Tag: elections

  • All elections must hold next year

    The Nigerian constitution says it in the relevant section as regards tenure

    of elected officers, that all election must hold after every four years to allow the electorate have the opportunity to elect another set of their elected representatives.

    The recent war against insurgents in the country has been threatening the very corporate existence of this country, hence the fear in some quarters that the country is not in the right position to hold another election.

    The recent victory by our armed forces in curtailing the menace of these insurgents has rekindled our hope that the war against the insurgents would be surmountable, with vigour and determination on the part of our political leaders, by ensuring that all the needed support is given to our armed forces to bring to an end the stupidity going on in the north east of this country by some miscreants and rag tag army who do not want the unity of this country and its democratic development.

    The recent comment by some political leaders on the possibility of holding an election at this period of an ongoing war in some parts of the country should be seen as divisionary and uncalled for.

    Some countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq that were faced with serious security challenges like us were able to conduct successful elections widely accepted by the international communities, and the electorate came out en-mass to cast their votes without any fear of these terrorists who issued warning to them to steer clear of polling booths.

    It behoves on the part of the government to put all necessary measure in place to assure the citizens of their security before, during and after the election.

    The current war against insurgency should be seen as collective efforts by the government to ensure the protection of lives and properties of its citizenry.

    Nigerians look forward to electing leaders who would bring the much-needed democracy to them, and also afford the electorate elect or refuse to elect those that did not meet their expectations while in office.

    We believe the coming election in 2015 will offer the current democracy an opportunity for the electorate to re-elect those that made positive impact on their lives when they were in office.

    The independent national electoral commission (INEC) has been assuring the nation of its determination to conduct a credible, free and fair election in the country that would be acceptable by Nigerians and the international communities.

    We hope that as we approach the 2015 elections, our politicians would place the interest of the country at heart by conducting themselves in civilised manner to ensure Nigerians elect leaders that would make the nation to develop and grow.

    Bala  Nayashi

    No 1 Yashi Areas

  • ‘Elections in Nigeria should count’

    A cleric, Pastor Kingsley Innocent, has said to prevent rigging in next year’s elections, Nigerians should come out to vote en-masse.

    The Senior Pastor of the Bible Believing Mission Incorporated with headquarters in Abia State advised Nigerians to ensure they choose the right leaders by protecting their votes

    He urged voters to shun the freebies and deception of some politicians, saying such do not mean well for the country.

    Innocent said: “Next year, Nigerians should be decisive. They should make up their minds and come out en-masse and choose their leaders. Elections in Nigeria should count.

    “If we all come out en-masse and insist there is no rigging at each polling centre, there won’t be rigging.

  • NFF Elections to hold September 30

    NFF Elections to hold September 30

    The elections into the Executive Committee of the Nigeria Football Federation(NFF) will now hold on September 30 in Warri, Delta State.

    The date was confirmed in a circular sent out on Wednesday by General Secretary of the NFF, Musa Amadu, to stakeholders, following his return to office on Monday.

    In the letter, Amadu confirmed the agreement of the  Delta State Governor, Emmanuel Uduaghan, to host the congress.

    The first extra-ordinary General Assembly, that will be convened to elect members of the NFF Electoral Committee, and the NFF Electoral Appeals Committee, will be held on September 20.

     

  • Maigari calls for calm, assures on Sept Elections

    Maigari calls for calm, assures on Sept Elections

    President of Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), Alhaji Aminu Maigari has appealed for calm and assured Nigerians that normalcy will soon return to the nation’s football administration and stave off the hanging threat of suspension from the Federation of International Football Associations (NFF).

    He also assured the football community and the general public that elections into the Executive Committee of the NFF will hold before September 25 after an Extra Ordinary Congress scheduled for September 18.

    The NFF President also dismissed insinuations of crisis in the nation’s football administration, pointing out that only five persons have been trying to cause confusion within the ranks.

    “It is important that we remain calm and don’t take action or make comments that will aggravate the situation. We are very positive that those who may have inadvertently caused us to incur the threat of suspension from FIFA will retrace their steps and save Nigeria the trauma experienced these past months”, noted the NFF President who addressed over 41 Delegates and Board members earlier in the day.

    FIFA had in a letter of September 4 and signed by the Secretary General, Jerome Valcke directed Chris Giwa and others purporting to have been elected to theNFF Board to vacate the offices by 7am Nigerian time on Monday, September 8 or the country will be automatically suspended from all organized football activities.

    On the elections which FIFA directed should be held, Maigari said “we are going to hold the election before September 25 and the Extra-Ordinary Congress will hold to ratify the roadmap as requested by FIFA”.

    Giwa, the proprietor of Premier League side, Giwa FC and five others have been occupying offices of the NFF Board, insisting that they were elected at a supposed Congress held on August 26.

    According to the NFF boss, ” it is gratifying to note that we have consistently worked in consonance with the NFF, CAF and FIFA Statutes and we will not deviate from that path but urge those who have taken wrong steps to retrace and they will be accommodated”.

    Maigari said he is reaching out to constituted authorities to rein in the recalcitrant few.

  • Yagba-Kogi to support APC in next year’s elections

    Yagba-Kogi to support APC in next year’s elections

    The Yagba-Okun people of Kwara State have urged the All Progressives Congress (APC) to zone its Kogi West senatorial ticket to the Yoruba-speaking bloc.

    TheYoruba-speaking people are inthree local government areas of Yagba West, East and Mapa/Amoro.

    They have alleged marginalisation, poiting out that none of its indigenes has enyoyed the slot since the creation of Kwara State in 1991.

    Reiterating their support for the APC, they said the zoning of the slot to the three councils will give them a sense of belonging.

    In a statement in Ilorin, the state capital,  stakeholders from Yagba Federal Constituency pointed out that Col. Tunde Ogbeha (rtd) from Koton Karfe/Lokoja area represented the district between 1999 and 2007 and Senator Smart Adeyemi from Kabba/Bunu/Jumu constituency has represented the district from 2007 till date.

    It added: “Senator Ogbeha served two terms and Senator Adeyemi is in his second term. Both are of the PDP. For the sake of justice, equity and fairness, it is our turn to produce the next senator for the district.”

    The people lamented that the two PDP senators have not represented their interest in the Upper Chamber, urging the APC to come to their rescue.

    They said they have confidence in the senatorial aspirant, Mr. Samuel Aro, who is contesting in the APC.

    The statement stressed: “It is our firm belief that, of all the politicians aspiring to occupy the seat in the next legislative dispensation, Mr. Samuel Dele Aro of the APC from Odo-Eri, Yagba West Local Government Area, possesses the requisite experience to give the district in general and Yagba people in particular quality representation.

    “Having served as a member of the House of Representatives between 2007 and 2011, he is eminently qualified to represent the district appropriately and with aplomb too. He didn’t disappoint us as a member of the then House of Reps.

    “Our people are also convinced that it is the APC, the party of the progressives, that can lead us out of the current socio-economic and political predicament that has been our lot.”

  • NFF interim C’ttee releases 2014 Elections’ guidelines

    NFF interim C’ttee releases 2014 Elections’ guidelines

    The new Nigeria Football Federation Electoral Committee headed by Samson Ebomhe has released a new guideline for the September 4th, 2014 NFF elections and it is as follows:

    “In exercise of its inherent powers pursuant to Articles 20(i), 21(i) and 23(a) of NFF Statutes, 2010, the General Assembly, the supreme legislative and governing organ of the NFF, at its meeting on Tuesday 26th August, 2014 re-constituted the NFF Electoral Committee to conduct the 2014 elections into the Executive Committee of NFF.

    The General Assembly further mandated and authorized the Electoral Committee to take all steps and do all such things between August 26, 2014 and September 4, 2014 as may be necessary and required for the conduct of the 2014 elections into NFF Executive Committee.

    The General Assembly deems as proper and valid as if in due compliance with all the applicable Articles of the NFF Statutes 2010, the Electoral Guidelines, the Electoral Code and all other ancillary regulations and Standing Orders of the General Assembly, all steps taken and all things done by the NFF Electoral Committee between August 26, 2014 and September 4, 2014 for the conduct of the 2014 elections into NFF Executive Committee.

    Accordingly, NFF Electoral Committee in discharge of its mandate to ensure an elective process that is free, fair, transparent and open to all candidates, hereby, announces the following further guidelines for the conduct of the 2014 NFF Executive Committee elections:

    1.All qualified and interested candidates have the option of either downloading the requisite application forms from the Electoral Committee website, www.nffelect2014.com or, alternatively such candidates can physically obtain the forms at No. 9, Arusha Crescent, Wuse Zone 1, Abuja.

    2.Forms are available to all candidates in the options set out in “1” above until Monday September 1, 2014. However, the forms are available for download as from 12.00pm August 28, 2014.

    3.Duly completed forms are to be returned to No. 9, Arusha Crescent, Wuse Zone I, Abuja before 6.30pm on Monday, September 1, 2014.

    4.Candidates are advised to return their completed form with bank draft made to the order of NIGERIA FOOTBALL FEDERATION (NFF). Cash payments are equally acceptable. Candidates shall be issued with a receipt acknowledging payment.

    5.All candidates who previously obtained their forms but were unable to submit are eligible to participate in the 2014 NFF Executive Committee Elections on September 4, 2014. Such candidates are advised to submit their forms as advised in paragraphs 3 and 4 above.

    6.All other candidates who previously had been cleared to participate in the 2014 NFF Executive Committee Elections are eligible to participate in the elections on the basis of their previous clearance, and will not require any further or fresh clearance. It is important, however, that candidates falling in this category communicate their willingness to participate in the elections either by letter to the NFF Electoral Committee at the  addresses listed earlier in this Notice or by e-mail to info@nffelect2014.com.

  • Lawyers divided on use of soldiers for elections

    Lawyers divided on use of soldiers for elections

    Lawyers have expressed divergent views on the use of military personnel, particularly masked armed men, for elections in the country. Some described their deployment as illegal and unconstitutional, while others saw nothing wrong in it, saying as long as it ensures a free and fair election.

    One of those, who spoke against it was the former chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ikorodu branch, Sahid Shillings. He said it was dangerous deploying masked armed personnel.

    He said if one was caught in a cross-fire, it was unlikely to seek  protection with masked armed personnel even if he was fighting one’s enemy.

    Shillings said: “Some of the security experimentations, including allowing policemen in mufti carry ammunitions, could endanger the public even when the intention is genuine.

    “I first saw masked soldiers at the NBA election in Abuja. I was shocked and a bit frightened because anything could happen. Somebody must explain to me what a security officer does that he needs to hide behind a mask. If I am caught in crossfire, I will not run to a masked man even if he is shooting a known enemy. There seems to be danger lurking behind these masks. We will never get used to them. In fact, they only remind us of the predictions for 2015. The Federal Government should reconsider the action because we are preparing too.’’

    Former secretary of Ikeja branch of the NBA, Mr. Adesina Adegbite, also condemned the action strongly, saying: “It was indeed, a very demeaning and condemnable act that is not good for the image of the country.”

    However, an activist, Ikechukwu Ikeji, disagreed insisting that it does not in any way violate any provisions constitution. “it is playing the ostrich to say that the deployment of soldiers to help the security apparatus during the Osun State governorship election was an outright violation of the constitution. Nothing can be farther from the truth. This view point is either borne out of ignorance of the law or mischief or propaganda,” he said.

    Section 218 (1) of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria, According to him,  provides as follows: “The powers of the President as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federation shall include power to determine the operational use of the armed forces of the Federation.” This simply portends that if the President determines that it was necessary to send in the armed forces to help the security, he is acting very much within his powers under the Constitution.”

    Ikeji argued that soldiers have been used by sundry States in Nigeria to help the Police to combat armed robbery and kidnapping and that there has been no criticism of that process, “with even most state Governors providing financial and material support to the military in these combined operations.

    “In Lagos State, for example, we have the OPERATION MESA operating under the command of an army officer and having armed forces personnel as key members. This simply portends an unusual situation. Unusual problems require unusual remedies”, he stated.

    He said “the essence of our present democratic pursuit is to achieve a one man one vote electoral process and the Osun and Ekiti elections, in my humble view, have both achieved this. The use of the military did not derogate from this result. One can claim that the result of the Osun State governorship election was rigged or manipulated or was not a reflection of the wishes of the Osun people but we can only honestly ascribe this success to the presence of the military.”

    Ikeji advised that people  should desist from being unduly cynical about a necessary event that the presence of the military is.

    “Some questions come to mind. Did the military stop one man one vote? Did the military stop anyone from coming out to vote or did the military force anyone to vote against his or her wish or did the military change the election results?

    “Those saying that the presence of the military was over militarisation have not given us a realistic option.

    He advised that what we should take out of the present situation is to start putting effective measures in place to ensure that with time, we can conduct elections without the deployment of troops.

    “This will happen over time, but for now, our democracy and politicians are too corrupt to leave in the hands of politicians in the strict sense. In Osun, there was was massive turn out, people behaved themselves and even the military never interfered with the process.

    “If you juxtapose this with the fact that the President has a constitutional power to deploy troops, then we would all be in agreement that the will of the people came to pass and that is the bottomline in elections.

    “It is too utopian to leave elections in the hands of politicians today and expect a free and fair election.

    “One would even suggest that the Osun State governorship election template be used by INEC to conduct the entire local government elections in Nigeria until such a time that we could put our acts together,” he stated.

     

  • Why we upheld zoning for elections,by lawyers

    Why we upheld zoning for elections,by lawyers

    LAWYERS  have spoken on their last election, citing reasons for respecting zoning.

    Mr. Augustine Alegeh (SAN), who is from the Midwest Forum, was elected the 27th President, even though the post was zoned to the Western Forum, popularly known as Egbe Amofin. The leaders have also put to rest the fear of Mid-West Bar Forum in the zoning.

    The Nigeria bar association (NBA) rotates the Presidency among the Eastern Bar Forum (EBF), the Western Lawyers Forum popularly called the Egbe Amofin and the Arewa Lawyers Forum also called Arewa. Under this arrangement, each zone chooses its candidate  and sends the name to others for voting.

    The arrangement fared well till the regime of Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), when agitation for the creation of  more zones, began to get attention  from  Bar leaders. This made Agbakoba to constitute a committee  headed by the former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim.The submitted its report, but it was not ratified by the then National Executive Committee (NEC) of the NBA before its tenure ended.

    The agitation continued under Joseph Bodunrin Daudu (SAN), who called a meeting of the Bar leaders to discuss the issue. The meeting, according to some lawyers, did not take a definite position while others argued that the meeting resolved that the Midwest and  Egbe Amofin are one. They were asked to go home to resolve how they would have their slot whenever the Presidency of the Bar comes to the West.

    In 2012, the leadership of the Midwest Bar Forum visited Egbe Amofin in Ibadan to discuss this matter and the Egbe Amofin received them warmly, promising to give them their  slot in 2020.

    The Midwest frowned at this position because, according to them, Egbe Amofin has taken its slots under the regimes of Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) and Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (SAN). To the Midwestern Forum,  asking them to wait for eight years was unjust and inequitable.

    They left and promised to revert to Egbe Amofin after discussing with their people. However, they did not report to EgbeAmofin; rather, they went ahead and contested the election feilding Augustine Alegeh (SAN) and won.

    Against this backdrop, a section of the Bar said zoning was not respected in the election and as such, had been set aside. But leaders of the NBA fora are of different view. They believe that no outsider contested the election. All the four Presidential candidates, according to them, were members of the Western Lawyers Forum and were eligible for the position.

    The Secretary of Egbe Amofin, Mr. Ranti Ajeleti said: “First, I am speaking as an individual not as the Secretary of Egbe Amofin.Having said that, I would say the zoning arrangement was not strictly adhered to, but on a second and deeper thought and with equity being the fulcrum,  I would say the Mid-West is part of Western Region. Rather than being complacent the Mid-West fought its way into uniting with the Egbe. Consequently since the winner did not come from outside the Western Region, we can say the zoning was respected.”

    He continued: “But from my own personal perspective, the main object of arranging the zoning was not achieved.  To the critics of the zoning arrangement that it is undemocratic, I disagree with them because thepresent collegiate system is not democratic at all. A much more democratic system would have been one lawyer one vote and not the collegiate system. I personally subscribe to the zoning system for two main reasons among others.   To reduce the cost of electioneering, it is on record that the last Bar election in terms of cost to each of the presidential candidates, would compare favourably with Nigerian Presidential election  spending.

    “Candidates spent fortunes  in their electioneering campaigns. Considering the risk of traversing Nigeria, the candidates visited over 100  branches, criss-crossing the whole Nigeria; going into villages, towns, and homes of opinion makers and supposedly Bar leaders. They attended weddings, burial ceremonies, social outings of   supposedly influential members of the Bar in all nooks and crannies of Nigeria, even when they  were uninvited. Some even went as far as contacting non-Lawyers, who they thought could help them contact renowned Lawyers to support their aspirations. The risk of accident on the Nigerian roads, which I had cause to  describe as “slaughter slabs”. Why playing “Russian Roulette,”Ajeleti asked?

    “About two months to the election,” Ajeleti said: “We made a last-minute effort to let the contestants from our zone see reasons.We held a meeting at Ikorodu in Lagos State.  Our hosts, Chiefs Benson (SAN), Sofola (SAN), Bandele Aiku (SAN), Afro Fayokun, Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (SAN) and Wole Olanipekun (SAN)  with some top members of the Bar were there. The candidates refused to see reasons.  We left the venue about 8 p.m. and   headed for Ibadan, taking the old Ikorodu-Ogijo- Shagamu Road to link Shagamu-Ibadan Expressway.

    “We aimed at getting to  Ibadan within an hour or thereabout, but soon after we left, we got into a gridlock and did not reach Ogijo – a distance of less than 20 kilometres from Ikorodu, until about midnight,” he explained.

    Narrating their experience, Ajeleti said shortly after the gridlock a vehicle speeding furiously from the opposite direction almost collided with their vehicle. “It missed our car by an inch, but Chief Priscila Kuye’s vehicle was not so lucky.  Her vehicle was directly behind us. The on-coming vehicle brushed the driver’s side, scraped  the mirror and pushed the Mercedes Benz  Saloon car off the road into a ditch, causing its front tyre to burst.”

    He said the incident made them to get to Ibadan very late. “We did not get home until about 2.00 a.m. It occurred to me that this was what each contestant was faced in the course of the campaign. But was this worth it?Do we have to wait until the preventable happens? he asked.

    He recalled that when the “Egbe” picked Akeredolu in 2008, he did not spend one per cent of what each of the last presidential candidate spent. Each candidate, he said,  had to attend “Bar week” of every branch and  drop a token for them.

    “Should it be? Strictly speaking,  the regional fora  did not play any role in the last presidential election.  My study showed that the five presidential candidates had good outings across the nation. For instance Akintola (SAN) captured the votes of Benue State; Osas Erhabor captured Ilesa and Ife while Adesina (SAN) did well in Owerri, Adekoya( SAN)  did well in Kaduna and Alegeh (SAN)  did well in Port Harcourt,” he said.

    Comparing candidates’ performances, Ajeleti said Akintola and Erhabor did not do well in the elections. “I agree they could not have done better,  I wouldn’t know when the duo started nurturing the ambition of becoming NBA President, but they started their campaign  barely a year ago while the likes of Mrs. Adekoya and Adesina had openly expressed their interest over eight years ago,” he said.

    On whether the zoning arrangement should be laid to rest, Ajeleti said: “ I may not be expressing an opinion I will be talking about the realities on the ground.  Now that it is the turn of the Arewa, they will want zoning to remain and the Eastern Bar, which would be the next beneficiary after Arewa, would want it to stay. But  the Egbe that burnt its fingers  would want it discarded,  particularly those who lost out this year might want to try their luck in two years time.”

    On whether it is necessary to strengthen  zoning, Ajeleti said: “ If we cannot strengthen zoning,  then we should go back to universal adult suffrage, which would reduce the influence of money.  It would be difficult to buy all voters. Right now, it is very easy to buy the chairman of a branch, who would choose delegates during election. Principally I adopt totally the analysis of my good friend, Prof. Odinkalu, on the last election, particularly his recommendations.”

    The EBF Chairman, Mr. Ogbonna O. Igwenyi, said: “The arrangement was well respected in the last elections because all the five candidates that contested  for  NBA Presidency came from the defunct Western Region of Nigeria. None came from another region. That was in agreement with the unwritten design of the NBA,  to give each region the opportunity to govern the body. It does not matter to the association from which section of the region the candidate comes from,  provided the person comes from the zone that has the chance to provide candidates to be voted.

    On whether the regional fora, such as Arewa, Eastern Bar Forum(EBF) and Egbe Omofin, played any role in the last election, Igwenyi said: “My answer is yes. This is because it was the turn of the West to present to us one of their own as the preferred candidate. EBF waited and refused to endorse any of the contestants for the office of President. We had candidates of our choice for most of the elective offices, but for the Presidency, we did not.”

    According to him, the reason for not adopting any of them stemmed from the fact that EBF had no mandate to choose for them who to endorse for the office. “Besides, as they say, it would amount to taking a pain reliever for another person’s headache,” he said.

    He continued: “When they failed to endorse any of them, we from EBF decided that we shall vote according to our conscience for the office of president. Don’t forget, we had our ears to the ground when it became an open contest for the Presidential hopefuls. All the candidates campaigned vigorously in all the branches of the EBF before the election,  hence we were able to note their relative strengths  and weaknesses.’’

    Austine Alegeh,  Igwenyi said, carried the day because he came from the West and had a section of that region, Mid West, behind him. “Even though we did not adopt Alegeh, we knew that he had an edge over his opponents. He is unassuming, intelligent, unpretentious and open to suggestions to move the Bar forward. Above all, his men knew how to talk to their colleagues in a delicate electoral process. I guess, Arewa and  a good portion of the Egbe bought into the Alegeh project for the reasons I have stated. Some will tell you that Alegeh spent a lot on the campaigns, but I stand to correct that impression. All of them except  O. J. Erhabor did,” he said.

    The best candidate, Igweni said, won. “Zonal arrangement in electing NBA president cannot be compromised in any election. When Mrs  Adekoya contested against the candidate of the EBF many years ago, the zone took it to heart. The misadventure played out in the last election as most leaders in the East considered that affront dangerous to be forgiven so soon, the rest is now  history,” he said.

    Igweni noted that in two years, the pendulum would swing to the North and any candidate not of Arewa extraction would fail. “Die hard opportunists can try their hands, but it will not change anything. Zoning has been canonised, any day it is brought to the floor of NEC for reaffirmation, you can only hear muffled descent, but the result will be landslide,” Igwenyi said.

    Assessing the election, the Chairman, Arewa Lawyers Forum (ALF), M. A. Abubakar, said: “There is a need for one to understand the workings of the zoning arrangement before one ventures a response. Yes, zoning was respected in the sense that we all appreciated that it was the turn of the West to produce the President of the NBA this time around.”

    According to him, difficulties were encountered by the West in their inability to present a single candidate to the other Fora to support, which had the effect of throwing   the election open in the region.

    Voters, he said, voted for candidates of their choice, who were all from the Western Region. “Regional fora really played very significant role as can be seen from the fact that the various meetings the fora held  in the build up to the elections  turned a Mecca of  some sort for all serious candidates,’’ he said.

    Abubakar said zoning still exists because it is in the interest of the NBA to continue with it. “Zoning must be strengthen by revisiting the report of the Committee of Inclusion headed by Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim (SAN), which was set up  during Olisa Agbakoba’s tenure as President,” Abubakar added.

  • Ogbeni’s victory; Omisore’s defeat: the 1965 Western Regional Elections Revisited

    Ogbeni’s victory; Omisore’s defeat: the 1965 Western Regional Elections Revisited

    Be se tiwa, bee si se tiwa, Demo a wole [Whether you are with us or not, Demo will win] 

    Declaration on radio and television by Chief Remi Fani-Kayode on the eve of the 1965 Western Regional Elections

    Ogbeni’s victory

    Free, fair and credible elections are to a genuine democratic order what oxygenated blood that flows without blockages, clots and hemorrhages is to a healthy human body. In this case, the human body is like a nation’s body politic: a nation on the brink of becoming a failed state, a nation that hobbles from one nation-wrecking crisis to another is like a diseased human body whose arteries and veins are so blocked that the vascular and circulatory systems are prone to, and sometimes give way to cardiac arrest or stroke. Fortunately, and thanks largely to the wonders of modern medical science, cardiac arrest and stroke are not always fatal. A quick and effective intervention can bring a person stricken by stroke or heart attack back to life and the chance to gradually recover either completely or with a fairly good chance of a long and productive life. These thoughts were at the back of my mind on Sunday, July 10 when around 8 a.m. Berlin time (7 a.m. in Nigeria) I went online and discovered to my great relief and satisfaction that Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola had soundly defeated Iyiola Omisore in the recent Osun governorship elections. To me, the Ogbeni’s victory was like a successful triple bypass heart surgery to an electoral system that has hovered for a very long time on the edge of political cardiac arrest. Please note that I say that these thoughts comparing the diseased human body to a national body politick in a perpetual terminal crisis were at the back of my mind and not in the foreground of my consciousness. Let me explain.

    Now, the regular reader of this column ought to know by now that I am not a supporter of any of the ruling class parties in Nigeria. I am resolutely against the ruling party, the PDP, which, in my opinion, is one of the worst, one of the most corrupt and one of the most mediocre ruling class parties in the world. But I do not consider any of the opposition ruling class parties a sufficiently consistently progressive and clean counterforce to the PDP. As political parties aspiring to power, the only claim that all the opposition parties have is the fact that any other group or party can and will do better in office than the PDP. The most telling fact of the absence of a real or true choice for voters between our ruling class parties is the quite phenomenonal scope of the perpetual crossing and re-crossing from one party to another by members of our political class. In other words, in the present political order in power at the centre and in the states in our country, you can never be so corrupt, so mediocre, so cynical and so devoid of any ideas as a politician that you cannot move from being a chieftain in one party to becoming a kingpin in another party. Nothing, absolutely nothing, disqualifies you from being a power broker in one party today and a strongman in another party tomorrow. This situation is similar to the phenomenon in the linguistic philosophy of the identity of the letters of the alphabet in which, say, the identity of the letter A is established, not by anything in itself, but by the fact that it is not B, or C, or D or any of the other letters in the alphabet. Thus, by the logic of this philosophy, in the Nigerian political context APC is APC not because of some things inherent in the party but because it is not PDP

    But real choice for the voter in Nigeria is fortunately not completely absent. For if it is the case that, at least for now there is no real choice between the political parties as parties with programs, policies and worldviews that distinguish one from another, there is sometimes a choice between candidates. In the Osun State governorship elections last week, there was a real choice for the voter between the Ogbeni and Omisore, quite apart from the election being a pre-2015 showdown between the APC and the PDP. Indeed, so palpable, so stark was the choice between the two candidates that it was like a choice between day and night or between light and darkness. The most evident indicator of this is the fact that Aregbesola is quite possibly the most articulate governor on the ideals and practices of good governance in our country at the present time while Omisore, on the evidence of his unscripted speeches and impromptu pronouncements, cannot put two or three coherent thoughts together on responsible and accountable governance.

    To expatiate a little more on this distinction, Aregbesola belongs to the rather rare order of politicians in our country at the present time who actually think; who actually have progressive and compassionate ideas about obligations that governments have for their constituents; and who actually have sophisticated knowledge regarding where our country and our continent stand in relation to the rest of the world and the contradictory forces of modernity, especially in the new millennium. By contrast, Omisore is a political operator whose vocation begins and ends with making the best for himself politically by following party diktats and carrying out the will of his superiors in the party apparatus.

    Last week as I waited anxiously for the results of the Osun state elections, I began to think, rather subliminally about the analogies between a diseased human body and our national body politic. And as I did so, I worried greatly that the PDP might have completely buried the real choice between the Ogbeni and Omisore under the weight of pre-2015 showdown between the APC and the PDP. In the entirety of my experience as a Nigerian very much aware of the precarious nature of electoral politics in our country, no incident stands out more in my consciousness as the ultimate negation of the voter’s choice than the chilling declaration of the late Chief Remi Fani-Kayode on the eve of the legislative elections in the Western Region in October 1965. This is the declaration that I have appropriated as the epigraph to this piece: “Be se tiwa, bee si se tiwa, Demo a wole”. I have given an approximate translation of this declaration: “Whether you are with us or not, Demo will win”. By “Demo”, Fani-Kayode who was the Deputy Premier to Chief S.L. Akintola, meant the Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP), perhaps the most fascist, right-wing party this country’s politics has ever produced. But what does this observation have to do with last week’s Osun state elections? Again, let me explain.

    Among other things, all fascist parties have this in common: the votes – and the will of the electorate – are always already subjugated to the control of the Party. Last week, the ghost of the fascist political legacy of the late Deputy Premier of the old Western Region in the mid-60s appeared and stalked the length and breadth of Osun State. The choice between Aregbesola and Omisore seemed about to be completely abrogated and denied the good people of the state. But Ogbeni’s victory sent it back to the shades of the netherworld of bad conscience and troubled and troubling memory where it belongs.

    We must not be complacent. PDP is determined to make every election before the 2015 showdown a prologue, a foreshadowing of the total elimination of choice and popular will in our country’s electoral politics. The militarization of the electoral process is particularly apposite here. Most commentators have said of this phenomenon that it is meant to intimidate voters, especially those voters that wish to exercise their choice, not only between parties, but also between candidates. While this is true, I think there is something more sinister, more ominous in this militarization of the electoral process that Jonathan has taken to a far much bigger scale than we had hitherto ever seen in this country. The sheer size of the military presence can mean only one thing: anticipation of mass uprising, of widespread popular rejection of election(s) that people in their hundreds of thousands or even millions perceive as rigged, stolen. Ekiti and Osun: two gone, more still to come before 2015. I repeat: we must not be complacent; we must not tire of protesting to the high heavens and to the whole world that we reject the militarization of the electoral and political processes in our country. Ogbeni’s victory is enormously gratifying in itself; it had the additional advantage of reminding us that the popular will counts and must be defended.

     

    Omisore’s defeat

     

    “Congrat osun people, congrat APC, and congrat Nigerian, people have spoking and God have spoking too”

    From a tweet by someone self-identified as “Musco”

     

    I encountered the epigraph above when I was reading the reactions to the defeat of Omisore on the internet. The bizarre and colorful murder of language in the tweet made me laugh hard, very hard. It reminded me of the language of Chief Zebrudaya Okoroigwe Nwogbo, alias 4:30. The language of tweets on the internet is often so awful that it seems to come from undiagnosed cases of mental leprosy. But in the particular case of this tweet commenting on Omisore’s defeat, it seemed to come straight from the heart. And at any rate, it read like vintage Zebrudaya English. But consider the following strangulation of logic, syntax, tense and grammar from a letter that Omisore wrote to the press on the night of Saturday, July 9, to protest what he saw as premature release of elections results by the APC in order, according to him, to delegitimize the true results of the elections which he was confident would end up in his favour. The statement was personally signed by Omisore who, by the way, added the title “Dr.” to his name. Here goes:

    “I hereby condemn the APC candidate, Raufu Aregbesola declaring his own version of the results without recourse to INEC. With the facts of results, its apparent the PDP candidate, Dr. Iyiola Omisore, is leading. This act of APC is in conflict with the provisions of Electoral Law 2010 whereby a candidate can concoct figures and released to confuse the public thus make this election inconclusive until facts behind the figures are released by the INEC. The peace and stability of this state is such under an unprecedented threat. The result so far by APC remained cancelled.”

    A use of language protesting defeat that paradoxically ends up in a thorough defeat of language. It is unintended but is revealing, very revealing.

     

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Rights abuse during elections

    The 1999 Nigerian Constitution, as amended, elaborately provides for fundamental human rights in sections 33-44. The constitution however in section 45 provides for derogation to the fundamental rights guaranteed in sections 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41, on a limited circumstance. That restriction on rights exists with respect to only a “law that is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society – in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health, or – for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons”. The constitution also makes allowance for certain acts of parliament in “the period of emergency”.

    Considering this limited provision for constitutional infractions, it is fair to ask on what basis are we experiencing widespread infractions of the fundamental rights of partisans during elections; which cannot be justified on the exceptions in Section 45 of the 1999 Constitution, as there are no provisions in the electoral law made to derogate the fundamental rights of persons under that section. So on what basis does our security agencies engage in clear abuse of the rights of citizens, through arbitrary arrests and detention during the preparations for elections, all in the name of security. Recall that before Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti was defeated in the last state gubernatorial election in questionable circumstance, his fundamental right and that of his followers to freedom of movement as enshrined in Section 41 of the 1999 Constitution were allegedly threatened. Also affected were the rights of his supporters and colleagues from other parts of the country.

    While Governor Rauf Alegbesola may have convincingly won a deserved re-election for a second term as the Governor of Osun State, the fact that a number of his supporters and party officials were allegedly arrested and detained before the election gives cause for concern. Also, the allegation that hooded men paraded as security agents before the election and had a field day threatening and intimidating citizens of Osun State, as if such conducts constitute part of their security brief, deserves to be thoroughly investigated and where there are infractions, those responsible should be punished. It will be unreasonable for all the alleged breaches of security protocols to be swept under the carpet, without any lessons for those who may have abused the laws of our land, for partisan purposes, being held to account.

    Part of the responsibility of our democratic process should be to train the police and the military agencies, if we must use them, for civil purposes during election. While the democratic process envisages that only the police authority should be engaged during elections, as the responsibility of the military are clearly spelt out under the law, our experience is however that our military personnel are also engaged to provide security during elections. So, it might pay our democracy better, if there is a special training for the security personnel that will be engaged during elections. If we consider the fact that security agencies will be drawn thin during the 2015 general elections which will take place simultaneously across the country, with the commander-in-chief as a partisan, then it will be understood why our security agencies must be engaged in a training process to make then less partisan.

    Such tutorial will be necessary to enable the security agencies to understand the need to respect the fundamental provisions of our constitution, so as not to bread fundamental ill-feeling that can jeopardise our fledging democracy. During that process the leadership of the security agencies, should be engaged by international institutional agencies to appreciate the difference between obedience to the laws of the land and obedience to the temporal office holders, such the President, the Governor or even high ranking legislative officials across the land. As we experience during elections, many of the agencies have the illusion that their primary responsibility is to ensure the success of the party of the commander-in-chief or the executive governor or other high ranking state official, even at the detriment of the survival of the very process, which is the democratic governance, that produced the official, for whom the security agent has become glaringly partisan.

     

    The threat from Ebola

     

    The closest to the threat from Ebola Viral Disease (EVD), I guess, is the remote fear of a nuclear show down between the world powers. Even the fearful Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) does not have as much potency as EVD to disrupt over lives. The simple reason for this near helplessness is the fact that one can become a victim of EVD, even with great circumspection, unlike AIDS. That perhaps explains the mass hysteria that herald the birth of the disease in Nigeria.

    Thankfully the federal and Lagos State governments are taking steps to contain the dreadful disease. It is such a hard task, considering the population of our country and the boisterous nature of our living. As many are asking, how on earth can we contain a disease that transmits by contact, when we must go to market, hop into a bus, warmly embrace our neighbours and eat whatever we can on the go? But as we experienced during the last Sunday service, the usual handshake which forms part of the mass ritual in the Catholic Church was skipped. Even the children are getting sensitised after their early morning bath within last week following the ridiculous hysteria that bathing with salt and warm water is an antidote to EVD.

    Thankfully again the doctors have called off their strike. While I sympathise with them over their demand for a better working condition, it would be ridiculous for them to keep away form work during this type of emergency. The world must find a cure for EVD, fast enough.