Tag: ECA

  • ECA insists on regional autonomy

    The Eastern Consultative Assembly (ECA) rose yesterday from a crucial meeting in Enugu over the quit notice served on the Igbo living in the North,  calling for restructuring and regional autonomy.

    The meeting was attended by affiliate groups of the ECA coalition, youth groups, students associations, traditional rulers, traders organisations, women groups, town unions, NGOs and professional bodies.

    A communique signed by its deputy leader, Mrs. Maria Okwor, and the publicity secretary, Rev. Fr. John Odey, said: “The quite expected difficulty by certain sections of the country to recover from the shock of the successful May 30th sit-at-home ordered by Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and the paranoia exhibited by these oppressors and their agents, through a thoughtless quit order on Ndigbo in the North and pressure mounted by the national security community on our neighbours to issue press releases (usually for a fee) distancing themselves from our people, in a failed attempt to isolate us, is not lost on anybody.

    “These childish actions are confirmation that the total compliance of our people during the May 30th sit-at-home has sent jitters down the spine of the oppressors, who have just learnt that Nigeria’s artificial, unjust, unworkable and lopsided unitary structure, created solely by unelected soldiers of fortune, cannot survive much longer.

    “A new constitution anchored on regional autonomy is the only route open to save Nigeria. It does not matter that the oppressors, who have consistently shown the world, that, they are only good at mishandling self-determination agitations by always applying the wrong strategy, is at their usual folly again. What truly matters, is that the oppressed have resolved to get justice and nothing else. Forty-seven years of servitude, for losing a war, is enough punishment; nothing will make this generation accept second class citizenship anymore. The oppressor can continue to beat around the bush, for as much as they like. ‘They must come back to the truth: Nigeria must restructure….’

    “The ECA commends the Southeast governors, Ohaneze Ndigbo leadership, our friends and lovers of truth from the Middle Belt, the Southwest, the Niger Delta and beyond, for standing by our people as we are asked to quit the North.

    “The ECA assures the northern leaders who reprimanded and disowned the ‘quit notice givers’, that everybody knows, that the emotions that inspired the quit order is so deep seated, and stagnation as a result of the faulty, unitary structure, are so fundamental, that the platitude from right thinking Northern folks, who called for peace and calm without addressing the real truth, cannot and will not solve the problem.

    “The 47-year-old humiliating experience in Nigeria is unacceptable, we cannot take it anymore. Death, in the process of fighting for our honour and dignity is better than eternal slavery. We are tired of Nigeria as presently constituted.

    “We simply do not wish to transfer our second class status to our progeny. Period.”

  • ECA gets first woman Executive Secretary

    ECA gets first woman Executive Secretary

    United Nations (UN) Secretary General António Guterres has appointed Ms Vera Songwe as  the first female Executive Secretary of the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA).

    A statement on the commission’s website on Monday said Ms Songwe, a Cameroonian, is an economist and banking executive.

    It also said she was the first woman to ever be appointed to the position.

    Ms Songwe has been working as the International Finance Corporation’s (IFC’s) regional director for Africa covering West and Central Africa since 2015.

    She is also a non-resident Senior Fellow at The Brookings Institute: Global Development and    Africa Growth Initiative (since 2011).

    The commission said she would be bringing to the position a longstanding track record of    policy   advice   and   result   oriented   implementation   in   the   region,   coupled   with   a   strong strategic vision for the region.

    Ms Songwe  is a former Country Director for Senegal, Cape Verde, The Gambia, Guinea    Bissau and Mauritania at the World Bank.

    She is also a former Adviser to the Managing Director of the World Bank for Africa, Europe, Central Asia and South Asia Regions and Lead Country Sector Coordinator, it added.

  • ‘FAAC did not approve ECA withdrawal’

    ‘FAAC did not approve ECA withdrawal’

    The forum of Commissioners of Finance yesterday debunked the claim by the former Coordinating Minister of the Economy and Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala,  that the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) approved the withdrawal from Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of $2 billion.

    Reacting to Okonjo-Iweala’s claim, the commissioners’ forum in a press statement said: “This statement is far from the fact and is misleading”.

    The Forum stated unequivocally “that FAAC does not have the authority to approve withdrawals from the Excess Crude Account (ECA), therefore could not have approved the withdrawal from Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of $2 billion” adding “that the law setting up FAAC, which pre-dates the ECA, says it cannot approve withdrawal and has not done so in the past.”

    The forum said it had often querried the activities of ECA at its meetings, adding that it could therefore not have authorised and any withdrawal.

    Th commissioners said FAAC noted and observed the withdrawal  the controversial money in December, adding that the then Minister of State Finance and Chairman of FAAC was asked during the plenary of FAAC meetings what happened but said  former President Goodluck Jonathan gave approval for the withdrawals to pay oil marketers subsidy claims as they had threatened to stop importing petroleum products. He further explained that this action will be ratified by National Economic Council (NEC).

    “FAAC did not and could not have approved nor taken the decision to withdraw the sum of $2 billion from the ECA,” the forum said, adding that it “would want to excuse   Okonjo-Iweala on this misrepresentation because she was not in attendance during FAAC plenary and may not have been fully and adequately made abreast with every FAAC activity.”

  • Unauthorised ECA withdrawal: Okonjo-Iweala lied, says Commissioners Forum

    Members of the forum of Commissioners of Finance yesterday debunked former Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala’s claim that the Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) approved the withdrawal of $2 bilion from the Excess Crude (Foreign) Account.

    Reacting in a statement to Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala’s claim, the commissioners’ forum said: “This statement is far from the fact and it is misleading. The FAAC does not have the authority to approve withdrawals from the Excess Crude Account (ECA), therefore it could not have approved the withdrawal from Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of Two Billion U.S. Dollar ($2,000,000,000.00).”

    It added “that the law setting up the FAAC, which pre-dates the ECA, says it cannot approve withdrawal and has not done so in the past.

    “If anything, FAAC, as records of its meetings indicates, had often queried the activities on the ECA, and therefore did not decide any withdrawal”.

    The commissioners’ forum said that FAAC noted and observed the “withdrawal from the ECA of a total sum of Two Billion U.S. Dollar ($2,000,000,000.00) in December. The then Minister of State, Finance and Chairman of FAAC, when asked during the plenary of FAAC meetings of the respective months, explained that the former President gave approval for the withdrawals from the ECA to pay oil marketers subsidy claims as they had threatened to stop importing petroleum products. He further explained that this action will be ratified by National Economic Council (NEC).

    “FAAC did not, and could not have approved, nor taken the decision to withdraw the sum of Two Billion U.S. Dollar ($2,000,000,000.00) from the Excess Crude Account.”

    The statement said the forum “would want to excuse the ex-Minister, Dr Ngozi Okonjo Iweala, on this misrepresentation because she was not in attendance during FAAC plenary and may not have been fully and adequately made abreast with every FAAC activity”.

    The former minister has been locked in a war of words with some governors, who have been accusing her of being economical with the truth on the management of the ECA, especially alleged illegal withdrawals from the ECA late last year.

    The governors accused Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala of making an unauthorized withdrawal of $2 billion from the ECA in December 2014 but the former minister fired back by saying that the withdrawal was done with the knowledge of the governors, who were represented at FAAC meetings by their commissioners of finance.

     

     

  • Fed Govt, states, councils to share $1.7b from ECA

    The Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) will on Monday share $1.7 billion from the Excess Crude Account (ECA) among the federal, states and local governments.

    Accountant General of the Federation Ahmed Idris stated this after a meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari. With him was the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Mrs. Anastasia Daniel Nwaobia.

    Idris said the committee met in the account between $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion, contrary to the $2b balance announced by Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole last week after the National Economic Council (NEC) meeting.

    The AGF said: “Even today, we are going to meet. The FAAC is going to meet, and we are going to distribute as agreed and directed during the NEC meeting last week and the position is very clear, what we met on ground is what we are going to distribute.

    “It is hovering between $1.6 to $1.7 billion; that is what we are going to distribute among all the three tiers of governments, the federal, states and local governments, based on the approved formula.”

    On his plans in his new role as AGF, he said: “The general message is clear, Mr. President had a clear direction which we all have to fall in line with; prudent management of resources and identifying more alternative ways of generating revenue, which we are set to do and to manage the meager resources we found on ground very efficiently and effectively for the betterment of the economy.”

    Nwaobia said discussions on the controversy with governors overspending in the last administration did not come up during the meeting with the President.

    “That was not discussed with the president because it was an issue that was discussed thoroughly at the National Economic Council meeting.” she said

    She said the liabilities on fuel subsidy will be paid when the final figures are verified.

    “We did not say that we will not pay subsidy, like the former minister said, there is a liability on subsidy, which is being verified by the CBN and Budget Office of the Federation.

    “The issue had to do with the forex differentials which they were claiming and this committee is looking into it, and as soon as it is resolved we will be able to pay the verified amount when the committee finishes its work.”

    She denied reports of massive looting in the ministries as a result of the absence of ministers.

    “It is an unfair statement to make, if people have evidence that there is large scale looting going on they are free to come with such, and the freedom of information act allows that you ask questions. So if there are ministries they are suspecting of embarking on large scale looting, which I think is not true, but everybody is free to ask.”

    On the effect of the absence of political heads, she said: “I don’t think it is an issue to bother. You know like I said, government is a continuum, even if you have political heads there, the engine room of the service is the civil servants, and we have continued to do our work.

    “What I will say is that the briefing is to bring Mr. President up to speed one-on-one on what is happening in the agencies, though handing over notes were presented but I think discussing the handing over notes and clarifying certain issues in the handing over notes is very important and that is what we have done with Mr. President and at this briefing we have a bit of insights on how he wants us to run the ministry in the interim.”

    On the President’s view about the management of the resources, she said: “The President is concerned about prudent management of the resources of this country and we are taking that message away with us and we also intend to work assiduously to ensure that revenue leakages are blocked and also shore up our revenue.”

  • The NNPC, ECA probe

    The NNPC, ECA probe

    •The job is better done by professionals

    Rising from its inaugural meeting last week, the National Economic Council (NEC), mandated the governors of Gombe, Edo, Akwa Ibom and Kaduna states to probe the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC. Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole, who addressed the media on behalf of the NEC, gave the reasons why the probe had become necessary. He referred specifically to the submissions to the NEC by the NNPC and officials of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation that showed that the NNPC earned about N8.1 trillion between 2012 and May 2015, out of which N4.3 trillion was paid by the corporation into the Federation Account.

    Aside seeking answers to how the huge differential of N3.8 trillion withheld by NNPC was spent, he also disclosed that the quartet will seek to unravel the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of another $2.1 billion allegedly withdrawn unilaterally by the Goodluck Jonathan administration in the last six months of its tenure, without the authority of NEC.

    Merely by the depth of the fiscal crisis across most states of the federation, a good part of which can easily be blamed on the spendthrift accounting of oil revenue by the immediate past administration of President Jonathan, we can understand the urgency and earnestness of the NEC to deliver results – and more money to the treasury. Yet, as important as that element is, it is only a minor part of the more complex, exacting task of stripping the NNPC of its opaque practices that continue to deny the country value for money, as a first step in the process of its overdue restructuring.

    We start on the basic premise that the governors are perfectly in order – and that Nigerians are entitled to know how the funds, right down to its most minute details, were spent. We also accept as given that there can be no revenue without costs. What Nigerians would like to know is how a corporation that has never successfully drilled a water aquifer let alone an oil well, an entity globally renowned for playing the collecting agency could justifiably claim to spend nearly 47 percent of its entire collection on itself?

    As far as we know, financial activities of entities, whether public or private, are supposed to be captured in the relevant budget instruments. Why should the NNPC continue to be an exception? Does the current practice of collect and spend –almost without restrictions – have basis in law? How does one measure if indeed value was delivered? Could NNPC as the collecting agency for the Federation Account on its own determine what it spends for whatever reasons without reference to the states?

    These are questions for which Nigerians have long sought answers to no avail. But then, a panel of four governors to undertake the probe? This is where our misgivings derive from. As professionals in diverse fields in their own rights, we have no doubt that the governors would be able to prise through the complex maze designed by NNPC to escape scrutiny. The real issue is whether they would have the energy and time to undertake a thorough job in view of their busy schedules. Asking the governors to sift through the thousands of pages of documents in addition to taking testimonies from dozens of witnesses seems to us a needless and gratuitous addition to the job brief of their Excellencies at this point in time. We advise the NEC to turn over the assignment to professionals; the latter in our view would do a far more credible and thorough  job than the quartet would be able to deliver.

    ‘Asking the governors to sift through the thousands of pages of documents in addition to taking testimonies from dozens of witnesses seems to us a needless and gratuitous addition to the job brief of their Excellencies at this point in time. We advise NEC to turn over the assignment to professionals; the latter in our view would do a far more credible job than the quartet would be able to deliver’     

     

  • States got N2.92tr from ECA in four years, says Okonjo-Iweala

    States got N2.92tr from ECA in four years, says Okonjo-Iweala

    •Fed Govt got N3.29tr

    States shared N2.92 trillion from the Excess Crude Account (ECA) between 2011 and 2014, Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the EconomyDr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, stated last night.

    A statement from the ministry of finance said the Federal Government’s share in the corresponding period is N3.29trillion.

    The ministry released the statement in response to the question by the Nigeria Governor’s Forum (NGF) last week that the minister should give account of the ECA cash, claiming that — was unaccounted for.

    The statement from the ministry noted that the “figures show that they (states) received N966.6 billion in 2011, N816.3 billion in 2012, N859.4 billion in 2013 and N282.8 in 2014. The low figure for 2014 reflects the steep decline in revenues due to the impact of the crash in global oil prices which began in the middle of the year.”

    Akwa Ibom got the highest with (N265 billion), Rivers (N230.4 billion), Delta (N216.7 billion), Bayelsa (N176.3 billion), Kano (N106.5 billion) and Lagos (N82.9 billion) from the ECA.

    Kwara (N52.8 billion), Enugu (N51.6 billion), Gombe (N47.7 billion), Nassarawa (N46.9 billion), Ekiti (N46.8 billion) and Ebonyi (N44.3 billion) received the least amount.

    The statement said: “The summary of the inflows and outflows from the Account shows that the opening balance was $4.56 billion in 2011 and reached a peak the following year at $8.7 billion before declining to $2.3 billion in 2013. The balance as at May 2015 is $2.07 billion.”

    The fluctuation in the ECA the statement “reflects the sharing of the proceeds usually requested by state governors as well as the practice of Augmentation which involves additional sharing from the ECA when available funds are not adequate to meet revenue projections.”

    The finance ministry noted that Subsidy and SURE-P payments are also made from the ECA.

  • ECA tasks African Central Banks on development finance

    ECA tasks African Central Banks on development finance

    Economic Commission of Africa has impressed on Central Bank governors in Africa, the need to focus a lot more efforts on development finance.

    Giving this charge at the weekend was Mr. Carlos Lopes, the Executive Secretary of the Commission, while addressing a group of central bank governors at the Conference of Ministers 2015 in Addis Ababa.

    Lopes, who posed the question to a group of central bank governors and development financing experts during the Caucus of Governors session at the Joint Annual Meetings of the African Union Specialised Technical Committee on Finance, Monetary Affairs, Economic Planning and Integration and the ECA Conference of African Ministers of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, explained that “the pertinence of this question stems from the fact that US$ 1 trillion of capital has not been put to work to finance Africa’s transformation. US$ 1 trillion dormant in the coffers of pension funds, central banks, commercial banks and other holders of remittances in Africa.”

    Experts and policy makers agree Africa’s development must be financed from local sources. Therefore, Mr. Lopes posited, “controlling the finance is the key to fulfilling our aspirations.”

    Mr. Joseph Enyimu, member of the Intergovernmental Committee of Experts on Sustainable Development Financing, confirmed that savings are on the rise on the continent but the challenge was channeling those savings into meaningful investments. Mr. Lopes put the ball in the court of the governors by telling them, “It is primarily you who can put this money to work.”

    During the first meeting of the Caucus of Governors in Abuja in 2014, the participants acknowledged the narrow mandate of central banks but agreed on the need for the banks to promote economic transformation.

    The discussions soon showed that different countries have taken different approaches to development financing, with many participants citing the examples of Ghana and Nigeria in co-financing big infrastructure projects and Kenya and Uganda’s bond schemes as good practices.

    On the question of conservative versus activist central banks, Mr. Louis A. Kasekende, one of the co-chairs of the meeting and the current Deputy Governor of the Bank of Uganda, pointed out that some central banks have begun to undertake innovative schemes where they work together with commercial banks to improve the loans and bond conditions for business, especially for small and medium enterprises.

    The ECA stressed that central banks need to “include critical developmental roles with effective support to the fiscal authorities, within a macroeconomic policy framework that focuses on structural transformation and that controlling the finance is the key to fulfilling our aspirations.”

  • How Nigeria fixes decayed infrastructure, by Onolememen

    How Nigeria fixes decayed infrastructure, by Onolememen

    MINISTER of Works, Architect Mike Onolememen, has said that for Nigeria to come out of the woods, the executive and legislative arm must collaborate to declare emergency on the infrastructural sector.

    Onolememen also called for the establishment of an Infrastructure Development Fund (IDF) to be financed from 50 percent of the Excess Crude Account (ECA).

    He spoke while delivering the 2014 Professor Ambrose Alli Distinguished Leadership Lecture with the theme ‘Infrastructure, Good Governance and the Challenge of Nation Building.’

    Onolememen added that the country needs better corporate governance that require an amendment to the Company and Allied Matters Act, which allow companies to contribute five percent of their pre-tax income to the IDF.

    Positing that the country’s ailing infrastructure cannot be funded by provisions in the annual budget or through the nascent PPP, he added, “The situation calls for bold and courageous actions and collaborations by the three levels of government to unleash uncommon transformation in the nation.”

    He declared that the current reality calls for ingenious solutions to fix the country’s decayed infrastructure.

     

  • Governance by blackmail

    Governance by blackmail

    SIR: “We should be constructive in our criticisms so that we do not inadvertently encumber the rebuilding of our nation. The President of Nigeria must be transported safely at all times. The cost may seem exorbitant now, but it would be impossible to put a price tag on good governance and an efficiently run country”.

    This statement was made in 2010 by President Goodluck Jonathan in a bid to replenish the ever-increasing fleet of the Presidential aircraft. Three planes were subsequently added to the PAF that same year, and another two in 2011 and 2012, totalling 10!

    Now this. The 2014 budget before the National Assembly has a slush provision of N1.6 billion as deposit for the purchase of a new aircraft for the presidential fleet that already boasts a record 10 planes and is ranked among the most luxurious across the globe.

    President Jonathan has established that corruption is the air his government breaths. The sum of N2.58 trillion paid out in the oil subsidy mega-scam of 2011 is the greatest act of looting of the national treasury since independence. As part of the squander mania, the US$21 billion in the Excess Crude Account (ECA), which was the balance in the account when Jonathan became acting President in 2010, has since been drawn down to less that US$2 billion presently.

    In the last 14 years, PDP has proved to be a colossal disaster. Shortly before the party took over in 1999, the price of oil was eight dollars a barrel. The military built universities, seaports, the highways, airports, hospitals and all the visible edifices you can find anywhere in the country. In the last 14 years, with oil price between $100 and $170 a barrel, the PDP cannot maintain what they inherited. Instead, they sold the nation’s commonwealth to themselves and their cronies.

    President Jonathan’s Transformation Agenda is nothing more than empty sloganeering solely meant to transform personal friends of the administration. No pretences should be made about this.  Aso Rock mole hints that if it were possible for the President to open the vault of heaven to woo back the millions of defecting PDP members against his ineffectual government, the President would been readily open for it. This cast of governance is the sort that takes a nation to the abyss. We hope that the Presidency and its minders take note.

     

    • Erasmus Ikhide,

    Lagos.