Tag: Election tribunal

  • Abia election tribunal and quest for justice

    On Sunday, August 2, it was reported that the office of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in Obingwa Local Government Area of Abia state was razed down by unknown elements. It does appear the new mantra of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the state is “If at first you don’t succeed, destroy all evidence and blame it on your opponent.’’

    That members of the PDP would attribute the fire to the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and its governorship candidate in the April general elections, Dr. Alex Otti, was the most irresponsible and ludicrous accusation I have ever heard. As usual, nothing they did in the past and have continued to do in order to hold on to power surprises me anymore.

    These are the same people who accused Otti of sewing military uniforms for a couple of men during the campaigns. They later sent armed men, who invaded his residence at Umuru-Nvosi in Isialangwa South Local Government Area of the state ostensibly to kill him. The same people whose thugs tore up Otti’s billboards, attacked his campaign events in Ikwuano and Ntigha in Isialangwa North Local Government Areas.

    Again after the elections, when some unscrupulous officials of INEC in the state were arrested by security agents at the INEC headquarters in Umuahia with Card Readers and other electoral materials, PDP shamelessly said the suspects were working for Otti and APGA, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Just last week after an unsuccessful assassination attempt was made on Otti in Abuja, Governor Okezie Ikpeazu and his media hands characteristically jumped on the matter, accusing Otti of making up the story so as to generate public sympathy even after the police authorities had confirmed the incident.

    This is why their recent accusation about the fire at INEC did not come as a surprise.

    I think this time they have finally outdone themselves. This time they have actually shot themselves in the foot. Having failed in all their previous efforts to derail the tribunal, the most recent being their failure to get Otti’s petition dismissed, they finally decided to destroy the evidence that was supposed to be brought to the tribunal for forensic examination by Otti’s team.

    Let us not forget that both the PDP and INEC previously conspired to refuse Alex Otti’s legal team access to those materials, in spite the tribunal’s order. So far they have got away with almost everything they have done. But let us see if they can get away with this one.

    Iam not a lawyer but I know that there is in law, something called the “Theory of spoliation”. In a layman’s language, it says that ‘“when a party destroys evidence, it may be reasonable to infer that the party had “consciousness of guilt” or motivation to avoid the evidence”.

    A good example of the application of this concept was a case in Texas, United States in 2013. It was a case named Brookshire brothers Ltd VS Aldridge 2013 . As reported, Jerry Aldridge had taken the bookstore to court for an injury he had sustained in the store when he slipped and fell. Aldridge with the assistance of his attorney discovered that the bookstore which had earlier refused them access to video footage of the incident, destroyed some video footage and withheld some from them.

    The judge found that the evidence destruction and the refusal to provide the additional video constituted spoliation and as a consequence the jury awarded Aldridge $1million in damage. Even though not all spoliation inference may be warranted depending on the circumstance, in this particular instance of the burning down of Obingwa INEC office, the issue is whether spoliation cannot be rightfully inferred.

    Long before the Abia tribunal started sitting, many in the opposing camp had wondered why Otti would not let bygones be bygones and go on with his life. My answer to that is yes, he could have done that, but it would have been a let down to the hundreds of thousands of Abia electorate who voted for him. The truth also is that even though Otti is the one who filed the petition, the real people behind the petition are Abia citizens. In doing so Dr Otti must have  hearkened  to the words of Ellie Wiesel, the Jewish holocaust  survivor and hunter of German Second World War criminals who once said – “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we must fail to protest”. To which Martin Luther King lent these words, “Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable. Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering and struggle, the tireless exercise and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.”

    Otti is a tireless crusader for justice but let the word go forth, loud and clear that he is not in the struggle alone. There are hundreds of thousands of Abia people both at home and in Diaspora who are with him, who believe in him and his cause because his cause is theirs as well.

    Human history has always been shaped from numberless diverse acts of courage as exemplified by Otti and each time a man like him stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope which in time builds a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and injustice.

    It is said that the cry of the poor is not always just, but then, the reality is that if we don’t listen to it, we will never know what justice is. There is a reason why hundreds of thousands of Abia citizens are crying and yearning for justice. There is a reason why they agonized and continue to agonize his electoral loss by trooping out to the tribunal venue each time it is sitting.

    Ours over the years have been a country where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails and where one class is made to feel it has no chance before our justice system and to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress, rob and degrade them. Ours is a country where for too long we talk about election rigging. Something whose negative impact we recognize and condemn. An act which those who participate in it enjoy, those in power ignore and we the citizens acknowledge but tolerate.

    As the case progresses, we will hope and pray for justice, as justice is the first virtue of social institutions, the same way truth is of a system of thought.As the legal jurist, John Rawls once wrote, “In a just society, there must be liberties of equal citizenship and the rights served by justice are not subject to political bargaining or the calculation of social interest.”

    Those who committed the crime of burning down the Obingwa INEC office must be made to pay for this crime. If and when it is proven that this was an act committed by PDP agents, the tribunal justices must apply the theory of spoliation whether or not it is part of Nigeria’s case law.

    ‘Those who committed the crime of burning down the Obingwa INEC office must be made to pay for this crime. If and when it is proven that this was an act committed by PDP agents, the tribunal justices must apply the theory of spoliation whether or not it is part of Nigeria’s case law’

    I would urge for reinforced security for the honorable justices as well as the court premises. These enemies of justice are ruthless and are very determined to hold on to power.

     

    • Ijomah writes from New York

     

  • Akwa Ibom tribunal adjourns sitting

    The Governorship Election Petition Tribunal for Akwa Ibom, has adjourned its sitting till July 14 to enable the All Progressive Congress (APC) and its candidate, Umana Umana inspect materials used by INEC for the April 11 governorship election.

    The Tribunal Chairman, Justice Sadiq Umar, adjourned the case on Monday at the sitting of the tribunal at the FCT High Court complex, Abuja.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Justice Umar-led-three man tribunal is sitting on a petition filed by Umana and his party, seeking to nullify the election of Governor Emmanuel Udom of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    Justice Umar said the adjournment was to give time to the petitioners to go through the polling documents in INEC office in Abuja.

    He directed parties to the petition to come early to court with their witnesses on the adjourned date
    NAN recalls that the tribunal on June 24 ordered INEC to move all polling documents and results sheets used for the April 11 governorship polls from Uyo to Abuja within 10 days to allow the petitioner have access to them.

    Justice Umar had also directed the Inspector General of Police to provide adequate security for INEC while moving the election materials from Uyo to Abuja.

    The judge had also ordered the police and the State Security Services to jointly provide security to Umana and his legal team when they are carrying out the inspection of the election materials.

  • Ekiti: Tribunal rules against application on card reader printout

    The Ekiti State Election Petition Tribunal has dismissed the application of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Ekiti Central senatorial candidate Gbenga Olofin seeking the release of the printout of the card reader used for the election.

    Olofin and the APC are challenging the election of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate Mrs. Fatimat Rasaki in the March 28 National Assembly election conducted in the senatorial district.

    Other defendants in the case are PDP, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Resident Electoral Commissioner, Nigeria Police Force, Inspector General of Police and Nigerian Army.

    APC candidate claimed in his petition that the 1st Respondent (Mrs. Rasaki) was not duly elected by the majority of votes cast.

    Olofin also averred that the election and return of the 1st Respondent is invalid by reasons of corrupt practices and non-compliance with the provisions of Electoral Act 2010 (as amended).

    Tribunal Chairman Justice A. N. Erhabor who delivered the ruling at the panel’s sitting on Wednesday said the APC candidate’s prayer failed because the petitioners did not cite any authority backing their request.

    Justice Erhabor also held that the petitioners did not adduce any cogent reason for the application to be granted by the three-man jury.

    The tribunal adjourned sitting on the petition to June 26.

    Reacting shortly after the tribunal rose, counsel to the petitioners, Femi George, said the ruling would not affect the substantive matter before the tribunal.

    George explained that the “card reader printout sought is just infinitesimal compared with the avalanche of evidence available to prove that the senatorial poll was marred by irregularities.”

    Ekiti Central APC spokesman Tai Oguntayo expressed dismay with the ruling wondering why INEC objected to the application to compel it to produce the printout of the card reader used for the election.

    Oguntayo said; “Although the ruling will not have any serious effect on the deluge of evidence we have to challenge Mrs Raji Rasaki’s victory.

     

    “We still believe that if INEC is not hiding anything, it should not have objected our application for the print out.

    “The print-out was produced by INEC in Rivers and Benue States where startling revelations had emerged.”

     

  • Election Tribunal: Ihedioha vows to reclaim mandate

    Election Tribunal: Ihedioha vows to reclaim mandate

    Lead counsel to honourable Emeka Ihedioha, the Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) governorship candidate in Imo state, Chief Mike Ahamba (SAN) Wednesday vowed to reclaim the mandate of his client using every avenue within the ambits of the law.

    Ahamba who stated this during the inaugural sitting of the governorship Election Petition Tribunal in Owerri insisted that his client will get justice and be declared the winner at the end of the sitting or have the election nullified for a fresh one.

    According to him, “our target is to return Emeka Ihedioha to the Government House or in alternative to have the election nullified, we pray we don’t miss both, we are ready for the attitude of the respondents to prevent the hearings”.

    However, the Chairman of the election Petition Tribunal, Justice David Wyom in his inaugural speech warned the parties against abusive words as well as restricting the visitation of the Panel by all parties concerned in the election.

    While disclosing that the Panel has just one hundred and eighty days to conclude on the election matters, he also warned the parties involved to avoid acts capable of delaying proceedings in any matter as the Panel he noted, is committed to a speedy judgment.

    “It is also pertinent in our view, to use this opportunity to warn that this tribunal will not tolerate any act from any quarters, capable of compromising any or all its members, the staff of the secretariat or appearing to impugn its integrity,” he stated.

    Meanwhile, the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Chukwuma Machukwu Umeh has expressed confidence in the panel delivering justice at the end of the sitting.

  • Rivers APC heads for election tribunal

    Rivers APC heads for election tribunal

    •Says poll fraud won’t stand 

    •Party to boycott today’s rescheduled polls in Rivers, Bayelsa

    The Rivers State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has disclosed that it is about to conclude arrangements to storm the state Election Tribunal to reclaim its mandate, which it claimed was stolen by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in connivance with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Police during the governorship polls of April 11.

    In a press release made available to newsmen on Friday and signed by the SSA Media and Public Affairs to the State Chairman, APC Rivers State, Chief Eze Chukwuemeka Eze, the Rivers State APC Chairman, Dr. Davies Ibiamu Ikanya, reassured the people of the state that the mandate which they freely gave to the party and to its governorship candidate, Dr. Dakuku Peterside, would soon be retrieved for the good of the future of the state.

    According to the statement, “This brazen electoral theft by Chief Nyesome Wike and his PDP gangsters cannot be allowed to stand. These power-drunk anti-democratic elements, in their desperation for power, were not discreet in their electoral fraud that saw the allocation of a bogus over a million votes to Chief Wike. The documents and video tapes so far assembled will surely see many Rivers INEC and PDP chieftains being thrown into jail at the end of the day,” Ikanya said.

    Rivers APC declared that it has an iron-cast case against Wike and PDP, saying that it is not surprised that Wike, who cannot win up to 30 per cent of the votes in a free and fair election in Rivers State, is now desperately running from pillar to post in a bid to prevent the APC from going to the Tribunal.

    “We wish to appeal to our members and the entire people of Rivers State to remain calm and resolute as the party goes to the Tribunal to retrieve their stolen mandate. Our case is as clear as daylight, as even Prof. Wole Soyinka, Ambassador John Endwistle of the United States of America, the European Union Electoral Observers and other international bodies have since testified that the elections purportedly conducted in Rivers State were a sham,” Ikanaya stated.

    Meanwhile, ahead of today’s rescheduled state assembly poll in the state, the candidates of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for the state assembly in the six constituencies in Rivers State, where the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) rescheduled election for today have disclosed that they are boycotting the exercise.

    The aggrieved candidates also said that they have obtained a court injunction restraining INEC from conducting the rescheduled election, which INEC has said would hold today.

    Speaking on behalf of the candidates in Port Harcourt yesterday, Hon. Chid Llyod, who is currently the lawmaker representing Emohua constituency, listed many reasons for the boycott, chief of which was that they have lost confidence in the state Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), Dame Gesila Khan to conduct a free and fair election.

    Llyod also said that “there has been no official communication by INEC to us and our party, the APC, about the so called elections to be supervised by Gesila Khan, whose handling of the recent elections has been most controversial.”

    Llyod also said that with the heavy presence of armed militants during the April 11, 2015 election, they cannot guarantee the safety of their own lives, their supporters and other voters.

    The APC candidates, who quoted the reference numbers of the court injunction which they obtained from the Federal High Court, Port Harcourt on Friday, also added that all the relevant parties in the case have been duly served.

    The constituencies where INEC said it would re-run the election are: Emohua; Etche 1; Etche 11; Ahoada East 1 and Ahoada East 11.

    In a similar development, candidates of the All Progressive Congress (APC) and 12 other political parties in Bayelsa State yesterday declared their resolution to boycott the elections rescheduled to hold today in eight state House of Assembly constituencies.

    INEC had postponed elections in the eight constituencies, citing insufficient electoral materials.

    But a coalition of 13 political parties, including the APC, in a press briefing in Yenagoa, said they pulled out of the elections after discovering that the state office of INEC had entered into a “concrete agreement” with the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to undo other parties.

    The parties, in a statement signed by the Chairman of the APC, Mr. Tiwe Oruminighe, and other leaders of the concerned parties, said INEC and PDP had perfected a plot to hoard all sensitive materials meant for the election.

    “Their ploy is to hoard all the sensitive electoral materials, result sheets inclusive, such that after the conduct of the election with non-sensitive materials, INEC staff, the electoral officers of the eight local government in the state will converge at designated places to enter their manufactured results into the original result sheets in favour of PDP”, they said.

    The aggrieved parties further accused PDP of perfecting an illegal arrangement to use the military to intimidate, harass and muzzle other candidates and genuine voters to favour the PDP candidates.

    The parties said they chose to boycott the elections to avoid bloodshed, destruction and maiming which could be provoked by the “wicked intentions” of PDP and INEC.

    Party leaders who signed the statement are Gerebo Joseph (UDP), Abbey Daniel (APA), Helen Okorodas (ACD), Tukuwei Powede (ACPN), Bezi William (UPP) and Olomu Ebiowei (LP),

    Others are Edwin Tare (DPP), King-George Lucky (CPP), Isaac Eze (MPPP), Oniekpe Prince (SDP) and Owei-tongu Woniwei (AD).

    However, the state chapter of Conference of Nigeria Political Parties, (CNPP), dissociated itself from the boycott.

    The reasons adduced for the boycott, according to a statement signed by Chairman of the CNPP, Mr. Lucky Akpeli, were not strong enough.

  • Osun election tribunal lawyer Kalejaye for trial July 16

    Osun election tribunal lawyer Kalejaye for trial July 16

    The Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) (aka Body of Benchers) has set July 16 for hearing of a petition against Mr. Kunle Kalejaiye (SAN).

    Kalejaiye is the lawyer accused of having a telephone conversation with the now sacked Justice Thomas Naron during the sitting of the Osun State Election Petition Tribunal.

    Justice Narom was the Chairman of the tribunal that heard the petition filed by the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and its candidate, Rauf Aregbesola, against the election that got the now sacked Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola to office.

    The National Judicial Council (NJC) recommended Justice Naron’s sack after considering the petition against him.

    Plateau State Governor Jonah Jang subsequently accepted the recommendation and sacked Naron, a State High Court judge.

    Kalejaiye is one of the 24 lawyers to be tried by the LPDC during its sitting slated for between July 15 and 18 at the Court of Appeal Headquarters in Abuja.

    According to an advertorial signed by LPDC’s Secretary, Mrs H. A. Turaki, Kalejaiye’s case file is marked: BB/LPDC/115.

    Those whose cases are due to be heard on July 16 include Bisi Oyinloye and Babatunde Shonekan.

    On July 15, the committee will hear nine cases and rule on the case against A. A. Ibebunjo, marked BB/LPDC/113.

    Others include cases against A. R. Maduabuchi, Olawale Ojoge-Daniel, G. C. Monyei, Temidayo Eseyin, A. T. Ahembe, Azubike Okeke, Chikwendu Kalu, M. DM Ndupu and Lanre Kareem.

    The committee will on July 17 hear the cases involving Anthony Ojigbo, I. O. Harrison, Gabriel Gbenoba, George Adiele, Ola Ogunbiyi, Adekunle Sulaiman and Remi Onifade.

    On July 18, the committee will consider the petitions against Akintunde Oyetunde, Olu Dairo, Victor Chiedu Nwoye, Chidi Uburu and Imoh Obot Golden.

  • Ondo poll: CPC candidate barred from tribunal venue

    Ondo poll: CPC candidate barred from tribunal venue

    Drama ensued at the venue of Ondo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal on Tuesday as men of the State Security Service barred the governorship candidate of Congress for Progressive Change in the state last gubernatorial poll, Prince Soji Ehinlanwo, from entering the court room.

    Ehinlanwo, who led the state executives of the party to the tribunal sitting, was among the four petitioners challenging the victory of the Labour Party Candidate, Dr.Olusegun Mimiko.

    The CPC flagbearer arrived the court premises in time, but was prevented from entering the court room despite identifying himself as CPC governorship candidate who should show his appearance to members of the election panel before the commencement of proceedings.

    This development led to uproar between the SSS and supporters of CPC, who alleged that the security operatives had been selective in their screening, by giving undue advantage to the LP members.

    It took the intervention of some senior officials at the tribunal before Ehinlanwo and the party executives were allowed entry into the court room.

    Speaking with our correspondent shortly after the session, Ehinlanwo, who condemned the attitude of SSS, said he didn’t understand why the security operatives wanted to bar him from the tribunal sitting.