Tag: elections

  • INEC should have no excuse for not holding elections

    INEC should have no excuse for not holding elections

    Dr. Kayode Ajulo, a lawyer, is the National Secretary of the Labour Party (LP). In this interview with ADEBISI ONANUGA, he speaks on his party’s crisis, postponement of the general elections and the ongoing distribution of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs), among other issues. 

    Has the leadership crisis in Labour Party (LP) been resolved?

    There is no leadership crisis in the Labour Party. Those claiming to have caretaker committees are merely wasting their time. They do not have the party paraphernalia; they do not even have the support of the stakeholders, including the civil society. They are not even recognised by the INEC. It is funny how desperate our friends could turn out to be, they tried to field candidates and when their nominations were rejected they turned around to make efforts to condemn all candidates, but they again failed. Their foray into the party hierarchy is just meant to shore up their dwindling fortunes in the labour movement. And I am sure they have enough forest fire to put out on their farmlands now than to continue to fan the ember of discord in our fireplace. They deserve no attention for now. Labour Party is presently preoccupied with how to bring power back to the people and we are on course.

    Are you impressed with INEC’s level of preparedness, especially with PVCs’ distribution?

    Prof. Jega had four years to prepare for the general elections, but chose to be chasing shadows and pursuing frivolities instead of getting down to the important details. He had demonstrated himself in the past as a shoddy umpire, when in 2011 he had to postpone election when voters were already on queue ready to cast their vote. Those of us that contested then suffered from this ineptitude of the INEC. I nearly lost my life thereafter as I was abducted for three nights. Now INEC has unleashed an avalanche of uncompleted tasks to crown the garbage heap of laggardness and shoddiness. I can authoritatively say that out of the six steps or thereabout, promised towards a free and fair and violence free election, Jega-led INEC has only been able to fulfil one, which is the production of voters’ register. But, this is also filled with errors and a lot of omission of voters’ names. If Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola of Lagos State, or the Sultan of Sokoto, could not find their names on that ill-famed register, how much more the teeming ordinary people? In most zones of the country, a large number of voters have not been able to collect their permanent voter’s cards (PVC). For instance, in the Southwest and Northwest the figures are less than 60 per cent, and in the Northeast where it is highest, it is about 75 per cent. Secondly, seven days to election, the INEC ad hoc staff is yet to be employed and properly trained and kitted for the process, the police are not ready and the army has said it is not going to be involved. For now INEC was not ready. The preparations so far were shoddy. But with the six-week shift, I don’t think Jega should have any excuse. He has already said he is on top of the situation. Let us give him the chance to do what is expected of him as INEC Chairman.

    What is your take on elections postponement?

    Labour OlukayodeLet me quickly address the issue of nomenclature and concept. Correctly put, what has happened is a mere shift or rescheduling in the date of elections and not as postponement as such. And as at the time INEC finally did that it was already long overdue. It was more or less almost belated. Even the blind could sense that a shift was inevitable given the lack of readiness on the part of INEC. Prof Jega was not prepared for the election; stubbornly pressing ahead to conduct the polls would have amounted to an exercise in chaos. Yes, there was the issue of security, which was germane, particularly in the Northeast, palpably under siege from Boko Haram. But it would interest you that in most parts of the country more than 40 per cent of the people were yet to collect their permanent voters’ card and thus would have been disenfranchised. In such circumstance, any party that loses would definitely have had legal grounds to reject the results. Also, it stands against all reasons to think that INEC that was yet to train and kit ad-hoc staff, print ballot papers and put in place the necessary logistics would want to press ahead with the election. Those claiming that it was a ploy by the PDP are either not well informed about the true state of things or are just plainly trying to be mischievous. The fact is when all the cards were laid on the table; the parties all agreed that it was only fair to the electorate as well as the political gladiators to have a shift in date. Even if you ask some people in opposition parties now expressing their dissatisfaction, they will tell you that at the meeting with the INEC, which I attended, they had the opportunity to express themselves, but could not advance any logical argument against a shift in date of election. For me, it was a right decision, a face saver for INEC and contrary to speculations the organization that benefited the most from the shift is the INEC itself. You can also see that it has helped to douse the tension beclouding the political space.

    Do you think battle against insurgency can be won in six weeks?

    I am not a military man, neither am I an intelligence officer, so I wouldn’t know what information they had at their disposal and what level of readiness or strategic and tactical considerations that made them to make such projections. But we should be cautious of those critics, who can’t differentiate a pump action from a Dane gun. We should give our security institutions the benefit of the doubt. Nigerians need to have faith in our institutions; it is an organ of the state meant to protect the interest of all. So, if they have come out with certain claims on an issue that borders on the security and integrity of Nigeria, then we must give them that benefit of the doubt. It is also noteworthy that some people seem to have made it their cliché that nothing good can come out of this country or any of its institution except from them or when they are in power. But they have forgotten that the country is greater than any cabal or group. That is why such element would rather project the invincibility of Boko Haram than praise Nigerian officers and soldiers when  they demonstrate gallantry and unequalled heroism in the fight against Boko Haram. I think the government and the military deserve our moral support and faith in the fight against Boko Haram. If you lose election today, you can always come back to win some other time, but if you lost the country, you have lost it for good. You have lost everything, and this should be more paramount to us. We should stop running down our armed forces. He said he has already deployed all the PVCs. I think we should wait and hope he gets it right this time around instead of being pessimistic.

    There are reports that Jega may not be allowed to conduct the elections because the Presidency feels he is too independent-minded. Do you think the president can fire him?

    For me such speculations are more or less ill-wind that blows no one any good. You call someone the Chairman of an independent electoral body and you will now sack him for being too independent minded? These for me are speculations by recurrent monumental political nitwits. They are speculations by political jobbers, who are stared in the face by their dwindling political fortune and now resort to heating up the polity. As to whether or not the President has the right to sack Jega, I would say yes, with emphasis. By the provision of our sacred Constitution and other extant laws, Prof. Jega is an appointee of the President. The President, of course, has the right to fire him. This is the law and there are some issues we should not over politicise.

    Do you support the use of Temporary Voters’ Cards in place of PVCs?

    The most important thing, I think, is that people should not be disenfranchised on account of failure on the part of INEC. There have been instances of people, who cannot find their names on the register, but have evidence of registration in the form of temporary voters’ card. INEC should be ready for other options in resolving this, even if it means use of temporary voters’ card. But then that would depend on how significant such cases are vis-a-vis the pros and cons of such decision. I am apprehensive on the usage of the voters card thing, we seem to be deceiving ourselves, yes the world is moving digital, but I believe the card must be tested and Nigerians on the real and most important election should not be used as guinea-pig to test run the effectiveness of such technology.

    Do you think the president is sincere in his promise to hand over power if he lost?

    I have no doubt in the president’s commitment to the peace and integrity of Nigeria. I equally have no doubt that he is a man of integrity. He is a democrat, who respects the rule of law and I don’t expect him to deviate, even under the most difficult condition for him as a person. Let’s recall the Edo State election, his party PDP lost and he congratulated his party’s opponents. In my state, Ondo, the popular party, that is Labour Party, won and he congratulated us in which the likes of General Olusegun Obasanjo castigated him and called for his head and removal despite that the man is unfettered. The party lost in Osun State and the President embraced his opponent, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola. These instances should not be overlooked. The man is humble, he came from a lowly background, which he has not ceased from telling us, he should forever be grateful for God’s grace on him and I am sure that what he now owes his creator is to be sincere to his country.

    Some Niger Delta militants have threatened war if the president loses. Don’t you think they should have been arrested by now?

    Did you say arrest?  That is not the first time such threats are being made. And they were not the first to make such threat. I think what needs to be done is total investigation of these threats of war and to caution all Nigerians to be more decorous in their pronouncements. We also need to note that such statement by Jonathan’s kinsmen was in response to xenophobic idioms of monkeys and baboons from the opposition. I think everybody needs to be cautious. Our security agents need to be proactive in their dealings with these war mongers and all of us.

    What is your take on the President’s perception that stealing is not corruption?

    We must learn not to be mischievous or given to trivialising issues. It is wrong to take things out of context. But, I really feel what the President meant was that the problem of corruption in Nigeria goes beyond mere stealing of public funds, that it has different, deep, and more damaging dimensions. If the president acknowledged that a problem was more deep-seated than we all reckon, I see no reason why we need to take him out of context. That was the height of mischief; simply an exercise in malicious imputation. The President needs to be advised that our institutions must be strengthened and the law must take its course even if heaven will fall and if heaven must fall as I have always said, we should have enough strong men to hold the heaven from falling on our heads.

    Why is it that your party has no presidential candidate?

    The truth is, we threw it open, but with certain set of criteria which candidates must satisfy. However, no candidate with such criteria came forward. So for us, it is better not to field a candidate than to field one we will regret.

     

     

    There are reports that LP may endorse Buhari or Jonathan? Why is your party not fielding a presidential candidate?                                                                                                                                                   As for endorsing Buhari or Jonathan, we have a tradition, the committee setup has submitted its report and their recommendation must be made known to all our members before the endorsement, everybody must be carried along we are not a party inside a brief case like some parties. We are today the third largest and the fastest growing party in Nigeria and yes, Africa, all our candidates too must be carried along and we will not just endorse but actively campaign for the dynamic, youthful and cerebral Presidential candidate that will increase the lot of the workers, the youths, women and the whole Nigeria.

    The Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) election in Abuja ended in chaos last week. Is your party not bothered by this development?

    The Labour Party, as a workers-driven party, is greatly worried over the failure and alleged attempt by the former leadership of the NLC led by Mallam Abdulwaheed Omar, to abuse the electoral process by promoting electoral malpractice.  But let me state here that, we are available to assist the NLC hold a peaceful and credible election. The NLC is the hope of the common man; therefore, we cannot allow it to fail. We in the LP are saddened that the NLC could not hold a peaceful and successful transition of leadership. This should be of concern to all true lovers of democracy. The failure of the NLC to transit on the eve of Nigeria’s most important election in the past 15 years should alarm every patriot in this country. It is in this regard that we are offering to intervene and help the congress conduct a transparent and credible rescheduled election because the leadership has demonstrated that it needs all the help it could get. If left alone, the NLC might be unable to realise the objective of transparent and credible process.

     

  • Biafran group urges elections boycott

    The Biafra Zionists Movement (BZM) has urged Ndigbo to boycott the elections.

    It said the action became necessary, following the refusal of a Federal High Court in Enugu to grant bail to 11 pro-Biafra activists standing treason trial.

    Addressing reporters in Enugu yesterday, the BZF National Chairman, Comrade Onyia Cyril, said any harm done to the detained members was a harm on Ndigbo.

    He enjoined the Igbo not to participate in the polls as a show of solidarity with the activists.

    According to him, “they have been in custody not because they are pursuing a selfish cause, but for demanding the liberation of Ndigbo.

    “We urge the Igbo not to participate in the elections. This is the only honour they can do to these great patriots.”

    Onyia, who faulted the reasons given by the court, noted: “It is surprising that the court refused them bail on the grounds that they may cause security breach during this period. It is surprising because the BZF does not believe in violence, neither does it associate with any violent body. We can never disrupt any election, although we shall abstain from voting.

    “We advise the Federal Government to intervene and ensure that these harmless freedom fighters are released.

    “In our fight for freedom, we have never and will never take up arms against the state. Everything we are doing is within the ambit of international laws and treaties.”

    He urged the Amnesty International and the United Nations to intervene in what he called “the use of federal might and power against lawful Biafrans”.

    A Federal High Court in Enugu last Thursday refused to grant the bail application filed on behalf of the BZF leader, Benjamin Onwuka, a lawyer and 10 others.

  • Ex-Head of State hopeful on elections

    Ex-Head of State hopeful on elections

    Former Head of State Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar also yesterday expressed optimism that elections will hold as scheduled on March 28 and April 11.

    He also ruled out the possibility of an Interim National Government (ING)

    Gen Abubakar, who midwifed the return to democracy in 1999, spoke yesterday after a meeting of the National Peace Committee, which he heads.

    The committee, made up of security chiefs, religious and political leaders, met to discuss the state of the nation after the postponement of the general elections.

    At the meeting were security chiefs, religious leders like John  Cardinal Onaiyekan, Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese, Fr. Matthew Hassan Kukah, All Progressives Congress (APC) National Chairman Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Deputy National Legal Adviser Bashir Maidugu, Mr. Yunusa Tanko and  Senator Ben Obi.

    The former Head of State said: “We are aware that the election dates have been shifted. There have been rumours going round in the country that there are plans to form an interim government.

    “We have heard from the president that elections will hold in March. He has also said that there are no plans to have an interim government. We are appealing to Nigerians to focus their minds on exercising their right on election day.”

    “We are going to have a meeting with chairman of INEC Prof. Attahiru Jega, to ascertain what has been done regarding their preparedness.  We will ask INEC where they are, currently,” he said.

  • PDP:  Wobbling on to general elections

    PDP: Wobbling on to general elections

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) dreams of ruling for the next 60 years. The ruling party is likely  to be in unrealistic  dream, going by its recent travails. President Goodluck Jonathan’s public rating seems to be dropping geometrically. Five weeks to the general elections, many states’ chapters are battling with post-governorship and parliamentary primary crises, thereby jeopardising the party’s chances at the March 28 and April 11 polls. Scores of aggrieved chieftains are defecting to the opposition. But, more dangerous are stalwarts plotting to work against the party without defecting.  Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU examines the agony of a party going into critical polls as a divided house.

    For 16 years, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has grown from strength to strength. It appears the ruling party is now yielding to the law of diminishing returns. In 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011, it won the presidential elections conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Four years after its last victory, the confidence appears to be  waning, in the light of President Goodluck Jonathan’s avoidance of the presidential election previously scheduled for February 14.

    Many PDP chieftains acknowledge that all is not well with the self-acclaimed biggest party in Africa. Some of them now perceive the President as a weak candidate. Yet, the party is helpless. More worrisome is its plight across the states. The chapters have not recovered from the rancorous governorship and parliamentary primaries, which have polarised the fold.

    The chapters that have been relying on federal might for survival are now enveloped in anxiety. At the centre, the confidence of the party is shaky. Reconciliation in some states has been futile: no thanks to the  escalation of the post-primary crises. According to analysts, the shifting of the polls notwithstanding, PDP may go into the contest as a divided house.

     

    Delta

    Delta State is perceived as one of the strongholds of the PDP. But, observers have predicted a tough battle in the Southsouth state on March 28. The governorship primary was the turning point. The governor, Dr. Emmanuel Uduaghan, lost his senatorial ambition to the squabbles. He could not also anoint a successor. The governor had taken his preferred candidate, Fekix Obuh, to Aso Rock for presidential blessing. Later, the table turned against him. Instead of the governor, a government contractor, Government Ekpemupolo (aka Tompolo), an acclaimed Niger Delta freedom fighter, started calling the shots. When it appeared that Obuh would not fit into the calculation again, Uduaghan settled for Edevbie. But, he was also rejected. Thus, apart from forfeiting his senatorial ambition, the governor’s muscle failed him when the choice of the flag bearer and his running mate was being considered.

    Today, Urhobo are not happy with the emergence of Senator Ifeanyi Okowa, an Igbo from Udokwa.

    Besides, other ethnic groups have cried out that only the Ijaw are savouring democratic dividends in Delta. The Itsekiri alleged that the Export Processing Zone (EPZ) project was relocated from its area to Ijaw, despite pleas, The Urhobo is also angry that it has been marginalised as the majority tribe. The tribe had expected that, having lost the governorship, the deputy governorship would be zoned to the ethnic group. It lost both.  Now, its leading lights are eyeing the All progressives Congress (APC), which has picked its governorship candidate, Chief Otega Emerhor, from Urhobo.

     

    Akwa Ibom

    Akwa Ibom State Governor Godswill Akpabio is fighting battles on many fronts. When the President visited the state recently, he was embarrassed by the extent of the internal strife. The governor has come under attack for insisting on the candidature of the banker-turned politician, Mr. Udom Emmanuel. Following the exit of Umana Umana as the Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Emmanuel, a former Executive Director of Zenith Bank, was appointed as as Umana’s replacement, before his  eventual emergence at the governorship primariesas as the flag bearer. Many PDP leaders in the state have objected to his candidature, alleging that he was imposed by the governor. They have vowed to take their pound of flesh from the PDP at the polls.

    Umana, who defected to the APC, in protest, is now the opposition candidate in the oil-rich state. Analysts have predicted a tough battle. Although Akwa Ibom is predominantly a PDP state, there is division in the chapter. Prominent PDP leaders, including Akpabio’s predecessor, Obong Victor Attah and former Petroleum Minister Chief Don Etiebet, have publicly objected to the governor’s style, warning that it may be a prelude to electoral doom. Unless there is a serious reconciliation, the contest will be tough for the PDP.

     

    Sokoto

    The dust generated by the governorship shadow poll has not settled. The deputy governor, Alhaji Mukthar Shagari, was embittered by its outcome. He had been penciled down for the slot in 2007, when he was asked to step down for incumbent Governor Aliyu Wamakko. When his boss defected to the APC, he remained in the party. But, following the defection of former Governor Attahiru Bafarawa from the APC to the PDP, the calculation changed. The PDP national leadership transferred the party leadership to the former governor. Up came Ambassador Wali as a major contender for the governorship. He defeated Shagari at the primaries. But, the deputy governor’s supporters have insisted that Wali was drafted into the race in bad faith. APC is a formidable platform to contend with. The defection of House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal from the ruling party and the fact that the Speaker will be flying the banner of the APC on March 28, will further affect the PDP. Coupled with the internal strife and rancour in the PDP, the race will be tougher for the PDP.

     

    Anambra:

    PDP held sway in Anambra State between 1999 and 2003. Even, when the PDP was in power, it was in deep crisis. When former Governor Chinwoke Mbadinuju, called the shots, the party was utterly divided. He was consumed by the imbroglio. His second term ambition was truncated. His successor, Dr. Chris Ngige, could not finish his term. Godfathers demanded returns on their political investments, and when Ngige called their bluff, the state became ungovernable. Later, the mandate was restored to Mike Obi, who flew the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) flag for the eight years his two-term tenure lasted. He dumped the party that brought him into political limelight for the PDP shortly after leaving office.

    Since then, the PDP has been making frantic efforts to bounce back, but without success. The party leaders only take solace in victory at the parliamentary elections. But, the scramble for parliamentary tickets has now polarised the crisis-ridden chapter.

    In Anambra Central Senatorial District, the post primary crisis escalated last week, following the replacement of Chief Chris Uba with his elder brother, Andy, as the senatorial flag bearer. The two brothers have been making antagonistic claims to the ticket, following the parallel primaries held in the district. Chris had earlier said that he was the authentic candidate, pointing out that his name has been submitted to INEC. But, Andy’s name appeared on the INEC website as the flag bearer for the zone, to the consternation of his younger brother, who is said to be in control of the party structure.

    Also, for the Anambra North, the name of the House of Representatives member, Mrs. Uche Ekwunife  appeared on the website as the senatorial candidate. Mrs. Ekwunife and Senator Annie Okonkwo have been at loggerheads over the ticket after the primaries. Okonkwo’s supporters are kicking against Mrs. Ekwunife’s emergence as the candidate. In  Anambra South, where former Aviation Minister Stella Oduah’s name appeared as the flag bearer, there are also protests.

     

    Ogun

    The greatest tragedy that has befallen Ogun PDP is Tuesday’s resignation of former President Olusegun Obasanjo from partisan politics.   Obasanjo, who has not hidden his opposition to President Goodluck Jonathan’s second term bid, will not throw his weight behind the governorship candidate, Gboyega Isiaka, after shredding his membership card. Although the two factions of the party in the Gateway State managed to reach a truce before the primaries, the shadow poll became another trigger for passion. According to party sources, some governorship aspirants have also refused to give their commitment to the flag bearer. In Ogun East senatorial district, many are uncomfortable with the choice of Prince Buruji Kashamu as the senatorial candidate. His supposed rival at the primaries, former Governor Gbenga Daniel, had backed out of the race when he realised that he would be defeated. Many traditional rulers, political leaders and youths are of the opinion that a politician without a lorry-load of baggage would have been more acceptable to the zone, instead of Kashamu, who is perceived as a controversial politician. Kashamu is rich, but to the people of Ijebu/Remo, a Senatorial Zone once represented by former Afenifere leader and National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) patriach, the late Pa Abraham Adesanya,  the contest is not totally about financial muscle. According to sources,  the pendulum of victory may swing towards the direction of the APC candidate, Dapo Abiodun, who has been endorsed by many stakeholders, groups and associations in the district.

     

    Edo

    Edo PDP is confronted with a big obstacle. The ruling APC is waxing stronger. Governor Adams Oshiomhole has justified the confidence reposed in him as a leader liberator. Therefore, the possibility of the PDP displacing the APC is remote. Although the PDP has succeeded in wooing some chieftains, including cabinet members, the defections have not altered significantly the geo-political calculations.

    PDP is suffering from self-inflicted crisis. At its recent rally in Benin City, the state capital, controversy over N1.5 billion mobilisation money broke out. A cleric-politician is said to be at the centre of the controversy. Many youths, who turned up for the rally at the Samuel Ogbemudia Stadium, cried out that they were short-changed. The dust has not settled. The controversial politician denied that he embezzled the money. The youths were, however, not satisfied with his clarification. To them, the actual amount has not been declared. The controversy rages on. Besides, many party members are still protesting the outcome of primaries in many constituencies.

     

    Oyo

    Before the primaries, many thought that the Oyo PDP had a bright future. But the shadow poll compounded the problems of the chapter. There are now four PDP factions in the Pacesetter State. The first is the mainstream PDP, which produced Senator Teslim Folarin as the candidate. The second is Accord Party (AP), led by Senator Rashidi Ladoja. The third is the Labour Party (LP), which is fielding former Governor Adebayo Alao-Akala as the flag bearer. The fourth is the Social Democratic Party (SDP), which has Seyi Makinde as its candidate. Ladoja, Alao-Akala and  Makinde are PDP chieftains in disguise.

    The polarisation has implications for the PDP. It is now more weakened than it was four years ago. Therefore, there is no evidence to show that it can withstand the APC candidate and incumbent Governor Abiola Ajimobi at the polls.

     

    Bayelsa

    Bayelsa is the home state of President Jonathan. The governorship election will hold in the state next year. Ordinarily, next month’s general elections should be a walkover for the PDP but certain factors may make it impossible. The rift between Governor Seriake Dickson and President’s wife Dame Patience, has continued to fester. Mrs. Jonathan, who resigned as Permanent Secretary from Bayelsa State Civil Service, is not in talking terms with the governor. In fact, there were allegations that her  foot soldiers were pushing for the impeachment of the governor. During his recent visit to the state, the President clarified that he is an avid supporter of the governor. The declaration has doused the tension in the party. Unless there is a genuine reconciliation, the cracks on the wall may become widened and PDP may play into the hands of the opposition.

     

    Rivers     

    Between 1999 and last year, PDP was the dominant party in Rivers State. But, the tide changed, following the defection of Governor Rotimi Amaechi to the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), now APC. The APC has been growing in leaps and bounds in the state. But, the internal challenge to Chief Nyesom Wike’s candidature is almost proportional to the threat posed by the APC candidate, House of Representatives member Dakuku Peterside. Rivers is reputed for its four million bloc vote. Under the two-party system, the feat is difficult. Manipulation will be very difficult now that voters are more vigilant.

    PDP has a hurdle to cross. It is the challenge of zoning. The perception is that the opposition party has violated the principle. Amaechi, an Ikwerre, had proposed power shift to the lowland area from the upland area in the spirit of fairness and justice. In his view, power shift to the area that has not enjoyed the slot for 16 years will give the area a sense of belonging. The APC has now taken up the challenge of zoning based on equity by fielding Peterside, who hails from the lowland area. This may work for the PDP at the polls.

    Ondo

    The PDP in Ondo State has been in pains since 2007 when it was disgraced at the polls. The late Governor Segun Agagu was defeated by the Labour Party (LP) candidate, Dr.  Segun Mimiko. Since then, the PDP has not been insulated from crisis. Despite Mimiko’s return to the PDP, the crisis has not abated. Instead, his return has aggravated the crisis.

    Following disagreement with the governor, some aggrieved LP chieftains had defected to the PDP. However, when the governor defected, they were back to square one. The distribution of elective offices during the primaries was based on the dichotomy  of the ‘old’ and the ‘new’ PDP.  Many old PDP members who had hoped to vie for parliamentary positions were compelled to sacrifice their ambitions to the defectors. In fact, the defectors led by Mimiko had upper hand because of their perceived numerical strength. In anger, some old PDP members hurriedly jumped into the APC tent. Aggrieved chieftains who have not defected are still fighting for their future. Reconciliation has been futile.

     

    Cross River

    In Cross River State, there is a gulf between Governor Liyel Imoke and other PDP gladiators. The governor has been accused of deliberately frustrating his colleague at the bar, Senate Leader Victor Ndoma-Egba, who had planned to return to the Upper Chamber. Senate President David Mark, who had anticipated the danger to Ndoma-Egba’s ambition, had offered to broker truce between the governor and Senate Leader, who are from the same senatorial district. Two days to the primaries, Mark sent his friend, Senator Tunde Ogbeha, a retired Brig-General, to Calabar, the state capital, to beg the governor. But, Imoke disagreed. The governor, sources said, was annoyed at the activities of some politicians who wanted him dead when he was hospitalised abroad. Also, the running battle between the two lawyers assumed a new dimension during the governorship primaries. Ndoma-Egba was allegedly rooting for Jeddy Agba for the slot. But Imoke and his predecessor, Donald Duke, preferred Prof. Ben Ayade.  The primary election is still generating ripples. Besides, many Cross River elders are unhappy with President Jonathan for the role he placed in the ceding of some oil wells from the state to Akwa Ibom State.

     

    Kwara

    The weakest PDP chapter is the Kwara. Following the defection of Senator Bukola Saraki, Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed and other big wigs to the APC, the party became a shadow of itself. There is acrimony in the decimated chapter over the emergence of Senator Simeon Ajibola as the governorship candidate. Many PDP leaders believe that his candidature cannot fly. In fact, the senator rode on the back of the Saraki political family to fame. Since his emergence as the candidate, other aspirants slowed down on their mobilisation for the party.

     

  • 2015 elections: It’s time for vigilance

    2015 elections: It’s time for vigilance

    The worrisome political atmosphere in the country is getting cloudier by the day – and the reason is not far fetched: While Nigerians are still groaning over the booby trap called election postponement, Professor Attahiru Jega, Chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), during his mid-week appearance before the Senate, threw another confounding bombshell over whether the rescheduled new dates of the elections are sacrosanct or not. Asked by Senator George Akume, Minority Leader, to re-affirm the sanctity of the new election dates, Jega replied: “I think it is a very difficult question to answer…I have said consistently that there are things under the control of electoral commission and there are things that are not under the control of electoral commission. For things that are under our control, I can give definite and categorical assurances. On what is not under our control, it is futile; it is fruitless and useless to give a definite guarantee on them. I think that question should be directed appropriately. The questions of security, I will leave it, I don’t think I am competent to answer it sufficiently.”

    Jega cannot be entirely blamed for this ambivalent response because he professed to be convinced, when asked, that any request for another shift of dates would be illegal because that would run contrary to the constitutional provision that requires elections to be concluded at least 30 days before the date that a new government must be sworn which in this case is May 29. The political gerrymandering going on is not because of lack of interest or preparedness by INEC to conduct the elections but because of the desperation of President Goodluck Jonathan, his National Security Advisers, military service chiefs and other protégées’ determination to circumvent the polls simply because their projected outcomes would, under very high probability, not favour the incumbent president.

    This column has heard several illogical, nonsensical and unconstitutional concoctions that were being peddled as sinister ideas of the Jonathan team and his PDP party to perpetuate him in power. Some of his men have come out to say General Mohammadu Buhari, presidential candidate of the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) is not electable, whatever that means, forgetting that it is only the eligible voters of this country that can decide on that come March 28 when the presidential election, by the grace of God, holds.

    Nigerians definitely must, until after the elections, henceforth, sleep with their two eyes widely opened so as to be able to quickly nip in the bud whatever baleful move that Jonathan and his now widely detested team might want to fling on their laps. Even on the day of elections, Nigerians must prepare for the worse from Jonathan’s outgoing presidency because if it dawns on him that the elections could not be further postponed, he would not hesitate to unleash soldiers on vulnerable voters despite judicial pronouncements to the contrary in previous and more recent Appeal Court orbiter in the Ekiti State governorship election case.

    One obvious fact is that this jejune President Jonathan is desperate; the man is, like known power-drunk men of power in history, ready to go to any length to keep himself, albeit unconstitutionally beyond May 29 in power. But his infamous plot, just like that of some of his power drunk predecessors in power like Olusegun Obasanjo, Ibrahim Babangida and late Sani Abacha would fail beyond redemption. Like Jonathan, these men while in power, made a lot of promises to their people but they flagrantly failed to keep to the agreements. That is why it is often said that it is hard to trust the morality of inconsistent leaders.

    This column, with the benefit of hindsight, calls on all Nigerians to rise up against the tyranny of President Jonathan by voting him out come March 28. This justifiable demand for eternal vigilance to sustain this democratic liberty is amply captured in the address of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu at the recent Joint Leadership Meeting of APC which held at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre in Abuja when he congratulated his audience and other party men ‘… for walking off the booby traps and for getting close to bringing down the Berlin Wall.’’ He however admonished: ‘We cannot celebrate yet but have to be stronger and vigilant so as to be effective vigilantes for freedom, liberty and democratic government.’

    To the prospective voluntary “vigilantes” of this country including the leadership of the opposition APC, vigil must be kept not only on the bound-to-fail antics of Mr. President and his party but also on the suspicious outbursts of ex-President Obasanjo who recently tore publicly, his PDP membership card through his obtuse ward chairman, Alhaji Usman Oladunjoye, who led the executive and members of the PDP from Obasanjo’s Ward 11, Abeokuta North to his Hilltop residence in the rock-city capital of Ogun State. For political practicality, judging from the present mood of the nation against the ruling party/government which Obasanjo installed, his hypocritical outbursts against Jonathan and his government can be condoned but to a limited extent because the man Obasanjo is not only fickle but also of no meaningful electoral value? There should be a limit to the extent to which the opposition leaders and Nigerians should allow him to ride on the crest of ‘project progressivism’ sweeping across the land to settle scores with Jonathan, his errant disciple. Whatever Obasanjo sees as Jonathan’s shortcoming had been seen long ago before he foisted him on the nation and his input is not needed in the cyclonic wave across the country that is roaring to blow Jonathan and the PDP out of power. The Obasanjo’s case in his malicious battle with his inept acolyte, Jonathan, was well captured by William Shakespeare in The Merchant of Venice when he said: “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.” Obasanjo’s morality cannot be trusted.

    The genesis of Obasanjo’s animosity is not love for the cause of entrenching a progressive government but more by Jonathan’s refusal to listen to his more evil dictations that have taken the country to this unthinkable political abyss in 16 years. His and Babangida’s antecedents of duplicity should serve a note of warning to discerning progressive minded Nigerians that they should not be trusted. Let INEC do its best; let the opposition not be naïve about who their friends are and let the Nigerian people remain steadfast and vigilant in their resolve to throw out of power PDP government of stagnation come next month. Then the stroppy plots of those masquerading, as true friends of the people, will fall flat on their faces.

  • ‘Pray for elections’ success’

    ‘Pray for elections’ success’

    Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed has urged Christian faithful to use the Lenten season to pray  for the restoration of peace, especially in the face of political and security tension.

    He also advised Christians and Nigerians of other faiths to use the season to pray and work for the success of the elections.

    The governor in a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Alhaji Abdulwahab Oba, said the Lenten season called for sober reflection on individual attitudes and national challenges in order to engender a better society.

    He added that “since the Lenten season in Christendom marks a period of sober reflection, fasting and penitence in anticipation of the resurrection of Jesus Christ on Easter Sunday, it is imperative that the season is also used for a deeper and sober reflection on the state of affairs in our country.”

    He said that no state or nation could develop in a state of anarchy or violence, as resources and efforts directed towards containing violence and other forms of criminality could be properly channeled to the economic, industrial and infrastructural development of the country.

    The  Speaker of the House of Assembly, Razak Atunwa, urged Christians to use the period of self denial and sacrifice to supplicate to God for a peaceful conduct of the  elections and stability of the nation.

    He said the nation needed prayers and concerted efforts by stakeholders to restore stability.

    The Speaker in a statement by his media aide, Abdulrahman Sanni, advised politicians to embark on issue-based campaigns.

  • Elections hold in Plateau, Rivers, three other states today

    Elections into the Football Associations of five states will take place today.

    Chairman of the NFF State Elections Monitoring Committee, Ibrahim Gusau, who is among four chairmen to have retained their seats, confirmed to thenff.com that elections will take place in Plateau, Rivers, Kebbi, Ogun and Delta states.

    Elections have already taken place in Jigawa, Niger, Kaduna and Zamfara states, meaning  one-quarter of the process would have been concluded by today.

  • Elections in other troubled lands

    Elections in other troubled lands

    It is on record that even as wars, violence and insurgencies ravage some countries of the world, like Syria, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, their leaders still deemed it fit to organise national elections. The idea is to show the world that even if some parts of the countries are engulfed in crises, it will not, in any way hinder or discourage the people from exercising their fundamental responsibility of electing leaders who will continue to chart a new way for the society. Even as the wars go on and a greater proportion of the populations are affected, the leaders ensure that governance and the welfare of the people remain top priorities.

    Syria

    Since 2011, a civil war characterized along ethnic and religious lines, has been ongoing in Syria. Nonetheless, President Bashar al-Assad last year insisted that there should be an election in the war-torn country. This presidential election was held on June 3, 2014. Indeed, it was the first multi-candidates election in decades since the ruling Ba’ath Party came to power through a coup d’état.

    Attempts by the UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon, to carpet the elections were rebuffed by Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian leader. He was able to provide security even as the country recorded the largest refugee situation in the world. What the government and other appropriate agencies did was to provide ad-hoc venues for these refugees to vote wherever they were domiciled. The National Electoral Commission of Syria directed that their embassies all over the world should encourage their refugees to vote anywhere they were found. This happened a day before the voting took place in Syria. Even though some boycotted and voting did not take place in large areas held by the rebels and the Kurdish militia groups, the election went on nonetheless.

    On Election Day proper, there were numerous cases of suicide bombing resulting in over 50 deaths, but the people wanted the country to move forward. To date, the war has claimed over 150,000 lives. In fact, 7million out of 23 million population have been displaced, with about 2.5million as refugees in different foreign lands.

    Notably, this was the first election that truly challenged the incumbent based solely on the new constitution after the 2012 Syrian referendum. In the end, the turnout was 73.42 percent, including those in both government and rebel held strongholds and territories. The success of the Syrian elections shocked some world leaders who had thought the country’s turmoil would have been a hindrance against its progress.

    Iraq

    The most instructive of these scenarios is that of Iraq. With the death of Saddam Hussein, who was overthrown in 2003, the interim government set up by the UN has been saddled with the onerous task of ensuring a steady and progressive society. Up to date and in spite of the series of crises, internecine wars and suicide bombings in most parts of the country, seven national and local elections have been conducted so far.

    On January 30, 2005, the interim government held its first election to begin the process of writing a new constitution. This election was even declared the first free and fair elections both by local and international observers. It was noted to have a fair representation of all the groups in the Iraqi State and even when some insurgent groups complained about the flaws in the election, the UN adviser to Iraq’s Electoral Commission, Craiq Jennes, said the complaints were unfounded, baseless and of no effect.

    Over all, there were over 7,000 candidates who contested in the elections for only 275 seats. In December of 2005, a parliamentary election was also held as a sequel to the success of the earlier one. In January 2010, Iraq again had another parliamentary election even as serious ethnic cleansing was going on in the militia held territories.

    Thereafter in 2013, provincial councils (local government) elections were successfully held amid deep sectarian crisis in the Sunis held-enclaves of the country. The overall turnout was 51% and unfortunately elections were never conducted in 12 out of the 18 provinces of the country where wars had raged on consistently. In short, four provinces were in the stronghold of the semi-autonomous region of the Kurdistan. Much later after tension had simmered down, elections were held there. But the most interesting thing was the special request by the two provinces of Anbar and Nineveh where elections were postponed but were held later.

    Here 100 percent of the staff involved in this exercise were Iraqis with about 187 international Journalists who were provided with maximum security by the authorities. To date, about 6.4million voters have been able to cast their votes and the Iraqi Independent High Electoral Commission (IHEC) has continued to ensure that no vacuum is allowed to permeate in the system.

    Also in April 2014 another parliamentary election took place. It was when 328 members of the Council of Representatives elected both the Iraqi President and Prime Minster. While this exercise went on, a number of polling stations were burnt down by suicide bombers, leading to at least 27 deaths. Even some insurgent groups had threatened fire and brimstone in order to disrupt the elections but the leaders insisted that the election would go on.  The Iraqi situation is the most remarkable because even without a central leading figure, they’ve been able to forge ahead with their numerous elections. The citizens themselves have been demanding for a people’s representative government to chart a new way for the society.

    Afghanistan

    Since the fall of the Taliban government in Afghanistan in 2002, there has never been peace in Afghanistan. However, this has not in any way stopped elections from holding as and when due. On 20th August 2009, a presidential election was held in which the incumbent president, Hamid Karzai, was declared the winner for another five years. The election was held amidst security threats and wars in different parts of the country.

    The climax came when the Taliban, who still holds some sensitive parts of the country, called for a boycott. In the end, elections were conducted in 34 provincial councils with series of violence and bombs exploding in many locations on the voting day. Even as this was the situation, the people rose en-masse to say yes to Karzai’s insistence that they must come out to cast their votes.

    In spite of the fact that Karzai’s position as the President was also threatened, he did not cancel or postpone the elections. He did not want the five years duration to elapse into a constitutional crisis. Prior to the elections, hundreds of polling stations were shut down, but this was not to deter the people. Even when the president was accused of trying to postpone the election to suit his whims and caprices, he quickly called on the Independent Electoral Committee of Afghanistan to put the machineries in place for the elections.

    When voting finally took place, with both international and local forces to keep peace and ward-off insurgents, 12, out of 34 of Afghans provinces remained classified high risks by the Ministry of Interior. This meant that not up to one-third of the country participated in the elections. In order to beef up security in troubled areas, a week to the election, the government hired and engaged about 10,000 tribesmen and local warriors to provide additional security for the voting in almost two-third of the Afghanistan’s provinces. These tribesmen were paid on daily basis. They were able to secure 21 out of 34 provinces. In addition, the government halted all offences and other engagements by the military so as to provide adequate security to make for a successful election.

    There is no doubt that the will to move the nation ahead was paramount in the minds of the leaders. A day to the election, the insurgents attacked and threw rockets near the presidential palace in Kabul, the capital. Also a suicide bomber detonated a bomb on a NATO convoy killing nine people. All these were meant to derail voting, yet both the Electoral Committee, the citizens and the president, Karzai, stood their grounds.

    What the government did was to instruct the media to mellow down their reports on violence so as not to discourage the electorate. In its place, more security was provided in certain provinces which in effect, encouraged more voters to turn out. But in areas declared high security risks, armoured military tanks were used to distribute ballot boxes, thus creating more confidence in the polity.

    Ukraine

    In Ukraine, parliamentary election was held on 2 September 2014, in spite of the ongoing wars in the 32 Donbass provinces. Earlier on, President Petro Poroshenko had decided that no amount of fears or intimidation, inspired by the insurgents, would stop him from conducting the election. And so, the Central Election Commission of Ukraine made maximum efforts for the voting to take place in 12 Rada constituencies and in the Crimea and Sevastopol where there is serious and persistent stand-off with the Russian government. There was however, no voting in Donestsk which up to date remains the main trouble spot of the crisis which has engulfed Ukraine in the past one year or so.

    Donestsk controls nine constituencies while Lubansk, another troubled area, harbours six constituencies. In all, 27 out of the 450 seats in the parliament are still vacant because election could not hold in those places. And to cap it all, 4.6million Ukrainians within the Crimea, Sevastopol, Donestsk  and Lubansk were unable to vote. Yet, this did not nullify or confer illegitimacy on the results.

    Libya

    Since the demise of Col. Moumar Gaddafi of Libya, the country has been involved in series of wars. Yet on June 25, 2014, elections were held for the Council of Deputies as all the candidates ran on independent basis. The results were well-accepted by the people who indeed heaved a huge sigh of relief. In some places like Derna, where violence was intense, voting did not take place.

    In fact, as it were, some polling stations were burnt down few hours before voting. In places like Kufra and Serbha, just for security reasons, the Libyan High National Election Commission (HNEC) deliberately avoided voting in order to safeguard lives. But even then, on the day of election, there were several attacks geared towards the disruption of the exercise. Part of the plan was the bomb blasts by insurgents who planned to stop voting in most parts of Benghazi, the largest commercial city in the country. Cases of serious attacks happened, yet the election was held.

    Although, the results were later annulled due to an earlier court case, the Council of Deputies still holds sway in Libya today.

    As at now, there are plans to hold a referendum in March 2015 to usher in a presidential election before the year runs out. In the meantime, the Council of Deputies has been recognised as the legitimate government of Libya by the international community backed by the United Nations and others.

  • Elections must be devoid  of violence, says U.S.

    Elections must be devoid of violence, says U.S.

    United States Consul General Jeffery Hawkins has urged politicians and their supporters to shun violence before, during and after the polls.

    He spoke at an event in Lagos to mark the African-American History Month, urging Nigerians, to learn from Americans who have perfected electioneering campaigns devoid of violence.

    Hawkins said: “What lessons can we draw from the U.S.?  First of all, it is so important to cast your vote.  People have marched, been bitten by dogs and beaten by police and died to obtain the right to vote.  When we have the right to vote but don’t use it, we disrespect their memory.  So, I urge all Nigerians who are eligible to vote, to do so.  Vote.  It’s one of the most powerful weapons that we have in large, animated democracies, such as Nigeria and the United States.  Please vote!

    “Secondly, for the first time in the history of the United States, we now have an African-American President in the White House.   Having lived through the Civil Rights era of the 1960s, and having recently relived the experience through watching the film, Selma, I can confirm that the contrast is startling.  Who would have thought, 50 years ago, that it would even be conceivable to have an African-American President in the United States of America?  This just goes to show how genuine change, through the democratic process, is absolutely possible.   But you must exercise your right to vote to make change happen, to vote into office people who have a vision for a new Nigeria.

    “The third and final lesson I draw from the civil rights history is the power of non-violence. As Dr. King taught Americans, and as he taught the world, “non-violence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit.  You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him.”  It is in that same non-violent spirit of Dr. King’s that our U.S. Ambassador James Entwistle and I have been so outspoken over the past year on the importance of non-violence in Nigeria’s upcoming elections.”

    He said America was delighted to see the media, civil society and entertainers campaign against violence.

    “ As President Jonathan said in his New Year’s message, no one’s political ambition is worth the blood of any of your countrymen, women, and children. And as General Buhari recently tweeted, electoral violence is unacceptable, and every Nigerian life is sacred. Both presidential candidates have also signed on to the so-called Abuja Accord, which commits them to running exclusively issue-based campaigns, refraining from violence before, during and after election day, and speaking out against any violence that does emerge.

    “These are commitments that we need to see from everyone and they are commitments that need to be kept. Chairman Jega and the thousands of Independent National Electoral Commission employees are taking concrete steps to guarantee that this election is successful. We’ve also urged Nigeria’s governors to call for peaceful democratic engagement among their residents, and we ask all parties and all candidates to do the same. Some weeks ago, we were able to get the governorship candidates in Rivers State to come out and take this pledge in public. On Monday, I hosted a peace pledge event where we invited the leading Lagos gubernatorial candidates to go on record that they would not support violence before, during, or after the election.  Their pledges were witnessed by senior religious figures, the Resident Electoral Commissioner, Commissioner of Police, and local media.

    “Committing to non-violence, in the spirit of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., also means that you will not engage in or support violence for any reason, no matter what others do. And if you hear about plans of violent acts to be perpetrated by others, you will do whatever you can to stop it.  And you will speak out against those who advocate violence to let everyone around you know that Nigerians can do better than that.  That, and no less than that, is what Dr. King would expect.”

  • Elections and Impunity of The Prince

    Elections and Impunity of The Prince

    SIR: When the news of the postponement of the elections went viral in the social media, I dismissed it as a canard disseminated by the disingenuous and partisan online media sites.

    However, the verity of the news became confirmed when INEC chairman, Attahiru Jega, made an official announcement of the shifts in polls.

    I’m galled, and deeply saddened at the abrupt change in the election timetable; I’m disillusioned and disenchanted with the postponement and Jega‘s breach of the pledge to conduct the elections in February. In our society, and even on the African continent, it has become expedient and necessary to keep record of political leaders’ words and statements so as to make reference to them when politicians deviate from, or renege on, their pledges. Jega had, prior to the postponement, maintained swashbuckling resoluteness and doggedness towards conducting the elections in February. He had appeared as a disinterested judge bent on achieving fairness in the elections.

    I hate to believe that the shift is borne out of pressure from the Presidency and the service chiefs. I’m inclined to accept the fact that the sudden change in the election timetable, especially when so many plans have been made and huge sums of money have been dissipated, is a stratagem by the ruling party to carefully orchestrate massive rigging in the elections. It is obvious, even to the sightless. With the groundswell of opposition against his re-election and seeing the not much prospect of ascending the throne of presidency again, the president, through the National security Adviser, press-ganged Jega into shifting the polls by presenting a rather thoughtless reason.

    The need to subvert insurgency in the north-eastern flank of the country is the flimsiest and most asinine excuse to have been thought about. It is also laughable and smacks of muddled thinking.

    The Nigerian space has been beset by the scourge of insurgency for more than five years, and the federal government has demonstrated no success in its combat against it. Instead, the terrorists’ attacks have continued unabated and unchecked, with more orgies of barbarous killings and kidnappings on an unprecedented scale. Now the electoral commission wants to hoodwink the rabble into believing that the Nigerian troops will stem the tide of insurgency in six weeks!  Isn’t that laughable? If anything, it is crazy. Nigerians are not as gullible and credulous as they think.

    The words of the prophets of doom are coming alive, for our geopolitical landscape is coming to the verge of a political maelstrom.  But why would a man be overwhelmed by such devouring quest for power as to unleash destruction upon the state over which he presides?

    The demons which underlie all these political troubles must be exorcised willy-nilly. That is our passport to a new Nigeria.

     

    • Kingsley Charles

    University of Calabar