Tag: EFCC

  • Court orders EFCC to release girl held for mother’s debt

    Court orders EFCC to release girl held for mother’s debt

    A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos has ordered the release of a Babcock University student, Miss Oluwateniola Omidiji, detained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as a result of a debt owed by her widowed mother, Mrs Omoniyi Omidiji.

    In a fundamental rights action suit she filed in FHC/L/CS/759/224, Miss Omidiji alleged that she was taken hostage by EFCC operatives over a debt which one Mr. Charles Nwoko alleged that her mother owes.

    Nwoko said he invested N100 million in Mrs. Omidiji’s business sometime in 2020, but that he came after Oluwateniola for the sum and the interest since her mother, his joint venture partner, is out of Nigeria.

    Justice Y. Bogoro gave the order following an application for the enforcement of her fundamental human rights brought by her lawyer, Mr Emeka Chijioke, SAN, of Auxano Law Chambers. Already, Oluwateniola, 19, is spending her 11th day in EFCC detention.

    The judge said: “I have considered the ex-parte application, the extant laws under which the application is brought,the affidavit supporting the application…, I hereby grant the reliefs sought.”

    Read Also; Aircraft technical fault forces Shettima to aborts US trip

    EFCC operatives arrested the third year student at her school’s premises April 26, this year. She was subsequently detained at the agency’s detention facility at Ikoyi Lagos, where she’s been kept since. Justice Bogoro’s order was issued on Friday, May 3, 2024.

    During investigation, EFCC discovered that four persons were named directors in a company called Elisto Global Services Limited, which Mrs. Omidiji allegedly used to receive the money from Mr. Nwoko.

    They are the applicant’s mother; the alleged creditor, Mr. Nwoko; the applicant’s brother and the applicant.

    Oluwateniola had cried out to the Court for relief after her institution was stormed last Friday by EFCC operatives while she was writing exams.

    They laid siege to the school and took her away.

    EFCC is alleged to have maintained that having been named by her mother as a director of Elisto, the 19-year-old Oluwateniola should answer for her mother’s presumed wrongs in the deal with Mr. Nwoko.

    Oluwateniola has been detained at EFCC’s facility at Ikoyi, until EFCC gets her mother’s attention while other students have since continued with their exams.

    In an application to enforce her fundamental rights filed by her lawyer Chijioke Emeka, SAN of Auxano Law, Oluwateniola contends that she was only a 16-year-old minor when her mother entered into partnership with Mr. Nwoko and she knew nothing about it.

    She contended that it was wrong for the EFCC to hold her hostage over a wrong allegedly done by her mother.

    She further contended that the transaction is a civil matter and asked the court to order the EFCC to leave her out of the issue and pay her N10 million as damages for the violation of her fundamental rights to human dignity, personal liberty, fair hearing and freedom of movement.

    No date has been fixed for the hearing of the case. But Justice Bogoro adjourned further hearing in the suit till May 21, this year.

  • Binance: EFCC presents two witnesses as money laundering trial stalls

    Binance: EFCC presents two witnesses as money laundering trial stalls

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday presented two witnesses in the trial of Binance Holdings Limited and its two executives before a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    EFCC’s lawyer, Ekele Iheanacho, informed Justice Emeka Nwite about the development upon resumption of trial in the money laundering trial.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the anti-graft agency had preferred a five-count charge against the crypto-currency firm, its top officials – Tigran Gambaryan and Nadeem Anjarwalla (said to be on the run) – as the first to third defendants.

    They were alleged to have conspired amongst themselves to conceal the origin of the financial proceeds of their alleged unlawful activities in Nigeria, including $35,400,000, among others.

    The commission accused them of committing the offence contrary to Section 21 (a) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, among others.

    But Anjarwalla escaped from lawful custody on March 22, fleeing Nigeria to Kenya before arraignment.

    The defendants were later arraigned on April 8 but pleaded not guilty to the counts.

    Gambaryan was ordered to be remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre.

    Through his lawyer, Mark Mordi (SAN), Gambaryan applied for a bail on April 23, which the EFCC opposed, and the ruling was fixed for May 17.

    Read Also: Olubadan: Olakulehin’s enthronement takes another twist as Ladoja, kingmakers differ on terms of settlement

    Also, when the matter was called yesterday, Iheanacho said it was scheduled for trial commencement.

    “The matter is for commencement of trial and we have two of our witnesses in court today, my lord,” he told the court.

    But counsel to Binance Limited, Tonye Krukrubo (SAN), objected to Iheanacho’s submission.

    The lawyer told the court that his client had not been served with the court documents in the matter.

    “If we are here for trial, can my learner friend confirm if the 1st defendant has been served with any process,” he said.

    The EFCC lawyer countered that all the defendants, including the first defendant (Binance), had been duly served and that additional proof of evidence was served on the first defendant through the second defendant (Gambaryan) in accordance with the law.

  • 17-year-old yahoo boy hacks EFCC chairman’s BVN, displays remarkable IT skills

    17-year-old yahoo boy hacks EFCC chairman’s BVN, displays remarkable IT skills

    The chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukoyede, has shared an incident where a 17-year-old successfully hacked into his personal computer and bank account while being questioned at the EFCC office in Lagos.

    Olukoyede invited the young hacker to his office for questioning, saying the teenager was able to bypass the security measures on his locked computer with ease.

    The EFCC chairman disclosed this during a conversation with editors at the EFCC headquarters in Jabi, Abuja.

    He said: “I brought into my Lagos office a seventeen-year-old boy who is studying History and Anthropology. He is in the 200 level. He is not doing anything science-related. The guy sat in my office in Lagos and demonstrated some things to me on my laptop.

    “He asked for my number, I gave him my number and through my number, he got my BVN. He then mentioned the name of my account number to me at the bank. I didn’t tell him anything.

    “The problem is, I see crime in that, and I also see opportunities in it. So, if you leave these guys, we don’t make them know that what they are doing is wrong, if you leave them, they will continue to see it as a way of life to make money.

    “We plead for light sentences so that we can reorientate them and that’s part of what we’re doing. What joy will I derive from sending a 17-year-old boy to jail? You have destroyed his future. You have destroyed his career.

    “Sometimes they give them options of fines and all of that conviction, so we bring them in, lecture them and talk to them.”

    The boy boldly told Olukoyede that he could transfer up to 10 million naira from any account in a single transaction, showcasing his expertise.

    He said the 17-year-old boy, when he was done, said: “Look, oga, I can make 10 million now. I will demonstrate it to you. I will move money from your account to mine.

    Read Also: EFCC should follow due process on Yahaya Bello – Segun Arinze

    “I said no, don’t do that in my office and he was ready to do that. When he opened my laptop, I didn’t give him the key to my laptop and he had access.

    “He has two younger ones. One is in JSS2 and the other is in SSS2. He is the one feeding his parents and responsible for the payment of tuition for his younger ones.

    “I saw a Bill Gates in that guy. I told my family, we were going to do that.

    “I spoke to one of my friends who is also ready to help take up the schooling of the SSS 2 guy. So I’m still looking for someone who will take up the one for the JSS 2 sibling.”

    The EFCC chairman has already disclosed the anti-graft agency’s strategy to pardon and rehabilitate convicted online scammers.

  • EFCC has secured 500 cybercrime convictions, Olukoyede tells Interpol

    EFCC has secured 500 cybercrime convictions, Olukoyede tells Interpol

    The Executive Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Ola Olukoyede, has said the commission had secured 500 convictions in cybercrimes in the last few months.

    Quoting a consultant, he said cybercrime has assumed the third largest gross domestic product (GDP) in the world.

    The EFCC chairman said the commission would not give up because cybercrimes have become organised threats to the development of nations.

    A statement by the spokesman of the commission, Mr. Dele Oyewale, said Olukoyede said this when he hosted a delegation from the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol).

    He said: “EFCC, apart from the police, is one of the prominent, specialised anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria that has the mandate to investigate cybercrimes, and we have been doing that.

    “In the last few months, we have secured over 500 convictions in cybercrimes. Over the years, we have had cause to collaborate with (America’s) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the (United Kingdom’s) National Crime Agency (NCA) and other prominent law enforcement agencies in the world in the area of combating cybercrime.

    “We are much ready to do more and also to encourage the heads of the world to give access to information.”

    Read Also: Sanwo-Olu, Abiru make case for road dualisation

    Olukoyede restated the EFCC’s commitment to the fight against cybercrimes, stressing that they have become organised threats to the development of nations.

    The leader of the delegation, Mr. Craig Jones, explained that Interpol was working as a neutral law enforcement agency with private partners across the world to detect and break criminal networks serving fraudsters. 

    He said: “I think many countries now recognise that cybercrime is actually a national security threat to countries. This goes hand in hand with financial crimes because the main motivation of cybercrime normally for the criminals is that financial gain and the impact that it makes on the countries and our communities is massive.” 

    Jones stressed that Interpol had continued to identify countries with criminal networks in order to assist them to break such networks.

    He added that a CyberCrimes Convention was being negotiated with the United Nations Organisation (UNO) to draw global attention and commitment to fight the menace.

  • Unlawful publication against pastors: Court awards N10m damages against EFCC

    Unlawful publication against pastors: Court awards N10m damages against EFCC

    Justice Isa Dashen of a Federal High Court sitting in Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital, has faulted a publication by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in a national daily on June 8, 2022, declaring Pastor Οyinmiebi Biribena and his wife, Pastor Beatrice Biribena, wanted.

    Bribena is the Pastor in charge Christ Embassy Church in Kumasi, Ghana.

    The judge said the publication was done without a valid court order.

    He said it was thus unjustified, unlawful and unconstitutional.

    In a ruling, Justice Dashen held that the publication violated the couple’s fundamental human rights.

    The judgment was in a suit which the couple filed on June 10, 2022 seeking the enforcement of their fundamental human rights against the EFCC and the commission’s erstwhile spokesman Wilson Umujaren. 

    Read Also: ‘Your days of worrying are over’

    The court entered judgment in favour of the Biribena couple, and resolved the sole issue against the EFCC and Umujaren. 

    It declared that the EFCC’s publication constituted a breach of their fundamental rights to personal liberty, freedom of movement, right to private and family life and dignity of human person as enshrined in sections 34(1), 35(1) 37 and 41(1) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), and Articles 4, 5, 6 and 12(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap A9, Laws of the Federation, 2004.

    Justice Dashen gave an order directing and compelling the EFCC to offer a public apology to the Biribena couple over the “unlawful and unconstitutional” publication.

    The judge also gave an order restraining the EFCC from inviting, harassing, arresting and detaining the couple pending the determination of the suit between Bliss Multinational Perfections Limited and another vs Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

    He awarded N10,000,000.00 as exemplary damages against the EFCC and Umujaren, jointly and severally, for the unlawful infringement of the fundamental rights of the Biribenas and the psychological trauma and humiliation they suffered as a result of the publication.

    In a related suit, Justice Dashen held that the seizure and sealing of Bliss Multinational Perfections Limited’s property at 1 Otiotio Road, Yenezue-Gene, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State (known as Bliss Emporium) by the EFCC was wrong, unlawful and ought to be returned.

    The judge said the property was not built with proceeds of any crime.

  • Face your EFCC case, leave our governors alone, Arewa Youths fires Lamido

    Face your EFCC case, leave our governors alone, Arewa Youths fires Lamido

    Former governor of Jigawa state, Sule Lamido, came under attack from a socio-cultural group – Arewa New Frontiers (ANF) for criticising the initiative of some northern governors in seeking foreign  help to solve the insecurity challenges facing the region. 

    The group told Lamido to leave the governors alone in their bid to find solutions to the insecurity ravaging the region and face his case with the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC).

    Lamido had recently criticised ten governors from Northwest and North Central zones for seeking technical assistance on how to tackle the high rate of insecurity in their regions from United States of America during a two-day symposium organized by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP).

    The former minister of foreign affairs frowned at the governors efforts dismissing the visit and meeting with the American agency as misplaced priority.

    But in a reaction at a press conference in Abuja on Wednesday, the national coordinator of ANF, Abubakar  Lawal said instead of condemnation, the governors deserved commendation of all well meaning Nigerians, arguing that no society can claim monopoly of solution insecurity which has global dimension.

    Admitting that the former governor has right to his opinion, the group noted that Lamido’s outburst of condemning the move by the governors to salvage the high rate of insecurity that has taken over their states over the years before their elective positions as governors was not only uncalled for, wasteful and baseless.

    Lawal said: “We want to believe the former Governor was attacking the Jigawa state Governor, being his governor, but not the 9 other governors because for us he has misfired. Lamido for the avoidance of doubt should face his travails with the EFCC and allow these new set of digital governors find solutions to their problems. 

    Read Also: Senator Lamido distributes 16 trucks of rice, textile materials palliative

    “It is even annoying that a person who has held the foreign affairs portfolio under Obasanjo would be denigrating an international fora meant to find solutions to our problems. It is a shame that he has lost touch with realities. How did he know NIPSS and ASCON were not contacted to find solutions to this challenges. He won’t know, because he is an analogue politician.

    “Lamido as far as we are concerned is a failure and we won’t hesitate to call on the EFCC to dust his case file. 

    It is a fact that the northern states especially the northwest have of recent been most hit by the dare devil activities of bandits and terrorists and the need to go as far as China or across the red sea to find solution to this blight should be a welcome idea instead of condemnation as no one holds the monopoly to knowledge.”

    Expressing optimism on the efforts by the governors, the group maintained that “Nobody can deny the fact that the United States has some of the best security measures across the world and has a long history of helping other nations tackle insecurity effectively with contribution in both intellectual strategies, and weapons acquisition. And as the Katsina State Governor Dikko Radda one of the governors who was part of the visit rightly said ‘sharing experiences and ideas on a global scale was crucial in today’s interconnected world.’

    “Nobody is an island. This visit we believe would help build the capacity and understanding of these governors on what to do and how to effectively tackle this insecurity menace in a more modernized form with new ideas and modern weapons and security strategies that would be alien to the enemies.

    “The world is a global village and just as Sule Lamido suggested that the governors should have engaged on their visit on how to boost Agriculture, health. Who told him the governors went there for security issues only? He will never know because his mindset was just to be relevant for some days.”

  • EFCC arraigns Kwara’s ex-finance commissioner for N1.22b fraud

    EFCC arraigns Kwara’s ex-finance commissioner for N1.22b fraud

    The Ilorin Zonal Command of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned a former commissioner for finance in Kwara State, Ademola Banu, before Justice Evelyn Anyadike of the Federal High Court sitting in Ilorin, over alleged money laundering and misappropriation of state funds to the tune of N1.22billion.

    The defendant was alleged to have among sundry issues, conspired to divert the said sum during the administration of Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed, between May 2011 and May 2019, when he served as the commissioner for finance.

    A statement by the commission’s Head, Media & Publicity, Dele Oyewale, said Banu was to be arraigned alongside his principal, former governor Abdulfatah, on February 23, 2024, but when the case came up, he was absent.

    Read Also: NACA empowers youth corpers with social media skills, tools

     in court and had no legal representation, prompting the court to issue a bench warrant against him upon the application by counsel for the EFCC, Rotimi Jacobs, SAN.

    The court, on the said date, took the plea of former governor Abdulfatah on the 12-count charge preferred against him and his finance commissioner by the EFCC and adjourned till April 29, while ordering the prosecution to produce Banu for trial.

    At the resumed sitting on Monday, the two defendants – Abdulfatah Ahmed and Ademola Banu, who were listed as the first and second defendants in the charge, were present in court.

    When the case was called, A. A. Ajibade, SAN, announced the appearance for Abdulfatah, Gboyega Oyewole, SAN for Banu, while the prosecution team was led by Rotimi Jacobs, SAN.

    Jacobs informed the court that the second defendant who was unavailable at the last sitting when his co-traveler, Abdulfatah, was arraigned, was finally in court to take his plea.

    “My Lord, at the last adjournment, the first defendant (governor Abdulfatah) took his plea, but the second defendant (Banu) was not available in court that day, causing your lordship to issue a bench warrant against him,” he said.

    “Following the order of the court, counsel to the second defendant called me and explained that he would produce his client before the court today, which he has done. I pray the court to allow the charge to be read to him.”

    In response, Banu’s counsel, Oyewole, prayed the court to discharge the bench warrant earlier issued against his client, which Jacobs did not oppose.

    In a short ruling, Justice Anyadike vacated the bench warrant on the second defendant, setting the stage for his arraignment. He was, therefore, ordered to enter the dock to take his plea.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charge when it was read to him.

    Following his plea, Oyewole, SAN, moved a motion for the bail of his client. He prayed the court to grant the application on liberal terms citing the medical conditions of the client as reasons.

    Jacobs, however, did not oppose the application given the earlier ruling.

    Justice Anyadike admitted the second defendant to bail in the sum of N20million with two sureties in like sum, who must have landed property within the jurisdiction of the court. The sureties must deposit three passport photographs with the court’s registrar. The sureties must also produce evidence of payment of electricity bills for the last three months.

    Furthermore, the judge ordered that the sum of N5m be paid as a bond into the litigation account of the Federal High Court by the defendant, which will be returned to him after the final determination of the case, but forfeited to the Federal Government in the event the defendant jumps bail.

    The judge also ordered the defendant to deposit his international passport with the court, adding that the defendant must not travel without the permission of the court, but may apply to get it on medical grounds if the need arises.  Thereafter, the judge ordered the defendant to be remanded in the custody of the EFCC pending the perfection of his bail conditions.

    The case has been adjourned till June 25 and 26, 2024 for trial.

  • EFCC and politics of (in)effective implementation

    EFCC and politics of (in)effective implementation

    By Felix Oladeji

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of Nigeria has been one of the more vocal – and at times controversial – anti-corruption agencies (ACAs) in Africa. It has been instrumental in charging and prosecuting senior political leaders and businessmen with political links, as well as in recovering and repatriating significant stolen resources that belong to the Nigerian state. Yet it is also subject to frequent political interference, which reduces its effectiveness and means that it is often seen as an arm of the incumbent government without an independent mandate. Senior-level functionaries of EFCC are perceived as being not immune to political pressures, which is one reason why the commission has not been able to function credibly, while operational inefficiencies caused by insufficient funding and lack of technical capacity and expertise among staff also undermine the effectiveness of the commission.

    Successive Nigerian governments have tried to tackle corruption through legislation and the creation of anti-corruption agencies. Indeed, there is evidence that appears to suggest that EFCC senior officers do not seem to be immune from political pressures, with some observers having linked the falling rates in prosecution to such interests and selective prosecution. These linkages evidently have a negative impact on public perception of the commission.

    As damaging rent capture is common in Nigeria for structural reasons, the EFCC’s role in tackling some of the more severe instances of corruption is critical. A report by PricewaterhouseCoopers (Pwc) estimates that corruption could cost the Nigerian economy 37 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030, therefore the EFCC plays an important role in reversing this trend. The EFCC is a statutory body with an ambitious mandate, yet it is also subject to frequent political interference which reduces its effectiveness.

    This makes it a unique organisation in the Nigerian political settlement space – it is a reproducible combination of distribution of power and distribution of benefits. Seen in this light, the effectiveness of the EFCC or the outcome of EFCC’s enforcement in terms of successful prosecutions and lower levels of corruption is an interaction of, or contestation between, powerful organisations that have the ability to influence outcomes, and usually not in rule- following ways.

    Read Also: Five things to know about Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway construction

    These organisations are able to use their influence over enforcement in a manner that aids their political interests; and when rules can be thus distorted or infringed, enforcement is usually weak, as is the case in many developing countries including Nigeria. It is equally important to note that these powerful organisations are not coalitions with consistent memberships. Political affiliations are fluid in Nigeria and ruling coalitions can have varying memberships over periods of time, resulting in differential outcomes for the EFCC. While it is safe to say that these outcomes rarely differ in terms of the general levels of corruption and enforcement, they do however differ in terms of the groups of people who are affected.

    Some commentators have suggested that inefficiencies of the Nigerian legal system prevent EFCC from fulfilling its mandate, with the EFCC itself associating some of its challenges to judicial hostility and delay in courts. It is important to note, however, that while delays may persist at the lower courts, the Court of Appeal has sought to mitigate the effect of delays in the justice system by providing for a system of fast-tracking criminal appeals through its 2013 Practice Direction. This legislation mandates that the presiding Justice of each division of the Court of Appeal, in conjunction with the Deputy Chief Registrars of the division, ensures that their registries give priority to the listing, consideration and determination of all applications and substantive appeals related to agencies such as the EFCC, the ICPC and other recognised LEAs. Similar provisions are found in the Supreme Court (Criminal Appeals) Practice Directions 2013. As a result, adjournment on criminal matters that usually take three to four months at the Court of Appeal and possibly as long as seven to eight months at the Supreme Court are now usually adjourned for two weeks to one month with the new Practice Direction.

    In recognition that delayed criminal proceedings prevent effective administration of criminal justice, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court issued their respective practice directions to also mitigate delay in the administration of criminal judges. In Dasuki v Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Supreme Court recognised the necessity of a speedy trial and implored the court and the parties (including their counsel) to avoid any antics aimed at delaying the determination of the matter.

    In respect of inordinate delays in the conclusion of corruption cases, it is important to note that the EFCC Act contains a novel provision in Section 40, which states that an application for stay of proceedings in respect of a criminal matter brought by the EFCC shall not be entertained until judgment is delivered by the High Court. This provision was also introduced into the Administration of Criminal Jurisdiction Act 2015 (ACJA), and in both cases was introduced to prevent the use of frivolous appeals against interlocutory rulings of the trial court pending the final judgment of the said trial court. As previously noted, the 2013 Practice Direction also sought to mitigate the effect of delays in the justice system by providing for a system to fast-track criminal appeals.

    However, legal representatives have relied on technical legal principles such as filing a ‘no case submission’, which is not treated as an interlocutory decision and means that the defence has the right to appeal against any refusal to uphold a submission. One example where this strategy was used is the high-profile case of Walter Wagbatsoma v Federal Republic of Nigeria. The prosecution had charged the accused with the offences of advance fee fraud, obtaining by false pretense and forgery in respect of an oil subsidy scam. When the prosecution closed its case, the defence made a no-case submission which was refused by the trial court; however, in doing so the court considered and ruled on a point of law (the applicability of certain sections of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Act) on which points were not raised by either the prosecution or the defence, and neither was given the opportunity to address the court on these issues. Consequently, at the Supreme Court, the ruling of the trial court on the no-case submission was struck out and the case was remitted back to the trial court for retrial. This happened six years after the case was filed and almost four years after the judgment on the no-case submission was delivered, which shows the impact of such dilatory tactics on the delay and weaknesses in the Nigerian judicial system.

    To further curb delays in the judicial process, the ACJA introduced several other provisions including Section 396 of the ACJA. This provides that upon charging an accused person to court, the trial of the defendant shall proceed from one day to another until the conclusion of the trial, and where it is impracticable to proceed from one day to another, no party to the proceedings shall be entitled to more than five adjournments from arraignment of the accused person to final judgment. Furthermore, the interval between each adjournment shall not exceed fourteen days.

    The ACJA further states that where it is impracticable to conclude criminal proceedings after the parties have exhausted their five adjournments each, the interval between one adjournment to another shall not exceed seven days including weekends. It goes on to provide that in all circumstances the court may award reasonable costs in order to discourage frivolous adjournments. The practicality of this provision of the ACJA has been called into doubt; however, as it does not take into account the quantity of case files (particularly as the courts do not have specialist corruption divisions), or the busy schedule of both defence and prosecution counsels. Furthermore, it does not cater to exigencies such as securing the attendance of witnesses that may prejudice the dispensation of a fair trial, as espoused in Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

    Furthermore, the EFCC is hugely significant politically, which is why policy that could make the commission more effective may be difficult to achieve. While it might be so that procedural and political considerations limit the effectiveness of the EFCC, measures could be put in place to nudge the organisation in the right direction. Hence, the tenure of the Chairperson and Secretary of the EFCC should be fixed and not renewable, and should straddle at least two tenures of a President and Senate (that is between five and six years) to limit political influence over the EFCC. The Board of the EFCC should also have a staggered tenure, with no more than a third of members being appointed by the government in power.

    Also, efforts should be made to undertake an organisational effectiveness map for the EFCC that identifies skill sets that are needed. Lastly, more relevant, targeted and bespoke training programmes should be designed that link to the skills sets that are identified as lacking. Deliberations should continue on the institutional arrangements and focus of the ACAs (EFCC and ICPC) to understand the overlap and to allow for streamlining where needed.

    • Oladeji writes from Lagos, Nigeria.

  • EFCC denies shooting at pro-Yahaya Bello protesters

    EFCC denies shooting at pro-Yahaya Bello protesters

    The Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC),  has denied allegation of shooting at pro Yahaya Bello protesters at its headquarters on Monday in Abuja

    Spokesman for the commission,  Dele Oyewale said this while responding to a video trending on social media on the allegation of attack by the. EFCC operatives on protesters

    Oyewale told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that there was no shooting at any protester at the commission on Monday.

    He said the operatives  only dispersed the protesters who went to the commission’s headquarters to disrupt  activities.

    ”No arrests were made as claimed by the group.

    “” two groups demonstrated at the commission today. The first group came with a letter of commendation in support of  the EFCC anti corruption fight.

    ”They presented their letter, which was received by the Director of Public Enlightenment Department, Mr Wilson Uwujaren, who promised to deliver their message to the chairman.

     ”Not quite long, another group came, these people were violent and destructive, the men of the commission had to chase them away.

    Read Also: Pro-EFCC, pro-Yahaya Bello protesters at agency Hqtrs

    “”It is not true, nobody was arrested and there was no shoot out,” he said.

    NAN reports that the pro-Yahaya Bello, immediate past governor of Kogi came to protest his  alleged political persecution.

    The pro-Bello protest was staged by the Kogi Youth Coalition.

    They claimed they were attacked by  operatives of the commission.

    The group claimed that the first group of protesters were allowed into the  commission but the pro- Yahaya Bello group were denied entry.

    Videos of the protesters struggling to make their statements while being harassed and scampering for safety flooded the social media  with a picture of a badly damaged vehicle.

    The group claimed that at least, 10 of the members were  arrested while many were  injured.

    They said they staged the protest to counter what they described as an EFCC-sponsored protest in their support, and  vowed to resist the intimidation, and urged  President Bola Tinubu to call EFCC to order.

    The Head of the Kogi Youth Coalition, Otitoleke Richard, while speaking  on the attack said:

    “We’re here this morning at the headquarters of EFCC in Abuja, addressing a topical national issue that has to do with the rule of law, the defence of democratic governance in Nigeria.

    “We have been intimidated, we have been harassed. The EFCC is saying we do not have the right to express our opinion on national issues.

    ” We have been shot at; they have used their stick to beat ordinary Nigerians that are harmless.

    “We shall continue to air our opinion for democracy to thrive in Nigeria. Nigeria is not a Banana Republic.

    ”We’re saying the rule of law must be applied in all corruption files. You cannot fight corruption with lawlessness.”

    A protester, who simply identified himself as Malik, said it was unfortunate that peaceful protests that were a right of every Nigerian had now been made selective by the commission.

    “Why didn’t they attempt to disperse those Igala boys that protested against the former governor, can you imagine? EFCC sponsoring Muri Ajaka’s boys to come and support them and call Yahaya Bello out?

    “Nigerians should not be fooled to think anybody is fighting any corruption. They just want him out. Period.

    ”But we are saying they can’t disgrace him. He has done more than any governor for us in Kogi  and all these people know.

     This will not make us afraid of asking for our rights. We will continue,” he said.

    (NAN)

  • Money laundering probe: EFCC swoops on 1, 146 bank accounts

    Money laundering probe: EFCC swoops on 1, 146 bank accounts

    •Court okays freezing of accounts for unauthorised forex dealings, terror financing

    The Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an interim order empowering the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to freeze 1,146 bank accounts belonging to individuals and companies.
    The agency claimed it was investigating them for unauthorised dealing in foreign exchange, money laundering and terrorism financing.
    Justice Emeka Nwite issued the order in a ruling on an ex-parte motion by EFCC lawyer Ekele Iheanacho.
    The judge ordered the commission to ensure that its investigation is concluded within 90 days.
    Justice Nwite, after listening to Iheanacho, held: “It is hereby ordered as follows: that the applicant’s application is hereby granted as prayed.
    “That an order of this honourable court is hereby made freezing the bank accounts stated in the schedule below which accounts are owned by various individuals who are currently being investigated in a case involving the offences of unauthorised dealing in foreign exchange, money laundering and terrorism financing to the extant that the investigation will be for a period of 90 days.”
    He adjourned till July 23 for a report on the findings.
    A copy of the enrolled order, made last Wednesday, was obtained yesterday.
    The EFCC, in the motion marked FHC/ABJ/CS/543/2024 said: “The bank accounts in respect of which the reliefs are sought are subject of investigation by the EFCC in relation to money laundering and terrorism financing.

    Read Also: Alleged illegal forex trading: Court okays EFCC’s freezing of 1,146 accounts


    “Preliminary investigation conducted thus far reveals that the bank accounts are linked to persons, who take advantage of the virtual cryptocurrency exchange platforms to illegally manipulate the value of the naira and launder proceeds of unlawful activities.
    “There is a need to preserve the funds in the identified bank accounts pending the conclusion of investigation and possible prosecution.”
    On February 29, Justice Nwite issued a similar order compelling Binance Holdings Limited to provide EFCC with the comprehensive data or information of all persons from Nigeria trading on its platform.
    The interim order granted was to enable the EFCC investigate the allegations of money laundering and terrorism financing raised against Binance, a crypto currency trading platform.
    In a motion it filed, the EFCC claimed that it uncovered users of Binance platform deploying it for price discovery, confirmation and market manipulation which caused tremendous distortions in the market, resulting in the naira losing its values against other currencies.
    The EFCC added that the information provided its investigating team by Binance showed that the total trading volume from Nigeria in 2023 alone stood at $21.6 billion.
    The anti-graft agency filed a charge against Binance and two of its executives on alleged money laundering, while the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) filed another charge against them.
    Binance and its two officials are currently being prosecuted before a Federal High Court in Abuja by the EFCC and the FIRS on two separate charges bordering on money laundering and tax offences.