Tag: Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)

  • Absence of prosecution witness stalls Ladoja’s trial

    Absence of prosecution witness stalls Ladoja’s trial

    The absence of a prosecution witness Thursday stalled the trial of former Oyo State Governor Chief Rasheed Ladoja.

    The trial will resume on February 12 and continue on 14 and 15 next year.

    The witness was said to be attending to some urgent family issue.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) re-arraigned Ladoja for allegedly converting N4.7billion from the state treasury to his personal use.

    He was charged along with Waheed Akanbi on eight counts of money laundering and unlawful conversion of public funds.

    They pleaded not guilty.

    Ladoja was governor from May 29, 2003 to January 12, 2006 when he was impeached.

    On November 1, 2006, the Appeal Court Ibadan, declared the impeachment null and illegal.

    The Supreme Court upheld the decision on November 11, 2009, and Ladajo resumed office on December 12, 2006.

    He, however, lost a re-election bid.

  • Patience Jonathan’s $15.5m: Lawyers disagree over representation

    Patience Jonathan’s $15.5m: Lawyers disagree over representation

    There was a mild drama at the Federal High Court in Lagos yesterday as two lawyers engaged in an argument over who to represent four firms that pleaded guilty to laundering $15.5million allegedly belonging to Patience Jonathan.

    The companies through their representatives pleaded guilty last September 15 and were convicted for laundering the money when they were arraigned in a criminal charge before Justice Babs Kuewumi.

    They admitted laundering the money allegedly belonging to wife of former President Goodluck Jonathan, Dame Patience.

    But the law firm of Mike Ozekhome Chambers filed an application on May 8 on the companies’ behalf seeking to set aside the guilty plea.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) has filed a counter affidavit opposing the application.

    The former first lady is also praying the court to unfreeze the accounts in a separate suit.

    The companies are: Pluto Property and Investment Company Ltd (represented by Friday Davis), Seagate Property Development and Investment Company Ltd (represented by Agbor Baro), Trans Ocean Property and Investment Company Ltd (represented by Dioghowori Frederick) and Avalon Global Property Development Ltd (represented by Taiwo Ebenezer).

    EFCC arraigned them with a former Special Adviser on Domestic Affairs to President Jonathan, Waripamo Dudafa, a lawyer, Amajuoyi Briggs and a banker, Adedamola Bolodeoku.

    Dudafa, Briggs and Bolodeoku pleaded not guilty to the 17-count charge.

    Beside the application filed by Ozekhome Chambers, another motion to set aside the guilty plea was filed by Briggs, who was the companies’ secretary, through his lawyer Ige Asemudara.

    Yesterday, Chima Onuigbo, who stood in for Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), said he was served with the prosecution’s counter affidavit on Tuesday.

    He sought an adjournment to enable the companies respond.

    Another lawyer, Luke Aghanenu, also appeared  for the companies.

    He claimed he was engaged by the companies’ representatives as their authentic counsel.

    According to him, he is the one who ought to speak on the companies’ behalf, not Onuigbo.

    But, Onuigbo said Mike Ozekhome Chambers was engaged by Briggs to represent the companies.

    He said Ozekhome had been appearing for the companies, saying he was surprised by the new counsel’s appearance.

    He described Aghanenu as an “interloper”, saying he should have filed a proper application.

    Resolving the issue after a long argument, Justice Kuewumi asked Aghanenu to file a formal notice of appearance as the companies’ representatives.

    Asemudara said he was also served with EFCC’s counter affidavit on Tuesday.

    Dudafa’s lawyer Gbenga Oyewole (SAN) said he was not served.

    “As long as we’re involved in this proceedings we are entitled to be served,” he said.

    EFCC’s lawyer Rotimi Oyedepo said since the application was challenging the validity of companies’ plea, it could be heard and judgment delivered at the end of the trial.

    This, he said, would be in line with Section 396 (2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of 2015.

    “I apply that the trial should continue,” he said.

    But, Asemudara said his client was challenging the guilty plea and not the charge, so it should be taken first and ruling delivered before further proceedings.

    He said Oyedepo’s submission was misconceived, adding the case of the second defendant was “intricately connected” with the fourth to seventh defendants’ (the companies).

    He accused the prosecution of delaying the case, saying previous adjournments were at its instance.

    Urging the court to hear the application and deliver judgment, he added: “We don’t want our client to fear they were not given fair hearing.”

    Ruling, Justice Babs Kuewumi held that the application would be heard and determined before the prosecution witness continues with his evidence.

    “Section 396 (2) which says the delivery of the ruling shall be considered at the point of judgment does not apply to this type of application,” he said.

    The judge noted that EFCC’s late filing of its counter-affidavit necessitated the adjournment.

    Justice Kuewumi adjourned until December 12 for hearing of pending applications.

  • No going back on Ekpeyong, Oke’s arrest, says Magu

    No going back on Ekpeyong, Oke’s arrest, says Magu

    Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Magu on Wednesday said that he was not discouraged about Tuesday’s failed attempt to arrest former Director-General of the Department of State Security (DSS), Ita Ekpeyong, and former head of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), Ayo Oke.

    He spoke with State House journalists after he attended the inauguration of the committee on recoveries by President Muhammadu Buhari at State House, Abuja.

    Stressing that no one is above the law; he said that the agency has concrete evidence against the former heads of DSS and NIA.

    He insisted that the law will take its course.

    Ekpeyong Ita is being investigated for offences bordering on alleged theft and diversion of public funds in the arms deal saga involving a former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.), and other service chiefs who have since been arraigned.

    Oke, who was recently sacked by President Buhari for allegedly stashing away N13 billion in the Ikoyi apartment, is reported to have refused not to honour invitations for over three weeks.

    Armed guards of the NIA and DSS on Tuesday in Asokoro district of Abuja were reported to have prevented officials of the EFCC from arresting their former bosses residing in the area.

  • EFCC operatives invade ex-DSS DG’s house

    EFCC operatives invade ex-DSS DG’s house

    Some operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) have invaded the residence of a former Director-General of the Department of State Security Service (DSS), Mr. Ita Ekpenyong to arrest him.

    Ekpenyong is allegedly wanted in connection with the ongoing probe of alleged $2.1billion arms procurement during the administration of ex-president Goodluck Jonathan.

    But moves to arrest the ex-DG was however being resisted by DSS operatives on guard at the residence.

    Details later…

    Read Also: EFCC finds N650m in accounts linked with Maina

  • EFCC confirms arrest of former SGF, Anyim

    EFCC confirms arrest of former SGF, Anyim

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has confirmed the arrest of former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Sen. Anyim Pius Anyim.

    Spokesman of the commission, Mr Wilson Uwujaren, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Friday that Anyim was being held over an “ongoing investigation”.

    Uwujaren did not give details.

    Anyim was President of the Senate between 2000 and 2003, and served as SGF under the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan.

  • Patience Jonathan begs court to unfreeze accounts with N3.5b, $5.8m

    Patience Jonathan begs court to unfreeze accounts with N3.5b, $5.8m

    Wife of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, Patience has asked a Federal High Court to lift the temporary freeze issued on 16 accounts allegedly held in banks by her and some firms linked to her.

    The accounts, said to contain $5.8million and N3.5 billion, are domicile in Zenith Skye, Eco, Fidelity, Stanbic IBTC and Diamond banks.

    Mrs. Jonathan’s request is contained in a motion she filed before the court, and in which she faulted the method adopted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in obtaining two ex-parte interim freezing orders on the accounts.

    She contended that the freezing orders have lapsed and should be vacated having been first made on May 30 this year and renewed on October 10.

    Mrs. Jonathan said the accounts were maintained by her, the Incorporated Trustees of her foundation -Ariwabai Aruera Reachout Foundation – and nine other companies in which she has interest.

    She argued that the orders of interim forfeiture made on May 30, 2017 including a subsequent one issued on October 10, 2017 have become spent and could no longer be extended, because the original order was obtained through an improper use of court process by the EFCC.

    She stated, in the motion filed by her lawyer, Mike Ozekhome (SAN) that the Federal High Court in Abuja, on May 30 , 2017 granted an ex-parte order in favour of the of the Federal Government against all the accounts own and operated by her and the companies

    She said the same FG later went before the Lagos division of the court, presided over by Justice C.M.A Olatoregun to obtain similar order on October 10 this year in respect of accounts held by her, Finchley Top Homes limited and Ariwabai Aruera Reachout Foundation.

    Mrs. Jonathan stated that prior to the grant of the ex -parte motion  by the court in Abuja the FGhad filed a similar application before Justice Olatoregun of Lagos division but failed to disclose the fact that it had obtained same reliefs in Lagos.

    She added that the owners of the money were never served with the interim order and that they became aware of it during a hearing of a petition she lodged at the National Assembly.

    When the case was called yesterday before Justice Binta Nyako, Osekhome urged the court to first, here his client’s motion before the one filed by the EFCC for the extension of the orders earlier made by the court.

    Lawyer to the EFCC, Richard Dauda also insisted that his application should take precedence.

    Justice Nyako however, adjourned to November 23.

  • EFCC: Stakeholders defer on seven percent IGR retention, autonomous FIU

    EFCC: Stakeholders defer on seven percent IGR retention, autonomous FIU

    The Nigerian Law Reform Commission (NLRC) has kicked against the retention of seven percent of recovered assets or internally generated revenue (IGR) by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The NLRC also disapproved of a Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) responsible to the EFCC, stating that an independent FIU devoid of the anti-graft agency’s supervision would serve the country better.

    The agency as well as the Governors’ Forum wanted the FIU domiciled within the EFCC despite the suspension of the country from the Egmont group due to interference from the anti-graft agency.

    Speaking at a public hearing on three bills on the amendment of EFCC Act Wednesday, a Commissioner at the NLRC, Prof. Jumai Audi said the retention of seven percent from recovered property or income generated by the EFCC is unethical and capable of encouraging corruption within the agency.

    She said the anti-graft agency does not need additional fund to carry out its activities and should not be indulge with finds it does not need by government.

    She said: “EFCC does not need additional funding and does not need to retain any money or property they recovered. Their statutory allocating is enough.

    “Asking it to retain seven percent of its IGR or recovered property is morally wrong and illegal. EFCC can ask for supplementary budget if there is a need for it.

    “EFCC is not an income generating agency because and it’s workers are duty bound to carry out their duties. If they are indulged with funds they don’t need, there is every likelihood that the workers will go in strike one day if they feel aggrieved due to issue of funding”.

    On the independence of FIU, Audi said it was the undue interference from EFCC that led to the country’s suspension from the Egmont group.

    As a result, the NLRC opined that the unit should be separated from the EFCC and given the necessary support required to be effective.

    “We recommend the establishment of NFIU as an independent and autonomous body separate from EFCC rather than as a unit domiciled in EFCC as proposed in the bills.

    “Nigeria was suspended from the Egmont group for lack of autonomy in the real sense of the NFIU and this position has not been addressed.

    “The Egmont group requires that the FIU be independent and autonomous to guarantee its effectiveness in countering terrorist financing, money laundering and fighting corruption,” she added.

    However, the EFCC insisted that an autonomous FIU will not serve the purpose it was meant for.

    EFCC Secretary, Adegboyega Aremo said the FIU must be protected from politicians and the EFCC offers the most effective window to achieve that.

    “If you leave it to survive alone it will be endangered and exposed to danger.

    “In the entire universe only three tiny countries have autonomous FIUs and what Egmont group wants is for it to have autonomy within the EFCC,” he said.

    The Director General of Nigeria Governors​Forum (NGF), Ashishana Okauru aligned with the position of the House and the agency.

    Okauru, who was the first head of the unit at inception said, “As a foundation member of EFCC, I know what the Egmont group wants and it is autonomy within the EFCC.

    “It’s baffling that 10 years after we were registered by Egmont group we’ve been suspended and we stand to lose more if we are finally expelled from the group.

    “From Nigeria we may not be able to make scholarship payments and card monies may not be honored if we are finally expelled.

    “This is a subject we should dispense quickly because I remember that almost every agency opposed it when it first began.

    “I align with the position of the Committee; the FIU should be domiciled within the EFCC”.

    The Kayode Oladele – led Committee on Financial Crimes however noted that the retention of certain percentage of IGR is not new to government agencies.

    Saying that the case of EFCC should not be an exception, Oladele said the seven percent fund would not encourage corruption but enhance the execution of the primary duties of the anti-graft agency.

    He said: “There is nothing strange for agencies to retain part of their IGR to execute their mandates and we don’t think EFCC should be an exception.

    “Funding for anti-graft agencies is not an issue for now because we have a government that has the political will to fight corruption and that is why it is empowering them but what happens if a government that is not too keen on fighting corruption is in power?

    “This extra funding will not encourage corruption but encourage them to do more, just like this whistle blower policy that is now giving Nigerians the impetus to come forward.

    “Meanwhile, if it is agreed that the extra funding is not necessary then the House has no option than to remove it based on stakeholders decision”.

    On the need to amend the EFCC Act, Oladele said most transactions now takes place on electronic platforms and place additional pressure on our anti-corruption agencies in understanding and smashing the sophisticated networks of unscrupulous elements in the society.

    “The House is conscious of the growing need of anti-graft agencies in a rapidly evolving information age.

    “It entails continuous updating of their equipment and tools, regular re-training, as well as cross-border collaboration with other countries and bon-state entities.

    “It also entails that the operations of our anti-corruption agencies are in line with the rule of law and international best practices,” he added.

    Earlier while declaring the public hearing open, the Speaker, Yakubu Dogara explained why the exercise became imperative.

    Represented by the Deputy Whip, Pally Iriase, the Speaker said, “No country can develop with the high level of corruption in Nigeria.

    “Despite various government efforts to enact laws to curb corruption it is fast threatening our culture in Nigeria but once these laws are passed it will clear some of these internal and external challenges”

     

  • How Oronsaye, Maina diverted pension funds, by EFCC

    How Oronsaye, Maina diverted pension funds, by EFCC

    A Federal High Court in Abuja heard Tuesday how huge sums belonging to pensioners were allegedly diverted by former Head of Service of the Federation (HOSF), Stephen Oronsaye and former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms, Abdulrasheed  Maina through phoney contracts.

    An operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Rouqayya Ibrahim said pension funds were allegedly diverted by the duo through various companies.

    Rouqayya spoke Tuesday while testifying as a prosecution witness in the trial of Orosaye, the Managing Director of Fredrick Hamilton Global Services Limited, Osarenkhoe Afe and the company on a 24-count charge bordering on stealing and obtaining money by false pretence.

    They are alleged to have been involved in several contract awards during Oronsaye’s tenure as HOS.

    The prosecution alleged the fraud, involving about N2 billion, was allegedly perpetrated using firms like Cluster Logistic Limited, Kongolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, Drew Investment and Construction Company Limited, and Xangee Technologies Limited.

    Led in evidence by lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), Rouqayya said in the course of investigations, the EFCC requested for payment mandate from the office of the Head of Service (HOS).

    She said: “We analysed the mandate, obtained necessary information like bank account numbers, and then requested for the account statements from the banks,” she said.

    She stated that the analysis revealed a company, Xangee Technologies Limited, which she noted, was already being tried before Justice Abubakar Talba of the High Court of thr Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Gudu, for alleged pension fraud.

    The witness said: “We discovered that the company received payment of more than N183 million for biometric enrolment, but there was no biometric contract executed by the company, instead the money was withdrawn cash, converted to US dollars and handed over to Abdulrasheed Maina, through his brother, Khalid Biu,”

    She added that three other companies – Mofshad Ventures, Mofshad Limited and Kombosko Nigeria Limited, received more than N400 million for non-existent contracts.

    The witness said: “We discovered that the three companies were associated with one Emmanuel Olanipekun, who is also currently standing trial, and one Chidi, also standing trial, and the monies were withdrawn in cash with part of it given to Mr. Oronsaye.”

    She said investigation of the pension account in Union Bank showed that there was a letter, instructing that the money be transferred to another pension account.

    “We saw another letter on it, on which there was a minute and instruction from Mr. Oronsaye, to transfer about N113 million to a Unity Bank account belonging to the State House, which we discovered he was the sole-signatory.

    “As at the time the transfer was made in 2010, Mr. Oronsaye had ceased to be the Principal Secretary in the State House and had become the Head of Service. We discovered that the monies were withdrawn through cheques, but all efforts to get the person to whom they were issued to, was unsuccessful, and Mr. Oronsaye could not explain the reason for the disbursement,” the witness said.

    Rouqayya further investigation of such suspicious transfers led investigators to discover six accounts in Fidelity Bank in the name of Faizal Abdullahi, Mafisa Abdullahi, Kongolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, Drew Investment and Construction Company Limited, and Cluster Logistic Limited.

    She said: “There was also another account in the name of Abdulrasheed Maina, and his brother, Biu, a staff of the bank, who opened the accounts and was the accounts officer.” She added that  after Biu resigned from the bank, Toyin Meseke, a staff of the bank took over as the account officer.

    The witness said: “We invited him for an interview and discovered that all the accounts were operated by Abdulrasheed Maina, even though his name, picture and signature were not anywhere in the opening account packages.”

    She said Maina operated the account mainly through text messages and emails, as “instructions regarding payment or withdrawal were sent to Meseke by text or email”.

    Rouqayya said forensic analysis of Meseke’s phone was carried out, which revealed how funds were fraudulently diverted from the account. She added: “The account officer will, after receiving instruction from Maina, convert the money to US dollars and deliver same to him in Dubai.”

    According to her, Maina, a former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms remained at large.  She said Maina never showed up in the course of investigations, and deserted his known residence.

    The witness, who said investigations showed that Maina paid cash of $2 million to buy a house in Jabi, told the court that apart from the Interpol notice issued for Maina’s arrest, “we are still doing all we can, but yet to get hold of him.”

    Earlier, Jacobs tendered three statements made to EFCC’s investigators by Oronsaye, during the course of investigations. The statements were identified by Ibrahim and were admitted in evidence by the court when defence lawyers, Joe Agi (for Oronsaye) and Oluwole Aladedoye (for Afe and his company) failed to object.

    In reaction to complaint by Aladedoye that the EFCC was sponsoring media publications meant to prejudice the trial, the trial judge, Justice Gabriel Kolawole warned the EFCC to desist from such practice.

    The judge said he read some of the publications handed to the court by Aladedoye and found that the information were ascribed to the EFCC. He said that was the second time such incident would happen in the cases being prosecuted in his court by the EFCC.

    The judge warned that should such occur the third time, he would not hesitate to hands off the case and return the file to the court’s Chief judge to allow the EFCC try its cases and secure conviction through the media.

    Justice Kolawole said it was wrong for the EFCC to release documents, in relation to a case pending in court, to the media, even when such documents were yet to be tendered in court.

    He said he was not against the media covering court’s proceedings, but was not comfortable where publications are made to prejudice pending proceedings.

    Justice Kolawole adjourned to December 5, 2017 for continuation of the judicial trial.

     

  • Falana urges NASS to pass whistle-blowing protection bill

    Falana urges NASS to pass whistle-blowing protection bill

    Femi Falana, a Human Right Activist, has called on the National Assembly ( NASS ) to hasten the passage of the Whistle-blowing Protection Bill to facilitate the fight against corruption in the country.

    Falana made the call on Tuesday in Abuja at the National Stakeholders’ Summit on Whistle-blowing, organised by the African Centre for Media and Information Literacy ( AFRIMIL ).

    He said that the bill, when passed, would facilitate the fight against corruption by protecting persons with potential and reliable information on the war against corruption.

    “The bill amongst other things aims at ensuring that persons, who make disclosures about corruption do not suffer reprisals in relation to such disclosures and are duly protected by the law,” he said.

    The activist also called for proper implementation of the whistle-blowing policy, adding that it was the duty of every citizen to report crimes for societal change.

    He decried the attitude of brutal attacks on whistle-blowers and numerous challenges faced by them, which included denial of entitlements, charge to court, attacks and murder.

    Falana, however, appealed that recovered loots should not be channeled towards funding the budget but rather should be a special funding in the country.

    “Unless we convince the government to uphold the protection of fighting corruption, all the suggestions are meaningless,’’ he added.

    Falana tasked whistle-blowers not to limit their monitoring to Independent Corrupt Practices Commission ( ICPC ) and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) but to spread it to other agencies.

    He pledged to take up any matter concerning harassment of whistle-blowers once reported.

    Earlier, Mr Chido Onumah, Coordination of the centre, said that as part of its accountability and governance initiative, it inaugurated the Corruption Anonymous (CORA) project, which aimed at engaging civil society and Nigerians in tackling corruption.

    “The CORA project, which is supported by ‘The John D and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,’ is aimed at creating awareness about whistle-blowing and making Nigerians see it as a tool for reducing corruption,’’ he said.

    Onumah recalled that the Federal Government in December 2016 announced a Whistle-Blower policy, which could offer financial incentives for citizens who give genuine information that could lead to recovery of loots.

    He noted that the summit with the theme: ‘Fight Against Corruption: Harnessing the Whistle-blowing Opportunity’ was one of its interventions designed for critical stakeholders responsible for its implementation.

    “Whistle-blowing, as an instrument of tackling corruption, can only survive where the safety of whistle-blower is guaranteed ,” he noted.

    AFRIMIL, an NGO, which focuses on media, information, research, advocacy and training is dedicated to providing skills required for social engagement.

    NAN

  • SAN, ex-minister signed for ‘N450m Diezani cash’, says witness

    SAN, ex-minister signed for ‘N450m Diezani cash’, says witness

    The Federal High Court in Lagos Monday heard that a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Mohammed Belgore and a former minister of National Planning Prof Abubakar Suleiman admitted collecting 450million in cash from Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke without going through a financial institution.

    An Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) investigator, Usman Zakari, said they also signed for the money.

    Under cross examination by Belgore’s lawyer Ebun Shofunde (SAN), he said: “The two defendants admitted signing the receipt of payment with which they collected the sum of N450 million. The first defendant (Belgore) particularly admitted disbursing the money.”

    However, Zakari said this was not contained in a statement he wrote at the end of his investigation.

    On the timeline of events leading to the defendants’ arrest, Shofunde asked: “Am I correct to say that the event leading to this charge took place between December 2014 to March 2015?”

    The witness responded: “No, it commenced from November 2014 to March 2015.”

    Shofunde then suggested: “I put it to you that at no time did the defendant admit to you that he collected the sum of N450million.”

    The witness replied that Belgore admitted appending his signature on the payment receipt.

    He denied a suggestion that the accused person did not admit making disbursement of the funds. “That is not correct,” Zakari said.

    On whether he confronted the accused with a list produced by Belgore on cash disbursement (exhibit seven), the witness replied: “I did not”

    Suleiman’s lawyer Chief Tunji Ayanlaja (SAN) asked Zakari: “Did you find anything incriminating against him (Suleiman)?” The witness said: “Yes, my Lord.”

    The SAN said: “The purpose of your investigation was to find things incriminating against him,” to which Zakari responded: “Yes.”

    The witness denied Ayanlaja’s suggestion that the money remained in the bank till March 28, 2015, saying: “That’s not correct”, before admitting that the bank would be in a better position to say when the N450million left.

    Prosecuting counsel Rotimi Oyedepo said EFCC intends to amend the charge to reflect Exhibit Seven.

    According to him, the amendment was necessary to accommodate all evidence at the commission’s disposal.

    “We intend to amend the charge in line with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015 and the evidences with us. The law is that we can amend any time before judgment is delivered,” the lawyer said.

    EFCC said former Petroleum Resources Minister Alison-Madueke allegedly shared $115,010,000 (about N41.4billion) to different individuals in 36 states ahead of the 2015 general election.

    It accused Belgore and Suleiman of directly receiving N450million in cash from Alison-Madueke without going through a financial institution.

    They pleaded not guilty.

    The money they received, the commission said, was shared to electoral officers and others in Kwara State.

    The alleged offence contravened sections 1 (a), 16 (d) and 18 (a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) (Amendment) Act 2012 and punishable under Section 16 (2) (b).

    Justice Rilwan Aikawa adjourned until November 24 for continuation of trial.

    Read Also: Court: Diezani’s application for trial in Nigeria bizarre, misconceived