Tag: ELECTION

  • Eight CPs, not 30, deployed for Osun governorship election

    Contrary to earlier reports that 30 Commissioners of Police (CPs) would be deployed for the forthcoming governorship election in Osun State, the Police said yesterday that only eight CPs would be deployed in the state.

    According to the Police, the senior police officers expected to supervise security arrangements in the state would man the eight area commands and not each local government as reported.

    The election is slated for September 22, 2018.

    The clarification is contained in a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Spokesman, Ag. DCP Jimoh Moshood, yesterday.

    The statement reads: “The attention of the Nigeria Police Force has been drawn to publications in some sections of the media reporting that 30 Commissioners of Police will be deployed to supervise security arrangements for the Osun State gubernatorial election coming up on 22nd September, 2018.

    “The Force wishes to categorically state that the Inspector General of Police, Ibrahim Idris, during a one-day seminar on imperativeness of Police collaboration with essential stakeholders towards secured, free, fair and credible elections in Nigeria, held in Oshogbo, Osun State on 30th August, 2018,  mentioned that there are eight area commands in Osun State and a Commissioner of Police will be deployed to man each Area Command to supervise security arrangements for the Osun State gubernatorial election and not a Commissioner of Police to a local government in the state as reported.

    “Consequently, critical stakeholders and the general public are enjoined to discountenance and disregard the report.

    “Only eight Commissioners of Police, one to each Police Area command, will be deployed in Osun State to supervise security arrangements in the forthcoming gubernatorial election in Osun State.”

     

  • Ekiti Election Results: Fayemi (APC) 197,459 Eleka (PDP) 178,121

    Results of the Ekiti Governorship election declared by Local Government Collation officers at State Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)  office in Ado Ekiti.

    Ilejemeje LG

    APC 4,156

    PDP 3,937

    Irepodun LG

    APC13,869

    PDP 11,456

    Idi Osi LG

    APC 12,342

    PDP 11,145

    Oye LG

    APC  14,995

    PDP 11,271

    Efon LG

    APC 5,028

    PDP 5,192

    Moba LG

    APC 11,837

    PDP 8,520

    Ijero LG

    APC , 14,192

    PDP 11,077

    Gbonyi LG

    APC 11,498

    PDP 8,027

    Emure LG

    APC 7,048

    PDP 7,121

    Ikere LG

    APC 11,515

    PDP 17,183

    Ekiti West LG

    APC 12,648

    PDP 10,137

    Ikole LG

    APC 14,522

    PDP 13,961

    Ise Orun LG

    APC 11,908

    PDP 6,297

    Ekiti East 

    APC 12,778

    PDP 11,544

    Ekiti South West

    APC 11,015

    PDP ,8423

    Ado LG 

    APC 28,111

    PDP 32,810

  • Highest bidder may win election, group warns

    Youth Initiative for Advocacy, Growth and Advancement (YIAGA) Africa has said that the Ekiti governorship election may be determined by the highest bidder due to prevalence of vote-buying.

    Executive Director of the group, Mr Samson Itodo, said this in a presentation on the pre-observation of the election made available to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja.

    Itodo said that YIAGA Africa deployed 500 observers in its “Watching the Vote (WTV)” project to monitor statistical sample of 250 polling units located in all the 16 local government areas of the state.

    He said that YIAGA AFRICA was worried about the level of voter-inducement in the state by politicians and their supporters.

    “Cash and material inducements such as free Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) or fuel for petrol engines are doled out to voters in exchanges for their votes.

    “This ugly trend of voter inducement or vote-buying undermines the political legitimacy and makes a mockery of our democracy.

    “We are concerned that this election may be determined by the highest bidder if the Independent National Electoral Commission does not take intentional steps to protect the secrecy of the ballot.”

    Itodo said that 29 per cent of the observers reported seeing the distribution of money or gift items by candidates in Ekiti East, Ekiti West, Gbonyin, Ido/Osi, Ijero, Ilejemeje and Irepodun/Ifelodun Local Government Areas.

    He said that 50 per cent of the observers also heard additional reports of such acts taking place in Ado-Ekiti, Efon, Ekiti South-West, Emure, Ikole and Oye.

    He advised voters to resist any attempt by politicians to subvert the process through material inducement or cash, and urged them to cast their votes according to their preferences.

    He also said that the group observed that hate speech and inciting statements by key political actors in the state, especially the dominant political parties, was on an increasing level in the state.

    Itodo said that unguarded statements could lead to a breach of peace in the state.

    He advised key contenders in the governorship race to desist from making inciting statements and urge their supporters to refrain from any act that could potentially result in electoral violence.

    He also urged the security agencies to sanction any individual or group propagating hate speech in the run-up to the election.

    Itodo said that YIAGA AFfrica’s WTV was also concerned about issues capable of undermining the credibility of the election, if not addressed.

    He said that judging from history, YIAGA Africa was concerned that polling officials would not adhere to INEC directive or comply with the guideline.

    He insisted that pasting results of the election at the polling units would enhance the integrity of the elections.

    The director of the group advised that Supervising Polling Officers (SPOs) and INEC monitors should ensure that Presiding Officers posted the polling unit results at the polling units using FORM EC 60 E, summary of results.

    He said that INEC should also endeavour that all polling staff who flouted the directive were duly sanctioned.

    Itodo said that the WTV Project would closely observe the newly-piloted e-collation process, and urged INEC to ensure transparency and openness in the result collation and transmission process.

    He also encouraged voters to take pictures of the results posted at the polling unit using the FORM EC 60 E, adding that collation centres were accessible to accredited observers, party agents and media.

    Itodo said that experience had shown that duly accredited observers and journalists were sometimes denied access to collation centres at the ward and local government level by security agencies.

    He appealed to INEC and the security agencies to ensure that accredited party agents and observers were granted access to collation centres as their presence would enhance the integrity of the process.

    (NAN).

  • Once upon a Fourth of July

    Following the official acknowledgment of Chief MKO Abiola as winner of the 1993 presidential election and the proclamation of June 12 as “Democracy Day,” Walter Carrington, former United States ambassador to Nigeria, has figured prominently on practically every roster of persons who deserve to be honoured for their momentous contributions to the struggle to re-establish government based on the consent of the people.

    Carrington’s tour of duty coincided with a period when all the things Nigerians said could never happen in their country happened time and again. There was, first, the contrived confusion in the run-up to the presidential election, the capstone of a transition that had been eight years in the making.  Then the annulment, the Interim farce, and the infernal Sani Abacha.

    Through it all, Carrington lived up the title of his collection of his speeches, “A Duty to Speak” he released to mark his to 80th birthday.  In that time of tyranny, he never flinched from speaking truth to power.

    Among my many interactions with him, one in particular clings in my memory.  It was the Fourth of July reception in 1997, marking the 221st independence anniversary of the United States.

    Even for a time of year when the skies parted and seemed in no hurry to close up, the rain that fell that Friday morning was unusually heavy.  And it threatened to wash out the most eagerly awaited event in the diplomatic calendar.

    Then, it lifted just as suddenly as it had begun.  The clouds dispersed, and bright sunshine suffused the landscape.  A cool, crisp wind wafting across from the sea that provides a stunning backdrop to the official residence of the Ambassador of the United States dissolved the muggy heat of the preceding days.  Nature in its mysterious ways had turned adversity to advantage.

    By 4:30 p.m, the grounds thronged with guests.  Everyone who was somebody, thought he was somebody or aspired to be somebody, was there.  Stewards in their starched, snow-white uniforms drifted with clockwork precision from one cluster of guests to another, offering trays of tantalising snacks.  Other stewards followed with cocktails.

    In small and large groups, long-lost friends and comrades and colleagues carried on animated chatter about – what else – the latest barbarities that Sani Abacha and his confederates had visited on the people, the general hopelessness to which they had sentenced their compatriots, and the indifference of an international community daily terrorised by Foreign Minister Tom Ikimi’s gangsta diplomacy.

    Freed at least for the moment from fear of being abducted, kidnapped, disappeared, mugged, or killed in a drive-by shooting, they compared notes, reviewed strategy and tactics,, and planned the way forward.

    Some notorious secret and -not-so-secret agents of the Abacha regime had infiltrated the reception in one guise or disguise, but it was easy to keep them at bay or avoid them altogether.

    All too soon, it was time for the main event.

    Carrington took his place at the podium.  One step behind him stood his elegant Nigeria-born wife Arese.  To his right, a United States marine stood at ramrod attention, cradling the Stars and Stripes.

    On the occasion of his country’s independence anniversary, Carrington began, nothing would be more fitting than revisiting  the circumstances that had led  British colonies in the New World  to renounce foreign rule way back in 1776, and the very words that had inspired and sustained the struggle unto victory.

    Whereupon he began to read in that resonant and sometimes haunting baritone, the storied text of the (American) Declaration of Independence.

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and they are endowed by their Creator with rights that, among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted among them, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter it, and to institute a new government.”

    The authors of the Declaration never really held these propositions to be truths, of course, much less self-evident truths. Black people did not count as men and women, only as property to be bought and sold and put to the most brutal exertions. They had no rights whatsoever.  More than There has been great progress. Carrington is himself a symbol of that progress. But in the daily lives of a great many black Americans, the “color line,” as Du Bois, called it, remains almost as formidable an obstacle in the 21st century as it was in the 20th.

    On that day, however, in that place and at that time, the lofty ideals of the Declaration counted for much more than its inconvenient truths.

    A hush fell upon the assembly.

    “All experience has shown,” Carrington continued, his voice precisely modulated, “that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while the evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.  But when a long line of abuses and usurpations evince a desire to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such a government, and to provide new grounds for their future security.”

    It was as if time itself and indeed all the elements stood still,  The only thing astir was that haunting, almost taunting, baritone, projected far and wide by the public address system and the wind.

    But Carrington was not yet done.

    “The history of the present king is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States.

    “To prove this, let the facts be submitted to a candid judge.

    “He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions of the right of the people

    “. . . He has incited domestic insurrection among us.

    “A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

    The hush had deepened with Carrington’s rendering of each line of the litany of woes residents of the American colonies suffered during British rule. But virtually every line reflected the barbarities the loathsome General Sani Abacha and his regime were visiting upon the Nigerian public.

    By the time Carrington was done, the whole thing had taken on an unsettling resemblance to the proverbial calm before the raging storm. The assembled guests looked nervously at one another, shook their heads in sorrow and sighed deeply in despair and unspoken rage.

    If Carrington had ended this command performance by saying nothing more electrifying than “Eminent sons and daughters of Nigeria, the future of your country lies in hour hands,” I suspect that most of the guests would have yanked off their ornately embroidered apparel and fancy suits and stormed Bonny Camp and Kam Selem House.  And the revolution would have begun in earnest.

    Abacha never forgave Carrington.  The regime’s propagandists put it about that Carrington was embittered because the government had refused to “settle” him with a lucrative oil concession.

    In reprisal, Abacha renamed Eleke Crescent, which threads the embassies and missions in Victoria Island, Lagos, for the Rev Louis Farrakhan, America’s bête noire and leader of the Nation of Islam.  The official address of the U. S. Consulate, previously 2 Eleke Crescent, became 2 Louis FarrakhanCrescent.

    To spite Abacha’s confederates, and in grateful acknowledgment of the ambassador’s support  for the democratic forces at a crucial moment in Nigeria’s history, Lagos State Governor Bola  Tinubu re-branded the road Walter Carrington Crescent, the name it bears to this day.

    In the back and forth, a bit of national history was erased.  I gather that Eleke, for whom the street was originally renamed, was until his retirement a highly-regarded official who had served as a pillar of the Ministry of External Affairs in the years following independence.  Curiously,  no one seems to remember his first name.

    But I digress.

    As further reprisal, Abacha’s goons invaded a private residence where a reception was being held for Carrington on the eve of his departure from Nigeria, on the preposterous pretext that they had received reports that “armed robbers” were operating in the neighbourhood. When the guests relocated to another venue, the regime’s goons followed them there and dispersed them.

    While all this was going on, the regime celebrated Carrington’s departure as a signal achievement of Ikimi’s “area boy” diplomacy.

    Today, Abacha and his enablers are justly held in loathing abhorrence.  But Walter Carrington who spoke truth to power in the time of tyranny stands splendidly vindicated.

    Whatever the flaws of the men who wrote the American Declaration of Independence, its noble sentiments have inspired a nobler vision and animated struggles for freedom and justice across continents and generations.

    Its words have not changed.

    But on this Fourth of July, with Donald Trump in the saddle – Trump, the demagogic, xenophobic, race-baiting repudiation of almost every noble sentiment espoused in the Declaration, their resonance is much diminished.

     

    • This is an expanded version of a previous column
  • NGO deploys 541 observers for election

    A Civil society organisation, the Youth Initiative for Advocacy, Growth and Advancement (YIAGA), is to deploy 541 election observers for the July 14 governorship election in Ekiti State.

    The group will also have 24 long-term observers and 25 stationary observers and one collation observer in each local government.

    YIAGA commenced observations for the July 14 governorship election on May 25 and would remain in the state till July 11, to ensure that the Ekiti election is free, fair and credible.

    YIAGA made the disclosure in Ado-Ekiti, the Ekiti State capital at its media round table discussion tagged “Watching the Vote”, held with print and broadcast media representatives.

    The group said “Watching the Vote” is a citizen-led election observation initiative aimed at enhancing the integrity of elections, using technology and evidence-based research methodology tools for election observation.

    YIAGA said it has noticed some issues such as security, compliance with results counting and announcement guidelines and access to collation centres, which are capable of undermining the credibility of elections, if not addressed.

    While addressing reporters at the forum, Mr. Moshood Isah (Media Officer), Paul James (Training Manager), Cynthia Mbamalu (Project Director) and Safiya Bichi (Pre-Election Observer), explained how the body conducts its activities and how it will conduct such for the Ekiti July 14 governorship election.

    Isah, pointed out that it is necessary for the group to remain in Ekiti till July to ensure proper engagement with the media on its activities before, during and after the governorship poll.

    He said the project’s objectives is to help promote free, fair, peaceful, credible and legitimate elections that are conducted in accordance with international and regional standards, as well as the constitution and the electoral code of the country.

  • Menace of election rigging in Nigeria

    Elections are a central feature of democracy. For election to be free and fair, it must express the will of the electorate. It is said, free elections don’t always result in fair election. In Nigeria today, election rigging has become an easy way to electoral victory. Our politicians, INEC officials and security agents sell our votes to the highest bidder not minding if the person is capable or not.

    2019 election is by the corner, politicians are strategizing to win elections. Some are involved in all manner of evil sacrifices for ritual purposes. It is during this period that people go missing and a lot of other atrocities are committed. What do we expect from leaders who commit all these atrocities to get to power? Of course no good can come out of such politicians.

    It is on record that the only free and fair election we ever had was in 1993 when Chief MKO Abiola won the election but was never given the mandate to rule. He later died in the struggle. Our politicians are thirsty for power and will do just anything to remain in power. Jumping from Governorship seat to the Senate and House of Representatives. They are bunch of lazy old men who keep recycling themselves and feeding on free oil money not minding the hardship they inflict on the citizenry. They deny the youths the chances to explore their God given talents but keep telling them they are the leaders of tomorrow. The question here is when will this tomorrow come?

    Politicians see rigging as the only means of winning election and this is not healthy for a developing nation. I implore the electorate to rise up and defend their votes.

    Thus, the youths who are the engine room of the nation should get involved in the election activities. We need good leaders who would judiciously and prudently use our resources for the common good of the citizenry.

    • By Josephine Ada Ogboso

    Department of Mass Communication

    Bayero University, Kano.

     

  • ‘I’m not afraid of election’

    The President of Nigeria Basketball Federation (NBBF) Engineer Ahmadu-Musa Kida has boasted that he would be ready for re-election whenever the International Basketball Federation (FIBA) chooses to do so.

    He told reporters in Abuja yesterday that at the last visit of FIBA’s delegation when they advised both warring sides Kida and Tijani Umar factions to reconcile but to no avail, he said he would abide with any final decision coming from the world governing body of basketball- FIBA which may see FIBA conducting a fresh election for the NBBF.

    But Kida was quick to note that before any election is conducted, the Federation has to draft a Constitution that will be endorsed by the Federal Government of Nigeria and most importantly FIBA. Kida, however, disclosed that the NBBF has no valid Constitution guiding the Federation now and a fresh constitution should be in place before the election.

    “I won the election overwhelmingly so I am not scared at all of any election. We know that election would hold every three years. So if we are not afraid of an election last year, we can’t be afraid of any coming one”, Kida disclosed.

  • Update: Oyo LG Polls: APC wins 65 councils, 610 wards

    The candidates of the ruling All Progressive Congress have been declared the winners of the 610 wards, 33 local governments and 35 local council development areas elections held  last Saturday in the state.

     

    The announcement of the results which started at about 2pm Sunday did not end with the final local government was announced at about 8: 10 pm.

     

    Baring last minute changes, the newly elected council chairmen and councillors will be sworn in on Monday at the House of Chiefs, Parliamentary Building, House of Assembly Complex, Agodi Secretariat, Ibadan.

    The election was conducted in the 33 LGAs, 33 LCDAs, 610 wards and 4, 783 polling units across the state where 12 political parties participated.

     

    Chairman of OYSIEC, Mr. Jide Ajeigbe who declared the party the eventual winner appreciated the good people of the state for conducting themselves orderly and peacefully throughout the period of the exercise.

     

    He said “kudos need to be given to contestants for organising a violent-free electioneering campaign. Your conducts have been shown the kind of political maturity that Oyo state is known for.

     

    “It is, therefore, hoped that this kind of political maturity exhibited before and during the conduct of the election will be sustained now that the election is over so that good democratic values be further achieved at the grassroots.”

     

    Addressing the press after the final announcement of the result, spokesperson of the team of independent observers, Comrade Friday Maduka commended all the stakeholders including the government, the electoral umpire, the political parties, the security operative and the electorate for working together to achieve a successful election.

     

    He noted that, although the team observed high turnout of electorate in urban areas, he said same could not be said of the electorate in the rural areas.

     

    He particularly commended the electoral umpire for providing a level playing ground for all the political parties to participate in the election, the Oyo state government for considering it necessary to conduct LG Polls and providing the conducive environment for the participants to participate in the election.

  • Court adjourns hearing in PDP suit on election

    Justice Nathaniel Ayo-Emmanuel of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, yesterday adjourned till May 15, the suit on May 12 Oyo State council election.

    The parties are the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP); Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC); Oyo State Independent Electoral Commission (OYSIEC), Governor Abiola Ajimobi and the House of Assembly.

    It was adjourned following absence of the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Oluseun Abimbola, who heads the defendant’s legal team.

    PDP took INEC, OYSIEC, Ajimobi and the House of Assembly to court on the proposed election.

    Director of Civil Litigation and Advisory Services Mr. S.O. Adeoye led other lawyers to defend the second, third and fourth defendants, while Dr. Nureni Adeniran led the party’s counsel team.

    When the case was mentioned, Adeoye told the court that the attorney-general was involved in the funeral of House of Assembly Speaker Mr. Michael Adeyemo.

    He said he had discussed with the plaintiff’s counsel on the possibility adjournment.

    The Unity Forum of All Progressives Congress has condemned the state government and Oyo State Independent Electoral Commission (OYSIEC) over a statement credited to the commission that no judgement can stop the coming election.

    A statement yesterday in Ibadan by the Secretary of the forum, Dr. Wasiu Olatunbosun, said the statement was not only unfounded, but also reckless.

    On Wednesday, A Federal High Court in Ibadan ordered OYSIEC to suspend the planned local government election pending the determination of a substantive suit.

    But in its statement after the judgement, OYSIEC said: “Section 9 CAP 154 of the State Independent Electoral Commission Law, Laws of Oyo State 2000 states:

    ‘1. No interim, interlocutory or any other order, decision or judgment by any court or tribunal before or after the commencement of this Law in respect of any intra-party dispute or any other proceedings or matter pertaining to an election under this law shall affect the timing of an election under this Law.

    ‘2 No person or authority shall be liable to prosecution, contempt charge, sanction or penalty by reason only that he conducted an election on the day or time appointed by the electoral commission for the election.”‘

    Reacting, Olatunbosun warned Ajeigbe, the chairman OYSIEC, of the consequences of his actions or inactions, which could be tantamount to undermining the authority of the judiciary, which in itself is contemptuous.

    He affirmed that there was no place in logical or legal reasoning that placed state laws over the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    “This provision is contrary to Section 5 of the constitution, which gave adjudicatory powers to the court. Any provision, which tends to oust the power of the court, especially state law, which is inferior to the constitution, the ground norm, shall to the extent of its inconsistency, be null and void, and is of no effect. This is trite.”

    The Ajimobi administration twice postponed the election due to court injunctions.

    “Why is the government now trying to ignore the court order? This will be tantamount to speaking from both sides of the mouth.”

    The forum urged well-meaning people to disregard the threat, as legal means would be pursued to bring sanity to the system.

    “All hands must be on deck to stop political rascality and impunity in the state,” Olatunbosun concluded.

  • A case for devolution before election

    In a democracy, periodic elections serve several purposes. First, elections ensure that citizens grant their consent to be governed. Second, elections afford individuals the opportunity to choose their candidates for office based on promises made. Third, election is a referendum on the performance of incumbents and on their fidelity to their promises. Therefore, voters must ask, and candidates and political parties must answer, a fundamental question: How faithful have you been to your promises to us?

    While electorates have ample time to ponder who to vote for in the forthcoming elections, political parties and candidates, especially those to whom voters gave their mandate four years ago, must race against time to deliver on their promises.

    Voters can easily evaluate and rate party and candidate performance in the light of the promises contained in their election manifestos. And for political parties and candidates that are still performance-oriented, all they need is remind themselves of where they are in the fulfillment of their promises. The party in power at the center has the most challenging responsibility in this regard. What did it promise and what has it achieved?

    All Progressives Congress (APC) promised heaven on earth. However, many voters knew that it cannot fulfill many of its promises, especially on the economy in four years because of the reality of our economy and its dependence on one product. Surely, much more could have been done if the administration had fully engaged in the first few months of its inauguration.

    Voters also knew that Nigerian corruption is hydra-headed, and it would fiercely resist even the most virulent attack, talk less of a half-hearted one that appears to be sabotaged at every turn from inside. Therefore, even with Mr. Integrity at the head of the battle, corruption has demonstrated remarkable resilience.

    In the matter of security, it has been a case of two steps forward one step backward. Like corruption, despite some great strides in the war against Boko Haram, the terrorists have persisted. Dapchi was a rude shock that the administration and the party had no device to absorb. With the herdsmen-farmer clashes that have left scores dead, a high score on security is a lost hope.

    So, there are failings, some of which are forgivable because of the reality on the ground at the inception of the administration, and others because it is well understood that both party and candidate meant well but were overwhelmed by the challenges that welcomed them to office.

    However, there is a promise whose fulfillment voters unequivocally expected and the breaking of which they will not forgive. This is because, unlike other promises, voters believe that this one is within the power of the new administration and the ruling party. It is also a promise that the party and candidate voluntarily made without duress.

    Prominent on the list of actionable promises highlighted on the website of APC is devolution of power from the center to the states. The party will immediately upon taking power move to amend the constitution to devolve power to states. This was the closest it acceded to the demand for restructuring, a vocal demand of many sections of the country before and during the election of 2015.

    Several months after taking over power, the party set up a restructuring committee. The committee made some recommendations which were applauded by many stakeholders as a first step. APC leadership promised to share the recommendations with the administration and to have a buy-in from Nigerians. Many citizens looked forward to progress on the matter. They have patiently waited for some months and are now wondering if the party and the government intend to deliver.

     

    APC has no good reason to renege on its promise of devolution. The party has control of both the executive and legislative branches at the center. It also controls at least 24 states of the federation the legislative branches of which will be involved in the constitutional amendment legislation. Furthermore, many legislative chambers outside the control of APC are expected to support the amendment. The question is whether the party itself and its leadership are genuinely in favor of devolution in particular and restructuring in general.

    This last point goes to the heart of the problem. Is APC as a party committed to the fulfillment of its promise to devolve power from the center to states? Does the leadership of APC favor a balanced federation that serves the interests of all? Or is the party leadership only paying lip service to devolution as a vote-getting gimmick?

    In 2014, when, after five years in power, the Jonathan administration succumbed to political pressure and organized the National Conference on Restructuring, many of us were genuinely skeptical of the belated move. We thought it was a ruse. APC was at the forefront of the skepticism, deciding not to participate. Then, in its manifesto for the 2015 general election, the party made restructuring central to its platform with a promise to begin the process of constitutional amendment as soon as it took over power. That promise galvanized the electorate, especially in the southwest.

    Three years on, a committee of the party submitted a report recommending devolution. I assume that there have been behind-the-scene debates and deliberations on what to do with the recommendations. The party and its leadership must now know that they cannot continue to take the electorate for granted in this matter. The word of the party must be its bond and must be the basis for the electorates’ decision to support or withdraw support at the next election.

    If the APC and President Buhari want the support of electorates across the country, they should conduct a polling to determine what are the priorities of electorates from different zones. For the South in general and the Southwest in particular, and, to a large extent, the Middle Belt, we know that restructuring is the foremost concern of the public, from the privileged to the wretched.

    But beside what their priorities are, the electorate have a right to hold political parties and their candidates to account and to demand they promote justice. While there are various ways of understanding justice, I find Thomas Hobbes’ definition especially attractive for my purpose. For him, justice is keeping a promise voluntarily made. Conversely, to be unjust is to break a promise voluntarily made. No electorate coerced APC into the promise of constitutional amendment for devolution of power. Though, it is far less than the restructuring that citizens have clamored for in the last thirty years; devolution is what the party promised and why people voted for it. it must deliver on that promise to have any credibility to ask for their vote again. It is simple commonsense.

    Now I anticipate a response. We made other promises beside devolution: to fight corruption, to defeat terrorism, to revive and reform the economy, and we have made progress in the fulfillment of those promises. But while progress is being made on these promises, and while voters understand and appreciate the constraints on the path of government, it is hard for them to understand why the one promise which should be the easiest to fulfill has been left hanging for three years. Indeed, for many citizens, if the government and the party had chosen to make restructuring its priority three years ago, perhaps, they would have made better progress in the furtherance of other priorities.

    For President Buhari and APC, the sun is still up with sufficient drying power if they have the political will to fulfill their promise to devolve power. Otherwise, any new promise by the party will be a hard sell in the south. What might be the promise this time? It cannot be “Change” because that would play into the hand of the opposition. And if it is “Sustaining Change”, the party must be able to itemize the changes that it has succeeded in making which need to be sustained. If it cannot point to devolution as the fundamental change that needs to be sustained, I do not know what might be its raison d’etre.

     

    • Follow me on Twitter:

    @SegunGbadeg2002

    @HarvestDayPubs