Tag: democracy

  • War Lord Democracy

    War Lord Democracy

    As military rule mercifully recedes into remote and distant memory in Nigeria, it is profoundly ironic that the democratic process continues to manifest some of the ungainly features of repressive autocracies. For example, there is the continuing militarization of the polity and the weaponization of politics itself to the point that it has become a game of political warlords. This much was evident in the last days of the last regime.  Only a balance of terror and the watchful eyes of the international community prevented Nigeria from tipping over into the abyss.

    But so soon thereafter, we are at it again as it is customary for a country with a legendary reputation for permanently camping at the edge of the abyss and for flirting with suicide.  Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you, and you sold me, as George Orwell famously noted. Politics in Nigeria is a game of multiple treachery and multivalent betrayal.  Yet it is only those who consider politics however dangerous hair-raising as a mere game that would fail to see the delinquent seizure of the machinery of the senate by some rogue senators in all its dangerous and destabilizing import.

    Once again, something new comes out of Nigeria. This one goes beyond the established norm of political normlessness. As we shall see, it strikes a deadly blow at the change mantra of the current regime. It casts the senate in dissident dissonance and disharmony with the executive and possibly with the judicial arm. It sets the stage for a crippling administrative disorder and possible disintegration. A hybrid senate leadership is a hybridized monster which is unknown in the history of modern democracy and one with a capacity to destroy even its own. It is a peculiar mess, a typically Nigerian peculiar mess at that.

    Having said that, it is important for those who have invested intellectual, strategic, political, economic and even ethnic capital in the project of change and the possibility of national redemption not to despair or throw up their arms in frustration. Democratic change cannot and does not occur overnight. It is always easier for forces of reaction to regroup and reassemble at short notice because they know the economic price of everybody but the political value of nothing.

    It is too early in the day to consign the Buhari administration to the trashcan of history. Nigerians, both mighty and low, must learn the virtue of patience. A people without any demonstrative capacity for collective revolutionary initiative must also not add the vice of impatience to their baggage. This is not the time to further inflame passions. It is not the time for wild speculations and unrestrained tirades. Without sacrificing party supremacy, APC must engage its dissident members. Bukola Saraki is a wasp perched on the most delicate part of the human anatomy.

    It has been a typically Nigerian coup, full of intrigues, double dealing, double crossing and ambush within ambush reminiscent of the exploits of Nigeria’s aging coup maestros. There is also a hint of self-coup, or what the Latin Americans call Autogolpe. An Autogolpe is a conscious coup against one’s self. But this one is probably unconscious.  When Mohammadu Buhari tersely but awkwardly noted that “a constitutional process has somewhat occurred”, we say with the retired general that it is actually a constitutional autogolpe that has somewhat occurred.

    The Nigerian president must now be helped out of the awful mess he has partly created. But he will need to change tack. He must avoid the Ben Bella Syndrome. Ahmed Ben Bella was a great hero of the Algerian war of independence against the French. It was a nasty and cruel contention whose echoes reverberate till date. When Ben Bella finally assumed office, he had become so physically, psychologically and emotionally drained that he could only spend time trifling with extant structures until his colleagues put him out of his miseries.

    There are extenuating circumstances for the presidential faux pas. As a born again democrat who has deliberately and strenuously purged himself of the autocratic mind-set of his military career, Buhari is anxious to be seen as a man who values consensus, a man is willing to marry messianism with the multiplicity of contrary views, and a man not willing to be seen as disrupting the seamless web of governmental harmony among the executive, the judiciary and the legislature.

    This can only work in advanced climes where people have learnt from bitter experience to live for the greater good of the greater society. But in a society teeming with political sharks and vultures, it is a manual for political martyrdom. It is up to the retired general to find a golden mean between the obsessive and obtrusive meddlesomeness of his military predecessor in civilian office and the hardy and alert proactiveness necessary to do the job at hard. The Nigerian presidency is not a habitat for secular saints.

    In Latin America after they had almost killed themselves off due to incessant and tempestuous coups, the generals decided on a simple method of eliminating the perennial bloodfest.  Whenever a coup is in the offing, they would do a simple troops’ audit and since God marches on the side of the greater battalion, the general with the highest number of battalions  on his side carried the day.

    On Tuesday, Bukola Saraki did a troops’ audit. But as a veteran power pragmatist who knows that there is no party as such but alliances of inconvenience, he simply called for help from battle hardened adversarial combatants itching for a pound of flesh. The old warriors of reaction and ethnic revanchists still nursing the wounds of their ouster from the federal Toll Gate simply rallied.

    It is a foul and unethical thing to do reeking of betrayal and perfidy, but it reveals the monumental hollowness that lies at the heart of the current democratic process in Nigeria. There is no party as such only amalgams of mutually contradictory and violently incompatible tendencies that have refused or are probably incapable of congealing and coalescing into an organic whole. It is a dialectical mirror image of Nigeria itself.  You cannot plant cassava and expect to harvest yam. It is a symptom in search of a disease and the nearest diagnosis we can come up with is democratic warlordism.

    In the event, the defeated and disorganized PDP showed greater cohesion and dynamic mobility than the ruling party. They have claimed that they were also benefitting from the phenomenon of Tambuwalism, which is akin to an invasion of enemy territory even before the commencement of proper hostilities. It is rumoured that the veteran Tambuwal himself also played a stirring role in this one. It is in the nature of cut-throat politics, and there are no permanent allies but present interests.

    The APC has received its baptism of fire. It should now go back to the drawing board. It should immediately put in place a rigorous mechanism for party conflict resolution through the three Cs: conciliation, compromise and consensus.  It is obvious that the party has suffered grievously due to lack of internal cohesion and as a result of excessive vanity and obsession with the spoils of office.

    When all else fails, it is only the presidency that can wield the big stick. The failure of the president to wade in much earlier and to do so in a decisive manner when he was eventually roused to act has resulted in a political black eye for the party. It is a curious irony that Buhari would seem to be encouraging political warlordism in his own party when the electoral revolt that swept him to power is a stinging disavowal of the same phenomenon in the larger Nigerian polity. The Nigerian senate is the surviving stronghold of our last political Shoguns.

    Having acquired teeth and muscle, this senatorial Shogunate is going to try President Buhari’s will and iron resolve to reform and sanitize the Nigerian polity to the snapping point in the next few months. It is going to be a battle royale the likes of which has never been witnessed in these climes. If the president wilts and withers away, it is all but guaranteed that his presidency will end as a colossal failure, unable to make a dent in the monumental rot that has stifled the nation. As we have previously advised, it is going to be a game of will and wits and the president will need all his political savvy and street wisdom.

    A lot is going to depend on his party and its principal partners. A few columns back, we had commended the tragic fate of the inchoate and incongruous alliance which ended authoritarian misrule in Kenya to the APC. Going forward to a fresh election, the party disintegrated into its political components and ethnic particularities. The result was a brief civil war which shook Kenya to its foundation and from which the country is yet to properly recover.

    It is not a question of whether one likes President Buhari or not. The Change Project which the retired general has courageously spearheaded in collusion with many patriotic Nigerians and which has resonated spectacularly with our compatriots both at home and abroad is the last chance to redeem this country and put it on the path of rectitude and righteousness.  If it fails, it is going to be goodbye to Nigeria as we know it.

  • Let democracy be for the people

    SIR: While other nations are faced with the challenges of the 21st Century,/ we are bogged down by the avarice of the elite./Every time we believe we have seen the worst from our country,/the shameless, opportunistic power grabbers take us back to a new low. – Nigeria Democratic Liberty Forum (NDLF), New York.(June,2010)

    With trillions of naira revenue, mostly from crude oil sales from 1999 till date, it is a crying shame that Nigeria parades some of the most disturbing dismal figures in the Human Development Index (HDI).From increasing poverty rate including helpless citizens caught in the terrible trap of extreme poverty, maternal and infant mortality rates, food insecurity to huge youth unemployment, our nation’s parlous economic situation is a criminal betrayal of what God has richly endowed us with.

    For instance, poverty rate rose from 15 % as at independence in 1960, to 67.1% in 1999 and 72.2% in 2014. The World Bank President, Jim Yong Kim, stated in April 2014 at the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings that Nigeria, with 7 % of the world’s poor ranked third in the world while India was placed at number one with 33 per cent of the world poor.

    Similarly, Nigeria’s unemployment rate rose from 5.8% in 2008, 19.9% in 2009 through 21.10% in 2010 to 23.9% in 2011. Infant mortality ratetotal stood at 74.09 deaths/1,000 live births. And Nigeria accounts for 13 per cent of Global Maternal Deaths, GMD.

    Simply put, the vast resources in oil and gas, agriculture, solid minerals and breath -taking tourist attractions have come to make the politically favoured few richer while the majority wallow in grinding poverty.This insidious systemic rot has got to stop. The paradigm must shift. The political pendulum must also swing in favour of the vast majority of Nigerians.

    Wealth re-distribution is a now a must. Nigeria can no longer afford a sordid economic situation that had 17,474 political office holders setting the nation’s treasury back by a whopping N1.13 trillion(naira) on yearly basis,and jerking up their emoluments at will as revealed by the Economist of London  in 2010.

    We can no longer sustain the huge capital flight of unpatriotic politicians who steal the nation blind only to empower foreign nationals. For instance, in July 2004 UNIDO Report listed countries such as China, India, Singapore and Thailand amongst those with robust economies that reduced poverty rate from an average of 40% in 1981 to 21 % in 2001 while ours was on the upswing. In fact, the Report singled out Nigeria as the country with the worst case scenario of capital flight and advised us to borrow a new leaf from Uganda, which had a similar challenge but was able to reverse the drift.

    Good enough, we now have the change mantra sweeping across the entire country, from Otuoke tropical forest, across Abuja savannah to Daura desert fringe. Coupled with this, the pilots of the ship of state have come on board with the proud pedigree as highly disciplined, patriotic and committed Nigerians, eager to enthrone transparency in governance.

    To do so however, all hands must be on deck. The undue fixation that the federal government alone should do it all- provide the requisite solid infrastructure (stable electric power, good access roads and rail, and potable water) as well as create jobs must be done away with. Hopefully, with the expected Constitution Amendment and implementation of the well thought out recommendations of the National Conference, true fiscal federalismshould eventually ensure that more economic resources are devolved to the states in this regard.

    The hope therefore, is that the Buhari-led administration should provide the much-needed conducive environment for businesses to thrive. There must be transparency and accountability in government such that our enormous resources are channeled to make the quality of life of the average Nigerian better and safer.

     

    • Ayo Baje,

  • ‘Buhari will deliver democracy dividends to Nigerians’

    Anambra State Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) leader Chief Godwin Ezeemo has said President Muhammadu Buhari’s modest lifestyle will enable him to deliver democracy dividends to Nigerians.

    He said Buhari should be mindful of those he appoints into his cabinet  to ensure that his administration remains focused on the change mantra that brought him to office.

    The PPA chieftain spoke in Abuja at the weekend after Buhari’s inauguration.

    “I believe that President Buhari will deliver democracy dividends; that is why I have come from Anambra State to be part of his inauguration.

    “I am interested in seeing what will happen. I was in his office in Kaduna in 2013 and I saw his character and humble office. That made me to really appreciate his type of person.

    “He didn’t display wealth rather, he displayed confidence that he had the ability to bring everybody together. I strongly believe he can.”

    Ezeemo said the battle against corruption would not be easy because the President cannot be everywhere.

    He said picking the right persons to work with would enable the President to reduce corruption.

    His words: “I know that this is going to be a very difficult area for the administration. The President cannot be everywhere, though we see him to be an upright person.

    “What I will suggest is that he must pick people that can deliver. He should not pick people because they come from a particular area not minding their ability to deliver on their mandate.

    “If he does not heed to this and picks incompetent persons, they will let him down and he will be blamed for it.

    “President Buhari should exercise caution in picking who to work with. If he gets the right people to work with him, we will then be able to fight corruption collectively.

    “There should also be CCTV cameras in all offices so that those responsible can monitor the activities that go on in the offices to checkmate corruption.”

    Ezeemo urged Buhari to form a government of national unity, saying he should ensure that democracy dividends are shared equitably to all parts of the country.

    Buhari, he said should concentrate efforts on the provision of electricity, insisting that most of the country’s problems arise from poor power supply.

    “For me, we have problems and these problems have their base on power. Most of the problems we have derive from poor power supply.

    “The availability of power in the country is nothing to write home about. If we have constant power supply, industries will spring up in all nooks and crannies of this nation and generate employment for the people.

    “If there is constant supply of power, agriculture can take off because we are still struggling in agriculture,” Ezeemo said.

  • Survival of democracy in Nigeria: A critical review of the 2015 general elections

    Survival of democracy in Nigeria: A critical review of the 2015 general elections

    Introduction

     

    •From left: Law Editor Vanguard Newspapers, Dayo Benson, Chairman NBA Ikorodu branch, Dotun Adetunji and former Chairman NBA Ikorodu branch, Nurudeen Ogbara at the lecture.
    •From left: Law Editor Vanguard Newspapers, Dayo Benson, Chairman NBA Ikorodu branch, Dotun Adetunji and former Chairman NBA Ikorodu branch, Nurudeen Ogbara at the lecture.

    It is indeed a matter of immense pride and honour for me to be invited to be the guest lecturer at the 10th edition of the annual Chief B O Benson SAN lecture. If I am permitted to disclose, Chief Benson SAN is not only a shining star of the legal profession, he is an elder in and out of the legal profession that commands the awe and respect of all and sundry. A great Nigerian of high integrity, his quintessential values is best understood by way of example from an interview he granted to The Vanguard Newspaper sometime in July 2012 on the occassion of his 80th birthday when he said and I quote; ‘’Contentment prevents me from chasing dollars at 80’’. This was upon being asked why he retired from active legal service 10 years earlier. The values exemplified by the honouree throughout his career and till date of honesty, truthfulness, decency and industry are values that have as a matter of fact and common knowledge receded into history in present day Nigeria or are at best only possessed by a few Nigerians today.  I recall that the honouree was President of the Nigerian Bar Association when I was in the law school in 1979/1980 and it was his comportment and leadership attributes that drew me into Bar activities. Indeed I coveted the office of the President of the NBA since then.

    Those values exhibited by our honouree are values associated with a Nigeria of a not too distant past. Today, the love and lust for money and a get rich at all cost syndrome has penetrated our society and threatens to tip us i.e. what is known as Nigeria over the praecipe.  How we got to this point of moral decadence and moral bankruptcy which has seen us degenerate from a country full of hope and promise to this abysmal level of socio-political and economic poverty despite our immense wealth and resources is not a matter for this discourse. However our negative and indeed degenerative status described above is a product of our political history. The journey we undertook in the past 100 years saw us metamorphose from colonialism (1914-1960) to independence when we embraced Parliamentary Democracy of the West Minster Export Model and practised politics of bitterness, deceit, avarice and disunity for six years i.e. 1960-1966. The novelty of the excesses of the political class during this period referred to caused the awakening or emergence of an unknown political monster i.e. the Nigerian military (Armed Forces) and they seized power in the year 1966, suspended the constitution and ruled by military fiat and decree from 1966-1979. During this period, the military defragmented the entity known as Nigeria from four  regions to 12 states then 19 states by the time they handed over power to a civilian administration in 1979.

    They also prosecuted an expensive and divisive civil war (1967-1970) at the end of which ‘a no victor no vanquished status’ was declared. The civilian democracy was terminated in 1983 by the military relying as justification on the corrupt excesses of the then NPN Government. At that time our political evolution and maturity had not reached the point where the electorate could override the corruption machinery of the political party in power as they did in the 2015 elections when all the stakeholders i.e. political overlords, the electorate, business moguls, civil society groups etc (excluding however traditional rulers, religious leaders, militant groups etc) were in agreement that it was time for the governing political party, the PDP to be sent out of the political arena. Thus in 1983, the military led by, guess who? GMB seized power and attempted to cure the ills of then Nigeria which was largely one of moral decadence through a cocktail of ethical re-orientation and anti-corruption measures albeit orchestrated and directed through the barrel of the gun.

    Their efforts, sadly in my view, were cut short by another military coup d’état in August 1985 championed this time by the triumvirate of Generals’ Mohammed Babangida, Sani Abacha and Abdulsalami Abubakar who ruled in succession from that date to 1999 when power was then handed over to a retired military Head of State, General Olusegun Obasanjo who rode into power on the wings of the Peoples Democratic Party. Now, this political party the PDP held sway from 1999 to 2015 when their rule was unceremoniously cut short by the combined efforts of Nigerians as described above.

    The performance of the PDP in the economic growth of Nigeria, indeed in all spheres of development i.e. infrastructure, power, transportation, political culture, probity and accountability, the legislature and to a large extent, the justice delivery system, which encompasses the judiciary, the provision of security, the creation of a level playing field for Nigerians etc was abysmally low and in these and other unspecified but strategic areas the PDP failed to deliver.

     

    The absence of  political philosophy or party  ideology in Nigerian politics

    Indeed, it came to light in the past 16 years that all the political parties that bestrode the political landscape like the proverbial Colossus had no political or social philosophy. No one could say what their fundamental beliefs were although it seemed  their members were agreed on one point, which is that political power was an avenue to the acquisition of personal wealth and stature in the society. In established democracies the position of government on all issues is based on the historical philosophy of the political party in power or in opposition. It is not based on the principle of who stands to benefit the most financially before a policy is passed or agreed upon. The absence of principles and philosophy upon which governmental policy or actions are anchored remains the bane or albatross of our present political system. Our leaders do not possess that moral high ground from which to launch their intent and policies. Before proceeding further, who are those that must take substantial blame for this lacuna? For me, I have always been worried that the South-West of Nigeria, with its immense human resources, early exposure to western education, unparalleled economic advantage and initiative abandoned its leadership position after the departure of the generation of the great sage Chief Obafemi Awolowo SAN and his contemporaries from the political stage. It seems from all available evidence that the political first 11 in Western Nigeria has abandoned in the majority, the political stage to their mosquito team. It is clear that majority of Yoruba intelligentsia now populate areas such as banking, finance, insurance, cyber-science, law and justice, entertainment, oil and gas etc as opposed to politics. The effect of the abandonment of the political arena as described is now visible for all to see. I will return to this phenomenon when the role of violence as employed by the political gladiators is considered in this presentation.

    Returning back to the thrust of this discourse, firstly, having acknowledged the fact that Nigeria has returned to civilian democracy and apparently now resolved not to allow the military to truncate our political march, it is necessary to consider whether our the foundation laid for the transition of power from one administration to the other can stand the test of time and sustain our political march as conceptualised by the 1999 Constitution.

    Secondly, it is necessary to consider how the electoral umpire INEC has fared in its effort to conduct fee and fair elections in Nigeria and particular how it conducted the 2015 general elections and the flaws, if any, associated with the latter.

    In concluding this part i.e. introduction it is necessary to draw attention to the fact that the topic in issue i.e. the survival of democracy in Nigeria cannot be viewed solely from the prism of the conduct of the 2015 elections by INEC. The principal bane to the survival of the democratic process or put in another way the survival of modern Nigeria is the effect of the activities of the political class on the institutions and infrastructure that sustain our national life. Consequently, it is intended in this discourse to suggest to the new Administration-elect the steps and agenda it should take having regard not only to the electorally induced problems, which in itself is substantial but also as it relates to institutional problems of leadership and governance that have afflicted Nigeria from time immemorial.

     

    Violence and the 2015 general  elections

    The violence that characterised the 2015 had been predictable. Leading to E-Day, there had been violent expressions of political rivalry among stakeholders and agents of political parties leading to the use of thugs, arson, terrorism and other extreme criminal measures. It is so sad that in the year 2015, our politicians are still resorting to the same vicious tactics employed by our founding fathers in politics. The result is that the polity even post – election is still super-charged. Economic activity has been severely affected due to politics. The magnitude of insecurity arsing from political activities reached the point that government introduced elements from the armed forces such as the Army and Air Force in order to keep the peace during elections. The result showed a slight reduction in the criminal activities during elections when compared to the data from the 2007 and 2011 elections. According to the National Human Right Commission, no fewer than 58 people have been killed in election-related violence from December 3, 2014 to February 2015. In Lagos, 11 incidences were tracked with two dead people for each incident, an average of 22 people killed over a span of just 52 days. In Kaduna State, there was within that period, three incidents and nine killings; Rivers has six incidents, including the detonation of explosives and attacks on courts.1

     

    Election day and post- election violence

    In Akwa-Ibom State, three persons were killed during the governorship  and House of Assembly elections. In Rivers State, four persons including a soldier were feared dead during the Presidential and National Assembly elections in the state. During the governorship and House of Assembly, five persons were feared killed in Benue State; four in Kebbi; two, each, in Rivers and Lagos; and one, each, in Plateau, Bauchi and Ebonyi.3 According to a post-election assessment by the Centre for Democracy and Development, it was authoritatively revealed that over 100 people were killed during the just concluded general elections. Please note that the electoral violence witnessed was predominant in the South – South, South – West and the South East Zones of the country. These statistics do not include those deaths that were unreported or those that were premeditated politically motivated assassinations, arson and other mayhem unleashed on the populace by politicians and their thugs. These deaths do not also include the Boko Haram attacks in Bauchi, Gombe and Yobe States during the elections which claimed several lives.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Responsible press and democracy

    SIR: One of the enduring tenets of democracy is freedom of expression as rooted in a responsible and vibrant press. A responsible media must as a duty hold government and the entire society accountable for their actions. Liu Xiaobo held that, “free expression is the base of human rights, the root of human nature and the mother of truth. To kill free speech is to insult human rights, to stifle human nature and to suppress truth.”

    It is expected that the media should be able to speak the truth at all times and send meaningful information and clarification on programmes of government as they affect the society. They are channels for interaction, communication, for dialogue and debate on the major issue of rural and urban development; presenting realistic reportage of events and forces working for and against societal goals for the betterment of the society at large is the goal of the media.

    To a large extent, the media sets the agenda and shapes the opinion of the society on numerous issues and events on local, states and national levels. That was why Jesse Scott declared that: “People are sheep. TV is the shepherd.” Nigeria got her independence without firing a shot largely due to an intrepid, vibrant, dogged and conscientious media. Since then, the Nigerian media has carved a niche for itself in carrying out its noble professional roles for the betterment of the society. The success story recorded in the just concluded general elections cannot be complete without mentioning the vital role of the media in setting the agenda for decisions and choice of candidates through various programmes and programmings.

    Conversely, could be jeopadised by media propaganda against a government, an individual or group and the conscious negative reportage of activities of these. Bad journalism according to an observer “is a consequence of an unregulated market in which, would be monopolists are free to treat the channels of democratic debate as their private property.”

    This brings us to the hoopla raised by the alleged barring the African Independent Television (AIT) from covering the president-elect until “issues of ethics and standards are sorted out.” Although the gaffe has calmed down, W.H Auden captured the mood of the media in all situations even in a democracy as he asserts that; “what the mass media offers is not popular art, but entertainment which is intended to be consumed like food, forgotten, and replaced by a new dish.” Nigerians should equally be aware that the media is like a two edged sword which can make or mar the society – it could serve the cause of the oppressed; it could equally become a solid instrument to oppress as well. Therefore it should be carefully handled.

    As May, 29 inches closer, the in-coming government should bear in mind that governments do not only succeed by having good intentions or well thought out people-oriented policies and programmes, but by the eyes and medium through which citizens, appraise  those intentions, programmes and policies.

     

    • Sunday Onyemaechi Eze,

    Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company, Kaduna

     

  • Democracy, May 29 and new global challenges

    As  Nigeria transits to a new government on her Democracy  Day  on May  29, and   the outgoing president fired the Inspector   General of Police  ostensibly  over partisanship  in the last  presidential elections, there  is no doubt that the  firing stemmed  from a clear case of sour grapes. The  Yorubas  have a saying that sums up  such furious  and  pointed counter reaction. They say desperate  diseases  require desperate cures  and that   literally  it is in order  to ruin the eggs of a fowl that overturns your pot of medication. Coming  from  a usually  restrained incumbent  president who some thought  could not hurt a fly and  whose  major weakness in losing the election was that he did  not perform or did not have plan to say what he did till  it was  too late, one  hopes this is not a potent  sign  of unexpected  actions that may make the transition turbulent after a graceful act  of defeat concession. Anyway  we  are watching and we are all ears as we  take on some issues  that walk  alongside  our   historic  match  towards  the inauguration of the president elect on May  29.

    Two  issues,  namely  migration to Europe  of  Africans   via  the  Mediterranean Sea and Xenophobia  in S Africa  dominate  the global  scene  and concern  this week. It  is   however  note worthy that the   European  Union-the EU  is deeply  concerned  about the flood  of Africans  who are ready  to  die on the high seas  in seeking a new life in Europe  by landing in Italy at any cost  just  to escape the life of misery and poverty  that is their lot if they stayed in Africa. On the  topic  of  Xenophobia which  is hatred  of strangers  and which  has been the lot of Jews  in  Europe leading  to Hitler’s  Holocaust  in the Second  World  War  one  thought  that  the  civilized   world  had learned enough from  such  horrors for humanity to move on decently in the assurance that man  has  transcended  such  levels of bestiality.  But  as  ISIS  has  shown   in  the  Middle East when it burnt  the Jordanian pilot alive  and displayed  the video  to  a world  audience   and Boko  Haram  did by abducting the over  200 Chibok  girls  in  Nigeria, while El  Shabab  went and killed mostly  female  undergraduates  in a Kenya  University  recently, barbarism and  lack  of respect for human life   and dignity is  still  a reigning  virtue  and value  in some  societies  in spite  of the attempt  or veneer  at civilization  and claims  of being decent and modern  societies.  I  look  at these two  issues  today and also  that of the visit  of the presidents  of  Ghana and Cote  D’Ivoire to  both the outgoing  Nigerian  president and the president elect and   draw  some conclusions  from some of the body  language reported  at  both  meetings.

    On  the migration  matter  which  has  become an election  issue  in Europe in which right wing parties  are becoming popular because  of  xenophobists  who  think foreigners are responsible  for their poor economic condition I  can  only hope  that the incessant  migration will  not lead  to a new xenophobic Europe against migration  altogether. Before  now  I had  argued   that Europe must take care  of the migrants  because of Colonisation,  its iniquities  and exploitation  of the colonies.  But that argument  does  not  hold water now given the way  elected  African  leaders  after  independence  frittered away golden  opportunities  to make economic progress  the goal  of their leadership. Instead  they    amassed  colossal  and  dubious  wealth  for themselves  and their families through  massive corruption  and personal  enrichment  that created the type  of poverty that made  their subjects  ready  to flee  and die  on the high  seas; to  seek  a better  life  rather  than hang  around and die predictably  of hunger and poverty  in their native nations.

    It  is  great  pity  indeed  that ironically  colonialism  created globalization  which  spawned democracy  and the market  economy which gave  rise  to corruption and political  instability and  that beckoned  on migration which  has now  created xenophobia in  Europe. It  could be uncharitable  but  one can  be forgiven  to say the  chicken has come home to  roost  but one  will still have to answer  the important question – for who? Is  it Europe  or  for  Africa?  For  me, at  the risk  of  being  said  to be dodging the question,  my sympathy  is with the EU for  the humanitarian  approach   some political parties  in power have adopted  to find a solution to the migrants issue  even though it is costing them expensive political power at recent and on coming elections especially  Britain  where campaigns  are on for elections into the next British Parliament.

    Certainly  one can  not compare  the type  of xenophobia  in Europe with  that of  S Africa fuelled  by a Zulu  King   who  said  a terrible thing and thought  he recanted when  he lamented  that he would  not be the first  to say  that foreigners  should  go home. The  Zulus  were  a war  like race and fought both  the British  and the Boers  who  seized their  land and colonized  them  but  the history  of the gallantry  of Chaka  the  Zulu  who  was their  most famous King is now part  of the history  of S Africa  that any  African  can  be proud  of.  Incidentally  S Africa’s  democratically elected president Jacob  Zuma  is a  Zulu  and should  do  something  urgently to  call  his king to order  so  that S  Africa does  not migrate  ingloriously  from  freedom  from  apartheid into  another   evil  opprobrium  of xenophobia  in broad  daylight  and right before  our eyes.  Really  it is very  saddening that  Nigerians from Nigeria which  led the fight to crush  apartheid globally  and free  Nelson  Mandela are  being targeted in the hate  fed xenophobia. President Jacob  Zuma should  use  his executive powers to stop the killing of fellow Africans immediately  and assure  his countrymen  of his strategies  to alleviate their economic woes and plight  in a nation where they  wield invincible  political  power  but  have  not been able  to translate  that into economic emancipation  and development  of the masses  of deprived  and suffering  black  S Africans.  The  solution  however  is not in killing well  meaning and hard working Africans in their midst.

    Just  as it is not in migrating as those getting drowned  in the Mediterranean are  discovering. Again  one can thank  God  Almighty that Europe is Christian  and  merciful  to the migrants  and has not turned them back or turned on them like the S Africans. I  think  that is what is driving the rescue  effort in the Mediterranean.  I  really  cannot resist quoting from  Mario  Puzo’s  best seller  The  Family  on the Renaissance  period,      given  me by my friend Eric  Teniola.   The  Renaissance   was a time    when  Popes  had children  and concubines.  Pope  Alexander told  his wayward  cardinal  son   Caesar  Borgia. ‘I  believe  in an  Almighty  God  that  is  Merciful  and Kind. That  is our   faith and that you must believe. Learn  to  live with your sins. Confess  them  or not  but never  doubt  faith. ‘ That  I believe,  by some bizarre twist   of   fate,  is what is  driving Europe  which  is largely    faithless    today  to pick  up  Africans ready to die to escape  man made poverty and penury  and find a way to give  them succor  in a foreign land one way  or the order. I doff  my  hat – and   bless  my heart-  to them  in awe  and admiration  as they  exhibit  the best  trait of humanity  amidst  the cascades  of globalization and modernization;  which  is being one’s brother’s   keeper.

    Lastly  the visit  of the two  incumbent presidents   from Ghana  and Ivory  Coast  to  our incumbent  president and president elect   could  not   be devoid  of  certain  feelings  and emotions. Of  course the president elect  was  happy  to receive his august  visitors  as he expects  from May  29  to  begin  to enjoy the dignities, honors and   perquisites to which  the visiting heads of states  are accustomed to. On  the other hand the   visit  to the incumbent    or  outgoing   president  have been  devoid  of the usual  pleasantries  and banters as the host  has lost  power although  he has not lost face  or dignity by  the swift  way  he conceded defeat.  The  visit  was  a farewell  one.  That  explained  why  according to some reports there was one podium for the visitor instead  of the usual  two for the incumbent and visitor as in the recent happier  days. That  again shows that  power  is transient and  is  not a permanent   possession of  any  politician  as  it is renewable at  the polls only  at  election  time;  as we  did last  time  and effected  a change and  a sweet  one  at  that. Again  long  live the Federal  Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • Centrality of Opposition to stability, sustainability of democracy

    Centrality of Opposition to stability, sustainability of democracy

    The climax of democratic consolidation on the African Continent has, generally speaking, taken place in the de-jure transitions from single party rule, where incumbent regimes monopolised nearly every facet of political and economic life, to a system of plural politics where alternative parties were legally permitted to organise and challenge the existing political order. For many of the incumbent parties on the continent as well as international donors, multiparty elections were and still are considered to be the clearest expression of a ‘new’ liberal political order and the pinnacle of democratic decision-making. However, the majority of those that follows and conducts research on the African political scene point out that the emergence of opposition political parties and multiparty elections is an insufficient measure of democracy, whereby most African states appear to be in the midst of a stalled transition (Whitehead, 2000).

    This textbook offers a new perspective on political opposition in contemporary African democracies. After a critical review of the classic and contemporary literature on the subject, it proposes a renewed definition of opposition that better grasps the complexity of political opposition in democracies. In addition, the textbook proposes setting a new agenda for future research on political opposition. The book is structured around a number of topics which are considered to be pertinent to the analysis of opposition parties and the current intellectual debate on opposition political parties in Africa in general and Nigeria in particular.

    Following no particular order of choice, chapter one of this book by Salihu Niworu set the tone by assessing opposition party in the face of primitive accumulation in Nigeria. The chapter discusses succinctly how the ruling party utilizes the poverty and quest for material accumulation of the opposition parties to entrench their dominance in the political system. The author notes that after a decade of democratization in Nigeria, the dominant political party, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has not shown any concrete index of meeting the aspirations of the Nigerian people.

    He therefore calls for vibrant opposition to checkmate the excessiveness of the ruling party. Chapter two by Elegunlusi focuses on the philosophy of opposition political party and development in Nigeria. The author adopts historical methods in discussing opposition parties and their involvement in national politics. He notes that even though opposition parties are important in tackling the crisis of development in democratic African societies, their existence is mostly threatened by African ruling governments. He also argues that in situations where governmental policies are left unchallenged, the socio-economic and political situations of the country will not advance.

    From a philosophical perspective, Bartholomew Onyekwere examines opposition party and the quest for good governance in Nigeria. In it, the author shows that in countries that have entrenched democratic culture, there are civilized ways of employing the principle of checks and balances in the democratic dispensation and that one common way of doing it is through the practice of party opposition. He critically examines the various contributions of opposition activities since Nigeria’s independence and that opposition practice in Nigeria has made valuable contributions to the effect that the ruling party has had to be careful when formulating policies.

    Aderonke Majekodunmi’s contribution centers on opposition parties and good governance in Africa. The author shows that the issue of good governance is at the heartof developmental and political discourse in Africa and that the indispensable role of opposition parties in protecting the interests and rights of citizens, monitoring government and ultimately in good governance cannot be over-emphasized.

    The author locates the function of opposition in good governance. She notes that opposition have had very limited opportunity to contribute positively to the process of democratic governance in the continent. In chapter five, Michael Oni and Emmanuel Oluwole, succinctly focuses on opposition parties as opposition to good governance in Nigeria. The authors note that in developed polity, opposition parties ensure that the government in power is on its toes and that opposition parties in these polities are regarded as alternative government or government in the waiting. This is because they are virile, organized and coherent to pose threats and challenge misrule of the government in power. However, this is not the case in Nigeria where opposition parties are in disarray, unorganized and not potent enough to serve as government in the waiting. As a way out, they advocate that opposition parties need to close ranks to serve as alternative government in order to ensure that the government in power sits tight to offer good governance to the people.

    Adeola Gabriel discusses how robust opposition political party is a necessary institution for democratic stability in Nigeria. For him, the essence of opposition party is a necessary regulation to curtail the tyranny of majority ruling party. The author argues pertinently for the institution of a strong, powerful and robust opposition political party as a necessary checks and balances to the ruling party, the stability of the political system, the sustainability and progress of Nigerian society. He believes that the absence of a robust opposition political party will hinder pluralism which is necessary in enhancing proliferation of opinions and beliefs that characterize a stable social order. Blessing Thom-Otuya and Goddey Wilson focus on opposition political party and democratization in Nigeria.

    The authors are of the opinion that the activities of opposition parties have significant impact on democratic activities in Nigeria. As a result, attempts were made in the chapter to examine the challenges and various ways of strengthening opposition party in Nigeria. Opposition political parties and democratic consolidation in Nigeria’s fourth republic is the focus of chapter eight. The author argues that good governance cannot be achieved in Nigeria without the opposition challenging unpopular policies and constant demand for accountability from the ruling party. The chapter concludes by underscoring the need for the various opposition parties to work together rather than against one another. This is imperative in order to build strong opposition to the ruling party as well as offer better options towards democratic consolidation in the country.

  • Democracy will thrive

    SIR: I wish to commend the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for successfully holding the last general election, especially the presidential one. Despite the technical hitches created by the card readers and violence, the electioneering was greeted by many, including the foreign observers.

    Before the election, some experts had said that Nigeria might collapse; that a victory for President Goodluck Jonathan could worsen the insurgency in the North. On the other hand, some said with victory for Major-General Muhammadu Buhari, the restiveness in the Niger Delta could resurface.

    However, all these permutations failed as President Jonathan on hearing the election results, surprisingly, positioned himself as a true democrat when he accepted defeat with equanimity.  The signs of the ‘ides of March’ was for the number citizen was when the card readers failed about two times to read his fingers on election day. When he finally performed his civic responsibility, and journalists asked for his opinion on the election, Jonathan’s response was calm, cool and calculating. No wonder it was welcomed by many Nigerians, who heaved a sigh of relief.

    The second good thing Jonathan did on the general election was the congratulatory message via a phone call he made to Buhari. With this noble step, many Nigerians believe that, indeed, a Madiba exists in the creeks. Let me quickly add that on assumption of duties,  Jonathan’s mien and nuances gave him a carriage that his last decision, especially the one he made on the day the elections were announced put him in the minds of the people globally that, indeed, he’s a great democrat. His quote on that day: ‘My ambition was not worth the blood of any Nigerian’ has brought him to light just as it brought to him more encomiums.

    I see a new dawn for Nigeria. The international community will now see us as people who can manage our situation.

    In my opinion, an icon Nigeria never knew know live with us. He’s Jonathan. He’s to be celebrated by Nigerians and his actions have shown that democracy will thrive in Nigeria.

     

    • Valentine Opone,

    Magodo, Lagos

     

  • Nigeria on path to true democracy, says NBA chair

    Nigeria on path to true democracy, says NBA chair

    The Nigerian Bar Association(NBA), Ijebu Ode Branch has said the manner in which people conducted themselves during the governorship and House of Assembly elections was a testimony to the fact that Nigeria is on the path to true democracy.

    The branch’s chairman Otunba Oloruntobi Mamora stated this at the end of last Saturday’s polls.

    Mamora, who led a committee to monitor the election in Ijebu Ode, described the exercise as “free, fair and  credible”.

    He said the people were enthusiatix about what they wanted for the town.

    “The people showed that they are clear about how the next person gets into office and not much as to who is the person,” he said.

    The NBA chairman said he observed that the people of the ancient town were “patient” and determined to choose new representatives.

    “They defied the heavy rain and sun. In some areas, people provided tent, chairs and accommodated all parties,” he said.

    He said there was no violence that usually characterised past elections.

    Oloruntobi described the turn out as low in some areas and impressive in some wards.

    He observed that the turnout was, however, below what was recorded during presidential and National Assembly election.

  • Jega, Jonathan, Buhari heroes of democracy, says Bakare

    Jega, Jonathan, Buhari heroes of democracy, says Bakare

    Serving Overseer of the Latter Rain Assembly, Ogba, Pastor Tunde Bakare, has named Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, President Goodluck Jonathan, and President-elect Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, as heroes of the presidential elections.

    In what he termed as the ‘congratulatory part’ of his sermon titled: “Chances, Choices, and Consequences”, at yesterday’s Easter service, Bakare said Jega was deserving of the honour because of the role he played in delivering credible elections and not yielding to provocation.

    For graciously conceding defeat, the lawyer-turned-pastor said President Jonathan has defended Nigeria’s democracy.

    “You acted when it mattered most.  You are one of the heroes of democracy, and we thank you,” he said.

    For his patience and tenacity in seeking the presidential ticket since 2003, Bakare said Buhari, whom he called Mr. Integrity, was worthy of mention.