Tag: Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)

  • Saraki to FG: I’m not perturbed by your appeal suit

    Saraki to FG: I’m not perturbed by your appeal suit

    Senate President Bukola Saraki boasted Friday that the appeal filed by the Federal Government challenging his acquittal by the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) will go the way of his original trial for false declaration of assets.

    Saraki,in his first reaction to the filing of the appeal by the federal government said he was “confident that the verdict at the appellate court would not be different from that of the tribunal as the facts of the case remain the same and the grounds on which the decision of the CCT was based remain unassailable.”

    He spoke in a statement by his Special Adviser on Media and Public Affairs, Yusuph Olaniyonu.

    “Anybody who has been following the proceedings and the evidence given by the prosecution witnesses during examination in chief and cross examination would know that if presented before any court of Justice and law, the same outcome as in the CCT would be arrived at,” Olaniyonu said.

    “Those who are running commentary on the ruling by the Tribunal and criticizing it are those who are not even familiar with the case and the details coming out of the trial.

    “That is why Dr. Saraki continues to wonder how desperate some people in government and their collaborators outside have become to pull him down at all cost and by all means up to the point that they do not care if they destroy the institution of the judiciary in the process.

    “That is why they sponsored stories of allegation of bribery in an online publication against the Tribunal judges.

    “The Senate President seizes this opportunity to call on security agencies to immediately commence investigation on this bribery allegation.”

    Saraki wants those who made the allegation to be invited to substantiate their claims.

    He cited the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Anti-Corruption (PACAC), Professor Itse Sagay as one of such people.

    Continuing, Olaniyonu said: “Corruption is not just about giving or diverting money. When an official interferes with the judicial process with a view to achieving personal objectives, which is corruption.

    “We hear the same desperate people say there was so much evidence they are surprised at the verdict of the tribunal. But they forget to mention that this was a case that the prosecution counsel amended charges thrice.

    “If as it is being portrayed to the public it was a straight forward case following investigation how come every time their case was dismantled during the process they went back to amend charges just in desperation to get a conviction?

    “The Senate President notes that another sign of desperation by those who want to get him convicted at all cost was the failed antics of the prosecution counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacob who in collusion with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) sought to manipulate evidence at the tribunal.

    “On realizing the fundamental flaw in its case as it did not invite the defendant to make any statement at any point in the investigation, the prosecution brought in an agent of the EFCC to tender old statements Saraki made in a totally different and unrelated matter that had nothing to do with false asset declaration. The prosecution forgot that the letter inviting Saraki to make the tendered statements explicitly mentioned the matter being investigated. However, the tribunal, as it is obvious in its ruling, saw through the dirty trick. It therefore disregarded that piece of evidence and described it as irrelevant and of no value to the case,” he said.

    He said that all the evidence provided during the trial by CCT were all EFCC evidence adding that the CB chief prosecutor testified that he got his instruction to investigate the case orally.

    “He made his report from the investigation orally. Even the directive to ‘collaborate with EFCC’ on the investigation was given orally, a development the tribunal found strange and unknown to law. ‎

    “All these antics aimed at perverting the course of justice were obvious throughout the period of the tribunal’s sitting. Though, one is conscious of the fact that the anti- graft agency and its ally bodies are frantically looking for a poster-case to sell its anti-corruption campaign and there is the hunger for conviction in a celebrated case to advertise in the international arena government’s determination to pursue the anti-graft campaign, we implore them to achieve this aim by allowing Justice to take its normal course.

    “This Appeal against the CCT ruling is nothing but another attempt to grandstand and embark on another media trial without any substance. This is why the Senate President is sure it will be another exercise in futility.”

    Dr. Saraki has demonstrated his unflinching belief in and respect for the judicial process and its ability to resolve issues relating to fundamental rights of Nigerians. That belief in the judiciary is the basis for his assurance that the position of the CCT that he is not guilty of the charges preferred against him would be  sustained in the higher courts.

     

  • Destruction of evidence: Judge’s absence stalls Metuh’s trial

    Destruction of evidence: Judge’s absence stalls Metuh’s trial

    The absence from court Thursday, of the Chief Judge of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Justice Ishaq Bello stalled proceedings in the trial of former spokesman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh for allegedly destroying evidence earlier submitted to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The judge’s absence served Metuh’s interest as he had been reluctant in opening his defence about eight months after the prosecution, led by Sylvanus Tahir, closed its case on October 10, 2016 having called three witnesses.

    Justice Bello was said to have attended a valedictory court session in honour of the pioneer judge of the High Court of the FCT, Justice Victoria Onejeme, who died on April 27 this year at 87 years.

    The EFCC alleged, in a three-count charge it brought against Metuh, that he destroyed the statement he made under caution to the agency’s operatives and investigators on January 5, 2016 while in custody.

    The prosecution alleged that the ex-spokesperson for the PDP “destroyed document to prevent its production as evidence”, thereby committing an offence which is said to be punishable under Section 166 of the Penal Code CAP 532 LFN, Abuja (2004).

    It also alleged that the destruction of evidence amounted to “mischief”, an offence said to be contrary to Section 326 and punishable under Section 327 of the Penal Code.

    Metuh pleaded not guilty to the two counts when he was arraigned about a year ago on January 21, 2016.

    The case has been further adjourned to July 4

    The prosecution had on February 26, 2016, through its first witness, Junaid Said, gave details of how Metuh tore a sheet of the four-sheet statement he made to interrogators at the EFCC.

    Said said; “My Lord, when he concluded writing his statement which was on four sheets of the EFCC statement form, I collected the statement and read over it, I then handed the statement over to my superiors Musa and Wetkas. When I was handing over the statement, the defendant said he was surprised that he had written that much and that he felt he had given too much information.

    “Because of the comment, I was worried I gave him the statement sheets one after the other for endorsement. He endorsed the first and second sheet, but tore the third sheet. The third sheet was where the defendant (Metuh) disclosed that he received the money for PDP political activities, settle his personal needs and made reference to former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    “My lord, he suddenly tore the statement sheet into pieces, in great shock and surprise I stood up I asked him why he did what he did? He said he did that because he was no longer willing to give the information on that statement sheet.

    “I then requested the pieces of the statement, he declined and attempted to put them in his pocket, I then cautioned him and told him to respect himself he insisted that he was going to dispose the tore sheet.

    “I persuaded him to handover the tore sheet and brought one plain paper before him, he poured the pieces on the plain sheet, my other colleagues were there looking at us in surprise as well. He furthered tore them into pieces, saying only in the movies would this be recovered.

    “I poured the pieces in the commission’s transparent polythene bag for exhibit and made entry of the incident into the EFCC’s incident duty station diary as well as EFCC’s pocket notebook. Later, in the day he requested to make additional statement, which he made, wrote his name and signed but declined to make any other statement on the torn paper.’’

    The EFCC’s incident duty station diary, EFCC’s pocket notebook and pieces of the torn statement were tendered and admitted as exhibits.

     

  • Court remands Jumoke Akinjide, Otiti in EFCC custody

    Court remands Jumoke Akinjide, Otiti in EFCC custody

    A Federal High Court sitting in Ibadan has ordered that a former Minister of Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Oloye Jumoke Akinjide and another chieftain of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in Oyo state, Chief Olanrewaju Otiti be remanded in the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over the N650 million fraud allegedly collected to fund the 2015 election in the state.

    The court also ordered the anti-graft body to produce unfailingly the second defendant in the case, Senator Ayoade Adeseun who has failed to appear in court to face trial over the alleged fraud.

    At Thursday’s hearing , counsel to the first and second defendants,  Oloye Jumoke Akinjide  and Senator Ayoade Adeseun ( at large)  , Chief Bolaji Ayorinde SAN  and Chief Michael Lana announced their withdrawal from the case amidst heated argument over a ruling by the presiding Judge , Justice Joyce Abdul-Malik .

    In charge no FHC/IB/26c/2017, the defendants were accused to have conspired to take possession of N650millon unlawfully and committed an offence contrary to Section 18 (a) of the money laundry Act, 2012 and punishable under Section 15 (3) & 4 of the Act.

    Before the court took the plea of the defendants, Justice Abdul-Malik ordered that the12 count charge be read out to the defendants, to which they pleaded not guilty.

    Some of the count charge reads in part ” That you Mrs Diezani Alison – Madueke ( still at large) , Oloye Jumoke Akinjide , Senator AYO Ademola Adeseun and Chief Olanrewaju Otiti on or about the 26th day of March , 2015 , in Nigeria within the jurisdiction of this honourable court conspired amongst yourselves to directly take possession of the N650million which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section (18) of the Money Laundering Act , 2012 and punishable under Section 15(3) & 4 of the same Act.

    The counsel to the first defendant ( Oloye Jumoke Akinjide) , Chief Bolaji Ayorinde SAN in his submission urged the court to refuse an alleged defective  prosecution applications dated 9 March , 2017 and 20 March , 2017 for not having the seal of the Nigerian Bar Association ( NBA) .

    He said it was improper for prosecution counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, to seek to substitute a charge without an order or permission of the court.

    He challenged the EFCC counsel for seeking to replace the originating charge  with another charge sheet dated 20 March , contending that the charge sheet to be amended is defective.

    Also, Chief Michael Lana, counsel to second defendant, Senator Ayo Adeseun, while supporting the position of Chief Ayorinde SAN submitted that once there is no seal in a charge sheet, it is deemed not to have been filed.

    The EFCC counsel, Mr Oyedepo, while reacting, argued that the contentious charge sheet is competent and valid before the court, since it carried a receipt issued by the NBA.

    In resolving the issue, Justice Abdul-Malik, after listening to the submission of the counsel ruled that the court would not harbour any charge sheet not bearing the seal of the NBA, but ordered that the prosecution counsel could substitute the defective charge with the one with the NBA receipt.

    There was, however, emotional outburst, while the prosecution counsel was seeking to substitute the charge sheet ,as the defendant counsel rose against it , which led to the decision of the two defendant counsel to announce their withdrawal from the case.

    Earlier, the first defendant, Oloye Jumoke Akinjide through an application sought to enter into plea bargain, as well as the third defendant, Chief Otiti Olanrewaju.

    The prosecution counsel, Mr Oyedepo informed the court also that the parties have agreed on the plea bargain agreement and that negotiation has commenced.

    Counsel to the third defendant (Chief Olanrewaju Otiti), Adeniyi Ishola, while aligning himself to the plea bargain agreement, also moved application for bail for the third defendant.

    The presiding Judge, Justice Abdul-Malik who ordered the defendants to be remanded in EFCC custody adjourned the case to 12 September, while hearing on the bail application for the third defendant was adjourned to
    6 July, 2017.

     

  • Fani-Kayode challenges court’s jurisdiction to try him for ‘money laundering’

    Fani-Kayode challenges court’s jurisdiction to try him for ‘money laundering’

    …EFCC seeks to tender N30m cash receipts

     

    A former Minister of Aviation Chief Femi Fani-Kayode Wednesday asked the Federal High Court in Lagos to decline territorial jurisdiction in his trial for alleged money laundering.

    He prayed Justice Rilwan Aikawa to transfer the case to the court’s Abuja division where the alleged offence was committed.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) re-arraigned Fani-Kayode and former finance minister (state) Senator Nenadi Usman for alleged N4.6billion fraud.

    They pleaded not guilty to the 17-count charge of money laundering.

    The defendants were first arraigned last June 28 before Justice Muslim Hassan, but the judge recused himself on March 16 after Fani-Kayode accused him of likely bias.

    Justice Hassan was head of legal department at EFCC before his appointment as a judge and had overseen a previous money laundering charge against Fani-Kayode.

    The judge returned the case file to the Chief Judge, Justice Ibrahim Auta, who re-assigned it to Justice Aikawa.

    Fani-Kayode’s lawyer Mr Norrison Quakers (SAN) said the court lacked the jurisdiction to try the former minister in Lagos.

    According to him, the facts of the case show that all the transactions which the former minister carried out as Director of Media and Publicity of the Goodluck Jonathan Campaign Organisation, for which he was charged, took place in Abuja.

    Besides, he said the defendant stays in Abuja and has another trial currently going in Abuja in another case.

    But, EFCC’s lawyer Rotimi Oyedepo urged the court to refuse the application as, according to him, the transaction instruments “were recovered in Lagos.”

    “The consequence of the alleged offence of money laundering is not limited to Abuja, but the entire federation. All the instruments of transaction were brought by Zenith Bank in Lagos.

    “The financial institutions used in the transactions have their head offices in Lagos,” Oyedepo said, adding that 13 of the prosecution’s 17 witnesses live in Lagos.

    Oyedepo said Fani-Kayode also raised the issue of transfer before Justice Hassan, yet when the file was returned to the Chief Judge, he re-assigned the case to another judge in Lagos rather than one in Abuja.

    He argued that the CJ had already exercised his discretion on where the case should be heard by re-assigning it to a judge in Lagos.

    Before the application for transfer was moved, Oyedepo had sought to tender receipts showing that Fani-Kayode made a cash payment of N30million to the first prosecution witness, a media consultant, Adewumi Idowu.

    The receipts acknowledge cash payments of N24million and N6million.

    “The documents were made by the witness. He identified them as the receipts he issued. They are extremely relevant to the facts in issue.

    “The receipts form the crux of counts 16 and 17 of the charge. We seek to tender the documents,” Oyedepo said.

    But, Quakers objected on the basis that the documents were not the original copies.

    He said the prosecution did not satisfy the requirements of Section 88 (c) of the Evidence Act which requires that there must be evidence of a thorough search for an original document before a duplicate can be accepted.

    Justice Aikawa adjourned till September 26 and 27 for ruling and continuation of trial.

     

  • How Badeh bought N240m house for his son – EFCC

    How Badeh bought N240m house for his son – EFCC

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) disclosed Tuesday how it found a house in Abuja bought at N240million Abuja house and furnished with N134million for his son, Alex Badeh junior.

    An operative of the EFCC, Abubakar Madaki, told a Federal High Court in Abuja Tuesday that he was the head of a task force that investigated a report from the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) in 2015, which formed the basis of the 10 count-charge of money laundering filed against Badeh and a company, Iyalikam Nigeria Limited.

    Madaki, who testified Tuesday as the 19th prosecution witness in the trial of Badeh and his firm, said Badeh’s  Bank Verification Number (BVN) linked the former Chief of Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal to the purchase of the house.

    Led in evidence by lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), Madaki said Badeh bought the house located  at 19, Ogun River Crescent, Abuja for his son, Alex Badeh (Jnr) in 2013.

    The witness said the house was paid for in cash with dollar equivalent of N240m and that the property was furnished with N80m and air conditioning system was installed in the house with N12m.

    He added that N42m was spent on installation of camera view and swimming pool in the house, and that the N134m spent on installing the facilities and furniture in the house was  paid directly from the account of the Nigerian Air Force.

    Madaki said the house at 19; Ogun River Crescent, Abuja was one of the numerous properties linked to Badeh.

    He said a tenancy agreement between Badeh’s son and a firm – Platinum Universal Construction Company (PUCC) – was drafted to conceal Alex Badeh (Jnr)’s true ownership of the house.

    The witness stated that when Badeh’s son (for who the house was bought) was invited by the EFCC, he initially claimed to be a tenant in the house, and that he rented it from PUCC.

    Madaki said, “For 19, Kumasi Crescent, Abuja, the occupant happened to be the son of the first defendant (Badeh) and his name is Alex Badeh Jnr.

    “He was not at home but was request to report at the EFCC office by the next day.

    “The next day, he reported and explained that he was renting the house from Platinum Universal Construction Company and that his rent was due to expire in 2014.

    “Because of the claim, I instructed some officers to follow him and conduct a search of the house.

    “After the search, they came back and he was released and asked to return in two days. But he said he was scheduled to fly a private plane as a pilot and would be unable to come that day.

    “He came back the next day but we told him we were still making enquiries and that whenever we were ready we would notify him.

    “Based on the name given to us by him as his landlord, we tried to conduct a search through BVN.

    “Having verified it, we discovered that the company had an account with Zenith Bank and another with GT Bank.

    “We requested the account documentation. We discovered that the Nigerian Air Force had had paid N92m into the company’s Zenith Bank account and N42m in two installments – N18m and, N24m. Altogether N42m was paid into the GTB account.

    “We now invited the owner of the company, Kabiru Salau.When he came; he came with a tenancy agreement between Alex Badeh (Jnr) and the company claiming that Alex Badeh Jnr rented the apartment from his company.

    “We inquired to know if he had any contract with the Nigerian Air Force and he said ‘yes it was long time ago’ when he was paid N356m for the renovation of the Nigerian Air Force Guest House.

    “And he said he had not done any other contract with the Nigerian Air Force and was still insisting that he rented the apartment to Alex Badeh Jnr.

    “He was then served with the company’s statements of account. Having gone through the statements of account, he started sweating.

    “After some time, he said he would say the truth. He explained that actually, it was not true that Alex Badeh rented the apartment.

    “He said sometimes in 2013, a friend of his introduced the property No 9, Kumasi Street to him, that he intended to sell it.

    “And coincidentally, Salisu Yishau (the first prosecution witness in the trial – PW1) who gave him the job of renovating the Nigerian Air Force Guest House contacted him that he should get a befitting apartment for the son of the Air Chief of Staff, the first defendant, was asked to go and negotiate.

    “He negotiated with the owner of the property fromN300m to N260m. He contacted Salisu Yishau and the fund was made available in dollar equivalent.

    “Having paid the fund, he requested the name to be used for the document. He contacted  who said he was going to speak with the first defendant.

    “After sometime, PW1 got back to him, and said he should use the name of his company, Platinum Universal Construction Company (PUCC) to purchase the property.

    “It was after the agreement that Alex Badeh Jnr met him through PW1 to take possession of the property.”

    The witness added that when Alex Badeh Jnr inspected the house, he requested for a company that could furnish the house, shortly after N92m was transferred from the Nigerian Air Force’s account to PUCC’s account for that purpose.

    Madaki added that: “Few hours later the company, Platinum Universal Construction Company received an alert of N92m from NAF.

    “He called Alex Badeh to confirm if the money was from him because it was paid through the account of the Nigerian Air Force and he answered in the affirmative.”

    Madaki stated that out of the N92m, N80m was transferred to the account of a Lagos company which did the furnishing job and the balance of N12m was spent on the installation of air conditioning system.

    The witness said another N80m was received from NAF’s account for installation of camera view and swimming pool.

    Madaki said: “The sum of N12m was used for the purchase of air conditioners which were installed in the house.

    “Having furnished the house, he was about handing over the key to Alex Badeh Jnr when Alex Badeh Jnr told him that he needed a camera view and swimming pool in the house.

    “Not quite long a total of N42m hit his GTB account from the NAF account making a total of N134m.

    “When he was handing over the property Alex Badeh told him to write a tenancy agreement between Platinum Universal Construction Company as the landlord and Alex Badeh Jnr as the tenant.

    “He then handed over the key to Bdeh. Before he drew the tenancy agreement, Alex Badeh Jnr requested the original certificate of occupancy to him – Certificates of Occupancy.”

    Badeh and his company, Iyalikam Nigeria Limited are standing trial on a 10-count charge of money laundering, in which they are accused of  fraudulent diversion of N3.9bn belonging to the Nigerian Air Force.

    They were said to have used the money to buy landed assets in choice areas of Abuja and Badeh’s home state, Adamawa State.

    The trial resumes Wednesday.

     

  • Updated: $115m ‘Diezani bribe’: Court frees lawmaker as ex-minister wife surrenders to EFCC

    Updated: $115m ‘Diezani bribe’: Court frees lawmaker as ex-minister wife surrenders to EFCC

    An Igbosere Chief Magistrates’ Court in Lagos Tuesday freed a federal lawmaker, Aliyu Ahman Pategi, who was remanded last Friday for failing to produce his ex-minister wife, Oloye Jumoke Akinjide, who he stood surety for.

    Chief Magistrate Afolashade Botoku struck out the charge against Pategi following Akinjide’s surrender Tuesday afternoon to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) at its Lagos office in Ikoyi.

    Pategi is the House of Representatives member representing Edu/Moro/Patigi Federal Constitutency of Kwara State.

    Akinjide, a former Federal Capital Territory and Minister of State for Defence, was declared wanted by the EFCC for alleged conspiracy and laundering of N650 million.

    The agency said she collected the sum from former Minister of Petroleum Resources Diezani Alison-Madueke in March 2015, as part of the $115million allegedly illegally disbursed by the former President Goodluck Jonathan administration to prosecute the 2015 general elections.

    According to a 16-paragraph affidavit filed by the commission, Diezani received the money as gratification from some oil marketers.

    EFCC counsel Rotimi Oyedepo told the court that Akinjide was granted bail by the agency last August 10, after Pategi stood as her surety on a N650 million bail bond.

    Pategi, Oyedepo said, promised to produce Akinjide whenever she was needed.

    He said a 24-count charge of money laundering and conspiracy was brought against her before Justice Ayo Emmanuel of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, in Suit No. FHC/IB/26C/2017.

    Akinjide, Oyedepo added, failed to turn up in court after more than three proceedings, despite the service of the charge on her prompting the Federal High Court to threaten to dismiss the charge.

    He said Akinjide was not seen since then and Pategi, despite repeated demands, failed to produce her

    He brought an application that Pategi should show cause why the N650m should not be forfeited to the Federal Government.

    Pategi was then remanded in EFCC custody.

    When the case came up yesterday, Oyedepo said Akinjide had reported herself to the EFCC’s office.

    “I just confirmed from the EFCC zonal office that Akinjide has turned herself in to EFCC custody.

    “Since it was the inability of Pategi to produce Akinjide that triggered our application, we apply that this suit be struck out in view of the success of producing Akinjide.

    “In the interest of justice I seek to withdraw this suit,” Oyedepo said.

    Earlier, defence counsel Olusegun Williams told the court that although the business of the day was for the defendant’s bail and preliminary objection to be heard, an arrangement out of court settlement talks were on going.

    He, thereafter, withdrew his applications and urged the court to suspend the suit until a settlement was reached.

    In a bench ruling, Magistrate Botoku struck out the suit.

    She said: “Based on the application of the prosecutor, the suit is hereby struck out and the defendant released.”

  • BPE to directors: Violate code, face EFCC, ICPC

    BPE to directors: Violate code, face EFCC, ICPC

    • Institutes code of ethics for alternate directors

    The Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) is placing investigation, sanction, sack and wrath of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Crimes Commission (ICPC) ahead of its directors.

    A highly place reliable source at the Presidency, who made this disclosure to The Nation in Abuja on Wednesday, added that the sanctions are part of the measures to tackle corruption in the Code of Ethics that the new Director General of the Bureau, Mr Alex Okoh has instituted.

    Enforcement and compliance with the code of ethics by directors and alternate directors shall be part of the monitoring mandate of the Anti-Corruption and Transparency Unit (ACTU) that the ICPC will inaugurate on Friday.

    According to the source, “the BPE has instituted a code of ethics for directors and alternate directors representing BPE on boards of privatised enterprises on behalf Federal Government of Nigeria.”

    It was however learnt that the code of ethics applies to the director sitting on the board of privatised enterprises in which the federal government has equity or interest and any such person that may be nominated to act as alternate director of the directors’ behalf.

    A document that The Nation stumbled on in Abuja said that “in the event that the director/alternate directors violate the terms of this code of ethics, the bureau shall impose appropriate disciplinary measures of impropriety as contained in S.14 of the BPE staff manual.

    This would be without prejudice to the penalties imposed under the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000; Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Act, 2004; and any other relevant laws.

    “In addition to sanctioning regime contained in Clause 14 of the BPE Staff Manual, the Director shall withdraw the nomination of  Alternate Director found culpable of violating this Code of Ethics.”

    The Director General had on assumption of office on April 21 said that his administration would also work to sustain the positive image of the Bureau while at the same time strive to change the negative perception held by some people about the BPE in the execution of its mandate.

    He promised to step up the post-privatization monitoring activities of the Bureau to ensure that owners of privatised enterprises live up to the covenants they signed with the Bureau so that Nigerians could derive maximum benefits from the privatised enterprises.

    The code of ethics for director/alternate directors that he has now instituted is that they (directors) “Report to the Bureau any concerns about unethical behaviour, actual or suspected fraud or violation of the Enterprise’s Code of Conduct Policy.

    “Act within his authority to protect the legitimate interest of the Enterprise, the FGN, Shareholders and its Employees.

    Where he has concerns about the running of the Enterprise or a proposed action, ensure that these are addressed by the Board and to the extent that they are not resolved, insist that the concerns are recorded in the minutes of the Board meeting.

    “Refrain from intruding in administrative issues that are the responsibility of the management of the Enterprise, except to monitor the results and ensure that procedures are consistent with Board Policy.

    “The Director/Alternate Directors shall ensure that their interaction with other Board members and representatives of the company before a Board meeting or a Board function are above board with no real or perceived indication of compromise on his part.

    ” The Director/Alternate Directors shall ensure that decisions on aspects that are provided for in the acquisition documents with the Bureau must be adhered to. Where there is the insistence of going against enshrined provisions in divestiture Agreements, the Director/Alternate Directors must insist on being recorded as disagreeing with the decision.

    The Director/Alternate Directors shall develop the ability to listen well, courage to speak up, patience and capability to ask the tough, probing but tactful questions in a way that doesn’t alienate others and that is helpful, not embarrassing, to the management of the Enterprise.

    “The Director/Alternate Directors shall ensure that critical matters that have come before the Board for consideration have first been filtered and considered by the relevant Sub-Committees.

    “The Director/Alternate Directors shall undertake the diligent analysis of all proposals placed before the Board and act with the level of skill expected from Directors.

    “The Director/Alternate Directors shall carry out their fiduciary obligations responsibly, that is, to take appropriate measures to ensure that the Board uses the Enterprises resources efficiently, economically and effectively, avoiding waste and extravagance; and

    “Attend the interaction forum for Board Members within the Bureau as a peer review tool and also a learning curve for future improvement.”

    It was, however, learnt that the tenure of an Alternate Director so designated by the Director shall be one year, subject to renewal for a maximum of one more year, at the discretion of the Director-General.

  • Trial: N750,000 not bribe, but ‘assistance’ to judge – Nwobike

    Trial: N750,000 not bribe, but ‘assistance’ to judge – Nwobike

    Dr Joseph Nwobike, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria on Wednesday told an Ikeja High Court that the N750,000 he gave to Justice Mohammed Yinusa of the Federal High Court was not a bribe but to assist him in settling his mother’s medical bills.

    Nwobike said this while testifying in a corruption trial by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The EFCC had filed an 11-count charge against Nwobike for allegedly perverting the course of justice and offering gratification to public officials.

    The anti-graft agency alleged that Nwobike offered gratification to some judges of the Federal High Court and National Industrial Court in a bid to influence them to act contrary to their official capacities.

    The EFCC also claimed that Nwobike engaged in illegal text messages with four registrars of the Federal High Court in a bid to unduly influence cases he was handling before the judges.

    Nwobike, however, denied all the charges.

    Nwobike, led by his counsel Mr Olawale Akoni (SAN), said he became a legal practitioner and an arbitrator on Dec. 16, 1992.

    “I am a SAN, who was sworn in 2010 for the 2009 set; since I was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1992, I have been in uninterrupted legal practice in Lagos and all over the country.

    “My primary duty as a legal practitioner is to respect the court in conduct either in physical appearances or my processes
    before the court.

    “Since I was called to the Nigerian Bar, I have never been a respondent to any form of complaint or been a party to any disciplinary proceeding before anybody constituted for that purpose,” he told the court.

    Explaining to the court how he was confronted by the EFCC and the reasons for giving the judge N750,000, Nwobike said: “I recollect that I did a few cases against the EFCC.

    “On a particular day, I came back from court and received a phone call from a fellow who described himself an official of the EFCC.

    “He introduced himself as Mr Zakari and I recollected that in the past, I had cross-examined him in a case involving my client and the EFCC.

    “He (Zakari) said I should come to his office to clarify an issue. I went to the EFCC thinking that the issue has to do with my client and the EFCC.

    “Thirty minutes after I arrived at the EFCC office and met him, he showed me a document which I found out was a UBA statement of account of Nwobike and Co.

    “He showed me an entry where there was a transfer of the sum of N750,000 from the account of Joseph Nwobike and Co. to the bank account of Justice Mohammed Yinusa.

    “Zakari requested that I put in writing the reasons for that transfer.

    “In my statement, I said I knew Justice Yinusa for quite a long time back when he was a counsel at the Federal Ministry of Justice and we became friends as lawyers.

    “On one occasion, I saw him by chance and he told me that his mother was ill and was undergoing dialysis and he feared that she will die soon and N250,000 was spent daily on her treatment,” he said.

    Nwobike added:“I pitied him not as a judge but because he had been my friend for over 19 years. I told him that I had no money on me but I will send money when I had some money.

    “He gave me his account details and we parted.

    “When I had some money, in my own signature, I transferred N750,000 only for that purpose.

    “I saw him again by chance and he told me that his mother was getting better but I later found out that she died because she could not continue with the dialysis.”

    Nwobike denied giving any other sum apart from the N750,000 he gave to Justice Yinusa and denied discussing any of the cases he was handling before the judge with Yinusa.

    “As in practice, I do not discuss cases with judges or persons in authority. I do not discuss matters before, during and after they are heard.

    “The money I gave the judge was not to make him refrain from acting in his official capacity.”

    Justice Raliatu Adebiyi adjourned the case until July 3 for continuation of trial.

  • EFCC charges judge with unlawful enrichment 

    EFCC charges judge with unlawful enrichment 

    …Commission kicks as Justice Nganjiwa fails to appear for arraignment

     

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Tuesday brought a charge of unlawful enrichment to the tune of $260,000 and N8, 650,000 against Justice Hyeladzira Ajiya Nganjiwa of the Federal High Court, Bayelsa Division.

    The EFCC filed the 14-count charge before Justice Adedayo Akintoye of the Lagos High Court in Igbosere.

    But Justice Nganjiwa, who filed a preliminary objection challenging the court’s jurisdiction to hear the charge, was not available for arraignment.

    His lawyer, Robert Clarke (SAN), said the judge failed to catch a flight from Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital.

    According to the charge seen by The Nation, Justice Nganjiwa allegedly unlawfully received the N81, 705,000 in naira and United States dollars.

    The money was allegedly received in the judge’s Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB) account in tranches of $144,000, $102,000, $10,000 and $4,000 (amounting to $260,000).

    He also allegedly received through his Access Bank corporate account in the name of Awa-Ajia Nigeria Ltd, the sums of N750,000, N300,000, N5,000,000, N5000,000, N500,000, N500,000, N500,000, N100,000 and N500,000 (totalling N8,650,000).

    Justice Adedayo adjourned till June 23 for ruling on the objection.

    Details later…

     

  • Budget padding allegations: EFCC invites Jibrin 

    Budget padding allegations: EFCC invites Jibrin 

    The suspended former Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriation, Rep. Abdulmumin Jibrin, has been invited by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Jibrin’s invitation is based on his allegations on budget padding against the leadership of the House and to answer questions concerning money looted through padding in the 2016 budget.

    The EFCC’s letter of invitation to Jibrin dated June 9 was signed by the acting Head of Extractive Industry Grid Section, Mr Michael Wetkas.

    It said: “The commission has commenced investigation into the petition of corrupt practices and abuses of office reported on 1st August, 2016, by Hammart and Co. (Tafida Chambers) on your behalf against Hon. Yakubu Dogara, Hon. Yussuf Lasun, Hon. Alhassan Doguwa, Hon. Leonard Ogor and others.

    “In furtherance of the investigation and due to unfolding findings, it has become imperative to request that you attend another interview with the team.

    “Through Ibrahim Ahmed on 13th June 2017 at the 3rd floor Block A, No.5 Fomelu street, off Adetokumbo Ademola Crescent, Wuse 2, Abuja, at 10 a.m. to clarify some issues to enable us conclude investigation”.

    Jibrin in a statement on Monday in Abuja confirmed receipt of the letter.

    He said: “Today, I received invitation from the EFCC for another interview to clarify some issues to enable the commission conclude investigation on my petition against some principal officers of the House on 2016 budget fraud, corruption and abuse of office.

    “This is a welcome development as it is coming at a time that many Nigerians have lost hope that the outcome of my petition will not see the light of the day.

    “I have severally maintained that I have full confidence in the EFCC under the Chairmanship of Ibrahim Magu.

    “I am also aware that the EFCC have been investigating the petition I submitted and far reaching discoveries were made.

    “It is also noteworthy that this invitation is coming at a time that some revelations were made last week.

    “The revelations with details of how the Minority Leader of the House, Leo Ogor, used his company where he is the signatory to the accounts to execute constituency project contracts completely against the laws of our land.

    “It is however worrisome that in his response, Ogor admitted the offence and even boosted that there is nothing wrong in what he did as quoted by the nation’s newspaper.

    “Let me state emphatically clear that any Member or Senator who used his company or companies with links to him to execute constituency project contracts, whether such contracts are executed or not has committed an offence.

    “Either way you look at it, he can be prosecuted on charges of corruption or abuse of office.

    “The case of Leo Ogor is same or even worst than that of Babachir Lawal yet the entire National Assembly has maintained an embarrassing silence.

    “Is my boss, Senate President and Chairman of National Assembly, Sen. Bukola Saraki aware of this?

    “In due course I will expose a lot of other issues in the 2017 budget that will shock Nigerians whether the authority decides to act on it or not.”