Tag: EFCC

  • Money laundering: EFCC fails to arraign Suswam

    Money laundering: EFCC fails to arraign Suswam

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) failed to arraign former Benue State Governor, Gabriel Suswam, who is facing money laundering and corruption charges, on Wednesday.

    The EFCC had on Tuesday announced its intention to arraign Suswam before a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Suswam and his former finance commissioner, Omodachi Okolobia were alleged to have diverted the proceeds of sale of shares owned by the Benue State Government and Benue Investment and Property Company Limited.

    The offence is punishable under section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 20111 as amended in 2012.

    One of EFCC lawyers, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), was later sighted in court on Wednesday.

    The lawyer said he was unsure if the case was assigned to any judge.

  • Maina faults EFCC on wanted notice

    Maina faults EFCC on wanted notice

    THE former Chairman of Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT), Mr. Abdulrasheed Maina, yesterday faulted the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on an alleged order by Justice G.O. Kolawole that he be produced in court by his counsel, Esther Uzoma.

    Uzoma, in a statement in Abuja, said she made an appearance on July 21 to protest the EFCC’s claim that her client was on the run when no charge had been served on him.

    She said EFCC’s action was against the letters of the law.

    The statement said: “The EFCC should come clean on the matter of my client, Dr. Abdulrasheed Maina. When I appeared before His Lordship Justice Kolawole on July 21, I made it clear that the EFCC was yet to file any charge as well as serve any summons on Dr. Maina.

    “It is trite law that you cannot say an accused is on the run when there is no charge preferred against him or any invitation extended to him.

    “During the hearing for the bail application, counsel to the EFCC, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs SAN, wanted the court to direct me to produce Maina in court at the next sitting which I argued that there are clear procedures, which the EFCC is familiar with and should follow.

    “Naturally, the court agreed with my submission on the position of law. Therefore, it is misleading for the EFCC in its statement of Monday to mislead the public that there exists an order for Maina to be produced in court when there is no invitation extended to him talk-less of a charge preferred against him by the commission.”

    The EFCC on Monday declared Maina, wanted.

  • Alleged N3.1b fraud: EFCC files charges against Suswam

    Alleged N3.1b fraud: EFCC files charges against Suswam

    •Ex-governor’s trial likely today

    THE Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) will today arraigned former Benue State Governor, Dr. Gabriel Suswam, before a Federal High Court in Abuja for alleged laundering of about N3.1 billion.

    The ex-governor is likely to be arraigned with his former Finance Commissioner, Omodachi Okolobia, depending on his cooperation with the anti-graft agency.

    A highly-placed source said: “Barring any last minute hitch, the commission will formally arraign a former governor of Benue State, Dr. Gabriel Suswam, before an Abuja Court on November 4.

    “The anti-graft agency on Monday, October 2, 2015, filed a nine-count charge bordering on money laundering to the tune of N3.1 billion at a Federal High Court, Abuja.”

    Suswam and Okolobia were alleged to have diverted proceeds of the sale of shares owned by the state government and the state Investment and Property Company Limited.

    The offence is punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2011 as amended in 2012.

    Prior to the filing of charges, EFCC had quizzed Suswam and Okolobia based on the report of the Benue State’s 16-member Transition Committee, led by its chairman, Mr. Mike Iordye.

    The committee had uncovered the shares scam as well as over N90 billion debt and disappearance of N6.507 billion meant for SURE-P among others.

    Shortly after Governor Samuel Ortom took over, he said he would probe Suswam’s administration.

    He said: “We are going to look at Governor Suswam’s administration. Though we do not have specific areas where we intend to look at, I assure you that we are going to stand for the people of Benue State.”

    On his part, Suswam said he was not afraid of the ongoing probe of his administration by the Ortom administration.

    He said the probe might set bad precedent in the state and no one knows whose turn would be next.

    Suswam said: “On the issue of probe going on in Benue State, it is not that one is afraid, but once a precedent is set, it is a double-edge sword. You don’t know whose turn it is tomorrow; you don’t know tomorrow.

    “When I became the governor of Benue State, I met some issues on ground, but I resolved it amicably. When there are issues, let us talk about it amicably instead of grandstanding. This remains my approach to life. I encourage us in Benue to toe the path of peace.”

     

     

  • Maina faults EFCC on wanted notice, court order

    Maina faults EFCC on wanted notice, court order

    The former Chairman of the Pension Reform Task Team (PRTT), Mr. Abdulrasheed Maina, on Tuesday faulted the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on an alleged order by Justice G.O. Kolawole, that he be produced in court by his counsel, Bar. Esther Uzoma.

    Uzoma in a statement in Abuja said she made an appearance on July 21 to protest the EFCC’s claim that her client was on the run when no charge had been served on him.

    She said EFCC’s action was against the letters of the law.

    The statement said: “The EFCC should come clean on the matter of my client, Dr. Abdulrasheed Maina. When I appeared before His Lordship, Justice Kolawole, on July 21, I made it clear that the EFCC was yet to file any charge as well as serve any summons on Dr. Maina.

    “It is trite law that you cannot say an accused is on the run when there is no charge preferred against him or any invitation extended to him.

    “During the hearing for the bail application, counsel to the EFCC, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), wanted the court to direct me to produce Maina in court at the next sitting which I argued that there are clear procedures, which the EFCC is familiar with and should follow.

    “Naturally, the court agreed with my submission on the position of law. Therefore, it is misleading for the EFCC in its statement of Monday to mislead the public that there exists an order for Maina to be produced in court when there is no invitation extended to him talk-less of a charge preferred against him by the commission.”

    The EFCC on Monday declared Maina, wanted.

    A statement issued by the Head of Media and Publicity of EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, said Maina was wanted for his alleged role in the fraudulent biometric contracts through which he and former Head of Service, Steve Oronsaye and two others allegedly mismanaged over N2billion pension funds.

    The statement said: “Maina was on July 21, 2015 charged alongside Oronsaye , Osarenkhoe Afe and Fredrick HamiltonbGlobal Services Limited before a Federal High Court on a 24-count charge bordering on procurement fraud and obtaining by false pretence.

    “While Oronsaye and two others were in court and pleaded not guilty to the charge, Maina had been at large.

    “However on July 21 when the court heard the bail applications of the accused persons, Maina through his counsel, Esther Uzoma told the court that he was not at large, claiming that the EFCC had never invited him.

    “Consequently, EFCC counsel, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), pleaded with the court to prevail on the accused’s counsel to produce Maina in court as the Commission had no clues as to his whereabouts.

    “The court granted Rotimi’s prayers, yet Maina continued to shun court proceedings, leaving the Commission with no option than to declare him wanted.”

  • Diezani: EFCC seizes associates’ bullet-proof cars

    Diezani: EFCC seizes associates’ bullet-proof cars

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has seized bullet-proof vehicles, huge cash and jewellery from five prominent Nigerians fingered in the money laundering allegation against former Petroleum Resources Minister Mrs Diezani Alison-Madueke.

    EFCC and its British counterpart, National Crime Agency (NCA), are probing the suspects for allegedly conniving with Alison-Madueke to commit the crime, it was learnt yesterday.

    The former minister was arrested in London on October 2 for alleged money laundering, bribery and corruption.

    EFCC has restricted the movement of the ”high-profile” suspects to Nigeria, pending the conclusion of investigation.

    Some of them may be extradited to the United Kingdom (UK), if the former minister is going to face trial.

    According to investigation, EFCC is still searching the companies and homes of more suspects linked with the former minister, following fresh clues.

    Most of the areas under surveillance are in Abuja and Lagos.

    A top source said: ‘’It is too early to declare whether they are guilty or not. But in line with international best practices, the EFCC has invoked the assets forfeiture clause in its Act to seize some choice bullet-proof vehicles, huge cash and jewellery from these suspects.

    ‘’The movement of the affected suspects has also been restricted to Nigeria pending the conclusion of investigation.

    ‘’The case at hand involves a high-net worth syndicate with tentacles across the strata of the society. But we are already cracking the investigation.’’

    Asked if the suspects will be tried in Nigeria, the source added: ‘’It is uncertain or remote because the NCA has initiated a process in the UK, we will not want to duplicate the process.

    ‘’ If necessary, some of the suspects might be extradited to the UK for trial. This depends on NCA because EFCC is only collaborating with the agency.’’

    It was learnt that some NCA officials are in the country to work with EFCC on the case.

    A source said: ‘’Some officials of the NCA are in the country for collaboration with the EFCC on this investigation of the allegations against the ex-minister.

    ‘’The EFCC has more knowledge of the terrain than the NCA in tracking down some of these suspects.’’

    Neither the EFCC nor the NCA was willing to speak on record last night.

    Alison-Madueke and four others have been under investigation. On October 2, they appeared before the NCA team in the UK.

    The names of the four remaining suspects are being kept under wraps in ‘’order not to jeopardise investigation.’’

     

  • EFCC declares ex-Pension Chief Maina wanted

    EFCC declares ex-Pension Chief Maina wanted

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday declared the former Pension Reform Task Team’s Chairman, Mr. Abdulrasheed Maina, wanted.

    A statement by the Head of Media and Publicity of EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, said Maina is wanted for his alleged role in the fraudulent biometric contracts through which he and former Head of Service Steve Oronsaye and two others allegedly mismanaged over N2 billion of pension funds.

    The statement said: “Maina was on July 21, 2015 charged alongside Oronsaye , Osarenkhoe Afe and Fredrick HamiltonbGlobal Services Limited before a Federal High Court on a 24-count charge bordering on procurement fraud and obtaining by false pretence.

    “While Oronsaye and two others were in court and pleaded not guilty to the charge, Maina had been at large.

    “However, on July 21 when the court heard the bail applications of the accused persons, Maina through his counsel, Esther Uzoma, told the court that he was not at large, claiming that the EFCC had never invited him.

    “Consequently, EFCC counsel, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, pleaded with the court to prevail on the accused’s counsel to produce Maina in court as the commission had no clues as to his whereabouts.

    “The court granted Rotimi’s prayers. Yet Maina continued to shun court proceedings, leaving the commission with no option than to declare him wanted.

    “Indeed, since the commission filed charges against Maina, more damning evidence have emerged on how the ebullient former Pension Task Team boss siphoned pension funds using secret accounts in a new generation bank in Abuja.

    “Two officers of the bank were quizzed two weeks ago. Commission’s sources said they made damning revelations of several opaque transactions through which Maina allegedly lined his pockets at the expense of thousands of hapless pensioners.”

    The commission implored anyone with information on Maina’s whereabouts to contact any of its offices in Lagos, Abuja, Gombe, Kano, Port Harcourt and Enugu or report at the nearest police station.

    [news_box style=”2″ display=”tag” link_target=”_blank” tag=”EFCC” count=”6″ show_more=”on” show_more_type=”link”]

  • Alleged N1.2b pension scam: How corps member got N23m, by EFCC

    Alleged N1.2b pension scam: How corps member got N23m, by EFCC

    AN investigator with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Roukayya Ibrahim, yesterday explained how a corps member was paid N23 million of a N1.2 billion pension fraud.

    She also said an IT firm was paid about N153 million for the biometric contract without due process.

    The investigator made the revelations while testifying before Justice Abubakar Talba of the FCT High Court at the resumption of the trial of four suspects.

    The accused persons are Ibrahim Ahmed Mazangari, Muhammed Sani Sulaiman, Hajia Fatima Mazangari and Saleh Yerima Tsojon.

    A statement by EFCC’s Head of Media and Publicity of the EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren said Tsojon, who was on his mandatory NYSC service in Calabar, received pension payment, which amounted to about N23 million.

    The statement said:  “The trial of Ibrahim Ahmed Mazangari, Muhammed Sani Sulaiman, Hajia Fatima Mazangari and Saleh Yerima Tsojon, who allegedly ran a syndicate that defrauded the Federal Government to the tune of N1.2 billion in a pension scam, continued on Monday (yesterday) with the prosecution witness giving insight into how they carried out the fraud.

    “Led in evidence by prosecuting counsel  O. A. Atolagbe, the witness, Roukayya Ibrahim, an investigator with the EFCC and a member of the pension fraud team, told the court that the fraud was uncovered in 2010 while the Head of Service Pension Board was being probed.

    “We received intelligence of the syndicate operating in Kaduna, led by Hajia Fatima Mazangari, and we immediately commenced investigation.”

    According to her, “the accused persons used two companies – Xangee Technologies Limited and Century Construction Company Limited – to perpetrate the fraud.”

    “She told the court that Xangee Technologies Limited, which is owned by Mazangari, was offered a biometric contract by a former Head of Service, Steve Oronsaye, to regularise names of pensioners on the pensions’ payroll, but smuggled in names of fake pensioners (including his), and collected unearned pension,” the statement said.

    The EFCC investigator said the biometric contract was awarded without due process.

    “Investigations showed that Xangee, an IT firm, was paid about N153 million for the biometric contract, but we found out that the process of awarding the contract did not follow due process as there was no contract bidding, yet payment was made,” she said.

    The second accused person, according to Roukayya, used three variants of his name to open three different pension accounts, to which about N24 million of pensions were paid; the money was afterwards withdrawn and handed over to Fatima.

    The four accused persons are being prosecuted by the EFCC, on a 29-count charge of conspiracy, and obtaining by false pretence.

    They were alleged to have obtained N1.2 billion from the Federal Government, purporting same to be monthly pension payable to M. S. Suleiman, Saleh Yerima Tsojon, Isah U. Adamu, Daniel Mikano and Abdulahi Garba Musa, who were falsely held out as pensioners, by inserting their names in the payroll.

    Justice Talba fixed November 3, 2015 for further hearing.

     

  • Funds diversion: Senate resumes Lamorde’s probe next week

    Funds diversion: Senate resumes Lamorde’s probe next week

    Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions on Monday said it will resume investigation into the allegation of corruption against the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde, next week.

    Chairman of the Committee, Senator Samuel Anyanuwu, stated this in Abuja while answering questions from reporters.

    Anyanwu noted that the committee suspended the investigation for about three weeks when it first met Lamorde and granted him an extension of time to prepare for his defence.

    He also said that it was not possible for the committee to resume the probe as scheduled because it fell within the annual recess of the National Assembly.

    He said that many of the committee members travelled out of Abuja during the recess.

    He noted that when the Senate resumed from the long vacation, Senators faced the task of ministerial screening and confirmation of nominees.

    It will be recalled that the committee had its first sitting on the petition on August 26, 2015, where the petitioner, Dr. George Uboh, appeared before the lawmakers to make his submissions.

    Dr. Uboh had in his petition, which he submitted to the Senate, accused the chairman of the anti-graft agency of diversion of money recovered from politicians, who looted the nation’s treasury when they served the country in various capacities.

     

     

  • N1tr forfeited funds: Reps seek ICPC’s probe of EFCC

    N1tr forfeited funds: Reps seek ICPC’s probe of EFCC

    Non-remittance of cash alleged

    Where is the N1trillion forfeited cash with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)?

    Has the cash been remitted into government coffers? Was it diverted?

    These were some of the posers raised by the House of Representatives yesterday following a motion moved by Minority Leader Leo Ogor.

    Ogor is seeking an investigation into the whereabouts of the recovered loot in line with the war against corruption.

    A businessman, George Uboh, had petitioned the Federal Ministry of Justice on the matter, accusing EFCC Chairman Ibrahim Lamorde of diverting the cash.

    The ministry has directed EFCC to probe its chairman based on Uboh’s petition.

    At plenary yesterday, the House directed its Committee on Financial Crimes to investigate the alleged non-remittance of the funds by EFCC.

    The lawmakers also urged the Solicitor-General of the Federation and Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Justice, to re-assign the investigation of Uboh’s petition to either the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) or the Police.

    Moving the motion titled: “Urgent need to investigate the non-remittance of court-ordered forfeited funds and properties by the EFCC into the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation and for other related matters”, Ogor opposed the Solicitor-General’s directive  that EFCC should investigate Lamorde.

    According to him, Section 88(i) of the 1999 Constitution confers powers on the House to investigate the diversion of funds by Lamorde and other past EFCC chairmen.

    He said there was a subsisting petition by Uboh against the present and past EFCC leaders on alleged funds diversion, noting that  the House “should  thoroughly investigate the allegation of diversion of this huge sums of monies -trillion of naira; other members of staff of the EFCC must be investigated.”

    Ogor added: “The EFCC is not the only agency of government charged with investigations that border on diversion of funds by public officers; the EFCC itself cannot be a judge in its own case.”

    Funds worth billions of naira, he said, should have been paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the federation as stipulated under Section 31(2, 3) of the EFCC establishment Act of 2004.

    In the wake of Uboh’s  allegation, the EFCC commissioned KPMG to audit its financial accounts.

    The issue is also before the Senate and the audit report is expected to be laid before the Senator Samuel Anyanwu-led Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions.

     

  • Alleged fraud: Lawyer’s absence stalls Indian’s trial

    The trial of an Indian businessman, Patrick Fernandez, who allegedly defrauded five banks of N32billion, was stalled on Tuesday at the Federal High Court in Lagos due to the absence of his lawyer, Mr. James Ocholi (SAN).

    Ocholi is one of the ministerial nominees screened by the Senate.

    Fernandez, along with three of his companies, is facing 56-count charge of fraud.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) said it learnt of the fraud in July 2008 when one of the banks contacted the agency’s Financial Intelligence Unit.

    The affected banks, EFCC said, are Zenith Bank, Afribank, Intercontinental Bank (now Access Bank), Union Bank and Wema Bank.

    The commission said the fraud was uncovered when the banks discovered “they were clearing the same cheque” from the defendant.

    When the case was called for trial to begin, Mr. Kayode Enitan, who announced appearance for the defendant, said he was standing in for Ocholi, who he said was unavoidably absent.

    He said: “I have Ocholi’s directive to ask for an adjournment. He had prepared for the case, but events of the past two weeks with regards to his nomination as a minister are still ongoing. This has made it difficult for him to attend the hearing.

    “We crave the indulgence of my Lord for an adjournment for a date in early December by which time arrangement will have been made for the continuation of the representation of the first and second defendants.”

    However, EFCC’s lawyer, Mr. Adebisi Adeniyi, opposed the application for an adjournment. He said since Enitan was holding Ocholi’s brief, the case could go on.

    Besides, he said the defence did not inform the prosecution that the case would not be going on, saying it was unfair to wait for hours only to be told that Ocholi would not come.

    But Justice John Tsoho overruled the prosecution’s objection, saying: “The reason put across (by the defence) appears to be cogent.”

    He added that Ocholi’s nomination had been in public domain.

    Testifying at the last hearing, an EFCC investigator, Bashir Abdullahi, said Fernandez was involved in “cheque-kitting and round tripping,” which he said is also known as “Lazy Susan, a business model.”

    According to him, Lazy Susan involves members of a business group transferring money from one sister company to another without selling any commodity, using money obtained from banks as loans.