Tag: EFCC

  • Alleged fraud: Supreme Court orders ex-governor Shema to face trial

    Alleged fraud: Supreme Court orders ex-governor Shema to face trial

    The Supreme Court on Friday affirmed the judgment of Court of Appeal, Kaduna, which authorised the trial of ex-governor of Katsina State, Ibrahim Shema.

    The ex-governor is standing trial for alleged N11 billion fraud.

    Shema was arraigned along Sani Makana, Lawal Safana and Ibrahim Dankaba by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Delivering judgement on the interlocutory application filed by the accused persons,  Justice Sidi Bage held that the constitution  empowered the EFCC to prosecute suspects on graft allegations at federal and state levels.

    Justice Bage added that evidence placed before the apex court had shown that the EFCC front-loaded necessary documents along with the charge sheet to the applicants to prepare their defence.

    He said: “The action of the ex-governor and the three other applicants cannot tempt the court to over-rule itself.

    “The apex court took time to explain the powers of the EFCC to work within both federal laws and penal codes of states in ex-governors’ Joshua Dariye and Jolly Nyame similar applications.

    Read Also: S/Court’s officer misled NIS on Justice Ngwuta’s passports – Witness

    “The full strength of the court met over this application and we have resolved not to over-rule ourselves on application that is clearly meritorious

    “In the circumstance, the application is dismissed on the grounds that the EFCC has the powers to prosecute anybody found to have committed fraud in any part of the country.

    “The panel therefore affirms the judgment of the Appeal Court, Kaduna, delivered on September 13, 2017, which mandated the applicants to submit themselves to trial at the High Court of Katsina.”

    EFCC had arraigned Shema and other accused persons before Justice Maikaita Bako of the state High Court for allegedly defrauding the state during his eight years stint as governor.

    The defendants had approached the apex court to set aside the decisions of the lower courts.

     

    NAN

  • Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Attend court Feb. 5 or be returned to prison, judge tells Metuh

    Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered a former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party ( PDP ) Olisa Metuh, to attend court on February 5 or be arrested and returned to prison.

    Justice Abang gave the order yesterday whiling on two applications. One by Metuh’s lawyer, Okezie Ikpeazu (SAN), for adjournment on health ground and the other by prosecution lawyern Sylvanus Tahir, seeking the revocation of Metuh’s bail for allegedly being absent in court for not cogent reasons.

    The judge said Metuh had been absent from his trial since Monday without any lawful excuse. This, the judge said, was a sufficient reason to revoke the defendant’s bail.

    Metuh and his company, Dextra Investment Limited are being tried on money laundering charges before the court.

    Last Monday, Metuh was absent in court and his lawyer said he was on admission at the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Anambra State. He drew the court’s attention to a letter to thate effecr from the hospital.

    On Tuesday, Ikpeazu applied for an adjournment of the case to a period outside this week based on the health situation of his client, an application Tahir objected to.

    Tahir described the letter from the Nnamdi Azikiwe Teaching Hospital, relied on by Ikpeazu as worthless. 

    He urged the court to revoke  Metuh’s bail and return him to prison, from where he should be made to attend his trial.

    Justice Abang, in his ruling, noted that  the medical report  relied on by Metuh to stay away from court was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and aimed at forcing the court to stay proceedings in the trial indefinitely.

    The judge said EFCC’s application for the revocation of Metuh’s bail deserved to be granted, but that the court decided to suspend taking such step in order to afford the defendant another opportunity “to turn over a new leaf”.

    He agreed with Tahir to the effect the hospital’s letter dated January 21, 2018 indicating that Metuh had been on admission since the previous day, for treatment for an ailment, was sent to the court to frustrate the trial.

    He queried why the medical report had to be issued barely 24 hours to the resumption of the trial on January 22.

    The judge also queried how the letter issued in Nnewi, Anambra State, could find its way to the court’s file in Abuja within 24 hours. 

    He said the letter was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file and defence lawyers chose to rely on it to ask for an adjournment yet refused to disclose the identity of the person who sent the document to the court.

    He noted that the “lengthy letter” by the hospital laced with many medical terms, was meant to confuse the court.

    “How will the court, not being an expert in the medical field, be able to understand it, if not to confuse the court and give the impression that the ailment is serious?” the judge asked.

    He ruled that the letter having not been filed before the court through established procedure and without any indication on it linking it to the trial, the EFCC’s lawyer was right to describe it as “a trash meant for the dustbin”.

    The judge noted that the letter failed to state the period that the defendant must be on bed restam He said it could be implied that the court had to adjourn the case indefinitely. 

    He said the application was like an application for stay of proceedings, which had been prohibited in criminal trials by the Supreme Court.

    He said: “That means the court will be forced to adjourned sine die (indefinitely). It is my humble view that this sounds like an application for stay of proceedings. It is not just a medical report but an application for stay of proceedings.”

    He recalled that the Supreme Court had in its judgment delivered on June 9, 2017, on an appeal by Metuh prohibited stay of proceedings in a criminal trial.

    The judge also recalled that the Supreme Court, delivering judgment in an appeal by Metuh’s firm and co-defendant, Destra Investments Limited, on January 12, 2018, had ordered the Federal Court to give the case an accelerated hearing.

    He said:  “Any purported medical report that will act as a stay of proceedings ought to be rejected by the court. The medical report was fraudulently smuggled into the court’s file.

    “I agree with the learned counsel for the prosecution that it a trash meant for the dustbin. It is a useless paper only dumped on the court.”

    He however said out of human sympathy he would consider the plea by defence lawyers  by adjourning the case till February 5.

    The judge said, “‎In view of the passionate plea by the learned senior counsel for the first and second defendants, I hereby suspend my decision to revoke the bail granted to the first defendant. I hereby give him another chance to turn over a new leaf.

    “Where the situation remains the same at the next adjourned date, this court shall exercise its power of revoking the bail. This matter is adjourned till February 5 and 6 for continuation of trial.”

    The judge further said that Metuh’s application for adjournment as argued on Tuesday and Wednesday had been overtaken by events since by his (Metuh’s) conduct, the court had been unable to record progress in the case since Monday.

    The judge granted the application by Metuh,  to call additional 10 witnesses.

    He noted that Metuh had engaged in different ploys to frustrate the trial and attempts, “to hijack the proceedings.

    “The first defendant has overstretched the patience of the court beyond limit in these proceedings,” Justice Abang said..

    He said the court would no longer accept any medical report from Metuh.

    The judge also ruled that the court would no longer entertain any application for adjournment to enable the defendant to call any witness.

    He therefore directed that all the remaining witnesses Metuh had to call must always be in court for all proceedings.

    Ikpeazu and lawyer to Destra, Tochukwu Onwugbufor (SAN), thanked the judge for showing sympathy to Metuh.

    They promised not to stall the trial, and noted that the judge has always given the case accelerated hearing before the January 12, 2018 judgment of the Supreme Court, which directed that the case be promptly decided.

  • Nganjiwa: EFCC files appeal at Supreme Court

    Nganjiwa: EFCC files appeal at Supreme Court

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has asked the Supreme Court to reverse a Court of Appeal decision which quashed a corruption charge against Justice Hyeladzira Nganjiwa.

    It prayed the apex court to declare that the appellate court erred in law when it struck out the EFCC’s 14-count charge of corrupt enrichment against Nganjiwa.

    It urged the Supreme Court to, among others, declare that the appellate court’s decision was ultra vires because it conferred procedural immunity on the judge contrary to the 1999 Constitution as amended.

    The notice of appeal, which was filed by appellant’s counsel Messrs Jibrin Samuel Okutepa SAN, Wahab Shittu, Jiti Ogunye and Rotimi Oyedepo, was acknowledged yesterday by the apex court.

    Nganjiwa, judge of the Federal High Court, Bayelsa Division was arraigned before Justice Adedayo Akintoye of the Lagos High Court in Igbosere last june 23.

    The EFCC said he received a total of $260,000 and N8.5million to unlawfully enrich himself as a public official.

    Nganjiwa pleaded not guilty.

    The judge, through a preliminary objection argued by his counsel Robert Clarke SAN, challenged Justice Akintoye’s jurisdiction to entertain the charge.

    Last December 11, a three-man panel of the appellate court’s Lagos division presided over by Justice Adejumo Obaseki upheld Clarke’s contention that by virtue of Section 158 of the 1999 Constitution, only the National Judicial Council had the power to deal with the kind of allegations brought by the EFCC against his client, a serving judge.

    The appellate court agreed with Clarke that a judge could not be prosecuted until such judge had either been dismissed or compulsorily retired by the National Judicial Council.

    But in yesterday’s notice of appeal, the EFCC formulated 10 grounds of appeal challenging that entire judgment which upheld the preliminary objection.

    It prayed the court to declare that “the Court of Appeal was in error by introducing a procedural immunity clause for judges with substantive immunity protection contrary to the provisions of the Constitution.

    “The National Judicial Council lacks the powers of law enforcement agencies.

    “The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the prosecuting law enforcement agency in this case, has a wide range of powers to investigate and prosecute financial crimes.

    The commission further submitted that “The National Judicial Council (NJC) is only vested with the exercise of disciplinary powers against Judicial officers without such powers extending to criminal prosecution.”

    The EFCC is seeking to move the court to hold that “offences under the Criminal Law as acknowledged in the judgement of the Court of Appeal can only be investigated and prosecuted by law enforcement agencies without prejudice to the exercise of disciplinary powers by the NJC without any of the exercise of such powers being dependent on the other.

    According to it, “Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) does not confer immunity from investigation and prosecution on judicial officers.

    “There is no provision of the Constitution making the exercise of powers of law enforcement agencies on investigation and prosecution dependent on the exercise of powers by the NJC in the context of criminal offences allegedly committed by judicial officers in the discharge or outside the discharge of duties by judicial officers.”

    No date has been fixed for the hearing of the appeal.

  • EFCC arrests own staff, girl friend in Maiduguri

    EFCC arrests own staff, girl friend in Maiduguri

    The Borno State Zonal Office of the Economic And Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) said they have arrested two of her Staff , Detective Assistant Habila Dungji Buba and his girlfriend Keron Ayuba Lapips , an undergraduate of University of Maiduguri , and one Bashir Muhammad, a police Sergeant deployed to the Commission over theft of case file in an attempt to scuttle justice.

    Briefing newsmen in Maiduguri on Wednesday, Mr. Aliyu Ado Aliyu , the EFCC Zonal Head for Maiduguri stated the suspects are currently at the EFCC detention facility awaiting prosecution after thorough investigation is concluded.

    Mr. Aliyu also informed that the zonal office has secured two convictions including many recoveries in month of January , adding that “internal checks have also been weeding out the bad eggs within the Commission’s Staff.

    Mr. Aliyu while narrating how the suspects were arrested said: ” on Friday the 19th of January , 2017 , this zonal office got information from one of its suspects under investigation that someone posing as a Staff of the commission intimated him on phone about a case under investigation involving him and which the alleged imposter promised to avail him with the original casefile on condition for payment of an amount of money.

    ” The commission then detailed a team of operatives to investigate the matter. During investigation, a Staff of the Commission , one Detective Assistant Habila Dungji Buba and his girlfriend, Keron Ayuba Lapips, an undergraduate of the University of Maiduguri were arrested while trying to make an exchange of the said casefile reported in the matter.

    ” The said Detective Assistant then revealed to the team of investigators one Sgt Bashir Muhammad, a police officer attached to the Maiduguri zonal office, as the person who gave him the said casefile and also guided him on how to carry out the exchange successfully, on the grounds of helping him secure money to buy a car for which he had earlier informed the said sergeant of his need and also of his financial incapacity.”

    He said investigation into the matter is still ongoing and more facts are expected soon, adding that “the public is hereby urged to report to any of its Office , demands for anything by any Person(s) regarding information on its cases as means of interfering with the investigation.

    ” The fight against corruption is a collective responsibility, everybody is a partner. Let’s join hands and fight corruption”, Mr Aliyu said

  • EFCC urges court to revoke Metuh’s bail

    EFCC urges court to revoke Metuh’s bail

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission(EFCC), the prosecuting agency in the ongoing trial of former Peoples Democratic Party( PDP) spokesman, Olisah Metuh, has urged the court to revoke Metuh’s bail.

    Mr Sylvanus Tahir, counsel to the EFCC, who made the application at the resumption of hearing of the matter on Tuesday at the Federal High Court, Abuja, said Metuh should be remanded in prison.

    Tahir said the application was based on the grounds that Metuh had breached the terms of the bail granted him by the court, by being absent in court for two days with no cogent reason.

    The prosecutor asked the court to discountenance the submissions of the defence as to why Metuh was absent in court.

    “Since the defendant has been absent from court for two days for inexplicable reasons, and bearing in mind that the defendant is enjoining the bail of the court and has undermined the purpose of the bail.

    “The prosecution is constrained to apply for the revocation of the bail pursuant to Sections 137(b) and 169 of the Administration of Criminal Justice.

    ” We urge the court to revoke the bail and commit the defendant to prison pending the determination of his case.”

    He further told the court that he was vehemently opposed to the application to vacate the days already fixed for trial and adjourn to the next dates convenient for the court.

    On the said medical report sent to the court by Dr. O.C. Ekweugwu of the Nnamdi Azikiwe Universiry Teaching Hospital, Anambra, the prosecutor said there was nothing before the court to prove the authenticity of the letter.

    “The letter ought to have come by way of an affidavit, but nobody has deposed to an oath verifying the worth of the so called medical report, rather the report was just dumped in the court.”

    He further submitted that it was of no purpose for the defence to ask the court to order an investigation to ascertain the veracity of the medical report.

    Mr Onyeachi Ikpeazu (SAN), counsel to Metuh, had in his submission, prayed the court to vacate the earlier dates the court had fixed for the trial and fix fresh dates in the interest of justice.

    Ikpeazu urged the court to grant the application on the grounds that his client was currently in hospital undergoing treatment for a spine related illness.

    He further submitted that being a criminal case, it was mandatory for his client to be in court since it was against the law to proceed with the matter in the absence of his client.

    Mr Tochukwu Onwubufor (SAN), counsel to the second defendant in the matter said that he aligned himself with the submissions of Ikpeazu.

    Onwubufor, however, added that there was substantial reason for Metuh’s absence in court.

    “There is a letter from the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi, Anambra stating the medical condition of the first defendant.”

    On the question of the authenticity of the report and whether the person who signed it was indeed a medical doctor, the counsel asked the court for time to investigate.

    Justice Okon Abang said the court noted that there was no proof before the court to show that the person who issued the letter was a medical doctor or an employee of the hospital.

    Abang added that the hospital was not a party in the matter and that the person who issued the letter was not in court to testify.

    He further wondered how the said letter found its way into the court records.

    He adjourned the matter until Jan. 24 for continuation of arguments by counsel.

  • Ex-commissioner urges EFCC to probe Fayose’s projects

    Ex-commissioner urges EFCC to probe Fayose’s projects

    •‘Flyover, market built with Fed funds’

    A former Ekiti State Commissioner for Finance and Economic Development, Mr. Dapo Kolawole, has urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to probe some projects executed by Governor Ayo Fayose.

    Kolawole said the anti-graft agency should investigate the Ikere township road project, which he said was meant to be dualised from the town to Iju, a boundary town with Ondo State.

    He said former Governor Kayode Fayemi’s administration, which he served, had paid N1.3 billion mobilisation fee for the project, while the Fayose administration restricted construction to Ikere township.

    The dualisation of the road to Ondo State boundary, according to him, was awarded to China Railway 3 Construction Company, which Fayose allegedly drove away for Kopek Construction Limited.

    The commissioner urged the EFCC to probe what happened to the N1.3 billion Fayemi paid and how Fayose started work “without the approval of the House of Assembly, led by Dr. Adewale Omirin”.

    Kolawole, who addressed reporters yesterday in Ado-Ekiti, the staqte capital, said the Ado-Ekiti Flyover and the new Oja Oba Market projects were executed with funds from the Federal Government and not with Ekiti State funds, as Fayose reportedly claimed.

    Reacting to the recommendation of the state government’s White Paper, which slammed a 10-year ban on him and Fayemi from holding public offices, Kolawole described the ban as a “sacrilege”.

    According to him, there is need to react to Fayose’s allegations and debunk the government’s claims – to put the records straight “in the interest of Ekiti people”.

    He also debunked Fayose’s claim that Fayemi left a debt of N85 billion, an allegation he said was contrary to Ekiti’s official record of financial statement.

    The ex-commissioner said the Fayemi regime left a debt of N30 billion and N17 billion in the state treasury.

    Kolawole also revealed that the Fayose administration used Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND) to finance the construction of the Funmi Olayinka Women Development Centre located in Fajuyi area of Ado-Ekiti.

    He said the project was supposed to be sited on the campus of Ekiti State University (EKSU) and not at the present location and the money for its construction belongs to the Federal Government.

    On the alleged 17 missing vehicles, Kolawole said no vehicle was missing as stated in the affidavit of Coscharis Motors before the Judicial Panel of Inquiry

    Kolawole said: “Fayose has written for reimbursement on Ado-Ifaki Road, Ikere dualisation on which Fayemi paid N1.3 billion mobilisation fee and approved by the Tenders Board.

    “I am calling on the EFCC, Debt Management Office and Federal Ministry of Finance to investigate these as contained in the financial statement of Ekiti State.

    “Fayose collected more revenue from the Federal Government than Fayemi, let them come and investigate Ikere-Iju Road.

    The dualisation is supposed to be from African Church Comprehensive High School at Ikere and stretch to Iju. Where has the N1.3 billion paid by Fayemi gone? We want to know the whereabouts of the N1.3 billion.

    “The financial advisor advised that he (Fayose) keeps remitting the funds, has the government of the day listened to the financial advisor.

    “The Oba’s Market has started (before we left government) and if they say it has not started, then they are ignorant.”

    On the ten-year ban, Kolawole said: “The ban will not hold, legally we have not committed any offence but Fayose has committed sacrilege.

    “I have a Father who can ban in Nigeria, who can ban in other parts of the country and who can ban in any part of the world.

    “Fayose is just entertaining Nigeria with his laughable ban. He cannot ban me and my boss, Dr Fayemi because he lacks the power. Fayose is treating the whole world to a meal of comedy.”

     

  • ‘EFCC lacks courage to go after govt’s allies’

    ‘EFCC lacks courage to go after govt’s allies’

     Dr. Ali Ahmad is the Kwara State House of Assembly Speaker. He was  chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Justice and Human Rights. He was one of those who pushed for the passage of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA). In this interview with Legal Editor JOHN AUSTIN UNACHUKWU,  Ahmad  speaks on the challenges of lawmaking, the ACJA, prosecution of corruption cases, and sundry issues.

    You have been Speaker of the Kwara State House of Assembly for almost two years now. What has the experience been like?

    It has been so rewarding, although the challenges from the national legislative items are different from those of the states. You still confront those things that  are  affecting every legislature in Nigeria. In Nigeria, the political system has not reconciled itself fully with the legislature. Nigerians are not used to the legislature, even the political elite. They are used to one man bossing it out. Perhaps from the military mentality, they want a strong person bossing it out from the Executive. So anything the legislature does to checkmate that strong man, people look at it and say ‘ah, who are you?’, not knowing that the legislature is the bulwark that protects the people from the tyranny of a possible strong leader that may emerge.

    Why did you push for the passage of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) when you were Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Justice and Human Rights? And have you adopted it in Kwara State?

    The ACJA 2015 is a watershed law in the administration of Criminal justice in the country. When the legislative work was going on, I had no doubt in my mind that it would change the legal landscape. That wouldn’t have been passed without the collaboration of the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary. The then Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Miriam Alooma Mukhtar (NCJN) ‘donated’ Justice Ishaq Bello, the now Chief Judge of the  FCT High Court. She said: ‘I have donated this man to represent the judiciary in the legislative process.’ In the Executive, we had the Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Bello Adoke ( SAN) who was informed of every little changes in  the Act. The bill didn’t spend more than three hours in the Villa before it was signed into law by  President.

    Why?

    Because the Executive and Judiciary were fully aware of the legislative process. It was fully followed by everybody, so when we sent it to the President for his assent, three hours later  the Attorney-General called and said, ‘your bill has been signed into law’. It is a 400-clause bill; it has never happened in Nigeria. But we still have a very long way to go because the ACJA applies to Federal Courts, though there are some States that have passed it but that is not the issue.

    What is the issue?

    The issue is that we should not relent until every state in Nigeria has passed it into law.  For now less than 10 states have passed the ACJA. One should not just rest until all the 36 States of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory have passed  it into law.  I am aware that the Attorneys-General conference is  saying that they have issues here and there,  but may be the legislature would just go ahead and bypass the Attorneys-General because if we finish this eight assembly without passing the law, that will not be good, we would have failed. I call on anybody that has interest in this unification of our Criminal Procedure Codes to please appeal to our Attorneys-General so that each state would have this law.

    How can we improve the ease of doing business in Nigeria?

    I was very happy to read a few weeks ago that two laws passed by the Senate are  already assisting the economy, including the Secured Credit Act. As a result of those two Acts, banks are now ready to give loans to small businesses.  I know the Senate President and the Vice- President; they are concerned about how Nigeria can achieve high grade about the ease of doing business. They have to do more so that exiting from the recession will be sustained and then we will be on our way to economic recovery.

    The government has threatened to criminalise  hate speeches. What is your reaction to this?

    I have heard those things, some people even said that hate speeches are covered in some existing legislations in the country.  But if they have been covered and they are still flowing, that means that there is a flaw in the land. So law should respond to realities, we should look at the existing laws, look at how they are and then tie the hate speeches. For me the laws on hate speeches are not working as they should. You don’t have freedom of hate speech, what you have is the freedom of speech and even that is not absolute, so there is nowhere in the world that you have freedom of hate speech. Yes, you have your tongue, you have the freedom to use it but you will be responsible for how you use it.

    What laws has the Kwara State House of Assembly passed since you became Speaker?

    As you pointed out, we should use law for development. What is critical to Nigeria now is the economy. So, one of the critical laws that the Kwara State House of Assembly has passed is the Infrastructure Finance Law. We were of the view that projects are abandoned because contractors do not have access to funds and governments do not have the funds to give to contractors to complete their jobs.

    We said we would create a pool and the government would be paying money into it. From there, they will be paid. This we have done and we have seen the benefits. Kwara State has local contractors, and this law has actually helped our economy in no small measure. You will see that Kwara State government does not owe salaries.

    Which other critical legislation has been passed?

    We have passed so many laws but I just brought out this particular one to showcase the fact that you pass laws to address specific economic challenges. We also passed a law to ammend  the Anti-cultism law because we found out that Kwara is a state of harmony and that cultists are trying to over run it. The previous law restricted cultism to universities but now,  you see that barbers are cultists, drivers are cultists. So, we had to take the old out and say, anybody, a student or not, who is found out to be a cultist, shall be punished. We increased the punishment to deter people from engaging in cultism or cult activities. This has helped us and the incidence of cultism has subsided.

    Many people have attributed the loss of high profile cases by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC) to loopholes in the EFCC Act. Others blame it on poor investigation. How can the anti-corruption war be strengthened?

    We are just being lucky at the few successes that we are recording. It is  just like the toddler that is learning to walk. He takes a few steps and falls down. Because it is not a planned and well strategized issue that we are seeing here, we just wake up and go and if we are right we do it but if we are wrong so be it. EFCC  today is not different from the way it operated during the administration of President Umar Yar’Adua, during President Goodluck Jonathan or President Olusegun Obasanjo regimes. There is indeed no remarkable difference in their modus oparandi. Then the EFCC would be unleashed on you if the government believes that you are anti-government; that is the same thing that is happening today. The EFCC does not have the liver to confront any who is close to or a friend of the government in power. I have not seen that; it has never happened in the history of the EFCC that it confronted, arrested or prosecuted anybody who is a friend of the Federal Government. I have studied the EFCC over the years and there is nothing like that. EFCC is always unleashed on the so called enemies of the government.

    It has not changed a bit. That is what used to happen in Singapore until they insulated their equivalent of the EFCC from the government and it became independent. That is why Singapore made progress in its anti -corruption fight. May be we should ammend the law and put ‘independent’ before its name. May it will help if we call it ‘Independent EFCC’.

    How can this be done?

    We can give them independence if they believe that they are not independent. But you see, they do not believe it. They believe that they are independent but they are not, so if a person doesn’t know his problems, that is a big  problem. If you know your problem, then it is half solved but the EFCC does not know its problems; they don’t believe that they are not independent but people outside know, because if you are independent, your friend, your enemies, the people you like, the ones you don’t like will know that you are independent. In this instance, it only the EFCC that believes that it is independent but those who suffer from its irrationality, those who suffer from its biased treatment, will tell you that it is not. They confront EFCC with the facts that this person is corrupt, this one is corrupt but the EFCC cannot do anything about them.

    What is your message to Kwarans?

    My massage is that they should keep supporting us. They have supported us hitherto and that is why we have this tremendous goodwill among the people. We have tremendous support from the people, that is why we are succeeding. People have poured accolades on Kwarar State House of Assembly. We are not doing anything special, just doing our job. It is just the support of people; we want them to keep supporting us while we keep delivering on our statutory mandate of making laws for the peace, order and good governance of the state.

  • Former minister, two others arraigned for N450m fraud

    Former minister, two others arraigned for N450m fraud

    Former minister for water resources, Serah Ocheme and two other public office holders from Plateau state were arraigned before the federal high court Jos following a suit by the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC).

    The anti- grant agency is accusing the suspects of receiving and laundering the sum of N450 million which they allegedly received from former minister of petroleum resource Alison Dieseni-Madueke in 2015.

    Alison Madueke was arraigned together with former acting chairman of People’s Democratic Party (PDP) Plateau State Chapter Chief Raymond Dabo and Plateau state campaign coordinator of 2015 Goodluck Jonathan, Evangelist Leo-Sunday Jatau.

    The trio were charged for money laundering and conspiracy for receiving the sum of N450 million through a Nigerian based commercial bank which was eventually laundered.

    When the case was mentioned at the federal high court Jos yesterday, the three accused pleaded not guilty to charges.

    The Federal High Court sitting in Jos the Plateau State capital however granted them bail on condition of self recognition.

    After arguments by both the counsels of the parties, the counsel to the defendants,Barrister Sunday Odey said that all the three accused persons filed for the bail application and requested the court to grant his clients bail based on self recognition.

    The Prosecuting counsel, A.Y Manchata didn’t object the request for the court to grant the bail.

    The judge presiding the case, Justice Musa Kurya granted the defendants bail following their formal application before adjourning the case to 13th and 14th February, 2018 for hearing.

  • EFCC calls more witnesses in Kalu’s trial

    EFCC calls more witnesses in Kalu’s trial

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, called its sixth witness in ongoing trial of former Abia Governor, Orji Uzor Kalu, at a Federal High Court in Lagos.

    EFCC had on Oct. 31, 2016, preferred 34 count charges bordering on N3.2 billion alleged fraud against Kalu and his former Commissioner for Finance, Ude Udeogo.

    Also charged is a company, Slok Nig. Ltd.

    The accused had pleaded not guilty to the charges and were granted bail.

    When trial resumed on Monday, the prosecutor, Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), called the witness, Mr Braimoh Yakubu, an Internal Control Officer with Guaranty Trust Bank.

    Led in evidence, Yakubu told the court that he had been a Regional Coordinator of the bank since 2005.

    He said that his schedule of duty included investigation of fraud and irregularities, listening to customers’ complaints as well as acting as a liaison officer.

    Giving his narration on events in 2007, the witness told the court that the EFCC wrote a letter to his bank, requesting for account opening documents of the third accused, Slok.

    He said that the account opening documents of Slok were retrieved and forwarded to the commission.

    Presented with the documents, the witness identified them as the same sent to the commission by the bank as ordered.

    But counsel to Slok, Mr C.C. Nwofor (SAN), raised objection to the admissibility of the document on grounds that it contained some other document not emanating from GT Bank.

    According to him, some of the documents sought to be tendered emanated from other banks and so, the witness cannot testify on them since he is not its maker.

    Other defence counsels also aligned themselves with Nwofor’s objection.

    However, in a bench ruling, Justice Mohammed Idris overruled the objection of the defence counsel and held that such objection only went to the weight to be attached to such document.

    Accordingly, the court admitted and marked the documents as exhibits.

    Under cross-examination, counsel to Kalu, Mr Awa Kalu (SAN), sought confirmation from the witness that he had been working at GT Bank since 2005 and the witness replied in the affirmative.

    To further question by the defence counsel, Yakubu said that he obtained his masters degree between 2008 and 2010.

    Justice Idris adjourned until Jan. 23 for continuation of trial.

    In the charge, the accused were alleged to have committed the offence between August, 2001 and October, 2005.

    Kalu was alleged to have utilised his company to retain in the account of a First Inland Bank, now First City Monument Bank, the sum of N200 million.

    The sum is alleged to have formed part of funds illegally derived from the coffers of Abia Government.

    In one of the counts, the third accused (Slok Nig. Ltd) and one Emeka Abone, who is said to be at large, were also alleged to have retained in the company’s account the sum of N200 million on behalf of the first accused.

    In counts one to 10, the accused were alleged to have retained about N2.5 billion in different accounts, the funds which were said to belong to the state government.

    Cumulatively, in all the counts, the accused were alleged to have diverted over N3.2 billion from the Abia Government’s treasury during Kalu’s tenure as governor between 1999 and 2007.

    The offence is said to have contravened the provisions of sections 15(6), 16, and 21 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2005.

    It is also said to have contravened the provisions of the Money Laundering Act of 1995 as amended by the amendment Act No.9 of 2002 and section 477 of the Criminal Code Act, Laws of the Federation, 1990.

     

  • Ex-commissioner urges EFCC to investigate Fayose’s projects

    Ex-commissioner urges EFCC to investigate Fayose’s projects

    Former Commissioner for Finance and Economic Development in Ekiti State, Mr. Dapo Kolawole, has urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) to investigate some projects being executed by the state Governor, Ayo Fayose.

    Kolawole said the anti-graft agency should investigate the Ikere township road project in the state.

    He said the administration of former Governor Kayode Fayemi, in which he served, had paid N1.3 billion mobilization fee only for the Fayose administration to restrict construction to Ikere township.

    He said the dualisation of the road to Ondo State boundary was awarded to China Railway 3 Construction Company but the firm was allegedly driven away by Fayose for Kopek Construction Limited.

    The ex-commissioner urged EFCC to investigate what happened to the N1.3 billion paid by Fayemi and how Fayose started work “without the approval of the House of Assembly led by Dr. Adewale Omirin.”

    Kolawole, who spoke at a news conference in Ado-Ekiti on Monday, said the Ado-Ekiti Flyover and the new Oja Oba Market projects, were being executed with funds from the Federal Government.

    Kolawole also described the government’s 10-year ban on him and Fayemi as a “sacrilege.