Tag: Ekiti governorship poll

  • INEC witness to tribunal: Ekiti poll free, fair

    A Deputy Director General of the John Kayode Fayemi Campaign Organisation, Mr Aduwon Rufus Sunday, yesterday told the Ekiti Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal sitting at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Apo, Abuja, the nation’s capital, that the July 14 poll was free, fair and credible by all standards.

    Sunday averred that contrary to the allegations of bias, violence, vote-buying and general malpractices by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Prof Olusola Kolapo, who are the petitioners, the election was devoid of rancour and violence.

    Led in evidence by Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), counsel to Governor John Kayode Fayemi, the witness informed the tribunal, headed by Justice Suleiman Belgore, that officials of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) were not biased against any party.

    The witness maintained that it would be a daydream for anybody or group to say that the election was not free, fair, credible and acceptable.

    Sunday, who claimed to be in the situation room established by the campaign organisation to monitor the election, told the tribunal that he never got any report of violence, vote-buying and malpractice.

    The witness said all agents of political parties who participated in the election signed the result sheets.

    He said: “It is not true that INEC favoured John Kayode Fayemi in the election. The allegation of vote-buying is also not true. In fact, the election was among the best conducted by INEC.”

    Under cross-examination by Chief Roland Otaru (SAN), counsel to the petitioners, the witness, who tendered the judgment of FCT High Court delivered by Justice Othman Musa, said he was not a member of the Action People’s Party (APP), which instituted the case that sought to disqualify Governor Fayemi from contesting the July 14 election but was dismissed by the court.

    The witness admitted that his disposition on oath was based on the reports he obtained from other All Progressives Congress (APC) agents during the election.

    The PDP and Prof Kolapo filed the petition, praying the tribunal to declare them as winners of the election on the ground that they scored majority of the lawful votes.

    They alleged that the victory of Governor Fayemi was as the result of vote-buying, widespread rigging, malpractices.

    According to them, INEC officials favoured the governor during the election.

    Also, Fayemi, who was present at yesterday’s proceeding, told reporters that he was confident the tribunal will do justice to all issues raised by the petitioners.

    His lawyer, Fagbemi, expressed optimism that the tribunal would complete hearing of the petition within the time allowed by law due to the steady progress being made by the tribunal and cooperation of counsel to parties.

     

  • INEC to close case today in Ekiti governorship poll dispute

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced plans to close its defence today as the first defendant in the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate in the last governorship election in Ekiti State, Prof Kolapo Olusola.

    Olusola and PDP are challenging the outcome of the June 14 governorship election, which INEC said the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr Kayode Fayemi, won.

    INEC’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN), told the Ekiti State Governorship Election Tribunal, sitting in Abuja, yesterday, that he intended to close his client’s defence today.

    INEC, APC and Fayemi are listed as first, second and third respondents in the petition by the PDP and Olusola.

    Edowomwan tendered, yesterday, certified true copies (CTC) of election results from some registration centres in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti South West, Emure and Ilejemeje local government areas.

    Lawyers to the APC and Fayemi, Mr Aking Olujinmi (SAN) and Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), did not object to the tendering of the results contained in Forms EC40G.

    Lawyer to the petitioners, Rowland Otaru (SAN), objected to the admission of the results, but said he would give reasons for his objection at the stage of address.

    Tribunal Chairman, Justice Suleiman Belgore, admitted the copies of the results as exhibits.

    At a point, Edosomwan sought an adjournment to enable him get more copies of the results, which he said would be brought from Ekiti today.

    He said he intended to close the first defendant’s case today, after tendering the next set of results.

    Otaru, Olujinmi and Fagbemi did not object to Edosomwan’s request for an adjournment.

    Justice Belgore adjourned till noon today.

    INEC has called about 16 witnesses since it opened its defence on November 5. The commission and the other respondents are allocated 10 days each to present their case.

    The petitioners, who were allocated 14 days, called about 71 witnesses and tendered documentary evidence from October 17 when they opened their case.

    At the conclusion of INEC’s defence, it would be the turn of APC to present its defence, following which the tribunal will invite Fayemi to also present his defence.

  • ‘PDP’s votes voided in Ekiti governorship poll’

    An Ekiti State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal sitting at the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Apo, Abuja, heard yesterday that votes for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) were allegedly voided by some workers of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the July 14 governorship election.

    A witness, Omobuljo Bankole, said PDP’s votes were voided at Unit 009, Ward 4 of Ido-Osi Local Government Area.

    Bankole was testifying before the tribunal, headed by Justice Suleiman Belgore.

    Answering a question during cross-examination by Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC), the witness said his party polled over 119 votes during the election in his unit.

    He said: “I was there when they deliberately voided the PDP’s votes in Unit 9 (Ward 4, Ido-Osi Local Government Area). The male polling clerk of the INEC voided 27 votes,” he said.

    The matter continues today.

    The petitioners, PDP, and its candidate in the Ekiti July 14 governorship election, Prof. Olusola Kolapo, prayed the tribunal to challenge the outcome of the election.

    The respondents in the suit are: the INEC, APC and Governor Kayode Fayemi.

     

  • Lessons from Ekiti governorship poll

    The governorship election in Ekiti State was the most keenly contested in its history, with the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, emerging winner. Governor Ayo Fayose lost in his bid to install Prof. Kolapo Olusola of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as his successor. ODUNAYO OGUNMOLA examines the factors which worked against the PDP and those that aided the APC’s victory.

    The July 14 governorship election marked another watershed in the history of Ekiti State. There will be power shift on October 16.

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) is on its way to power after dethroning the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). It is regaining the power it lost in the June 21, 2014 poll.

    The broom party and its leaders have been savouring the joy of victory.

    It was a “sweet revenge” for the APC and its governorship candidate, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, who endured the pain of losing the crown, despite his performance in office during his first term.

    But the tide has changed, with the declaration of Fayemi as the governor-elect by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The bitter pill of defeat was forced down the throats of outgoing Governor Ayo Fayose and his protégé, Prof. Kolapo Olusola.

    Fayemi, the APC candidate, polled 197, 459 votes. Olusola, the PDP flag bearer, garnered 178, 121 votes.

    Fayose lost his local government area (Irepodun/Ifelodun) to APC, despite his towering stature as the governor, party leader, chairman of PDP Governors’ Forum and a presidential aspirant.

    That Fayose was rejected in his council was an indication that his popularity has declined sharply and this may do an incalculable damage to his presidential ambition.

    It was a dramatic twist of fate for Fayemi, who left office on October 15, 2014, amidst controversies that surrounded that year’s election.

    Fayose staged a comeback in 2018, eight years after leaving power. Fayemi has staged a comeback after four years outside the Government House.

    Fayose tried many tricks and to prevent the pain of handing over power to the man he upstaged, blackmailed and pilloried endlessly. He did everything possible, including a ten-year ban from public office, to stop Fayemi. But, fate had other ideas for Fayemi.

    Some of the actions taken by the wily Fayose in the run-up to the election included the collection of workers’ Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) and writing down the Voters’ Identification Numbers (VINs) in a bid to give his candidate an advantage at the poll; promotion of 45,000 workers without payment of the promotion arrears; the recruitment of 2,000 new workers and payment of N3,000 into accounts of workers and pensioners as ‘mobilisation’ for the election.

    On July 10 when President Muhammadu Buhari was in town to campaign for Fayemi, Fayose ordered commercial drivers and motorcyclists off the streets to ensure that APC members were stranded to embarrass APC national leaders with an empty stadium.

    The most egregious pre-election trick was the alleged contrived theatricals of “teargas attack by mystery policemen in the presence of his security aides” a situation that has him to wear a neck brace since then.

    The drama was believed to have been hatched to whip up sympathy, which was achieved to a large extent.

    The election was full of surprises. For the first time in Ekiti, the candidate that won in the two largest towns, Ado and Ikere, failed to win the governorship seat, unlike what it used to be in the past.

    Although Olusola won in the two Fayemi narrowed the gap to ensure that the lead achieved by the defeated candidate did not damage his chances.

    Having succeeded in narrowing his rival’s lead in the four council areas where Olusola won, Fayemi leveraged on the votes in the grassroots where he got substantial votes to get the crown.

    The four council areas won by Olusola are Ado, Ikere, Efon and Emure.

    Fayemi won in 12 council areas of Moba, Ido/Osi, Ilejemeje, Oye, Ikole, Ekiti East, Gbonyin, Ise/Orun, Ekiti Southwest, Ekiti West, Ijero and Irepodun/Ifelodun.

    The analysis of the result shows that Fayemi won all the five LGAs in Ekiti North senatorial district where he hails from, four out of six LGAs in Ekiti South Senatorial District where Olusola hails from and three out of five LGAs in Ekiti Central senatorial district.

    For the first time in 19 years, PDP lost its hitherto strongholds in Ekiti where it had been winning elections. They are Ido/Osi, Ijero and Ise/Orun local government areas.

    Fayemi leveraged on the votes of core civil servants (workers in ministries, departments and agencies), voters at the grassroots (in appreciation of projects he executed there during first term), Hausa and Ebira communities.

    Olusola enjoyed the backing of primary and secondary school teachers and local government workers who are die-hard loyalists of Fayose, although they are being owed arrears.

    Fayemi would have won by a higher margin, but the label of herdsmen crisis hung on his party (APC) made many voters changed their mind to vote for PDP.

    Polarisation of pdp/imposition of candidate

    Fayose’s decision to anoint Olusola as his preferred candidate almost a year to the election signaled the beginning of the end of the PDP four-year hegemony. The decision caught many prominent PDP governorship aspirants, leaders and members unawares and triggered their exit in droves to other parties, particularly the APC.

    The time lag between the announcement of Olusola as his successor and the time of the election (ten months) gave Fayose’s ‘opponents’ within the party an ample time to plan a counter-strategy PDP went into the election as a “divided house.”

    The governor personalised the party, took its official businesses to the Government House rather than the state party secretariat, imposed candidates for offices based on his whims and caprices and cracked down on anybody who challenged him.

    Fayose forgot that he rode into power in 2014 on a united coalition of leaders and members who held the fort in their units, wards and local government areas to ensure that he won convincingly.

    Allowing prominent party leaders, like Senator Clement Awoyelu, Prof. Tunde Adeniran, Prince Dayo Adeyeye, Chief Adebisi Omoyeni, Chief Abiodun Aluko, Dr. Sikiru Lawal, Ambassador Dare Bejide and Mr. Owoseni Ajayi, to leave the party was a “political suicide.”

    All what the aggrieved leaders asked for was an assurance of a transparent primary. But, Adeyeye who participated in the primary, had to leave over Fayose’s alleged intimidation and order that delegates for the primary must wear the same cloth to identify those who voted for his preferred candidate.

    The aggrieved PDP members saw the APC as a sanctuary and they flocked there in droves after their former party became polarised.

    These party leaders who could not tolerate Fayose’s alleged dictatorship and arrogance had no option than to leave the party while others who did not leave were not committed to the election because of their sidelining.

    Fayose ought to have stooped to conquer by doing everything possible to prevent Adeyeye, who has a large bloc of supporters in the party, from leaving. But, he called the former minister’s bluff.

    The governor failed to manage the post-primary crisis believing that he has the party and the state in his pocket.

    That Adeyeye’s home base, Ise/Orun, a hitherto PDP stronghold, fell to the APC was a protest vote against Fayose whom they believed worked against their son’s governorship ambition.

    The votes won by APC in Ise/Orun cancelled out the gains made by Olusola in his native Ikere.

     Disunity in Olusola’s hometown and the Olukere factor

    Any candidate hoping to win election must profit well from the “homeboy factor”. He must win well in his unit, ward, hometown, local government area and senatorial district and expects that everything goes well in other places. That was not the case with Olusola.

    His hometown, Ikere, was divided. Signs that all was not well in the town manifested with the fact that the town produced three other governorship candidates who ran on the platform of different parties.

    Two former deputy governors, Chief Abiodun Aluko and Chief Adebisi Omoyeni, ran on the platforms of Accord and Mega Party of Nigeria respectively while Mr. Tosin Ajibare contested on the platform of Independent Democrats.

    APC enjoys a  strong followership in Ikere and the party members do not believe in an Olusola candidacy and were ready to vote for the candidate of their party despite the perceived threats not to do so.

    Fayose’s celebrated confrontation with the Olukere of Ikere, Ganiyu Obasoyin, damaged Olusola’s chances a great deal because of the massive followership he (Obasoyin) commands in the town.

    The remand of Obasoyin in prison custody for about one month on a murder case believed by his followers to be a trumped up charge without thinking of its political consequences affected Olusola in the town.

    Olukere’s followers and sympathisers who believed that the governor victimised him dumped the son of the soil and mobilised for Fayemi on election day. The APC flag bearer got more votes in Odo Oja, Oke Osun, Oke’kere and Afao Quarters.

    Had Olusola secured bloc votes from Ikere, the result of the governorship poll would have been a different story all together.

    Unity in apc and absence of post-primary crisis

    Thirty three aspirants showed interest in the APC governorship ticket. There were fears that the party would implode.

    Although the first primary held on May 5 ended in a fiasco when violence reared its ugly head, the repeat primary held on May 12 amidst tight security was successful and produced a result acceptable to the aspirants.

    Fayemi’s deft move in visiting the co-contestants few hours after the primary was conducted was a masterstroke that prevented the party from being plunged into chaos.

    The governor-elect also set up a Candidate Advisory Committee, which incorporates all the aspirants and senior party leaders were gestures of their inclusion in the governorship project.

    Two of the candidates, Mr. Opeyemi Bamidele and Mr. Bamidele Faparusi, served as Director General and Deputy Director-General of the Fayemi Campaign Council respectively.

    The efforts of APC national leaders President Buhari, former National Chairman, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun; National Leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu; former Interim National Chairman, Chief Adebisi Akande- saved the party from being consumed by a post-primary crisis.

    The President’s gesture of inviting the aspirants to a dinner at Aso Rock Villa with the national leaders disarmed any of the contenders that may be planning to work against Fayemi’s victory.

    It is on record that no aspirant left the APC after the primary; they were united behind Fayemi to achieve victory for their party and followed him to many parts of the state to campaign.

    This helped Fayemi to concentrate on campaign with peaked with the flag off and final mega rallies attended by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and President Buhari respectively.

     Federal Government’s support for apc

    The APC and its candidate, Fayemi, enjoyed the backing of the Federal Government in terms of deployment of manpower, resources and materials.

    Buhari alluded to this at the dinner with the aspirants when he promised to give maximum support to the party’s candidate.

    During the valedictory Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting held in honour of Fayemi when he was leaving the cabinet as Minister of Mines and Steel Development, the President promised to attend the governor-elect’s swearing-in in October.

    Fayemi’s governorship project was backed by fellow ministers, heads of federal agencies, governors and National Assembly members elected on the APC platform.

    All of them worked together to ensure victory for their man and it is on record that Oshiomhole leveraged on his experience as a labour leader to meet labour unions in Ekiti governors met with their indigenes and this worked to an extent in Fayemi’s favour.

    Alleged anti-people policies

    Fayose executed some policies perceived to be harsh, which set him against some stakeholders. One of the perceived anti-people policies of the Fayose was the imposition of higher taxes without due consultation with those to be affected. The taxes affected shop owners, market women, butchers, lorry and tipper owners, hoteliers.

    The most controversial of the taxes is the N1,000 education levy imposed on each pupil in private and public secondary schools in a state that enjoyed free education under the last administration.

    Owners of vehicles parked in unauthorised places paid N10,000 to recover their vehicles which residents perceived as too exorbitant.

    The second round of demolition of houses to give way for the urban renewal project of the Fayose administration sparked a big controversy in Ado-Ekiti. It displaced thousands of residents.

    Fayose also had a face-off with petrol dealers when some suspected thugs vandalised their filling stations in the heat of disagreement with their union.

    The development led to a three-week strike by fuel dealers, which imposed hardship on residents many of whom travelled to neighbouring states to buy the commodity.

    Many private companies and corporate organisations, including Guaranty Trust Bank and Coca Cola were forced to close shop over perceived harsh policies with many Ekiti indigenes working there losing their jobs.

     Neglect of rural areas

    PDP lost large chunk of votes in the rural areas because most of the communities did not feel the impact of Fayose’s government.

    Fayose concentrated development projects to Ado and Ikere to a large extent and eight other big towns unlike Fayemi who spread development projects to the remotest parts of the state during his tenure.

    This explained why he (Fayemi) garnered much votes in the grassroots than Olusola.

  • Ekiti governorship poll: Police arraign 10 for vote-buying

    The police on Friday arraigned tens persons before an Ado-Ekiti Chief Magistrate’s Court for their alleged involvement in vote- buying during last Saturday’s governorship election in Ekiti State.

    Police prosecutor Femi Fa³ade to³d the court that they allegedly offered money to voters to induce them to vote for their parties at the poll.

    Falade said the offence contravened Section 130 (a) and 130 (b) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended).

    The accused persons are Olowosile Eunice, Ajayi Modupe, Ayodele Omolara, Suliat Habib, Udoh Anthony, Oyebola Kemi, Roseline Tunde, Odunayo Toyin and Babalola Esther.

    Falade said that the accused persons and others at large, whose addresses were not disclosed in court ýcommitted the offence on July 13 at Ojaoba shopping complex in Ado-Ekiti.

    He alleged that Olowosile Eunice, did corruptly offered money to other accused persons to unduly influence them to vote for her political party during the July 14, governorship election in Ekiti State.

    He also alleged that, Ajayi Modupe and other accused persons, being voters, did corruptly accept money from Olowosile Eunice to vote at the Ekiti State Governorship Election held on July 14, 2018.

    The prosecutor asked the court for an adjournment to enable him study the case file and assemble his witnesses.

    The defendants pleaded not guilty.

    The defence counsel,  Mr Chris Omokhafe,  ýurged the court to grant the defendants bail, promising that they would not jump bail.

    The Chief Magistrate, Mr Adesoji Adegboye, in his ruling granted the defendants bail in the sum of N50,000 with one surety each in like sum.

    The case was adjourned till August 9 for hearing.

  • Fayemi begins governorship campaign Friday

    The former Minister of Mines and Steel Development, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, will arrive Ekiti State on Friday for commencement of his governorship election campaign.

    Fayemi, who resigned as minister on Wednesday, is the All Progressive Congress (APC) candidate in the July 14 governorship election in Ekiti.

    According to a statement issued on Thursday by the Fayemi Campaign Office and signed by Mr. Wole Olujobi, the candidate will be received at the Akure Airport by party leaders for the onward journey to Ekiti.

    The statement said Fayemi would be received by Ekiti people in Ikere-Ekiti where he would make brief stops to address the people.

    The ex-governor will also stop at the party secretariat in Ado-Ekiti and other designated places in the state capital to address the people before travelling to Isan for a reception that will herald the commencement of his campaign for the poll.

    The statement praised the former minister for serving the country diligently.

     

  • We won’t allow Fayose to manipulate Ekiti primary – Adeyeye

    We won’t allow Fayose to manipulate Ekiti primary – Adeyeye

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship aspirant in Ekiti State, Prince Dayo Adeyeye, has declared that Governor Ayo Fayose would not be allowed to manipulate the party’s primary.

    He said Fayose’s endorsement of his deputy, Prof. Kolapo Olusola, “no longer holds water with the verdict of the David Mark-led panel that all aspirants would be allowed to partake in a credible shadow election.”

    According to him, the national leadership of the party has assured all aspirants of a level playing field at the governorship primary to be conducted at a yet-to-be-identified date in the state.

    Adeyeye, who spoke on Monday while featuring on an interview programme on Voice 89.9 FM, said the Reconciliation Panel led by former Senate President, David Mark, has recommended that all aspirants be allowed to participate in the primary.

    Speaking through the Director of Publicity, Prince Adedayo Adeyeye Movement (PAAM), Chief Niyi Ojo, the governorship aspirant said Governor Fayose has agreed to support any aspirant who wins the primary.

    He said: “The governor has understood that it is better for the party to win this election, so nobody will be intimidated, harassed and punished for supporting any aspirant.

    “Fayose has agreed to support any aspirant who wins the primary. The eternal joy the governor will have is to have continuity of PDP and not continuity of any particular aspirant.

    “The endorsement of Eleka (Olusola) holds no water.  We will all go for the primary and I know that my principal (Adeyeye) will win the primary.

    “Those that will organise the primary will not be lodged at the Government House. If anybody believes that Fayose will write the list of delegates, such a thing will not happen.”

  • DSS launches probe into Ekiti governorship poll fraud

    DSS launches probe into Ekiti governorship poll fraud

    •Aluko continues testimony tomorrow 

    Former Secretary of the Ekiti State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Secretary, Dr. Temitope Aluko, has been answering questions from the Department of State Services (DSS) concerning his allegations of massive rigging of the 2014 governorship election in the state.

    The first round of interrogation was conducted in Abuja on Friday with the second round due to follow tomorrow, The Nation gathered yesterday.

    Aluko, speaking on Channels Television last week, alleged collusion between the PDP, Fayose and security officials in rigging the election.

    Of note is the allegation that former President Goodluck Jonathan released $37million to Fayose for the prosecution of the election wich Fayose won, defeating the then incumbent Dr. Kayode Fayemi.

    $2million of the sum was allegedly released for the PDP primaries which Fayose won conveniently and the balance of $35million for the election proper.

    The former PDP scribe had earlier appeared before the Nigerian Army Board of Inquiry chaired by Maj.-Gen. Adeniyi Oyebade, which investigated the roles played by its officers and men where he gave evidence and tendered sensitive documents.

    Aluko was grilled on Friday by the DSS on all he knew about the alleged compromise of the Ekiti governorship election.

    A source as the DSS office in Abuja confirmed yesterday that Aluko tendered many documents, which would assist the security agency in its investigations especially on “issues bordering on state security.”

    The source said an interactive conference has been scheduled for tomorrow during which Aluko will face a larger panel of investigators to shed more light on the issues surrounding the alleged compromise of the poll.

    The source said: “Dr. Aluko was invited by the DSS High Command in Abuja to make clarifications on his allegations and give details on what transpired before, during and after poll.

    “Dr. Aluko is now in the DSS custody and he is okay there as he sees this as his patriotic duty to the nation especially in his desire to let Nigerians know that the Ekiti governorship poll was neither free nor fair as the world was made to believe.

    “There are so many issues to shed light on. His interrogators want him to dot the i’s and cross the t’s most especially issues bordering on state security about the Ekiti governorship election.

    “After the preliminary interaction with Dr. Aluko, the DSS officials are planning an interactive conference with him on Monday which may involve a larger team of investigators.

    “From the way things are going, Dr. Aluko may be the guest of DSS till Tuesday because the Monday’s interactive conference may last a whole day.

    “The DSS officers were not hostile but they were very inquisitive asking so many questions with details.

    “The federal government is monitoring the situation because it has gotten so many messages from the revelations of Dr. Aluko since the new broke.”

    Meanwhile, a member of the seventh House of Representatives, Hon Bamidele Faparusi, has called on the federal government to try those who allegedly conspired with Fayose to rig the Ekiti governorship election.

    Faparusi, an All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftain, described the revelations of the embattled Secretary of Peoples Democratic Party, Dr. Aluko as mind-boggling.

    Speaking with reporters in Ado Ekiti yesterday, Faparusi said making those implicated in the alleged electoral malfeasance should face justice with a view to  sanitizing  the country’s electoral process.

    Faparusi described the bench warrant issued against Aluko by a Magistrate court in Ado Ekiti on Wednesday as “rather preposterous and misdirected”.

  • Tribunal delivers judgment on Ekiti governorship poll Friday

    The Justice Siraju Mohammed-led tribunal has fixed Friday for judgment in the petition filed by the All Progressives Congress (APC) against the outcome of the June 21 governorship election in Ekiti State.

    Justice Mohammed, who is the tribunal chairman, on Wednesday, chose December 19 for judgment after lawyers, representing parties to the petition, adopted their final written addresses.

    Respondents to the petition are the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Fayose, the Independent National Electoral Commission) , the Chief of Army Staff and the Inspector General of Police.

    Before adopting his final address, the petitioner’s lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), reminded the tribunal that, as against the impression created by the defendants, the petition was predicated on the fact that Fayose was not qualified to contest the election.

    He urged the court to allow the petition and dismiss the responses by the five respondents.

    Lawyers to the respondents, including Yusuf Ali (SAN), Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), Abayomi Sadiku and Abdulkadir Ajana argued that the petitioner had failed to prove its case.

    They also argued that the petitioner was unable to provide cogent evidence to support its petition. They urged the tribunal dismiss the petition.

    The APC, in the petition,urged the tribunal to “unravel the hidden facts surrounding the election,” contending that the election was more of “a mechanical exercise than conventional casting of votes.”

     

     

  • That Fayose-Bamidele entente cordiale

    That Fayose-Bamidele entente cordiale

    One of the distinguishing features of the June 21 Ekiti governorship poll was the unprecedented collaboration between the supposedly progressive politician and House of Representatives member, Opeyemi Bamidele, and the Governor-elect, Ayodele Fayose, the conservative who passes himself off both as a progressive and pragmatist. Before the poll, the two entered into a gentleman’s agreement to join forces to help Mr Fayose sweep the poll. The agreement was disseminated in hushed tones, but reporters still got wind of it, and attributed the woeful showing of Mr Bamidele in the election to the fact that he had surrendered his goodwill to Mr Fayose’s cause.

    If anyone doubted the existence of the entente cordiale or its potency, Mr Baimdele himself gloatingly told a newspaper last week that among the reasons Governor Kayode Fayemi lost the election was his unbridled pride. But if so-called progressives could smother one another in this fashion, like a husband who slept with a whore to punish his wife, then they are in more trouble than they imagine. And judging from Femi Fani-Kayode’s volte face – apostasy, some say – we must ask how on earth progressives recruit politicians into their leadership cadre?

    In 2015, Mr Bamidele will likely have his path to the Senate paved by Mr Fayose, except he chooses something more exotic, something more mercantilist. By coming out openly to identify with Mr Fayose, he has indicated a permanent split with his erstwhile political family, a family that I have always argued is held together by the most tenuous of threads. More, the new conservative cum pragmatic alliance in Ekiti all but exemplifies the difficulty in assigning ideological colouration and conviction to Nigerian politicians. The leading political parties, especially the PDP and the APC, are still roughly cast in ideological colours, and mouth programmes along lines that show their leanings. Not so the politicians themselves. They migrate very liberally across the divides and flirt as expediently as their whims carry them, incommoded by our protestations and outrage.

    The greater burden is on the APC, given its proselytising tendency, to firm up its ideological disposition and scrupulously vet those it admits into its leadership. The PDP basks in its expansive disposition to welcome everyone irrespective of his background and conviction. The APC cannot hope to match the PDP on that all-comers’ turf. It must rely on its distinguishing properties, its intuitive embrace of political morality, its instinctive and adaptable humanism. As its politics in Ekiti showed, the APC has not always got its priorities right, nor has it found ways to concretise its philosophy of governance, let alone stay faithful to the ideals of its founding. It must urgently address its mistakes if the Ekiti poll and all other prospective entente cordiales are not to turn its momentary defeat into a permanent rout.