Tag: el-Rufai

  • ICPC arraigns El-Rufai’s ally, Amadu Sule in ₦311bn money laundering suit

    ICPC arraigns El-Rufai’s ally, Amadu Sule in ₦311bn money laundering suit

    The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has arraigned Amadu Sule, Managing Director of TMDK Terminal Limited and a known associate of former Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir el-Rufai, over an alleged ₦311 billion money laundering scheme.

    Sule was arraigned before the Federal High Court sitting in Kaduna on a five-count charge bordering on money laundering and unlawful retention of proceeds of fraud, contrary to the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

    According to the charge sheet filed by the ICPC, Sule allegedly exercised control over more than ₦311 billion traced to accounts held with Fidelity Bank, Stanbic IBTC, and Providus Bank. The funds were reportedly received from INT Towers Limited, IHS Nigeria Ltd, IHS Towers NG Ltd, and Boaz Commodities Limited, purportedly for the supply of petroleum products.

    The anti-graft agency contends that Sule reasonably ought to have known that the funds constituted proceeds of unlawful activity.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Sule swears in commissioners, dissolves TSC members in Nasarawa

    ICPC further alleges that Sule and TMDK Terminal Limited unlawfully retained the tax components of the disputed transactions, amounting to hundreds of billions of naira, despite allegedly being aware that the underlying transactions were fraudulent.

    The Commission describes the actions as direct handling and retention of illicit proceeds, exposing both the individual and the company to enhanced penalties under Sections 18(3) and 18(4) of the Act.

    The charges were signed by Dr. Osuobeni Ekoi Akponimisingha, Head of ICPC’s High-Profile Prosecution Department, underscoring the gravity of the case. Legal analysts note that the involvement of the Commission’s high-profile prosecution unit reflects both the national importance and political sensitivity of the matter.

    The case has drawn significant public attention due to TMDK Terminal Limited’s longstanding business and political associations with the el-Rufai family, including former Governor Nasir el-Rufai and his elder brother, Bashir El-Rufai, who are widely believed to have maintained close dealings with the company during and after Nasir el-Rufai’s tenure as governor.

    The matter has been adjourned to January 15 for the hearing of the accused’s bail application.

  • Letter to Malam El-Rufai

    Letter to Malam El-Rufai

    Dear Mallam Nasir El-Rufai,

    • By Sunday Wale Adeniran

    Season’s greetings to you, your excellency.

    Sir, as a former minister of the federal capital territory and governor of a multi religious and multi ethnic Kaduna state, you are a statesman.

    And therefore, you should act as one in all situations either favourable where you are in government or unfavourable where you are out of government.

    Mallam, I wonder if you read the post you shared on what the writer called marginalization of the northern Muslims by the present administration and hold responsible the administration for the underdevelopment, poverty and insecurity in the north.

    I hope you did not read it before sharing it but I can only hope, I don’t think that given your past utterances and actions and inactions, you did not read it.

    If wishes were horses…

    Mallam, the writer whose thought you shared cunningly picked some northern Muslims including yourself as people who this government is persecuting.

    The writer also mentioned the tussle over the seat of the Emir of Kano. Tinubu was never a governor in Kano state.

    Read Also: NAFDAC alerts Nigerians over recalled Indomie noodles linked to France

    He said that the first lady usually visit and make donation to certain part of the north but not the Muslim dominated areas in the zone but when Seyi Tinubu donated during Ramadan , he did not include it in his write up. He did not say that same northerners said that after making their people poor, he was giving them peanuts.

    As a little boy, I used to count on my fingers the number of leaders Nigeria has had back then, and in my little innocent mind, I used to wonder why it was largely a section of the country that was producing leaders (civilian and military).

    I would remember Tafawa Balewa as the first and only prime minister between 1957 to 1966. Yes, many people did not know that Balewa became Nigeria prime minister before independence. He was called Chief Minister.

    That was nine years.

    Between January and July, 1966, a southerner, Aguiyi Ironsi ruled as a military leader.

    That was six months.

    Yakubu Gowon, yes a Christian but a northerner ruled between 1966 and 1975.

    Another nine years.

    Then another northerner, a Muslim, Murtala Mohammed ruled between July 1975 and February 1976 when he was assassinated in a failed coup.

    He ruled for almost 7 months.

    Then a southern Christian, Olusegun Obasanjo took over and ruled for three years.

    Obasanjo handed over to a northern Muslim, Shehu Shagari.

    Shehu Shagari was in charge between 1979 and 1983.

    (Then as I grew up, the trend continued.)

    That was four years when a northern Muslim, Muhammadu Buhari overthrew his government.

    Between 1983 and 1985, Buhari was in charge.

    Ibrahim Babangida, a northern Muslim overthrew him in a palace coup and IBB was the military president between 1985 and 1993 when he reluctantly left office after annuling the first presidential election won by a southerner, Bashorun Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Olanbiwoninu Abiola.

    So Babangida ruled for eight years.

    He handed over to Ernest Shonekan’s interim government as a mere placeholder for his friend, Sani Abacha.

    Shonekan’s government was from August to November 1993.

    That was three months when Abacha who was fh minister of defence made him resign and announced himself as the new Nigerian leader.

    Sani Abacha was another northern Muslim.

    He ruled between 1993 and 1998. So he ruled for five years.

    Abdusalami Abubakar, a northern Muslim succeeded him after he had died in office in July, 1998 and he was the leader until May 29, 1999.

    That was about ten months.

    Olusegun Obasanjo came this time as a civilian president and from 1999 and 2007, he was the leader.

    That was eight years.

    He was succeeded by Umaru Musa Yar’adua who was president from May 2007 and May 2010.

    That was three years.

    Goodluck Jonathan, a southern man, Christian ruled after him between May 2010 and May 2015.

    He served for five years.

    Muhammadu Buhari came back as a civilian president and he served for eight years from 2015 to 2023.

    On May 29, 2023, Bola Ahmed Tinubu became president. He is the first southern Muslim to lead the country after Abiola’s election was annuled.

    Tinubu has been in charge for two years seven months.

    Now, since we started self governance in 1957, northerners have ruled for 49 years and only one of them was a Christian (this became imperative as your writer did not only try to use ethnicity but religion as well).

    It therefore means that while northerners have ruled for 49 years, southerners have ruled for 19 years as follows: Aguiyi Ironsi – 6 months; Olusegun Obasanjo – 3 years as military leader and 8 years as civilian president; Ernest Shonekan – 3 months; Jonathan – 5 years and Tinubu 2 years and 7 months (still in office).

    Mallam, how do you then hold a two year old government responsible for the high level of poverty, illiteracy, economic retardation and insecurity in the north simply because the leader of that government is not another northern Muslim?

    Your writer even blamed Tinubu for infrastructural decay in the north as if the south is better.

    He cunningly quoted the Lagos -Calabar coastal highway but neglected the ongoing Sokoto-Badagry highway.

    He said that Tinubu has stopped trade between the north and Niger Republic while business thrive in the south but on March 14, 2024, the Tinubu government opened land and air borders with Niger Republic and lifted other sanctions against that country’s military junta.
    ( https://statehouse.gov.ng/nigeria-opens-land-and-air-borders-with-republic-of-niger-lift-other-sanctions/ )

    Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, it is also not true that this administration is witch hunting northern Muslims, the administration is after thieves no matter their religion and ethnicity.

    Emefiele has forfeited some of the properties he acquired through corruption and he is neither a northerner nor a Muslim. How you and your writer forgot that is a mystery.

    Fayose is not in custody but is Yahaya Bello in custody or is Kogi no longer a northern state and Yahaya Bello no longer a Muslim?

    Is Tambuwal still in custody?

    Or is he a southerner and a bishop too?

    Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, those appointed to offices you and the writer think that should be reserved for northern Muslims are Nigerians too.

    Let us therefore not cause unnecessary tension among the people because of politics and the struggle to get back to public office at whatever cost.

    God bless you.
    God bless the President.
    God bless the good people of Nigeria.
    God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    Adeniran wrioes from Jabi, Abuja

  • El-Rufai’s narrative of frustration and falsehood

    El-Rufai’s narrative of frustration and falsehood

    Sir: The recent television appearance by the former governor of Kaduna State, Malam Nasir El-Rufai, was a pitiable spectacle of a man grappling with the crushing weight of political irrelevance. His interview, laden with recycled and baseless allegations, was not an exposition of truth but a desperate cry for attention from a figure who has been rightly consigned to the side-lines of Kaduna’s and indeed Nigeria’s political arena.

    The core of his latest grievance, a tired rehash of the false claim that Governor Uba Sani endorsed a N1 billion compensation payment to bandits, is as ludicrous as it is defamatory. He made these same allegation months ago, and like a poorly constructed house, it collapsed under the slightest scrutiny, failing to hold any water. That he would regurgitate this same debunked falsehood indicates not a commitment to truth, but a poverty of new ideas and a malicious intent to deceive the public.

    What is most reprehensible is the timing of his vitriol. At a time when patriots across the nation are mourning the resurgence of killings and the heart-breaking abduction of schoolgirls in some states; crimes orchestrated by the dark forces of evil, El-Rufai has chosen to use this national tragedy as a cheap opportunity to score political points. Instead of joining in solidarity and offering constructive solutions, he dons the cloak of a critic, seeking to portray the incumbent government in a black paint of failure.

    The audacity of El-Rufai to speak on compensation for armed groups is particularly galling. As if he has suddenly developed amnesia, he conveniently forgets that it was his own administration that initiated and implemented a policy of compensating armed groups in Southern Kaduna. This is a matter of public record. For him to now turn around and accuse another of a similar, albeit fictional, action is a classic case of a pot calling the kettle black, a stunning display of sheer impunity and a lack of self-awareness.

    The Kaduna state government must not treat these inflammatory statements with nonchalance. El-Rufai’s words are not mere political banter; they are careless sparks thrown into a powder keg of ethnic and religious tensions in Kaduna. Such rhetoric is capable of stirring up serious conflict, misleading the populace, and undermining the genuine efforts of the current administration to foster peace and reconciliation.

    Read Also: AU-EU Summit: Nigeria insists Africa must lead its security solutions, rejects private military firms

    It is imperative that El-Rufai is forced to present evidence for his grave allegations. The burden of proof lies squarely on the accuser. If he possesses any iota of evidence, any document, or any credible witness to substantiate his claim of a N1 billion compensation, let him present it publicly. If he cannot, and he most certainly cannot, then he must be held accountable for peddling falsehoods.

    Governor Uba Sani’s approach to security has been markedly different and more pragmatic than the chaotic and often contradictory strategies of the past administration. He has focused on strengthening the state’s security architecture, fostering community led intelligence gathering, and pursuing a holistic solution that addresses the root causes of banditry and criminality, rather than the knee-jerk and unsustainable policies of his predecessor.

    Unlike El-Rufai, who often ruled with an iron fist and a divisive tongue, Governor Sani has embraced a leadership style that is inclusive, consultative, and focused on healing the deep wounds inflicted on the state’s social fabric. He is building bridges where the previous administration built walls of distrust and alienation.

    It is time for Nasir El-Rufai to accept his retirement gracefully and allow the present administration the peace and space to continue its work of rebuilding Kaduna State. His continued vitriol serves no one but himself and the agents of discord he seems so eager to empower. Kaduna has moved on, and it is a pity he has not.

    •Jabir T Usman,Tudun Wada, Kaduna.

  • Kaduna govt denies El-Rufai’s claim of ₦1bn payment to bandits

    Kaduna govt denies El-Rufai’s claim of ₦1bn payment to bandits

    • …demands evidence or public apology, threatens legal action

    The Kaduna State Government has dismissed as false and politically driven the claim by former Governor Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai that the administration of Governor Uba Sani paid ₦1 billion to bandits.

    El-Rufai made the allegation during a Channels Television interview, but the government described it as baseless and intended to undermine the state’s ongoing security progress.

    In a statement issued on Sunday, the Commissioner for Internal Security and Home Affairs, Hon. (Dr.) Sule Shu’aibu, SAN, said the claim was “a fabrication devoid of context, substance, or credibility,” accusing the former governor of attempting to mislead the public.

    The government criticised El-Rufai for “recklessly weaponising sensitive security matters for political grandstanding,” saying such conduct is unbecoming of a former leader.

    Shu’aibu stressed that Governor Uba Sani has never authorised, negotiated, or paid ransom to any criminal group.

    “Not one naira. Not one kobo,” he stated, noting that the Governor has repeatedly clarified this in media engagements and stakeholder meetings.

    The statement referenced the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), which had previously dismissed similar claims by El-Rufai as unfounded and inconsistent with national security protocols. ONSA has maintained that neither the Federal Government nor state governments pay ransom to criminal elements.

    Outlining its security strategy, the government said it is pursuing a community-focused model anchored on enhanced military operations, collaboration with legitimate community leaders, and improved access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities.

    Read Also: Capital market turnover hits N10tr

    “The State engages communities, not bandits,” the statement emphasised.

    Grassroots organisations, including the Birnin-Gwari Vanguard for Security and Good Governance, also rejected El-Rufai’s claim, describing it as misleading and untrue. The group faced some of the state’s toughest security challenges during his tenure.

    The government further pointed to past allegations raised by senior members of El-Rufai’s own administration suggesting he used public funds to appease certain groups, calling his current accusations “deeply paradoxical.”

    Since assuming office, Governor Sani has focused on stabilising affected communities, reopening schools, markets, and farmlands, and rebuilding trust across ethnic and religious divides.

    The statement challenged El-Rufai to present credible evidence—such as bank records, memos, or security correspondence—if he has any. It added that a similar allegation he made in September 2025 “collapsed under scrutiny” after no proof was provided.

    The government demanded that El-Rufai withdraw the claim and issue an unreserved public apology within one week, warning that failure to do so may compel the State to pursue legal action “to safeguard public order and institutional integrity.”

    Reaffirming its commitment to transparency and responsible security management, the Kaduna State Government said it will not be distracted by “politics of bitterness, fearmongering, or orchestrated falsehoods.”

  • El-Rufai: Time for North to fully adopt digital technology, innovation

    El-Rufai: Time for North to fully adopt digital technology, innovation

    Former Kaduna Governor Malam Nasir El Rufai at the weekend said the time has come for the Northern region to embrace digital technology and promote its inclusion in all endeavours.

    El Rufai made the call at Ceedi Plaza Cinema, Abuja during the presentation of the Fasahar Zamani Digital Technology Movie Premiere produced by Blue Sapphire Hub, and funded by the United Kingdom Development International 

    The movie is a series of 12 episodes produced in Hausa, but subtitled in English to bridge the digital gap in northern Nigeria. 

    The event was attended a cross section of dignitaries in the North. 

    El-Rufai, a former Minister of the FCT under President Olusegun Obasanjo, expressed concerns over slow pace of adoption of digital technologies in the north, regretting that the region is backward when it comes to the use and deployment of digital technology. 

    He said northern Governors should consider it a duty to invest in digital technology, train digital entrepreneurs and support them with seed funding to ensure sustainability of their businesses. 

    El Rufai said: “Northern Nigeria is yet to come to terms with the reality of the tech age, and we need to have a soft way of introducing this and making it attractive and exciting for our young people. 

    “This production of 12 episodes of this messaging will go a long way in attracting the attention of our young people, as well as their parents, to the importance of adopting technology, digital technology in particular, as we move into the age of AI.

    “The way forward now is for the state governments in northern Nigeria to take this messaging to the next level. On our own part, I have been partnering with state governments to host Arewa TechFest.

    “And I will call on all the northern states governors to use this opportunity to take it a step further by identifying digital and tech entrepreneurs in their states and supporting them with seed money so that they can develop their ideas, create jobs, and put Nigeria on the technology map.”

    El-Rufai also said digital technology can be used for Nigeria future elections, saying that he deployed it in Kaduna for local government elections. He said the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) could leverage digital technology for the 2027 elections.

    Speaking at the film presentation, the Country Lead and Programme Advisor for the U.K. Government’s Global Digital Access Programme, Idongesit Udoh, noted that the project was among others being supported by his organisation to bridge digital gap. Ensuring safe access is also part of this effort, and encouraging the use of a secure PC VPN can help people confidently participate in digital services.

    “This is a piece of project that the U.K. government has supported to bring on board people who are excluded from the growing digital economy in Nigeria. 

    “As you may know, Nigeria’s digital economy is blossoming. It’s the fastest growing sector of the country’s economy and contributes hugely to the GDP.

    “But also there is the fact that there are people who are not included in this sector. So the advanced digital adoption in Nigeria was a piece of project specifically designed to bring on board women, people with disabilities, and people from communities that are completely unserved or underserved, “Udoh said. 

  • El-Rufai’s SDP-ADC merger plan hits rock as Kaduna SDP women leader Sani quits party 

    El-Rufai’s SDP-ADC merger plan hits rock as Kaduna SDP women leader Sani quits party 

    Kaduna’s political scene has been shaken by the resignation of Hajia Zainab Sani, the Women Leader of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the state, in what analysts describe as a major setback to the planned SDP–ADC merger reportedly being championed by former Governor Nasir El-Rufai.

    Zainab, a powerful grassroots mobilizer from Giwa Local Government Area, has long been regarded as one of Kaduna’s most influential female politicians. 

    As a former member of the All Progressives Congress (APC), she played a key role in women mobilization during several of the party’s electoral victories before joining the SDP, where she became one of El-Rufai’s trusted political associates.

    Announcing her resignation, Zainab said she could no longer remain in a party that, in her words, “has lost touch with the people” and is “driven more by elite political interests than by the realities of the masses.”

    “The SDP has failed to demonstrate a people-first agenda,” she declared. “Our people are still grappling with poverty, insecurity, and hunger. Many in Kaduna have not forgotten the anti-people policies of the last administration, and I will not be part of any arrangement that seeks to repackage that legacy under a different banner.”

    Her remarks, observers say, were a clear swipe at El-Rufai’s administration, whose policies, including mass demolitions, mass sackings, and strained relations with labour and community groups, remain deeply controversial.

    Read Also: SDP not working for APC – Adebayo

    Zainab’s exit comes at a time Governor Uba Sani is consolidating his image as a people-oriented leader through pro-poor policies, empowerment programmes, and rural development initiatives that have earned him wide grassroots support.

    Analysts believe her resignation could reshape the emerging political alliances in Kaduna, particularly as the SDP struggles to maintain relevance amid talks of a merger with the African Democratic Congress (ADC) to form a third force ahead of the 2027 elections.

    “Zainab’s departure is not just symbolic, it’s strategic She commands enormous influence among women and youths across rural Kaduna. Losing her now is a major blow to the El-Rufai camp and raises questions about the credibility of the proposed SDP–ADC coalition” a political commentator noted. 

    While Zainab has yet to announce her next political move, insider sources told our correspondent that, she has concluded arrangements to return to the APC with over 5,000 women leaders drawn from the northern and central parts of the state.

    Her defection, if confirmed, would significantly boost Governor Uba Sani’s governance drive and reinforce his growing hold on grassroots politics across Kaduna.

    Observers say her decision reflects a broader shift in Kaduna’s political alignment, from elite-driven scheming to issue-based and people-centred engagement.

    For many, it also signals waning enthusiasm for El-Rufai’s new political experiment, even among his long-time loyalists.

    As one local analyst put it, “Zainab Sani’s resignation may be the first crack in El-Rufai’s merger wall, and perhaps the clearest sign yet that Kaduna’s grassroots politics is gravitating toward empathy, inclusion, and real impact.”

  • El-Rufai on Tinubu’s life presidency

    El-Rufai on Tinubu’s life presidency

    Exasperated by the noticeable improvements in the economy, and unable to cite hardship as justification for his acidic political campaign against the Bola Tinubu-led All Progressives Congress (APC) administration, former Kaduna State governor and chieftain of the political coalition assembled to take the presidency in 2027, Nasir el-Rufai, has changed tack. Instead of whining on behalf of the poor and hungry and angry, as he was wont many months ago, he has now begun to seize upon extraneous reasons to pillory the administration. If he is not drawing attention to what he described as the dictatorial tendency of President Tinubu, he is griping about his unsubstantiated fear that the president might want to be a life president should he win a second term.

    Read Also: Tinubu: Northern group slams El-Rufai over tenure extension claim

    The former governor made the wild life presidency claim when former vice president Atiku Abubakar paid him a visit at his Abuja home last week. First he flattered his visitor by falsely describing him as a fighter who took on the military, and then went on to serenade him as a man of experience in democratic governance. In addition, he arrogantly suggested that Nigerians had made up their minds to unseat the APC in favour of the coalition, and without addressing the inconvenient fact of how the former vice president split the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and stood unmovable on that division, he also described Alhaji Atiku as a man of forbearance and diplomatic skills in bringing people together. Like everything about Mallam el-Rufai’s hyperbole, his insinuations about President Tinubu’s life presidency ambition remain unsubstantiated. But does he care?  

  • Tinubu: Northern group slams El-Rufai over tenure extension claim

    Tinubu: Northern group slams El-Rufai over tenure extension claim

    The Northern Nigeria Minorities Group (NNMG) has condemned former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, over his claim that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu intends to extend his tenure beyond the constitutionally allowed eight years.

    In a statement issued in Abuja by its convener, Chief Jacob Edi, the group described El-Rufai’s allegation as reckless, malicious, and an affront to democracy, insisting that the former governor was speaking out of bitterness and frustration.

    The NNMG argued that El-Rufai’s political outbursts were fuelled by his exclusion from President Tinubu’s cabinet, noting that his comments amounted to “sour grapes from a man who feels sidelined and irrelevant.”

    The statement accused El-Rufai of a “pattern of treachery,” alleging that he had a history of betrayal and political scheming aimed at destabilizing the polity whenever his ambitions were not met.

    Reaffirming that the 1999 Constitution clearly limits presidential tenure to two terms of four years each, the group said no amount of propaganda could alter that reality.

    Read Also: Northern group slams El-Rufai over comments on insecurity

    “At a time when Nigeria needs unity and focus, El-Rufai has once again positioned himself as a destabilizing agent,” the NNMG said.

    The group called on the former governor to retract his remarks and apologize to Nigerians, urging citizens to dismiss his allegations as the wailings of a rejected politician.

    It further asked security agencies to place El-Rufai and others making similar comments under watch, warning that such statements could create unnecessary tension.

    “The minorities of Northern Nigeria will resist any attempt, whether by tenure elongation or by bitter politicians sowing confusion, to derail our democracy,” the statement added.

  • Presidency dismisses El-Rufai’s ‘life president’ claim as baseless

    Presidency dismisses El-Rufai’s ‘life president’ claim as baseless

    The Presidency has dismissed as “baseless and absurd” the claim by former Kaduna State Governor Nasir el-Rufai that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu plans to become a life president.  

    In a post on his verified X handle, @aonanuga1955, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, said the allegation was nothing more than panic propaganda.

    Onanuga described Tinubu as an avowed democrat with no intention of exceeding the constitutional two-term limit.

    “President Tinubu is a democrat who does not intend to stay in office beyond May 28, 2031, when re-elected in 2027,” Onanuga wrote, describing El-Rufai’s alarm as unfounded and a product of political hallucination,’’ he wrote on the handle on Sunday night.

    The presidential spokesman said El-Rufai’s outburst reflected frustration over the strength of Tinubu’s support in the North, especially after the President’s grand reception during his recent visit to Kaduna.

    He argued that the former governor’s narrative of northern disaffection with Tinubu had collapsed under the weight of reality.

    READ ALSO: How to curb Corruption in Nigeria

    “After reports of the grand reception President Tinubu received in Kaduna last Friday, El-Rufai was clearly surprised by the depth of support the President continues to enjoy in the North. This stands in stark contrast to his narrative that the region has abandoned the President,” Onanuga stated.

    He added that the claim of “life presidency”  was nothing more than a desperate attempt to distract from the futility of efforts by the former governor and his new political associates to derail Tinubu’s anticipated re-election in 2027.

    Onanuga further suggested that Kaduna State Governor, Uba Sani, should intervene to rescue his predecessor.

    “Governor Uba Sani may wish to reach out to his predecessor, as El-Rufai could benefit from some professional counselling to steer him away from his recent hallucinations and political fabrications on Tinubu and 2027,” he noted.

    Onanuga maintained that President Tinubu was committed to democratic principles and to leaving office at the end of his constitutional mandate.

  • Presidency dismisses El-Rufai’s ‘life President’ claim

    Presidency dismisses El-Rufai’s ‘life President’ claim

    The Presidency has dismissed as “baseless and absurd” claims by former Kaduna Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu harbours plans to become a life president after his tenure.

    In a post on his verified X handle, @aonanuga1955, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, said the allegation was nothing more than panic propaganda, stressing that Tinubu remains an avowed democrat with no intention of exceeding the constitutional two-term limit.

    “President Tinubu is a democrat who does not intend to stay in office beyond May 28, 2031, when re-elected in 2027,” Onanuga wrote, describing El-Rufai’s alarm as unfounded and a product of political hallucination.

    The presidential spokesman said El-Rufai’s outburst reflected frustration over the strength of Tinubu’s support in the North, especially after the President’s grand reception during his recent visit to Kaduna. 

    He argued that the former governor’s narrative of northern disaffection with Tinubu had collapsed under the weight of reality.

    Read Also: Northern group slams El-Rufai over comments on insecurity

    “After reports of the grand reception President Tinubu received in Kaduna last Friday, El-Rufai was clearly surprised by the depth of support the President continues to enjoy in the North. This stands in stark contrast to his narrative that the region has abandoned the President,” Onanuga stated.

    He added that El-Rufai’s claims of a “life presidency” plot were nothing more than a desperate attempt to distract from the futility of efforts by the former governor and his new political associates to derail Tinubu’s anticipated re-election in 2027.

    Onanuga further suggested that Kaduna Governor, Uba Sani, should intervene with his predecessor. 

    “Governor Uba Sani may wish to reach out to his predecessor, as El-Rufai could benefit from some professional counselling to steer him away from his recent hallucinations and political fabrications on Tinubu and 2027,” he noted.

    The Presidency maintained that President Tinubu is committed to democratic principles and to leaving office at the end of his constitutional mandate.