Tag: elections

  • Elections, leaders and democracy

    Kenya’s rescheduled  elections this week  and Nigeria’s  political parties sparring for the 2019  elections capture our attention today  in the  way democracy and the rule of law is being applied in both nations. We  look at that along side the new revelation in the US media  that the Democratic Party leadership in  the US  was aware  that one of its agents was funded  during  the campaign  to gather information that was damaging and could be used against Republican candidate Donald  Trump who eventually won   the 2016 US  presidential  elections.

    Let  me state  clearly  that  I strongly  believe  that democracy  should  be based on the  rule of law  and no matter how  I berate  that lack in its practice   nowadays, I  see  no alternative to democracy in governance and the organization of any political  system  whose  objective is the peace,  prosperity  and progress  of its electorate or polity. I  say  this so  as not to be mistaken for  an anarchist  given  the strident  tone  with which   I have  in recent times berated  constantly  the  practice  of democracy globally  in general and  Nigeria in particular. I offer  no apologies  for this approach since democracy to me is work in progress socially  and politically  and  in such situations , the best  is always yet  to come.  The best example  of this  is Spain and the  Catalonia  Independence debacle  unfolding before our ours as the best  test of  the application of the Spanish  constitution Article  55  which   has never  been used  before  and which is now to be  invoked  to arrest secession constitutionally  as enshrined  in the Spanish  constitution that Spain is indissoluble. That  to me is the rule of law under stress or  even  duress, but very  much at play. That  to me is democracy  so  much  at work as work in progress in a positive direction of the rule of law.

    It  is in this context  therefore  that we look  at  Kenya’s  postponed  election deriving from the cancellation of the last elections this year  by the nation’s Supreme  Court. That  election   was won by incumbent  President Uhuru  Kenyatta  who  defeated Raila  Odinga,  who  has now decided not to participate in this week end’s election because  to  him   the electoral reforms that  marred the last  elections have not been  corrected and the anormalies  that led to the Supreme  Court cancellation  are  bound to repeat  themselves  in the new elections this week. Of  course the incumbent president disagrees and  has asked Kenyans  to turn  out  en mass  to  vote,  as  their  leaders  fought  for democracy  and they should  not lose their  right  to vote. However  aside  from their differing attitude on the electoral  climate and environment in  Kenya ,  the  pedigree   and  ancestry  of these two leaders   are  required  here  to shed light  on the fact  that since Kenya became a multi party  state  in 1991  elections in  that  nation  have been marred  by rigging , and violence.

    The  2002  and 2007 elections provided crucial  land marks in the nature of  Kenya’s  elections. The 2002 elections saw  to a  change of  government from  Arap  Moi  who picked Jomo  Kenyatta’s son  Uhuru  to succeed  him.  But  a deal  had been  made between  Raila Odinga  whose  father  was Jomo  Kenyatta’s  Vice  President but who could not succeed  Kenyatta  because he was a communist  and the Cold  War  was on and he had  to be supplanted by Arap  Moi  whose  regime was so  corrupt that the saying was popular in Kenya  in his time that -why  hire  a lawyer  if you  can pay  a judge.

    In  2002  therefore  the opposition agreed to have not  a strong  president but  a weak  one to  defeat  Moi and it was agreed that Kibaki  would be president and Raila Odinga PM. But  Kibaki had an accident during campaign and that left Raila to be doing most of the campaign.  Yet  when  Kibaki won  he reneged on this  arrangement which  however  came to pass in the aftermath of the post elections violence at the next elections in 2007  when  the   impasse  was resolved with Kibaki  becoming President and Raila Odinga who really won the 2007 elections becoming PM. Now  Raila Odinga believed  he won  this 2017    presidential   elections that the Kenyan  Electoral  Commission gave to incumbent President Uhuru  Kenyatta  and Odinga  has refused to contest this week end’s new elections and that has put Kenya’s  electoral  fate and political stability  on tenterhooks. Especially  as it is evident that Odinga’s  supporters  will not support the new results  and Kenya’s politics  will  return  to the usual  post  election violence and the rule of law  will take a break in that  polity.  How long that  would  take for peace to return  is anybody’s guess  for now.  Surely t is a sad  day  for democracy  and the rule of law in  Kenya for now.

    In  Nigeria,  however  it  is  pre- presidential  election jitters  that confront the past and present political  parties  in power. The opposition  PDP  which  lost power  in 2015  is positioning itself  for  clinching power back  in 2019  by  discrediting the selling point of the present APC  Administration which  is the war against corruption. The  PDP anti APC  drive  is being led  by the PDP governor of Ekiti State Ayo  Fayose. The  latest missile hurled  at The APC  now is the return of the Pension boss who fled Nigeria after embezzling huge pension  funds  but  who has now returned  purportedly on reinstatement to his job  with payment of 22m naira arrears  to the indignation of the Nigerian  public.

     

    • Continued online
  • ‘$6b spent on elections between 1999 and 2015’

    University lecturer from the  Obafemi Awolowo University, Ife, Dr.  Dare Ayeni yesterday said about $6 billion has been spent on elections between 1999 to 2015.

    He made this known at a training on promoting citizens’ participation in the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) organised by Alliance for Credible Election (ACE) in Abuja.

    He also challenged civil society organisations  to hold government accountable, adding that civil society groups are part of strong institutions.

    He lamented situations where civil society members, who are supposed to checkmate government, struggle for political appointment, adding that, that is the reason why many people don’t take them serious.

    Ayeni, who pointed out that conflict has been the bane of implementation in this part of the world, added that “when politicians don’t do what they are supposed to do, we expose them.”

    He lamented the kind of politics being played in the country, adding that before one can obtain, he needs the backing of political godfathers.

  • Ajomale: we’ll win elections for Ambode, Tinubu

    •Governor begs aggrieved party members

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) will sweep Saturday’s local government election, its Lagos State Chairman, Chief Henry Ajomale, has said.

    Ajomale said on Tuesday night that the party’s victory at the polls would be a befitting gift to Governor Akinwunmi Ambode and its National leader, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    During the presentation of flags to the chairman and vice chairmanship candidates, at the Banquet Hall of Lagos House, Ajomale said the party had worked hard in the last few months to ensure victory for its candidates.

    He said it was imperative for the party to maintain its grip so as to complement the governor’s efforts to deliver more dividends of democracy to every part of the state.

    “Nothing is going to stop us. By the grace of God we are going to win the elections. Come Saturday, get ready and use your available opportunities and your leadership role to win for our candidates and we know, for the governor and Asiwaju Bola Tinubu our leader, we must win the election as a gift to both of them.

    “I said it before, we are going to give the governor the whole package, the total package, all the councillors, all the chairmen are going to be handed over to the governor,” Ajomale said.

    Ambode appealed to aggrieved party members to bury the hatchet, noting that any crack would be detrimental to the progress of not just the party but the state in general.

    He said: “All the things that we have done wrong, I want to say sorry, and I want to appeal to all members of the party. If we break the house, there would be no further canopy. So it’s better to call the plumber, the bricklayer, the electrician to come and do repair works, so that there would be somewhere for us to lie our head and sleep.

    “I know there have been a lot of misgivings that have taken place, but what is important is for us to build the house together, thereafter we can do aesthetics to the windows and the doors so that those who are standing would be able to sit.

    “This is like a gathering of peaceful co-existence. Wherever it is that we have had cracks, there are still more than a 1001 positions to compensate and also placate them that left in a negative way,” the Governor said.

    He urged the candidates to go all out and ensure total victory for the party, saying that would ensure the giant strides geared towards moving the state forward remains on course in the years ahead.

    “It is better to cement the next four years through these Chairmen and also complement the efforts of the next two years so that we can get another six years. So if we decide because of disagreement or misunderstanding to destroy just two years out of eight years, there would be nothing left to show for the efforts.

    “A win for the party in all the elective positions would also sustain the virtues which Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu stands for. This course is a course for the Asiwaju dynasty. So we stand up today to say that we are here to defend that dynasty in totality.”

  • Terrorism, elections and treason

    GREAT events happened globally this week and as a perpetual student of history I am quite excited. In a week that celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the Middle East Six days war of 1967 between Arabs and Israel, and the Allies’ Normandy Invasion of June 6 1944 that finished Hitler’s vast and powerful Germany’s Third Reich in the Second World War, equally mind bogging and highly potentially historical moments and events happened this last week.

    It is my goal today to make a meal of them , as the saying goes, but really without any exaggeration, I ask you to come along and enjoy or shrug off my analysis and perceptions on them, as you deem fit. First in the UK , an election called from a perceived position of strength by incumbent PM Theresa May was ‘high jacked’ by terrorism and has resulted in a hung Parliament instead of a renewed mandate for‘ strong leadership and stability’. In the Middle East nine leading Arab States, unbelievably, but ostensibly at the prompting and behest of a domestically battered and media – hunted US president, for once stood against global terrorism and ostracised one of them, Qatar, by disengaging with it and its citizens, on land, sea and air.

    Thirdly, in the US, and before a stunned US Senate Committee , a fired FBI spy master admitted that he retaliated against his boss, the newly elected US president who sacked him, by giving confidential state information to the news media and most of the powerful US media saw nothing immoral or treasonable in that . Fourthly in Nigeria some Northern youths asked Igbos to vacate the North within three months claiming darkly that the two governors from the North calling them to order had ‘disengaged from reality ‘ because of their ambition to become the Vice President in the event of the death of our ailing president.

    Fifthly the Acting President of Nigeria mid week visited Maiduguri in Borno State where three female Boko Haram suicide bombers killed 18 people and wounded 24 others in multiple suicide bombings. This then is our menu list for today. I proceed now to dilate and give my perceptions on each of these events and happenings in the last one week. Firstly, the fact that UK PM May did not win the mandate she asked for in going to the polls this June 8 should not come as a surprise. This is because, fate, timing, and terrorism took the matter of the campaign and election completely out of her hands, and consequently her political control. I never went along with those pundits who had said rather laconically and ominously that – it is time for May to go in June – because I believe that she deserved a better electoral fate than that wished her by her adversaries, especially the Labor Party.

    This is because her electoral slogan of strong leadership and stability is precisely what Britain needs at this point in time. Unfortunately the opposite has happened with the election results and the British people have become divided, unstable and leaderless henceforth by rejecting May’s slogan and that really is their funeral. The timing of the election too, so soon after the Brexit referendum hiatus and its reality, made the election itself a well placed scapegoat for a suddenly awakened, party – blind electorate, eager to settle scores with the British political class for the uncertainty and fear of their future unleashed by the Brexit Referendum results. Also terrorism made the June 8 election a charade in terms of security. The reasonable thing would have been to postpone the election because of the bestiality of three terror attacks in three months.

    Two on Westminster and London Bridges with car crushing and knives and one, more deadly with suicide bombing in Manchester. But Leadership Hypocrisy, the peculiar British one that says they must stay ‘united and strong’ in the face of terror, prevailed . Even though May tried at the last minute albeit too late for positive effect, said the truth and admitted that Britain had been too tolerant of extremism and after another concert had been organized by the singer at whose concert over 20 innocent people had been killed in Manchester, barely two weeks ago.

    Any nation that organizes elections in the midst of terrorism is fooling itself on security as has been proven in Pakistan, Iraq, and Syria – nations to which radicalized British youths flee to learn terror and its application from the Madrasas of Pakistan and the Middle East and terror spitting Imams. They then return home to London and Manchester to unleash horror on the unsuspecting British public, ever so trusting of their Police, under whose nose and radar reported cases of violent suspects have been ignored repeatedly as investigations of the three election- timed acts of terrorism in the last three weeks have shown. Undoubtedly, with a hung Parliament, and the new Minority government of Theresa May the UK is in for the worst of times in its war against terrorism. But it is one it must win only by separating its core values from Islam which the Mayor of London said ‘is compatible with British values’.

    Which unfortunately was an observation which several British politicians dared not contest at election time, in the face of rampant and real terrorism and the quest for power. I presume this proverbial ostrich with its head buried in the sand type of British leadership hypocrisy is the main weapon that the opposition Labour Party will use to heckle and harass Theresa May’s new government as she tries to implement her late election campaign promise that the UK has been too tolerant of extremism. Moreso in a British environment that has been laid prostrate by misplaced multiculturalism which in turn has made security a real and expected nightmare to be appeased rather than confronted.

    This really is the problem and the challenge for Theresa May’s new Minority government and the Hung Parliament fostered by terrorism and Multiculturalism on June 8. Secondly, and again, the fact that major Arab states like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Kuwait and the oil rich Gulf States like Bahrain, the UAE, Yemen and others have severed their relations and those of their citizens with Qatar is a direct consequence of the Middle East foreign policy of the beleaguered Trump Administration, following so closely on his recent visit to the Middle East, Israel, and the G7 meeting in Europe . During the visit, in an address to leaders of 50 Muslim majority nations in Saudi Arabia, the new US president urged them to drive away Muslim extremists in their midst as they cannot wait for the world at large to do it for them.

    Trump shouted loud and clear – drive them from your communities, drive them from the earth! It is obvious that the call is like a call to sanity or prayers to Arab leaders and nations and that is why they have identified oil rich Qatar with its famous capital of Doha as the first culprit to be identified and punished for supporting Islamic terrorism typified by the bloody Islamic state and Boko Haram. That is vintage productive diplomacy and the US president deserves kudos for waking up a sleeping giant that is well positioned to fight global terrorism from within and without, and stemming the tide of radicalization that has brought the world to its knees in terms of brutal murders and killings in the name of religion from Paris to London and Maiduguri.

    We recall that when former President George Bush addressed the US Congress on 9/11 in September 2001 and launched the war on terror he said – Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice to our enemies justice will be done. In 2003 he launched the invasion of Iraq which in retrospect was the catalyst for the rise of Islamic state or ISIS, aided and abetted by eight years of the luke warm, pacifist and sermonizing without action, of the Obama Administration. Ironically barely two weeks after the visit of a new US president and his call on Arab leaders in a diplomatic shuttle the Arab world has broken ranks and banished one of them for supporting global terrorism.

    That is a very unexpected volte face for the Arab world which had been luke warm hitherto, like the last US president in taking the bull by the horn in confronting global terrorism. Next we take on the issue of the testimony of the sacked FBI boss in the US who admitted that he gave information to the New York Times because he felt defamed by the reasons given for his sack by the US President Donald Trump.

    That to me is a betrayal of faith and misuse of discretion on state matters unbecoming of the head of any intelligence outfit especially that of the US. No wonder a senator bellowed rather contemptuously during the hearing that the only thing that has not been leaked so far was that the US president is under investigation denied by Comley but already in the public domain. In any other part of Europe or indeed the civilized world this former US FBI boss will be charged for treason. Yet the US media has already overlooked this criminal act and is still awaiting the impeachment of the US president over collusion with Russia to win his 2016 presidential election. Which to me is such a pathetic approach to presidential politics that is quite new to the ethics of democracy in the transparent and accountability world of today’s global democracy.

    Lastly, the call of the Arewa Youths for the Igbos to leave the North is disruptive and treasonable. Just as the Biafra MASSOB call and intransigence, years after the civil war. Equally troublesome and anarchic was the support given the youths’ call for Igbos to leave by a spokesman of the Northern Elders Forum, Professor Ango Abdullahi . Both the Arewa Youths and the Elders Forum should put heads together and unite to defeat Boko Haram which killed 18 people and wounded 24 others in the North East last Wednesday even as the Acting President Professor Yemi Osinbajo was on a visit to distribute grains to IDPs in Maiduguri and its environs.

    The dead in Maiduguri and its environments killed by suicide bombers, who are Boko Haram girls, are full blooded Nigerians and driving Igbos away from the North will not solve the problem. Blackmailing the two governors of Borno and Kaduna with legitimate but undeclared political ambition is childish and distasteful when all they are doing is protecting Nigerians within their state. Both Northern Elders and youths should know that the era of ‘born to rule is over‘ and that Nigeria belongs to all Nigerians who obey its laws and not only to those who make a mockery of such laws, as if they are above them. A word is enough for the wise. Once again long live the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

  • Lagos Council polls: 73 candidates emerge at NCP primary

    The National Conscience Party (NCP) on Saturday conducted its primary election which saw 73 candidates emerging for the July 22 council polls.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the candidates emerged through consensus, after party members present endorsed their candidature by voice votes.

    The primary, which produced candidates who would be contesting in 20 Local Government Areas and 10 Local Development Areas, was monitored by an official of the Lagos State Independent Electoral Commission (LASIEC), Mr Kola Shittu.

    Some of the chairmanship candidates are Lookman Mustapha (Agege), Biodun Oyeyemi (Orile Agege), Bosah Emeka (Ajeromi Ifelodun), Monday Samuel (Alimosho) and Fatai Ibuowo, who is state chairman of the party, (Oshodi/Isolo).

    The councillorship candidates that emerged include Fasugba Lukman (Orile Agege), Ishola Musbau (Lagos Mainland), and Olapade George (Oshodi /Isolo).

    Speaking at the primary, Ibu Owo commended the party members for the peaceful manner the election was conducted.

    He congratulated the candidates on their victory and urged them to quickly reach out to the electorate to ensure a good outing for the party.

    The chairman said the party had the ultimate agenda to control the state government and urged candidates to use the council polls as a launch pad to realise the agenda.

    Ibu-Owo said the party initially intended to contest in all the 20 LGAs and 37 LCDAs but the administrative fees charged by LASEIC discouraged some party members in some areas.

    “However, thank God that we are still able to have candidates for 30 council areas despite the illegal fees to sideline us.

    “We have already taken LASIEC to court on the matter and we are sure of justice.

    “We are not going to take anything other than outright cancellation of the fees,’’ he said.

    Ibu-Owo described the decision of most political parties in the state to agree with LASIEC on the downward review of the fees as shocking, saying it amounted to compromise.

    He said his party would do everything possible to ensure the election was free and fair.

    NAN reports that LASIEC has fixed July 22 for the election and July 29 for run-off. (NAN)

  • Towards hitch-free elections in 2019

    Towards hitch-free elections in 2019

    Politicians, civil society groups, electoral officers and other stakeholders have met in Lagos to assess the security challenges facing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in the discharge of its duties, as it begins preparations for the 2019 general elections. MUSA ODOSHIMOKHE, who attended the event, reports that the positions canvassed by the various interest groups raised some pertinent issues.

    A CIVIL society organisation, the Independent Service Delivery Monitoring Group (ISDMG), recently assembled stakeholders in Lagos, to assess the challenges facing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), as it prepares for the next general elections scheduled for 2019.

    At the meeting, which took place in Lagos, representatives of INEC, the political class, the media and the academia raised some issues that could constitute a stumbling block to the election, if not addressed on time. The issues revolve round security challenges that may rear its ugly head before, during and after the contest.

    The Acting Executive Director of ISDMG, Faith Nwadishi, said his organisation decided to do a research when it realised that most of the elections after 2015 were becoming inconclusive.

    He said: “We tried to find out the reasons behind the inconclusive elections. We found that it was courageous on the part of the INEC chairman to declare some of the elections inconclusive. Now politicians are beginning to get together for the 2019 elections.  So, civil society organisations must be proactive; look at what is needed to be done; review the elections which had been conducted so far.”

    Stakeholders surmised that even though INEC had the legitimacy to conduct elections, it is handicapped when it comes to security and it is not in a position to guarantee the safe conduct of elections. It was established that police officers sent to provide security during elections were not well remunerated; a situation which had led many of them to compromise during such exercises in the past.

    The stakeholders cited examples where police officers and other security organisations deployed to cover election abandoned their place of primary assignment, to partake in the sharing of money, food and drinks provided by politicians. In such a situation, the security officers turned blind eyes to their benefactors’ malfeasance. They called on government to checkmate such fraudulent practices, by ensuring that allowances meant for officers on such national assignment are provided before the day of elections.

    They equally resolved that political parties should not be deregistered. The idea is to allow both major and minor political parties to contest; just like it is done in other advanced democracy.

    They insist that if weaker political parties are removed from the political space, the democratic experiment would become disenchanting. In that case, the rights of the people to freely associate would be abridged.

    If that becomes the norms, they argue, many people would be disentranced. In that eventuality, those who fought so hard to bring back democracy in the country would emerge the losers, because they do not have sufficient funds to transform their parties into the kind of parties INEC craves for.

    Speaking on the fate of fringe parties, one of the brains behind ISDMG, Mr. Babatunde Oluajo, said it is not INEC’s responsibility to canvass for the removal of paper-weight parties from the political space; rather it should concentrate on the conduct of elections.

    He said: “I am really agitated each time INEC embarks on deregistering weak political parties. If that is carried out, they would have disenfranchised Nigerians who are supporters of those parties. What the commissioner should be seen to be doing is to conduct elections. In case, those smaller political parties cannot field candidates for the national elections that would warrant them to be on the ballot papers, they should be accorded the rights to be on the ballot papers at the local elections where they field candidates.

    “We are aware of the efforts of the likes of the late Gani Fawehinmi, who fought so hard to enthrone democracy. Now you are suggesting that his party be deregistered, with the kind of large followership it has? I think that is not politically wise.”

    INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, who was represented by the Commissioner in-charge of Election and Party Monitoring, Mrs. Anthonia Simbine, called for support for the electoral body.

    Simbine enumerated the challenges starring INEC in the face, but explained that they were surmountable. She said the commission would incorporate all that is needed to ensure that the e-voting exercise becomes a success.

    She said the attitude of the political class, its desperation for power and the do-or-die politics played have not helped the commission in the conduct of elections. She said some of the politicians could go to any length to ensure they emerged winners and that attempts to stand on their way were often fiercely resisted.

    Simbine pointed out that INEC was equally constrained by delay in remitting its fund, adding that when such situation arises, it becomes very cumbersome to conduct elections. She said the real elections and by-elections attract the same financial commitment by the commission. She added that it was erroneous to state that INEC spends less in conducting by-elections.

    She added: “Elections and election period are usually very tough times. We have all sorts of political behavours that can be very negative and we all depend on the security agencies to help us provide conducive atmosphere in order to be able to carry out the exercise.

    “The collaboration has been good; if not for the contribution of the security agencies it would have been very difficult. There can be challenges once in a while; we always work towards improving on the process.”

    The commissioner said the conflicting court judgments and orders from the judiciary have not helped matters; because they often result in uncertainty in the electoral process. She said: “We have seen a situation where orders on the same subject matter or lower court not abiding by the decision of superior court and in some cases of the Supreme Court.

    “Although, INEC is now on the first line charge, the delay in passing the budget and envelope system being implemented in the face of recession and the conflicting states’ primaries, as well as the volatile foreign exchange market have negative impacts on the work of the commission.”

    The INEC official expressed confidence that the commission would live up to its responsibility, when the e-voting is put to use. She urged the electorate to show maximum support and cooperation during the exercise. Her words: “We expect to get maximum cooperation from the House of Representatives, just like the Senate has already approved it and we look forward to implementing it, when it eventually becomes law. The e-voting means people will now be in their home and go online to vote. We will distribute technologies wherever it is possible and where it will be conducive for the electorate cast their votes.”

    In spite of the above optimism, other stakeholders are not confident that the country is ripe for the innovation. For instance, the chairman of the Lagos State chapter of the Labour Party, Pastor Biodun Popoola, does not share the INEC commissioner’s optimism. He believes that the country is not ripe for e-voting.

    His words:  “The e-voting idea could be a necessary machinery to forestall the re-enactment of the past practice of clouded, shady and dangerous arrangement by INEC for elections in Nigeria which to a larger extent have allowed kingpins and undemocratic thugs to hijack what necessarily should be a free, fair and transparent arrangement.

    “I strongly believe that our country and by extension the citizenry is not in the ‘A’ rating for this fast receding global trend, which allows voters to transmit their secure and secret ballot during election through the internet. In truth, a more robust and well-designed system with options will facilitate the conduct of the exercise with more speed and less cost.

    “But, despite all the advantages stated, there are several issues that definitely stand in the way of the success of this unique arrangement, particularly in our dearly beloved nation, Nigeria such as the percentage of literacy, unequal access to internet, unequal access to technological devices and mobile applications, vulnerability to security issues such as server/data base virus and network issues which as at date is upside down.”

    Fine-tuning the electoral process has become a serious concern for stakeholders, who believe that the commission must get its acts together before the 2019 general elections. Some of them are of the view that INEC must do everything possible to redeem its image; so that it could be depended upon when integrity matters.

    Chairman of the occasion and former President of the Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People (MOSOP), Mr. Ledun Mitee, charged the commission to put its adhoc staff up-to-date before conducting the elections. He said INEC has the responsibility to discourage the people from embarking on dubious electoral path. He said, in the past, INEC’s adhoc staff were often willing tools in the hands of corrupt politicians.

    He said: “What I see as a challenge is how we can make 2019 a success. I think the overriding force that should give INEC should not be about its staff that works in Abuja or state offices. This is because the local people see INEC not through the prism of these people, but through their adhoc staff who actually work on the field during elections.

    “So, when you say there can be compromise by those presiding officers, the adhoc staff is the ones people see as INEC. I think it is how to leverage these people, to meet the standard that builds confidence on the populace. That is what INEC should work towards.”

    Mitee said the recently approved guidelines on the conduct of elections were rolled out against the background of some INEC staff that misbehaved during elections, adding that no punishment was meted out to the politicians involved in the misconduct.

    So far, observers say INEC under the leadership of Prof. Yakubu has organised 157 elections between November 2015 and now and 123 out of it was concluded on first ballot.

    For some stakeholders, the commission needs to do more to earn public accolade. But, Nwadichi said ISDMG is conversant with such challenges and that Nigerians should be patient, “because we have studied the electoral system of some advanced countries and some of them are not even relying on e-voting anymore”.

    She added: “I think the integrity of any electoral process depends on those managing the system, including the citizens themselves. While we welcome the idea of e-voting, we ask people to be a little patient, do more research about and look at why countries are beginning to leave it behind.”

  • Minister to INEC: make 2019 elections better

    Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Malam Muhammad Bello has said that the credibility of the 2015 General Election has enhanced the image of Nigeria to the outside world and therefore should be improved upon.

    Bello stated this while receiving the Presidential Committee on Constitution and Electoral Reform led by its chairman, Senator Ken Nnamani in his office.

    He said that the election was largely made credible, because of the use of biometrics and card readers by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    The Minister therefore urged the Committee to look into strengthening the use of Information & Communication Technology (ICT) in all subsequent elections in order to sustain the achievements.

    According to a statement issued by the Deputy Director/Chief Press Secretary, Muhammad Sule, the minister reiterated that the use of card reader in elections in Nigeria is a revolution that should be sustained, as it would go a long way in reducing the number of litigations after elections.

    He emphasised that Nigeria is ripe and Nigerians are now well educated and enlightened in the use of Information & Communication Technology (ICT) in elections considering how the populace make use of mobile telephone in addition to internet data mostly for new media (social media).

    The Minister assured that the FCT Administration will support the Committee in doing its work to ensure that the subsequent electoral processes are fair and credible, and seen to be so.

    Bello appreciated the contributions of Senator Ken Nnamani to the country when he was the Senate President; saying that history will remember him for the role he played to ensure that democracy is sustained.

    The Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Constitution and Electoral Reform, Senator Ken Nnamani commended the Minister for the effort of his Administration in completing abandoned projects across the 8,000 square kilometers of the Federal Capital Territory.

    He said that the Committee is in the FCT Administration to pay the Administration a visit as they were in Abuja to hold a National Public Hearing to collate more information from the residents before turning out an all-inclusive report to the government as well as bringing up relevant Bills for enactment by the National Assembly.

    The FCT Permanent Secretary, Dr. Babatope Ajakaiye and other top officials of the FCT Administration joined the Minister in receiving the team.

  • Senate okays e-voting, card reader for elections

    Senate okays e-voting, card reader for elections

    THE use of electronic voting (e-Voting) system, electronic transmission of election results and the deployment of Electronic Card Reader (ECR) were some of the amendments to the Electoral Act, 2010, passed by the Senate yesterday.

    With the amendments, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) will, beginning from 2019 general elections, electronically transmit election results to collation centers.

    The passage of the bill followed the consideration of the report of the Senate Committee on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on a Bill for an Act to amend the Electoral Act No. 6, 2010 and for other related matters (SB 231 and SB 234).

    The bill has provision for the use of e-Voting by INEC during future elections, use of ECR and INEC power to modify the voting process if there is a challenge.

    The Senate also approved a provision to enable INEC transmit the result of elections electronically in an encrypted and secured manner to prevent hacking.

    To address the incident that happened in Kogi State, during the last governorship election, the amended Electoral Act provides that if a candidate dies before results of elections are declared, the results will not only remain valid but belong to the political party that lost its candidate.

    It also added that in such a scenario, the INEC should suspend the elections for 21 days to allow the affected political party conduct fresh primaries to choose a new candidate.

    The Bill also gives political parties power to adopt direct or indirect primaries in choosing their flag bearers, while qualification or disqualification of candidates for elections will be solely based on the Constitution.

    In his comments after the adoption of the report, Senate President Bukola Saraki, thanked his colleagues for a job well done and expressed optimism that the Bill would further improve the nation’s electoral system and also contribute to good governance.

    Saraki said: “Distinguished colleagues, let me thank all of you for this job well done. I want to particularly thank the members of the Committee on INEC and particularly the former chairman of the Committee, Abubakar Kyari, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege and all the members of the committee who have worked very hard to ensure the passage of this very important bill which addresses our electoral process and goes on to strengthen our democracy.

    “We have touched on new areas which I believe will improve the credibility of our elections and by so doing, definitely improve our democracy and good governance.

    “Most importantly, I think, are some of the new sections we have added, in the area of technology, the smart card reader, and particularly the area of collation which has been an area of great concern.

    “Collation of results after the polling units and some of the additions we put on the electronic way by which the compilation of results can be done, I think will go a long way to reduce some of the irregularities we have seen before.

    “This is a great work you have been able to put together today and I want to commend everybody. I am also happy that we have passed the amendments very early. My concern has always been that if we don’t do it now, it will get more difficult as we get close to the 2019 elections.

    “We hope that with this Bill that we have passed, very soon, we will sit together with the House of Representatives to be able to get the copy to the President for assent.

    “I think when signed into law, it will enable INEC to have something to work early enough. I think what we have done today will really put our electoral law among the best that we have and it will go a long way in improving our electoral process,” Saraki said.

  • Federations’ elections

    Winning any medal at the Olympic Games takes eight years, according to sports science experts. It could be more, depending on the country’s sports policies and calendar. But for some exceptional athletes, it could be less. The pointer here is that winning at such big stages isn’t easy. It requires coordinated planning targeted at the grassroots. In sporting climes, they set out catchment areas to discover athletes when they are young, groom them and expose them to rural competitions before showcasing them to big events, such as the all Africa Games, the Commonwealth Games and the Olympics to challenge and perhaps shock the established stars. This is why countries like Jamaica and America are renowned for the sprints and indeed athletics. It is also the reason the East Africans rule the world in the long distance races.

    Winning laurels at big events is a project structured on workable models used by renowned sports polities. In fact, most of these models are anchored on sports institutes which train the coaches and sports managers. It also provides systems which are adopted by these countries’ teams during competitions. It is the reason we see certain countries play the same way with a few adjustment informed by how the opposition plays.

    Countries such as Australia, America, Britain and recently Jamaica have models which developing countries like ours can adopt, if we truly want to make the industry the business that it is in other climes. Our administrators made so much noise about adopting the Australia model after the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. They were particularly fascinated by the feats achieved by the Australians. Several visits were made to Sydney to study the system. Some Australians came here. Our administrators raised hopes that the National Sports Institute (NIS) will be redesigned with the Australian model in mind. It never happened, largely because of the policy sommersaults.

    After the Atlanta’96 Olympics, the battle for sports facilities took place – again without results. If we exploited the initial bilateral relationship with the Australians in 2000, the NIS would have been upgraded to a university, with our coaches grounded in the rudiments of their trade. Products of the NIS would have been all over our national teams and state squads across the 32 sporting events available in the country.

    With an upgraded NIS, we would have seen the facilities around the National Stadium, Surulere, Lagos renovated, since they would be used to train the coaches. A renovated NIS would have helped to attract sporting activities to the Sports City, instead of the piecemeal repair at the swimming pool, which hasn’t been opened after the reconstruction.

    It suits many people for the National Stadium to be in a derelict state, even when we have been told that staggering sums are being spent on the facilities yearly. No price for guessing that a chunk of the figures was used to settle NEPA bills as if the place isn’t still indebted to the electricity company.

    The National Stadium can be a tourist attraction if good managers are allowed to build up the vast land around the place. A gigantic amphitheatre of world standard can house cinemas and provide a platform for renowned musicians to host concerts. Part of the virgin land in Sport City can be used to build world class hospitality centres. It won’t be out of place to build a shopping mall or malls. Revenue from these places could be matchless with good managers.

    The talk of Lagos State Government wanting the place for selfish reasons is laughable. Stadia are leased out to those who need them for as long as they desire, with the original owners still intact. Investors in stadium management create platforms in the place where they hope to recoup their investments.  For instance, many of the big European clubs play their matches on leased stadia, with the original owners known to all. Hiring out stadia is a form of business to generate revenue.

    We must fix the National Stadium if we want to rejuvenate our sports. And it could start in phases, with places like the indoor halls, NIS, boxing gymnasium, medical centres, lawn tennis courts and car parks renovated to bring life to the place. The virgin land around the emergency exits in the stadium can be cleared to allow for the building of some of the aforementioned facilities. It won’t be out of place if the place has a five-star hotel, where our sports ambassadors can use as camping sites. It could still be open to people who need to relax or even live there for as long they like.

    It is sickening to see the unkempt place called the Nigeria Olympic Committee (NOC) building. It is the worst I have seen in the world when compared to what one sees in other countries. Nothing works at the NOC secretariat. The offices are filled with obsolete gadgets, in spite of the fact that the body’s president belongs to several international sporting and engineering bodies. I wonder why he has not considered opening up the place’s horizon to be in sync with what he sees when he travels.

    Sports City’s medical centre makes a mockery of the quality of doctors, pharmacists and others in the place. They are some of best in the profession, but they cannot function at their best under such settings. Upgrading the medical centre to a good hospital will help Nigerians who live around the locality because drugs and other utilities will be cheaper since they will be subsidised by the government.

    How do we expect the sporting federations situated inside the Sports City to perform when those who work there spend quality time killing reptiles, rats, cockroaches and other dangerous animals (no hyperbole) inside the offices.

    One federation that holds a lot for Nigeria in terms of fetching medals at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics is athletics, with Blessing Okagbare as the best prospect. We cannot bank on Okagbare always because of her marital status, although her husband supports her programmes. However, Okagbare hasn’t been able to shine at the Olympics after her bronze medal feat at the Beijing 2008 Olympics. Many athletics purists have hinged her inability to get a medal to exhaustion, arguing that she ought to have dropped one of her events. They argued further that it is only super-humans, such as Carl Lewis of America, who can win the gold medal in the 100 metres finals and the long jump within a space of three hours. They hinged their summation on the fact that both events take a lot from the athletes. This submission makes a lot of sense, if one considers the fact that Okagbare won the bronze medal in long jump in her first Olympics in Beijing, nine years ago.

    Other athletics watchers insist that Nigeria needs to invest in Okagbare like other countries do. People in this school of thought want her welfare, pre-season preparations and coaching outfits to be paid for by the Sports Ministry. I align with this school, knowing what America and Jamaican governments do for their athletes.

    There must be a synergy between the federations and the ministry in planning for the major competitions. From these meetings, ministry chiefs will know those medals prospect and arrange how to get them ready. In athletics, for instance, the government must be prepared to provide cash for them to concentrate on our plans for the big events.

    As professionals, our athletes deserve to earn their living, especially with a country like ours, which uses athletes when they are useful and leave them to their fate when they retire. If athletes can get the equivalent of what they will earn from attending small and big meets, then half of the problem towards winning at least a gold medal for Nigeria is solved.

    For serial circuit runners, such as Okagbare, she will always be invited to meets. And such invitations come with appearance fees close to $20,000 or even more. And if she gets into the semi-finals, she knows what she gets because she also will be chasing points for the season’s ranking.

    Unfortunately, the mill for producing talents here is dead. We no longer have National Sports Festivals, which used to be the breeding ground for talents. Inter-schools competitions are dead. Youth clubs in the rural areas are extinct. The youth are now gamblers. They are seen around gambling centres striving to make the quick bucks. Sports facilities in the rural areas are covered with weeds. Some others have been built up as extra classes in schools. Very few schools have space for recreation. What we have now are schools paying through their noses to hire stadium for their inter house sports.

    In the early 70s at the Government College, Ughelli, the inter-house sports competition hits the crescendo when it is time for inter-school relays for boys and girls. All these things are gone, yet we expect to produce good athletes to represent Nigeria. No way.

     Celebrating Mikel

     I want to celebrate John Mikel Obi over his decision to head for the Chinese League instead of playing for Stoke FC of England, as exclusively revealed to this writer by Mikel’s manager John Ola Shittu. The first lesson from Mikel’s move is that we now know that he is a versatile player, a trait which Jose Mourinho, aka “the Special One”, spotted when he switched the Nigerian from his attacking midfield role to the defensive position.

    Many a pundit has condemned this decision, stating it was chiefly responsible for Mikel’s inability to match Lionel Messi’s feats. Recall that at the U-20 World Cup held in Holland in 2005, Mikel finished closely behind Messi in the award for the best player of the competition. It was quite controversial then.

    Shittu’s decision also to allow Mikel head for China was hinged on the Nigerian’s quest for fresh challenges, which is what he has shown by playing in the central defence position for Tijan Teda FC of China. I hope that Super Eagles manager Gernot Rohr is taking note. The Eagles’ central defence and wing backs have been identified as its albatross.

    So, if Mikel can play in the central defence, it leaves Rohr with the best chance of playing Leicester City FC of England’s midfielder Ndidi in Mikel’s central midfield role while he replaces Troost-Ekong, who hasn’t been playing for his European side since December 2016 in the defence.

  • Political parties support 2019 elections dates

    Political parties on Tuesday expressed support to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for fixing dates ahead of the 2019 general elections.

    The parties announced the support to the commission in a communiqué at the end of their meeting with INEC in Abuja.

    INEC had on Thursday announced Feb. 16, 2019 for Presidential and National Assembly elections and March 2, 2019 for Governorship, State Assembly and Federal Capital Territory Area Councils polls.

    It explained that fixing the dates was part of its efforts at standardising and ensuring certainty of timetable for general elections in the country.

    In the communiqué read by Dr Onwubuya Breakforth, National Deputy Chairman of Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), the parties said they believed the initiative would engender certainty in the country’s election calendar.

    They said that dates were within the period stipulated by INEC for the elections.

    “We also welcome the assurance by INEC to commence the nationwide Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) in April, 2017 at local government level.

    “IPAC also pledged to fully support the commission in the registration of new voters and creating further public awareness in the distribution of uncollected Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs).

    “As a step in this direction, the meeting agreed that uncollected PVCs should be distributed simultaneously with the nationwide CVR,’’ the communiqué said.

    It urged INEC to further deepen the use of technology in elections and work with the National Assembly to remove all legal encumbrances to full deployment of Information and Communication Technology in future polls.
    On the outstanding Anambra Central Senatorial rerun election, the group called on INEC to liaise with concerned political parties to resolve ongoing litigation to pave way for the conduct of the election.

    “In view of the recent Supreme Court judgment on the election, it was agreed that INEC shall work with the political parties that have cases in the lower court to find amicable ways to resolve out of court.
    “This is to enable the commission conduct the outstanding election in the senatorial district.

    “INEC shall engage with the parties involved based on this principle,’’ it said.

    The communiqué said that all political parties in the meeting renewed their commitments to internal democracy while affirming commitment to non-violence in elections.

    It commended INEC’s effort to prosecute electoral offenders and acknowledged that appropriate sanction was the most effective panacea to electoral violence.

    “It was also resolved that this should be expanded to include all violators of the Electoral Act, no matter how highly placed.’’

    Representing INEC, the Director of Voter Education and Publicity, Mr Oluwole Osase-Uzzi, said that the commission had accepted to explore out-of-court solution to the Anambra legislative election.

    “INEC is prepared to conduct the election as soon as all legal impediments are removed,’’ Osase-Uzzi added.
    On what would happened about the announced dates for the 2019 general elections if ongoing amendment of the Electoral Act was concluded before the election, he said the commission was working with extant laws.

    “We are working with an extant law and the time for election is fixed by the Constitution.

    “So, if the Constitution is amended before 2019 or on that day and it necessitates the change, then, we will comply with whatever extant law that is available before the election.

    “But, if it is not amended before then, we go with the dates as they stand now. INEC is bound to go with whatever the law states,’’ Osase-Uzzi said