Tag: EFCC

  • EFCC seeks permanent forfeiture of ex-Naval chief’s N1.8b

    EFCC seeks permanent forfeiture of ex-Naval chief’s N1.8b

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday urged Justice Muslim Hassan of the Federal High Court in Lagos to order the permanent forfeiture of N1.8billion recovered from a former Chief of Naval Staff, Dele Joseph Ezeoba.
    The court had on March 16 ordered the temporary forfeiture to the Federal Government of N1,825,000,000 allegedly diverted fraudulently by Ezeoba.
    It followed an application by EFCC, which said the money was traced to the account of a company, Aquila Leasing Limited.
    The commission said Ezeoba agreed in his statement to EFCC to forfeit the money.
    It said Ezeoba allegedly used the name of Chukwuka Onwuchekwa to open a fraudulent account while he (Ezeoba) was the one who “truly” laundered the money.
    EFCC said the former Naval Chief stated in his statement that the account was opened with Onwuchekwas consent while he (Ezeoba) managed it.
    “The money is proceed of crime fraudulently diverted from the Nigerian Navy under the leadership of Dele Joseph Ezeoba.
    “Neither the signature used in opening the account nor the drivers license used in opening the account is his,” the commission said.
    Justice Hassan had said anyone who does not want the money to be permanently forfeited should appear in court within 14 days.
    The judge ordered EFCC to publish the order in a newspaper to make interested parties aware of it.
    Yesterday, EFCCs lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, said the judges order had been published, adding that he had filed an application for the moneys permanent forfeiture.
    Acquila Leasing and Onwuchekwas lawyer, Mr. Paschal Madu, did not oppose the application.
    He said his clients did not commit any fraud, and that Ezeoba, while giving them the money to buy shares for him, claimed it was his savings over the years.
    Madu said: “The action of the first respondent (Acquila Leasing) is one of those actions that this country should commend.
    “We do not oppose the application by the EFCC; our affidavit supports it but we just want it to be noted that the respondent acted patriotically, in good faith and to its utmost best in the love of the fatherland. We want to commend the EFCC; they are doing a very diligent job.”
    Oyedepo said in view of the respondents admission, the money should be permanently forfeited.
    “I submit that no further proof is needed to make a final order forfeiting the sum of N1.8billion to the Federal Government,” Oyedepo said.
    He praised Madu for cooperating with the commission.
    “He is the first lawyer that I have seen who will ask his client to come to the EFCC’s office and say, ‘Tell them the truth’. We also commend his client for taking his legal advice,” Oyedepo said.
    Justice Hassan adjourned till April 6 for ruling.

  • EFCC to establish anti-graft desks in foreign missions

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday said it would set up anti-corruption desks in Nigerian foreign missions to fast-track tracing, recovery and repatriation of looted funds stashed abroad.

    The Acting Chairman of the commission, Mr. Ibrahim Magu, stated this at a five-day induction programme for the 45 non-career ambassadors-designate in Abuja.

    Magu said EFCC operatives and other law enforcement agencies would be deployed to the Nigerian missions abroad starting with United States, United Komgdom, France, Italy, Switzerland, South Africa and Ghana.

    The EFCC chief expressed the belief that the move would complement the efforts of the government in the fight against corruption and recovery of looted funds.

    He said, “To enhance international cooperation in the fight against corruption, we will propose the establishment of EFCC desk, with our operatives deployed to collaborate with other law enforcement agencies in our foreign missions.

    “They will assist in the investigation of crimes bordering on money laundering, cyber- crimes, advance fee fraud and issues relating to asset recovery.

    “We can start with the posting of officers to U.S., UK, France, Italy, Switzerland, South Africa and Ghana in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”

    Magu expressed concern that asset recovery process was time consuming, complex and required a great deal of resources, expertise and political will.

    He said the process that included tracing, freezing, confiscation and repatriation, presented unique challenges, rooted in international relations and diplomacy.

    NAN

     

  • EFCC invited ex-NIMASA DG’s daughter for interrogation – Witness

    EFCC invited ex-NIMASA DG’s daughter for interrogation – Witness

    The Federal High Court, Lagos, heard on Tuesday that the children of a former acting Director General of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Haruna Jauro, including his six-year old daughter, were invited for interrogation by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    A subpoenaed witness, Mr. Peter Achuneni, who is a lawyer, gave the evidence at the resumed trial-within-trial of Jauro.

    EFCC charged the NIMASA DG alongside Dauda Bawa and Thlumbau Enterprises Limited on 19- count charge of N304.1 million fraud.

    Justice Mojisola Olatoregun had ordered a trial-within-trial after Jauro claimed his statements were not made voluntarily.

    The witness, led in evidence by Jauro’s lawyer, Olalekan Ojo, said he represented Jauro during investigation at the EFCC.

    The witness told the court that at the commission, he introduced himself to an operative of the EFCC, Mr. Chukwuma Orji, who later detailed one of his subordinates to take the first accused to a table for interrogation.

    Achuneni said an asset declaration form was also given to the accused to fill, adding that as lawyer, he attempted severally to approach the accused at the table, but he was asked to return back to the gallery where visitors were seated.

    The witness told the court that after observing disappointment on the face of the accused, (his client at that time), he again attempted for the second and third time to approach the table where he was being interrogated.

    He said following his persistent attempt, the EFCC operative (Orji), warned him again to go away or risk been joined alongside the accused.

    Achuneni  said Orji later asked him to endorse the accused statement, adding that he was present when it was taken and all went well.

  • EFCC ‘should arrest Adoke, Etete, others’

    EFCC ‘should arrest Adoke, Etete, others’

    A Federal High Court judge in Abuja has advised the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to deploy its arresting powers to produce before the court those indicted in the controversial $1.1 billion Oil Prospecting Licence (OPL) 245 transaction (also known as the Malabu Oil deal).

    Justice John Tsoho gave the advice yesterday when EFCC counsel Jonson Ojogbane made a request for direction when two of the three charges the commission filed in relation to the Malabu Oil deal were mentioned.

    The first of the charges was filed on December 21, last year. There are nine defendants, including former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Bello Adoke (SAN).

    Others are former Minister of Petroleum Dan Etete, Aliyu Abubakar, Malabu Oil & Gas Ltd, Rocky Top Resource Ltd, Imperial Union Ltd, Novel Properties & Dev. Co. Ltd, Group Construction Ltd and Megatech Engineering Ltd.

    The second charge filed on March 2, has Adoke and Abubakar (of AA Oil) as defendants.

    The second charge was first mentioned yesterday. The defendants were neither in court, nor represented by lawyers.

    Ojogbane announced his appearance for the prosecution. He said the prosecution was not yet able to effect personal service of the charge on the defendants.

    He sought the court’s direction on whether or not to apply orally or by way of a motion for arrest warrants against the defendants.

    Ojogbane said: “We are yet to serve the defendants in this case. We have been unable to serve them, particularly, the first defendant (Adoke). We are told he is outside the country.

    “I will appreciate if my lord can guide me. I actually want to make an application for arrest warrant against defendants.”

    Citing Section 35 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), Ojogbane said: “My lord, I wish to be guided about the procedure. I want to know if I can apply orally or file a motion.”

    Justice Tsoho replied: “You can’t apply orally. My understanding of the law is that until you arraign anybody, you cannot make an order of arrest against the person.

    “If a defendant has been arraigned and he is not coming for trial, the court can issue arrest warrant against such person.

    “The prosecution can use its coercive powers under the law to arrest a defendant to answer to the charges pending against them.”

    Ojogbane explained that he required the warrant to begin extradition proceedings against the defendants, who are overseas.

    His logic is that with the cooperation of the AGF Office, the INTERPOL will facilitate the arrest of the defendants, if  a warrant is attached to all the documents to be sent to the foreign authorities.

    Justice Tsoho, who was not persuaded by Ojogbane’s explanation, stated that with or without an arrest warrant, extradition proceedings could be initiated.

    Realising that the judge was unwilling to grant his request, Ojogbane sought an adjournment to enable the prosecution take further steps to bring the defendants  to court.

    When the other charge was called, similar scenario played out. Justice Tsoho adjourned till June 13 for arraignment.

    The third charge is before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). There are 11 defendants.

    They are Adoke, Etete, Shell, Agip,  Eni,  Aliyu Abubakar (of AA Oil Ltd), Malabu Oil and Gas Ltd.

    Others are a director of Shell, Ralph Wetzels and three Italian directors of Agip Exploration Ltd – Casula Roberto, Putatti Stefeno and Burrafato Sebastiano.

    The defendants are charged with conspiracy and official corruption in relation to their alleged acceptance of $801 million from the oil companies in relation to the grant of OPL 245.

  • Perm Sec arraigned over ‘non-declaration’ of N97.3m

    Perm Sec arraigned over ‘non-declaration’ of N97.3m

    Justice Babs Kuewumi of the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday ordered that a Permanent Secretary in Ministry of Labour and Productivity, Dr. Illoh Clement, be remanded in prison.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arraigned the permanent secretary for not declaring some of his hidden cash assets.

    The commission said he failed to declare N97, 300,613.44, $139,575.50 and £10,121.52 found in three of his bank accounts.

    EFCC, in the three-count charge, said Clement “warehoused” the monies into his three First Bank Plc accounts on April 19 last year.

    Prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, said the defendant acted contrary to Section 27 (3)(c) of the EFCC (Establishment) Act 2004.

    Clement pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    Justice Kuewumi granted him bail in the sum of N50million with one surety in like sum.

    The surety must be a Lagos resident, must depose to an affidavit of means and must show evidence of three years’ tax clearance.

    Clement was ordered to deposit his passport with the court until the case is decided.

    Justice Kuewumi ordered that the defendant be remanded in EFCC custody until he meets his bail terms.

    Oyedepo said the prosecution was ready to open its case, which he said was straight-forward, adding that he bought two witnesses to court

  • PDP senators ’didn’t accuse Tinubu, EFCC of conspiracy’

    PDP senators ’didn’t accuse Tinubu, EFCC of conspiracy’

    The Senate Caucus of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) yesterday denied reports that it accused All Progressives Congress (APC) stalwart Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu of colluding with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to harass its members in the upper chamber.

    A national daily, ThisDay, yesterday published as its lead story: “PDP Caucus Accuses Tinubu, EFCC of Conspiracy to Destroy Senate”. In the story, the newspaper claimed that the Senate Caucus of the opposition party alleged at a meeting convened by its leadership at the weekend that Tinubu was conniving with the EFCC to harass senators.

    But it was learnt last night that the Senate Caucus had not met in the last three weeks.

    Besides, a source said the caucus never discussed Tinubu at any of its previous meetings, the last of which was held to receive the report of the Governor Seriake Dickson-led PDP Reconciliation Committee.

    The source listed Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu, Senate Minority Leader Godswill Akpabio, House of Representatives Minority Leader Leo Ogor and others as some of the PDP leaders in the National Assembly that attended the Caucus’ last meeting.

    It blamed the newspaper report as the handiwork of mischief makers, adding that the PDP should not be identified with it.

    Also yesterday, the caucus washed its hands of the report through its South East Caucus Leader in the Senate, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, who said that the caucus did not at any time discuss Tinubu at any meeting.

    Abaribe said: “It is far from the truth. We did not at any time discuss Senator Tinubu (Bola) at our meeting and nobody accused the EFCC of anything.”

    The Abia South senator noted that the PDP Senate Caucus would not descend to the level of attacking individuals or institutions for the sake of vendetta.

    The report linking the PDP Senate caucus, he said, should be disregarded.

    The EFCC is probing a former Heritage Bank Executive Director, Mr. Robert Mbonu, three aides of Senate President Bukola Saraki and three others on how N3.5 billion believed to be part of the Paris Club loan refund was wired into some accounts.

    The cash is said to be part of the N19 billion allegedly diverted from the N522.74 billion initial refund to states.

    Others believed to be on the EFCC radar are: Melrose General Services Limited, the Relationship Manager to the Senate President, Kathleen Erhimu, Obiora Amobi, the Deputy Chief of Staff to the Senate President, Gbenga Peter Makanjuola, Mr. Kolawole Shittu and Oladapo Joseph Idowu.

    The probe, a source said last night, may have sparked anxiety in the Senate President’s camp – a development which the ThisDay report “is battling to divert attention from”.

  • Magu’s fate: Buhari seeks legal advice

    Magu’s fate: Buhari seeks legal advice

    •Senate awaits communication from Osinbajo’s team

    President Muhammadu Buhari has opted to seek legal opinions in deciding what to make of Mr. Ibrahim Magu, following the latest refusal of the Senate to confirm him as substantive chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The legal consultations will form an integral part of the planned peace talks between government’s mediation team headed by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and National Assembly leaders.

    The Federal Executive Council constituted the team recently to interface with the NASS leadership with a view to resolving the differences between the two arms.

    The Nation gathered yesterday that the Osinbajo-led team was yet to contact the National Assembly leaders.

    Authoritative sources said yesterday that Buhari had called for advice on the import of Section 171 of 1999 Constitution which is the bone of contention on the fate of Magu.

    The Section says:  (1) “Power to appoint persons to hold or act in the offices to which this section applies and to remove persons so appointed from any such office shall rest in the President.

    (2) The offices to which this section applies are namely.

    (a) Secretary to the Government of the Federation.

    (b) Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

    (c) Ambassador, High Commissioner or other principal Representative of Nigeria abroad.

    (d) Permanent Secretary in any Ministry or Head of any Extra-Ministerial Department of the Government of the Federation howsoever designated; and

    (e) any office on the personal staff of the President.

    (3) An appointment to the office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation shall not be made except from among the Permanent Secretaries or equivalent rank in the Civil Service of the Federation or of a State.

    (4) An appointment to the office of Ambassador, High Commissioner, or other Representative of Nigeria abroad shall not have effect unless the appointment is confirmed by the Senate.

    (5) In exercising his powers of appointment under this section, the President shall have regard to the federal character of Nigeria and the need to promote national unity.

    (6) Any appointment made pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (e) of subsection (2) of this section shall be at the pleasure of the President and shall cease when the President ceases to hold office;

    “Provided that where a person has been appointed from a public service of the Federation or a State, he shall be entitled to return to the public service of the Federation or of the State when the President ceases to hold office.”

    Section 11 of the Interpretation Act says:   (1)   “Where an enactment confers a power to appoint a person either to an office or to exercise any functions, whether for a specified period or not, the power includes-

    (a)  power to appoint a person by name or to appoint the holder from time to time of a particular office;

    (b)  power to remove or suspend him;

    (c)  power, exercisable in the manner and subject to the limitations and conditions (if any) applicable to the power to appoint,-

    (i)   to reappoint or reinstate him,

    (ii)   to appoint a person to act in his place, either generally or in regard to specified functions, during such time as is considered expedient by the authority in whom the power of appointment in question is vested.

    (2)   ” A reference in an enactment to the holder of an office shall be construed as including a reference to a person for the time being appointed to act in his place, either as respects the functions of the office generally or the functions in regard to which he is appointed, as the case may be.”

    Prof. Itse Sagay’s Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) believes that by virtue of Section 171, Magu can continue to act as Acting EFCC chairman.

    The Department of State Security Service, some government officials and the Senate think otherwise.

    The Senate on Wednesday stopped the consideration of the 27 Resident Electoral Commissioners who were nominated by Buhari to protest Buhari’s refusal to sack Magu after it rejected him for a second time.

    A top level source said although  the President has stuck with Magu for now, those opposed to the EFCC acting chairman  are drawing attention to  Section 11 of the Interpretation Act in the constitution.

    The source said: “The President is being painstaking in taking a decision on Magu.

    “He has sought legal advice on the contentious Section 171 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 11 of the Interpretation Act.

    “The legal advice might either strengthen his position on Magu or determine what action to take. It will also assist him to engage the National Assembly leadership on Magu’s fate.

    “Buhari is aware of argument for and against the retention of Magu but he does not go by the spur of the moment because of posterity. He is aware of Magu’s impeccable contributions to anti-graft war. And on a personal note, he is with Magu.

    “He runs a peculiar presidency based on adherence to the rule of law and not Executive fiat as the case was in the past.”

    Another source said: “the President’s ultimate decision on Magu will have to take cognizance of the EFCC Establishment (2004) Act and the rejection of the officer by the Senate for the second time.

    “Apart from the law, some government officials prefer a political solution to the controversy on Magu. We are hopeful that Osinbajo’s mediation team will be able to resolve this issue amicably.

    “There is a dilemma before the President. He favours Magu for the job and he does not pretend about it. But he has to manage the anger of the Senate too.

    “The battle over Magu is now in the realm of legal technicality, especially his continued stay in office in Acting capacity. This is why the President needs sound legal advice, not jaundiced type.”

    The questions to be resolved are:

    * Can the President re-nominate Magu for the third time?

    * What becomes of Magu’s status in the light of his rejection for the EFCC job for the second time by the Senate?

    * Should Magu remain in office in Acting capacity as EFCC chairman until Buhari takes a decision or as long as it takes Buhari to decide his fate?

    *If Buhari does not re-nominate Magu for a third time, can he remain in Acting EFCC chairman till the end of Buhari’s tenure in 2019 in the light of the provision of Section 171 of the 1999 Constitution?

    A principal officer in the National Assembly said: “We are awaiting communication from the Vice President before we constitute our team which will meet with the mediation committee from the Executive.

    “Certainly, we are bound to disagree on issues in line with the principle of separation of powers but we are also expected to reach consensus for the betterment of the society at large.

    “We have issues with the interpretation if Section 171 of the 1999 Constitution.”

    Shortly after Magu’s last rejection, the Executive Secretary of PACAC, Prof. Bolaji Owasanoye, had told our correspondent that Magu can continue to serve in acting capacity.

    He said: “We believe that there is nothing inhibiting him from being in office as the Acting EFCC chairman. We are of the opinion that he should remain in office.

    “If you look at Section 171 of the 1999 Constitution, the President is empowered to retain him as long as he wants in acting capacity. As long as the President remains in office, Magu can continue to act as EFCC chairman.”

    Responding to a question, Owasanoye added: “If there is something new, we would have modified our position but the Senate acted on old report without considering the President’s points in the re-nomination letter.”

     

     

  • N10m gift: EFCC  files fresh charge  against ex -CJ

    N10m gift: EFCC files fresh charge against ex -CJ

    A fresh corruption charge now awaits the immediate past  Chief Judge of Enugu State, Justice Innocent Azubike Umezulike in court.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is accusing him of receiving N10million donation from a litigant before his court.

    The anti-graft agency claims that Umezulike conferred undue advantage on himself.

    The commission had on March 16 arraigned the former CJ before a Federal High Court in Port Harcourt over non-disclosure of assets.

    While the process was on, a key witness against Umezulike was arrested in Abuja and hauled before a court in Enugu for alleged forgery of a document.

    The intervention of the Attorney-General of Enugu State however saved the witness, Chibuike Jonathan Nnamoko from being sent to jail.

    The Enugu AG faulted the police for arraigning the witness for forgery in his jurisdiction without his knowledge or any case file.

    The fresh  charge filed against Umezulike by Kayode Oni, A.I. Arogha and Esin-Oti Ebipade, shows that: “The court is informed by the Executive Chairman, EFCC, on behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that Innocent Azubike Umezulike is charged with the following offence:

    “Use of office to confer corrupt or unfair advantage contrary to Section 19 of the Independent and Corrupt Practices and other Related Offence Act( Laws of the Federation) 2000.

    “Innocent Azubike Umezulike sometime February 2014 at Enugu within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court whilst being the Chief Judge, High Court of Justice, Enugu (a public officer) did use your position to confer unfair advantage upon yourself by inviting one Prince Arthur Eze, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Oranto Petroleum Limited, who was a litigant in pending and concluded civil matters to wit: suit No. E/388/2010: Prince Arthur Eze v Diamond Bank Plc and E/147/2012: Prince Arthur Eze v Major Concepts Limited respectively presided over by you to the launch of a book titled “ABC of contemporary land law in Nigeria”, authored by you, where the said Arthur Eze donated N10million only by a Fidelity Bank  Plc cheque drawn in the account of Oranto Petroleum Limited which you accepted and paid the said sum of N10million only into your Zenith Bank  Plc account number 1001189952 and thereby committed an offence.”

    A  Federal High Court in Enugu had placed an interim forfeiture order of a sum of N50 million belonging to Justice Umezulike in a Zenith Bank account.

    Prior to his trial, the National Judicial Council (NJC) under the chairmanship of the immediate past  Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mahmud Mohammed, had recommended him and Justice Mohammed Ladan Tsamiya of the Court of Appeal for compulsory retirement.

    The NJC also dismissed Justice Kabiru Auta with a directive that he should be handed over to the police in Kano for prosecution.

    An EFCC source, speaking on the arrest of witness Nnamoko said: “we got an intelligence report that he was arrested by some policemen for forgery and arraigned before a court in Enugu without the knowledge of the Attorney-General of the state.

    “The AG has however intervened by insisting on due process. He said the police should send its investigation report to his office and after considering all evidence, the state will advise as appropriate.

    “They were almost sending the witness to prison in order to intimidate him and withdraw from giving evidence. We are investigating those behind this.”

     

     

     

  • Senate, EFCC and Customs play cat and mouse

    Senate, EFCC and Customs play cat and mouse

    THE battle for supremacy and the ethical high ground between the Senate on the one hand and some appointees of the Muhammadu Buhari presidency on the other hand has been fierce, messy and troubling. But despite its troubling signposts, the battle is not what it seems on the surface. It portends something far more sinister and dangerous to the body politic. The senate, much more than the House of Representatives, is less bashful about fighting wars, any war, choosing the battleground no matter how irreverent, daring the public offensively, and playing brinkmanship with provocative adroitness. Nigerians, egged on by vocal commentators and civil society activists, seem to recognise and even conclude that the senate is less than altruistic in the ongoing combat. For now, the government side of the battle is exemplified and amplified by the ineffaceably cocksure Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) chairman, Ibrahim Magu, the sometimes coarse Nigerian Customs Service (NCS) comptroller-general, Hameed Ali, and the gruff and immense Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir David Lawal.

    On the surface, the war is about a pliant senate headed by Bukola Saraki, a senate alleged to be ethically challenged and imposing itself and its controversial moral code on both the presidency and the nation. Dr Saraki himself faces many investigations and court battles, and is assumed to be deploying the senate’s influence to pressure the presidency into soft-pedalling on the cases or sidestepping the investigations, or even stalemating the entire struggle. The particulars of the trouble Dr Saraki faces are doubtless troubling. There is the Code of Conduct Tribunal case in which he is accused of inaccurate declaration of assets; there is also the importation of a bullet proof jeep for his use that is mired in controversial payment of inaccurate duty leading to the seizure of the vehicle; and there is the newer and more damning case of N19bn allegedly siphoned from states’ share of the Paris Club refund and the N3.5bn reportedly traced to the senate president and some of his aides. There is, it seems, no respite for Dr Saraki, as his antagonists appear determined to thrust the knife deeper into his back. He faces an uphill battle convincing the country of his right ethical standing and bona fides.

    Ranged on the other side of the battle are the senate president’s three formidable enemies hamstrung by their own peculiar bureaucratic or ethical challenges. Mr Magu is condemned by the Department of State Service (DSS) as unfit for the post he is seeking confirmation. In an equally damning report which the Service has been reluctant to recant, Mr Magu stands convicted of cavorting in an ethical miasma of his own finding and making. It is obvious the senate wants him removed from his acting EFCC chairmanship because he is not letting up in traducing and harassing the senate’s leadership. Mr Ali drew the senate’s ire by defying the order to appear before them in customs uniform. This was a totally needless controversy that had little or nothing to do with the law or constitution. But it has become a tortuous struggle for dominance. On his own, Mr Lawal is embroiled in a more straightforward case of alleged abuse of office in which a company connected with him reportedly applied for and won a controversial contract meant to palliate the sufferings of internally displaced persons in Boko Haram’s blighted Northeast.

    The three men, together with the disputatious camps they belong to in the fractious Buhari presidency, are bonded by their sworn determination to make the senate either amenable to their wishes and the executive’s or at least unhorse Dr Saraki, their chief tormentor. Both the customs and the EFCC have thus begun a cat and mouse game with the senate. Dr Saraki’s aides, the EFCC threateningly announced, would be hauled in for interrogation over the N19bn illegally deducted from the states’ N522bn Paris Club loan refund, particularly the N3.5bn allegedly traced to the senate president and his aides. In addition to Mr Ali defying the senate over the uniform brouhaha, the Customs have also intensified their propaganda war against the upper legislative chamber by substantiating their allegations of customs duties evasion by the senate. Mr Lawal has been fairly reticent in recent times, but he had twice bad-temperedly defied the senate, sometimes using inflammatory words and declining their invitations to defend his actions.

    In the midst of the long-running battle between the executive and the senate, a battle that has led to paralysis over the confirmation of 27 Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs), the Federal Executive Council (FEC) has wisely constituted a committee to mediate a truce or, more appropriately, seek ways to placate the obviously angry senate. The mediation group is headed by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo. Government spokesman, Information and Culture minister, Lai Mohammed, acknowledged that democracy was bound to manifest the kind of struggles the country was witnessing between the executive and the legislature. It is part of the learning curve to find a balance between the powers and responsibilities of all the arms of government, he says. But after waiting until positions ossified so dangerously, it is not clear how the mediation group hopes to engender peace, especially after some government functionaries have joined the fray and spoken exasperatingly of the senate’s leadership style and role in the misunderstanding.

    Hopefully, a peace deal can be brokered. Last year, going by the executive’s desire to win every argument against the senate and the judiciary, and given the injurious manner the sentimental discourse was framed, many observers began to fear that the struggle had become a zero-sum game where one of the parties simply had to lose for the other to win. In fact, at a point, the country came dangerously close to being worked up to overthrow what Nigerians concluded was a decadent and retrogressive National Assembly. There was no attempt to separate the National Assembly’s controversial and unpopular principal officers from the legislature as an institution.

    Worse, and more depressingly, there was no attempt to anticipate how the chain reaction would end once the instigated public marched on the National Assembly. Not only was the executive wholly incapable of framing their arguments and position in the inspiring and lofty terms of the finest principles of democracy, the public also carelessly glossed over the unhidden fact that the presidency was no longer in the hands of the man elected to preside over the affairs of the country. The new jingoistic and usurpatory cabal, part ethnically bigoted and part religiously extremist, was more obsessed with the destructive materialism of power than its utilitarian relevance for democracy, good governance, and unity and stability. Years of experience with instability since 1966, when disaffection with one government did not necessarily lead to a better replacement, had apparently not taught the public the virtue of patience and moderation.

    The Federal Executive Council is right to seek an understanding and settlement with the senate. This is not an indication of weakness, desperation or subservience. It is a manifestation of strength and wisdom, the kinds that have eluded a large section of the public. In a matter of years, the current principal officers of the National Assembly will vacate their seats, and possibly the legislature entirely. But that institution will remain. It is in the interest of democracy and the freedoms the constitution has so elegantly vouchsafed and guaranteed that the legislature must be guarded and helped to retain its relevance and influence, despite the obvious failings of many of its leaders. Members of the cabinet and heads of government agencies and civil society activists who have spoken unguardedly and emotively about the legislature, and are campaigning for its abrogation or occupation, are confused.

    The senate’s principal officers, particularly Dr Saraki, has acted sensibly but purely accidentally in defending the legislature’s powers and influence. Why in the same vein he is unable to grasp the fundamental fact that he fouls the dignity of that hallowed chamber by his unconscionable and unethical private and public moral codes, not to say unending court battles, is hard to explain. Can he make amends? It is doubtful. For as the Nigerian society and democracy are currently structured along obsessively materialistic lines, it is difficult for exemplar politicians, the kind Nigerians crave, to win public office. The country must therefore look beyond Dr Saraki and his coterie of tragicomedian supporters. The legislature must be defended in order for it to serve as a bulwark against the increasing predilection of the Buhari presidency for dictatorship. After the legislature has been secured, then Nigerians must take up the onerous task of filling its hallowed seats with qualified and ethical lawmakers. Enough of the sentimental, reactive and uninformed approach.

    The rapprochement begun by FEC must be encouraged, and the near unschooled defiance of Messrs Magu, Ali and Lawal must not be allowed to take root if Nigerian democracy is not to become malformed and endangered. Indeed, all this trouble could have been averted if the presidency had been both cohesive and visionary, not to say informed, enough to anticipate the dangers and consequences of its increasingly dysfunctional leadership style. However, all is not lost. If the public can summon the patience and reflection required to help rebuild Nigerian democracy, the current abhorrent struggle for supremacy between the senate and a few members of the executive arm could yet become a part of the learning curve that is an integral part of the African experiment with democracy.

  • Certificate forgery: EFCC arraigns House of Reps member

    Certificate forgery: EFCC arraigns House of Reps member

    The embattled Akwa Ibom House of Representatives’ member, Mr. Nse Ekpenyong, who is facing a certificate forgery charges is allegedly remanded in Uyo prisons for failing to meet bail conditions.

    Ekpenyong under the platform of People’s Democratic Party, PDP, was arraigned at the Federal High Court, Uyo by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, over a forged diploma certificate he claimed to have earned from the Abia State Polytechnic, Aba, Abia State.

    Ekpenyong, who represents Oron Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, was brought before Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu by the EFCC on a nine count charges.

    One of the charges read: “That you Nse Bassey Ekpenyong on or about 22 November 2012, at Uyo, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court did make a document to wit: Abia State Polytechnic National Diploma Certificate in Business Administration with No. 001181 dated 22nd November, 2012 with intent that it may be acted upon as genuine which you knew to be false and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (2) (C) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M 17 of the Revised Edition (Laws of the Federation of Nigeria) 2007 and punishable under section 1 (2) of the same Act,”

    The lawmaker pleaded not guilty to all the charges preferred against him by the EFCC.

    Ekpenyong’s lawyer, Emmanuel Isangedoho argued for his bail conditions which were opposed by EFCC’s lawyer, Ahmedu Arogha.

    Justice Ojukwu assured that the matter would be given urgent attention.

    She, however, granted the lawmaker a bail in the sum of N10m and adjourned the case to April 12.

    A highly placed source told The Nation that the lawmaker who is facing nine count charges over his certificate forgery is cooling off at Uyo Prisons over his inability to perfect his bail conditions.