Tag: Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN)

  • Atiku faces uphill task at tribunal, says Agbakoba

    National Intervention Movement Co-chairman, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), yesterday said Alhaji Atiku Abubakar faces an uphill battle to overturn Presidential Muhammadu Buhari’s victory at the Election Petition Tribunal.

    According to him, it has to be proven that there were electoral irregularities and that they affected the election results.

    Agbakoba, a Life Bencher who chairs the Peoples Trust Party (PTP) and the “third force political parties”, said he was misquoted in his earlier statement to say that Atiku would lose at the Tribunal.

    “That is far from the truth. I meant the former Vice President will face an uphill task, given the circumstances of challenging the election results.

    “My initial decision to charge the former Vice President not to go to court is based on the fact that President Buhari has subverted the Supreme Court by the removal of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen, and the appointment of the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria.

    “My perception is that we need to resolve the status of the Supreme Court. I wonder what is taking the National Judicial Council so long.

    “I am also worried about the historical precedent, as no petition on presidential election result has ever succeeded.

    “As one of Nigeria’s experienced election petition lawyers, I know that the burden of proof to succeed in an election petition is unfairly huge.

    “We first have to prove that there are electoral irregularities and in my view, once you prove this, you should succeed.

    “Unfortunately, even if you prove electoral irregularities you will have to show how that affected the results of the election.

    “Remember that the gap between former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar and President Buhari is about four million votes,” Agbakoba said.

    The former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President believes the presidential election results were “manifestly riddled” with electoral irregularities.

    He, however, emphasised that Atiku is constitutionally entitled to approach the tribunal.

    “My personal advice has become irrelevant. I fully support and wish former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar every success,” Agbakoba said.

    In the earlier statement urging Atiku not to challenge Buhari’s victory, Agbakoba said: “I understand the PDP is aggrieved about the outcome of the election and alleged massive irregularities. But, I urge former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar not to approach the Election Petition Tribunal.

    “He might have moved backwards by his loss but he should not lose sight of the legacy and greatness that lies in front of him. He is in a strong position to take up the mantle of a statesman.

    “He can build a new Nigeria movement from the motley of small parties, third force actors, change actors and millions who are desperate for a strong, united Nigeria.”

  • Agbakoba to PDP candidate: don’t challenge Buhari’s victory

    National Intervention Movement Co-chairman Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) yesterday urged Alhaji Atiku Abubakar not to challenge his loss to Presidential Muhammadu Buhari at the Election Petition Tribunal.

    He said Atiku should rather take up the mantle of a statesman and build a new Nigeria movement.

    Agbakoba, who chairs the Peoples Trust Party (PTP) and the “third force political parties”, decried the fact that the voting pattern for the 2019 presidential election showed that ethnicity played a significant role.

    He said in a statement: “President Buhari kept his base in the North while Atiku Abubakar largely held his base in the South.

    “The All Progressive Congress (APC) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) benefited from primordial voting. The excepted zone is the Southwest where voting occurred on the basis of issues.

    “The significance and consequence of the 2019 presidential election is huge, unless we are able to reverse it. The 2023 presidential election will follow the pattern of 2019 unless we do something about it.

    “I understand the PDP is aggrieved about the outcome of the election and alleged massive irregularities. But, I urge former Vice President Atiku Abubakar not to approach the Election Petition Tribunal.

    “He might have moved backwards by his loss, but he should not lose sight of the legacy and greatness that lies in front of him. He is in a strong position to take up the mantle of a statesman.

    “He can build a new Nigeria movement from the motley of small parties, third force actors, change actors and millions who are desperate for a strong, united Nigeria.”

    According to the former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president, there is also a lot of work to be done in both political and electoral reforms.

    “I can see how tempting it is to take the option of the Election Petition Tribunal, but that in my view is not the right decision.

    “We look forward to a new Nigeria, strong and united; a new Nigeria that will not vote on the basis of ethnic and primordial sentiments.

    “I was shocked at the strength of the two parties in holding their respective bases. But the problem was that the basis was simply primordial and not driven by issues,” he said.

    Activist-lawyer Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa said the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) must tame what he called the antics of politicians and their desperation.

    To him, the crude quest for power across the divide “is simply sickening”.

    He said INEC must rise to the occasion to leverage on presidential election experience to improve on the forthcoming governorship and Houses of Assembly election.

    The senior lawyer urged those with grievances to embrace due process of law.

    “INEC having declared winners for the elections – no matter the merits or otherwise, the options available should be exhausted through due process of law. We have no choice than that noble option, in the interest of our dear nation.

    “If we can conduct the March 9 elections without shedding the blood of any Nigerian, then we would have fulfilled the lofty expectations of our heroes past,” Adegboruwa said.

  • Agbakoba: Restructuring possible without constitution amendment

    National Intervention Movement Co-chairman Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) Tuesday said the country can be restructured administratively pending constitution amendment.

    According to him, while restructuring, which he described as power transfer “from exclusive Federal list to concurrent state list” will involve constitutional alteration, administrative devolution of powers could be deployed in the interim.

    He said it will involve administrative transfer of power from the centre to states pending constitutional power devolution.

    This, he said, will be a temporary measure before constitutional restructuring.

    “The Federal Government can administratively devolve powers to states by Executive Order,” Agbakoba said.

    The former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President, who chairs the Peoples Trust Party (PTP), spoke at a briefing in Lagos.

    Agbakoba, who also chairs the third force political parties, said restructuring should be top on the list of political agenda.

    “The Constitution requires that two-thirds of the 36 states, the Federal Government and the National Assembly participate in restructuring. That may take a bit of time.

    “There are things that can be done immediately through administrative restructuring. The Federal Government can make statutory transfers to the states.

    “For example, the President can receive money for a Federal road in Anambra and transfer the money to the state government to execute

    “There are so many things the Federal Government is doing. You see Minister of Transport Rotimi Amaechi and his power, works and housing counterpart Babatunde Fashola (SAN) everywhere, up and down. But there are commissioners of works.

    “The Federal Government can prepare the budgets, because under the Constitution, the Federal Government does roads. But if they budget for a particular road and it is touching two states – Lagos and Oyo for instance, you can call the governors and give them the money.

    “That way, you begin to free yourself from the challenges of a big federation. If we do this, we’ll see substantial change,” Agbakoba said.

    The SAN called for a national order, which he described as a stable arrangement of systems, as opposed to social chaos as seen in existing structures.

    “It is crucial to stabilise our national disunity. This is why restructure is vital. Examples of national order include: the treaty of Westphalia, the treaty of Vienna, the League of Nations, and Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) etc. In Nigeria, there is none. This is a big issue.

    “Without resolving issues around a stable national order, Nigeria will continue to be disunited. And we cannot move. This, therefore, is issue No.1 – the Big Issue,” he said.

    Tied to political devolution, Agbakoba said, is the notion of strengthening institutions.

    To him, the Federal Government is weak because it is made up of weak institutions.

    He suggested the adoption of Chapter 9 of the South African Constitution, so that institutions such as the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the Police, anti-graft agencies, Judiciary, Accountant General, among others, are assured to work free of interference.

    This, he believes, will limit impunity and improve independent action, as according to him, “strong institution is a critical big issue for good governance”.

    Agbakoba described the justice sector as dead, adding that legal failure has had massive impact on economic development.

    “The legal and justice sector has suffered institutional failure over the last three decades. Comprehensive and radical reform of the legal and justice sectors is overdue. The rule of law is vital to economic development. But lip service is paid to this vital process.

    “Investors, whether local and international, will not invest in a lawless country. We must give urgency to this sector and reverse legal failure. A speed of justice strategy will reduce delays.”

    On the way out, he called for new methods of dispute resolution, such as Alternative Dispute Resolution, small claims courts, traditional and customary arbitration, as well as a major centre for investment disputes resolution.

    He advocated the establishment of quasi-judicial sector-based administrative tribunals, following the UK example.

    “In England there exist many administrative courts to cover telecommunications, taxation, transportation, insurance, education, financial services, trade, investments, etc.

    “The impact on Nigeria will be enormous as consideration may be given to devolving judicial power from Federation to state level,” he said.

    Agbakoba said the government must pay attention to the three critical policies of economic governance: monetary, fiscal and trade.

    On monetary policy, he called for a reduction of lending rates to single digit to encourage business growth. To him, borrowing at 20 per cent is crazy.

    On fiscal policy, Agbakoba advocated the expansion of money supply to meet expenditure and other needs –without which government cannot fund its money requirements.

    He said import substitution should be used to encourage local industries, adding that the notion of fair trade is vital to protect industries and help them grow.

    “The priority of economic governance is to diversify the economy and make it less dependent on imports. Nigeria has long depended on crude oil as if it is the only hydrocarbon to the utter neglect of gas.

    “The economy heavily relies on oil revenue and is vulnerable to price shocks in oil and the associated risk to national stability. The most recent volatility in oil prices suggest that we must start to diversify our revenue income streams by developing non-oil tradable sectors.

    “A clear strategy, model and plan for economic diversification both horizontally and vertically is necessary. Horizontal diversification should explore new opportunities in the same oil and gas sector,” Agbakoba said.

     

  • Agbakoba sues govt for excluding Southeast from NNPC board appointments

    Agbakoba sues govt for excluding Southeast from NNPC board appointments

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has sued the Federal Government over alleged violation of the Federal Character principle in the composition of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) board.

    He said none of the persons appointed to fill the nine positions is from the states that make up the Southeast geopolitical zone.

    According to Agbakoba, more than one person was appointed from other geo-political zones in violation of the Constitution.

    Members of the board include Dr Tajuddeen Umar (Northeast), Dr. MaikantiBaru (Northeast), Mr. Abba Kyari (Northeast), Mr. Mahmoud Isa-Dutse (North Central), Mallam Mohammed Lawal and Mallam Yusuf Lawal (both Northerners).

    Others are Dr. Emmanuel Ibe Kachikwu (South-South), Dr. Thomas M.A John (South-South), and Dr. Pius Akinyelure (South-West).

    “The reason for the action (lawsuit) is that the Federal Government has always discriminated against Nigerians indigenous to the states in the Southeast zone in the appointments into the board of the second respondent (NNPC).

    “The Federal Government, by the lopsided appointment, accords numerical advantage to states in other geo-political zones to the detriment of the applicant’s Southeast geopolitical zone that is totally excluded from the board of the second respondent,” he said.

    According to him, Section 42 of the 1999 Constitution guarantees the right of every citizen to freedom from discrimination.

    Agbakoba said the Constitution also “prohibits any administrative or executive action of the government or application of any law in force in Nigeria discriminating between Nigerians or accords any privilege or disability to any Nigerian, on account of ethnicity, state of origin, etc.”

    Attorney-General of the Federation, NNPC and the Federal Character Commission are the respondents in the suit filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Agbakoba is seeking a declaration that the distribution of appointment into the NNPC’s Board made on July 5 last year violates the principle of democracy, social justice and Federal Character prescribed by Section 14(1) and (13) of the 1999 Constitution.

    He is praying for an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Federal Government from further violation of the Constitution and other laws including the Federal Character Commission (Establishment, etc.) Act in appointment of NNPC board members.

    He further asked for an order of perpetual injunction directing the Federal Government to henceforth apply the constitutional principles of democracy, social justice and all laws relating to Federal Character, including the Federal Character Commission (Establishment, etc.) Act in appointing NNPC board members.

  • NBA presidency: Agbakoba rejects call for fresh election

    NBA presidency: Agbakoba rejects call for fresh election

    Former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has rejected a call for a fresh election by Chief Joe-Kyari Gadzama (SAN).

    Former Kano State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) was declared winner of the NBA election held last weekend.

    He polled 3,055 votes to beat Gadzama, who scored 2,384 votes out of 5,439 votes cast.

    But the Gadzama Campaign Organisation rejected the result, calling for its immediate cancellation “for failing to be credible, transparent, free and fair and for failing to comply with the provisions of the NBA Constitution and the electoral guidelines.”

    Calling for fresh elections, the organisation said collation was done in secrecy, and accused outgoing NBA President, Augustine Alegeh (SAN) of partisanship.

    Agbakoba, in a statement, said virtually every NBA election has been criticised for being unfair, adding that he could, however, not recall any case where a loser called for cancellation.

    “As a former NBA President, I urge the Gadzama Campaign Organisation to take the election results in good faith. It will not be in our interest to create challenges for our association. The newly introduced electronic voting system may have had challenges but it was an innovative easy voting procedure.

    “I understand the reaction of the campaign organisation. However, it is important to protect the integrity of NBA. At this stage, what we need as an association is unity. I appeal to the Gadzama Campaign Organisation to accept the election results in good faith and accept A. B. Mahmoud, SAN, as our new President,” Agbakoba said.

  • Agbakoba  scores confab below average

    Agbakoba scores confab below average

    Former President of the Nigerian Bar Association and a member of the ongoing National Conference, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has scored the confab below average in terms of performance.

    In a chat with The Nation, Agbakoba said participating in the confab has been very revealing, but regrettably, nothing massive has come out of it.

    He frowned at the extension of the conference by four weeks, stating that if the confab manages its time very well, it can conclude its assignment within the originally allotted time.

    Agbakoba said: “The National Conference in my view  has offered Nigerians the opportunity to revisit their relationship with one another, that is the main purpose. Forget the fact that people said that the President could not summon it, the fact is that we are there. The conference is really very revealing, it reveals the great  division in Nigeria. There is a massive divide between the various ethnic groups in the country.

    “On whether the conference is going to be transnational, Agbakoba said: “I don’t think so because we are still caught in the web of massive ethnic, religious issues. So you find for instance, the Southwestern  zone appearing to be  the most dynamic and the most transnational on all the key issues. Issues about how Nigeria can move forward, the most key issue is that of regional autonomy. They  have been  the most  forthcoming on it. The North has been a bit conservative in the sense that they would rather retain the system but If I  may ask, don’t they know that the system has not worked.

    The former NBA boss said: “In the context of the southeast, surprisingly, I have failed to see a coherent and conducive policy of transformation coming  out of the Southeast. Southsouth  has canvassed the issue of resource control.

    “So that has been the general setting. For me on one hand I will express relief that after the initial confrontation with Lamido’s out burst, we have been able to talk, we have been able to get the committees to submit their interim report, so that should be applauded. But what is most important is whether these deliberations will not become another talk shop. The challenge is who is going to use the outcome of the deliberations.

    On his rating of the work of the conference so far, Agbakoba said: “My rating of our work so far is just  below average, it is important that the outcome of the conference should be converted.”

    Concerning whether there should have been an extension of the conference  Agbakoba said: “I don’t think so because the conference can be better managed in terms of time. For those of us who declined to have remunerations,  to add four weeks  is just  further personal expenses,  maybe some like the extension because of the remunerations.

    I don’t know, but  I think that we have enough time to come and conclude our work within the originally allotted time. The problem is that too many delegates want to  grandstand because the media is there, but if the media can go and we settle down because right now the media is not contributing anything. A lot of delegates want to stand up and talk because the media is there, but if the media is out and we review very carefully the way we can manage time. There is really nothing because when you look at the interim reports,  we  have only four committees with controversial issues namely the committee on the devolution of powers, committee on political restructuring in Nigeria, committee on fiscal federalism, committee on religion. The other committee’s  work are not  really controversial. The confab has been eye opening, revealing but surprisingly, nothing massive has come out so far.”