Tag: Data

  • Skye9 launches low data movie app

    Skye9 launches low data movie app

    With a quest to build a data-friendly application where movie lovers can easily download and stream movies on the go, the Skye9 Show Concept has launched Skye9 Movie Application.

    The application is available for downloads on several app stores and is compatible with a wide array of devices, PCs, and digital TVs, enables users to download and stream movies online, according to its founders.

    According to the Country Manager, Ayo Odusolu, Skye9 Movies is set to redefine the entertainment landscape and create a viable and preferred option across the world especially for Nigerians at home and in the Diaspora

    “Skye9 movies will continually strive to provide subscribers with affordable access to various Nollywood movies, wherever they are in the world at home or on the go, via an internet connected computer, tablet or mobile. Our primary focus is to make our rich Nollywood content as easily accessible as possible at a price that is truly affordable,” he said.

    Odusola also added that the Skye9 app has contents are that exclusive to the application alone “Yes we have exclusive contents some you’ve never seen anywhere in fact you won’t see them anywhere else. 2017, I guarantee you we also have current and old movies that are still exclusive. We also have old contents that you may have seen but peoples still want to see them that are also available on our platform. Skye9 commissions producers to produce movies for us and its completely owned by Skye9.”

    Downloads on the app are however safe and secure but not transferrable, he said, explaining that Skye9 Movies operates a subscription business model where users can access Nollywood movies via an Android App and iOS App and via the World Wide Webb affording people the choice to really watch anything, anytime and anywhere as long as they are subscribers.

  • Over 22 politically exposed persons, businessmen in Dubai under surveillance

    Over 22 politically exposed persons, businessmen in Dubai under surveillance

    Fresh facts emerged yesterday that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has received a database of Nigerians with assets in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    On the list are assets suspected to have been acquired with looted funds by some former governors, ex- ministers, bankers, oil chiefs,  government functionaries and other Politically Exposed Persons(PEPs).

    The EFCC is analysing the database in line with its list of PEPs who are being investigated.

    The anti-graft agency has placed over 22 politically exposed persons and businessmen in Dubai under surveillance.

    Funds linked with some of those under probe may be seized.

    A source in the commission, who spoke in confidence, said: “In line with its Beneficial Ownership laws, we have already a database of Nigerians with assets in the United Arab Emirates, including properties of some high-profile Nigerians under investigation.

    “We are already studying the database in line with our ongoing investigation and profiling. We have a long list of some politically exposed persons and businessmen under probe.

    “The signing of the agreements between Nigeria and the UAE by President Muhammadu Buhari last week has opened a robust vista which will hasten our identification and attachment of the suspicious assets.

    “It is time to set out for work. You will recall that over N1.34 trillion was stolen by public officers in seven years. We will trace some of these funds and the assets acquired with them in UAE.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “We will not release the list now but already we have initiated action on some suspects.

    “Actually, there is no hiding place for any looter from Nigeria in UAE again. In May 2016 at the Anti-corruption Summit in London, the UAE joined the league of 29 nations which will share where lists of beneficial owners.

    “The UAE has also strengthened its anti-money laundering (‘AML’) regulations. Therefore, the environment is conducive now to track the suspects on our radar.

    “The Jebel Ali Free Zone Authority (JAFZA) also operates a commercial register where you can easily identify companies and investors in UAE.”

    Following a state visit to the UAE by President Muhammadu Buhari on January 19, last year, the Federal Government entered into  six agreements with the Emirates.

    The agreements, which were signed by Buhari last week, are:

    • Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement.
    • Agreement on Trade Promotion and Protection
    • Judicial Agreements on Extradition
    • Transfer of Sentenced Persons
    • Mutual Legal Assistance on Criminal Matters
    • Mutual Legal Assistance on Criminal and Commercial Matters(recovery and repatriation of stolen wealth)

    Sections 7 of 28 and 34 of the EFCC (Establishment Act) 2004 and Section 13(1) of the Federal High Court Act, 2004 mandate the agency to seize suspicious assets.

    Section 7 says: “The commission has power to (a) cause any investigations to be conducted as to whether any person, corporate body or organization has committed any offence under this Act or other law relating to economic and financial crimes.

    “(b) Cause investigations to be conducted into the properties of any person if it appears to the commission that the person’s lifestyle and extent of the properties are not justified by his source of income.”

    Sections 28 and 34 of the EFCC (Establishment Act) 2004 and Section 13(1) of the Federal High Court Act, 2004 empower the anti-graft agency to invoke Interim Assets Forfeiture Clause.

    “Section 28 of the EFCC Act reads: ‘Where a person is arrested for an offence under this Act, the Commission shall immediately trace and attach all the assets and properties of the person acquired as a result of such economic or financial crime and shall thereafter cause to be obtained an interim attachment order from the Court.’

    Section 13 of the Federal High Court Act reads in part: “The Court may grant an injunction or appoint a receiver by an interlocutory order in all cases in which it appears to the Court to be just or convenient so to do.

    (2)          Any such order may be made either unconditionally or on such terms and conditions as the Court thinks just.”

    The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign and Domestic Debts, Senator Shehu Sani said over $200 billion had been hidden in the UAE.

    He said: “Over $200 billion is stashed away from Nigeria to Dubai alone. This may be the monies stolen since in the past 20 years. I am not talking about estates and bonds and other securities bought with Nigeria stolen money.”

    The anti-money laundering policy of UAE Central Bank reads in part: “Any person who commits, or attempts to commit, a Money Laundering offence shall be punished by imprisonment of up to 10 years and or a fine of between AED 100,000 and AED 500,000.

    ”In cases of multiple perpetrators, the Court subject to its discretion, may exempt a perpetrator from the imprisonment penalty if he takes the initiative and reports the crime to the competent authorities prior to the knowledge of such authorities and if his actions lead to the arrest of the other perpetrators or seizure of the laundered money.

    ”Any establishment that commits an offence of money laundering, financing of terrorism or financing of any unlawful organizations, shall be punished by a fine of AED 300,000 and AED 1,000,000.

    ”Failure to report a suspicious transaction shall be punishable by imprisonment and /or a fine of between AED 50,000 and AED 300,000.

    ”Tipping off a person being investigated regarding a suspicious transaction shall be punishable by imprisonment of up to one year and/ or a fine of between AED10,000 and AED 100,000.

    ”Violation of the requirements of Airport Declarations shall be punishable by imprisonment and or a fine.”

  • FIRS, others share data of high income earners

    FIRS, others share data of high income earners

    The Joint Tax Board (JTB) and the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) have started sharing data of high net worth individuals to profile income earners and taxpayers and get them to pay appropriate taxes.

    Twelve states have signed the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) under the Voluntary Assets and Income Declaration Scheme (VAIDS).

    The JTB also announced yesterday that it had hired a consultant to ensure that the databases of states’ tax authorities and the FIRS speak to each other.

    The integration of data will help data sharing among states, improve compliance and tax revenue.

    Executive Chairman of FIRS and JTB, Mr. Tunde Fowler, announced the MoU with states on VAIDS in Abuja at JTB’s 138th meeting.

    He said the integration of data among states between FIRS and JTB would help to identify high net-worth individuals, track their tax status and compliance. He announced that there are no untouchables as regards the implementation of VAIDS

    Fowler said that the Federal Government has demonstrated an uncommon political will to entrench tax compliance in Nigeria, saying issues of taxation are taking a centre stage in the country.

    ”Speaking on behalf of the FIRS and the JTB, I want to assure you that we have received the blessing and political will of Mr. President, the Acting President to implement VAIDS.

    ”The Executive is behind us, the Senate, the House of Reps, are behind us and the Judiciary is behind us. The government is behind us. It is now left for us to perform our duties in the right and best way.

    ”A lot of special things are happening to the country. We are changing the financial profile of the country and of course, taxation is in the forefront. I can’t recall any time in the past when we had had such integration and cooperation. Our vision is to ensure that the governments, at all levels have enough resources to provide essential facilities to everyone. We are also moving away from taxes based solely on oil—that are not predictable to non-oil taxes”.

    ‘I am Happy to announce that at no time in the history of the FIRS have states and JTB have enjoyed this level of collaboration that we are enjoying today. Collaboration is important. States cannot be said to be doing well if the FIRS is not doing well.  In the same vein, FIRS cannot be said to be doing well if states are not doing well.

    ”Between 25th and 29th September 2017, the African Tax Administration Forum, ATAF will be meeting in Abuja. Leaders of tax authorities will be in attendance. Many will come with their ministers. We believe that collaboration between heads of tax authorities and Ministers of Finance is healthy for tax work. We will encourage them to come.

    ”In the same vein, we expect that all of you (Chairmen of State Internal Revenue Services) will be in attendance and at least one other person—possibly your commissioner of Finance.

    At the enlarged meeting of the JTB, convened mainly to discuss stakeholders’ implementation of VAIDS, the body ratified the election Chief Oseni Elamah, former Chairman of Edo State Board of Internal Revenue, as the new Executive Secretary of JTB.

    Mr. Elamah takes over from Mr. Mohammed Lawal Abubakar, a Director with the FIRS, who has led the JTB Secretariat for seven years.

    Fowler thanked the JTB members for their activities on the Tax Thursday and further urged them to put more efforts in observing the weekly tax education programme.

     

     

     

  • Edo to generate data for planning

    Edo to generate data for planning

    Edo State Governor Godwin Obaseki has said his administration has begun the generation of Geographic Information System (GIS) data for urban planning and development.

    The governor, who spoke in Benin when he received executive members of the Edo State chapter of Nigerian Institute of Town Planners (NITP), who visited him, said the government had awarded contract for the generation of GIS data, to be used by the end of the first quarter of 2018 for modern urban planning.

    He said bids would be opened to international organisations for investment in the planning and building of cities in the state to compete with major cities in the world.

    Obaseki said going by the emphasis his administration placed on urban planning, the Ministry of Lands had been separated from the Ministry of Urban and Regional Planning.

    He said his administration would work with town planners to develop the state, particularly in the utilisation of the GIS data.

    NITP Chairman Mr. Nosa Iyamu said the institute was established 51 years ago to advance town and country planning.

    He said the institute, over the years, made suggestions to administrations on how to correct anomalies in physical development.

    Iyamu enjoined the governor to preserve Benin Walls and Moat, as they were historical monuments of the Bini people.

  • Double registration: INEC under pressure to swap data, says blogger

    •Govt: allegations baseless and unfounded

    Renowned blogger, Comrade Austin Okai, has accused Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello of attempting to swap the computer used in his double voter registration saga.

    Okai, who spoke during Eid in Lokoja, called for an overhaul of INEC workers in Kogi to stem further manipulations.

    He maintained that the governor is running around to repair his image, following global condemnation of his double registration.

    His words: “The current impasse on Governor Yahaya Bello’s double registration is a pointer to the lack of confidence in INEC, both in Kogi and the headquarters, in future elections. I urge INEC to replace all card readers meant for kogi elections in the future.”

    Okai added that the investigative panel compounded the scenario with their plans to swap the laptop used for the registration.

    According to him, the data on the laptop was deleted and the Electoral Officer, Mr. Ajani, brought another for scrutiny.

    Okai challenged INEC to request for the laptops in Lokoja council and recall the HOD ICT and VOTER Registry, the accountant and Administrative Secretary, whose complicity is obvious through inducement from the government, for investigation.

    But Governor Bello, through his Director General on Media and Publicity, Kingsley Fanwo, described the allegation as characteristic of the author and his sponsors. “It is baseless and unfounded”, he said.

    His words: “If Governor Yahaya Bello is not popular, why are they jittery? The governor is not prepared for the 2019 politics yet. He has a mandate to discharge and he will work for the people until his last day in office.

    “It is unfortunate that the social media has provided a platform for such an unintelligent allegation. We do not have to react to such. Governor Yahaya Bello does not work in INEC and clear statements have been made that the governor was in Dubai on the said day.

    “INEC has not started registering people offshore and it is free to investigate any issue that affects it.

    “The governor is committed to fulfilling his obligations to the people. He is busy building roads, schools, hospitals and making agriculture the epicentre of our economic prosperity. These are the issues that can attract the attention of the governor.

    “The media should concentrate on development rather than promoting irrelevant issues. We want the media to partner us to take Kogi to new heights.”

  • Data raises MTN’s revenue by 11.6% despite loss of subscribers

    • Firm explains sack of 280 workers

    Despite a 2.3 percent decline in MTN Nigeria subscriber base, the Group reported 7.1 per cent rise in its first-quarter revenue driven by a strong performance in data services, it said yesterday.

    MTN Nigeria said it “had a strong start to the year with an 11.6 per cent increase in total revenue, supported by a 71.3 per cent boost in data revenue”.

    It added that while the momentum is encouraging, the ongoing review of value-added services subscribers will put pressure on digital revenue for the balance of the year.

    This was impacted by new regulations that require all subscriber connections to take place in permanent brick-and-mortar structures. It says this led to a marked reduction in gross connections across the industry.

    MTN said data revenue, which contributed 20 per cent of total revenue, was up 29.4 per cent for the three months ended March 31.

    Its Group Chief Executive Rob Shuter, in a statement, said: “In our key markets of South Africa, Nigeria and Iran, significant network investments made over the past few years are underpinning the improving revenue trends.

    “The network investment planned for 2017 is expected to support further market share gains across our markets.”

    Meanwhile, the telco yesterday justified its sack of 280 workers in its Nigeria arm, stressing that it was designed to balance individual employee needs with business exigencies.

    “MTN is a diverse community of committed change agents, brought together in pursuit of a common goal – driving growth and transformation by sharing our technology. Our people are our greatest asset, each individual’s knowledge, experience and ideas contributes to our continued growth and improvement. As such, ensuring a healthy and highly motivated workforce is a priority for us.

    It is with this in mind that MTN Nigeria has implemented a Voluntary Severance Scheme designed to balance individual employee needs with business exigencies. The programme was designed drawing on feedback from employees and following consultation with elected employee representatives. It provides a financial incentive and opportunity for employees who have worked with MTN for over five years to pursue other career interests and personal ambitions full-time, while increasing opportunities for professionals with a fresh perspective wishing to join the MTN family,” the telco explained.

    According to MTN, the successful conclusion of the scheme last week made it possible for it to tailor the competence and experience base of its workforce to meet technology shifts and future business needs.

    “MTN is unrelentingly committed to Nigeria, and continues to execute its strategy of attracting, developing and retaining the best Nigerian talent. This is in line with the ongoing business transformation to drive sustained growth and thereby facilitate MTN’s continued role as a partner for progress and socio-economic development in Nigeria.

    “The management of MTN appreciates the contributions of former colleagues and wishes them well in their future endeavours. Our focus at this time is securing the well-being of employees as we work together to forge the future, and deliver exceptional quality to our customers,” MTN said.

    Year-to-date capital expenditure stands at 4.6 billion rand, MTN said.

  • The ‘price floor’ for data services in telecoms

    After the brouhaha and the exchanges – including the legislative intervention and the attendant thawing of the ice cold grip of obfuscation of facts and populism – that greeted the introduction of a floor price for mobile data services in Nigeria, it is necessary to dilate on the real motive behind the direction and the debate the matter has generated. I refer to the sociological and economic contexts – the images and metaphors that have shaped both the decisions and the fallouts.

    In doing so, I apply three core principles of relationship management, albeit more applicable in international relations. These are: the Golden Rule, which enjoins that you treat others the way you also want to be treated. The second is the Platinum Rule which instructs that we should treated people the way in which they wish to be treated. Finally, the Double Platinum Rule which commands us not to capitalize on the ignorance of the people but to treat each other with fairness.

    Implicitly, the application of these principles in this instance speaks to our right to know. And we have an obligation to treat others likewise – OTHERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW. Besides, the spirit of the second principle implies people should be treated the way in which they want to be treated. One implication of this ‘injunction’ is that people need to be told the truth. The second rule is by extension and congruity to the third is a challenge to the public intellectual – when others capitalize on people’s ignorance, the rest of us have a duty to put their submissions in contexts that enable the public to see which interests are served by the submissions and arguments of those who seek to deceive the naive.

    Nigeria has over 153 million active lines, and the tele-density is 109.5 percent. Broadband penetration is already at 21 percent – an impressive mark indicating the sector will surpass the 2018 target of 30 percent. At present, there are over 93 million Internet users in Nigeria.

    It is also noteworthy that the ICT sector is the third biggest contributor to the GDP, following the oil (petroleum), and agriculture sectors; it is also terrific that 15 years of the liberalization of the telecom sector has recorded an impressive cumulative investment of $68 billion.

    Interestingly, the Nigerian story is in congruence with the global trend of how the ICT sector is displacing hitherto notable strongholds of national economies. At the moment, the four most capitalized companies in the world are in the ICT sector – Microsoft, Apple, Google and then Facebook, which recently pushed Mobil, a renowned oil giant to a fifth place.

    Therefore, the real motive for the direction from NCC with respect to the price floor is to safeguard a reversal of national fortune, protect the entrepreneur (irrespective of the size of investment), save the industry, and prepare the market for the real competition ahead.

    Without any iota of equivocation, the public needs to know that ‘price floor’ and ‘price cap’ are regulatory guidelines that are usually not imposed. They are products of discussions and engagement between regulators and operators to ensure the survival of the industries or markets. The former is a minimum price while the latter is a maximum price for a service or product agreed upon by government or organizations in tandem with stakeholders – OPEC does this regularly to protect the interest of its members and the industry.

    The telecom market watchers would therefore recall that a price floor of three naira 11 kobo (3.11K/mb) was in place since 2014 until October 2015 when it was suspended to enhance data penetration. Before the suspension of the new price floor on November 30, Etisalat offered data services at 94 kobo per megabyte, MTN did at 45 kobo, Airtel at 53 kobo and Glo at 21 Kobo. Other smaller operators like Smile and Spectranet also offered different prices but neither of the small operators offered data services at a price above 94 kobo.

    As in other jurisdictions, the Nigerian telecoms market is segmented. Operators that control less than 7.5 percent of the market or are recent entrants are encouraged through policies, regulations and guidelines to stay in business. It was therefore necessary to intervene when some of the operators started offering data at prices that do not even cover the cost of production – a scenario akin to dumping in elementary economics.

    This is precisely the rationale for nudging the players in the data segment to agree to a price floor because activities of some operators have become anti-competitive and predatory.

    Predatory pricing finds expression in offering services at a price clearly below production cost by some operators ostensibly to attract customers to their networks after which they will shrewdly increase the prices. By the time this happens, the predatory operators would have succeeded in driving the smaller operators out of the market. An indication of a grand plan to return the industry to the days of NITEL – to create a monopoly or a duopoly or even at the very best an oligopolistic scenario in which a few operators will hold the nation and its people by the jugular and offer data services at possibly 10 naira per megabyte – and the customer will either take it or leave it.

    A pointer to this possibility as the discerning and industry enthusiasts will have noticed is that there has not been any spectacular expansion of network infrastructure by any of the key operators since October 2015. In its stead, the industry has been signposted by an inordinate scramble and partition of customers that speaks to a clear and present danger orchestrated to hurt the health of the industry.

    Expectedly, in the vortex of these challenges, the NCC reflected on the scenario and decided to undertake a benchmark study, especially across Africa. As the commission embarked on the study, the operators were notified, and some of them confirmed NCC’s findings in the follow-up engagements that NCC had instituted to nudge operators to an evidence-based direction. Quite expectedly too, there were correspondences between the commission and the operators preparatory to the advent of the price floor. And it was evident to all stakeholders that the introduction of a price floor was imperative to sanitize the market.

    However, in view of the fact that there was no unanimity of position nor a scintilla of readiness by the operators to converge positions on an appropriate pricing, the NCC on October 19, met the operators to convey its position  after considering respective responses from the operators and the objective realities of the industry. Consequently, a floor price of 90 kobo per megabyte was introduced as it was considered a fair pricing. It was also agreed that the floor price will be effective from December 1.

    As we can see, procedurally there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the introduced price floor. The pricing methodology is an instrument to check abuses by operators, abuses which by this and many narratives in the public space had already set in. Importantly, the price floor is cost oriented in keeping with the ITU’s recommendation for cost-oriented telecommunications services provision.

    It is also pertinent to state that the big operators have had their days and are still enjoying economies of scale as well as operational stability. There is absolutely no reason for a gang up because the Nigerian Communications Commission as the regulator of telecommunications services also has a responsibility to ensure the survival of the new operators.

    Indeed, the survival of all operators is the utmost interest of the Commission in view of the implications for employment generation, service provision and the growth of the economy at large. This explains NCC’s interest and determination to ensure a level playing field for all operators to enable the country to move steadily at the right pace.

    • Comrade Panti is a social entrepreneur. He lives in Abuja.
  • Inexpensive data

    Telecom data should be easy on the pocket

    Less than a week after a rather surreptitious move toward telecommunication data price increase was obstructed by the Senate, the Minister of Communications, Adebayo Shittu, has maintained that the increase is inevitable.

    The Senate had ordered the suspension of the hike which was to take effect on December 1, and had initiated a public hearing on the matter. It was during the session before the Senate Committee on Communications last week that the minister insisted that even though the data price hike may have been suspended, data price would have to go up eventually.

    Here are his reasons: “I know that if you want to make omelet, you must break eggs. Unfortunately, in this country, we fail to appreciate the transformation role that ICT has brought about in the lives of Nigerians…It is also important to say that operators in Nigeria are operating in a very harsh situation, which is not known in other advanced countries. For instance, over the years, the Nigerian state has not succeeded in fixing electricity over the last 20 years…”

    Shittu continued: “The other challenge is in the area of security; … Indeed we know what the security situation is in the country. Apart from that, we also have the problem of taxes…What I am saying is this, if Nigeria has invited international investors to come and invest in Nigeria so that our lives will be better, … to whom much is given, much is expected.”

    However, it is intriguing that the Nigeria Communications Commission (NCC) and operators like MTN have different arguments to support data price hike. Prof. Umar Dambata, the executive vice chairman of NCC, told the Senate that the regulatory body intervened with an interim price floor for data services to avert a looming price war in the telecommunications sector. Such a price war, it feared, could eventually lead to a monopoly in the telecoms industry that would force small operators to shut down.

    But MTN, perhaps the biggest telecoms player in Nigeria today, has an entirely divergent view. The company’s CEO, Mr. Ferdinand Moolman, argued: “MTN is committed to continue its efforts to provide the best data network to the people of Nigeria. In this regard, however, there are a number of factors that impact the sector’s sustainability such as: the rise of headline inflation to about 17.9%; the depletion of operator revenues by unlicensed providers of “over-the-top” telecoms services who do not have any physical presence; nor pay taxes; nor make any significant contribution to employment or other socio-economic objectives of the government in Nigeria; and the inability of operators to access foreign exchange (this is particularly debilitating given that most of our inputs are sourced off-shore). This has very significantly increased both operating and capital expenses.”

    The foregoing narratives give insight into the challenges facing telecommunications as well as telecom operators.  First, it is apparent that the minister is in a strange environment and seems to need guidance.  The NCC, on its part, appears to have a different agenda, and is probably more intent on beefing up its bottom line; while MTN’s presentation was clarifying enough to give a picture of alleged irregularities that should be remedied. The operator has invested massively in data facilities and seems poised to dictate price to the chagrin of other stakeholders.

    Whether the situation calls for data price hike is another matter altogether. It is important to consider the situation contextually. It would appear that the problems in the telecoms sector are complicated by weak and ineffective regulatory and supervisory institutions; this can be observed from the operator’s argument.  It follows that the minister and the NCC need to be more conscious of their roles and more alive to their responsibilities.

    There is no doubt that telecom data is indispensable today and will likely be even more so in the future. The country has a duty to ensure that data is inexpensive and abundant in a data age.

  • Much ado about telecoms data price

    The raging debate over the proposed introduction of a price floor for data services by the nation’s telecoms regulator should be seen in the context of what it is: an indexation of the right of Nigerians to free speech. It illustrates most eloquently the fact that the fundamental human right to freely hold an opinion on any matter is respected in the country. And that is cheery news.

    But beyond the deafening din, there is the overriding need to distil the matter and make bare its fundaments. First, the nation’s telecoms regulator, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) proposed a price floor for data services. The interim price floor of 90 kobo per megabyte was arrived at after consultation with telecom operators on October 19, this year. A price floor is the base price that an operator can sell its data. An operator can sell above the price floor but never below it. In simple term, it is the minimum price that an operator can sell a unit of data measured in megabyte.

    Media reports quoting a letter from the regulator to the operators said NCC clearly stated that the interim price floor was for the big operators and that the rate will subsist pending the finalization of a study on the determination of cost-based pricing for retail broadband and data services.

    The price floor regime was essentially to provide a level playing field for all operators in the telecoms space and to encourage small operators and new entrants to acquire market share and operate profitably just so they do not face insolvency. Both categories, small operators and new entrants, were exempted from the price floor. The regulator went ahead to define small operator as any operator with less than 7.5 percent of the market share while a new entrant is any operator that has operated less than three years in the Nigerian market.

    In the main, the directive from the NCC is not punitive. Here then is the misconception. The Senate must have misread the lines when it asked the regulator to suspend the introduction of the price floor regime. The Senate acted in the public interest. The NCC also acted in the public interest. The only difference is that whereas the Senate acted for the immediate satisfaction for the telecoms consumer, the regulator from its commanding height as the driver of the industry acted for the good of the consumer in the long run. Besides, the action of the regulator is not just in the interest of the telecoms consumers but also in the interest of the nation.

    The President of the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON) Mr. Gbenga Adebayo has argued that the regulator was spot on with the introduction of the price floor for data as a way of arresting anti-competitive practices which has already set in and which is crippling the small operators. He has also confirmed through press statements and media interviews that the decision was taken after a consultative forum between the NCC and the operators. He stressed that operators need to be guided by a price floor to avert the danger of frustrating the flourishing healthy competition that has come to define the nation’s telecoms market.

    The position of ALTON was on Tuesday corroborated by the Executive Vice Chairman of the NCC, Professor Umar Danbatta, when he appeared before the Senate Committee on Communication. Professor Danbatta told the committee that the intervention of the NCC was not designed to undermine the consumers, neither was it also intended to undermine the operators but to find a common ground whereby all the stakeholders, the operators and consumers, would enjoy the gains of participatory regulation which the regulator is noted for.

    He said: “We wanted to protect the Nigerian consumer from unhealthy price war in what may lead to a monopoly that may lead us to the days of NITEL. We did not increase any price but merely provided a regulatory standard to protect small telecom operators.”

    Danbatta said that there were some telecom operators that lacked the capacity to compete with the big operators in the field and there was the urgent and compelling need to protect such operators to enable them to remain in business and gain reasonable foothold in the market. No regulator can be faulted on this.

    ”A situation where a dominant operator provides services far below what is obtainable in the sector in order to attract more customers may lead to a situation where smaller operators will be forced to shut down. We stepped in when we noticed price war in the sector. The price war was already reaching undesirable level that we had to step in to prevent a monopoly like the days of NITEL,” Danbatta told the Committee.

    In other words, the intendment of the price floor was to protect the telecoms consumer, promote healthy competition among operators by allowing the small players the opportunity to co-exist with the big players without suffering grave economic injury that would sound their death knell.

    To fully grasp the wisdom in the regulator’s intervention, Nigerians should ponder why the CDMA’s (Code division multiple access) operators could not effectively compete in the data business with the GSM operators. Some CDMA operators are merely gasping for existential breath. They need to be protected.

    The introduction of a price floor should not be interpreted to mean an increase in tariff. On the contrary, it will lead ultimately to low tariff because it will encourage robust competition, admit more investors into the market and give the consumer the option of choice. It is the most effective tool to avert a drift to a monopolistic market.

    Any Nigerian who is of age will remember the anguish visited on the public by the state-owned NITEL in those days. Then telecoms services were not available, accessible nor affordable.  This country cannot afford a return to those dark days.

    The Nigerian telecom regulator has had a rich history of consultative and participatory regulation which strikes a balance between protecting the consumer and encouraging the operators (investors). This robust regulatory style has in the past one year alone earned the NCC global recognition including from the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) as a model regulator for the emerging markets.

    Suspending the price floor regime is akin to postponing the dawning of the full majesty of the telecoms industry especially as Professor Danbatta is rallying his team to expand and deepen the broadband market.  The glory of the industry can only fully manifest in an atmosphere of multiple choices which is the fodder for healthy competition. The regulator, noted for its active engagement with consumers through its telecoms consumers’ forums and outreach programmes, may need to engage the consumers further on this to get their buy in. The National Assembly should also see the logic behind the price floor: It is not anti-people.

    On the contrary, it is one of the most consumer-centric decisions to be taken by the regulator.  The Nigerian telecoms market has been internationally acknowledged as both revolutionary and resilient. The immediate past Secretary-General of the ITU, the eminent Dr. Hamadoun Toure, never ceases to use the miracle of the Nigerian telecoms narrative to underscore what good regulation can do for any nation’s telecoms market. At the just-ended ITU Telecom World in Bangkok, Thailand, he said there must be something Nigerians are doing very well to have kept the country’s telecoms bourse within the league of the very best in the world. He narrowed the reason to regulatory efficiency.

    The regulator, the legislature and the operators have variously echoed that their actions were for the common good. The challenge is for these stakeholders to find a common ground to convince the other critical stakeholder, the consumers, that a price floor for data (not voice) is not meant to hurt them but to proactively stave off an impending implosion in the telecoms data market which dire consequences can only be better imagined than experienced.

     

    • Umukoro, a blogger, writes from Lagos
  • Data tariff hike suspension: Sweeping dust under carpet

    Data tariff hike suspension: Sweeping dust under carpet

    Those opposed to data tariff hike has won a temporary victory over members of the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON) – the planned data tariff increase.

    But in the days ahead, stakeholders in the industry would face the grim reality over the sustainability of the status quo. Maintaining prevailing price regime means a lot to the industry, except of course things have to remain as they are.

    Experts have argued that things cannot remain the same in an industry considered as “dynamic, capital intensive and competitive.” As everyone awaits “the finalisation of the study on the determination of cost-based pricing for retail broadband and data services in Nigeria,” it is important to put the issues in their proper perspective once more.

    The Nigerian Communication Commission (NCC), through a letter, had directed the big telecommunication companies to increase their data tariff beginning from December 1. The letter was signed by the Policy/Competition & Economic Analysis Director, Miss Josephine Amuwo and the Legal Regulatory Services Head, Mrs. Yetunde Akinloye.

    The duo signed on behalf of NCC’s Executive Vice Chairman Prof Umar Garba Danbatta, who had on assumption of office in August last year, unfolded an eight-point agenda to drive the vision of the NCC. Among others, his agenda was to facilitate broadband penetration, improve quality of service, protect and empower consumers and promote fair competition and inclusive growth.

    The proposed hike in data tariff was to check the emergence of dominant operators in the data service segment and ultimately enhance broadband penetration into the rural area.

    It’s a journey that must start now

    The document further explain that the measure would provide a level playing ground for all players and protect the industry from massive predatory pricing and safeguard investment, ensure growth, and development and sustainability of the industry.

    In the letter, the NCC put the interim price floor for data services at N0.90k/megabyte (MB) for the big operators. The big carriers before this new development have been charging as follows: MTN 45k/MB, Globacom 21k/MB, Etisalat94k/MB and Airtel 52k/MB, putting the average at 53k/MB.

    The smaller operators and new entrants price per megabyte shows that Smile was charging 84k/MB, Spectranet 58k/MB and Natcom was charging 72k/MB. The average charge of this category was 71k/MB. The small operator were described by NCC as “one that has less than 7.5 percent of market share and a new entrant is an operator that has operated less than three years in the market”.

    Reactions to the new price regime were spontaneous from across the country, forcing the NCC to suspend the hike. Its spokesman Tony Ojobo cited a general outcry from Nigerians as reason for the suspension. He said the NCC new position was taken after due consultation with industry stakeholders.

    Among critical stakeholders that kicked against the hike were members of the National Assembly, Trade Union Congress (TUC) and the National Association of Telecom Consumers (NATCOM). Nigerians also took to the social media platform to express their opposition to the hike.

    The Senate ordered a halt to the increase and set up a committee to further look into the matter. The upper chamber promised to involve all the agencies connected to the matter in its investigation.

    However, ALTON expressed disappointment over NCC’s decision to suspend the proposed price hike. ALTON Chairman Gbenga Adebayo said the regulator’s action would be unhelpful to the industry, as data prices had already fallen to unreasonably low and unprofitable levels.

    He said the public sentiments expressed across the country against the hike were understandable, but that NCC’s intervention as a regulatory body should not be driven by sentiments.

    Ekanga Attah, a Nigerian who resides in Ghana, in a publication by The Cable reacted thus: “inasmuch as I don’t support the increase in tariffs, but we have to understand that data (and goods in general) is still relatively cheaper than in most other countries.

    “I bought 6GB on Vodafone Ghana for 90 cedis (N9000) and petrol cost 3.69 cedis (N369) per litre while a bottle of star which is manufactured here in Ghana costs the equivalent of N500 while every other commodity cost twice or thrice as much as in Nigeria while the salary scale is equivalent to that of Nigeria as I learnt due to heavy government taxing which makes me want to run back home.

    “So, I know that the government is making some kind of miracle because bigger economies exposed to our type of shock like Venezuela and to some extent, Saudi Arabia, are actually experiencing total upheavals.

    “And to think they still have to do all this with Northeast in total ruins while catering for about two million Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs). So, I would say at this point in time we should shoulder the shocks and ride it out because it could have been so much worse.”

    Again, the planned increase in data tariff brought into the front burner the issues of infrastructure development and expansion in the industry and the imperative of quality of service. Would Nigerians prefer poor quality of service such as slow networks to improved quality and fast network service?

    Would a reasonably justified hike at a period of recession not be an incentive to industry operators who are also facing the challenge of sourcing foreign exchange in the face of depreciating naira value?

    Industrial operators also face the challenge of equipment shut down and vandalism, yet, the base stations are powered with diesel in the face of electricity supply gap.

    The NCC had rightly argued in a document obtained by The Nation that chief among the reasons for the reintroduction of the price floor was that  “some service providers were actually pricing their services below cost, a situation which could spell doom for the industry”.

    The ALTON president had warned about the unsustainability of keeping the prevailing price regime. His outcry might be seen as a cry to protect his members, but his warnings that “if the matter is not urgently addressed, it could lead to deterioration in the quality of data services across all networks and attendant poor quality of experience of users,” should not be ignored.

    An official of the NCC said “it is also in the interest of consumers who have stake their hard-earned income on data purchase to get quality service in return. Or of what benefit is a data purchased at cheaper rate, yet, to download a two-hour movie takes as long as a day, leaving consumers frustrated.”

    The official also noted that attaching a 10-page Curriculum Vitae in a Cyber Café could be as slow and time consuming, the pains and frustration of not getting it done at all after buying a 1.30-minute airtime could be  nightmarish.

    “The hike in data tariff, he further argued should be a win-win situation for all stakeholders in the industry. Whether it is now or later, the choice is before all the stakeholders”, the official who pleaded for anonymity explained.

    An industrial player also said that “ for those who do business with data, service quality is imperative and irreplaceable.  This could be a different ball game all together for other consumers, however, the NCC is better placed in the long run to chart a course that would be more beneficial to all.

    “Good that the NCC had developed a culture of consultation and openness to ensure justice, and fair-play by putting all the cards on the table, its regulatory functions to ensure the growth and development of the industry remains sacrosanct in the days ahead.”