Tag: Economy

  • ‘Development of domestic tourism ‘ll boost economy’

    ‘Development of domestic tourism ‘ll boost economy’

    For tourism to contribute meaningfully to the economic development of the nation, there is urgent need to expand the domestic market by creating linkages within Nigeria and the neighbouring countries, including East of Africa.

    The Chairman, Tourism Group of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Larry Segun-Lean, who made this remark, said tourism would also promote the cultural heritage by using destination, marketing plan and operation, as well as providing opportunity for investors and other stakeholders in the industry.

    “We have to create linkages, destinations in the country.All the hotels and restaurants at the moment work independent of one another, but we need to bring everybody together so that when a visitor comes whether from within or outside Nigeria, the person knows what to see, where to go and spend more time and thereby spending more money,” Segun-Lean said.

    He said it was the responsibility of the government to provide the amenities, including marketing orientation for cultural sites and monuments, as well as the promotion of cultural brands.

    Speaking with The Nation during the Pre-Centenary Celebration Lecture in Lagos, Segun-Lean challenged the government and other stakeholders to take full advantage of the use of the new technology in promoting cultural tourism by generating specific information that would give accurate description of cultural monuments, events, facilities, services and resources as obtainable in every part of the country.

    This, he said, would intensify awareness of how valuable cultural tourism is to the economy, believing it would promote understanding of cultural offer of a destination and meaning to the tourist, adding that cultural association and destination management organizations would value location, hospitality, attraction and distinction of the cultural sites.

    The theme of the lecture, which was “Promoting Cultural Tourism in Nigeria: The Past, Present and the Future”, is expected to critically analyse cultural tourism in Nigeria in the past one hundred years with a view to charting a new course for the industry in the future.

    Segu-Lean, who called for collaboration of leadership in the sub-sector, maintained that culture, if well harnessed, could change perception of a place and contribute meaningfully to the economic growth of the nation.

    The President of the chamber, Goddie Ibru, said government must put in strong measures to bring a lasting solution to the socio-economic and political problems in the country, including insecurity, inadequate infrastructure and harsh business environment to enhance tourism development.

    He further said transportation and technology are part of challenges that directly impact on the tourism industry which the government must address with urgent attention.

  • Economy stable in spite of security challenge, says Okonjo-Iweala

    Economy stable in spite of security challenge, says Okonjo-Iweala

    Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has assured Nigerians and the international community that the fundamentals of the economy remain strong in spite of the security challenges facing the country.

    She said: “The economy recorded a growth of 6.5 per cent in the first quarter of 2013, inflation is down to single digit, fiscal deficit is only 1.8 of GDP, foreign reserves stand at $48 billion and the government is working very hard on many projects that would impact positively on the populace.”

    A statement from Paul Nwabuikwu, Special Adviser to the Minister said she made the remark yesterday during an international forum organised by Standard Chartered Bank.

    Responding to questions on the implications of the state of emergency declared last week by President Goodluck Jonathan in Yobe, Borno and Adamawa States, the minister explained that the government is taking decisive action to secure communities in the Northeast affected by the activities of Boko Haram.

    She explained that the intention of the government is to restore security and order to enable economic activities and normal life resume. The state of emergency, she explained, gives security agents the latitude to flush out insurgents from their bases.

    Dr. Okonjo-Iweala noted that the Presidency is adopting a multi-dimensional approach which include political dialogue, counter-terrorism tools and economic inclusion to solve the problem.

    Government, she said, hope that the return of peace will create a strong foundation to spur economic growth, particularly through agriculture, the mainstay of the region.

    Responding to a question on whether the country is expecting a supplementary budget to tackle security challenges, the minister answered in the negative. She noted that a Contingency Vote was already built into the budget to take care of emergencies such as security and the flooding that affected many parts of the country last year.

     

     

     

     

  • Nigerian tax to GDP ratio of 7% not acceptable, says Okonjo-Iweala

    Nigerian tax to GDP ratio of 7% not acceptable, says Okonjo-Iweala

    The Coordinating Minister for Nigeria’s Economy, Dr Ngozi okonjo-Iweala says the nation’s tax to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio of 7 per cent of GDP Is not sufficient to build a strong economy.

    Okonjo-Iweala disclosed this during a presentation at the Spring meeting of the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Washington DC.

    The Minister spoke on the topic “Fiscal Policy, Equity and Long-Term Growth in Developing Countries”.at a forum of  the World Bank.

    “In my own country, Nigeria, tax to GDP ratio is an unacceptable 7 per cent of GDP as we depend mostly on government’s direct share of oil revenue.

    “This has to change,’’ she said.

    According to her, the fundamental observation is that for low-income countries, more resources need to be mobilised from domestic sources given the anticipated decline in Official Development Assistance (ODA).

    She noted that the IMF estimates that many low-income countries still have tax revenues which fall below the generally accepted threshold of 15 per cent of GDP.

    “For example, low-income countries in Africa are below the 15 per cent of GDP.

    “Overall, we know that a further increase in tax revenues of about 2-4 per cent of GDP is attainable in many low-income countries.

    “Interestingly, investing ODA in building strong tax systems in developing countries can yield excellent returns.

    “Some research by the OECD indicates that one dollar of ODA spent on building tax administration capacity results in another 350 dollars in increased tax revenues,’’ she added

    Okonjo-Iweala said that in developing countries, policy-makers must first take responsibility for reviewing how resource mobilisation in their economies would be improved.

    She said that a complete diagnostic had been carried out, with the help of McKinsey consult, to see how to improve compliance in the tax system.

    She noted that about 75 per cent of registered firms were not in the tax system.

    “When we looked more closely at our tax payers’ database, we discovered that about 65 per cent of registered tax payers had not filed their tax returns in the past two years.

    “The main culprits tend to be this intermediate group of medium-sized professional service providers, contractors, and landlords.

    “This non-compliant group fall in the grey area between the informal sector and large companies and I think, from an enforcement viewpoint, we can get a good `bang for the buck’ by focusing on this sector,’’ she said.

    Okonjo-Iweala said that the estimated tax leakages due to unpaid real estate rentals in Nigeria amounted to about 250 million dollars per annum. (NAN)

  • Jonathan, Zuma meet on security, economy

    Jonathan, Zuma meet on security, economy

    As the two top leaders in the continent, Nigeria’s President Goodluck Jonathan on Tuesday met with his South African counterpart, President Jacob Zuma to brainstorm of the many challenges facing the continent.

    Briefing State House correspondents at the Presidential Villa , President Zuma said that he was in Nigeria to consult on many issues concerning the African continent as a whole and the two countries on one hand.

     He said that the discussions between him and President Jonathan have been very fruitful towards repositioning the continent for good.
    Zuma said:“We are here to consult on matters related to the two countries and the African continent. As you know, very soon His Excellency the President will be visiting South Africa on a state visit and therefore, a lot of other issues that will necessarily be dealt with. We thought we needed to consult particularly the situation in the continent.”
    “We have had a very fruitful consultation and we believe that between Nigeria and South Africa, it is important to align and harmonize our thinking on matters that need the countries in the continent to take specific decisions.”
    “Some of the issues raised were issues of security of the continent as you know that there has been some difficulties in a number of the countries. We touched upon those issues and certainly take the issues further when we meet in South Africa.”“But you are also aware that Africa will also be celebrating 50 years of the OAU and African Union establishment in the continent. And the issue really is we need to say what is it that we can look at and look forward beyond that time. We have had a very fruitful discussion.” He added
  • Worsening oil theft’ll jeopardise economy, says ACN

    Worsening oil theft’ll jeopardise economy, says ACN

    The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) has warned that the rising cases of crude oil theft and pipeline vandalism in the Niger Delta will worsen the country’s economic woes, when placed side by side with other problems besetting the country’s troubled oil sector, unless the Federal Government acts decisively to stop the criminal act.

    In a statement issued in Lagos yesterday by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the party said oil theft and pipeline vandalism, the cost of which has been put between 6 and 12 billion US dollars per annum, have reverted to the pre-amnesty period, when oil theft peaked at about 350,000 barrels of per day – higher than the quantity of oil produced daily by Gabon or Equatorial Guinea.

    The statement reads: ‘’On February 24, 2013, we raised the alarm that the country’s economy was heading for the rocks, citing the skyrocketing cost of oil production, from 4 dollars per barrel in 2002 to 35 dollars per barrel presently; the massive corruption in the oil sector; the sharp fall in the discovery of new oil and gas reserves due to the low investment in the sector, and the challenge posed by alternative sources of global supply of oil and gas.

    ‘’For raising that alarm, we were pilloried by those who acted more out of emotion than facts. Today, we say the situation is actually worse than we had thought, exacerbated by pipeline vandalism and crude oil theft which have reached an unsustainable level. Add this to the resurgence of attacks by the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), and we are compelled to cry out again.’’

    ACN said the action taken in recent times by two major oil companies, Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) and Nigerian Agip Oil Company (NAOC), is the clearest indication yet of the seriousness of the situation.

    The party added: ‘’In March 2013, SPDC announced that it will shut down the 150,000bpd

    Nembe Creek oil pipeline this April due to the urgent need to clear away illegal connections meant to facilitate the theft of crude oil from the pipeline. Also in March, NAOC declared a force majeure regarding crude oil liftings at the Brass terminal and suspended its activities in Bayelsa State, following the intensification of illegal bunkering activities and the vandalisation of the 10’’ Kwale-Akri-Nembe-Brass oil delivery line.

    ‘’The shutdown of these two key oil delivery trunk lines by SPDC and

    NAOC has cut nearly 300,000 barrels per day from already dwindling Nigeria’s oil output, now put at 2.2 million barrels per day, down from 2.75 million barrels per day a year ago, resulting from increased, organised and sophisticated illegal bunkering of oil by criminals operating in the creeks of the Niger Delta.

    ‘’To worsen matters, it has been alleged that some bad eggs in the military Joint Task Force (JTF) deployed to the region to protect oil personnel and facilities have been accused of complicity in the illegal bunkering activities. This is why the Federal Government must quickly engage key stakeholders in a dialogue with a view to finding ways to stop the criminal act before it cripples the economy and brings Nigeria down to its knees.

    ‘’We are particularly concerned that the Nembe Creek axis seems to have been the worst hit by the criminal act, despite being the operating base of a key former militant who has cornered a lucrative Federal Government contract to protect Nigeria’s coastline from the same bunkering activities that are now getting out of control.”

    ACN said it is worrisome that the relative peace witnessed in the Niger Delta following the amnesty programme for oil militants seems to have waned, going by available statistics: A total of 350,000 barrels per day was lost to illegal bunkering in the Niger Delta in 2012, representing an increase of 45 per cent over the figure for 2011 and 67 per cent over that of 2010. It added that the trend for 2013 is alarming.

    It said without prejudice to whatever solutions that key stakeholders may proffer to the criminal act of pipeline vandalism and oil theft, it is important for the security agencies operating in the Niger Delta to safeguard lives and property in the Niger Delta; and the government must recommit itself to enhancing security of investment in the region, while at the same time tackling headlong the grinding poverty in the oil region.

  • ‘Use of foreign loss adjusters will kill economy’

    ‘Use of foreign loss adjusters will kill economy’

    Globally, the insurance industry thrives on a tripod – underwriters, brokers and loss adjusters. But in Nigeria, the reverse is the case. The Managing Director of Corporate Loss Adjusters Limited, Chief Lebi Omobayowa, who is also the President of the Institute of Loss Adjusters of Nigeria (ILAN), speaks with UYOTTA ESHIET on a wide range of issues affecting the industry.

     

    What is Insurance Loss Adjusting all about? What is its relevance to the industry and the economy at large?

    Basically, there are three major arms in the insurance industry, the underwriters, the brokers and the loss adjusters. The business is sourced by the broker and delivered to the underwriter as a business to accept the risk if it is acceptable and issue the policy, that is the insurance contract. If there is a claim, the underwriter calls on the adjuster who is a professional in the area to carry out necessary investigations, verifications and claims adjustment. He advises finally on the liability attached to the policy.

    How important is loss adjusting in the industry?

    Insurance is like a triangle or tripod, it stands on three legs; the underwriter is a leg, the broker is the second leg and the adjuster is the third leg. The three legs must be present for the tripod to stand. If the adjuster is not there, the insurance industry is not complete. They add value by assessing claims professionally. They stand between the insured and the insurer as an independent arbiter. They hold the scale of justice with equal pulse between the insured and the insurer; interpret the policy conditions and terms stated therein and advise if claims are admissible or not. If admissible, what is the quantum of claims to the insured? We also advise on risk improvement measures.

    What is the importance of adjusters to the economy?

    If a claim is not properly adjusted, excess could be paid to the claimant or the quantum could be paid to someone who is not supposed to be paid. These are funds that are supposed to be channelled to some other areas that can help the economy. The adjuster can also help the nation to reduce losses associated with perils such as fire. If things are done properly in the country and professional advice is sought and taken based on the advice of adjusters, losses and other destruction could be eliminated and the huge amount usually appropriated for replacement or repairs of such damaged assets could be channelled to other areas for national development. If certain things that are supposed to be done are left undone, it can result to fire and fire is national waste.

    What are the challenges of loss adjusting?

    Despite the local content concept and laws, we are aware that some of the underwriters still allow foreign loss adjusters to come into Nigeria, do the business without the knowledge of the local loss adjusters and without taking the local loss adjusters along. This is against the law of local contempt. It is advisable that underwriters in the country should heed the law by ensuring that whenever there is a big claim that will warrant the presence of an international or oversea loss adjuster as may be demanded by the re-insurers, they should let the re-insurers know that there is a law in Nigeria that says if any foreign loss adjuster is to be invited, they must work with a resident loss adjuster. The law must be allowed to apply as it is done in other countries. This is a message to the insurance underwriters in the country that some claims managers in insurance companies do not care whether the local adjusters are involved or not. By this action they are killing the economy slowly. They are not growing the economy. They are not growing technology. They are not growing professionalism and are not allowing the local adjusters to acquire international exposure and experience that the local content is seeking to establish. All other countries do it and they are making it.

    Doesn’t the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) have authority over the issue?

    NAICOM has authority over insurance companies but is it not only when NAICOM is aware that they can take corrective action aimed at correcting the situation? When a claim occurs and overseas adjusters come in, NAICOM will not know and the invited adjuster would have finished his assignment and run back to his country only to be paid there through capital flight because they will be paid in foreign currency. If we do the right things and Managing Directors of insurance companies have control over their claims managers, the right thing should be done to make sure that if there is the need at all for a loss adjuster to come from abroad in compliance with the directive of their re-insurers, the underwriting companies, through the claims managers should let them know that in as much as they are not objecting to the coming of foreign loss adjusters, there is an existing law in Nigeria, which says if a foreign loss adjuster comes here, they must work with a local adjuster so that the local adjuster can get his share of the professional fees and also gain international exposure and experience so that eventually Nigeria will grow like other countries.

    Is there no mechanism within the Institute of Loss Adjusting of Nigeria (ILAN) for monitoring the situation and reporting to NAICOM?

    If a claim occurs and a local loss adjuster is not called upon by the underwriting company, he may not know when or who has been appointed. There are certain claims that may be handled internally by insurance companies. So, it is not all claims that are known by ILAN members. If a loss occurs and the insurance company and the re-insurers agree to appoint an international loss adjuster, it is the underwriter here in Nigeria that should tell the re-insurer that according to our local laws, the invited foreign loss adjuster must work with our local loss adjuster. It is our own people here that must tell both the re-insurer and the invited loss adjuster that there is a law which they must obey.

    ILAN is trying to set up a mechanism whereby if any foreign loss adjuster comes into Nigeria to do business without respecting the law of the country, when such a person is caught, he faces the law. It is necessary for them to know this though quite a number of them are aware, but because our local underwriters usually don’t draw their attention to it.

    But the foreign loss adjusters cannot just come in on their own without being invited

    The underwriter will appoint an adjuster and in complex cases, the re-insurer may want an international loss adjuster to also be involved, working along with the local adjusters. Our own underwriters here are those that are suppose to tell the adjusters who are appointed through the re-insurer that you cannot work alone in Nigeria because the law does not allow that; you must work with local adjusters probably an Associate, presenting to them the list of registered local adjusters for them to select from if they do not have one already. Our websites are there and our individual members also the websites where the foreign adjusters can interact with, interview and select whoever they chose as their partner here.

    To save the industry from collapse, NAICOM introduced the ‘No Premium, No Cover’ at the beginning of this year. Why can’t the regulator also ensure that loss adjusting is not driven into extinction?

    NAICOM should also reflect this in their regulations by publishing a reminder that no underwriting company should appoint or allow a foreign adjuster to handle a claim in Nigeria 100 per cent without the involvement of at least one local adjuster. NAICOM should put this into their regulation. They should protect the interest of the local adjusters. After all, we pay our normal charges to the government. The regulator should protect our interest. If NAICOM put this into their regulation, it will serve as a reminder to the insurers.

    What are the other challenges facing loss adjusting in Nigeria?

    There are about 45 functional registered local loss adjusting companies in Nigeria. It was more than that, but that is the number we have now. Others have closed due to poor remuneration. It is the only profession where the service provider has no authority to fix its own price but only rely on the consumer to do this. Some companies are dead because they did not have sufficient funds to run and to employ fresh graduates, train and to retain qualified loss adjusters. Over the years, ILAN, through her past successive governing Councils, has been asking the Nigeria Insurers Association (NIA) for an upward review of the old adjusters’ scale of fees which has been in use since 1992 without any review despite inflations and other economic vagaries that have rendered the scale palpably unrealistic, inefficient and potentially averse to the sustenance of professional adjusting practice in the country and the technical growth and development of the Nigerian insurance industry, and by extension, the national economy. Without sounding an alarmist, I am of the candid opinion that care must be taken to avoid a re-occurrence of capital flight if the local loss adjusting practice is forced into oblivion by frustration and thus give way to an influx of foreign adjusters who must be paid in foreign currencies that will automatically deplete our national foreign reserve.

    We have complained variously in the past, but right now, I am adopting a new approach involving dialogue. We have agreed with NIA that there is need to have a review to encourage adjusters to earn a reasonable remuneration that can keep the loss adjusting profession in Nigeria in existence as it is in the developed or even developing economies. There is going to be a positive response this year. We are seeking audience with them and the new Council of NIA appear to be ready to go into discussion with us in the interest of the industry as a whole. The industry stands on three legs, the three legs must be there and function effectively before the industry itself can function effectively. NAICOM is not involved in fixing our fees but nothing is wrong if they get involved for the overall good of the industry.

    Insurance penetration in other countries is said to thrive on enforcement. What is the situation in Nigeria?

    Government has actually enforced a number of insurance products in the country, including the latest one on buildings under construction and the public buildings. I am happy that the government is trying to do that and I am equally happy that NAICOM is equally working hard on that. It now depends on insurance companies to go all out and ensure that it sanitises the insuring public to comply. They should also be in a position to monitor to ensure all buildings under construction, and all other public buildings are insured. Government should not be dependent on to do all things, we all must play our part. Insurance companies should set up machinery to find out buildings under construction without the appropriate insurance, buildings classified as public buildings fall within the purview of the law without appropriate insurance covers and make a report to the National Insurance Commission to take appropriate action.

    After 70 years of existence, insurance still contributes less than 10 per cent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Why is this so?

    What is the level of education? Education is an important factor in this regard. The Industry is trying hard to create the necessary insurance awareness among Nigerians. Insurance awareness is still very low and too poor, that is why insurance cannot contribute much to the economy. In developed nations that understand the benefits of insurance, insurers are the owners of banks because the little insurance premiums become huge to do business with if there is proper management of it, if there is no undercutting of premium rates by unscrupulous underwriters and such other factors. It is where that sanity exists that you can see insurers owing banks, not banks owing insurance companies as is the case in Nigeria. We will get there if we do things straight, correctly and reduce drastically the level of corruption in the country.

    Why are we still having issues with claims settlement?

    Those complaining may be right and wrong. There are some genuine claims that underwriters may turn down for some reasons but as an adjuster, I have not witnessed a claim that I have adjusted that an underwriter will turn down. Some claims are handled in-house by some underwriters. The complaints could be from those ones handled in-house by the underwriters.

    Following last year’s floods in some parts of the country, the Federal Government budgeted N17 billion as compensation, states and other bodies too have been announcing various amounts as compensation to the victims. As a risk and claims expert, is this proper ?

    This is a misnomer. Even if these people were not aware of need for insurance, why given them the compensation in the first place, the government should have used that opportunity to tell them about insurance and warn them to take to insurance against future occurrence and get them to embrace it, but that was not done. At any rate our level of education in Nigeria is also militating against appreciation of insurance. Again, because of the high level of corruption, people are always looking for ways to line their pockets with the nation’s money.

    Where do you see the NAICOM’s new policy on payment before insurance cover is granted taking the industry to this year?

    It is a welcome development, a positive one too. Initially, it may be difficult. There is no good thing that starts from a smooth level. There is light at the end of the tunnel if we keep doing the right thing, if we do the business the way it is supposed to be done. In the next two to three years there will be very positive results through adherence to the law because the insuring public will become fully aware that you must pay premium before you can be granted insurance cover. Those that were used to getting cover on credit in the past, to them it will be difficult now but they will adjust.

  • How firms grow the economy

    Over the years, brands and their parent companies

    have succeeded in building the economy of their countries and foreign hosts.

    This is possible because of the profits the brands make, employment opportunities they generate for citizens and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), including provision of electricity, roads, pipe-borne water and manufacturing plants.

    Such is the value they add to natural economy that the companies are really supported by the host countries in period of economic adversity.

    Between 1998 and 2007, Nokia contributed a quarter of Finnish growth rate and in the early part of the 21st century it employed more than 24,000 people. In a country where only natural resources are its vast forests, Nokia succeeded in putting Finland on the world map. It is the first phone manufacturer to own a care centre in Nigeria.

    The company also partnered with the Lagos State government to implement the house-numbering project.

    That is why Nokia users have access to a detailed offline map of Lagos State. They connect with their consumers, sell more with the new improved application that provides detailed offline map. Yet, Nokia has no manufacturing or even assembly plant in Nigeria.

    Among many Chinese companies, Huawei has distinguished itself as a telecommunications’ equipment manufacturer. Today, it is the largest telecoms equipment manufacturer.

    In 2010, the company announced a net profit of over $3 billion. In addition, Huawei runs a training facility in Abuja, where people are being trained. This facility is the first of its kind in West Africa.

    Samsung Group, which has about 80 subsidiaries with Samsung Electronics as its main firm, is responsible for 20 per cent of South Korea’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Samsung has a care centre in Nigeria for the servicing, repair and maintenance of its products. In partnership with the Lagos State government, the company also owns a Technical School in Ikeja, Lagos.

    After training, however, beneficiaries still have to go hunting for jobs. In effect, its impact on alleviating unemployment in the country is minimal. If Samsung had a manufacturing plant, the students would have qualified to work there since they already have the technical-knowhow.

    For instance, Nestlé—the consumer-goods company—contributed 15 per cent of Switzerland’s GDP in 2012. It has a vibrant Nigerian subsidiary with a functional manufacturing plant that employs many Nigerians. It has just opened a multi-billion centre in Agbara, Ogun State.

    Guinness storehouse, the home of Guinness, welcomed over one million visitors last year and served as Ireland’s major international major tourist attraction.

    Guinness Nigeria owns a manufacturing plant in the country and undertakes many CSR projects in the community.

    Coca-Cola has over 90,000 employees across more than 200 countries; it contributes immensely to the economy through the employment of many people and execution of projects spread across communities.

    With Toyota as its spearhead, Japan’s automobile industry contributed 10.5 per cent growth to that country’s economy in 2009. It has more than 300,000 employees with the majority being Japanese. Toyota has no manufacturing or assembling plant in Nigeria, yet it is the top selling automobile in the country. Same goes for Germany’s Mercedes Benz.

    Every year, Nigeria churns out graduates in their thousands from different universities with no assurance of employment. Yet, different foreign brands have turned the country into a cash cow.

    It is projected that the sales of smartphones in Nigeria would hit N900 billion by 2015, yet unemployment is at its all-time high, crime in increasing and government is complacent in tackling the malaise.

    These companies have defended their corporate actions. They are shortage of electricity as a crippling factor. The cumulative effect of the staggering cost of generating power in Nigeria is a substantial increase in the cost of production, which means that the goods produced are more expensive than expected.

    Setting up manufacturing and assembly plants should serve to help cut costs for manufacturers since it would mean a reduction in overhead costs such as transportation.

    But when weighed against the astronomical cost of generating power in Nigeria, locating plants outside the country seems a more logical and cost effective choice. The recent spate of insecurity in the country, has served as a further encumbrance as far as this goal is concerned. Would Nigeria continue to be a dump site for these brands? Who is to blame for this misfortune – the government or the companies?

    A Professor of Economics, Makinwa Olusegun, said: “A nation that would grow must first of all grow its manufacturing sector, encourage foreign investors to build their manufacturing plants in the country. Countries such as India grew like that. If we continue to be consumers and not producers, we would end up being stagnant and may not be able to cope with the level of unemployment that would hit the country in another 10 years.

    “The government should first of all create an enabling environment for local brands to grow, and also for foreign brands and investors; make importation almost impossible and make foreign companies see the cost effectiveness of stabling their either manufacturing or assembly plant in the country.

    “For example, many companies are running to Ghana to produce and then come to Nigeria to sell. They sell 90 per cent of what they produce in Ghana here, that fact is quite unnerving. This would surely continue if it does not get worse if the government doesn’t do anything about it on time to salvage the crisis,” he said.

     

  • How Africa can develop its economy, by Sanusi

    How Africa can develop its economy, by Sanusi

    For the economies of Africa to transform from being import-dependent to industrialised, the continent must put in place infrastructure, Afro-centric policies and develop both technical and vocational skills, the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, has said.

    He identified these factors in a speech he wrote for the Financial Times of London entitled: Development or de-industrialisation? A new look at Chinese engagement with Africa.

    The CBN chief lamented that the continent has become a dumping ground for Chinese manufactured exports. He argued that a country, such as Nigeria with huge domestic market, but with factories largely shut, ought to refine her crude oil, build petrochemical plants and use gas for power generation and other gas-based industries such as fertiliser plants.

    “For Africa to finally realise its economic potential and … succeed, we need four things:First, we need to build first class infrastructure (electricity, telecommunications, transportation).

    “Second, the infrastructure so built should service a vision of Afro-centric economic policies. African nations will not develop by selling commodities to Europe, America and China. We may not compete immediately with the Asian tigers in selling manufactured goods to Europe. But in the short-term, with the right infrastructure, the huge African market is there.

    “Third, we must see China for what it is; a competitor who must be “taken out.” Africa must look at trade at trade practices, the impact of export incentives and subsidies and a weak currency, on Chinese exports to Africa. We must not only produce locally those goods in which we can build comparative advantage, but actively fight off Chinese imports promoted by predatory policies.

    “Finally, while African labour may be cheaper than Chinese labour, productivity remains very low. Investment in technical and vocational education are critical (elements too),” the apex bank chief said.

    According to him, these changes will transform the relationship between Africa and China.

    He added that the continent must recognise that China is not in Africa to promote African interests, arguing that, such as Americans, Russians, French, Brazilians and others, the interest of their countries is first while that of others follows.

    “The romance (with China) needs to be replaced by hard-nosed economic thinking. Engagement must be on terms that allow the Chinese to make money while benefiting African development-such as incentives to set up manufacturing on African soil and policies to ensure employment of Africans and skills transfers as well as encouraging equity participation by locals,” Sanusi advocated.

     

  • How firms grow the economy

    Over the years, brands and their parent companies

    have succeeded in building the economy of their countries and foreign hosts.

    This is possible because of the profits the brands make, employment opportunities they generate for citizens and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), including provision of electricity, roads, pipe-borne water and manufacturing plants.

    Such is the value they add to natural economy that the companies are really supported by the host countries in period of economic adversity.

    Between 1998 and 2007, Nokia contributed a quarter of Finnish growth rate and in the early part of the 21st century it employed more than 24,000 people. In a country where only natural resources are its vast forests, Nokia succeeded in putting Finland on the world map. It is the first phone manufacturer to own a care centre in Nigeria.

    The company also partnered with the Lagos State government to implement the house-numbering project.

    That is why Nokia users have access to a detailed offline map of Lagos State. They connect with their consumers, sell more with the new improved application that provides detailed offline map. Yet, Nokia has no manufacturing or even assembly plant in Nigeria.

    Among many Chinese companies, Huawei has distinguished itself as a telecommunications’ equipment manufacturer. Today, it is the largest telecoms equipment manufacturer.

    In 2010, the company announced a net profit of over $3 billion. In addition, Huawei runs a training facility in Abuja, where people are being trained. This facility is the first of its kind in West Africa.

    Samsung Group, which has about 80 subsidiaries with Samsung Electronics as its main firm, is responsible for 20 per cent of South Korea’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Samsung has a care centre in Nigeria for the servicing, repair and maintenance of its products. In partnership with the Lagos State government, the company also owns a Technical School in Ikeja, Lagos.

    After training, however, beneficiaries still have to go hunting for jobs. In effect, its impact on alleviating unemployment in the country is minimal. If Samsung had a manufacturing plant, the students would have qualified to work there since they already have the technical-knowhow.

    For instance, Nestlé—the consumer-goods company—contributed 15 per cent of Switzerland’s GDP in 2012. It has a vibrant Nigerian subsidiary with a functional manufacturing plant that employs many Nigerians. It has just opened a multi-billion centre in Agbara, Ogun State.

    Guinness storehouse, the home of Guinness, welcomed over one million visitors last year and served as Ireland’s major international major tourist attraction.

    Guinness Nigeria owns a manufacturing plant in the country and undertakes many CSR projects in the community.

    Coca-Cola has over 90,000 employees across more than 200 countries; it contributes immensely to the economy through the employment of many people and execution of projects spread across communities.

    With Toyota as its spearhead, Japan’s automobile industry contributed 10.5 per cent growth to that country’s economy in 2009. It has more than 300,000 employees with the majority being Japanese. Toyota has no manufacturing or assembling plant in Nigeria, yet it is the top selling automobile in the country. Same goes for Germany’s Mercedes Benz.

    Every year, Nigeria churns out graduates in their thousands from different universities with no assurance of employment. Yet, different foreign brands have turned the country into a cash cow.

    It is projected that the sales of smartphones in Nigeria would hit N900 billion by 2015, yet unemployment is at its all-time high, crime in increasing and government is complacent in tackling the malaise.

    These companies have defended their corporate actions. They are shortage of electricity as a crippling factor. The cumulative effect of the staggering cost of generating power in Nigeria is a substantial increase in the cost of production, which means that the goods produced are more expensive than expected.

    Setting up manufacturing and assembly plants should serve to help cut costs for manufacturers since it would mean a reduction in overhead costs such as transportation.

    But when weighed against the astronomical cost of generating power in Nigeria, locating plants outside the country seems a more logical and cost effective choice. The recent spate of insecurity in the country, has served as a further encumbrance as far as this goal is concerned. Would Nigeria continue to be a dump site for these brands? Who is to blame for this misfortune – the government or the companies?

    A Professor of Economics, Makinwa Olusegun, said: “A nation that would grow must first of all grow its manufacturing sector, encourage foreign investors to build their manufacturing plants in the country. Countries such as India grew like that. If we continue to be consumers and not producers, we would end up being stagnant and may not be able to cope with the level of unemployment that would hit the country in another 10 years.

    “The government should first of all create an enabling environment for local brands to grow, and also for foreign brands and investors; make importation almost impossible and make foreign companies see the cost effectiveness of stabling their either manufacturing or assembly plant in the country.

    “For example, many companies are running to Ghana to produce and then come to Nigeria to sell. They sell 90 per cent of what they produce in Ghana here, that fact is quite unnerving. This would surely continue if it does not get worse if the government doesn’t do anything about it on time to salvage the crisis,” he said.

  • CBN advocates reforms to stabilise economy

    CBN advocates reforms to stabilise economy

    There is need to carry out radical reforms in the financial system of the country to achieve stability in the economy, Central bank of Nigeria’s (CBN’s) Deputy Governor, Corporate Services, Suleiman Barau, has said.

    Speaking at this year’s EuroFinance Conference in Lagos at the weekend, Barau, who was represented by the Deputy Director of Banking Supervision, Steve Nwadiuko, said such the restructuring was the only way to avoid massive corporate failure witnessed during the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009, which exposed the weaknesses in many banks.

    He said reforms were needed to strengthen the stability and resilience of the global financial system and prevent the reoccurrence of systematic crisis.

    He said chief finance officers of banks across the globe need to design strategies that would adequately address possible hitches in the financial system.

    He said in Nigeria, the CBN has carried out reforms that are aimed at achieving financial system stability and instituting sound corporate governance. These, he said, has ensured that the financial system thrives to add needed support to the real sector and the economy.

    He said the reforms are anchored on enhancing the quality of banks, establishment of financial stability and ensuring that the financial sector contributes to the economy.