Tag: devolution

  • Case for the devolution of power

    SIR: Recently a bill seeking to grant states control over mineral resources within their domain passed the second reading in the House of Representatives. The bill titled “A Bill for an Act to alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to vest the control of the revenues derived from minerals, mineral oils, natural gas in, under or upon any land In the States of the Federation and for Other Related Matters seeks to give much needed realism and impetus to Nigeria’s quest for economic and revenue diversification. The truth is that if Nigeria is to make progress economically and achieve its goal of a sustainably diversified economy and revenue base, then it must reform its political-economic institutions in order to reflect its socio-economic realities and the legitimate aspirations of the different ethnic nationalities that have voluntarily congregated to constitute the Federation known as Nigeria.

    The current quasi-unitary system we currently practice is essentially a system of bondage that has shackled Nigeria’s economic potentials, via the subjugation of its federating units nay states, which otherwise should be the engines and propellers of Nigeria’s march to economic development. Nigeria is currently enmeshed in a recession for which many reasons have been adduced to explain the cause. Of all reasons so far adduced, the most factual and resonating has been that aside the mismanagement and corruption of past thieving administrations, Nigeria remains unhealthily saddled with a deleterious mono-product economy, which is a result of the stifling political and economic system we currently practice. A system that places premium not on productivity and innovation, but on doctored population figures and other Machiavellian schemes designed for the purpose of securing a larger chunk of revenue from the corruptly-termed and dwindling “national cake”.

    It is interesting to also note that in spite of the glaring flaws of our current political-economic system, there are those who opine that Nigeria’s under-development has little to do with the unjust and tragically flawed nature of Nigeria’s political-economic system. They insist that our problems are essentially a function of “poor leadership”. They further assert that all Nigeria needs to reach the Promised Land is “repentance and a change of heart” on the part of our political elite, and the people. The proponents of this school of thought have however failed to ask themselves WHY Nigeria has continually been afflicted with “poor leadership” over the years. Is Nigeria and are Nigerians accursed of God? Are all Nigerians avowed corruption-lovers? The answer to this question is rather obvious: Nigeria’s corrupt political-economic system, as a matter of course, births “poor leadership”, in the same manner as a goat cannot give birth to a lion, neither can an unjust and flawed political-economic system give birth to responsible and accountable leadership.

    The few instances of good governance Nigeria has recorded since the coming into force of this present political-economic system have been nothing but anomalies, this is because the Nigerian state does not have the required mechanisms needed to incentivize or replicate such isolated and rare instances of good governance. There is nothing that incentivizes responsible and accountable leadership in Nigeria. For an average Nigerian elected or appointed public official to muster the will to do the right things he or she must be somewhat of a zealot, with significant political leverage and a singular determination to do what is right and legal, in spite of systemic limitations.

    Whilst appreciative of the critical need for good and purposeful leadership, it is humbly submitted that the long-suffering people of Nigeria can not continue to depend ad infinitum on the emergence of anomalies. We must as a people, nay as a nation, create the requisite political-economic institutions and systems that incentivize good governance, engender social cohesion and advance the economic well-being of all our people, irrespective of the political party or person in power. We must design a system that makes it impossible or at least extremely difficult for the lowest denominators in our polity to emerge as our leaders; and only the reformation of our current political and economic systems will enable that.

     

    • Barrister Ugochukwu Joseph Amasike, 

    Lagos.

  • Legislator calls for devolution of power

    Legislator calls for devolution of power

    Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) member of the House of Representatives Mr. Lanre Odubote has called for devolution of power to the states. He said the lopsided federalism operated by Nigeria has made the federal government to appropriate the powers of the 36 states.

    Odubote, who represents Epe Constituency, also called for state and community police, stressing that the federal police lacked the numerical strength, capacity and resources to properly police Nigeria.

    The legislator, who spoke with our correspondent in Lagos, said much is expected of the National Assembly during the constitution review.

    He said the exercise should reposition Nigeria and foster true federalism, to make it meaningful.

    Odubote said: “The power-loaded federal government is behaving as if the statesd are its appendages. There is the need for decentralisation of powers so that the states can do some things without running to Abuja for approval.

    “One of the issues being debated now is the structure of the police. It has been established that only those who understands the language of a particular community should be posted to the community. Policemen perform better when they know the terrain, not when they are affected by the language barrier.

    “The federal police can remain, but there is the need for governors, who are the chief security officers of their states, to have a measure of control over the police. That is why the governors are proposing a multi-level policing arrangement”.

    Odubote lent his voice to the debate on local government autonomy, saying that the federal constitution has the answer. He explained that, since there are only two levels of governments in federalism, the House of Assembly has reponsibility for the creation and control of the councils.

    He stressed: “There are two tiers of government in federalism. we have the federal level and states which are coordinate with the central government. The states are not the appendages of the federal government. They are coordinate units.

    “Local government exists in the states for easy administration. They are created by the states. It is abnormal to list them in the constitution”.