Reliance Referral Hospital Limited.

    It had been impossible for the prosecution to commence trial in the case since the defendants were arraigned due to a motion filed by Dasuki, seeking to stop his trial because of Federal Government’s purported violation of an order admitting him to bail.

    The court had on February 8 dismissed Dasuki’s motion and fixed March 23 for commencement of trial.

     

  • Will the Dasuki and Saraki cases still be undecided one year from now? The call for a special anti-corruption tribunal by Justice Oguntade and others to the rescue!

    Will the Dasuki and Saraki cases still be undecided one year from now? The call for a special anti-corruption tribunal by Justice Oguntade and others to the rescue!

    [An open letter to AGF Malami]

    Honourable Minister:

    If you read the open letter that I wrote to CJN Mahmud Mohammed in this column last week, you will immediately recognize that, in a slightly different formulation, the question that is the first part of the title of this open letter to you is the same question that I posed to the CJN at the very end of this column last week. As a matter of fact, permit me to quote the question in the exact formulation in which I directed it to the CJN last week: “To take the cases of Dasuki and Saraki as the most (in)famous of all the cases in the law courts right now, will these cases still be undecided a year, two, three or four years from now, your lordship?” Why am I directing basically the same question to YOU?

    Honourable Minister, you and CJN Mohammed are the most important judicial officers in the land; consequently, what will happen one way or another in the resolution of the war on corruption in our law courts will depend on what you and the sitting CJN do or don’t do. Right now, it does not appear that both of you see eye to eye and are willing to cooperate to ensure that justice is done in the high profile corruption cases. As I said in my letter to the CJN last week, his lordship has recently been making statements of displeasure at what he considers interference with the independence of the judiciary and the rule of the law, statements that were clearly directed at you and President Buhari. This probably arose from the fact that your good self and the President have also been making statements expressing great concern that some highly influential forces in the Bar and the Bench are hell-bent to sabotage the government’s prosecution of alleged looters in our law courts. Indeed, as I am sure you are well aware, there is now a clear division in the bar of public opinion between commentators and pundits who side with you and the President and those who take the side of the CJN.This development is at the heart of the reason why I am writing this open letter to you in the same manner in which I wrote that open letter to the CJN last week, indeed addressing the same basic question to both of you. Before taking up this central issue, permit me to make a comment that might startle you and many of those reading this piece.

    Honourable Minister, President Buhari is not a lawyer, he is not a member of the legal profession. You are. Apart from his political experience as a ruler – military and now civilian – the President’sreal profession, his true vocation is that of a soldier. The kind of “war” he was professionally trained for is military warfare, not legal skirmishes and battles. This is why when as a military ruler he launched a “war” on corruption, the tactics, the means that he used were militaristic. Parenthetically, let me observe here that for the most part they were fairly effective and most Nigerians at the time greatly applauded both the tactics and the results.But even then, with all his popularity at the time, Buhari had opponents that deeply resented his use of those militaristic tactics and means to wage his “war” on corruption. It is precisely this kind of commentators and pundits that arecurrently rising up in arms against the President, now that he is an elected, civilian president who has taken off his military fatigues and donned his babariga. Absolutely without any evidence for their claims, some of these pundits have gone as far as to see a creeping move toward totalitarian destruction of the rule of law in the President’s justified anger at the obstacles being mounted against the successful prosecution of alleged looters in the law courts. On his part, the President has been completely indifferent to such charges – as well he should since, in my opinion, they are completely baseless if not indeed mischievous and cynically opportunistic. At any rate, this is where YOU, Honourable Minister, come in, as both the Attorney General of the Federation and the President’s chief legal adviser.

    Here, I must be completely frank with you, Honourable Minister, inexpressing my disappointment at the fact that if the President himself has not cared to give clear explanations for his disdain, his anger with forces intent on sabotaging the war against corruption in our law courts, why have YOU been silent, why haven’t you explained carefully to the nation and the world what exactly is going on? More specifically, why haven’t you taken issue with the near total disregard for the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 (ACJA) by most of the magistrates and judges presiding over the trials of the alleged looters? You are the chief law officer of the land, Honourable Minister; it should be of great concern to YOU of all people that the effective law of the land in the administration of criminal justice is being massively disregarded in the law courts trying the alleged looters. Permit me to give a short illustration of what I am saying here.

    Clause 306 and clause 396 of ACJA are pretty clear and unambiguous in the manner in which they have effectively done away with the use of frivolous and obfuscatory injunctions and stay of proceedings to unduly prolong the trials of the alleged looters. Indeed, taken as a whole and applied as required by law, ACJA has reduced the length of the trial of any and all criminal cases in our country to less than one year, inclusive of appeals all the way to the high court. [Let us note here, for the benefit of the cynical journalistic defenders of the human and legal rights of the looters, that this time span is consistent with standard practice in most countries of the world] Already, we are in the tenth month of the life of Buhari’s administration and NONE of the cases in court is anywhere close to resolution one way or another. This the basis of my question to you and the CJN: a year, two years, three or four years from now, will the legal battles over Dasukigate still be in the courts, given the fact that if the provisions of ACJA were being applied some of these cases would be near resolution by now? And so I repeat, Honourable Minister: why the hell have you been so silent, so unimaginably indecisive in the face of the widespread disregard for ACJA in the law courts?

    As I am not unaware or unmindful of the tone of this open letter, let me explain its cause to you, Honourable Minister. Moreover, this is something that every person reading this piece should carefully consider: even if ACJA was being faithfully and diligently applied in the law courts, the backlog of cases going back to more than a decade and half is so vast that many cases would still be around years from now. Add to this the fact that the anti-graft agencies are uncovering new cases every day and dragging new defendants to the courts all the time. For a judiciary that is already overwhelmingly predisposed to prolongations and deferments of cases, this is like a bonanza, a perfect alibi. All they have to say is, can’t you see that we are helpless before the sheer weight of the multitude of cases piling up to the high heavens? And indeed, the magistrates, the judges and the born-again fundamentalist defenders of the legal and human rights of looters have precisely been saying this, shouting it to the rooftops of our national public opinion edifice.However, what remains buried beneath this cacophony is the extraordinary fact that a recommendation actually exists in the recent legal history of our country that a special anti-corruption tribunal beset up exclusively to try the sort of prosecutions that the anti-graft agencies are taking to the regular law courts almost on a daily basis now. What does this mean?

    As I have pointed out before on the pages of this column, in the Jonathan National Conference of 2014 (JNC 2014), the Committee on Law, Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Reforms headed by Justice Adesola George Oguntade, a retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, made a recommendation that only a special tribunal separate from the regular law courts could successfully meet the legal, administrative, human and moral challenges that corruption poses both to our judiciary and our country. Let it be known that the recommendation had the unanimous support of all the members of the committee. I draw your attention, Honourable Minister, as well as the attention of everyone reading this piece to the fact that Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, President of the Nigerian Bar Association, 2006-2008, a highly respected senior advocate and generally regarded as a progressive and enlightened legal luminary among our most influential lawyers, was a member of that committee that made this unanimous recommendation. I mention this fact because Olisa Agbakoba is saying completely different things today about what is happening or not happening in the law courts in the trials of the looters. I think, indeed, I suggest that the question should be put to Agbakoba now whether or not he is still in favour of the urgent need to set up this special anti-corruption tribunal. But far beyond the individual case of Mr. Agbakoba, Honourable Minister, YOU also have to let the nation know where YOU stand on the matter of this recommendation. For let this be clearly understood: if it is not implemented, not even full and vigorous implementation of ACJA can ensure that a year, two years, three or four years from now many cases will not still be lingering in the law courts.

    I end on a positive, hopeful note, Honourable Minister. Six months from now, in a future issue of this column, I will write you an open letter again, confident that things will be much different then. For me, three crucial things are at stake in the current war against corruption in our law courts. First: the stolen loot MUST be recovered and what is recovered must be transformed into economic and social dividends that will bring significant relief to the hardship and suffering of the vast majority of the looted and the downtrodden of our society. Secondly, the guilty must be punished in accordance with scale of their crimes. When the Russian writer, Fyodor Dostoevsky, wrote his famous novel, Crime and Punishment, the crime went with the punishment and vice versa; for if the crime is dissociated from the punishment, the society will lag for a long, long time in a state of moral and spiritual darkness. Thirdly, our judiciary needs deep and wide-ranging reforms; the historic occasion of the ongoing legal battles against the alleged looters in our law courts provides a unique foundational moment for these reforms. You and CJN Mohammed have a large, collaborative role to play in this reform agenda.

    Yours in the service of the nation and its looted majority,

    Biodun Jeyifo                                                                                                         bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Court to Fed Govt: let Dasuki have access to his lawyer

    Court to Fed Govt: let Dasuki have access to his lawyer

    A High Court sitting in the the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja yesterday gave an order that former National Security Adviser (NSA) Mohammed Sambo Dasuki be allowed to  have access to  his lawyer Joseph Daudu (SAN) from Monday to Friday during working hours.

    Justice Husseini Baba-Yusuf said this would enable Dasuki defend himself on the charges brought against him.

    The judge made the order following complains by Daudu that he was not granted access to his client.

    The ex-NSA is being tried before Justice Baba-Yusuf with former Director of Finance and Administration in the office of the NSA, Shuaibu Salisu and Dalhatu Investment Limited on a 22-count charge for allegedly looting about N13 billion public funds.

    He urged the court to either quash the charges or halt proceedings indefinitely until he was released from detention.

    At yesterday’s hearing, Daudu said he was not yet ready for trial, adding that he only met his client in court.

    He appealed for an adjournment.

    He said: “We are not asking for an adjournment just for adjournment sake. Perhaps if the prosecution did not flout the orders of the court, we would have finished this case long time ago.

    “My lord, in this instance, the requirement is much more fundamental and for the counsel to do their work, they must be in a position to have access to materials because of the need to utilise them. And let me make this clear that I never conspired with Dasuki to be absent from court on March 23.”

    But the prosecution counsel, Adebiyi Adebisi, disagreed with Dasuki’s counsel, saying the application for adjournment has no basis.

    He said no substantial reason was given on why the case must be adjourned.

    Adeniyi said: “The application for adjournment is illegal as it is contrary to the spirit of the Criminal Prosecution Act. There is no concrete evidence your lordship can rely on to say that anybody ever made attempt to see the first defendant and was refused.

    “My lord, disregard the application for adjournment so that this trial can continue.”

    He reminded the court that the Department of State Services (DSS) said they had never received any request for access from anybody.

    The case was adjourned to May 3 for continuation.

  • Presidential panel indicts over 300 contractors, army officers

    The Presidential committee set up to probe contracts awarded by the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) from 2011 to 2015 has indicted more than 300 companies and prominent citizens

    Serving and retired officers of the armed forces were also indicted by the committee.

    According to a statement by the Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, over N7 Billion has been recovered from the indicted companies and individuals.

    Another N41 Billion is to be refunded by the indicted companies, while further investigation by the EFCC has been ordered to determine whether another N75 Billion should be recovered from some of the companies for unexecuted or partially executed contracts.

    The committee also established that one of the indicted companies, Societe D’Equipment International was overpaid to the tune of 7.9 Million Euros and $7.09 Million.

    The committee which is different from the one investigating the Defence Arms and Equipment Procurement, discovered that there was a total disregard of salient provisions of the Public Procurement Act in the award of contracts by ONSA.

    It also noted that several contractors were apparently over paid, while others were given full upfront payments contrary to their contract terms and agreements in force.

    The panel also uncovered evidence of payments to individuals and companies by ONSA without any contractual agreement or evidence of jobs executed.

    The committee further discovered that some companies failed to meet up their tax obligations for contracts executed.

  • Dasuki: I’m not coming to court

    Dasuki: I’m not coming to court

    Former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Dasuki yesterday refused to appear in court for his trial.

    His absence stalled his trial at a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Abuja.

    Dasuki, Shuaibu Salisu, a former NSA Director of Finance, and Aminu Baba-Kusa, a former Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) Executive Director, have been arraigned for alleged diversion of N13.6 billion meant for purchase of arms.

    The other defendants are Acacia Holding Limited and Reliance Referral Hospital Limited.

    At yesterday’s hearing, prosecuting counsel Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) said  Dauski refused to come to the court because his lead counsel would be absent.

    Jacobs said he persuaded him to come but he said “unless you abduct me, I am not coming’’.

    Citing Sections 267(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, he said it was a deliberate effort made by the first defendant and his counsel not to appear in court.

    However, Mr Wale Balogun, holding brief for Mr Joseph Dauda (SAN), told the court that it was the duty of the prosecution to produce the first defendant in court.

    He said the prosecuting counsel did not produce affidavit evidence before the court as for why he could not produce the first defendant.

    Olakayode Dada, Mr Solomon Umoh (SAN), Dr Abiodun Layoun (SAN) and Mr Olajide Ayodele, counsel for second to fifth defendants, aligned themselves with Balogun’s submission.

    Justice Husseni Baba-Yusuf adjourned till April 6 for continuation.