Tag: debate

  • SUG aspirants unfold manifestoes at ASUU debate

    The local chapter of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) of the University of Lagos (UNILAG) has organised a debate for Students’ Union Government (SUG) aspirants. The event, which was put together by Students, Labour and Mobilisation (SLM) Committee of ASUU, gave the aspirants opportunities to intimate students of their programmes should they be elected.

    The debate was witnessed by the ASUU chairman, Dr Adelaja Odukoye, Dean of Students’ Affair, Prof Tunde Babawale, and a lecturer at the Department of Political Science, Dr Lara Quardri.

    The event started with one-minute silence in honour of the late Oluchi Anekwe, a 300-Level Accounting student, who was electrocuted recently on the campus.

    In his address, Dr Odukoya said students must exercise their rights in determining their leader and set agenda for the people that lead them. Prof Babawale, in his remark, hailed the organisers, saying the event gave students an opportunity to study their colleagues who wanted to lead them.

    The debaters were called out one after the other, starting with students vying for Sport Secretary. Each aspirant enthralled the audience with their manifestoes. The presidential hopefuls had hectic time with members of the audience, who hurled a barrage of questions bordering on welfare, cultism and ideology at the aspirants.

    The closing remark was given by ASUU chairman.

     

  • Clinical Sciences wins UNILAG debate

    The Faculty of Clinical Sciences of the University of Lagos (UNILAG) has emerged winner of the university’s 2015 debate tournament.

    The duo who represented the faculty, Jeremiah Adewale (Physiotherapy) and Minka Naton (Medicine and Surgery) were presented with laptops and cash prize of  N50,000 each.

    The annual Inter faculty debate which started last month had the theme “Leadership and National Development.”

    Clinical Sciences and three other faculties (Education, Environmental Sciences, and Engineering) qualified for the final held last Tuesday.

    Debating on the topic: “This House will dialogue with Boko Haram”, Adewale whose team opposed the motion argued that it was necessary for the law to take its course so that insurgents who have wreaked havoc, discouraged investment as well as tainted the image of the country should be fought “fire with fire”. This, he said, was the only logical way to revive peaceful co-existence in the country.

    On the opposing side, Ronald Adimoha who represented the Faculty of Education suggested a peaceful dialogue and granting amnesty to the insurgents, would not only arrest the conflict of interest but preserve lives.

    Speaking on his team’s victory, Adewale, noted that he was determined to win as he had identified weaknesses from his past debates. He expressed his gratitude and advised his colleagues to study harder.

    However, giving his view on Boko Haram, the 400-Level student called for dialogue in the place of military action.

    “I am an advocate of dialogue; it is the key to solving Boko Haram in the country.  Going to war will only bring great consequences, because in elementary science you can only fight fire with water,” he said.

    The Faculty of Environmental Sciences came second and its representatives got Infinix Hot Note phones and N30, 000 each, while the third place representatives of the Faculty of Engineering represented by two students, got Techno phones and N20,000 each.

    The Vice Chancellor, Prof. Rahamon Bello, said the debate was organised to help the students to think fast and enable them to tackle issues in any given condition.

    He advised them to always embrace debate and desist from thinking that they cannot do it. He added that the school looked forward to rewarding winners bountifully in the next debate, which is a way of motivating and placing much importance to debate.

    The Dean of Students’ Affairs, Prof Babatunde Babawale explained that insurgency was a cause for concern for the nation and opinions generated from such debates may be helpful in addressing the problem.

     

  • Mass Comm wins faculty debate

    A Student of the Department of Mass Communication of the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Charles Agu, has emerged winner of theInter-departmental debate of the Faculty of Social Science. He beat five opponents from other departments to win the contest.

    The debate, with the theme: State fragility: The bane of Nigeria security challenges, had participants testing their knowledge on a wide range of topics. The first set of speakers from the departments of Economics, Political Science and Psychology supported the motion, while speakers from Social Work, Mass Communication and Sociology opposed the motion.

    The presenters mounted the podium to buttress their points, after which they were given an impromptu topic to debate on.

    The debater from Political Science spoke on “EFCC is relevant to fighting corruption”, his counterpart from Sociology spoke on “Nigeria should withdraw from the United Nations: True or false” and debater from Social Work spoke on “LGBT right is a prevention of fundamental human rights in Nigeria”.

    The debater from Economics spoke on “The power tussle in national assembly an index of democratic consolidation”, while the speaker from Mass Communication spoke on “Devaluation of Naira: A right step towards economic development” and thedebater from Psychology spoke on “Autonomy of INEC is a myth”.

    Members of the Panel of Judges said they were impressed by the speakers’arguments, but advised the debaters on stage management.

    The assessment was done independently by each judge but the head of the panel, Dr Olubunmi Ajibade, gave the aggregate of each debater.

    At the end of the contest,the representative of Mass Communication Department won with 218 points, with departments of Economics, Social Work, Sociology, Psychology and Political Science trailing behind with 205, 204, 197, 179 and 161 points.year’s edition of Enactus National Entrepreneurship Challenge will start on Tuesday.

    The contest, which will hold at Civic Centre on Victoria Island, Lagos, will be attended by hundreds of students from higher institutions across the country.

    The event with the theme: Enabling progress, will afford participants to showcase their innovative ideas and solutions to many challenges in business, community-based and educational projects.

    The students are expected to tackle real problems that will have positive impact on people, business and society.

    In preparation for the contest, the participants visited cities and rural communities across the country to initiate projects that would impact and improve the quality of life and standard of living. The projects were nominated for the contest and students are expected to defend the feasibility of their work.

    Teams from over 40 tertiary institutions will present their individual projects before a panel of more than 60 business leaders, who will evaluate the projects’ feasibility and opportunities. The contestants will go through two preliminary stages and teams with best projects will proceed to the grand finale, where winner will emerge.

    The team that wins first position will get the chance to represent Nigeria at the Enactus World Cup holding in Johannesburg, South Africa between October 14 and 16.

    The event will feature a special competition for prizes in the second edition of Sahara Light Up Nigeria Challenge. The contest, sponsored by Sahara Group, is structured to stretch the creativity and ingenuity of the Enactus teams in developing energy projects that can generate electricity and conserve power for the future use.

    There will also be a Future Women in Leadership Forum, where women leaders in each Enactus team will be engaged in mentorship to develop their leadership skills and achieve their full potentials. The objective of forum is to provide answers to key questions on leadership, using practical life examples.

    Enactus is an international non-profit organisation that brings together students, academics and business leaders who are committed to using the power of entrepreneurial action to improve the quality of life and standard of living of the people.

     

     

  • Students win Corps members’ debate

    Students win Corps members’ debate

    Corps members serving at the College of Agriculture and Animal Science in Kaduna State have held competitions for the institution’s students. The contest featured quiz, debate and scrabble.

    The auditorium was filled when the debate came up between departments of Animal Health and Animal Production, with the topic: Animal health more than animal production deserves more societal attention.

    Representatives of the Animal Health Department argued in favour of good health, saying sound health was God’s best gift to mammals. Without a sound health, there can never be production, they argued.

    The Department of Animal Production debaters posited that there was no need for health service if animals were bred under normal circumstance. “Production boosts economy of the country and with proper prevention, the health practitioners would be rendered useless. Do animals in the bush need health service to survive?” Promise Zamani, one of the debaters, argued.

    There was excitement among members of the audience as the debaters exchanged ideas. The debate was followed by quiz between the Higher National Diploma (HND) 1 and II classes.

    The scrabble contest was held at an open space outside the hall, with enthusiastic students watched the players – Samuel Jonathan, representing the college and Joseph Elaigwu, NYSC team – slugging it out.

    At the end of the contest, the judges announced the final result. Animal Production Department won the debate contest with 18 points as against 14 points scored by their Animal Health counterparts.

    HND 1 class defeated HND II in the quiz, while the school team beat the NYSC team 356-103 in the scrabble contest.

    Lauding the initiative, the Deputy Provost, Mr Muhammed Abdullahi, enjoined students not to forget what they learnt in the competitions. He said the school would ensure such contest is held periodically.

    One of the Corps members, Aisha Ibrahim, described contest as educative, saying: “The idea behind the contests was to encourage public speaking, promote the spirit of sportsmanship and interaction among students and their lecturers. We purposely made this our Community Development Service project.”

    Other members of the CDS group include Habiba Muhammad, Sola Mamadelo, Musa Suleiman, Aisha Muhammad and Aliyu Ibrahim.

     

  • English students hold debate, public speaking contest

    National Association of Students’ of English and Literary Studies (NASELS), University of Lagos (UNILAG) chapter, has organised an intra-departmental debate and public speaking contest for its members.

    The event was held at the Arts Theatre. It was attended by students and lecturers in the Department of English.

    NASELS President Ibrahim Yusuff said the aim of the contests was to serve as a platform for students to improve their debate skills and public speaking.

    “The aim of this event is to serve as a platform in discovering good debaters and public speakers among students, who will represent the department in the coming Faculty of Arts Inter-departmental Debate,” he said.

    Emmanuel Afolabi, a 200-Level student, won the debate; Fredrick Okonji, a 100-Level student, came second.

    Olakunbi Fagbongbe, a 300-Level student, is the public speaker; Adeola Adetoye, a 400-Level student, came second.

    Emmanuel said the content of his arguments gave him an edge over his opponents, urging his colleagues to imbibe the spirit of determination.

    His words: “I am happy because the efforts I put into the debate are not in vain. I believe it is the extra efforts I put to my arguments that gave me an edge over my co-debaters and this made me to stand out. The logical presentation of my arguments also contributed to my win.”

    Lecturers at the event include Dr Austin Nwangbara, Dr Yewande Ntekim-Rex, Mr Nurayn Alimi and Mr Charles Akwen, among others.

     

  • Candidates shun debate

    CANDIDATES for the state legislative elections in Abia State have abstained from a scheduled debate organised by a television station.

    The debate, organised by Modern Communication Limited (MCL) TV, according to the organizsers, was to provide a platform where candidates of various political parties would sell their manifestos to the electorate.

    It was also meant to help the electorate make informed decisions on whom to vote for during tomorrow’s governorship and House of Assembly elections.

    Candidates of political parties present at the debate were those of the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA), Emmanuel Unegbu Emmanuel who wants to represent Ikwuano, Labour Party (LP) Lucky Akabuike, for Umuahia North and PPA candidate for Umuahia South, Nwigwe Lucky.

    A media consultant to the MCL TV, Dr. Charles Chinekezi, who was visibly angry by what he described as undemocratic and uncivilised attitude of the candidates, bemoaned the attitude of the candidates who, by their actions, have exhibited acts of disrespect to Abia people who they were aspiring to represent and also expecting to get their votes tomorrow.

    According to him, the organisers, after inviting all the political parties and their candidates, also did a follow-up to ensure that they were duly notified, wondering why they boycotted the exercise after the publicity and to appear on the day at no cost to the candidates.

    Chinekezi, who stood in for the chairman of the political debate committee, Chief Ogwo Agu, said it was regrettable that the candidates boycotted an opportunity that would have enabled them to sell their programmes and mandates to the Abia electorate.

    “We extended invitation and reminders to all the state Assembly candidates of the various political parties in Aba zone. A good number of them promised to participate. We don’t know why they boycotted the exercise. The debate is one of our station’s contributions to the development of democracy in the country. It is at no cost to the candidates.

    “We aimed at helping the electorate assess the quality of candidates who seek to represent them at the House of Assembly. At least, this would have helped the electorate to make the right choices. The days of voting in people because of sentiments are over. We don’t want to leave the electorate blind,” Chinekezi said.  He expressed fears that a decline in the quality of Assembly candidates would continue to be counter-productive, allow the legislature be manipulated by the executive and affect the kind of legislation they make for the state as long as the electorate were not allowed to elect the right people into the legislature.

    One of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Assembly candidates, who spoke in confidence, said he could not afford to attend the debate because it came at a time when he and probably other candidates were busy campaigning across his constituencies.

  • Imo governorship  debate ends in crisis

    Imo governorship debate ends in crisis

    This year’s edition was disappointing. Crisis started as Imo State governorship debate traditionally organised by the Catholic Diocese was about to begin.

    Every election year, churches and religious groups organise debates for the candidates, though the Catholic Diocese of Owerri has been adjudged the most famous and a must-attend for all the candidates.  It is presumed that any candidate who wins the Catholic debate will be elected.

    The Catholic debate, which started in 1999, became famous during the 2011 governorship election after Governor Rochas Okorocha defeated the then incumbent Governor, Chief Ikedi Ohakim and subsequently won the election with the support of the Catholic faithful who were directed to vote him en masse.

    But this year’s edition went awry when hoodlums descended on the audience and vandalized sacred Church properties before the candidates arrived at the venue.

    As early as 8am, the Odenigbo Pavilion, venue of the event was filled to capacity with party supporters who could not hide their desperation. The stern look on the faces of some of the supporters, especially the youths, was instructive.

    Trouble started while the Chairman of the Organizing Committee, Rev. Father Casmir Nze, was reminding the audience of the conduct during the debate.

    While he was still speaking, a group of women numbering over 200, who were dressed on black clothes, started blowing whistles and displaying red cards, while chanting anti Okorocha slogans. This was followed by a resounding response from another group of women, who were dressed on the regalia of the Catholic Women Organization (CWO), who were chanting pro-Okorocha slogan.

    The Catholic women who were listing Okorocha’s achievements took over the premises, singing and dancing.

    At this point, some armed hoodlums invaded the podium and destroyed the chairs and other Church properties including the public address system and video cameras, while the clergymen who were already on the podium, jumped down and fled.

    There was stampede as the people scampered to safety. It took the efforts of security operatives to stop further destruction of Church property.

    Meanwhile, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) have continued to trade blame over the incident.

    Addressing reporters, the Director General of the Rochas Okorocha Campaign Organisation, Mr Iheukwumere Alaribe, a lawyer, accused the state Chairman of the PDP, Nnamdi Anyaehie for the inciting the hoodlums to chant anti-Okorocha slogans while blowing whistles and displaying red cards.

    He said: “We commend the Church for the initiative and are ready to honour the invitation whenever it is rescheduled but we are worried that if the PDP and APGA do not refrain from politicizing the Church, it may have negative effect on the faith of the worshipers. For instance, the PDP Chairman came to the venue with over 50 armed thugs and the same thing with the PDP governorship candidate Rt. Hon Emeka Ihedioha who was escorted by hoodlums with whistles and red cards. But we are not worried because we are ready for the election”.

    However Ihedioha, who arrived the venue in the thick of the crisis, stated that, “the APC hired thugs and invaded the place because Governor Okorocha knew what awaited him if the debate had held. He knows that the majority of Imo people have rejected him. With his attitude it is obvious that he doesn’t want the election to hold.

    The shocked Archbishop of the Diocese, His Grace Anthony Obinna, thanked God that no life was lost in the fracas, adding that the event could have gone as planned if not for the crisis.

    Meanwhile, reacting to the development, the State Governor, Rochas Okorocha commended the political parties and candidates who would have participated in the debate, for their peaceful conduct,  which he said averted what could been a bloody clash.

    The governor in a statement signed by his Senior Special Assistant on Media, Mr. Sam Onwuemeodo, said, “It is a good development for Imo people that supporters of the political parties met for such a function and there was no major fracas and nobody was wounded.  It means Imo people have come to appreciate the fact that beyond politics we are still brothers and sisters, whether we are in APC or PDP or APGA or UPP”.

    The Imo state governor also commended the Archbishop of the Diocese, His Grace Anthony Obinna and the Catholic Archdiocese of Owerri for coming up with such a laudable idea of bringing the governorship candidates together to tell Imo people what they have in store for them if elected.

    He assured, saying, “Whenever the debate is re-scheduled whatever caused the postponement of the event would be taken care of.”

    According to him, there was the story of the supporters of the candidates and political parties holding mini rallies at the venue of the debate and creating a rowdy situation that scared people away.  The truth of the matter is that, in an event of that nature involving governorship candidates and the Owerri Catholic Archdiocese such excitement and rowdy scenarios could not be ruled out but the good thing was that there was no fracas.

    “However, we took exception to the statement credited to the Governorship candidate of PDP, Hon. Emeka Ihedioha who rushed to one of the radio stations in the state the moment the debate was cancelled to claim that the APC supporters beat up a Reverend father at that event.

    “Although eighty per cent of the crowd at the venue of the debate were APC supporters owing largely to the popularity of Governor Okorocha, the truth remains that APC supporters never confronted anybody, talk more, beating a Reverend father, of all people.

    “Hon. Ihedioha is not the spokesman of the Owerri Catholic Archdiocese.  The Archdiocese has a media Director and a number of good Information Officers.  And if Hon. Ihedioha’s claims were right, the Archdiocese would have spoken and they would have also given detailed information on that like when a PDP governor then flogged a Reverend father.

    “Imo people know the particular political party that has the unbeatable record of beating men of God including a reverend father.  It is not in the character of APC leaders and members to do such. Once again, we thank Imo people, members of all the political parties, and moreover the Owerri Catholic Arch-Diocese for their love for the state, God bless Imo state and her people.

    Two days after the fracas, facts were said to have emerged about how widows and hired thugs, allegedly mobilized by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), disrupted the governorship debate organised by the Catholic Archdiocese of Owerri.

    The purported widows numbering over 500, The Nation gathered were the same set of women that invaded the Imo State Government House bearing mock coffin at the alleged instance of the Minister of State for Education, Professor Viola Onwuliri.

    The women who were dressed on black attire also had red card and whistles which they had earlier concealed in their bags until they were given the signal to blow the whistles and flash the red cards.

    It was also gathered that the widows, were instructed to disrupt Governor Rochas Okorocha’s speech during the debate and applaud the PDP candidate, Rt. Hon Emeka Ihedioha during his speech.

    Speaking with The Nation, Bar Iheukwumere Alaribe, stated that the PDP never wanted the debate to hold because of the Governor’s intimidating record of achievement, adding that, “the All Progressives Congress (APC) government has done well in the last three and a half years in the state and this has endeared Governor Okorocha to the people so such debate will expose the PDP and give the people of the state the opportunity to compare between the APC led government and the PDP that frittered the wealth of the state for 12 years.

    He continued that, “we were very happy about the planned debate but you saw what happened and how the PDP were fighting to politicize the Church. The people know the truth and will stand by the truth no matter the antics deployed by the PDP”.

    Also speaking, the State Commissioner for information and strategy, Chief Chidi Ibe, lampooned the PDP leaders for “hiring thugs to disrupt an event that was organized by the Church, just to stop the Governor from giving his scorecard”.

    He lamented that the disruption of the well attended event, had robbed Imo people the opportunity to have an interface with the candidates, especially to “hear their performing Governor give his account of stewardship”.

    A member of the Catholic Church who did not want his name mentioned, described the attitude of the women as sacrilegious, adding that, “it is becoming worrisome that women who have lost their husbands have become tools in the hands of mischievous politicians in the state. How can it be said that widows will abandon their children to go and disrupt public peace because of the peanuts given to them by politicians”.

    The source added further “it is this same set of widows that the Governor’s wife has built over 200 houses for I wonder why they are allowing themselves to be deceived by the PDP members. They seem to forget how they were treated during the PDP administration in the state”.

    An Owerri-based legal practitioner,  Iwuala Emperor, who disagreed with the modalities for the debate, said that it contravenes the Electoral Act, which stipulates that no political gathering or debate shall be held in religious places of worship, adding that it is a criminal offense that attracts one month imprisonment or one hundred thousand naira fine

     

  • Why I shunned debate with Jonathan, by Buhari

    Why I shunned debate with Jonathan, by Buhari

    PRESS freedom is guranteed, should Gen. Muhammadu Buhari win the March 28 presidential election.

    But there will be no debate with President Goodluck Jonathan, the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate said yesterday.

    Gen. Buhari said also that change revolution without firing a shot was imminent in the country.

    Buhari, who spoke at an interactive session with members of the Newspaper  Proprietors Association of Nigeria( NPAN) and the Nigerian Guild of Editors( NGE) in Abuja, restated his stand against a debate with President Goodluck Jonathan.

    He said there was nothing to debate after 16 years of misrule, especially what he described as the six years of bad governance under Jonathan.

    He said: “To be fair to me and Mr. President, after 16 years of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and six years of his time, is there anything to debate?

    “Very seriously, you know the condition we are in; we are all experiencing it, no matter who you are. So, what should I debate there?”

    On the general election, Buhari said the shift on February 14 was unnecessary.

    He said INEC made it clear that it was prepared for the elections.

    He gave insights into what INEC Chairman Prof. Attahiru Jega told the Council of State meeting and how the military differed.

    He said Nigerians were waiting to see whether  or not the military would have rid Adamawa, Borno and Yobe of Boko Haram insurgency.

    He said: “I will give you the latest. When INEC submitted a comprehensive document on February 14th election to the Council of State, a number of us made comments. INEC did a good job and they put it on record because after submitting a document, you cannot withdraw it.

    “They submitted a document on what they had been doing since 2011, including training of personnel, acquiring election materials and how they were distributing them; and how they secured them.

    “They even said they were ready to conduct the election because they had achieved about 60 per cent distribution of the voter cards. In the previous elections, it had never been better than 45 per cent. But they were prepared.

    “Somehow, the military told them they cannot guarantee their security. Then six weeks were given and for Nigerians, those six weeks were within the perimeter allowed for the election. So, INEC said they should be allowed to give the military six weeks.”

    Gen. Buhari said Nigerians had been watching the military on how it would secure the remaining local government areas before the polls.

    He added: “The reasons given have exposed the inefficiency of the leadership because there were only 14 local government areas in the hands of Boko Haram. These were 10 in Borno, two in Yobe and two in Adamawa.

    “If Nigerian military cannot secure 14 local government areas in six years, how can they do it in six weeks. We are watching. We have only about 10 days to go in the six weeks. Let us see. In spite of the help of our generous neighbors, let us see whether the remaining LGAs can be secured. (Continued on Page 2)

  • Students play Jonathan, Buhari at debate

    Students play Jonathan, Buhari at debate

    Students of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) in Ile-Ife, Osun State have held a mock presidential debate ahead of the March 28 election. The debaters, who stood on the platform of either the All Progressives Congress (APC) or the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), marshalled points on why their parties should win the election. The parking lot of the students’ Union Building was aglow for the event. AFEES LASISI (300-Level Political Science) reports.

    Call it a mock presidential debate and you won’t be wrong. But the discussants had a common purpose – the progress of the country. They made their presentation without rancour. They explained how their adopted parties – All Progressives Congress (APC) and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) – would achieve their goals – if elected.

    These were no candidates contesting elections; they are students of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) in Ile-Ife, Osun State. Last Friday, they participated in a debate organised by the leadership of the Students’ Union Government (SUG).

    The car park of the Students’ Union Building (SUB) was filled by students who came to listen to the programmes of both parties. The debate, which was part of the union’s leadership conference, was put together by Akorede Awode, its Assistant General Secretary.

    Akorede said the debate was to enlighten students on the party with the best programmes and candidate in the March 28 presidential election.

    President Goodluck Jonathan is PDP’s candidate; Gen. Muhammadu Buhari is for APC. Both parties were represented by students at the debate.

    PDP’s representatives were Goodluck Osaretin and Samuel Fakiyesi. Ismaheel Bayewunmi represented APC. The session was moderated by Olatayo Shittu, the General Secretary and Seun Fakorede, a student.

    APC, PDP clash at students' debate...students at the conferenceSamuel, one of the PDP discussants, argued that President Jonathan should be given another chance to bring his Transformation Agenda to fruition, noting that the president’s programmes had brought meaningful development in the last six years. He said another four years of Jonathan would be to the country’s good.

    He said: “President Jonathan has allowed other arms of government to function freely without meddling in their affairs. The entrepreneurship programmes introduced by the president have created millions of jobs for  youths. We have also enjoyed freedom of speech unlike what we used to have under the military.

    “The signing of Freedom of Information (FoI) Bill into law has brought about free press and people can criticise the government without fear of arrest. The president has boosted education with the establishment of more federal universities across regions. The increase in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has made our economy to grow faster, thereby making the nation largest economy in Africa.”

    But APC’s Ismaheel said there was a difference between economic growth and economic development.

    Economic growth, he said, is the number of sustained businesses and investment in the country. He defined economic development as the impact of the growth on the masses. He punctured PDP’s debaters’ claim of economic development, saying the condition of living of the masses has worsened.

    Ismaheel challenged his opponents to explain why the value of naira is falling against the dollar if truly the economy is growing. He asked them to provide statistics of jobs created yearly by the Jonathan administration in the last five years.

    Insurgency in the Northeast, Ismaheel argued, attests to the failure of the PDP-led Federal Government. Courageous leadership, he added, is needed to combat the Boko Haram menace, saying Gen. Buhari remained the best man for the top job.

    He said: “Under the PDP administration, the rate of corruption has increased and the nation has gone down further in corruption rating. To redeem the image of Nigeria in the comity of nations, we need an incorruptible and a tested leader, who will lead by example. It must be someone whose antecedent speaks volume in effective leadership and ability to fight corruption.

    “All these attributes are found in Gen Buhari. I am convinced that he has what it takes to lead this nation and pave the way for real growth and development in all sectors. If our economy is stabilised, the widening gap between the dollar and naira would close and the economy would grow. APC would proffer solutions to the insecurity challenge claiming innocent lives  daily. Also, education is one of the priorities in the APC manifesto; we should expect re-structuring of the education system for better and quality education.”

    In his counter-argument, the second PDP discussant, Goodluck, said corruption had been in the system before the incumbent came to power. He said the president had fought corruption than any of his predecessors, stressing that Jonathan would do more to stop graft if re-elected.

    Goodluck said: “We must never allow a dictator to steer the affairs of this nation in a democratic period. He would infringe on the fundamental rights of the people and prosecute people he perceives as personal enemies. President Jonathan is an unrepentant democrat and he is the best man to lead the country.”

    In his closing remarks, Ismaheel said: “We have several challenges facing the nation and these are caused by years of PDP misrule. We must vote in Gen. Buhari to move this country forward.”

    There were questions and contributions from members of the audience. Many were convinced beyond doubts who to vote in the presidential election.

    A guest, Pastor Peter Alabi of Rhema Word Church, said the presidential election would re-define the country’s destiny, adding: “This is an election that has generated more than a passing interest on the people in the history of this country. No one knows who would win or lose.”

    He advised the students not be induced by material property before voting for a party, urging them to vote according to their conscience.

    Olawale Kessington, a graduate of the university, said a leader who could not tackle the nation’s challenges has no right to be in office.

    Akorede said the debate was to make students decide which party to vote for in the general elections. He promised to organise a post-election debate that would feature Edo State Chief of Staff Hon. Patrick Obahiagbon.

  • Debate for ‘learned’ minds

    Debate for ‘learned’ minds

    The 20th National Law Students Debate was held last Thursday at Africa Amphitheatre of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) in Ile-Ife, Osun State. CALEB ADEBAYO (500-Level Law) reports.

    It was a sight to behold. The contestants wore sparkling white shirt, black trousers and jackets  to match. They faced the audience to present their arguments. It was reminiscent of a court session. But this was not a courtroom; it was the 20th edition of the National Law Students’ Debate held at Africa Amphitheatre of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) in Ile-Ife, Osun State.

    The event, organised by Prima Strata Club, started with the introduction of the panel of judges, led by the Dr Chijioke Uwasomba. Other members are Dr Babafemi Odunsi, Mr Sola Adegbite of OAU and Dr Tete Adams, a Law lecturer at Babcock University.

    The participating schools included the host institution, Lagos State University (LASU), Ekiti State University (EKSU) and Babcock University.

    Three speakers from each university spoke for 20 minutes for or against the theme of the debate: Insecurity in Nigeria: An exposure of youth neglect.

    During the first round, Olayemi Omolaja, who led the LASU team, argued for the topic. She said insecurity was a result of neglect of the youth by successive administrations. She supported her claims with what she called failed youth policies.

    Kayode Adekunle, who led EKSU team, spoke against the topic. Using Machine Theory of social engineering to open his argument, Kayode stunned the audience with his compelling accent.

    He cited the successes of the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Ibramovich, who he said had deprived beginning yet affected the world positively with their youthful energies. Kayode said the action of Farouk Abdulmutallab, who was convicted of terrorism in the United States, could not be used to interpret the cause of youth violence, noting that Abdulmutallab was born in affluence but chose to be wayward.

    The second speakers of both EKSU and LASU teams also supported their stance on the discourse. The Babcock team spoke against the topic, but the OAU team spoke in favour of it.

    Odjeni Emuesiri, who led OAU team, explained how insecurity stemmed from neglect of youths by the leaders. But Babcock team opposed her claims.

    At the end of the first round, the EKSU, OAU and Babcock teams had the highest scores. They qualified for the final, where the two teams spoke in favour and against the topic: Two party system: A panacea for Nigerian electoral flaw. Each team had five minutes to prepare.

    Babcock team mistakenly fielded a debater, who was not part of the team in the first round. Members of the audience called for disqualification of the team for the laxity but the judges nullified the points scored by the team. The debate started all over again with the original team members.

    As the judges prepared the final score after the debate, Olusola Amusan, Citizen Manager of Microsoft in Nigeria, spoke on job opportunities and how students could make themselves productive.

    Senator Babajide Omoworare, who  represents Ife East Senatorial District, told the students that though, a two-party system was good, Nigeria needed a multi-party system to sustain democracy.

    When the results were announced, the OAU team had 73.7 per cent, winning the contest. The Babcock team,  secon; EKSU, third.

    Odjeni got the prize for Best Orator. She also received N100,000 cash prize on behalf of OAU team for winning the debate. Other winners also got cash prizes.

    The OAU team coach, Adebiyi Ajayi, said the debaters were participating in the contest for the first time, stressing that the feat was achieved by the team’s quality presentation.