Tag: EFCC

  • Metuh’s absence stalls trial for destruction of evidence

    Metuh’s absence stalls trial for destruction of evidence

    The absence of former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh, stalled the planned resumption of his trial before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama on Tuesday.

    Metuh is standing trial before Justice Ishaq Bello on charges of wilful destruction of evidence.

    He is accused of destroying a statement he made to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The prosecution has closed its case having called a number of witnesses.

    It was Metuh’s turn to open his case on Tuesday when it was learnt that he was absent due to his admission in the hospital.

    The trial judge was also not in court.

    The prosecution and defence lawyers had no option but to choose another date, with the court’s Registrar adjourning to March 7 for the ex-PDP spokesman to open his defence.

  • Jonathan’s ex-aide not detained illegally – EFCC

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday said a former Senior Special Assistant to ex-President Gooluck Jonathan on Domestic Affairs, Dr. Waripamo-Owei Dudafa, was granted an administrative bail which he did not fulfill.

    The commission said it obtained a remand order from a Magistrate’s Court to detain Dudafa, adding that he was not detained illegally.

    Dudafa had claimed while testifying on Monday that he was “tormented” by EFCC in a bid to get him to implicate the former president.

    Dudafa said he developed a spinal cord ailment while in detention at EFCC, adding that he was denied adequate medical treatment.

    The former presidential aide said all the statements he wrote were dictated to him, and that he was induced to sign the statements in exchange for his freedom.

    Dudafa spoke while testifying in a trial-with-trial which began at the Federal High Court in Lagos after he claimed statements he made at EFCC were not voluntary.

    EFCC arraigned him and Iwejuo Joseph Nna (alias Taiwo A. Ebenezer and Olugbenga Isaiah) before Justice Mohammed Idris on 23-count charge of conspiracy and concealment of crime proceeds.

    They were accused of conspiring to conceal proceeds of crime amounting to over N1.6billion on June 11, 2013.

    They pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    Under cross-examination by EFCC’s lawyer, Rotimi Oyedepo, on Tuesday, Dudafa said he could not remember if he was offered bail.

    “If I was offered bail, I would not have been in detention for 60 days,” he said.

    Oyedepo then showed him a document containing bail conditions that the commission issued to him. Dudafa confirmed that the signature on it is his.

    The document was then tendered in evidence and marked as Exhibit TWT2D.

     

  • EFCC to court: Order forfeiture of Diezani’s N9.08b to FG

    EFCC to court: Order forfeiture of Diezani’s N9.08b to FG

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to order the forfeiture of N9.08 billion allegedly laundered for former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Diezani Allison-Madueke, to the Federal Government.

    Justice Muslim Hassan had on January 6 ordered the temporary forfeiture of the money.

    They include another sum of N23, 446,300,000 and $5milion (about N1.5billion) said to be stashed in different banks.

    The court ordered the banks holding the money to supply proof that it was not stolen or risk losing it permanently to the federal government.

    Only an Executive Director of First Bank Plc, Dauda Lawal, responded to the call.

    EFCC said the allegedly laundered money was a proceed of crime.

    The commission’s lawyer, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, on Tuesday prayed Justice Hassan to make an order forfeiting the money permanently to the federal government.

    Justify the freezing of the money, the lawyer said Section 17 (1) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Related Offences Act makes a property that is reasonably suspected by EFCC to be proceeds of unlawful act forfeitable to the federal government.

    Oyedepo said, “Can it be said that from the facts and circumstances of this case, that the N9,080,000,000.00, which is the naira equivalent of $40million cannot be reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activity?”

    The EFCC lawyer said there was a conspiracy to launder the money, adding that there was “a meeting of the minds” by those it indicted.

  • Alleged fraud: EFCC seizes UMTH’s ex-director’s house

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Tuesday seized a property belonging to a former Assistant Director (Finance and Account), University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital (UMTH), Mahmud Deji Sambo (aka- Ardo Hamjam).

    Sambo is facing trial with one Musti Bukar for allegedly stealing about N58million belonging to the hospital.

    The confiscated house was suspected to have been bought with the stolen funds.

    But the EFCC sought an asset forfeiture order from the Federal High Court Maiduguri, which was presided over by Justice M.T Salihu.

    A statement issued by the Head of Media and Publicity of EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, said: “The EFCC has secured the forfeiture of a property located at Plot 114, Gamji Road, New GRA, off Bama Road, Maiduguri, belonging to Mahmud Deji Sambo (aka- Ardo Hamjam) a former Assistant Director (Finance and Account) in the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital who is being prosecuted on a three-count charge of stealing by the Commission.

    “The property was attached pursuant to an order by Justice M.T Salihu of the Federal High Court Maiduguri. The property is alleged to have been acquired with proceeds of crime.

    “It will be recalled that Deji and Musti Bukar were arraigned by the EFCC on Wednesday, April 7, 2016 for alleged fraud perpetrated in the finance department of UMTH, to the tune of N58m.

    “They pleaded not guilty to the charges. So far, the prosecution has called 10 witnesses as trial continues.”

     

  • EFCC: Why Senate should confirm Magu’s nomination – Buhari

    EFCC: Why Senate should confirm Magu’s nomination – Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday said the need to sustain the current anti-graft war informed his decision to re-nominate the Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC), Mr. Ibrahim Magu, for consideration and confirmation by the Senate.

    President Buhari noted that in undertaking the anti-graft campaign, his administration has been guided by the need for urgency, consolidation and improvement of the statutory framework for addressing the scourge of corruption in the country.

    He said the need to take the benefits of institutional memory and present capacity in taking the campaign forward should was also recognised.

    President Buhari said he has received adequate clarification on the matter relied upon by the Senate during its decision to reject Magu’s nomination.

    The Senate, however, said President Buhari’s letter representing Magu for confirmation failed to address the issues raised in the Department of State Services (DSS) report which weighed heavily against Magu.

    The Senate President, Bukola Saraki, had read a letter by President Buhari re-nominating Magu for confirmation as EFCC Chairman.

    The upper chamber went into closed door session immediately it resumed plenary apparently to discuss the re-nomination of Magu and President Buhari’s rejection of the Senate resolution to approve the resignation of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr. Babachir David- Lawal, over alleged abuse of office.

    After over one hour closed session said to have been “heated” Saraki emerged to announce the receipt of a letter re-nominating Magu for confirmation as EFCC chairman.

    A reliable source told our correspondent that the questions before the Senate during the closed session included whether the Senate should dismiss the report of the DSS which weighed heavily against Magu.

    The Senate, he said wanted to know whether the issues raised by the DSS are true of false.

     

  • EFCC re-arraigns Dasuki, Yuguda, others

    EFCC re-arraigns Dasuki, Yuguda, others

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Tuesday re-arraigned, retired Col. Sambo Dasuki, a former National Security Adviser (NSA) and five others, for alleged diversion, and criminal breach of trust at an FCT High Court.

    The others were Bashir Yuguda, Shuaibu Salisu, a former Director of Finance, Office of the NSA, Dalhatu Investment Ltd., Sagir Attahiru and Attahiru Bafarawa, a former governor of Sokoto State.

    They were re-arraigned on a 22-count charge before Justice Hussein Baba-Yusuf,  and they pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    Baba-Yusuf ordered that the existing bail condition be maintained after listening to submissions of all counsel to the defendants  and the prosecuting counsel.

    The Prosecuting counsel, Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), opposed the upholding of Dasuki’s bail, saying that he was still being held by the Department of State Services (DSS) since he was granted bail earlier.

    Jacobs also applied for date to open his case against the defendants since they pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    This, he said, was in accordance with Section 396 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, which provides for day-to-day trial.

    Dasuki’s  counsel, Mr Ahmed Raji (SAN), objected, saying that the EFCC  brought his client to court and not DSS.

    He also said that ECOWAS court had earlier given a valid judgment on the issue and objected to the suggestion of Rotimi.

    He argued that the day-to-day trial was when the case fully commences.

    The counsel to other defendants aligned with Dr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), Counsel to Bafaarawa, saying that Section 396 of ACJA should not be put above the provisions of in Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

    Fagbemi said that the section provides for fair hearing and so it would not be right for the defendants to be arraign today and trial to commence tomorrow.

    Baba-Yusuf adjourned till Feb. 24 for commencement of trial.

    Dasuki and others were earlier arraigned on a 22-count charge bordering on diversion, conspiracy, bribery, abuse of office and criminal breach of trust of about N19.4 billion before Justice Peter Affen in December 2015.

    The defendants were also granted bail by Affen in the sum of N250 million each with two sureties each in the like sum.

    Affen said that one of sureties must be a retired or serving civil servant in Federal Government’s employment, reside within the court’s jurisdiction and own landed property in Abuja.

    The case was consolidated and transferred to Baba-Yusuf’s court following an application by Chief Joseph Daudu, counsel to Dasuki. (NAN)

  • EFCC: Senate gets Buhari’s renomination of Magu

    EFCC: Senate gets Buhari’s renomination of Magu

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday represented Ibrahim Magu for confirmation as chairman of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Senate president Bukola Saraki read Buhari’s letter on the floor of the Senate.

    Buhari also declined Senate’s request for sack of the Secretary to the Government of Federation (SGF)

  • Buhari insists on Magu

    Buhari insists on Magu

    President pleads for SGF Lawal

    After weeks of intrigues, President Muhammadu Buhari has renominated Ibrahim Magu for Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) chairman.
    It was also learnt that the Presidency may raise a lobbying team to prevail on the Senate to allow Magu’s nomination sail through.
    The lobbying will involve confidence building and allaying the fears of some senators who believe they might be the targets of the ongoing anti-corruption war.
    A letter has been sent to Senate President Bukola Saraki, The Nation has learnt.
    Prior to the disclosure in the Senate, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr. Babachir Lawal, had broken the news of the President’s decision to Magu, a source said.
    It was gathered that the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mallam Abubakar Malami (SAN), met with the acting EFCC chairman on Friday. The “rough edges were smoothened and a better understanding struck,” it was learnt.
    A source, who pleaded not to be named, said: “A letter has been sent to the Senate by the President to renominate Magu. As a matter of fact, the President based his decision on the fact that there was no evidence linking the acting chairman of EFCC to any act of corruption or infractions.
    “The President is convinced that Magu has tried his best to fight corruption in a selfless manner and without fear or favour.
    “All intra-cabinet challenges which led to the initial security report on Magu were addressed by the President before he left for London.”
    Buhari, it was learnt, made up his mind to reappoint Magu after a personal interaction with the Acting EFCC chairman about one and half weeks ago on Malami’s report.
    Besides, said another source, some members of the kitchen cabinet and associates of the President insisted on Magu because his performance  so far has defined the main achievement of this administration.
    Members of the kitchen cabinet and associates who influenced Buhari’s decision are Vice President Yemi Osinbajo;  Amb. Babagana Kingibe;  elder statesman Mamman Daura; Prof. Itse Sagay; National Security Adviser Gen.  Babagana Moguno;  and members of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption; a former Inspector-General of Police; Amb. Maina Waziri; Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai and Aisha Buhari.
    The assessment and acceptance of Magu by some countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, were said to have availed Buhari of intelligence report which made the President to retain the Acting EFCC chairman.
    Another source said: “Before making up his mind, the President met separately with the AGF, Magu and the DG of the DSS  on the allegations contained in the security report sent to the Senate.
    “At the session with Magu, the President was convinced that he did not commit any offence.
    “On the same day, he gave Magu and the AGF  a joint assignment to do for him. This was the first signal that he might be renominated.
    “Contrary to what is being insinuated, the President consulted widely with his advisory council against corruption and he upheld the argument of members of
    PACAC that Magu deserves to come back.
    “But some kitchen cabinet members and associates, including Vice President Osinbajo, actually worked day and night to ensure the retention of Magu. Either at breakfast or dinner, they seized every opportunity to impress on the President why Magu should be given a chance.
    “ Kingibe, who has known Magu’s father for long, stressed that the family has a long history of uprightness and steadfastness.
    “These kitchen cabinet members also reconciled Magu and the Director-General of the Department  of State Security Service, Mallam Lawan Daura, who clarified that he was never interested in destroying anybody’s career let alone Magu whom he sees as a son.”
    The presidency may raise a lobbying team to prevail on the Senate to confirm Magu.
    A source in the Presidency said: “We know the renomination of Magu might still not go down well with some senators but the Presidency will allay their fears.
    “This time around, there will be intense legislative lobbying to build confidence in all that Magu will be fair to everybody, irrespective of ethnic, religious or party affiliations.
    “We knew what wrong during the first nomination. The Presidency will not allow a repeat of such. All we have to do is to promote the merits behind the choice of Magu.
    “As a matter of fact, some senators do not have enough fact-sheet on Magu. We are going to do much work this time around. Some were angry that the Senate was being blackmailed by pro-Magu forces in the Senate and in annoyance they threw away his nomination.
    “And for the new Senate Leader, Sen. Ahmed Lawan, this is his first major test to show that he has the confidence of his colleagues”.
    However, Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate) Mr. Ita Enang, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN): “I’m not aware of that discussion (on Magu) and I don’t want to speak on the matter because I don’t have details.”

  • Dudafa: I was tormented by EFCC to implicate Jonathan

    Dudafa: I was tormented by EFCC to implicate Jonathan

    A former Senior Special Assistant to ex-President Gooluck Jonathan on Domestic Affairs, Dr. Waripamo-Owei Dudafa, yesterday said he was “tormented” by Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in a bid to get him to implicate the former President.
    Dudafa said he developed a spinal cord ailment while in detention at EFCC, adding that he was denied adequate medical treatment.
    The former presidential aide said all statements he wrote were dictated to him and that he was induced to sign in exchange for his freedom.
    Dudafa was testifying in a trial-within-trial, which began at the Federal High Court in Lagos after he claimed statements he made at EFCC were not voluntary.
    EFCC arraigned him and Iwejuo Joseph Nna (alias Taiwo A. Ebenezer and Olugbenga Isaiah) before Justice Mohammed Idris on 23-counts of conspiracy and concealment of crime proceeds.
    They were accused of conspiring to conceal proceeds of crime amounting to over N1.6 billion on June 11, 2013. They pleaded not guilty to all the counts.
    Dudafa said he was arrested last April 17 on a Sunday and kept in detention till Monday evening without anybody explaining why he was arrested.
    He said he was kept in detention until April 27 before he was taken to EFCC’s office on Awolowo Road for interrogation, where he made four statements, including an asset declaration form, which he described as a “sham”.
    Dudafa said he was denied access to his mobile phone from April 27, and his family was stopped from bringing food to him.
    “April 27 till May 12 was so tormenting for me. Sometimes, I was taken out from the detention centre and kept in EFCC office from 8am to 8pm, sometimes till 11pm.
    “The ailment I have today is a spinal cord dislocation. It was within that period of torture and agony that my spinal cord got dislocated due to sitting down from morning till night,” he said.
    The defendant claimed EFCC denied him access to his lawyers, saying: “I made a request, in fact my lawyers were driven away.”
    Dudafa said he was invited to a meeting in which all parties in the case were involved. Everyone else had a lawyer, except him, he claimed.
    He said EFCC nominated a lawyer he did not know to represent him. “That was the only statement that was endorsed by a lawyer – a lawyer that was not known to me,” he said.
    According to him, EFCC officials gave him paracetamol and aspirin and only allowed him to see an in-house doctor when his situation worsened.
    The EFCC doctor, he said, referred him to a military hospital where tests showed he had a spinal cord injury and needed to see a specialist.
    “I was not taken to any specialist. My family even offered to bring an orthopedic physician to attend to me, but they refused. While in the cell, I was isolated. They wanted me to say a lot of things.
    “They asked me questions about Goodluck Jonathan. In my statements at the time, I stated that every function I discharged was official because I acted based on instruction.
    “I was dehumanised to the extent that I got scared of people walking past me,” he said.
    Dudafa accused EFCC investigators of trying to breaking him so he could do their bidding.
    He said an investigator, Orji Chukwumau, once asked him: “So, you’re still strong?”
    The former presidential aide said EFCC even extended the ill-treatment to his family, freezing his wife’s and children’s schools savings accounts “in a bid to frustrate and break me down”.
    He said on May 20, Chukwuma took him to the Head of Operations in Lagos, Iliasu Kwabai, who told him that the Federal Government was only interested in recovering stolen money because there was not enough money to fund the budget.
    “They told me they only wanted to recover money and that they needed my cooperation. My response was ‘no’ though my freedom was paramount to me. Iliasu said I should return money for my freedom.
    “The Director of Operation threatened me, saying I would remain in detention forever unless I cooperated. He told me that my freedom was dependent upon the release of the money. My wife and children could not feed. Everything became a yardstick for my freedom. I had no objection to what he was saying.
    “Until May 20, my statements were largely dictated to me. My health condition was deteriorating. On May 30, my family raised an alarm telling the world that EFCC refused to treat me,” Dudafa said.
    According to him, EFCC eventually seized an unspecified amount of money from him, yet did not release him as promised.
    “On June 1, they went to the bank and the money was released to them, still they refused to let me go. They asked me to bring sureties, and they arrested up to 40 members of my family and friends. For fear of being arrested, all my friends and family deserted me,” Dudafa said.
    The defendant said EFCC officials again told him he was about to be released and asked him to attest to all the statements he purportedly made. He said when he realised that he did not make the statements voluntarily, he raised objections.
    He said a video that was shown in court of where he attested to the statements was doctored.
    According to him, all the points in the video, where he raised objections, were deliberately blurred or made blank.
    “I was saying: Let it be clear that the statement was largely dictated. These statements were teleguided by EFCC and dictated. I was less than a human being while at EFCC. I couldn’t even spell my name at some point. I was not physically threatened, but I was mentally threatened,” Dudafa said.
    During cross-examination by EFCC’s prosecutor Rotimi Oyedepo, Dudafa admitted that he was cautioned before making the statements. He said he was also never forced to admit to committing any crime in the statements.
    But he insisted he was asked to sign the statements, saying: “Most of the signatures were done the day I was released.”
    Earlier in the trial-within-trial, Chukwuma and an operative Akeem Lasisi, testified that Dudafa made his statement voluntarily.
    The duo said they cautioned the suspect before he made his statements, adding that he was not forced to write anything against his will.
    EFCC accused the defendants of concealing the N1.6 billion through a company, Seagate Property Development and Investment Ltd, an offence contrary to Section 18(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) (Amendment) Act, 2012 and punishable under Section 17(a).
    They were also accused of knowingly concealing proceeds of crime through Avalon Global Property Development Company Ltd in the sum of N399, 470,000.00, among others.
    The trial-within-trial continues today.

  • EFCC to court: Dismiss ex-NIMASA DG’s no-case submission

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday asked the Federal High Court in Lagos to dismiss a no-case submission made by former Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) acting Director-General, Calistus Obi.

    Obi was arraigned last April on eight –count charge of converting N378,810,000 from NIMASA.

    He was charged along with Dismass Alu Adoon, Grand Pact Limited and Global Sea Investment Limited.

    Justice Mojisola Olatoregun-Ishola on Monday reserved till February 21 ruling on the no-case submission.

    Defence counsel, Mr. Wale Akoni (SAN), urged the court to hold that the prosecution did not establish a prima facie case to secure the conviction.

    He said:” The test is what are the essential elements of each of the offence? The test of the evidence is in the ingredient of the offence,” he said.

    Counsel to the second accused, Mr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN), also urged the court to uphold the no case submission of his client and discharge him.

    He argued that the charges against his client were predicated mainly on conspiracy and conversion, adding that the prosecution has not established sufficient evidence in proving an agreement to commit the offence.

    EFCC’s prosecutor, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo, objected to the no-case submissions, and urged the court to call upon the accused to enter their defence.