Tag: Drainpipes

  • Drainpipes in 2015 budget

    Drainpipes in 2015 budget

    The proposed 2015 budget has been largely pilloried by discerning Nigerians, many of who have argued that the current fiscal plan not only undermines the clamour for frugal spending by the federal government, but also contains some outlandish items, reports Ibrahim Apekhade Yusuf

    THE 2015 budget is in clear dissonance with the current economic realities assailing the country. That much, many economic and financial pundits have said.

    Reason: despite the orchestrated austerity and other belt-tightening measures announced by the federal government, what the budget proposal show is clearly at variance with the so-called measures announced by the federal government, thus fuelling fears that there is no sincerity of purpose on the part of government after all.

    Crux of the matter

    In the 2015 budgetary proposals, President Goodluck Jonathan and Vice President Namadi Sambo are expected to spend over N4billion on food and travels during the financial year.

    The presidency is allocated a total of N26.6 billion broken down as follows: N12.9 for personnel, N11.1 billion for overhead and N2.5 billion capital development fund respectively in 2015.

    Specifically, President Jonathan will spend N1.9 billion on travels and transport, while others under the president’s office will spend N1.3 billion on local travels and transport, and another N621.067 million on international travels and transport.

    Besides, Sambo will spend N42.4 million on travels and transport, while officials in his office will spend N19.6 million for local travels and transport and N10.7 million for international travel and transport. Local travel and transport will also get another N12 million.

    President Jonathan will also spend N517 million on miscellaneous, N456 million on honoraria and ‘sitting allowance’ and N60.8 million on publicity and advertisements.

    The vice president will spend N117million on miscellaneous items, N15 million on honoraria and sitting allowance, as well as N35 million on publicity and advertisements.

    The president and vice president will together spend N1.2 billion on foodstuff and kitchen items. And another N310 million will go for purchase of drugs and medical laboratory equipment. Separate from the transport expenses is an allocation to the presidential air fleet of N5.3 billion, with N36.1 million as salaries while the remaining sum to be spent on overheads and capital expenditure.

    Irreconcilables in the 2015 budget

    In the current fiscal plan, capital vote was projected to be N1.552 trillion. However, on paper, N610 billon has been released; whereas, actual funds made available to the MDAS for which implementation has been effected is only a little above N400 billion owing to “crude oil production quantity shocks, price shocks and under-remittances of internally generated revenue by some MDAs.”

    Justification for huge recurrent expenditure

    The increase in the recurrent votes, is informed by the huge wage bill of the federal government as personnel cost alone is to gulp more than N1.836 trillion, up from N1.727 trillion in the 2014 approved budget.

    Under the plan, Defence and Security; infrastructure and health sectors received generous attention, with the allocation beingN985.79 billion, N93.66 billion and N592.03 billion respectively.

    This decision, The Nation learnt, was taken because of the sectors’ impact on the generality of the citizenry and their potentials to facilitate growth and generate employment in line with the Transformation Agenda’s vision of diversifying the economy to insulate it from over dependence on oil mineral resources.

    The priority vote represents about 30 per cent of the entire 2015 aggregate expenditure.

    Surcharges in 2015 budget

    According to the Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, a 10 percent import surcharge would be imposed on new private jets, which is estimated to yield about N3.7 billion in 2015; 39 percent import surcharge on luxury yachts, which is estimated to potentially raise N1.6 billion in 2015; and 5 percent import surcharge on luxury cars, which is estimated to yield about N2.6 billion of additional revenues.

    Besides, there is a surcharge on business and first class tickets on airlines.

    Others are: the imposition of three percent luxury surcharge on champagnes, wines and spirits to generate about N2.3 billion in 2015; and a one percent FCT Mansion Tax on residential properties with value of N300 million and above, which should yield additional N360 million. These surcharges would yield a total of about N10.56 billion in 2015.”

    Based on these parameters, the 2015 budget envisages net federally collectible revenue of N6.9 trillion. Of this, a total of N3.6 trillion is envisaged to fund the FGN 2015 Budget, representing about 3.4 percent drop from N3.7 trillion for 2014 budget. This is with more emphasis on non-oil revenue sources to partly compensate for the shortfall in actual oil revenue.

    Growing apprehension over bogus budget

    It is understandable why the propriety or otherwise of the 2015 budget has become a hotly debated issue among discerning Nigerians.

    Speaking with a cross-section of Nigerians, including experts in diverse socio-economic sectors, they minced no words in their verdicts when they told The Nation that the ruling class has lost touch with the present realities of life.

    To many, these outlandish allocations do not take into account, or completely ignore the belt-tightening measures that the federal government said it expects Nigerians to make this year as part of a cost-cutting initiative.

    “It is one of the most insensitive budgets I have seen in recent times,” declared Mamood Isibor, a former financial analyst with PwC.

    What is particularly worrisome, Isibor said, is that the federal government did not hint at any possible adjustment to the provisions to his office when he addressed the nation in his New Year message.

    “Don’t be deceived, many Nigerians are slipping into poverty. But sadly, our president prides himself with the fact that his administration is ‘creating’ more billionaires in Nigeria.”

    Echoing similar sentiments, Mr. Tonye Ignatius has argued that the country has more blighted population judging by the rising number of internally displaced persons due to the activities of insurgents.

    “Many Nigerians are in dire need of a lifeline. I just find it hard to believe that the presidency awkward wage bill is clearly insensitive to say the least.”

    While noting that the president by virtue of his high office holds court with people from all over the globe, as such, needs to entertain them, Ignatius, however, said: “The presidency should as a matter of necessity should be frugal in tune with the times.”

    Also commenting on the incongruity in the 2015 budget, Dr. Austin Nweze, a political economist at the Pan Atlantic University, in an interview with The Nation raised some posers: “The pertinent question regarding the austerity measure the government plans to adopt is whether they do not affect the presidency? Is the budget not to the detriment of the masses considering the fact that it would further squeeze out life out of the average Nigerians? Why is the presidency not ready to make the needed sacrifices if it truly wants to send the message that we are experiencing austere times?”

    Nweze, who is the gubernatorial flag bearer of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in Ebonyi State, while faulting the budgeting process in the country, attempted a prognosis of the crisis inherent in the fiscal policy development.

    In the 2015 spending plan, the federal government, Nweze said, has undertaken a drastic cut on capital expenditure as the vote has slumped to N633.53 billion from the N1.552 trillion in the 2014 approved budget. The recurrent vote proposal, however, is raised to N2.616 trillion from the N2.468 trillion in the approved 2014 plan.

    “This is clearly laughable. If you say you’re addressing austerity measures, you’re supposed to cut down on recurrent expenditure and not capital expenditure. But in Nigeria’s case, it is the reverse. If last year, refreshment for presidency was over N300million and you now increase that to over N500million in 2015, what sort of austerity measures are you adopting? There is no austerity measures anywhere, except, of course, elsewhere among the masses. Austerity is for the masses and not for the rest of them…”

    According to him, at the centre of the problem concerning budgeting is the issue of corruption.

    “The government is just playing lip-service to the whole idea of austerity and belt-tightening measures. As part of the austerity measures, the federal government did asked the MDAs to close down their individual accounts in the banks…But I can tell you the civil servants know how to move around these things. With a few exception, almost everybody has a price he can be bought.”

    The nation’s budgeting process is one that aids corruption one way or the other.

    “Corruption is to blame largely for the problems with our budgets. A situation where we have to undertake fiscal planning on a yearly basis where most MDAs end up sharing unspent monies among themselves and line pockets of their conniving ministers and public officers this is corruption at the highest level.”

    “If you say you’re cutting N5m from the allowances of House of Reps’ members, it won’t solve the problem. The only solution is to cut down the cost of governance. Our government is over bloated.”

    Mr. Odilim Enwegabra, a development economist, is also on the same page with Nweze.

    According to him, the federal government lacks the political will to fight corruption.

    Eweagbara who picked holes in some of the economic postulations as contained in the 2015 fiscal plan, said: “IGR to Budget in Nigeria is barely 12 percent, whereas in most countries it’s more than 90 percent. The little IGR generated or declared in Nigeria is diverted “legally” to the extent that in 2009, for example, N3.06tn was declared generated but only N46.8bn was remitted to government; in 2010, N3.07tn was generated, but N54.2bn remitted; in 2011 N3.17tn, only N73.8bn was remitted. Thanks to section 22(1), which legalised this diversion.

    “Government will lose (in 2015 alone) as high as N3.6tn from its numerous revenue generating agencies had it not been that section 22 (1) of FRA allows these agencies only to remit 20 percent of their operating surplus, which allows these agencies to fraudulently push their operating costs so high to the extent that their operating surpluses ended up becoming close to zero. With close to zero operating surplus, 20 percent to be remitted to the consolidated federal revenue account, becomes insignificant. That means that, every year, revenue-generating agencies like NNPC, NCC, SEC, CBN, Nigeria Customs, FIRS, etc, remit close to nothing from their internally generated revenues.

    “Reducing fiscal deficit from N993.68bn in 2014 to N755bn in 2015, makes no sense when a pro-growth, pro-investment and pro-jobs government should increasing deficit spent even beyond the 3 percent GDP as the ceiling required by section 12(1) of the 2007 Fiscal Responsibility Act.

    “Most growth-focused and dynamic economies have fiscal deficits as high as 15 percent of their GDP as long as the money is for infrastructure and fiscal stimulus. That is why it doesn’t make any fiscal policy sense that at a time of revenue shortages government should be reducing fiscal deficit spending rather than increasing it to meet the impending shortage.

    “Had government used higher exchange rate than the present N165 to a dollar, both federal and state governments would have earned more naira from 2015 oil revenue than the current budget makes available to them,” Enweagbara argued.

    Okonjo-Iweala’s self assurance

    The Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, said that the 2015 plan was anchored on the need to save cost and reduce waste and leakages, warning that, henceforth, internally generated revenue (IGR) by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) will be thoroughly monitored to ensure that remittance is properly done.

    Any official caught pilfering with government’s independent revenue, according to her, will be seriously dealt with.

    Besides, she said surcharge for luxury items have been introduced, as part of measures to instill prudence in the management of public resources

    On IGRs, she said:  “Over the last three years, government has been working to increase its independently generated revenues (IGR) and has, in fact, sustained an upward trajectory in IGR receipts. Actual receipts have continued to grow from about N182 billion in 2011 to N274 billion in 2013 and then, N328 billion as of October 2014.

    “While this is encouraging, there are still leakages and incidences of non-remittance of requisite funds to Treasury by some agencies. Mr. President recently summoned a meeting with revenue generating agencies to address this issue, and subsequently issued an unequivocal directive to all revenue agencies to ensure remittance of their obligations to Treasury. With this strong support, we are working with the banks to ensure strict compliance, and so we have projected IGR receipts of N450 billion for 2015.” Way forward

    In the view of Nweze, one better way to ensure the system works is by addressing the leakages.

    “I recall at a committee put up by the Nigeria Institute of Management at the National Conference, in which myself and Henry Boyo were asked to write a policy brief for a model governance structure. What we proposed at the time was a collegiate system. With a collegiate system, you practically cut down on the huge cost of governance as we have presently.

    “We proposed a system whereby we would have just 36 senators one each from state. You don’t need more than six people to make laws in the state. That way you crash the cost to a very minimum level so that these monies can be used to invest in other relevant things. The problem is the system…The system has made it so. Correct the system and everything will be in order.”

    Nigeria’s democracy, Nweze stressed, “Didn’t take cognisance of our heritage and that’s why we have the issues we have now. If we don’t address the system, no matter what you do, we will continue to have problems. We can experiment with it even this year. The high cost of governance is really killing this country slowly. We just have to apply the brake, and urgently too.”

  • Drainpipes in 2015 budget

    Drainpipes in 2015 budget

    The proposed 2015 budget has been largely pilloried by discerning Nigerians, many of who have argued that the current fiscal plan not only undermines the clamour for frugal spending by the federal government, but also contains some outlandish items, reports Ibrahim Apekhade Yusuf

    THE 2015 budget is in clear dissonance with the current economic realities assailing the country. That much, many economic and financial pundits have said.

    Reason: despite the orchestrated austerity and other belt-tightening measures announced by the federal government, what the budget proposal show is clearly at variance with the so-called measures announced by the federal government, thus fuelling fears that there is no sincerity of purpose on the part of government after all.

    Crux of the matter

    In the 2015 budgetary proposals, President Goodluck Jonathan and Vice President Namadi Sambo are expected to spend over N4billion on food and travels during the financial year.

    The presidency is allocated a total of N26.6 billion broken down as follows: N12.9 for personnel, N11.1 billion for overhead and N2.5 billion capital development fund respectively in 2015.

    Specifically, President Jonathan will spend N1.9 billion on travels and transport, while others under the president’s office will spend N1.3 billion on local travels and transport, and another N621.067 million on international travels and transport.

    Besides, Sambo will spend N42.4 million on travels and transport, while officials in his office will spend N19.6 million for local travels and transport and N10.7 million for international travel and transport. Local travel and transport will also get another N12 million.

    President Jonathan will also spend N517 million on miscellaneous, N456 million on honoraria and ‘sitting allowance’ and N60.8 million on publicity and advertisements.

    The vice president will spend N117million on miscellaneous items, N15 million on honoraria and sitting allowance, as well as N35 million on publicity and advertisements.

    The president and vice president will together spend N1.2 billion on foodstuff and kitchen items. And another N310 million will go for purchase of drugs and medical laboratory equipment. Separate from the transport expenses is an allocation to the presidential air fleet of N5.3 billion, with N36.1 million as salaries while the remaining sum to be spent on overheads and capital expenditure.

    Irreconcilables in the 2015 budget

    In the current fiscal plan, capital vote was projected to be N1.552 trillion. However, on paper, N610 billon has been released; whereas, actual funds made available to the MDAS for which implementation has been effected is only a little above N400 billion owing to “crude oil production quantity shocks, price shocks and under-remittances of internally generated revenue by some MDAs.”

    Justification for huge recurrent expenditure

    The increase in the recurrent votes, is informed by the huge wage bill of the federal government as personnel cost alone is to gulp more than N1.836 trillion, up from N1.727 trillion in the 2014 approved budget.

    Under the plan, Defence and Security; infrastructure and health sectors received generous attention, with the allocation beingN985.79 billion, N93.66 billion and N592.03 billion respectively.

    This decision, The Nation learnt, was taken because of the sectors’ impact on the generality of the citizenry and their potentials to facilitate growth and generate employment in line with the Transformation Agenda’s vision of diversifying the economy to insulate it from over dependence on oil mineral resources.

    The priority vote represents about 30 per cent of the entire 2015 aggregate expenditure.

    Surcharges in 2015 budget

    According to the Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, a 10 percent import surcharge would be imposed on new private jets, which is estimated to yield about N3.7 billion in 2015; 39 percent import surcharge on luxury yachts, which is estimated to potentially raise N1.6 billion in 2015; and 5 percent import surcharge on luxury cars, which is estimated to yield about N2.6 billion of additional revenues.

    Besides, there is a surcharge on business and first class tickets on airlines.

    Others are: the imposition of three percent luxury surcharge on champagnes, wines and spirits to generate about N2.3 billion in 2015; and a one percent FCT Mansion Tax on residential properties with value of N300 million and above, which should yield additional N360 million. These surcharges would yield a total of about N10.56 billion in 2015.”

    Based on these parameters, the 2015 budget envisages net federally collectible revenue of N6.9 trillion. Of this, a total of N3.6 trillion is envisaged to fund the FGN 2015 Budget, representing about 3.4 percent drop from N3.7 trillion for 2014 budget. This is with more emphasis on non-oil revenue sources to partly compensate for the shortfall in actual oil revenue.

    Growing apprehension over bogus budget

    It is understandable why the propriety or otherwise of the 2015 budget has become a hotly debated issue among discerning Nigerians.

    Speaking with a cross-section of Nigerians, including experts in diverse socio-economic sectors, they minced no words in their verdicts when they told The Nation that the ruling class has lost touch with the present realities of life.

    To many, these outlandish allocations do not take into account, or completely ignore the belt-tightening measures that the federal government said it expects Nigerians to make this year as part of a cost-cutting initiative.

    “It is one of the most insensitive budgets I have seen in recent times,” declared Mamood Isibor, a former financial analyst with PwC.

    What is particularly worrisome, Isibor said, is that the federal government did not hint at any possible adjustment to the provisions to his office when he addressed the nation in his New Year message.

    “Don’t be deceived, many Nigerians are slipping into poverty. But sadly, our president prides himself with the fact that his administration is ‘creating’ more billionaires in Nigeria.”

    Echoing similar sentiments, Mr. Tonye Ignatius has argued that the country has more blighted population judging by the rising number of internally displaced persons due to the activities of insurgents.

    “Many Nigerians are in dire need of a lifeline. I just find it hard to believe that the presidency awkward wage bill is clearly insensitive to say the least.”

    While noting that the president by virtue of his high office holds court with people from all over the globe, as such, needs to entertain them, Ignatius, however, said: “The presidency should as a matter of necessity should be frugal in tune with the times.”

    Also commenting on the incongruity in the 2015 budget, Dr. Austin Nweze, a political economist at the Pan Atlantic University, in an interview with The Nation raised some posers: “The pertinent question regarding the austerity measure the government plans to adopt is whether they do not affect the presidency? Is the budget not to the detriment of the masses considering the fact that it would further squeeze out life out of the average Nigerians? Why is the presidency not ready to make the needed sacrifices if it truly wants to send the message that we are experiencing austere times?”

    Nweze, who is the gubernatorial flag bearer of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in Ebonyi State, while faulting the budgeting process in the country, attempted a prognosis of the crisis inherent in the fiscal policy development.

    In the 2015 spending plan, the federal government, Nweze said, has undertaken a drastic cut on capital expenditure as the vote has slumped to N633.53 billion from the N1.552 trillion in the 2014 approved budget. The recurrent vote proposal, however, is raised to N2.616 trillion from the N2.468 trillion in the approved 2014 plan.

    “This is clearly laughable. If you say you’re addressing austerity measures, you’re supposed to cut down on recurrent expenditure and not capital expenditure. But in Nigeria’s case, it is the reverse. If last year, refreshment for presidency was over N300million and you now increase that to over N500million in 2015, what sort of austerity measures are you adopting? There is no austerity measures anywhere, except, of course, elsewhere among the masses. Austerity is for the masses and not for the rest of them…”

    According to him, at the centre of the problem concerning budgeting is the issue of corruption.

    “The government is just playing lip-service to the whole idea of austerity and belt-tightening measures. As part of the austerity measures, the federal government did asked the MDAs to close down their individual accounts in the banks…But I can tell you the civil servants know how to move around these things. With a few exception, almost everybody has a price he can be bought.”

    The nation’s budgeting process is one that aids corruption one way or the other.

    “Corruption is to blame largely for the problems with our budgets. A situation where we have to undertake fiscal planning on a yearly basis where most MDAs end up sharing unspent monies among themselves and line pockets of their conniving ministers and public officers this is corruption at the highest level.”

    “If you say you’re cutting N5m from the allowances of House of Reps’ members, it won’t solve the problem. The only solution is to cut down the cost of governance. Our government is over bloated.”

    Mr. Odilim Enwegabra, a development economist, is also on the same page with Nweze.

    According to him, the federal government lacks the political will to fight corruption.

    Eweagbara who picked holes in some of the economic postulations as contained in the 2015 fiscal plan, said: “IGR to Budget in Nigeria is barely 12 percent, whereas in most countries it’s more than 90 percent. The little IGR generated or declared in Nigeria is diverted “legally” to the extent that in 2009, for example, N3.06tn was declared generated but only N46.8bn was remitted to government; in 2010, N3.07tn was generated, but N54.2bn remitted; in 2011 N3.17tn, only N73.8bn was remitted. Thanks to section 22(1), which legalised this diversion.

    “Government will lose (in 2015 alone) as high as N3.6tn from its numerous revenue generating agencies had it not been that section 22 (1) of FRA allows these agencies only to remit 20 percent of their operating surplus, which allows these agencies to fraudulently push their operating costs so high to the extent that their operating surpluses ended up becoming close to zero. With close to zero operating surplus, 20 percent to be remitted to the consolidated federal revenue account, becomes insignificant. That means that, every year, revenue-generating agencies like NNPC, NCC, SEC, CBN, Nigeria Customs, FIRS, etc, remit close to nothing from their internally generated revenues.

    “Reducing fiscal deficit from N993.68bn in 2014 to N755bn in 2015, makes no sense when a pro-growth, pro-investment and pro-jobs government should increasing deficit spent even beyond the 3 percent GDP as the ceiling required by section 12(1) of the 2007 Fiscal Responsibility Act.

    “Most growth-focused and dynamic economies have fiscal deficits as high as 15 percent of their GDP as long as the money is for infrastructure and fiscal stimulus. That is why it doesn’t make any fiscal policy sense that at a time of revenue shortages government should be reducing fiscal deficit spending rather than increasing it to meet the impending shortage.

    “Had government used higher exchange rate than the present N165 to a dollar, both federal and state governments would have earned more naira from 2015 oil revenue than the current budget makes available to them,” Enweagbara argued.

    Okonjo-Iweala’s self assurance

    The Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, said that the 2015 plan was anchored on the need to save cost and reduce waste and leakages, warning that, henceforth, internally generated revenue (IGR) by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) will be thoroughly monitored to ensure that remittance is properly done.

    Any official caught pilfering with government’s independent revenue, according to her, will be seriously dealt with.

    Besides, she said surcharge for luxury items have been introduced, as part of measures to instill prudence in the management of public resources

    On IGRs, she said:  “Over the last three years, government has been working to increase its independently generated revenues (IGR) and has, in fact, sustained an upward trajectory in IGR receipts. Actual receipts have continued to grow from about N182 billion in 2011 to N274 billion in 2013 and then, N328 billion as of October 2014.

    “While this is encouraging, there are still leakages and incidences of non-remittance of requisite funds to Treasury by some agencies. Mr. President recently summoned a meeting with revenue generating agencies to address this issue, and subsequently issued an unequivocal directive to all revenue agencies to ensure remittance of their obligations to Treasury. With this strong support, we are working with the banks to ensure strict compliance, and so we have projected IGR receipts of N450 billion for 2015.” Way forward

    In the view of Nweze, one better way to ensure the system works is by addressing the leakages.

    “I recall at a committee put up by the Nigeria Institute of Management at the National Conference, in which myself and Henry Boyo were asked to write a policy brief for a model governance structure. What we proposed at the time was a collegiate system. With a collegiate system, you practically cut down on the huge cost of governance as we have presently.

    “We proposed a system whereby we would have just 36 senators one each from state. You don’t need more than six people to make laws in the state. That way you crash the cost to a very minimum level so that these monies can be used to invest in other relevant things. The problem is the system…The system has made it so. Correct the system and everything will be in order.”

    Nigeria’s democracy, Nweze stressed, “Didn’t take cognisance of our heritage and that’s why we have the issues we have now. If we don’t address the system, no matter what you do, we will continue to have problems. We can experiment with it even this year. The high cost of governance is really killing this country slowly. We just have to apply the brake, and urgently too.”

  • ‘Bayelsa local govts were drainpipes’

    ‘Bayelsa local govts were drainpipes’

    There are controversies surrounding the local government reforms in Bayelsa State. The Chairman, Local Government Service Commission, Mr. Talford Ongolo, spoke to MIKE ODIEGWU.

    Genesis of the local government reforms

    When we came in, we had over 15,000 staff in the rural development areas and the eight local government areas popularly called the G8. Earlier before our inauguration, the governor because of his deep understanding of the problems besetting the various sectors had set up staff verification panels in all the eight local government areas. They studied the situation and the challenges and came up with various reports. The reports and revelations were mind-boggling.

     

    Removal of corrupt principal officers

    Some of these problems have been aptly captured. It was a springboard. It was revealed that the principal officers were part of the problem. So, when those that are supposed to implement your policies are part of the problems, you have to rethink, restrategise properly otherwise, you won’t succeed. So, government decided at that early stage that part of the reforms would begin with the principal officers. The principal officers were asked to go and beef up the capacity of the local government service commission. All of them without exception were redeployed.

    After they had been redeployed and asked to go on 30-day leave, because they were not even going on leave, a simple verification exercise was carried out in Yenagoa council alone and over N23million was recovered that first month. I went personally to receive the report. That report justifies the redeployment of principal officers.

     

    Non prosecution of removed officers

    This government is more inclined to looking forward. They are not out to punish people. The new principal officers were appointed in acting capacities because they have not attained that level of seniority to become substantive. As a former attorney-general, l have to insist we follow the law. The new principal officers were specially trained in ASCON for two weeks with myself and the permanent secretary present throughout the training programme. They wrote exams. They came back and took over in acting capacities. We want people with capacity to run the local government. Since, then we have been implementing other legs of the reform. We have sent them again for refresher courses.

     

    Biometrics

    We came up with the idea of biometrics. it was christened electro- diametric attendant register with automated payroll system. The simple explanation is that on the first day what the consultant first did was to carry out an enrollment exercise. Every staff in the local government system has to go there. They would take your enrollment details and the biometrics. After that, they started the clocking-in and clocking-out. So, everyday, you will go in the morning to clock-in and after the close of work, you will go back to clock-out.

    After the enrollment alone, people started protesting and even blocked the expressway. Government directed that those who didn’t enroll despite a long period of enlightenment campaign and publicity that their money should be paid into an unpaid salary account. So much was realised. We then went to the nitty-gritty of the matter. The records have justified government efforts. What we are implementing is that if you did not go to work any day, there is no way we can serve you query. People don’t go on a fishing expedition to serve queries. You are queried as you go to work. So, what we are doing now is that if you don’t go to work at all since we don’t know about your existence, we just pay that money into an unpaid salaries account. So, nobody will spend the money. These are the challenges we are having now.

     

    Promotion of workers

    In whatever we are doing, we like to carry Nigerian Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE) along. But it has not been easy. What we did was to organise a stakeholders’ conference where all of us including NULGE agreed on the biometrics. A communique was issued at the end of the conference and the NULGE President also signed it. Whatever we are doing now that NULGE is kicking against is in tandem with the resolutions of that conference.

    We also held another meeting in line with the conference resolution. We held a meeting of all the stakeholders. It was an extended stakeholders’ meeting. The meeting was concerning promotion because since 2008, there hasn’t been any promotion in the service. They told me that the reason was because the system was over-bloated with heavy staff strength and there was nowhere the councils can meet up with financial implications of promotions.

     

    Challenges of reforms

    But no human system can be perfect. There will be challenges here and there. As the challenges come up, we tackle them. People were just siphoning and packing money. One person would have 30 names in the payroll. If you are in an outstation since we are only dealing with workers at the local government headquarters, you are not affected so you are not to clock-in and clock-out for now. We have made it clear that we cannot ascribe to ourselves perfection. Any genuine case; if you know you are in an outstation and for any reason, your name did not appear, go and meet your principal officer and that is the routine. When people come, we clear them. People don’t want change. They just raise these small imperfections to a level to discredit the system. The consultants don’t prepare payrolls. The consultants, after taking records of the attendants, they generate a report. When they prepare these documents, they hand them over to the treasurers. The vouchers are now prepared by the treasury staff.

     

     

  • Drainpipes in federal revenue agencies

    Drainpipes in federal revenue agencies

    For three consecutive years, the Federal Government has failed to meet its revenue projections, a trend that may continue in the current fiscal year. This is believed to be the consequence of the leakages in the revenue collection and remittance of about 60 revenue generating agencies, writes Assistant Editor MUYIWA LUCAS

    Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala sits atop the second biggest but yet highly volatile economy on the African continent. There is huge Transformation Agenda plans, which require that she monitors with an eagle eye, developments both locally and internationally, to enable her pilot the economy aright. And when the need arises, the minister, a former Managing Director of the World Bank, has shouted to the roof tops about the phenomenal vistas her economic team is bringing in to reposition the economy. Similarly, she has not failed to indicate her fears for the economy as the situation demands. Last year, Mrs Okonjo-Iweala expressed fears that the revenue projection may not be achieved following competition from emerging oil-producing countries in Africa, listing other factors that may pose a threat to the country’s revenue to include oil theft, and pipeline vandalism.

    The Director-General of Budget Office, Dr. Bright Okogu, equally shared this fear, affirming that the threat to oil earnings in 2013 was enormous. He warned that the oil supply-demand gap for crude oil in Nigeria has unpalatable implications on sales. To avert such negative implications, Okogu pressed for an increase in the Internally Generated Revenue in the 2013 budget. Therefore, revenue generating agencies, such as the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) and the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), were to ensure proper remittance of all revenues collected on behalf of the government to the last kobo. His position is understandable. The 2014 budget envisaged a Gross Federally Collectible Revenue of N10.88 trillion from which N3.73 trillion of the expected collectible revenue will be used to fund the budget. Total expenditure for the year is N4.64 trillion. This figure is underpinned by the parameter of oil benchmark of 2.39 million barrels per day at a price benchmark of $77.5 per barrel, using an exchange rate of N160 to a dollar. It projects a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 6.75 per cent.

    Mrs Okonjo-Iweala’s and Okogu’s fears on the threat to oil are, however, not the only factor that may affect the 2014 revenue. Going by the antecedents of the government’s revenue generating agencies, beneath financing the 2014 budget lies deafening worries. This is because, from 2011 to 2013, the government has failed to meet its revenue projections, a trend that has cast doubt on government’s ability to meet the N4.64 trillion budget proposal for this fiscal year. This is blamed on the revenue generating agencies of government, said not to have been meeting their target for revenue collection, and in some instances, touted not to be forthright with regards to the full disclosure of their earnings. Recent events have shown that some revenue-generating agencies have turned out to be drainpipes on the much needed revenue. There are about 36 of these agencies, prominent amongst which are the NCS, FIRS, Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), Bureau of public Enterprise (BPE), NNPC and Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), amongst others. Initially, agencies such as the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), were not established to generate revenue into the government coffers, but their activities, such as issuance of vehicle number plates, have changed the setting; hence, they are now mandated by law to remit 20 per cent of their operating profit to the government.

    The revenue earned by these agencies shows that much more is desired. Last year, of its N1.3 trillion revenue target, the NCS could only collect N833.4 billion, representing 59. 52 per cent of its target for the year, or a revenue shortfall of N480.7 billion between January and November 2013. In 2012, the Service recorded N850.9 billion as revenue, falling short of the N872 billion set target by the government; in 2011, the NCS ended the year on a N741. 836 billion revenue earning, surpassing the set target of N596 billion, after falling short of its 2010 set revenue target of N561 billion when it struggled to rake in N546.64 billion

    Going by its strategic position as the major contributor to the nation’s revenue, and the wheel on which the economy revolves, the expectations from the NNPC, is understandably high. This is because a distortion in the earnings from the Corporation will naturally translate to a distortion in the economic survival of the country; presupposing that when the NNPC sneezes, the economy catches cold. Annually, the country’s budget proposal is tied to the performance of the oil sector and NNPC’s ability, alongside some other agencies like NCS and FIRS, to rake in huge revenue. In the 2014 budget, government projects that gross federally collectible oil and gas revenue to hit N7.16 trillion. But setting such targets has become a hollow ritual. For instance, in the 2012 budget, based on a $75 oil price benchmark, the government projected gross federally collectible revenue to hit N9.406trillion. Of this figure, proceeds from oil and gas, were expected to hit about N6.4 trillion. In 2013, the NNPC had a revenue shortfall of N1.93 trillion.

    While the NNPC and the NCS has had fluctuations in their revenue collections over the years, the FIRS has on the other hand has been able to sustain its revenue, surpassing its targets yearly, thus, faring better than other government revenue collection agencies. Consistently, the agency’s revenue has been on a steady increase over the years. In 2008, the agency earned N2.97 trillion; 2009 it was N2.197 trillion; 2010, N2.83 trillion surpassing government’s set target of N2.5 trillion; in 2011, in spite of the N2.7 trillion target set for the agency, going by the record from the Federal Ministry of Finance, the FIRS generated N4.62 trillion revenue exceeding that year’s budget by about N140 billion. In 2012, N5.007 trillion was generated by FIRS, surpassing its N3.6 trillion federal government set target for the year. As at November 2013, the FIRS had a surplus of N3.48 billion collected. Under the 2014 budget, N2.2 trillion was set as target for the highflying agency.

    But, the concerned agencies have not failed to shout themselves hoarse in trying to defend their inability to meet their set revenue targets. For instance, the NNPC easily blames the shortfall on increased crude oil theft, and a drop in crude oil production as a result of force majeure declared at the Brass and Bonny Terminals, and an increase in pipeline vandalism. Similarly, the NCS blames its below par performance on reduction in imports as a result of government policies, and also due to revenues forfeited from various concessions and waivers. Comptroller General of Customs, Dikko Inde Abdullahi, while admitting that the current fiscal year will be full of challenges for the Service, especially with the N1.2 trillion revenue target set for it this year, fingered the by the Federal Government’s new policy on rice, fish and the automotive industry as reasons for the substantial drop in volume of cargoes from where the NCS realizes a huge chunk of its revenue from duty and levies payable. He explained that with the imposition of a 10 per cent import duty on rice and increased rice levy from 50 per cent to 100 per cent in 2013, the Apapa Area One Command, which is the highest revenue collector for the Service, has progressively lost 70 percent of its annual revenue. Rice imports, most times, constitute up to 70 to 96 percent of its monthly revenue generation between 2011 and 2012. Figures of import waivers over a three- year period of 2011, 2012 and 2013 were put N55.9 billion, N55.3 billion and N59.4 billion respectively.

    The NNPC, which has come under public scrutiny, especially with the revelation by the suspended Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Sanusi Lamido Sanusi that the Corporation did not remit $10.8 billion to the federation account, has severally been criticised for lack of transparency in recent years. The NNPC was said to have lost $720 million in potential revenue to crude oil theft and production disruption during in January 2013, and incurred $1.22 billion in the repair and maintenance of its 5,000 kilometers of oil pipelines. But if the words of Okonjo-Iweala is anything to go by, then the days of accountability for the State oil Corporation may just be around the corner. “We need to see the justification, with receipts, where the money has been spent. Where this is not so, NNPC will need to account for the money. We need all the money due to the Federation Account and reconciliation with NNPC on the money is under way,” she insisted. Okogu has also expressed concern over the leakages in revenue from collecting agencies, disclosing that revenue generating agencies were in the habit of spending a large percentage of their earnings to match their revenue. For instance, he said that in 2009, a certain agency generated N85 billion but spent N83.2 billion, while in 2010, another agency which generated N1.7 billion increased its spending to N1 billion. To curb this, revenue-generating agencies must now remit at least 25 percent of their gross revenue, and tie their budget on the balance after remittance.

    But from Chief Anthony Ani’s disclosure, the leakage of revenue through these agencies predate the democratic dispensation. As a former minister of finance under the late General Sani Abacha’s administration, Ani obviously has his facts. He revealed that in 1997, of the federally collected revenue of N452 billion, only N208 billion was paid into the Federation Account, while in 1998, of the N424 billion collected, only N189 billion was remitted to government purse.

    Speaker, House of Representatives Aminu Tambuwal, while presiding over a meeting of revenue generation and remittances with revenue generating agencies and the House Committee on Finance in December 2012, decried frequent revenue leakages from government coffers, saying it was unlawful for any government agency to spend monies not appropriated by the National Assembly. Represented at the meeting by his deputy, Emeka Ihedioha, he revealed that 50 per cent of Federal Government revenue is illegally spent outside the annual budget. “A situation where actual government revenue and expenditure is unknown because revenue earning agencies of government spend the funds as they deem fit can no longer be tolerated. A situation where over 50 per cent of actual government revenue is spent outside the national annual budget has put Nigeria in a fiscal crisis,” he said.

    Buttressing the Speaker’s position, Chairman of the committee, Abdulmumin Jibrin, alleged that two of the revenue agencies-the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA0 and the National Airspace Management Agency (NAMA)- jointly generated N210 billion in 2012 and spent all the money without remitting a dime to the Federation Accounts.

    Similarly, members of the National Assembly Joint Committee on Interior were stunned when the former Comptroller-General of Immigration, Mrs. Rose Uzoma, disclosed that in 2011, the Nigeria Immigration Service generated N10.3 billion, but N3.4 billion was remitted to the federation account. These revelations were made when Mrs. Uzoma appeared before the committee to defend the 2012 fiscal budget. Her defence was that the revenue generated comprises of N8,192,717,842.77 and off-shore earnings of $13,378,206 (N2,140,512,320). Last year, the House of Representatives also revealed that 60 revenue generating agencies of the Federal Government generated but failed to remit over N9.4tn to the coffers of the government between 2009 and 2012. The House listed some of the agencies to include the Bank of Industry, Central Bank of Nigeria, Nigerian Port Authority and Power Holding Company of Nigeria. The House report of an investigation it conducted revealed that the agencies either spent the money on their operations or simply failed to remit it to the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federal Government. This figure is separate from the N6.132tn, which it said the NNPC and its subsidiaries generated internally from 2009 to 2011 and did not remit to government. It furthered made it known that the figure for the NNPC did not include crude oil sales expected to have been paid into the Federation Account.

    Jibrin, while giving a breakdown of the unremitted funds, said of the N3.06 trillion the agencies generated in 2009, only N46.8 billion, representing 1.53 per cent was remitted to the government; in 2010, the sum of N3.07 trillion was generated, but N54.1 billion or 1.76 per cent was remitted; and in 2011, the generated figure stood at N3.17 trillion, out of which N73.8 billion or 2.33 per cent was remitted; while as at October 2012, out of the N189 billion expected to have been remitted, only N80 billion was remitted, leaving a shortfall of N109 billion.

    “In all, the committee found out that the total remittance to government for the three years was a “paltry” N254.7 billion, out of the total revenue of N9.4 trillion generated. The agencies are simply bleeding this country dry. Not until we take drastic steps to stop them, huge funds that we would have used to execute capital projects will continue to go down the drain,” a bitter and shocked Jubrin exclaimed.

    The NNPC, still battling to wriggle out of the Sanusi expose of its $10.8 billion scandal, appears to have more mud rubbed on her. Last week, the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) stunned the country’s legislators, nay, Nigerians, when it revealed that $22.8 billion oil proceeds did not reflect in the Corporation’s books. This disclosure was made at the Muraina Ajibola led House of Representatives Joint Committees of Petroleum (Upstream), Petroleum (Downstream) and Justice, investigating the allegation by a Swiss-based Non-Governmental and Advocacy Organisation, Berne Declaration, that two Swiss oil trading companies-Vitol and Trafigura- in connivance with the NNPC, skimmed the country of about $6.8 billion in two years. Shamsuna Ahmed, NEITI Executive Secretary, explained that these transactions, which sum up to $22.8 billion, are off balance sheet items, that is, not disclosed in NNPC’s audited financial statements. “The implication is that there may be significant contingent liabilities to the Federation that are not being disclosed,” Ahmed warned. NEITI also said $1.73 meant for Joint Venture cash calls had been diverted by the NNPC.

    Experts warn that except urgent steps are taken the country may be heading for bankruptcy considering the extent of underhand dealings in these agencies. The Ministry of Finance has secured the services of McKinsey & Co. to help it plug tax leakages in the country, at least to shore up the country’s tax revenue to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio of seven per cent, which is considered low when compared with other middle-income African countries like South Africa and Angola, estimated at about 22 percent. Mrs Okonjo-Iweala also disclosed that over 75 per cent of small scale business operators have consistently been evading tax, in spite of the laudable efforts of the FIRS.

    “One of the areas of weakness has always been in our tax policy. The new move will see the non-oil sector contribute more to the economy through payment of appropriate taxes by relevant organisations. FIRS has really worked hard but we feel that there is still room to do better,” she said.

    But for the generality of Nigerians, the target set for these agencies are far too small compared to their earning capacity. This, it is said, accounts for why there is an under declaration of revenue. These targets are said to be peanuts when compared to the actual earning capacity of these agencies. For instance, a clearing agent at the Tin Can Island Port, TCIP, Lagos, is concerned, targets given to the NCS is far too small considering the volume of business carried out at the ports. Based on his own calculations, the TCIP alone is capable of generating the annual target of the NCS if there is no corruption in the system. “Clearing consignments of multinationals like NNPC, Nigerian Breweries, Guinness, etc, run into billions of naira yearly; and yet there are several other importers. So, I am convinced the NCS targets are peanuts and are realised conveniently,” he said.

    This view is expressly supported by Boniface Aniebonam, founder, National Association of Government Approved Freight Forwarders (NAGAFF), when he said that 95 per cent of imports and exports in Nigeria do not comply with regulations, leading to revenue loss to government. He warned that unless the NCS plugs the loopholes in the system, the achievement of the 2014 revenue target may be a charade.

    But, Olayiwola Shittu, National President of the Association of Nigerian Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA), added a different twist to blocking of the leakages when he suggested the payment of 0.5 per cent commission on all duties that importers help NCS to generate. He is convinced that if this is put in place, revenue leakages would be blocked as agents would insist on accurate duty payment to government in order to improve the commission accruable. This, he said, would make the federal government realize more than N3 trillion through the Customs annually. He blames some officials of the NCS for aiding some clearing agents to circumvent import rules in order to line their pockets, thereby depriving government of huge revenue.

    Large scale fraud in revenue calculation, collection and remittance has become a cankerworm that has eaten deeply into the fabrics of revenue generating and collecting agencies.

    This is better captured in the “Yearly report of the Auditor General for the Federation on the Accounts of the Federation of Nigeria for the year ended December 31, 2009.” The report, sent to the National Assembly, detailed the discrepancies in the figures of revenue remitted to the Federation Account by the NCS obtained from the CBN components. These were observed in the figures for nine months – January, February, April, May, June, July, August, September, and December, which indicated that the NCS remitted less than the revenue collected during the period to the government. While the figures for the three months – March, October and November indicated that the NCS remitted more than the revenues collected during the period to the Federation Account, which gave rise to a total net difference of N11.122 billion.

    In the report, Auditor-General of the Federation (AGF) Samuel Ukura unearthed the depth of under declaration and remittance of revenue in the oil sector. It revealed that oil companies in the country owed government huge sums of money in local and foreign currencies. For instance, it was revealed that the sum of N1.148 billion was owed government on penalty from gas flared and $795.309 million on royalties on crude oil were owed by various oil companies as at December 2009. Furthermore, the Ukura report further revealed during the audit examination of accounting and other records at the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) for the Federation Account, the computation of royalties payable by oil companies was based on actual crude oil lifted by them and not calculated on actual production figures; this contravenes the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding, MoU, with the oil companies involved. The MoU provide that payment of royalties should be based on production volume multiplied by the prescribed royalty rates. The AGF was of the view that the DPR had shirked its responsibility of raising the assessments on royalties and sending the demand notices to the oil firms for prompt settlement. “Rather, the oil companies are allowed to engage in the self-assessment of royalties payable by them. This action is obviously detrimental to the interest of the country,” Ukura noted.

    That is not all. In 2010, a House of Representatives Committee on Customs and Excise chaired by Yakubu Dogara, submitted a report which exposes the rot in the system. It also unravels the pressure on the NCS by top government officials to subvert due process. The report indicated that established rules on imports, exports, waivers, pre-releases, among others are breached with impunity, resulting in the loss of billions of naira by the Federal Government.

    For example, the House Committee said it uncovered that in 2006 to 2007, the nation lost N38 billion to illegal granting of Temporary Importations and Pre-Releases. But this amount is dwarfed by the N45.9billion which the NNPC was said to have failed to remit to the NCS as duty payable on imported petroleum products. The House Committee found out that the practice of “Mid-Stream Discharge of Cargoes”, later diverted to private jetties, is a major source of revenue loss. It said the practice was encouraged by importers with the connivance of Customs officials who deliberately hire the services of ships that Nigerian ports have no capacity to berth. The ships are said to stop mid-stream, where the cargoes are discharged to small vessels and taken to private jetties. By regulation, officials of the NCS should be available to assess such goods as they are being discharged for appropriate revenue collection. The committee report listed 27 firms which officials of the NCS reportedly connive with regularly to defraud the country.

    But what has happened to these reports remains unknown. Mayowa Sodipo, a public analyst, says it is appalling that most of these, especially the NNPC and NCS, have become a cartel that is untouchable. He blames politicisation and the desire to continuously oil the machineries of political office holders for the seeming helplessness to revamp the agencies.

    “Because of these interests that these agencies serve, the recommendations of several panels and enquiries into the books of the agencies by successive governments never see the light of day and, by implication, the agencies which are statutorily supposed to rake in huge revenues to government have become drain pipes because of corruption,” Sodipo said.

    Continuing, he said bigger sleaze occurs in lesser popular revenue generating agencies, which go almost unnoticed because they are obscure. Sodipo therefore canvassed for an effective anti- corruption fight to ensure that such loopholes are blocked.

    “Let us have anti corruption fight as it was in the days of Nuhu Ribadu,” he suggested.

    Abdullahi obviously knows the task ahead of him, especially as it affects the integrity of the Service.

    “I think from today, we will start the arithmetic of how we are going to achieve that figure. It is very easy. How? It is when we ensure integrity and recognise compliance that is how we are going to achieve it,” he said of the revenue projection.

    The CGC also assured that this year would be different because efforts would be intensified in prosecuting revenue offenders so as to serve as deterrent to others and meet the set target. The Customs board during its maiden meeting for 2014 presided over by Mrs Okonjo-Iweala approved new measures aimed at boosting the country’s revenue profile.

    This initiative gives Abdullah the confidence to say that “today, the modern Customs is about trade facilitation and want to prove to federal government that we have come of age and we have built the technological competence that can stand the test of time.”

    Certainly, the nation awaits the translation of Abdulahi’s talks and promises into improved revenue. For now, the agencies are baskets leaking away precious revenues.