Tag: Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)

  • Ladoja failed to return ‘stolen’ funds, EFCC alleges

    The Federal High Court in Lagos Wednesday heard that a former Oyo State Governor Rashidi Ladoja allegedly did not return his own share of funds he received from the sale of the state’s shares.

    Ladoja is on trial for allegedly converting N4.7billion from the state treasury to his personal use, which he denied.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) charged him along with Waheed Akanbi, who served as Commissioner for Finance under Ladoja’s administration.

    An EFCC investigator, Abubakar Madaki, testifying in Ladoja’s trial, alleged that the former governor unilaterally gave instructions in 2007 that the shares, worth N6.6billion, be sold at discounted rates without the state executive council’s resolution.

    The witness said the money allegedly went to Ladoja, his family and friends.

    According to the investigator, Ladoja engaged Fountain Securities as a portfolio manager to sell the shares at a discounted rate, adding that the shares were acquired by McLace Securities.

    “In the course of our investigation, about N500million was recovered from McLace Security, Fountain Securities and other stockbrokers,” he said.

    According to him, Ladoja had promised to return his own share of the money, but never did.

    “EFCC recovered over N500million and some vehicles. All the recoveries were remitted to the Oyo State Government, except the money and vehicle that Ladoja got, which he claimed he would return but never did,” Madaki said.

    Read Also:Ladoja, family, friends blew N1.9b shares proceeds, says EFCC

    The witness said all the recoveries “were the balance that was supposed to be paid to the state government but was shared”.

    Madaki said the Nigerian Stock Exchange had also launched an investigation into how Oyo’s shares were sold.

    The witness said EFCC also discovered that a residential apartment known as Quarter 361 was purchased by Ladoja’s former executive assistant Adewale Atanda on Ladoja’s behalf, with the proceeds of shares from Heritage Apartments, which was the state’s broker.

    In order to verify that the property was acquired with the shares’ proceed, Madaki said EFCC requested for the payment details, and discovered that a cheque was written by Heritage Apartments.

    The witness said Atanda also bought 14 cars for the state lawmakers as well as for Ladoja and his wife using a loan obtained from Wema Bank.

    “They used the shares proceeds to offset the loan they took from Wema Bank. The accused benefitted from the vehicle. The wife also benefitted,” he said.

    The witness said investigations were extended to the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), to unravel the identity of another company named Bistrum Investment Ltd, which was also used in the transfer of Oyo State funds.

    He said though the first accused denied personal knowledge of Bistrum, he admitted knowing one its directors who he said was his cousin.

    Madaki said further investigations confirmed that Atanda’s account in Lagoon Homes, which also received part of the shares proceeds from stock brokers, was issued a bank draft of N70 million.

    EFCC accused Ladoja and Akanbi of converting N1,932,940,032.48 belonging to Oyo to their personal use through the Guaranty Trust Bank account of a company, Heritage Apartments Limited despite knowing that it was proceed of crime.

    The prosecution said Ladoja removed £600,000 (about N240, 219,945) from the state coffers in 2007 and sent it to Bimpe Ladoja in London.

    Ladoja also allegedly bought an armoured Land Cruiser jeep with N42million for himself using public funds.

    EFCC said he converted N728, 600,000 and another N77, 850,000 at different times in 2007, and allegedly transferred N77, 850,000 to Bistrum Investments, which he nominated to help him purchase a property named Quarter 361 in Ibadan, Oyo State capital.

    The alleged offence contravenes sections 17(a) and18 (1) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004, punishable under sections 14(1), 16(a) (b) and 18(2).

    Ladoja and Akanbi pleaded not guilty.

    Trial continues Thursday.

     

  • Updated: Court sentences ex-Taraba governor to 28 years imprisonment

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Gudu, Abuja has sentenced former Taraba State Governor, Reverend Jolly Nyame to a cumulative jail term of 28 years, without an option of fine.

    In a judgment on Wednesday, Justice Adebukola Banjoko convicted the ex-governor on 27 out of the 41 counts contained in the charge filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in July 2007.

    The breakdown of the sentence is as follows: 14 years upon conviction for the offence of criminal breach of trust; seven years for receiving gratification; five years for obtaining valuable public properties without consideration, and two years for criminal misappropriation.

    The judge said the sentences would run concurrently, implying that the ex-governor may end up spending 14 years in prison.

    Justice Banjoko, who said the defendant betrayed his claim to be a clergyman and Reverend, wondered why it was only the ex-governor that was prosecuted in view of the level of impunity displayed, while Nyame was in office.

    The judge, in the over 300-page judgment, which she read for over six hours, said after carefully examining all the evidence tendered by the prosecution, she was left with no option than to conclude that it was “either Nyame entered into office without a corrupt mind, but later became corrupt or he was corrupt ab-initio.”

    The judge said: “There was such a crazy level of corruption in the air in Taraba State Ministry of Finance. It is however amazing that none of the officials were arraigned. ”

    She said the evidence before the court showed that while officials that served under the defendant were returning their loot to the EFCC after they were questioned, Nyame “was still busy committing more crime”.

    The judge noted that one of such crimes included the N100m the defendant withdrew from the state coffers ostensibly to host former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who paid a one-day visit to Taraba State in 2007.

    Justice Banjoko said there was a nexus between Nyame and the fictitious N250m contract that was awarded for the bulk purchase of stationery and office equipment.

    The judge noted that Nyame had through his then Commissioner of Finance, Alhaji Abubakar Tutare, approved a memo for that contract which was awarded to a firm, Saman Global Ventures, on January 1, 2005, sidelining key officials of the Ministry of Finance in the process.

    She said: “The defendant gave that memo life by giving his approval”, the court held, noting that N180m was subsequently diverted from the conctract sum and handed to the ex-governor.”

    The judge, though noted that the evidence against the ex-governor in respect of the transaction was “circumstantial,” because no other document had his signature except the memo, she said the manner funds were approved and released from the Taraba State treasury, showed that the defendant acted in breach of his oath of office.

    “It is disheartening to note that between 2004 to 2005, the Ministry of Finance in Taraba State was specially an enclave; it was a den of criminal activities, best illustrated with Ali Baba and the 40 thieves.

    “The court finds the defendant guilty as charged. The clear purpose of the money was diversion.  There was no evidence of purchase of the stationary”, Justice Banjoko held.

    Besides, the Judge held that Nyame repeatedly approved release of funds to the firm despite being aware that it neither purchased the stationery nor executed any contract.

    She said there was no evidence that Nyame, who had within five weeks, moved over N345m from the Taraba State coffers for purchase of stationery, made any attempt to prosecute the firm or to set up a panel of inquiry, when the fraud was brought to his attention.

    The judge said the defendant “dishonestly” diverted public funds through the Taraba State liaison office, on the guise that it was used for the purchase of rice that was shared to his supporters.

    “The progenitor of this impunity was no one else than the defendant himself. The defendant cannot feign ignorance of this colossal fraud.

    “He who approves must be accountable to what he approved. The defendant had the dominion over the state fund and only he could say open-sesame to the vault of Taraba State.

    “The defendant cannot escape responsibility or cling to the thin plank of mere approval, “the jude said.

    Justice Banjoko added that the defendant committed “criminal breach of trust beyond reasonable doubt,” by approving N111m to host guests when the Mambilla Power Project was commissioned.

    The judge, while finding Nyame guilty of receiving gratification to the tune of N80m, said she was amazed that the defendant, in an effort to defend the charge, “provided the entire arsenal for the prosecution.”

    She noted Nyame was also very inconsistent, particularly as it relates to issues surrounding the presidential visit and security votes.

    The judge rejected the prayer by the defence for an option of fine.

    Justice Banjoko said she rejected Nyame’s plea for leniency because of the overwhelming evidence and facts of the case.

    The judge added: “The citizens of Taraba had elected the defendant, a clergyman, in three separate occasions to govern them, which shows constant level of trust.

    “The expectation must have been so high. As a Reverend, he must have been seen as an epitome of morality, piety and everything good.

    “How will Reverend Nyame begin to explain to people of Taraba State his actions and inactions? How can he justify causing such a colossal loss to the state?”

    Justice Banjoko said Nyame comitted “catalogue of crimes” a month before he vacated office, “while under intense searchlight from security agencies.”

    She said the court would be failing in its responsibility “if it fails to impose the full sanction”.

    The judge, who noted that the defendant “behaved like a common thief with unbridled greed”, said the sentence passed on him would serve as a deterrent to other public office holders.

    The court directed EFCC to return all the funds it recovered in the process of its investigation into the case to the coffers of Taraba State.

    The judgment came about 11 years after Nyame, who served as Governor between May 29, 1999, to May 29, 2007, was first arraigned on the 41-count charge in which he was accused of looting the state’s funds to the tune of N1.64billion.

    Earlier before the court sat, indication that a major development was in the offing was evident in the number of armed security that took charge of security within and around the hitherto quiet court premises.

    After being subjected to a session of search at the court’s main entrance, visitors were again frisked before allowed entry into the courtroom.

    Dressed in a dark brown kaftan with a cap to match, Nyame entered the courtroom at about 9.02am.

    Read Also:N1.64bn fraud suit: Nyame to know fate on May 30

    Justice Banjoko came into the courtroom around 9.40am. She first attended a case before directing that the case involving Nyame be called. It was around 9.46am.

    When the case was called, Nyame, who sat on the second-to-the-last row on the right  side of the courtroom, walked to the dock located on the left hand side of the courtroom, a few distance from where the judge sat.

    The judge began reading the judgment at about 9.51am, with Nyame seated calmly in the dock.

    At a point when the judge announced the conviction of the defendant, Nyame, who had all along lowered his head, raised it and looked towards the judge.

    There also a sudden murmuring by the court’s audience, among who were the defendant’s associates, supporters and friends.

    After convicting the defendant, Justice Banjoko stood down the case for some time, but returned later to pronounce the sentence.

    Immediately the judge rose after pronouncing the sentence, Nyame, who was still sitting in the dock, was surrounded by armed security personnel.

    By 4pm, the security personnel and prison officials were seen still awaiting the completion of the necessary documents before he could be taken the ex-governor, who looked troubled, to prison.

    The EFCC had charged Nyame with 41 counts of criminal breach of trust, criminal misappropriation, taking gratification and obtaining valuable thing without consideration.

    The prosecution’s case against the ex-governor relates mainly to the allegation of his diversion of N1.64bn of Taraba State’s funds while he was governor.

    In the course of trial, the prosecution led by Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), called 14 witnesses and closed its case on November 22, 2016.

    Nyame called four witnesses in his defence, including himself.

    Meanwhile, the judge is expected to deliver judgment on June 12 this year, in the trial of former Plateau State Governor, Joshua Dariye (now a serving Senator).

    Dariye is facing a 21-count charge bordering on money laundering and diversion of Ecological Fund to the tune of N1.162 billion.

  • Alleged N2.1bn fraud: Prosecution closes case in Dokpesi’s trial

    …Defence plans no case submission

     

    The prosecution in the alleged N2.1billion fraud trial involving businessman, Raymond Dokpesi, and his firm, Daar Investment and Holdings Company Limited, announced the closure of its case Monday after calling 14 witnesses.

    Lead prosecution lawyer, Oluwaleke Atolagbe made the announcement after his 14th witness; Usman Aliyu concluded his testimony before a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    An operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Aliyu gave details of his “analysis” of the N2.1bn allegedly paid unlawfully to Dokpesi and Daar by the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) in 2015.

    Aliyu said his findings revealed that Dokpesi allegedly spent the money to acquire personal assets. He said there was no basis for the payment of the N2.1bn to the defendants.

    Aliyu said, “My investigation bordered on the N2.1bn received by Daar Investment and Holdings from the Office of the National Security Adviser, without any due process followed and without carrying out any contract for the Office of the National Security Adviser.”

    The witness was made to read from a document the various transactions relating to the transfers of various sums of money to beneficiary companies from the N2.1bn allegedly paid by ONSA into Daar’s accounts.

    According to Aliyu, “all the money paid to Archisynthensis Limited was for renovation and construction work at the home of Dr. Raymond Dokpesi at Agenebode in Edo State and Daar’s office in Asokoro, Abuja.”

    Under cross-examination by lead defence lawyer, Kanu Agabi (SAN), the witness accepted the defence’s suggestion that funds in ONSA’s account with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) were not proceeds of crime.

    He also said, “There is no reason for the defendants to have received any funds from the National Security Adviser.

    “The payment was made without any process being followed and without any contract executed.”

    Aliyu agreed with the defence that the defendants had “no control” over the procedure of payments by the NSA office.

    Read Also:Dokpesi to Lai Mohammed: Retract calling me looter or face N5b lawsuit

    At the conclusion of Aliyu’s evidence, after he was cross-examined by Agabi, Atolagbe told the court that the prosecution would close its case.

    Agabi said the defence intends to make a no-case submission, in which it would argue among others, that the prosecution has not led sufficient evidence linking it to the offences charged and warrant it being called to enter a defence.

    The defence will then pray the court to dismiss the charge and set the defendants free.

    The trial judge, Justice John Tsoho directed the defence to file its no-case submission within 21 days.

    Justice Tsoho equally asked the prosecution to file it’s response within 21 days from the day it is served with the defendants’ no-case submission.

    He also directed that the defendants would have 14 days to further reply from the day they are served with the prosecution’s response to the no-case submission.

    The judge adjourned to October 4 for parties to adopt their written submissions for and against the no-case submission.

    Dokpesi and Daar arraigned by the EFCC on charges of money laundering and procurement fraud to the tune of N2.1bn, which they allegedly received from ONSA between January and March 2015.

    They were accused of receiving the N2.1bn from ONSA, when Sambo Dasuki was in the National SecurityAdviser, as payment for a “purported contract on presidential media initiative”.

    The prosecution also alleged that Dokpesi and Daar received the N2.1bn from ONSA to prosecute the 2015 presidential media campaign for the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

    It claimed that the payment was in breach of the provisions of the Public Procurement Act, Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act and the EFCC (Establishment) Act.

  • Ex-deputy Governor, Ize-Iyamu spends first night in prison

    A former Deputy Governor of Edo state, Mr, Lucky Imasuen and a former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Governorship candidate, Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu spent their first night in prison custody after they allegedly failed to meet the bail conditions granted them by a Federal High Court.

    Others arraigned alongside Imasuen that also spent Thursday night in prison were State Chairman of the PDP, Chief Dan Orbih, a former member of the House of Representatives, Tony Azegbemi and Efe Anthony.

    They were arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on eight count charges of laundering the sum of N700 million.

    The money was believed to be part of the $115m Allison Diezani pilfered from the treasury to fund the 2015 general elections.

    They were granted bail of N10 million each, with sureties in like sum who must be in grade level 16 and above and must be house owners, with Certificates of Occupancy (C of O) that should be deposited with the court’s deputy registrar.

    Justice P.I Adjokwu remanded in custody pending when they meet their applications for bail despite plea by counsel to Ize-Iyamu, Mr Charles Edosomwan, that they be kept in the custody of the EFCC.

    However, a statement by the State Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Mr. Chris Nehikhare, explained that only one of the five could not meet his bail conditions.

    Nehikhare said the other four decided to spend the night in prison in solidarity.

    “They are all in high spirit and expected to perfect their bail condition today”.

  • Alleged forgery: Internet fraudster knows fate Friday

    Justice Serifat Solebo has fixed Friday for judgment in the charge of fraud against an Internet fraudster and popular “yahoo-yahoo boy”, Taiwo Michael Okunowo.

    Taiwo Okunowo, who goes by three other aliases including “Holy Herlich, Mark Welsh and Steven Staller”, was initially arraigned before the court on a one count charge by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The charge stated: ” Taiwo Michael Okunowo, a.k.a. “Holy Herlich, Mark Welsh and Steven Staller” on or about  December 16, 2017  made a false documents to wit Facebook, Government Compensation Winning Certificate, Treasure Grant Winners Certificate and Facebook-Brandon M. Mickey with intent to use as genuine to the prejudice of any people”.

    The offence is said to be contrary to section 363(1) of the Criminal Law of Lagos State no 11 of 2011.

    The defendant had pleaded not guilty.

    Read Also:Fraudster convicted of defrauding bank denied bail

    EFCC prosecutor, Mr. Anselem Ozioko had tendered Government Compensation Winning Certificate, Treasure Grant Winners Certificate and a Facebook account page of the defendant where he bears another name as exhibit before the court.

    But at resumed proceeding Wednesday, counsel to the defendant, Mr. John Odubela (SAN) informed the court of his client’s intention to change his plea from not guilty to guilty.

    He said that his client has entered into plea bargain agreement with the EFCC.

    Mr. Ozioko who confirmed the development did not opposed the oral application.

    He gave a review of facts of the case by the prosecution against the defendant.

    He said: “Based on the intelligence tip off of his suspicious activities and his syndicate, a convert operation was carried out by the EFCC on December 16 last year, whereupon the defendant was arrested alongside several of his partners in crime.

    “The defendant was taken to the Lagos Zonal Office of the EFCC where he was processed and the items recovered from him particularly his HP Laptop computer was analyzed through forensic examination of the EFCC ICT Lab.

    “The analysis revealed that the defendant is a carreer internet fraudster popularly known as ‘yahoo yahoo’.

    “Several documents containing false pretences were found in his possession and printed from his HP Laptop computer such as document containing conversation in which he falsely represented himself to one Michael Smith as a white female with the name Holly Herlich,” Ozioko said.

    He also asked the court to order the defendant to forfeit a Toyota Camry car, been proceed of fraud and the HP laptop been an instrument used to facilitate the forgery and fraud act.

    He urged the court to convict the defendant to one year imprisonment in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreement.

    After listen to submission of the counsels, Justice Solebo adjourned the matter till tomorrow for conviction and sentencing of the defendant.

  • N120m ‘scam’: Court rejects bail for two MDs

    An Ikeja High Court in Lagos Tuesday denied bail to two Managing Directors (MDs) – Samuel Okeke of Samadores Ltd and Aqua Rock Real Estate, and Ifeanyi Ndigwe of Iccon Communications Ltd – describing them as flight risks.

    Justice Mojisola Dada rejected their applications following opposition from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Okeke, Ndigwe, and the Managing Director (MD) of Forthright Properties Ltd, Isaac Akintoye, are standing trial alongside four firms for an alleged N120 million property scam.

    In her ruling, the judge observed that the EFCC’s claim that first defendant Okeke jumped administrative bail, and that third defendant Ndigwe had no verifiable address, were not controverted.

    Justice Dada held: “The first defendant’s bail was opposed by the prosecution on the ground that he jumped the administrative bail granted him at the EFCC office and evaded arrest until he was apprehended on May 10. The applicant’s counsel never replied to this weighty allegation in all the documents submitted before the court. I therefore hold that his application fails and bail is hereby refused.”

    Read Also: N2.4bn fraud: Court awaits Supreme Court’s decision on Innosson

    In rejecting the third defendant’s application, the judge found that “…not having a source of income or a traceable address, there are indications that he may not be available for his trial.”

    Bail was, however, granted Akintoye in the sum of N500, 000 with one surety in the like sum.

    Justice Dada adjourned till June 8 for trial.

    On May 15, the defendants pleaded “not guilty” to a 16-count charge of stealing and fraud.

    According to EFCC counsel Muhammed Bashir, the offences were committed in Lagos between November 14, 2005 and August 2014.

    The defendants allegedly received sums totaling N120m in tranches of N68,400,000, N1,800,000, N5,000,000, N6,000,000, N10,000,000, N8,500,000, among others.

    Okeke and his two firms were indicted in counts 1 to 12, Akintoye and his firms were mentioned in count 12, while Ndigwe and his company appeared in counts 13 to 16.

  • Court refuses order to unfreeze N1.9b linked to Patience Jonathan

    The Federal High Court in Lagos Thursday refused to discharge an interim order freezing N1.9 billion which was allegedly obtained fraudulently by a businesswoman, Hajiya Bola Shagaya.

    Justice Oluremi Oguntoyinbo held that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) validly obtained the order.

    Shagaya had urged the court to grant her access to her account, which had been frozen since December 29, 2016.

    Through her lawyer, Mr. Napoleon Emeaso-Nwachukwu, she claimed she was not given fair hearing before Justice Muslim Hassan of the same court made the freezing order.

    She urged Justice Oguntoyinbo to declare the freezing order unconstitutional, null and void “as same violates the applicant’s right to own movable property as guaranteed by Section 44(1)(k) of the I999 Constitution of Nigeria.”

    Read Also: EFCC gets fresh order to seize Patience Jonathan’s N7.3b, $8.4m

    But, EFCC argued that Justice Oguntoyinbo lacked the power to sit as an appellate court over Justice Hassan’s decision, describing Shagaya’s originating summons as an abuse of court processes.

    It accused Shagaya of filing the suit “so as to impede the proper dispensation of justice and thus avoiding criminal investigation and possible prosecution.”

    The anti-graft agency claimed that the N1.9billion was the balance of N3, 305,150,000, which Shagaya allegedly received as “founder fees” on behalf of an organisation “Women for Change” being spearheaded by former First Lady Dame Patience Jonathan.

    The EFCC claimed that the N3.3billion was realised through Shagaya’s “fraudulent activities in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC),” where she allegedly “influenced the fraudulent allocation of Dual Purpose kerosene to Index Petrolube Africa Ltd., with the aid of the former First Lady, Mrs. Dame Patience Jonathan.”

    According to the EFCC, the N3.3billion was paid by Index Petrolube Africa Ltd and its sister company, Autodex Nigeria Ltd.

    The two companies, it said, belong to one Honourable Ezeani ThankGod, adding that the reason for the N3.3billion payment was to “fraudulently facilitate Dual Purpose Kerosene to ThankGod’s company, Index Petrolube Africa Ltd.”

    The anti-graft agency claimed that out of the N3.3billion, Shagaya had “paid a cumulative sum of N1,212,000,000 to the former First Lady, Mrs. Dame Patience Jonathan, through her account, ‘Women for Change Initiative’ account domiciled in Diamond Bank, to which the former First Lady is the sole signatory.”

    It said after paying N1.2billion to Mrs Jonathan, Shagaya kept the balance of N1.9billion for herself by “warehousing” it in her Unity Bank account.

    The EFCC said it secured an order by Justice Hassan on December 29, 2016 to freeze the account pending the conclusion of its investigation.

    The anti-graft agency said the applicant would “use this honourable court as a shield against criminal investigation and prosecution” if the application was granted.

    In her verdict Thursday, Justice Oguntoyinbo faulted Shagaya’s claims she was not given the opportunity to defend herself.

    “The interim order was made based on an ex-parte application filed by the EFCC. An ex-parte application has no respondent and the court is not expected to hear from the other party.

    “Even when the other party is around, it can only be seen and not heard. Therefore, the failure of Justice Hassan to hear the applicant cannot invalidate the order.

    “The granting of the interim order of attachment is not unconstitutional and does not constitute an infringement on the applicant’s rights to own property”, the judge held.

    Justice Oguntoyinbo said the applicant failed to controvert EFCC’s claim that she refused to honour invitation.

    The judge said Shagaya’s claim that the order was made in perpetuity did not hold water because there was no evidence that the EFCC had concluded its investigation.

    “It is erroneous to claim that the interim order has metamorphosed into a permanent one or in perpetuity because it was to last until the conclusion of investigation by the respondent.

    “There was no evidence to show that the respondent has stopped investigating the property or has concluded investigation,” Justice Oguntoyibo said.

    The judge, therefore, held that Shagaya’s application lacked merit and dismissed it.

  • EFCC humiliated me, Nwaoboshi alleges

    The embattled Delta North Senator, Peter Nwaoboshi, Wednesday told the Senate that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) humiliated him while holding him custody over alleged N322 million fraud.

    Nwaoboshi who resumed plenary assured his colleagues he would not yield to intimidation especially when he did not do anything to warrant alleged humiliation he was subjected to by EFCC operatives.

    He noted that although he would soon have his date in court, justice would surely prevail.

    He said, “I rise to thank the Senate for standing solidly behind me during my ordeal in the hands of the EFCC; for their concern for my well-being as well as their support and solidarity.

    “As a lawyer, I am conscious of the fact that my matter is now in court. I am no longer at liberty to say anything that will impede judicious trial of the case.

    “However, I want to assure my colleagues that I have not done anything that will justify or that necessitated the humiliation I was subject to as a serving senator.

    “This roll back to the dark days of the military rule must not be allowed to hold sway under a democratic dispensation. This senate must rise up and challenge the forces and agents of oppression.

    “I want to assure this 8th senate of which I am a proud member that I refuse to be cowed or intimidated by anyone.

    “I am confident that I will have my day in court and justice will surely prevail. Once more thank you for believing in me and standing by me.”

    Read Also: Alleged N322m fraud: Nwaoboshi to spend two days in prison

  • Patience Jonathan’s $15.5m: companies’ seek guilty plea reversal

    Four companies which pleaded guilty to laundering $15.5million allegedly belonging to former First Lady Dame Patience Jonathan Wednesday urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to reverse their guilty plea.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arraigned them with a former Special Adviser on Domestic Affairs to President Jonathan, Dr Waripamo Dudafa, a lawyer Amajuoyi Briggs, who is the companies’ secretary, and a banker, Adedamola Bolodeoku.

    Unlike the companies, Dudafa, Briggs and Bolodeoku pleaded not guilty to the 17-count charge.

    The companies’ lawyer Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) told Justice Babs Kuewumi that his clients were not given a fair trial before their conviction because they had no legal representation of their choice.

    “Throughout the trial, they did not have any counsel or counsel of their choice,” the SAN said.

    He added that had the judge’s attention been drawn to it, he would have ordered the prosecution to provide a counsel for the defendants.

    Ozekhome said he was briefed to represent the companies after its directors pleaded guilty despite not being authorised by the board to do so.

    Moving his motion seeking to set aside the companies conviction, Ozekhome said the y were convicted “in gross violation” of the 1999 Constitution, which he said occasioned a miscarriage of justice.

    He prayed that the trial be done de novo (afresh) and that the previous proceedings be declared null, void and unsustainable in law.

    The application, he said, is on the ground that the court failed to pass a sentence on the convicted companies, as the judge reserved sentence until end of the other defendants’ trial.

    “The lapse in time between the conviction and expected sentence amounts not only to torture but breach of right to be tried within a reasonable time. Because there was no sentence, they cannot exercise their right of appeal,” he said.

    Besides, Ozekhome said the directors who pleaded guilty were not authorised by the board to defend the companies, adding that his clients were denied the right to cross-examine the purported directors.

    “They’re just busybodies and interlopers who were pressure to come and plead guilty. They had no mandate to do so,” he said.

    The defence counsel said the companies’ conviction was “grossly unfair” and amounted to “justice crushed” due to non-compliance with Section 36 of the 1999 constitution which requires than an accused be given adequate facilities to defend himself.

    “We urge my lord to set aside this manifest, manifold travesty of justice. We need a trial de novo. We are crying on bended knees. The companies want to be tried, but they want to be defended in this trial, not ‘nicodemusly’, but in the public,” he said.

    But, prosecuting counsel Rotimi Oyedepo urged the court to refuse the application for being an abuse of court process.

    According to him, it amounted to asking the judge to revisit his ruling and to assume the position of an appellate court.

    “Your Lordship is functus officio (a doctrine which prevents the re-opening of a matter before the same court),” he said, adding that the companies have a right to appeal their conviction.

    “Re-inviting my lord to change his earlier findings is like asking him to return to Egypt when he has crossed the red sea. This application is asking my lord to constitute himself into an appellate court. This application is a violent abuse of process of this court and should be frowned at,” Oyedepo said.

    He denied that the directors who pleaded guilty were not authorised to do so, saying there was evidence that they were indeed the companies’ directors from the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and from the companies’ bank accounts.

    Justice Kuewumi adjourned until July 3 for ruling and hearing of a pending by Briggs.

  • Court grants interim forfeiture of Patience Jonathan’s property

    A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Monday, granted an interim forfeiture order of a property belonging to former first lady, Mrs Patience Jonathan.

    Justice Nnamdi Dimgba, who granted the order, held that it was to enable the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) investigate the acquisition of Ariwabai Aruera Reachout Foundation, a property liked to Mrs Jonathan.

    Dimba however held that the order would elapse after 45 days.

    The EFCC had filed an exparte motion seeking temporary forfeiture of some properties allegedly belonging to Ariwabai Aruera Reachout Foundation.

    The properties are said to be located at plot 1758, Cadastral Zone, B06 Mabushi and Plot No.1350, Cadastral Zone, Central Business District, Abuja.

    The anti-graft agency also asked the court for an order stopping any disposal, conveyance, mortgage, lease, sale or alienation or otherwise of the properties.

    “An order authorizing the EFCC to appoint competent person(s)/firm to manage the asset/property listed in the schedule herein, temporarily forfeited to the Federal Government pending the conclusion of investigation.”

    The agency said application was predicated on the fact that the property was a subject matter of investigation, inquiry and examination.

    The judge in his ruling on the exparte motion, granted the EFCC a 45-day of grace period within which to investigate whether the property was acquired by Jonathan with proceeds of crime.

    “I have carefully considered the processes filed. I have also carefully considered the arguments.

    “Accordingly, a period of 45 days is accorded to the EFCC to investigate whether the properties in question were acquired with the proceeds of crime.”

    The judge also dismissed the motion challenging the originating summons.

    Patience Jonathan’s counsel, Mr Mike Ozekhome (SAN), in his reaction to the court’s ruling, said it was a well considered judgment.

    “We did not lose; we won,’’ he said.

    “What the EFCC wanted was for the property in dispute to be attached and forfeited to the government but the court refused, instead, gave them 45 days to further investigate and prosecute if they so wish with liberty to apply for renewal,” he said.

    NAN