Tag: elders

  • Yoruba elders and herdsmen

    For sometime now, there has been speculations and reports that following the abduction or kidnapping of Chief Olu Falae, an elder statesman, some Yoruba leaders were contemplating and agitating over what action to take against the Fulani herdsmen in, not only, Ondo State, where the old man was kidnapped but the entire South-west.

    The alleged kidnapping of the former Secretary to the Federal Government and one-time Minister of Finance, by the herdsmen in the first place did surprise not a few Nigerians, in view of the fact that no arrest and interrogation of any herdsman or men were made by anybody, including the Nigeria Police and other security agencies in the country.

    So, a lot of reasonable people did not take this matter of the allegation that the Yoruba ethnic nationality was taking or preparing to take any umbrella decision to expel any herdsmen from any part of Nigeria seriously.  The allegation sounded like a movie.  The best way to handle such long tale was to ignore it in the interest of your time and sanity.

    Otherwise, how could any Nigerian contemplate the expulsion from another part of Nigeria of any Nigerian to another part of it?  What could be the constitutional and national consequence of such an action within the country as a body corporate?  For the sake of argument let’s assume that the wild allegation was true – that it was the herdsmen, six of them that kidnapped the chief. Would the action of these six demented criminals justify the blanket action on the entire herdsmen in the South-west?

    Every tribe, ethnic group has her own share of the good, the bad and the ugly.  And that is why there has never been and there will never be any law that will be enacted to force people as a whole to carry any vicarious liability on behalf of others. People will continue to bear liability for their own actions only – either positive or negative.  This is the standard of any civilized society. People must be assumed to be innocent until proven otherwise.

    One question that has been agitating my mind and I believe most Nigerians is – how did Chief Olu Falae come to the conclusion that it was Fulani herdsmen who kidnapped him?  What incontrovertible evidence did he have or put forward to Nigerians that it was truly the herdsmen that kidnapped him?  To say they dressed like herdsmen or spoke Fulfulde (the Fulani language) or they looked like Fulani was not and shall never be tenable for various reasons.

    Since when did it become a law that only Fulani should speak Fulfulde, dress in any particular clothes or manner?  Under what law did the Fulani get any different colour identity or any other identity that is legally and lawfully exclusive to them as a mark of a tribal identity?

    It is one of the commonest things to find better Fulfulde speakers among the Fulani who are not Fulani.  There are still those who look like the Fulani in all their physical features but are not Fulani. There are also those who dress like the Fulani but are not Fulani especially during cultural festivals.  There are also other tribes that dress like the Yoruba, speak Yoruba fluently, yet they are not Yoruba.  We also have other tribes such as the Berom, Tarok, Shuwa, Mandingo, Tuaregs both local and international who are herdsmen but they are not Fulani.

    Are the Yoruba elders telling us today that the Fulani or their herdsmen who have lived for hundreds of years in Yoruba land who speak the Yoruba language and have become almost entirely absorbed in the Yoruba culture of dress, dance and other Yoruba activities should today go out and commit any criminal activity and the Yoruba as an ethnic group be forced to take a mortal liability for it as a people?  The dress, the language, even the marks (meant to identify different tribes) have failed as the marks of most tribes look alike. As for physical attributes you need to ask people sometimes before you know where they come from or who they are tribally or even ethnically.

    Do we need to remind these respected, educated, enlightened, cosmopolitan and urbane Yoruba elders that the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria clearly spelt out under Section 41(1) thus: “Every citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout (my emphasis) Nigeria and to reside in any part thereof, and no citizen of Nigeria shall be expelled from Nigeria or refused entry thereto or exit therefrom”.

    As Nigerians, we must try as hard as possible, no matter, our ethnic, tribal or other differences to respect the laws of the land and refrain from doing anything that can cause ill-feeling, disunity, ethnic or religious crises where it is absolutely dangerous to do so like it is in this case.  There is nowhere that the herdsmen in the South-west in general or Ondo State in particular held any tribal, ethnic or any corporate group meeting where a decision was taken to kidnap Chief Olu Falae or any Yoruba man or woman for that matter.

    It is also true that so far there is no identity parade or security report that identified and verified that it was the herdsmen of the village farm of Olu Falae that kidnapped him.  Even if there were such facts, they would still be subjected to the rigours of our law courts to establish the level of the culpability of such herdsmen, their sponsors, if any, and their motive for such criminal act.

    Even with that, there would not be any vicarious criminal liability on anybody, including the blood relations of such criminals.  It is a very dangerous thing to lump an entire ethnic group together and accuse them of committing a crime that only six crazy and deranged criminals committed. They should be found and fried for their criminal action.

     

    • Bayari, a former national officer of the Myetti Allah Association, sent in this piece from Jos.
  • Bayelsa PDP elders meet Dickson over defection

    Bayelsa PDP elders meet Dickson over defection

    Bayelsa State elders and members of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have met with Governor Seriake Dickson, following the mass exodus of the party members to the All Progressives Congress (APC) ahead of the December 5 governorship election.

    A statement yesterday by Dickson’s Chief Press Secretary (CPS), Mr. Daniel Iworsio-Markson, said the elders met under the aegis of Bayelsa Elders Consultative Council (BECC). They were said those who defected from the PDP to the APC “are a disgrace to the Ijaw nation”.

    The elders unanimously passed a vote of confidence in the governor, urging him to re-contest.

    They berated the defectors, saying they are “fair weather politicians with a savage mentality”.

    Dignitaries at the meeting included the Chairman of the State Traditional Rulers Council, King Alfred Diete-Spiff; former Military Governor of old Bendel State, General John Yeri, (retd.); Chairman of the Bayelsa State Founding Fathers’ Forum, Dr. Amba Ambaiowei and Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Prof Edmond Allison-Oguru.

    The statement said Dickson decried the spate of defection, adding that the defectors are ingrates, who do not mean well for the state.

    The governor noted that most of the defectors were major beneficiaries of Dr. Goodluck Jonathan’s magnanimity, who abandoned him as soon as he lost the March 28 presidential election.

    He said such persons should have reciprocated the former President’s goodwill by remaining in the party instead of outright turning their backs against him.

    Dickson said: “These persons are clearly not for us; they are enemies of the Ijaw nation. It is sad that people who have benefited immensely from the PDP and Dr. Jonathan could, within so short a time, jump ship. Yet, they come and deceive us that they love us. These are not persons to be taken serious. We must not fall prey to their antics.”

    The governor urged security agencies to increase their efforts at ridding the state of criminality, despite the prevailing peace.

    He noted that the recent upsurge in kidnapping, piracy, killings and other criminal activities, might have political undertones, among other factors. Dickson decried the attacks on his administration.

    The governor said despite the distractions, the state government had continued to promote the freedom of speech and expression.

    On the state’s financial situation, Dickson said although there had been a shortfall in the revenue accruing to the state from the federal allocation, the government remained committed to paying workers’ salaries and pensioners’ entitlements.

    He said: “My government has completed big projects, such as the Toru-Ebeni Bridge, Ogbia/Nembe Road, the road to Boro town and the building of several secondary and primary schools at about N23 billion.

    The governor assured that the development of Bayelsa State would always be given priority.

    He called for the support, encouragement and prayers of well-meaning residents.

    Dickson said: “While I ask for your support, encouragement and prayers to make Bayelsa a better place for all, we need to tap your wealth of experience and wisdom as the government builds institutions to move the state to greater to heights.”

    The forum’s Chairman Francis Doukpola said the interaction would foster a better understanding and cooperation among stakeholders.

    He urged traditional rulers to take security issues seriously by monitoring the activities of their subjects.

    Doukpola hailed the governor for his pragmatic leadership style and commitment to the development of the state.

    He said such achievements were unprecedented in the history of the state.

     

  • Leadership tussle: CCC elders, Shepherds rally support for Olatoso

    Leadership tussle: CCC elders, Shepherds rally support for Olatoso

    Elders of the Celestial Church of Christ (CCC) have rallied  round their “unification”leader, Rev Olatoso Matthew Oshoffa, asking members to support him.

    They said Olatoso was “divinely ordained.”

    In a statement yesterday, Senior Evangelist Adeola Emmanuel and Senior Evangelist Johnson Olakunle, said the church could not move forward without a divinely anointed leader who will take it to another height.

    The statement reads: “Following the unfortunate judgment of the Ilaro High Court which terminated the leadership of our former Pastor, Reverend Emmanuel Oshoffa, our great church had been without headship and this is not healthy for the church.

    “Now that the Lord in His goodness has chosen a new leader for His church in the person of Reverend Olatoso Matthew Oshoffa, we should bury our differences and embrace him for the benefit of all.”

    The elders said God’s will must be done for the church to move forward, noting that in the last 12 years, it has not made progress.

    Rev Oshoffa has promised to, among others, build a cathedral at the church’s Imeko, Ogun State headquarter; saying the project will be completed in five years.

  • Dickson to Bayelsa elders: you are greedy, hypocritical

    Dickson to Bayelsa elders: you are greedy, hypocritical

    Bayelsa State Governor Seriake Dickson has said some elders who plan to join the All Progressives Congress (APC) are greedy and hypocritical politicians.

    The elders, under the aegis of Bayelsa Peoples Consultative Assembly (BPCA), accused Dickson of highhandedness in running the state.

    But in a statement in Yenagoa, the state capital, by his Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Daniel Iworiso-Markson, the governor said the accusations were misplaced.

    He said they were disguised reasons to justify the elders’ motives which, he said, were motivated by greed.

    The statement said: “Obviously, this is an opportunistic lobby group desperately in search of power without any modicum of integrity. They should be reminded that contrary to their assertions, they actually constitute the problem of development in the state and not Governor Dickson.

    “What is playing out is an offshoot of the governor’s long running battle with this class of politicians on the proper utilisation of state resources to serve the people and never to serve the greed of the few.

    “Their selfish conception of politics and attitude in government are what has retarded development in the state since the era of the late statesman, Chief Melford Okilo.

    “Bayelsans can never exchange the present peace and tranquility in the state as well as the unprecedented level of development for the chaos and unmitigated rent culture of the past.”

  • Elders: 2015 polls worst in Rivers history

    The leaders and elders of Rivers State, under the aegis of the Founding Fathers Foundation of Rivers State, have described this year’s general elections as the worst in the history of the state.

    The group, also known as the Rivers Elders and Leaders Council (RELEC), at its meeting yesterday in Port Harcourt, the state capital, noted that politically-motivated violence, which led to the death of many innocent persons and destruction of property worth billions of naira, was not the character of true Rivers indigenes.

    Through its Chairman, Chief Albert Horsfall, a former Director-General of the State Security Service (SSS), RELEC congratulated President-elect Muhammadu Buhari on his victory in the March 28 election.

    But it declined to do same for the “winner” of Rivers governorship poll, Chief Nyesom Wike, apparently because of the cases at the election petitions tribunal, sitting in Abuja.

    The state governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr. Dakuku Adol Peterside, and the standard bearers of some the other political parties, who have filed their petitions at the tribunal, have insisted that the “sham” April 11 poll was massively rigged in favour of Wike of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Horsfall said: “We abhor and condemn every act of violence, including what some people will call mischief. It is not the culture of Rivers State. We want to remind all and sundry that the cradle of Nigerian civilisation is from here. Civilisation entered Nigeria through our shores and it is truly shameful that violence during the last elections was uppermost in this (Rivers) state and those who promoted it and acted it have dragged us to the barbaric stage of life and we reject it and we ask all those who are involved either in promoting the same or projecting it to drop their guns now.

    “This state does not need violence. We need peace, tranquility and security to prevail herein, so that Rivers people and those who are non-Rivers people, who come here for one business or another, will enjoy a peaceable state here and so their businesses.”

    On its demands from the President-elect, who they hinted they would soon, RELEC said they would inform him that the people of the state had always been good Nigerians, adding that they would support his government and work hard to promote peace and tranquility in Rivers.

    He added: “We are good Nigerians and we intend to remain good Nigerians.”

    It urged the people to shun violent politicians, who they said do not mean well for them.

    So, all the violence that has been projected by immature politicians and misguided youths, we expect them to stop and we invite the President-elect to do his utmost to support us in bringing down the element of violent politicking in this state, as one gift he can give to Rivers State, on his assumption of office.”

    RELEC admonished the residents to continue to embrace peace and remain law-abiding.

     

  • Between authentic Yoruba demands and what these elders are hawking around

    Between authentic Yoruba demands and what these elders are hawking around

    How can these elders expect Yorubas to vote a man who treated them with unequalled disdain for all of his six years in office?

    The name PDP Afenifere cropped up some two years ago when the Yoruba nation began to see the likes of  Iyiola Omisore, the forever wannabe-be governor  of Osun State –  attending  Afenifere meetings. But it has since got worse, with even  Igbos now routinely attending, probably  bearing President Jonathan’s  election-related  gifts  or there to  attest  to  the  loyalty of  our elders to their new leader.  It doesn’t get more horrible for a proud Yoruba people.  And, for a certainty, the Ikemba  must be smiling in his grave; he who had wanted, but failed,  to make Col Banjo an Igbo viceroy in Yoruba land  when, during the Biafran war, he armed him to go conquer Lagos, now seeing  his Igbo brothers, Peter Obi and Udenta, resplendently seated, like conquistadors, at a once  revered Yoruba conclave. A single one of our Yoruba elders is yet to attend an Ohaneze meeting.

    Could these elders have forgotten the Ore war?

    A defining election is here with us, one in which the Yoruba nation must not permit itself to be obfuscated, especially by self-lovers who should ordinarily be our guarding lights. Unfortunately, a Pauline conversion, on an industrial scale, has since happened, and today, those who used to lead us are themselves now being led by a ‘youth’. Yet, however odious the situation, we still must be careful how we approach this delicate matter that fouls the mouth, but instantly adds salt; lest we be confused with that insufferable  PDP Goebbels, who  manufactures a lie, a day.

    I am a student of  history and learnt at the feet of the very best –  Akinjogbin, Fajana, Anjorin, Afolayan, Igbafe, Omosini, not to mention the incredible duo of  Segun Osoba and Banji  Akintoye, about  both of  whom I have written copiously on this column, these past ten years, beginning with the rested Comet. That was at the Great University of Ife, close on fifty years ago, and it is on that legacy I will leverage to shred this unprecedented attempt by so tiny a few – you can now count them on your finger tips – to mislead the entire Yoruba nation; a people with a history dating back thousands of years and a people you would never describe as foolish. Worse is it, that this is in a subterfuge aimed at corralling them to queue behind, unarguably, the most corrupt government in Nigerian history. After all, the essence of history is using the past to illuminate the present, and the future, so that mistakes are rendered negligible. How can these elders expect Yorubas to vote a man who treated them with unequalled disdain for all of his six years in office?

    And how do I do this in a manner that will so resoundingly blow off the shibboleths they are ceaselessly hawking about, running from Akure to Ibadan, and herding thousands of our youth to Akure for no other reason than to socialise bribery, in the forlorn hope that these young people Jonathan’s government could not give jobs, will now give him victory in Yoruba land.  All I have to do is present to the sons and daughters of  Oduduwa, their long standing  demands  for proper restructuring as contained in the YORUBA AGENDA  which I urge them  to  compare with the dead on arrival recommendations of the Jonathan Confab they now equate to a silver bullet for the myriad problems currently hobbling Nigeria. This will convince our people that these elders’ merchandise is nothing but a pig in a poke. Happily, we are too smart to be sold on the cheap, especially since we are well aware that, deep down, all this showboating is targeted at oil pipeline contracts and political rehab.

    The Yoruba Agenda, 2005, represents the culmination of efforts and ideas which have been canvassed in Yoruba land since the agitation for a return to true federalism energised those seeking a solution to the perennial crisis of governance in Nigeria. After its adoption at a Yoruba Assembly, it was submitted to a meeting of the Southwest Governor’s Technical Committee and it formed the kernel of the report submitted to the 2006 National Conference which was aborted. Unlike any other document, it enjoys the singular attribute of having every stratum of the Yoruba nation making a contribution.

    It contains some specific, and, immutable demands which you would think these elders ensured were incorporated in the recommendations, but for where? Among these are the following: a self-governing and autonomous region to mobilise the energy of the Yoruba for progress and development and to ignite their collective resolve for cultural renaissance, educational resurgence and social stability; a right for the Yoruba to live under a regional government within the Nigerian Federation with its own constitution and which will be the master of its own internal affairs.  One which will function as one out of six regional governments  which  will form the federating units in a federation operating federal and regional constitutions.

    Naturally, the new federation will undergo structural changes which will touch on, among others, the scope and limits of the powers of the federating units; the form of government, revenue allocation and fiscal federalism which will ensure that each region can develop at its own pace; resource control, police and policing and a judiciary which will have a federal Supreme Court for strictly constitutional cases and at the regional level, the apex court will be the court of Appeal. Indeed, under these Yoruba demands, membership of the National Judicial Council shall be so representative that excessive power would no longer be concentrated in the hands of the Chief Justice of the Federation. The present archaic, unproductive, centralised, single and unified police system would be jettisoned for a system of federal and regional police.

    The above are only some of the original Yoruba demands as contained in the Yoruba Agenda. Were PDP Afenifere to have based its endorsement of President Jonathan on their inclusion, or even only a majority of them, I could very well have elected to be their orchestra’s drummer boy.

    But what is the testimony of Mr Femi Falana, SAN, who, like them, was a conference delegate but one you would never find running between Akure, Owerri, Delta, Ibadan or Abuja?  In an interview he granted The Nation newspaper and published on Thursday, 5 March 5, 2015, Falana said as follows in answer to the question: Can you be more specific  on the Yoruba Agenda at the national conference?: ”Frankly speaking, answered him, the Yoruba agenda was anchored on regional autonomy, restructuring, parliamentary system or Westminster model, fiscal federalism or resource control, unicameral legislature, a ceremonial president and a prime minister with full executive powers, a special status for Lagos State, state police and deletion of the Land Use Act from the Constitution. Those were the items which constituted the core Yoruba Agenda. The items were defeated in to-to at the confab. Of course, the establishment of State Police scaled through on the basis of the role of the civilian joint task force in the fight against insurgency in the Northeast region. I challenge the authors of the Yoruba Agenda to point to other items that were adopted by the Confab.  Indeed, the approval of State Police, we learnt, was not based on the initiators’ advocacy.  Falana went further to explain that the Confab made three types of recommendations on policy direction, statutory amendments and constitutional review which require the promulgation of over 50 new laws and amendment of about 80 existing legislations and that although some of the bills were prepared and submitted to the government, the President did absolutely nothing in the past six months except set up the Adoke committee to study the report. Or could our elders have forgotten that the legislature has a role to play in its implementation in which case they must have to endorse all the federal legislators too?”

    Given the above, one can only conclude, like this column did last week, that this is all a  poorly calibrated ploy to mask their support for a government which Chief Obafemi Awolowo, by whose name they swear, would never have touched with the longest pole.

    I wish, therefore, to plead  with my Yoruba compatriots that while we continue to accord these elders all the respect they so richly deserve, a single one of us must not make the mistake of voting  a man who has so ill-served the Yoruba race and Nigeria.

  • Elders for sale

    Hardball demurred. The original, or if you like, the instinctive title of this piece was “Agbata ekee elders on the prowl”. But one thought it would be too restrictive. It was changed to “Elders on the prowl”, but that seemed too tepid and too susceptible to being overlooked as it did not quite carry the message. Well, the survivor, “Elders for sale”, is the compromise candidate. But you know what they say that if it is not the original, though it may not be fake, it ain’t the original.

    Agbata ekee is Igbo colloquial phrase which roughly translated means: to share illegal gains or booty. It can also be interpreted as commissioned agents. Yoruba has a similar but more sinister version of the same phrase known as apa pin. Short, bullet-shaped and morbidly penetrating, it roughly translates to ‘slaughter and share’. In the sense of savage hunters and also in the sense of putting down national patrimony and parceling it.

    This is the feeling one gets these days as we cruise inexorably to election day. It is actually a season of endorsements and all manner of groups are hawking the ‘hot’ commodity to anyone who would pay. Well, all is also fair in politics you may say but when supposedly respectable elders who are supposed to be our guiding light in times of national crisis are neck-deep in it, then there is cause for alarm.

    Examples are numerous but let’s highlight a few. Afenifere, an influential Yoruba group led by eminent men and women, have long endorsed President Goodluck Jonathan. Their reason? He is the only person who can implement the decisions of the National Conference. Sounds like a baby babbling, abi?

    Ohaneze, the Igbo socio-cultural group, has been boiling in the cauldron of its own insouciance for some time now – endorsing and de-endorsing until it does not even matter to anyone anymore. Last Friday, in one national newspaper, a page 7 report had, “ Ohaneze fails to endorse any candidate,” while a full page colour advertorial on page 44, apparently from another faction endorsed President Jonathan. Igbo ‘leaders’ scrambling for a pot of porridge.

    Ndigbo Lagos, the inconsequential group with hardly any influence, has also declared a blanket endorsement; so is another mushroom body called Igbo Leaders of Thought, which is a racket run by barely half a dozen people. It has neither leadership nor thought and its endorsement would ordinarily not add any value to any candidate. But endorsement happens to be a seasonal business so they might as well make the best of the season.

    No one seems to be immune to the political flu being spread by the biggest party in Black Africa. Former military president, Ibrahim Babangida, needed a quick back flip and a touch of equivocation to catch the attention of the gravy train. In a ‘bold’ interview he had said that he was not sure he would vote his party’s presidential candidate. And pronto, Mr. Candidate dashed to the hilltop and swiftly, the ‘oracle; on the hilltop upped the ante by equivocating some more. “Nigeria under Jonathan is in safe hands,” he fobbed. But can you beat this: One child of his leads the campaign for PDP and another for APC; all in Niger State. Pure genius you say?

    Well with elders like this, you can only have a country like Nigeria?

  • APC elders fault Jonathan‘s campaign outbursts

    APC elders fault Jonathan‘s campaign outbursts

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) Elders’ Forum in Ekiti State has advised President Goodluck Jonathan to pull out of the presidential race for admitting failure in governance during the launch of his campaign in Lagos.

    The body, which described the outburst of the President at the Lagos rally as “unpresidential, clearly offensive, aggressive, combative and appalling”, said Jonathan had shown that he lacked solutions to the myriads of problems facing the country.

    The group’s Publicity Secretary, Dr. Bayo Orire, said Jonathan failed to use his campaign to convince Nigerians of his readiness to stop the slide of the country into deeper socio-economic ills.

    Orire said Nigerians should not expect a purposeful leadership from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)-led administration by the tone of the President’s speech, which he said dwelt much on attacks on personalities rather than issues.

    He urged the electorate to vote for the APC’s presidential candidate, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, who he believed has the integrity, maturity and experience needed to turn around the nation’s fortunes.

    The medical doctor-turned politician said if successive administrations built on the anti-corruption stance of the military administration led by Buhari, corruption would have ended in the polity.

    Orire explained that corruption would grow under the PDP administration, urging Nigerians to use their votes to send the umbrella party out of power.

    He regretted that Jonathan failed to convince Nigerians on how he would solve insurgency, low level of industrialisation, unemployment, non-existent mechanised farming and general decay in infrastructure.

    “The President disappointed many Nigerians with his outing in Lagos on Thursday and this has shown that he lacks the capacity to take the country out of the woods.

    “Jonathan extrapolated wrongly putting something that happened 30 years ago on top of what should be done today.

    “How would the solution that was appropriate for the low level of corruption that was experienced in the past be appropriate for today’s roof-top malady that we call corruption?

    “He forgot that as in the 80s, there was little known about ICT to pay salaries. He forgot that you could pick people who were corrupt, they were visible unlike today.

    “He forgot that when Buhari was in office, the people were queuing for buses. Nobody could throw rubbish on the streets. If the pace had been kept up, there would not have been corruption today in Nigeria.

    “Judging from the campaign speech of the President, we should expect a purposeless leadership worse than what we are seeing now. The PDP had ruled us for 16 years and we are worse for it.

    “We advise him to pull out of the race because he has told us that he would need a younger and more cerebral generation to rule this country.

    “But we in the APC believe in maturity borne out of experience. We believe in team work where we can pool the sharpness of the young brains and the experience of the old.

    “The President was talking of people not having brains in the APC. If nobody has brains in the APC, nobody has a skull in the PDP.”

  • Christian elders decry Mbaka’s comment on Jonathan

    Christian elders decry Mbaka’s comment on Jonathan

    The Southern Nigeria Christian Elders’ Forum (SOCEF) yesterday faulted the “prophetic message” of Enugu Catholic Priest, Rev. Fr. Ejike Mbaka, on President Goodluck Jonathan.,

    Addressing reporters after their meeting in Enugu, it said Mbaka’s message was his opinion and not from the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.,

    The meeting was attended by archbishops, bishops and other Christian leaders from the Southwest, Southsouth and Southeast, including Most Rev. A.N.C. Anikwenwa, Bishop Peter Ogunmuyiwa, Most Rev. Caleb Maduoma, Rev. Felix Ekiye, among others.,

    No Catholic bishop was in attendance.

    The Chairman of the forum, Bishop David Eberechukwu, who spoke, said it was not the first time Rev. Fr. Mbaka would make such claims.,

    He went on: “In 2003, Mbaka said that then Governor Chimaroke Nnamani would not get re-election and that if that happened, he would remove his cassock. Indeed, Chimaroke was re-elected and up till today, he has not removed his cassock.,

    “So, his message is just a personal opinion; it didn’t come from the impulse of the Holy Spirit.”,

    * In a 10-point communiqué by the group, read by Bishop Eberechukwu, it said for the sake of equity and fairness, President Jonathan should be allowed to complete a second tenure on behalf of the Southsouth.,

    “We note that the Southwest occupied the seat of the presidency for eight years, from 1999-2007. It was on the basis of the principle of rotation that the next President came from the Northwest. If the cold hands of death had not taken him away,  that occupant would have been re-elected.,

    “In the light of the above, it is our considered view and advice as Christians and citizens of this country that the Southsouth be given the same opportunity of a second term. Therein lies political equity, accommodation and stability.”,

    Speaking on the need for stronger ties among the states in the zone, the forum urged the governors of the states in Southern Nigeria “to revitalise the Southern Nigeria Governors’ Forum for the sake of political co-operation and development.”,

    SOCEF expressed concern about  the plight of Christians in the North as well as “the challenges the nation faces, following the Boko Haram insurgency and political tension.,

    “We note with dismay and deep sorrow, the plight of our Christian brethren in the North, the siege and persecution against them as a result of their faith, and urge all forces, federal, state and local governments, well-meaning leaders- local and international, to come to the aid of our Christian brethren in the North., “

     

  • Akwa Ibom: Oron threaten militancy over governorship impasse

    Akwa Ibom: Oron threaten militancy over governorship impasse

    Elders, youths and women from the five local government areas in Oro, Akwa Ibom State, protested yesterday at Oron, the headquarters of Oron Local Government Area, over the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship ticket.

    They were angry that the party did not give its ticket to an Oro indigene for next year’s election.

    The protesters threatened to take to militancy, if their request was not granted.

    They accused Governor Godswill Akpabio and the state PDP of scheming out Oro from the governorship ticket, which they said was their turn to have.

    The Oro said the governor’s action and the state PDP’s collaboration had caused trouble for the party since the December 8 governorship primary.

    The protesters, it was learnt, planned to go on with the action for one week.

    Markets and other commercial activities were closed while banks rendered skeletal services.

    The President-General of Oron Union, the highest policy-making body of the Oro, Chief Asuquo Iniukim, accused Akpabio of robbing the Oro of their right to produce a governor for the state through next year’s election, after waiting for 27 years.

    He said his people would not accept any other arrangement from the governor and the PDP.

    The youth vowed to bomb oil platforms and gas plants in Oro land and waters, if the PDP failed to present an Oro indigene as its governorship candidate in next year’s election.

    Angry elders and youths said the Presidency and the state government had taken the Oro for granted for too long, adding that it was time to show that the Oro were not docile.