Tag: dignity

  • Buhari: From Washington with dignity

    Buhari: From Washington with dignity

    It was an official visit that attracted not only national, but also international attention. President Muhammadu Buhari was going to visit the United States of America for four days, on the invitation of President Barack Obama. Was this going to be just another jamboree, or truly an event that would reset the buttons in the relationship between the two countries?

    Sure, there had been some cooling of passion between the two erstwhile allies during the dying days of the Goodluck Jonathan administration, and American experts sent here to train our military had even been asked to leave. She had also refused to sell us Cobra helicopters and other armaments, which could have made a lot of difference in our fight against insurgents in the North-east of the country. America had cited some reasons, including alleged human rights violations. The then President  Jonathan was thus forced to look towards South Africa for arms. He loaded millions of dollars in a private jet as if going to Oyingbo market, and got his fingers burnt in the process. South Africa seized the cash, and also impounded the aircraft for some time. The Nigerian government could only huff and puff for a while, and then licked its wounds quietly.

    No doubt, the kiln of passion needed to be kindled anew between Nigeria and America, and the invitation extended to President Buhari during the G7 Summit in Germany in June, was a much needed elixir. The Nigerian leader accepted the offer, and so was in Washington between Sunday, July 19 and Wednesday, July 22.

    But another whiff of controversy had presaged the meeting. America, through its Supreme Court, had recently legitimized same sex relationship. A man could marry a man if he wanted, while a woman could also marry a woman. It was against the laws of God, but heck, what did America care? God was either dead due to old age, or now belongs to the old school.  What matters now are rights, and people with homosexual or lesbian cravings must have their rights protected under the law.

    It was into the eye of this storm that some Nigerians felt President Buhari would be flying, on his trip. True, he had been asked to bring a ‘wish list’ by his host, but is there ever free lunch in America? Yes, your wish would be granted. America would help you decapitate Boko Haram, would help you trace and repatriate billions of dollars salted away in foreign banks by past rulers, would help boost your economy and generate employment, but at what price? At a price of endorsing same sex marriage, which would be contrary to our laws as a country, and to the laws of the God that majority of Nigerians believe in, and serve? Would President Buhari capitulate simply because America would help him fulfill promises he made during election campaigns?

    To America we flew last Sunday, arriving after a voyage of 12 hours. Our President was accommodated along with some members of the entourage at the historic Blair House, just a peeping distance from the White House. A good number of meetings were to hold at that Blair House in the next four days.

    You would be permitted if you had jet lag after 12 hours in the air, punctuated only by a one hour technical stopover at a Portuguese island called Santa Maria, to refuel your plane. But President Buhari was still spry enough to settle down to business immediately. We have heard of the work rate of former Army General and later civilian president, Olusegun Obasanjo. Now we see another retired Army General now civilian president, exhibiting the same horsepower work ethics. Could it be true that they give them some injections in the military, which makes them go on and on? Well, I did not say so. I only heard of it.

    After a briefing of what was to come in the next four days by Professor Ade Adefuye, Nigerian Ambassador to the United States of America, the President played host to former American Ambassador in Nigeria, Thomas Pickering and Professor Jean Herskovits. The man who has been quite outspoken about Nigeria, and who had doubted if the country would survive the 2015 general elections, Ambassador John Campbell, also came, among other people.

    The day was not done until Madeline Albright (remember her? A large number of people across the world were mad about Madeline years back when she was American Secretary of State. She did the work admirably).  Well, Madeline came to dinner with our President. She has aged, but rather gracefully.

    Day 2 was the day the world had been waiting for. Day of meeting with the world’s most influential president, Barak Obama. But not so fast! First, breakfast with the Vice President, Joe Biden. Venue was the Naval Observatory, which is the official residence of the American number 2 man. What did he tell our President?

    Biden gave an overview of the objectives of the entire visit,assuring Nigeria of the goodwill  and support of America. He shared perspectives on the terror war, drawing from America’s experiences after the September 2001 assault, in which thousands were killed by Al-Qaeda inspired terrorists. He said Boko Haram, which has now pledged loyalty to ISIS, should not be battled with just military option. There was also the need to combine the war with strong socio-economic programs. He said the U.S would be ready to work with Nigeria in that direction.

    On the Nigerian economy, Biden bade the leadership to tackle the issue of corruption, strengthen the institutions, and appoint tested hands to man critical sectors. If all these were done, he assured that investors would flood Nigeria in droves.

    President Buhari thanked his host, and added that the role played by America prior to general elections, sending Secretary of State John Kerry to convey that America would not tolerate the subversion of the people’s will, went a long way to guarantee fairness and justice.

    Having served as Minister for Petroleum Resources for over three years in the 1970s, President Buhari did not forget to mention the oil sector. He said between 10 to 20 billion dollars may have been lost to oil theft in the past one year, and pledged to sanitize the sector. He welcomed American assistance.

    The much awaited meeting with President Obama came up a while later at the White House. American leaders have been known to be fairly parsimonious with praises, particularly when talking about leaders of other countries. But Obama was effusive. He described President Buhari as a man of integrity, needed for such a time as this in Nigeria. He congratulated him for winning the March 2015 presidential election, adding that Nigeria was very important to Africa. The destiny of the continent was tied to Nigeria’s, he said, pledging that America would continue to support, as long as Nigeria does the right things.

    Every patriotic Nigerian must have stood several feet taller, as Obama eulogized our President. It served to rekindle confidence in our country. With the right leadership, Nigeria can, and will get there. Sure.

    The American president charted the same course as his deputy on the issue of Boko Haram. According to him, economic and social programs must run concurrently with military option, to conclusively defeat insurgency.

    Obama said the diversity of Nigeria, rather than be a centrifugal force, must be a centripetal one. The disparate parts of the country should be harnessed to become source of strength, adding that no part of the country should be left behind, or alienated.

    Buhari, the American president observed, was hugely popular, judging by the enormous goodwill that surrounded his election. He urged him to use the goodwill to serve Nigeria, alongside the governors that accompanied him. The governors are Rochas Okorocha, Imo, Adams Oshiomhole, Edo, Tanko Al-Makura, Nasarawa, Kashim Shettima, Borno, and Abiola Ajimobi, Oyo.

    Speaking on behalf of the governors, Okorocha assured Obama that the states’ helmsmen would back up Buhari to bring enduring change to Nigeria.

    President Obama made pledges. America would help Nigeria in diverse ways: checkmate insurgency, train and equip her military, recover monies siphoned out of federal coffers, and many others. And with no strings attached.

    The bilateral meetings/ audiences with the Nigerian president at Blair House, and other venues, were worth their weight in gold. The American Secretary of Commerce met with the Nigerian team, so did Loretta Lynch, U.S Attorney General, Jack Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, the Barker Group, potential investors in the Agriculture and Power sectors. There was an interactive dinner hosted by U.S Chamber of Commerce and Corporate Council for Africa, and captains of industry from Nigeria and America were there, among others.

    What of the meeting with Dr Pate of the World Health Organization (WHO), representatives of the World Bank, and  of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Refreshing. WHO unfolded plans to spend 300 million dollars to fight malaria in Nigeria, while the World Bank, subject to ratification by its board of directors, will make available the princely sum of  2.1 billion dollars for the rebuilding of infrastructure in the North-east, a region beleaguered by insurgency in the past six years. The fund, under the auspices of International Development Agency (IDA) will be made available as loans for Nigeria, at very low interest rates. The first 10 years would be interest free, while an additional 30 years would be granted at rates lower than that of the capital market.

    A delighted President Buhari said priority would be given to the resettlement of more than one million internally displaced persons (IDPs), and directed that a team be set up on the side of the Federal Government, which would meet and harmonize plans with the World Bank team as soon as possible.

    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also disclosed plans to work with the Dangote Foundation to ensure that Nigeria gets a clean bill of health on polio. Already, no case of polio has been recorded in the country for a full year, and if the position subsists for another full year, Nigeria would be declared polio free.

    Cheery news also from the session between the Nigerian team and the American Attorney General. The host country would track illicit money from Nigeria in all their jurisdictions, including the U.S, while training would also be provided for our judicial officers, prosecutors, police, and other security agencies, to track and recover stolen funds.

    There were other bilateral meetings with John O. Brennan, Director of the CIA and Deputy Secretary of Defence, Robert Work, and Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen Martin Dempsey.

    Oh, the courtesy call by the Class of 1980 of the United States War College, in which the then Col Muhammadu Buhari participated, and got glowing recommendations. It was a time to go down memory lane.

    Same sex issue enters the scene. On Tuesday afternoon, President Buhari was in his right elements, as he attended a joint session by the Senate and House Committees on Foreign Affairs at the Capitol Hill. Many issues came up for discussion, ranging from foreign relations, to growing democracy, human rights, and many others. Then a senator brought in the clincher. What does Nigeria think of the rights of homosexuals and lesbians.

    Sodomy or anything of such kind is against the laws of Nigeria, and, indeed, the Nigerian society abhors such practices, the President declared. Pastor Tunde Bakare of The Latter Rain Assembly was in the audience, and from the delight on his face, he could have carried the President shoulder high, if protocol had permitted such.

    To cap that delightful day, the president headed to the Chancery, Nigeria Embassy. He had two assignments there. A Meet and Greet session had been packaged by Mo Abudu of Ebony Life TV, in which Nigerian youths, who are professionals, had been invited from across America to greet President Buhari, and share their dreams of a greater country with him. The young people were really happy to have their president and father figure in their midst.

    Next was the meeting with Nigerians in Diaspora, who also came from across America. Biodun Ogunjobi had driven 12 hours to attend the event. He alo had waited for four hours outside the Embassy gates, till the program commenced. Such is the fervor Nigerians in America have for their country, and for a president they see as symbol of change. For about two hours, the President interacted with them, answering all the questions.

    The night did not end without the president meeting with the All Progressives Congress (APC) members in USA and Canada. The previous day, the party members had massed at the gate of Blair House, bearing different placards hailing President Buhari. When he saw them, he got down from his vehicle to greet them. The gesture drew sustained applause.

    On the final day of the visit, it was an interactive event at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP).  It was jointly organized by the National Democratic Institute, International Republican Institute, Centre for Strategic Studies and Atlantic Council. Ambassador Johnny Carson, who coordinated the session, described the guest as a man of honour and integrity. The event included a question and answer session, a round table discussion, and a presentation by the Nigerian president. And did the man sparkle? In fact, so remarkable was that outing that Pastor Bakare told this writer: “He obviously left the best for the last. That was simply brilliant.”

    President Buhari went to America, he saw, and he conquered. As I watched him signing the Visitors’ Register as he attempted to leave that historic monument called Blair House, I wondered how many people in the world would ever have such privilege. Not many. An American official had given him a pen, and the president wrote for about three minutes. He also must have been effusive in his appreciation. When he finished, he read over what he had written, put the pen back in its casing, rose, and handed it to the American official. That one collected it, and solemnly handed it back to the Nigerian president as a gift. Very solemn. And moving.

    As President Buhari strode out of Blair House for the last time, with his entourage in tow, one could see that an invisible Nigerian flag had been hoisted in the Amrican sky, and it was fluttering proudly. The Nigerian president had come with dignity, attended all the sessions lined up for him, not missing a single one,  and was returning home with an enhanced reputation, not just for himself but also for about 170 million of his country men and women. Who says change will not come to Nigeria?

     

    • Adesina is Special Adviser, Media and Publicity, to President Buhari
  • Protecting dignity of woman

    Protecting dignity of woman

    Members of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) community in Awka, the Anambra State capital, have held a special session to celebrate female academic and non-academic staff. FRANKLIN ONWUBIKO (Mass Communication) reports.

    It was a remarkable moment at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) in Awka, the Anambra State capital, as wife of the Vice-Chancellor, Dr Gladys Ahaneku, led academic and non-academic staff to celebrate the university’s Women Day.

    The university auditorium was draped in colourful ribbon for the event. It was filled to the brim. The women, who came for the event, spilled over the hall. The event began with the arrival of the principal officers led by the Vice-Chancellor (VC), Prof Joseph Ahaneku. Other dignitaries included the Deputy Vice-Chancellor for Academics, Prof Charles Esimone and Registrar, Mr C.C. Okeke, among others.

    The VC described the ceremony as a good step for UNIZIK women, urging them to lead an exemplary life to shape the characters of students. While advising women to always demonstrate their capacity and competence in their disciplines, Prof Ahaneku urged them not to be intimidated by their male counterparts.

    The guest lecturer and a senior lecturer at the Faculty of Law of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), Dr Edith Nwosu, urged the women to strive for society’s growth by exploring their innate potential. She enjoined them to follow the footprints of accomplished women so as to make positive impact on humanity.

    Earlier, Dr Ahaneku said the event was borne out of the vision to awaken the spirit of women in the university to realise their potential.

    According to her, the institution is getting accolades for its growth and developing new frontiers to ensure even development. The success of the last two years, she said, could be attributed to the astute leadership and proper management of the university.

    On the need for the university women to maintain unity for the purpose of contributing their quota to the daily success of the school, Dr Ahaneku said: “We went to other institutions and made inquiries. We found out that strong and vibrant women associations exist to complement the managements’ efforts towards development.”

    She added that the aim of the association was geared towards the transformation of the university as well as creating a platform for the women working in the institution to interact and socialise.

    In her poetic rendition, a former Head of Department of Igbo, African and Asian Studies at UNIZIK, Prof Nkechinyere Nwokoye, charged the women to always stand up and protect their rights. She said there is dignity in being a woman.

    Speaking to our reporter, some of the participants described the event as one which rekindled their spirits towards service to the school and the nation. They praised the VC’s wife for taking a bold step to revive an event after many years it had been stopped.

    Mrs Ify Obi, Station Manager of UNIZIK 94.1FM, hailed Dr Ahaneku, describing her as a woman of humility, who she said has passion to project and protect the interest of women working in the university.

     

  • An institutionalised assault on human dignity

    An institutionalised assault on human dignity

    A Commissioner of Police was gunned down just yards from his home. A rising artist was the victim of cult rivalry. Kidnappers are having a field day in all regions of the land. And while Boko Haram still beheads and maims, we are seeking amnesty for the yet unrepentant sect. Even when there are genuinely uplifting stories such as the one that was the subject of this column last week, the disgusting nature of the sad ones can overwhelm. They are the ones that catch the attention of outsiders, including those that we need for investment. Thus Nigeria has again made the United States “travel advisory list” countries. So, while foreign students flock to Ghana on Summer Study Abroad programmes, they would have nothing to do with Nigeria.

    Thomas Hobbes’s social contract theory characterises the state of nature as the hellish situation that motivates the creation of the political state. For him, a political state is morally justified to impose obligations on members because, given the egoistic, calculating, acquisitive and possessive character of human nature, life without such a state would be nasty, brutish, and short. It is in recognition of this tragic reality in the state of nature without political authority that rational human beings would agree to combine their resources to establish a political state with authority.

    A standard textbook critique of Hobbes is that since philosophy is a reflection on experience, and since the only experience that Hobbes had was with his native 17th century England, his theory must be limited in its applicability. And in this part of the world, our first generation political leaders used to remind the Western world of the paradise on earth that was traditional Africa. Leopold Senghor and Mwalimu Julius Nyerere are only two of the most outspoken defenders of an African heaven on earth that was disturbed by the marauding forces of imperialism. They presented the West as the bedrock of individualistic dog-eat-dog mentality.

    Two questions arise: First, how much difference is there between African and Western value systems? Second, are African societies exempt from the state of nature account?

    With regard to the first question, I contend that a genuine comparison of Western and African value systems must take place at the same level: traditional values with traditional values and “modern” values with “modern” values. The traditional is an endangered species in both contexts. Therefore all we have for genuine comparison is the modern version of our value systems. In this, it’s clear that there is no difference in kind between the values that motivate an American in New York and what enervates a Nigerian in Lagos.

    The difference is in the constraint in the way of each. The New Yorker wants what Michael Jordan has. He knows if he tries to ambush MJ to rob him of his property, the law will quickly catch up with him. So he refrains from that option and tries to work hard at improving his basketball skills. Otherwise, he’d just have to limit his ambition. Of course, there are daredevils who would try an ambush and risk going to jail. That’s what prisons are for and there are plenty of them, including the maximum securities.

    On the Nigerian side, while the values are not different, the contexts cannot be more diametrically opposed. The opportunities that exist for the New Yorker are hardly there for the majority of Nigerians. So with similar ambitions, the opportunities are quite dissimilar.

    In such a circumstance, there is a need for even a greater focus on constraints. Make crime so unrewarding that people without opportunities would not be lured into a life of crime. Unfortunately, however, no state in Nigeria has what any of its US counterparts has. In addition to, or perhaps because of the opportunities that are made available for those who care to take advantage, the security system is effective in the US. In Nigeria, however, a state is not in charge and cannot effectively secure itself. Therefore there is little or no check on a would-be criminal in a world without opportunities. This is what the state of nature account depicts: where human nature is as described, and there is no effective authority to constrain individuals, it would be a war of all against all.

    My second question pertains to the applicability of the state of nature account to Nigeria and other African countries. To be sure, Hobbes is not the only contract theorist with an account of the state of nature as its basis. John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau provide their own accounts. But while Locke’s state of nature is not as dire as Hobbes, Rousseau’s is the most idyllic. For Rousseau, the state of nature is a state of peace and innocence; what is missing there is the moral virtue of citizenship. For Locke, the state of nature is a state of peace, where anyone can punish violators of the laws of nature. What is missing is the impartiality of an independent magistrate. Hobbes is the most realistic of the three.

    Hobbes’s realism is in recognising, even as our traditional thinkers do, that no one is beyond criminality if they think they can get away with it. That’s why humans are not saints. This is why, wherever human life is valued, and human dignity is respected, it is protected against abuse by a code of laws that is systematically enforced.

    Cultism is alive and well in Nigeria. We even idolise the cultists and we are not ashamed of the implications for the country’s profile of sharing horrific images of their decapitation in the hands of rivals on the front pages of our national newspapers. A state governor made a succinct observation early this week on the pattern. Two days later a national paper featured another grisly image of the shattered face of a human being.

    We may pretend as we want; but there is no denying the fact that our present situation is that of a genuine state of nature unlike any that the philosophers imagined. In another pathetic narrative, a woman who lost three children to Boko Haram gunmen who also forced her into widowhood overnight recently brought tears to the faces of prominent men and women. They wondered what kind of a people we are and what kind of nation would allow the dignity of humans to be so sullied. We have resources to squander but not enough to provide security for citizens. This is contrary to reason. But reason assumes we value human life; the truth is that we don’t.

    Which brings me to the question: What values do we really espouse? Does it make sense for us to continue to demean Western individualistic values when we don’t even approximate the value Westerners place on human lives? We do not make provisions for bringing our children to their God-given potentials. We neglect the aged and the homeless; and we make no provision for widows while those without children are on their own. Poverty eradication programmes for the poor have become wealth enhancing programmes for the rich. Our religions place premium on the poor. But our clerics now preach the gospel of wealth; and so, armed bandits and assassins prowl for their own share, without restraint.

    Who will save us from our home-grown inhumanity and devastating assault on human dignity? Who will offer the Change that we desperately need?