Tag: EFCC

  • Bala Mohammed vs EFCC: Matters miscellaneous

    In any decent society where some premium is placed on human dignity, the accepted jurisprudential position is that, it is better for many suspects to escape unpunished than for one innocent person to be wrongly convicted. Unfortunately, the way accused persons are treated in Nigeria does not depict us as people who place much value on the dignity of the human person. Even our long cherished principle that an accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty has suffered brutal assault at the hands of overzealous agents of government. To such people, who may not necessarily be in the majority, it doesn’t really matter if hundreds of ‘suspects’ are hounded into jail if only, in the process, one targeted person is incarcerated.

    However, the recent judgement in Senator Bala Mohammed versus the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC appears to provide a new impetus for victims of official highhandedness to challenge their traducers while at the same time rekindling hope that, somehow, the country will not descend to the reign of tyranny. Former FCT Minister, Bala Mohammed’s fight, to enforce his fundamental human rights is solid proof that, what it takes for tyranny to take root is for good people to keep quiet or for the injured to refuse to fight back.

    The former minister’s case is well known. After heeding the invitation by the EFCC, based on allegations against him, he ended up being incarcerated for 49 days in 2016, despite meeting the bail conditions imposed by the agency. To make matters worse, not even a court order could sway the agency to desist from its abuse of the constitution by way of arbitrary detention of the minister. That set the stage for the former minister’s counsel, Chris Uche, SAN, to approach the court to enforce his client’s fundamental human rights.

    Thus, last Thursday, in a judgement that is being celebrated as victory for the rule of law, Justice Baba Yusuf of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, ruled that Bala Mohammed’s detention was unlawful. He followed up by awarding Five Million Naira against the anti-graft agency.

    Justice Baba Yusuf deserves commendation for being incisive, methodical and fearless in delivering his judgement. He has restored hope that ours is a country of laws, not of men as the EFCC, by its conduct, has all along sought to convey. The judge was emphatic that in the absence of compelling evidence of any crime, the EFCC had no right to detain the former minister beyond 48 hours. That point needs to be noted by all Nigerians.

    But while the abridgement of the ex-minister’s civil liberty loomed large in the judge’s decision, it will appear that, a more fundamental reason was the inability of the anti-graft agency to adduce any evidence to support its claims of wrongdoing against the accused. The judge was unambiguous on that. Here are excerpts from the judgement:

    “Where a party admits the detention of another, the onus to prove that such detention is legal lies on it. In the instant case, no material evidence of fraud, irregular allocation of plots of land among others is placed before this court.

    “All other averments relating to fraudulent activities against the applicant remain largely in the realm of imagination of the respondent and unproved as there is no such document before the court. The result is that the respondent has not proven the allegation to warrant the court to decide otherwise”.

    The judge’s statement, above, should be read in conjunction with the section where he averred that he saw nothing wrong with Bala Mohammed’s arrest by the EFCC. That is to say that, by arresting Senator Bala Mohammed, the EFCC was acting within its powers, to hold public office holders, past or present, accountable for their actions. Yet, we must continue to underscore the judge’s position that the agency did not have the powers to detain people endlessly without cause; and that he could not see evidence of allegation of fraud against the former minister.

    On a serious note, Bala Mohammed did not deserve the incarceration he was subjected to. Here was a man who, upon being informed that the EFCC needed him to respond to some allegations against him, voluntarily abandoned medical treatment abroad in order to honour the invitation. Here was a man who, for all times, maintained his support for the anti-graft effort of President Muhammadu Buhari, insisting always that public office holders should be prepared to account for their actions while in office. Also as a sign of good faith, Bala Mohammed has actively participated in every legislative enquiry bothering on his office or ministry. It is one of those paradoxes of life that such a Nigerian who has never given any cause to suspect that he would jump bail, was deprived his freedom for so long a period, in defiance of the order of a court of competent jurisdiction.

    Now that he has been vindicated by the court judgement Senator Mohammed is in a stronger position to insist that, his incarceration, beyond what is statutorily permitted, was politically motivated. Since the court has ruled that there was no evidence of fraud or wrong-doing to support his prolonged incarceration, Bala Mohammed is on solid grounds to insist that he is a victim of some grand conspiracy to demonize him before the Nigerian public and probably put his political future in jeopardy. As things stand, the promoters of that strategy have failed. At least, nothing has happened to erode his political base in Bauchi.

    No one who followed the twists and turns of the former minister’s incarceration should be surprised at the judgement of Justice Baba Yusuf. In an unprecedented manner, the agency literally went about shopping for remand orders to shackle the former minister, in perpetuity. At every point during the trial, Chris Uche, SAN, adroitly punctured the alibi of the defence which included the inability of the accused to meet his bail terms, a claim that was false; that he would interfere with investigations, a position the judge found curious or that, he would influence another person of interest whose whereabouts were then not known. Again, the judge wondered how the detainee was expected to influence someone outside while still under the custody of the agency!

    For the EFCC, this highly indicting judgment should act as a sobering influence on the way it conducts its activities. To arrogate to itself the powers to simply dump people in jail indefinitely is, to say the least, uncivilized and barbaric; to hang serious allegations against a person without proof of evidence, as the judge noted in the case of Senator Bala Mohammed, is malicious, callous and unacceptable; and to constrain citizens with brazen impunity, in defiance of court orders, is to send a wrong signal to Diaspora Nigerians and other foreign investors who, paradoxically, our President and his ministers, have been courting assiduously, that the law cannot protect both they and their investments. It does not need to be overstated that Nigeria can ill afford the reputation of a lawless destination at a time the President Buhari Administration is almost recording a breakthrough in its valiant effort to attract foreign direct investment into the country.

    In conclusion, it is important that we recognise the milestones achieved by this judgment. Paramount among the milestones is the vindication of Bala Mohammed with the concomitant redemption of his image which the agency had sought to batter through the instrumentality of media trial and other subterfuges. Second, other victims of official high-handedness, impunity and arbitrariness now have a pedestal on which to launch their redemption plans. But by far the most important beneficiaries of this judgement are President Buhari and the country: it feels good to realize that there are checks and balances to handle the excesses of security agencies; that the judicial system can be trusted to act as the last hope of every Nigerian no matter the person’s social standing and that, in spite of our many challenges, this indeed is a great country on the threshold of being redeemed.

     

    • Agu, publisher of ZEST TRAVELLER magazine is a fellow of the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) and Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ) as well as honorary fellow of the Nigerian Institute of Public Relations (NIPR).

     

  • Court orders forfeiture of Patience Jonathan’s Abuja property

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the interim forfeiture of two buildings allegedly owned by former First Lady, Patience Jonathan.

    Justice Nnamdi Dimgba, in a ruling on Monday said the interim order granted based on an application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), shall last for 45 days, but subject to renewal upon application by the EFCC.

    The property are identified as: Plot No: 1960 Cadastral Zone A05 Maitama District and 1758 Cadastral Zone A00 Business District, Abuja, located on Shehu Yar’Adua Way, along Mabushi-Kado Life Camp Expressway, Abuja.

    The property currently serve as the headquarters of two groups –  A. Aruera Reachout Foundation/Women For Change and Development Initiative – linked with the ex-First Lady.

    The judge also restrained the owners of the property from selling or mortgaging them while the forfeiture order lasts.

    Justice Dimgba said the orders were necessary to enable the EFCC conduct its investigation on the property.

    The said the applicant should, at the end of its investigation, file charges where the allegations against the respondents are established.

    The judge said: “I hereby accordingly grant reliefs 1 and 2 sought.  Relief 3 is refused, because it is not supported by the grounds of the application and thus unnecessary in the circumstances of the application.”

    The two reliefs granted are:

    *An order of interim attachment / forfeiture of the asset and property set out in the schedule attached herein. (Plot No. 1960 Cadastral Zone A05, MAitama District, Abuja; and Plot No. 1350, Cadastral Zone A00, Abuja).

    *An order stopping any disposal, conveyance, mortgage, lease, sale or alienation or otherwise of the property/asset described in the schedule herein

    The third relief refused by the court related to EFCC’s request for permission to appoint either a firm or individuals to manage the property.

    The judge added: “The order of court granting the reliefs shall last only for a period of 45 days within which the applicant must conclude their investigation and file necessary criminal charges where investigation reveals the commission of a crime.

    “The applicant is at liberty to apply for a renewal of the order on cause, provided that such an application to be valid is made before the expiry of the 45 days validity period granted by the Court.

    “Given the highly contentious nature of this application, I further order that where the applicant wishes to physically access the attached properties in execution of the order herein made, the applicant with the representatives of the respondent, shall take an inventory of all the contents and fixtures of the properties and shall file a report/result of such inventory to this court.”

    The judge dismissed the respondent’s objection to the suit. In dismissing the objection, the judge rejected the respondent’s argument that the suit was not properly commenced and that it was an abuse of court process.

    Lawyer to the respondent, Mike Ozekhome (SAN), while reacting to  the court’s decision said by the judgment, his client has lost nothing.

    “We did not lose,we  won. What the EFCC wanted was for the property in dispute attached and forfeited to the government but the court refused and instead gave them 45 days to further investigate and prosecute if they so wish with liberty to apply for renewal.

    “That is actually victory for us as the property was not forfeited,” Ozekhome said.

    Read Also: Court grants interim forfeiture of Patience Jonathan’s property

     

  • Court convicts Nwobike for perversion of justice

    Lawyer appeals judgment

    Justice Raliat Adebiyi of a Lagos High Court sitting at Ikeja on Monday convicted a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Joseph Nwobike,  for perversion of justice.

    The judge gave the verdict while delivering judgment in the criminal charge filed against the lawyer by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Nwobike was convicted in  12 out of the 13-count charge.

    Each count carries a jail term of two years.

    However, the judge sentenced the lawyer to 30 days imprisonment on the charges.

    According to Justice Adebiyi, the court considered the fact that Nwobike has  no previous criminal record, his comportment in court and other factors before reducing the prescribed two years jail term to 30 days.

    She said the lawyer’s conviction would send serious signal about government’s determination to fight corruption.

    Meanwhile, Nwobike has appealed the judgement at the Court of Appeal in Lagos.

    In a notice of appeal which was immediately filed by Nwobike’s lawyer, Wale Akoni (SAN), Nwobike contended that the allegation of attempt to pervert justice was not proved by the EFCC.

    He insisted that the judgment was unreasonable and unwarranted.

     

     

     

     

  • Court orders forfeiture of NGF’s N1.4b to FG

    Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court in Lagos on Friday ordered the forfeiture of N1, 442,384,857.84 belonging to the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) to the Federal Government.

    The sum was found by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in the bank accounts of three firms accused of impersonating consultants hired by the NGF to analyse the Paris/London Club loan refunds due to the states.

    The order is sequel to an October 13, 2017 interim forfeiture order obtained by the EFCC from the court, which placed a “Post No Debit” order on the accounts containing the N1.4billion and N220million.

    The EFCC, which also secured Friday’s order, alleged that the firms obtained N3.5billion from the NGF by making false claims.

    The firms are – Melrose General Services Limited, WASP Networks Limited and Thebe Wellness Services.

    They were accused of impersonating a consortium of consulting firms engaged by the NGF for the “verification, reconciliation and recovery of over-deductions on Paris and London Club Loans on the accounts of states and local governments between 1995 and 2002.”

    The EFCC said the original firms engaged by the Forum were GSCL Consulting and Bizplus Consulting Services Limited.

    But an EFCC investigator, Usman Zakari, said the alter ego of Melrose General Services Limited, Robert Mbonu, made a false representation to the NGF, causing it to pay N3.5billion to his company on December 14, 2016.

    Zakari said the money was credited into the Access Bank account of Melrose General Services Limited, adding that the respondents dissipated and laundered about N2.3billion out of the money between December 15, 2016, and January 20, 2017, leaving a balance of N1.2billion.

    Zakari said the anti-graft agency had recovered N220million out of the laundered sum from the second and third respondents.

    Justice Olatoregun’s October 13, 2017 interim order followed a prayer by EFCC counsel, Ekene Iheanacho, who said it would best serve the interest of justice for the respondents to be ordered to forfeit the N1.4billion temporarily to prevent them from dissipating same.

    In upholding Iheanacho’s application, the judge directed the EFCC to publish the order in a national daily.

    She gave anyone interested in the funds 14 days to appear before her to show cause why the funds should not be forfeited permanently.

    Subsequently, one Prince Godwin Maduka and Linas International Limited showed up before the court, praying separately that the funds should be forfeited to them.

    Maduka claimed that his firm, Udemgaba Maduka & Associates, had been engaged in 2011 as a consultant by Zamfara State Government to help the state recover some hanging funds, with an agreement that it would be paid 20 per cent of the recovered funds.

    He urged the court to forfeit the N1.4billion to his company to cover Zamfara State’s alleged indebtedness to him.

    But the EFCC opposed Maduka, contending that the suit was not a debt recovery suit and that Zamfara State was not a party to the suit.

    In a ruling on Friday, Justice Olatoregun upheld the EFCC’s argument and dismissed Maduka’s claims.

     

  • Fraud: I have no case to answer – Jonathan’s aide

    A former Senior Special Assistant on Domestic Affairs to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, Dr. Waripamo Owei-Emmanuel Dudafa, on Thursday told the Federal High Court in Lagos that he has no case to answer in a N1.5 billion fraud charge.

    Dudafa and his co-defendants in the case, Iwejuo Joseph Nna, also known as Taiwo A. Ebenezer, and Olugbenga Isaiah, asked Justice Mohammed Idris to discharge and acquit them.

    They made their no-case- submissions in separate applications.

    Arraigned alongside the trio are four firms – Seagate Property Development & Investment Limited, Avalon Global Property Development Company Limited, Pluto Property Limited Investment Company Limited and Rotate Interlink Services Limited.

    The offences, according to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), contravened sections 17(a), 18(c) and 27 (3) (c) of the EFCC Act, 2004.

    At the last hearing of the case, the EFCC, through its counsel, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, closed its case.

    But the defendants through their counsel, A. Olufolaju, who stood in for Gboyega Oyewole (SAN), and Mr. Ige Asemudara, declined to open their defence on Thursday.

    They told Justice Idris that their no-case-submission was anchored on sections 302, 303, 357 and 358 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, and Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    They averred, among others, that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the offences linking them to the charges.

    “The applications have been served on the prosecution,” Asemudara said.

    Oyedepo confirmed he had just been served by the defendants and sought time to file a response.

    Justice Idris upheld his application and adjourned till May 15.

  • Drama as Innoson’s counsel engages court in war of words over jurisdiction

    A mild drama ensued on Tuesday at an Ikeja Special Offences Court as the chairman of Innoson Motors Nigeria Limited, Innocent Chukwu failed to appear in court for his arraignment, for the fourth time.

    Innoson had previously failed to face charges of alleged fraud preferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crime Commission on January 17February 9 and March 14.

    At the last sitting of the court on March 14,  Innoson through his counsel, Mr George Uwechue (SAN),  was said to have petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC) over Justice Mojisola Dada, the judge trying the case.

    He was said to have expressed doubts of getting a fair trial before the judge.

    At resumed sitting of the court yesterday, Justice Dada told Innoson’s defence team led by Mr Uwechue that she would not hear any application brought by them in the absence of the defendant.

    “No application will be moved in the absence of the defendant, my position remains the same.

    “You can bring a thousand applications before me for all I care but no application can be heard in this court without the presence of the defendant,” Justice Dada said.

    Earlier,  Uwechue had moved that the defence has an application challenging the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the charges brought against his client by the EFCC.

    He argued: “where there is an application before the court challenging jurisdiction, the court has a duty to hear the application even in the absence of the defendant.” Justice Dada, however, insisted that she will not hear any application until Innoson was present in court.

    Uwechue, apparently taken aback by the response of the trial judge, insisted that his application must be taken by the court.

    “You cannot stand me down My Lord, you cannot stampede me My Lord. I’m an octogenarian, I’m 50 plus years at the bar,” Uwechue shouted.

    But Justice Dada would not be moved with the outburst of the defence counsel but rather retorted that that is the more reason why Uwechue should be better composed and comported, and mustn’t   injure himself.

    The heat generated by Uwechue’s outburst, further led to an exchange of words between the senior lawyer, Prof. J. N Mbadugha and the lead prosecuting counsel for the EFCC, Mr Anselem Ozioko.

    At a point, Uwechue threatened to quit legal practice because of the conduct of Ozioko, the EFCC counsel.

    Ozioko had told the court earlier that proceedings can go on despite the petition written to the NJC against Justice Dada by the defendant.

    “I have it on good record that where there is a petition against a court, the court can proceed with the matter.
    We have the NJC’s directions to that effect so that we can proceed with the case.

    “I have also been served with many processes today by the defence one of which is a motion asking the court to set aside a process that my learned friend, Mbadugha, had received in open court.

    “I’m sure that he realizes that it will affect him negatively, that is why he brought the motion,” he said.

    The EFCC prosecutor added that the anti-graft commission was taking steps to ensure Innoson’s attendance in the next court date.

    Mbadugha, who is also the defence lawyer for Innoson Motors Nigeria Ltd, had also told the court that he had through an appeal, challenged the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case.

    “We have not been availed of the NJC’s directive, we have gone to the court of appeal as regards jurisdiction,” Mbadugha said.

    Chukwuma and his company, Innoson Motors Nigeria Limited are to be arraigned on a four-count charge of conspiracy to obtain property by false pretenses, obtaining property by false pretenses, stealing and forgery.

    According to the charge sheet, the defendants committed the offences between 2009 and July 2011 in Lagos.

    The EFCC had alleged that defendants, with intent to defraud, conspired to obtain by false pretenses, containers of motorcycle, spare parts and raw materials, property of Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB) from Mitsui OSK Lines Limited, Apapa, Lagos.

    They were alleged to have fraudulently induced staff of Mitsui OSK and Maersk Line to deliver to them via their clearing agents the goods which were imported from China in the name of GTB by falsely pretending that they were authorised by the bank to clear the goods.

    The prosecution claimed that the defendants forged a bill of lading numbered 598286020 of Maersk Line Limited and 11007950841 of Mutsui O.S.K Lines by knowingly putting a false GTB stamp and signature of the bank staff in order to facilitate the fraud.

    It was alleged that the forged documents were meant to be used or acted upon as genuine to the prejudice of any person within Lagos or elsewhere.

    The EFCC said the offences contravened Sections 1(1)(b), 1(3), and 8(a) of the Advanced Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act 2016 and Sections 309(9), 388, 465 and 467(1)(j) of the Criminal Code, Laws of Lagos State 2003.

    Justice Dada adjourned the matter until May 24 for arraignment of the automobile boss.

    NAN

  • Alleged N4b fraud: EFCC relocates Senator Nwaoboshi to Lagos for trial

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday relocated Senator Peter Onyeluka Nwaoboshi to Lagos for trial for alleged unexecuted N4billion contracts and having 20 accounts in six banks with a different signatory.

    It is unclear when the Senator, who represents Delta North Senatorial District, will face a separate trial for allegedly obtaining a N1.2billion loan from Nigerian Export-Import Bank (NEXIM) to purchase electrical equipment but he ended up diverting the facility to personal use.

    The Senator  did not  allegedly declare all the companies and banks account he has interest despite being operational prior to the time he made the declaration.

    Another issue against the Senator was alleged use of a firm, Golden Touch Construction Project Limited to purchase a 12-storey building in Apapa Lagos belonging to Delta State Government at the cost of N805, 000,000.00.

    A top source in EFCC, who spoke in confidence, said: “The detained Senator has been relocated to Lagos for arraignment before a High Court because it is one of the jurisdictions he has committed some infractions.

    “We are still looking into the NEXIM case and alleged violation of the Code of Conduct for Public Officers. So, he might face separate trials if the ongoing investigations confirm prima facie evidence against him.”

    A Federal High Court in Lagos had in April ordered the temporary forfeiture of a 12-storeyed building belonging to the senator over an alleged contract scam of N1.5bn.

    The said building which the court ordered Nwaoboshi to forfeit to the Federal Government is located at 27, Marine Road, Apapa.

    Justice Anka made the forfeiture order after entertaining an ex parte application brought before him by the EFCC.

    Joined with Nwaoboshi in the application were his two companies – Golden Touch Construction Project Limited, and Bilderberg Enterprises Limited.

    The EFCC told the judge that Nwaoboshi, through his company, Bilderberg Enterprises Limited, got a N1.580bn contract to supply some construction equipment to the Delta State Direct Labour Agency sometime in 2010.

  • EFCC arraigns ex-governor Shema for SURE-P fraud

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday arraigned a former Governor of Katsina State, Ibrahim Shehu Shema, before Justice Babagana Ashgar of the Federal High Court on a 26-count charge of conspiracy and money laundering of N5, 776,552,396.

    Shema was accused of laundering the cash which was allegedly stolen from the account of Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) in Katsina.

    The ex-governor, in a statement on Tuesday night, said he was being persecuted by Governor Aminu Masari.

    According to a statement issued by the Head of Media and Publicity of EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, the suspect allegedly conspired with one Idris Kwado who is on the run, to perpetrate the fraud.

    One of the charges against the former governor reads:  “That you Ibrahim Shehu Shema whilst being the Executive Governor of Katsina State on or about the 17th February, 2014 at Katsina, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court did indirectly control the sum of N502,216,400 withdrawn from Katsina State SURE-P bank account  meant for peace education, advocacy and mediation programme which money you ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act to wit; Fraud and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 15(2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under section 15(3) of the same Act.”

    Shema pleaded not guilty to the charges but the court dismissed his application challenging the competency of the charge and jurisdiction of court to try him.

    Justice Ashgar agreed with the submission of the prosecuting counsel, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), that  objections as stipulated in section 396 (2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 can only be taken after the plea of the defendant has been taken.

    Consequently, the application was dismissed.

     

  • EFCC grills Nwaoboshi over N4b contracts

    For hours yesterday,  Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) detectives quizzed Senator Peter Onyeluka Nwaoboshi over alleged unexecuted N4billion contracts and 20 accounts in six banks.

    The senator, who represents Delta North Senatorial District, is also under investigation for allegedly obtaining a N1.2billion loan from Nigerian Export-Import Bank (NEXIM) to buy electrical equipment and diverting the facility to personal use.

    Three years after securing the loan for his firm, he has paid back just N150million.

    Another issue against the Senator was the alleged use of a firm, Golden Touch Construction Project Limited, to purchase a 12-storey building in Apapa Lagos belonging to Delta State Government at the cost of N805, 000,000.00.

    It was learnt that a response from the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) showed that the Senator “did not declare all the companies and banks account he has interest in despite being operational prior to the time he made the declaration.”

    The EFCC closed in on the Senator following a petition from Delta State.

    A top source in EFCC said: “The Senator is in our custody to respond to allegations against him. So far, he has been with a team of detectives handling the multiple cases concerning him before this commission.

    “It is too early to say whether the EFCC will detain him. He has many questions to answer.”

    A brief by the EFCC on the Senator indicated that Nwaoboshi secured theN1.2billion loan, under the Local Industrial Growth Scheme, when he was sitting on the Board of Directors of NEXIM Bank.

    Although Nwaoboshi excused himself on the day the NEXIM board approved the facility for his company, the anti-graft agency said the deal smacked of internal abuse.”

    The document reads in part: “The EFCC is probing how the Senator allegedly diverted part of a N1.2billion facility granted to him in 2014 by NEXIM Bank under the Local Industrial Growth Scheme.

    “The loan, which was approved for the senator when he was a member of the bank’s board of directors, was meant for the purchase of equipment and electrical materials but the senator allegedly diverted part of the funds to acquire properties in Lagos.

    “Criminal diversion is a serious offence and NEXIM may have to report him to the Central Bank of Nigeria. As a director of the bank, the circumstance of the award of the loan is one that raises fundamental conflict of interest and corporate governance issues.”

    A petitioner also claimed  that the Senator allegedly owned ‘Bilderberg Enterprises Ltd’  which was awarded a contract by the Direct Labour Agency, Delta State to supply construction equipment in the sum of N1,580,000,000.00.

    But instead of supplying according to the specifications, the Senator was alleged to have supplied used equipment contrary to the Bill of Quantity which specified new ones.

    Also Bilderberg Enterprises Limited (previously known as Bilderberg Enterprises Nigeria Ltd) was alleged to have secured contracts from Nine (9) Local Government Areas in Delta worth over N2billion when the said company was yet to be registered under the Company and Allied Matters Act.

    The same Senator’s firm was alleged to have secured another contract to supply N474, 936,000 machinery like Bulldozers, Pail loaders and Tipper Lorries by the Delta State Waste Management Board.

    The EFCC however found out that the equipment were used items contrary to contract specifications.

    About five firms had been traced to the Senator including  Bilderberg Enterprises Ltd, Suiming Electricals Limited, Golden Touch Construction Project Limited, Jupes Global Nigeria, and District Construction Trumile Service.

    On the question of accounts, the Senator’s personal and companies’ banks accounts were linked to the Bank Verification Number (BVN) 22300559079 which has more than 20 bank accounts domiciled in six different banks.

    But one Ogom Augustine Nwaoboshi is the sole signatory to the accounts.

    A one foreign account identified with the Senator  was also located by the EFCC’s investigation team

    The account is designated as No 4004241 with HSBC Bank in Marbile Arch London, United Kingdom.

    Also, ex-Plateau State Governor  David Jang was yesterday quizzed for over seven and a half hours over alleged diversion of N2billion Small and Medium Scale Enterprises funds facility advanced to the state by the Central Bank of Nigeria(CBN) during his tenure.

    Another source added: “The SME cash was released to Plateau State a month before the expiration of Jang’s tenure in 2015. We asked him about the whereabouts of the funds. He is expected to provide the list of beneficiaries.

    “But our detectives have retrieved all documents relating to the facility. We are probing clues on how the money was diverted.

    “We are likely to take on Jang again this week because he owes the people of the state a duty to account for the N2billion.”