Tag: deportation

  • My deportation experiences in US, UK, Netherlands, others – Returnee

    My deportation experiences in US, UK, Netherlands, others – Returnee

    • Says I was handcuffed, chained on 12-hour flight

    While many Nigerians are bitten by the japa bug and they desperately seek refuge in foreign lands in search of a better life, many who jetted out without proper documentation are living to regret their actions. Among them is 55-year-old returnee, Oluwashina Ahmed, who spoke to GBENGA ADERANTI about his nasty encounters with immigration officials in the US, UK, Ireland, and the Netherlands.

    His broad smiles and calm mien betrayed the rough encounters he has had with immigration officials in no fewer than four European countries from where he was deported back to his fatherland. But behind the façade of smiles is the trauma fifty-five-year-old Ahmed has had to endure in his 22-year search for greener pastures.

     Although he now functions as a petty trader selling native herbs and sachet liquor, Ahmed has not given up on his bid to return to America and continued life from where he stopped in God’s Own Country.  “I want a judicial review of my deportation,” he said in a firm voice that conveyed more of entitlement than privilege. “I want my deportation case to be reviewed by the government of the United States because I didn’t get a fair hearing before I was deported.”

    Ahmed’s lifestyle and living standard are a contradiction of his travelling experience. Spotting a loosely buttoned shirt made with Ankara fabric when the reporter met him on a Thursday afternoon, he seemed to bother less about what challenge life has left. Popularly called “Doctor’ in his Lagos neighbourhood, he acknowledged greetings left, right, and centre from those who hailed as he walked by.

    The father of one had travelled to the United States as a young man in November 1991 in the hope of studying radio and television broadcasting, but his dream could not translate to reality until he was deported after he had spent 10 years and eight months in the country.

    While in the US, he registered a business and had a good clientele base, most of whom were great Nigerian artistes, particularly those of Yoruba extraction, who went to the United States to perform. “I was renting out sound equipment. I arranged sound equipment for Alhaji Sikiru Ayinde Barrister, Shina Peters, Orlando Owoh, Shina Akani, and other Nigerian musicians,” he said.

    Two years after he arrived in the US, he applied for asylum in New York City where he was given an Employment Authorization Card (EAD), which was renewable every year. An EAD was equivalent to the subsidiary protection status of the United Nations Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. With this, he was able to obtain a Social Security Number (SSN), a driver’s licence, and other important documents.

    Armed with the foregoing, he started his educational career at New York City Technical College, Brooklyn, from where he moved to St. Petersburg, FL, and then to Tampa Community College.

    It was at Tampa College that vents began to take an untoward turn.

    He said “I did not complete one college semester in Tampa because of police brutality, abuse of power, and prolonged detention, l had to leave Tampa for Atlanta, Georgia.

    “In Georgia, l applied to Dekalb College now Georgia Perimeter as a transfer student from New York. I was admitted to the Department of Radio and Television Broadcasting.”

    Seeing an opportunity for him to complete his associate degree or apply to university as a transfer student, he applied to Georgia State University and was granted admission.

     “Thereafter, I filed for my adjustment of status with my wife, Rosetta Johnson. While waiting on that, l was introduced to one Joseph Michael Kalady by one of the members of Cherubim & Seraphim Church in Decatur,” he said.

    His dream, he said, was to obtain a degree from Georgia State University. In fact the admission was on because it was intentionally deferred by him. However, at the point of going back to the varsity, he got embroiled in a birth certificate and social security number imbroglio in 2001.

    According to Ahmed, it was not usual among foreigners who did not have proper documents to stay in the US to regularise their stay by hiring professionals, especially, lawyers to perfect their papers.

    Narrating the genesis of his predicament, Ahmed said: “I lived in Atlanta. The lawyer was helping people to obtain US citizenship through the Secretary of Agriculture.

    “That was when I was arrested because unknown to me, the documents the lawyer obtained were false.”

    Although he believed he had no reason to doubt that the papers were genuine as the lawyer was said to have done the job perfectly for others, Ahmed was caught. To worsen matters, it was about the time Ahmed was going to start his education at Georgia State University.

    “When it became apparent that I was in a big mess, rather than go for trial, I decided to go for a plea bargain because it would be less expensive for the state and on my part too because I would not need to hire a private lawye.

    “The deal was six months in prison and three years’ probation,” he said.

    He had spent about five months in detention by the time his case came up for hearing again. To the chagrin of Ahmed, the judge sentenced him to five months imprisonment and ordered him deported.

    Read Also: Germany, Somalia agree to step up deportations

    “I was like why would the judge order me for deportation? According to US law, you have to be charged with judicial deportation.

    “The practice was that the US attorney would inform the commissioner for immigration that they had instituted a judicial deportation. The commissioner for immigration would now come and represent the immigration at the judicial court to see if the crime committed warrants deportation and if that person has a legal status.”

    But Ahmed was not allowed to go back to Atlanta. He filed an appeal with the United States of Court Appeals, but while his appeal was pending, he asked for a change of venue since he had served a five five-month sentence in Chicago. 

    He said: “All proceedings regarding my immigration case were in Atlanta Georgia. That was where my school was, that was where my family was, that was where my business was.

    “I requested a change of venue through Habeas Corpus from the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois Chicago Division.”

    But he said it was as if certain forces were working against him. The first hearing was held on 5/7/2002 by Hon. David H. Coar, but Ahmed was not made available in court by the United States Marshal Service. The same US Marshal had earlier served him the notice of court hearing with the case number as 1;02-cv 02713.

    However, a hearing was held and continued on 6/4/2002 at 9 am, and this was also done in absentia. This time, he had completed his five-month sentencing, and he was not charged for deportation.

    He said: “They refused to take me to court. The judge slated the hearing for June 4, 2002, but a day before the hearing, they just came to pack all of us who were Nigerians from Chicago Illinois prison. We were processed and transported to another state, I believe Ontario, Canada, and to Lagos.

    “We were handcuffed and chained just like in the days of slavery, on a 12-hour flight.”

    Ahmed believes he most probably would not have been deported if he had been given a fair hearing.

    He said: “My resident card was granted by the court but was not given to me by the Tri-County Detention Center officials. My green card was presented for delivery by the postal service three times but was returned to the Attorney General of the United States.”

    From the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, he and his colleagues were taken to Alagbon, Lagos where they stayed for another two days before they were eventually released after serious protests.

    He said: “We had to embark on serious protests before they allowed us to go to our homes.

    “We were there for two days. We asked them to tell us the crime we committed to warrant our detention. We did not commit any crime. They deported us unlawfully and the Nigerian authorities were still detaining us.

    “Some of the deportees have children over there. I don’t think they will ever see their children again. Yet international law says they must give us fair hearing before being deported. It is a conventional protocol.”

    Ahmed’s criminal case is still pending at the United States Court of Appeal.

    Like America like Europe

    If Ahmed’s deportation experience in the United States was bad, the one in Europe was nasty.

    With the bad experience had in the US, he decided to give Europe a try in the hope that things would be better. That was not to be as he had to face harsher treatment in the United Kingdom.

    Refused asylum in Ireland, he decided to try his luck in the UK, where he stayed for a while. His request for asylum would probably have been granted but the lawyer who represented him did not file for judicial review, though Ahmed had told the home office that he had applied for asylum in Ireland.

    In retrospect, Ahmed told The Nation that it was possible that it was his lawyer who told the Nigeria High Commission to issue the Emergency Travel Certificate (ETC) to the then immigration service.

    The authorities in the UK gave him accommodation for a while, and while his application was still being considered, he was told that his case had been posted to the Third Country Unit. They said the person handling his case was on maternity leave, and that when she returned, they would call him for an interview to decide whether he would remain in the UK or be sent back to Ireland. 

    He said: “From the United Kingdom, I travelled to Ireland where I applied for an asylum which was subsequently denied. And, following the failure of my lawyer to submit an application for a judicial review with regards to the aforementioned denial, I travelled back to the United Kingdom where I also applied for asylum, informing the UK immigration of my previous application for asylum in Ireland which was denied.

    “The UK immigration accepted my application and transferred the same to the third country unit where my application was allotted to a female caseworker who was said to be on maternity leave at the time.

    “I was directed to be reporting every week at a police station in London pending the resumption of my caseworker who would interview me before any other proceeding in my case.

    “Unfortunately, while I was waiting for my caseworker to come back from her maternity leave to conduct the said interview, I was detained at the police station at the time I was performing my weekly obligation of reporting.

     “Upon being detained by the UK Border Agency, I filed a judicial review requesting subsidiary protection. The Court of Justice ruled that it could not stop my deportation and that I could go and apply for subsidiary protection in Ireland.

    “I was transported to Ireland without my knowledge of any travel document used in implementing the said deportation to Ireland.

    “On my arrival in Ireland, I was unlawfully detained at Cloverhill Prison in Dublin as an immigration detainee with local prisoners under prison number ‘73356’.

    “I subsequently, under Rule 39, filed an application to stop my deportation with the European Court of Human Rights after which I was visited by an Irish government official alongside a representative of the Nigeria High Commission.

    “During the aforesaid visit, I exhibited a copy of my outstanding petition with the European Court of Human Rights to the visiting staff member of the Nigeria High Commission, asking to be allowed to have my petition resolved by the European Court of Human Rights before any talk on the issuance of Emergency Travel Certificate (ETC) would be necessary.”

    It seemed his predicament had ended when the European Court of Human Rights responded, requesting that he should send certain documents relating to his case within a certain period of time.  However, he observed that the said letter from the European Court of Human Rights was provided to him by a prison official in a cut-opened envelope after the expiration of the deadline given to him by the court to respond.

    He said almost immediately, he was transported to another country, the Netherlands.

    “There, I persistently demanded a copy of the Emergency Travel Document (ETC) which was used by Irish authorities to transport me to the Netherlands.

    “Upon being provided with the same by an Irish official, I discovered that rather than my prison number ‘73356’ in the Ireland, it was my prison number ‘23440’ in the United States of America being noted on the Emergency Travel Document (ETC) which the United States Government used to deport me in 2002, that was noted on the said ETC provided to me by the Irish Government.

    “I believe that it was a copy of the ETC which was issued in the United States in 2002 that the Irish authority was using to effect my deportation in 2011.”

    Upon discovering the aforementioned ETC fraud, Ahmed lodged a formal complaint, attaching a copy of the said ETC, and forwarded the same to the then-Irish Minister of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in Geneva. Unfortunately, he did not get any response from them.

    From the Netherlands, he was transported back to Ireland where he was later transported in a chartered plane alongside other Nigerians to Spain. His instinct told him to protest, but wisdom told him to accept his fate as doing so could spell disaster.

     “We were offloaded into another parked chartered plane loaded with Nigerians from various destinations such as Spain, Germany, and Australia, with whom I was finally deported together to Nigeria.

    “My luggage containing all my personal property, my legal documents including a copy of the very ETC made available to me by an Irish official, was not provided to me as I arrived in Nigeria empty handed!

    “The Secretary of Security and Justice of the Netherlands confirmed in a letter dated March 15, 2012, that my luggage was given to the Irish officials who escorted me out of the Netherlands but the Irish officials failed to give them to me.

    “During processing at the Murtala Muhammad International Airport in Nigeria on arrival, I was shown a different ETC as the ETC which was purportedly used to effect my deportation to Nigeria, evidencing the fact that two different ETCs were used in my deportation.”

    In his quest for justice, he said he visited the Nigeria Immigration Service at Alagbon, Ikoyi, Lagos to request a copy of the very ETC that was shown to him at the Murtala Muhammad International Airport. Unfortunately, the attending immigration officials vehemently refused to provide him with any assistance but rather threatened him with detention if he failed to leave the premises.

    While in Nigeria, sometime in May 2013, he was contacted by one Celestine Anafuwe, the Project Officer for MasterMinds HRSG Consulting, for a three-week programme on ‘Employability and Entrepreneurship skill development’ for deportees, said to be sponsored by the United Kingdom government.

    Ahmed said: “I was motivated to attend the said programme which took place at Alforscar Hotel in Igando area of Lagos State upon being assured that all my concerns about my illegal and ‘fraudulent deportation’ would be addressed by the organisers of the programme.

    “After attending the programme for a week (from June 13, 2013, to June 19, 2013), I decided to quit simply because the programme was not addressing my concerns as promised.”

    However, after he exited the programme, he got to know that a female official in charge of travel documents at the Nigeria High Commission in London, Mrs. Ngere, visited the programme and that she apologised for issuing Emergency Travel Certificates (ETC) which she was not supposed to have issued.   

    In his quest to get justice, he requested from the Nigerian Immigration Service a copy of the Emergency Travel Document which was used by the government of the United States of America and that of the United Kingdom to effect his deportation in 2002 and 2011 respectively, but till date, the said requests are yet to be responded to.

    Grappling with despair, frustration

    As despair and frustration set in, Ahmed was deposed to an affidavit sometime in April 2023. Part of the said affidavit sworn to at the Chief Magistrate Court of Lagos State in the Yaba Magisterial District Holden reads:  “I am facing extreme hardship and poverty since my unlawful deportation from the United Kingdom in 2011.

    “That I am unemployed since both deportations occurred.

    “That I reside with my mother Alhaja W.A Ahmed in the family house.

    “That I only survive from contributions from family members, friends, and other relatives.

    “That I am so poor that I cannot pay for my application fee.

    “That in Nigeria, there is no benefit claim for victims of unlawful deportation.

    “That this affidavit is required for record and official purposes.”

    No hard feelings

    Ahmed is currently working on a project with one of his colleagues with whom he was ‘deported illegally’ from the U.S. They were deported at different periods. While Ahmad’s colleague was deported in 1999, Ahmed was deported in 2002 from the US before they later met again in the U.K.

    Despite his ugly experience, he would not discourage those who still wish to travel abroad not to go. “I would advise those who want to travel abroad to still go because migration is a natural law, it is a natural right, though things have changed in the world now since September 11.

    “The only advice I will give those who want to travel is that before you go, you have to get your status, because back then it didn’t matter if you had status or not. Things are no longer the way they used to be. If you are travelling abroad, plan to get your status.

    “That should be your priority. Make sure they start processing your papers as soon as possible.”

  • Irish students save Nigerian from deportation

    •I am really looking forward to my future here in Ireland, says teenager Muojeke

    BUT for the intervention of his Irish school mates, Nigeria born Nonso Muojeke, 14,would have been deported back home from Ireland  by now.

    The students successfully campaigned to save their classmate from being sent back home, according to The Independent.

    Muojeke, is a student at Tullamore College in County Offaly, where he has lived with his family for the past 11 years.

    His mother was reportedly forced to flee Nigeria after her husband died in 2006, but after their application for asylum was denied the family faced deportation.

    When they heard the news, Nonso’s classmates launched the Save Nonso campaign, gathering supporters from around the world to back the cause and making a video to pressure justice minister Charlie Flanagan into letting him stay.

    Nonso had reportedly been “petrified” at the prospect of leaving Ireland, where he has spent the much of his life.

    The campaign came to a head when the students delivered a petition with 22,000 signatures to Mr Flanagan requesting that the family could be allowed to stay.

    Speaking for the campaign, Nonso’s teacher Joe Caslin said: “Nonso has lived virtually his whole life here – over 11 years.

    “Forcing him to leave the only home he knows will inflict great harm on this young boy.

    “Minister Charles Flanagan has the power to keep Nonso where he belongs – with his friends and community who love and care for him in Tullamore.”

    On Wednesday Nonso, together with his mother Chidiebere and older brother Victor, were granted leave to remain in Ireland.

  • 1000 Nigerians faces deportation from Austria 

    1000 Nigerians faces deportation from Austria 

    About 1000 Nigerians irregular migrants are to be deported back home from Austria, it was learnt.

    The government of Austria said it is in the process of organizing training programmes for the irregular migrants, after which they would be deported back home.

    The country’s Director General, International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD), Michael Spindelegger, who gave the hint Thursday at the meeting with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama, stated that it was to prepare them for gainful employment in Austrian companies to be set up later in the country.

    Spindelegger explained that the proposed programme will facilitate reversed migration of the irregular migrants, who have no likelihood of being given legal residents in Austria.

    He said: “It is a new idea of how to combine future investment in Nigeria with the return of irregular migrants.

    “A lot of companies are interested in investing in Nigeria because of its market. The idea is to train these irregular migrants before repatriating them so that when they come back, they will have something to do instead of becoming liabilities.

    “The idea is also to encourage more Austrian companies to come and invest in Nigeria so that they also could contribute to solving the problem of unemployment and irregular migration.”

    Spindelegger added that there is provision for asylum in Europe but in a situation where an emigrant fails to secure asylum, the person would be deported at the long run.

    “For them, there is no chance of remaining in the country because once they are picked, they would not be allowed to take anything but would be brought back to their country empty.

    “There are about 1000 Nigerians not granted refugees status living in Austria. The programme is starting with Nigeria as a pilot, then, we will see what the experience is before extending it to other countries.”

    He stressed that though only few Austrian companies exist in Nigeria currently, efforts were being made to convince companies involved in the programme to come and invest in Nigeria.

    “It is also part of the programme. They can get benefits from the European Union for the investment, which serves as more business security for Nigerians.

    For Minister Onyeama, the initiative will not only have Nigerians come back home to contribute to national development, the country also stand to benefit from foreign investors.

    On how soon the project will take off, the Minister stated that it will depend on the companies that are part of the programme.

    “It could be companies in Austria that are interested in investing in any sector of Nigerian economy. They would be selecting from Nigerian irregular migrants in Austria, train them and send them down to Nigeria to work with their companies in Nigeria”, the Minister added.
    The Minister however dismisses fears of likely ploy to deport Nigerians in the country through the process.

    “Remember that those Nigerians are in that country illegally, and do not have any prospect of regularizing their stay. As such, they would be deported in any case.

    “So, instead of being deported with the shame that comes with it, they would be given training and guaranteed employment with the companies that would be coming to invest in Nigeria”, he said.

  • 100 Nigerian students face deportation in UK over unpaid scholarships

    100 Nigerian students face deportation in UK over unpaid scholarships

    •High commission steps in

    More than 100 Nigerian students on scholarship in the United Kingdom universities could be deported home as early as this week except their fees are settled immediately, according to The Telegraph of London.

    The students are said to be sponsored by a regional agency and some of them are saddled with debts of up to £20,000.

    The name of the sponsor agency was not given in the report.

    The report described the students as “some of the Nigeria’s brightest undergraduates.”

    They have been told that they will not receive their degree certification even though many of them completed their courses in the last academic year.

    The newspaper said some of the affected students claimed they have been warned they could be deported by Friday, October 20.

    It said the Nigerian High Commission in London confirmed that 152 students had been caught up in the scandal, and that the sponsor agency had been left with a “draught of funding” due to a slump in Nigeria’s oil revenues.

    The High Commission said in a statement that additional funding had been approved for 87 students.

    There was no mention of how soon the bill would be paid.

    The universities of Leeds and Essex said they “sympathised” with the affected students but declined to say whether their visas would be revoked.

    They said that they were working closely with the Nigerian High Commission to resolve the dispute.

    The University of Sussex claimed it had allowed one student to graduate, but declined to comment on whether their transcript had been withheld. It added that it had been providing “some financial assistance for living costs in cases of particular hardship.”

  • Alleged deportation of Nigerian refugees by Cameroon worrisome, says Dabiri-Erewa

    Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora Abike Dabiri-Erewa has described the alleged mass forced return of over 100,000 Nigerian asylum seekers by Cameroonian military as worrisome.

    In a statement by her Media Assistant, Abdur-Rahman Balogun, she decried the inhuman treatment meted out to Nigerian asylum seekers, who were affected by the Boko Haram insurgence in the Northeast.

    Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa noted with concern that despite the friendly disposition between the two countries, the alleged mass forced return of Nigerians was disturbing and calls for concern.

    The Presidential aide said Cameroon should heed the UN’s call on all countries to protect refugees fleeing the carnage in the Northeast Nigeria and not to return them there.

    “This unfriendly attitude of the Cameroonian soldiers to Nigerian asylum seekers is really worrisome,” Dabiri-Erewa said.

    She appealed to Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) as well as other West African regional groups to prevail on Cameroon to be their brothers’ keeper.

    The deportations, according to Human Rights Watch, defied the UN refugee agency’s plea not to return anyone to Northeast until the security and human rights situation has improved considerably.

    The Human Rights Watch had interviewed 61 asylum seekers and refugees in Nigeria about the abuses they faced in Cameroon in June and July of 2017.

    They said soldiers accused them of belonging to Boko Haram or of being “Boko Haram wives” while torturing or assaulting them and dozens of others on arrival, during their stay in remote border areas, and during mass deportations”.

    The report stated that their children, weakened after living for months or years without adequate food and medical care in border areas, died during or just after the deportations, and others said children were separated from their parents.

    An asylum-seeker, who was deported from Mora in March 2017, described how without warning, Cameroonian soldiers rounded up 40 asylum seekers “and severely beat us and forced us onto a bus. They beat some of the men so badly, they were heavily bleeding. When we got to the Nigerian border they shouted ‘Go and die in Nigeria.’”

  • Deportation of Nigerian refugees worrisome – Dabiri-Erewa

    Deportation of Nigerian refugees worrisome – Dabiri-Erewa

    The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora, Mrs Abike Dabiri-Erewa, Friday gave Cameroun a thumps down for the  alleged deportation of over 100,000 Nigerians  from that country.

    Dabiri-Erewa in a statement by her media assistant, Abdul-Rahman Balogun, called the deportation of the Nigerians who fled their homes to escape the Boko Haram insurgency as worrisome and inhuman.

    She said that Cameroon should heed the UN’s call on all countries to protect refugees fleeing the carnage in the North-East of Nigeria and not to return them there.

    “This unfriendly attitude of the Cameroonian soldiers to Nigerian asylum seekers is really worrisome,’’ Dabiri-Erewa said.

    She appealed to Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and other West African regional groups to prevail on Cameroon to be “their brothers’ keeper in a situation like this’’.

    She said that deportations, according to Human Rights Watch, defied UN refugee agency’s plea not to return anyone to North-East of Nigeria until the security and human rights situation had improved considerably.

    The presidential aide said that a 55-page Human Rights report entitled “They Forced Us onto Trucks like Animals: Cameroon’s Mass Forced Return and Abuse of Nigerian Refugees,” condemned the act.

    The report, according to her, states that since early 2015, Cameroonian soldiers had tortured, assaulted, and sexually exploited Nigerian asylum seekers in remote border areas.

    She said that the report added that the soldiers also denied the Nigerians access to the UN refugee agency, and summarily deported, often violently, tens of thousands to Nigeria.

    “It also documents violence, poor conditions and unlawful movement restrictions in Cameroon’s only official camp for Nigerian refugees as well as conditions recent returnees face in Nigeria,’’ she said.

    Dabiri-Erewa said that Cameroon’s forced returns breached UN principles, which prohibited forceful return of refugees and asylum seekers to persecution and, under regional standards in Africa, to situations of generalised violence such as in Nigeria’s North-East.

  • Wife of cancer patient protests ‘unlawful’ deportation

    Wife of cancer patient protests ‘unlawful’ deportation

    A Nigerian, Mrs. Comfort Kehinde Olalere, whose octogenarian husband, Joseph Olaleke is undergoing cancer treatment in the United States, has challenged her deportation.

    Mrs. Olalere, in an April 3 petition by her lawyer, Babs Akinwumi, faulted her deportation of March 17, describing it as “unlawful, degrading and inhuman”.

    The petition was received in the Abuja office of the United States Embassy.

    According to her, she travelled on March 15 to care for her husband “who is undergoing cancer medical therapy in the US” but was subjected to “harrowing and unimaginable treatment” on arriving the Los Angeles International Airport on March 17.

    Mrs. Olalere said she was detained for five hours at the airport on allegations that she overstayed the six months allocated to her when she last visited.

    She said officials of the US Customs and Border Protection, who detained her, ignored her explanation that she did not overstay during her previous visit, but spent five of the six months allocated to her.

    The petition reads: “An official of the Customs and Border Protection, who abused her with racial slurs, told her she could choose to spend five years in jail or being deported for committing no crime.

    “She was ultimately deported illegally to Nigeria. Her two-year valid visa, (Class B1/B2) No: K8005263, issued in Abuja on September 4, 2015, to expire on September 2, 2017, was cancelled”.

    Mrs. Olalere, who faulted the US officials’ claim that she overstayed her previous visit, said she last visited the US on November 29, 2015, and returned to Nigeria on April 26, 2016, though she had a six-month visa. She showed copies of the stamped page of her passport as evidence.

    She urged the US government to investigate the “unfortunate treatment” accorded her and ensure the culprits are penalised.

    Mrs. Olalere also seeks a fresh visa issued to her to enable her visit her ailing husband, who is a legal resident of the USA; payment of her travel expenses by the US government, who must offer an apology, to be published in both print and online media.

    She added that she will explore other appropriate diplomatic channels to register her displeasure and seek redress should the US authorities fail to address her complaints within 14 days.

    Copies of the petition have been sent to the US Secretary of State, Department of States; Nigerian Foreign Affairs Minister, Chairman, Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, Country Representatives, United Nations Human Rights Council, the National Human Rights Commission (Nigeria) and the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora Matters.

  • Wife of octogenarian cancer patient protests deportation

    …Lawyer seeks apology from US’ govt

     

    A Nigerian, Mrs. Olalere Comfort Kehinde, whose octogenarian husband, Mr.Olalere Joseph Olaleke is currently being treated for cancer in the United States, has challenged her deportation from that country.

    Mrs. Olalere, in a petition dated, April 3 by her lawyer, Babs Akinwumi, faulted her deportation on March 17 this year, describing it as “unlawful, degrading and inhuman.”

    She stated, in the petition received at the US embassy in Abuja on April 5, that she travelled on March 15 to care for her husband “who is undergoing cancer medical therapy in the US,’ but was subjected to “harrowing and unimaginable treatment” on arriving the Los Angeles International Airport on March 17.

    Mrs. Olalere said she was detained for five hours at the airport on the allegation that she had overstayed the six month allocated her when she last visited.

    She said officials of the US Customs and Border Protection, who detained her, ignored her explanation that she did not overstay during her previous visit, but only spent five out of the six months allocated her in the US.

    “One of the agents (of the Customs and Border Protection), who has been abusing her with racial slurs, later told her sternly, that she has an option to choose between spending five years in jail in the US or being deported for no criminality at all.

    “She was ultimately deported illegally to Nigeria. Her two-year valid visa, (Class B1/B2) No: K8005263, issued in Abuja on 4th September 2015 to expire on 2nd September 2017, was cancelled,” he lawyer said in the petition.

    Mrs. Olalere, who faulted the US officials’ claim that she overstayed during her previous visit, said she last visited the US on November 29, 2015 and that, although she was given six months, she returned to Nigeria on 26th April 2016. She exhibited copies of the stamped page of her passports as evidence.

    She wants the US Government to investigate the “unfortunate treatment” accorded her and endure that the culprits are penalised to prevent further harassment of other visitors.

    Mrs. Olalere also wants a fresh visa issued to her to enable her visit her ailing husband, who is a legal resident of the USA: the payment of travel expenses by the US Government, who must offer an apology to be published in both print and online media.

    She said she will explore other appropriate diplomatic channels to register her displeasure and seek redress should the US authorities fail to address her complaints within 14 days.

    Copies of the petition have been sent to the US Secretary of State, Department of States; Nigerian Foreign Affairs Minister, Chairman, Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, Country Representatives, United Nations Human Rights Council, the National Human Rights Commission (Nigeria) and the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and Disapora Matters.

     

     

  • 12,000 Nigerians asylum seekers face deportation in Germany

    More than 12,000 Nigerians asylum seekers in Germany may be deported, it was learnt yesterday.
    The Global Head of Programme, Migration and Development at the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, Dr. Ralf Sanftenberg, made the disclosure yesterday when he visited the Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora, Mrs Abike Dabiri-Erewa.
    Sanftenberg said: “We have over 37,000 Nigerians in Germany and more than 12,000 of them are asylum seekers.
    “There is a little chance for their applications to be moved and they may be forced to come back to Nigeria next year.”
    He said 99 per cent of them were likely to be denied asylum status because Nigeria is not among war countries.
    Sanftenberg explained that if they were willing to return voluntarily they would not be forced back or deported but would be assisted through a support programme organised by Germany.
    “We provide services for the retuning migrants in Nigeria, we can provide training for entrepreneurship.
    “We have provided for several other countries in the field of migration policy actually we want to find out to establish migrant services in Nigeria.
    “We are not focusing on returnees, what we are doing is to support the returnees to be reintegrated,” he said.
    Another member of the delegation, who is a consultant to the programme, Ms Stphania Alofokhia-Ghogomu, urged Nigerians seeking asylum in Germany to return home.
    Ms. Alofokhia-Ghogomu, who also a voluntary returnee, said she had spent half of her life in Germany and had to tome come back to contribute to development of Nigeria.
    She said she was helped by the German government to reintegrate when she came back.
    “And that is the situation, though if they chose to come back voluntarily they can get into the reintegrated programmes that are already available for them.
    “But the if they refused to come back voluntarily they will be deported, and if they are deported, they cannot go back to any EU countries in the next five years.
    “That is why it is advised to return voluntarily because they can always apply and go back to the place,” she said.
    Mrs. Dabiri-Erewa hailed German Chancellor Angel Merkel for the way she was addressing the challenge of illegal migrants.
    “So, we will look forward to seeing what you want to do in terms of setting up German migrant services in Nigeria,” She said.
    The presidential aide called on Nigerians facing deportation in Germany to come back home and take advantage of the opportunities provided by German Government to assist them.
    “For Nigerians in Germany who want to return, there is a better place for them at home to help them live a better live.
    “Germany has the ministry of internal affairs and have budget for the returnees, and there are services that will be provided through Germany that they can enjoy,” she said.

  • London court frees James Ibori as deportation hearing begins in Jan.

    London court frees James Ibori as deportation hearing begins in Jan.

    Convicted former Delta State Governor James Ibori has been released from jail despite attempts by the British Home Secretary to detain him further.

    Ibori was due for release on Tuesday, having agreed to be deported after serving half of his 13-year sentence.

    But it became evident that Home Secretary Amber Rudd did not intend to deport Ibori to Nigeria until he handed over £18m of “proceeds of crime”.

    But Justice May said attempts to detain him were “quite extraordinary”, according to a BBC report.

    Ordering Ibori to be immediately freed from prison, Mrs Justice May said: “You don’t hold someone just because it is convenient to do so and without plans to deport them.”

    A Home Office application that Ibori be electronically tagged and subject to strict curfew conditions was also rejected after the judge accepted arguments that the home secretary was attempting to misuse her immigration and deportation powers.

    Ibori, a former London DIY store cashier, was jailed for fraud totalling nearly £50m in April 2012.

    He evaded capture in Nigeria after a mob of supporters attacked police but was arrested in Dubai in 2010 and extradited to the United Kingdom (UK) – where he was prosecuted based on evidence from the Metropolitan Police.

    Yesterday, the Home Office’s barrister said the government was concerned that Ibori might “frustrate confiscation proceedings” and wanted him kept in jail or subject to strict controls on his movement.

    But it emerged in court that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), which is pursuing the confiscation proceedings, was “neutral” about Ibori’s release and possible deportation.

    Ian MacDonald QC, representing Ibori, said: “The Secretary of State has taken it upon herself. There is no objection from (the CPS) for release.”

    “This is extraordinary,” Mrs Justice May said. “They (the CPS) don’t care.”

    “Why doesn’t the Secretary of State just send him back?” she asked. “He wants to go. She wants him to go.”

    Ibori’s conviction followed a UK government anti-corruption campaign led by the Department for International Development (DfID) 10 years ago.

    But earlier this year, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, demanded a review of the evidence following allegations that police took bribes and prosecutors covered it up.

    “The review team found material to support the assertion that a police officer received payment in return for information,” the CPS admitted in September.

     Ibori’s lawyer, Ivan Krolic, explained yesterday in court how another defendant in the fraud case had appealed against conviction on the grounds that “police officers in the investigations had been corrupt”.

    “The court of appeal rejected that after counsel for the Crown indicated that there was nothing to support the allegation,” Mr Krolic explained.

    “And then it turned out there was,” Mrs Justice May interjected. “Yes”, Mr Krolic replied.

    Ordering Ibori’s release, Mrs Justice May said: “The Secretary of State appears to have taken it upon herself that Mr Ibori does remain in this country, in apparent contradiction of the order served earlier this year to deport him.

    “The position of the Secretary of State, as very candidly set out by Mr Birdling (representing the home secretary), is that she accepts that there is an argument that she has no power to detain him.

    “I have decided that the balance of convenience falls heavily in favour of his immediate release.

    “I am not prepared to impose conditions involving tagging or curfews.”

    The judge said the matter of Ibori’s deportation should be heard before the end of January.