Tag: Electricity

  • Electricity consumers protest in Asaba

    Scores of residents in Asaba, the Delta State capital, and its environs, yesterday, protested what they called “outrageous” electricity bill for April by the Benin Electricity Distribution Company (BEDC).

    The protesters said the April bills the company served them were estimated, and not based on actual consumption.

    They accused BEDC of exploiting them with the estimated billing system instead of using prepaid metering.

    A resident of Ibusa Road in Asaba, Mr Musa Shaibu, said the April bill was strange.

    “They served me N20,000 instead of the monthly charges of between N2,000 and N3,000 that I used to get in the past months.

    “How much is my salary? There is no way I can pay this bill because I know that in the next four months, my household cannot consume N20,000 on Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) bill alone.”

    He said the meter readings were estimated, adding that what was indicated in the bills were at variance with his meter reading.

    “The truth is that the billing system is outrageous. There is fraud in the readings. How can they give N14,000 bill and above to all consumers in Asaba and its environ?

    “Government must address this issue before it gets out of hand because I am not ready to pay this bill.”

    Also, Mrs Elizabeth Oghana, of Leo Okogwu Street, off Direct Labour Road, Asaba, said her monthly electricity bill jumped from N4,000 in March to N19,000 in April.

    She said: “The challenge is this: I am not living in the house; it is a self-contained apartment. I rented it so that whenever I come into Asaba I can stay there.

    “On March 28, I came and I met N8,075 electricity bill and paid N8,000. But just a few days ago, they brought a bill of N19,000 for April. This is why I have come to lodge a complaint in this office.

    “I am not operating a factory in the house and I don’t stay there. How can I pay this outrageous bill that I am sure I did not consume?”

    A resident of Okpanam, Mr Dominic Adewale, said BEDC, since January, had been serving what he called overestimated bills.

    Adewale said: “I have a functional analogue meter, but they never come to read it. Each time, they served me with over estimated bill.

    “I have endured since January and managed to pay their charges. But when the April bill of N16,000 came, I could not contain it.

    “So, I protested and wrote a petition, attached a photocopy of the April bill coupon and dropped it at the office in Asaba.”

    BEDC’s Corporate Affairs Officer for Asaba and Agbor Business District Mrs Esther Okolie said the company was working on a template to get the average consumption rate of the consumers.

    She noted that BEDC was not getting commensurate returns for the power supplied to the consumers because of energy loss.

    According to her, the company is having a backlog of energy supplied to consumers that cannot be accounted for.

    Mrs Okolie said: “These issues will be looked into. This recent development will enable us to get the average consumption rate over a period of time by consumers. It will also help us to check faulty meters and those that have been by-passed.

    “We know it is painful, particularly in this period, but the management is working on that.

    “We are installing prepaid meters and mounting them on poles to check by-passing of the meters by fraudulent individuals.”

    The spokeswoman urged the protesters to record their meter readings on their April bills coupons and drop them at BEDC’s Customer Care for the attention of the management.

  • Businesses bear brunt  of unstable electricity

    Businesses bear brunt of unstable electricity

    When Tolulope Akanni, 36+concluded his apprenticeship as a shoe cobbler in 2004, he looked forward to a successful career in the line of his trade. Armed with a small capital which he raised from family and friends, he set up shop at Iyana-Ipaja axis of Lagos, an uptown district, where he carved a niche for himself with his signature style shoes comparable only to brand names like Hugo Boss, Alberto De Mario, Gucci, who hug headlines of fashion magazines worldwide.

    Naturally, as his clientele grew, Akanni began to nurse the idea of the export market, especially within neighbouring countries like Togo, Ghana, among others.

    Of course, to make this dream a reality he took some loan and used a landed property which was his inheritance as collateral to secure the facility.

    With the money, he hired a few hands, rented a bigger space which he equipped with state of the art workstations.

    However, a midnight fire ignited by a spark in the generating plant razed down the factory to smokescreens.

    Of course, he had to indemnify the landlord of the house he rented for office space. To make matters worse, he had to give up the landed property he used as collateral to secure the facility at the bank because he couldn’t pay up.

    That is how the dream of a promising young man was cut short.

    Recalling how his business empire died its natural death, one of Akanni’s siblings, Olawale attributed the mishap to epileptic power supply.

    “If power was stable, there won’t have been any reason for Tolu to get a generator in the place. As we speak, Tolu is now eking a living on the streets of Lagos as a commercial motorcyclist popularly known as Okada.”

    There many Tolus out there who have had their dreams literally killed as a result of incessant power cuts.

    Erratic power supply renders economy prostrate

    To say epileptic power supply has rendered the economy literally prostrate is simply stating the obvious.

    Among those affected are manufacturers who have had to incur over 70 per cent rise in cost of operations as a result of poor power supply.

    According to a report from the Manufacturers Association, of Nigeria (MAN), members companies in the past three years, spent N20.8 billion, monthly on power generation to run production process.

    MAN President, Frank Jacobs, said the ripple effects of the power shortages and constant outages were numerous, ranging from cut down in production, job loss to outright closure or relocation to other countries by industries.

    He added that companies had to bear so much loss as the outage often occurs when goods are in the middle of production.

    He said: “when you are producing and power is taken unannounced, goods in line of production would be destroyed.”

    As a result of this, Jacobs said many members of MAN have resorted to generating power privately and completely cut off their operations from the national grid.

    “Most companies, like Coca cola, Wempco, Nigeria Flour Mills and especially the multi nationals self-generate their power. They don’t rely on the national grid. And for the last three years, our study showed that our members spent averagely in a month, N20.8 billion,” he said.

    Echoing similar sentiments, the Director General of the Nigeria Employers Consultative Association (NECA), Mr. Segun Oshinowo, said generating alternative power to run the manufacturing sector is expensive and invariably increases the cost of production.

    Oshinowo said as Nigerian companies operate in the global market, the consequence of incurring high cost on power generation undoubtedly would make the nation’s industries less competitive.

    Corroborating Oshinowo, the Director General, Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), Mr Muda Yusuf, said members of the Chambers, be it multinationals or Medium, Small or Micro Entrepreneurs (MSMEs) have all resorted to alternative source of energy, ranging from gas, diesel or PMS, which he said is affecting their cost of operation and overall effectiveness.

    “Some of the big companies have completely cut off from national grid to private gas supply as means of providing power for their operations. This is because some of their operations and productions cannot work with the epileptic power we are experiencing in the country. All the multinationals are generating their power themselves right now.”

    Yusuf said though some of the companies still manage to operate on public electricity, but noted that they have to revert to diesel to power their generators anytime there is an outage, which he said is more expensive.

    “Those that suffer most now are the SMEs and the micro operators that rely on generators, more so now that the fuel is not even available, their problems have been compounded,” he said.

    The National President of Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA), Chief Bassey Edem, said that despite the privatisation of the power sector, there is still epileptic power supply in the country.

    He lamented that the country generates less than 5,000 megawatts (MW) of electricity for its over 170 million population.

    This, Edem said, does not go anywhere in meeting the requirement of the Nigerian people. He stated that many Nigerians that are out of job today would have been employed, directly or indirectly, if there is reasonable power supply, adding that manufacturing industries would operate well, expand their capacities and employ more people.

    Ripple effects of poor power supply

    With a remarkable increase in operational cost and poor purchasing power of consumers, the manufacturing companies have had to lay off thousands in the last six months, with about three million still to go.

    A 2015 report of the Good Governance Initiative (GGI), a non-governmental organisation advocating uninterrupted power supply in the country, says Nigerians spend N3.5 trillion on fuelling their generators annually.

    Its President, Mr. Festus Mbisiogu, said an intensive research conducted by the body to ascertain the negative multiplier effects of unsteady power supply last year showed that the manufacturing sector spends over N800billion yearly on generators.

    He added that this is apart from about N2 trillion spent on running generators by over 17 million Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs), banks, other corporate entities and traders across the country.

    He explained: “In the banking sector, each branch spends over N4million on diesel in a month. When you multiply that figure by the number of bank branches in Nigeria, it could be collosal. An average family man spends between 60,000 and N100, 000 in a month on fuel, apart from the maintenance.

    “With over 6,133 bank branches and each expending N4million on diesel a month, N48million will go down the drain in a year, and this will amount to N294.4billion per annum across all the branches. This means that not less than N1.5 trillion must have gone into diesel purchase in the past five years. This is outside the amount spent on powering ATM points located outside banking premises and maintaining the generators, among other critical banking infrastructure,” he stated.

    Financial experts say the amount spent on fuel and generators by manufacturers and SMEs will increase remarkably this year as 2016 is clearly the harshest since the 2008 global economic meltdown.

    Recently, the organised labour raised an alarm that the food, beverage and tobacco sector of the nation was on the verge of shutting down and that over three million jobs were at risk due to the inability of companies to meet the crippling cost of production.

    Already, leading companies in the sector such as Nigerian Flour Mills, Nigerian Breweries, Guinness, Nigerian Bottling Company, 7-UP Bottling Company, Friesland Campina Wamco, among others, have written to labour for discussions on planned sack of workers.

    Telcos worst off

     The telecoms firms are in a fix considering the fact that many cannot cope with the rising cost of generating their own power supply.

    Currently, there are some 25,000 base stations spread across the country all powered by generating sets. They serve over 150 million subscribers.

    These structures, according to industry experts, are grossly inadequate for the huge subscriber base that our network operators carry. That may then partly explain why Nigerian subscribers and consumers of telecommunication services are not getting value for their money.

    Analysts are of the view that quality of service can be improved with provision of electricity to reduce cost of operation.

    Besides, the analyst reckoned that if government provides adequate electricity, diesel spends can be diverted to infrastructures.

    Citing a report of the company’s financials in the year end, Mrs. Amina Oyagbola, Corporate Services Executive, MTN, said, MTN Nigeria presently has 12,000 base stations across Nigeria. The company, she noted, could have built more and further increase the quality of service but for higher operational cost particularly diesel. For instance, in 2014, MTN Nigeria spent N30.5bn on the purchase of diesel.

    This amount, experts said, could be used to build another 5, 000 base stations which could have help improve the quality of service in Nigeria and probably contribute to lower call rates.

    According to Oyagbola  some of MTN’s investment in infrastructure to boost quality of service dates back to January 2003, when it commissioned the first phase of its digital microwave transmission backbone called the Y’ello Bahn. Constructed at an initial cost of $120 million, the first phase of Y’ello Bahn spanned 3,500 km. The second phase which started in July 2003 extended the project to cover a total of 4,500 km.

    The length of the entire digital microwave transmission backbone currently stands at 11, 400km. This interconnects with Cameroun in Borno and Cross Rivers States and with Niger Republic in Sokoto State.

    In terms of distance and capacity, this makes the Y’ello Bahn Africa’s most extensive digital transmission infrastructure which has significantly contributed to enhancing call quality on the networks. This also included the deployment of fibre optic cables across the country to boost the transmission capacity on the network.

    Corroborating Oyagbola, a telecoms expert, Soremekun Adio, observed that most of the telecoms networks rely on power to run their base stations and this can only be done reliably using private power plant because the public power source is grossly inadequate if available at all.

    Aviation sector not exempted

    In the aviation sector, many businesses are going through very hard times. It is estimated that the industry is incurring an additional cost of about N100 million, having to power its facilities on generators.

    The National Bureau of Statistics put the total number of SMEs in the country at over 17 million, many of which rely on generators to run their businesses as the country continues to grapple with abysmal power generation.

    Speaking with The Nation at the weekend, a lab scientist who simply gave his name as Gabriel said by the nature of his work, he hardly relies on public power source.

    “I expend a lot of running cost for diesel on a weekly basis. What I spend is between N10-N12, 000 on diesel and sometimes it could be higher depending on the traffic we have in the lab in a week.”

    While giving assessment of the present administration, he was, however, quick to admit that President Muhammadu Buhari was barely trying to right the wrongs he met on ground.

    Gabriel probably spoke the mind of Minister of Power, Raji Fashola, who has always argued that the protracted crisis in the nation’s power sector was burdensome  hence requires critical restructuring.

    Though small businesses like Gabriel’s are probably not captured in the statistics reeled out by bodies like NBS and GGI, they suffer a lot of anguish still.

  • ‘Electricity industry needs fresh  ideas,  not new tariffs’

    ‘Electricity industry needs fresh ideas, not new tariffs’

    Mr. Lai Omotola is the Group Managing Director/Chief Executive of CFL Group of Companies and Publisher/Editor-in-Chief of InfraWatch Nigeria Limited. In this interview with Adeyinka Aderibigbe he speaks on the recurring problem of power cuts and proffers solutions. Excerpts: 

    Can the recent increase in electricity tariff guarantee stable supply of power in the country?

    The new tariff regime will not produce desired result the way the Minister of Power, Mr. Babatunde Fashola has painted it. The reasons are not too far-fetched. The reasons really border on two main factors. One is the technical capacity of our indigenous companies as it were today. Two is the financial capacity of the indigenous companies to bring together necessary infrastructure that can guarantee steady supply of electricity in the country.

    Does that suggest that the power assets were sold to the investors without established expertise and capacities in the electricity industry?

    A bidding process was actually put in place at the pre-handover of these legacy assets. A bid was called. On the basis of the bid, there are two factors the government will also look at. These are the factors I have mentioned earlier. The technical and financial capacities are the basis for which every company will be rated or scored. But what we have in appraising the technical part is a situation whereby an indigenous investor brings a technical partner. And then the government looks at the kind of partnership the technical partner has with the indigenous investor without much emphasis on financial wherewithal. From the beginning, we said it was not enough for indigenous companies to just bring technical partners. It would have been better for indigenous companies to bring the technical partners that would also bring equity into that partnership. That is lacking today. The truth is that if the man brings equity, the difference is that he is not now a contractor to the indigenous companies. He is also an investor in the company. Now, the indigenous companies will now be able to leverage on two things: its technical competence and financial coverage. That was missing in this bid and we are where we are today. As far as this sector is today, we do not have a dominant foreign equity player.

    If the foreign technical partners did not bring equity, how then did the indigenous investors managed to acquire the power assets?

    We know power infrastructure development is probably the most financial intensive project in Nigeria. So, we need people with deep pocket. In 2013, the federal government and Bureau of Private Enterprise (BPE) raked in a sum of $2.6 billion. I can say about 80 percent of the fund was provided by the Nigerian banks. Ordinarily, it should not be that way because foreign investors are primarily supposed to bring majority of their own equities in terms of the capital mix, where you find investors bring at least 60 percent equity. In this situation, most of the funds were sourced from the banks. It is debt, which is now creating a little bit of pressure on our financial system. We find a situation whereby the Nigerian banks are the major, if not the sole, financiers of the acquisition of the power assets. There are two factors with the Nigerian banks. One is the high interest rate. Two is the tenure of their funds. These two factors cannot successfully finance the electricity industry. They can only act as working capital incentive. What we find today is that the Nigerian banks are financed in dollars-dominated terms. Already, interest rate has gone on the high side. Even, the value of dollar to naira had doubled over the space of two years. The resultant effects, if the truth must be told, is that the accounts of our indigenous companies are not doing well in the banks. If their accounts are not doing well with the banks, the ability of the companies will be stalled. Also, the ability of the indigenous companies to pay loans will stalled. Finally, the ability of the indigenous companies to generate additional funding will be stalled.

    You raised a critical question on the financial accounts of the indigenous companies. Does mean the federal government does not really understand the financial status or capacities of these indigenous companies before increasing tariff?

    The federal government indeed understands the situation. The federal government understands that there is a financial problem. The federal government also understands that the problem was actually created by the inability of these indigenous investors to generate adequate funding that the electricity industry really requires. The Federal Government and investors under-estimated the sector. To come clean that there is a financial problem, the federal government decided to use another strategy. What is this strategy? The strategy is help the indigenous companies through the increase of electricity tariff. What is the tariff going to do? It will only achieve one objective. It will only help the indigenous companies service the loans at the expense of the consumers. When the loans are served, there could be a little of an opportunity for the banks to now raise adequate capital for expansion. But that is neither here nor there because even our banks are also into serious trouble. What we are saying is that there are two problems confronting these indigenous companies, namely the technical and financial challenges?

    Beyond their financial challenges, can you provide more insight into the technical challenges these indigenous companies are facing?

    On average terms, there is a lot of leakages in terms of revenue collection. The ability to collect revenue is not there at all. For these indigenous to successfully collect revenues, they must deploy technology. In the area of technical competence too, the indigenous companies are lagging much behind. These are the technical challenges that they have. Aside, if the truth must be told, there are a lot of people using illegal electricity. Some are tapping from underground armour cables. Many are bypassing the pre-paid metres. The revenues that the power distribution companies are supposed to generate are not coming due to all these acts of sabotage. How do they solve? The indigenous companies can only solve the challenges with the use of technology. Again, technology will cost good money. Another issue is that estimated billing is the cash cow of the business. It is the juice of the business. Now, the federal government comes with a plan that the indigenous companies must meter everybody in two years. It should be other way round. The indigenous investors should have provided stable electricity supply first before increasing tariff? What we find now is that we are giving you two years to meter all consumers. If the sweetener is the estimated billing and the billing will rise by 45 percent, then the cash flow will increase from estimated billing. It is simple arithmetic. The proposal of the National Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) on disputed bills cannot work. NERC has proposed that once bills are disputed, the consumers should not pay the bills. Rather, they should pay what he paid last. Subsequently, the consumers can write a letter and there is a body of people that will look into their complaints. Ikeja Distribution Company, now Ikeja Electric, has over 450 customers. How many people will they be able to adjudicate on issues arising from estimated bills? Do they have capacity? You can see that it is not going to working without gainsaying.

    With the picture you have painted, it appears we have real challenges ahead for this industry. Can these companies really weather through?

    Let us look at this way. We must understand that this is an industry that needs financial muscles. Two things run with the players of the industry. First, the indigenous companies that bought the legacy assets are not known names in the electricity industry. What is their antecedent? Have they been doing electricity business for 10, 20 or 50 years before they bought over the legacy assets? These are just entrepreneurs that saw opportunity and believed that they could maximise. There is absolutely nothing wrong about it. It is good. But again, as an entrepreneur, you must know when to take your business to the next level. The people that started Coke Cola are not the ones running Coke Cola today. But when you hold on to the assets and do not look at how you will take that business to the next level, there is a problem. Second, the challenge we have today is in the business model. Really, the business model is not in the Electricity Sector Reforms Act. It is the business model of these indigenous companies? What are the brands of these companies? How much can the brands attract globally in terms of investors? I will give an example. Dangote is known for cement. That is why it is easy for Dangote to set up cement factories in different African countries. Do you know the reason? It is simply because the template is already made. He goes to every country with the same template and the same team because that is what he has been doing for the past 30 years. Is it not amazing that the same Dangote is building $15 billion dollar refinery? Is not amazing that the same Dangote is now a player in the electricity industry in Nigeria?

    What should the federal government do in this kind of situation now that it is glaring from your submission that electricity tariff increase is introduced at the expense of consumers?

    Really, what is emerging now is that the federal government is trying to spoon-feed the indigenous companies. These are private companies, but the federal government gave them subvention. That subvention from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has come. It is just a drop in the ocean. We remember the subvention that the CBN provided for the companies to pay for gas. It has not worked. Another one is coming. If the minister is sure of himself, let him sign an indemnity to or guarantee Nigeria that if the power is not stable in two years, he would resign because we have had enough talk. We have started counting again. Nothing will change tremendously in two years, even with electricity tariff hike. Our stake in this matter is that of transparency and logics. Also, a proper business should be deployed into the electricity industry and original players with established expertise and capacities in the electricity industry should be allowed in. The experts that have been in the electricity business generation over generation should be allowed to come in. An enabling environment should equally be created in a way that Nigerians will begin to see the future. Nigeria’s electricity markets cannot be compared to that of Ghana and South Africa. It is ridiculous to make that kind of comparison because our populations are different. The electricity market is enormous and attract huge profits. But the investors are not there.

    On what should the federal government provide the indigenous companies subvention since the power assets are now fully in their hands?

    It is not about government intervention, but a real reappraisal of business model whereby people must understand profitability in this industry will not come in five years. In actual sense, there must a reappraisal of business model. It is a business that profitability comes in five years. Our banks can only finance between two and three years.

    0That is the issue here. Between two and three years, our banks want to see their funds coming back. So, our banks are not suited to fund the electricity industry. The minister said no bank would want to fund the industry because the price is not bankable. Can Fashola tell us, which of the bank he is referring to? If Fashola is referring to Nigerian banks, the business model of the indigenous companies will not work? The interest rate and fund tenure will not make it work. What we are suggesting is that the federal government should set up a finance development bank that strictly towards development projects such as this should be quickly put together. If our local banks will play any role, it will be in the area of providing working capital. We are just supporting these projects by working capital. This is a complete shift from what we have today because for those companies to survive, they need very low interest rate with very long-term loan. Also, they need a robust capacity to handle these projects. Without being technical and ingenious, walk around streets anywhere in Nigeria and what you will see is dilapidated transformers, overhead cables still running and former NEPA vehicles just repainted among others.

    These are signs that finances are very weak. Because when a new company set in, it begins to pull down the old things and starts setting up new ones. You will see new transformers everywhere and change overhead cables among others. In fact, every person will see the impact. But you can only see our people unhappy and indigenous companies in crisis. From all said so far, electricity tariff hike is not the solution.

    Can the federal government really get out of this maze of crisis in the electricity industry?

    Nobody is saying the federal government should use funds from Federation Accounts to pursue an industry that has been deregulated. You cannot use funds from Federation Accounts to finance it. The Electricity Sector Reforms Act has defined the roles of all players. The federal government is just like a regulator. The power industry can be said to be like telecommunication industry. The federal government cannot use funds from Federation Accounts. As a regulator, what the federal government can do is to create an enabling environment in a way that these operators can move to the next level. Do they start? First, we know we can generate from the dam. We can generate from wind. We can generate from gas. We can generate from coal. So, we assemble all these things together and say these are the sources of our power generation.

    When we assemble them together, we now begin to zone it. This area will concentrate on coal. That area will concentrate on wind. Another area will concentrate on gas. When we zone it, we begin to peg the megawatt each area will generate. By the time we do all these things, we have the aggregate of what these areas can generate. Even the renewable that we are talking about, we are using mouths. We should be able to state how we are going to start the renewable energy and how we are going to graduate.

    We have to go about it in such a way that it becomes a masterplan that all stakeholders sign on to it. We now look all these areas. There are estates in Lagos today that enjoy 24-hour electricity. What that tells us is that Lagos is a good place for embedded power and captive generation. If someone sets up Independent Power Plants (IPPs) on the Mainland in four places, that person will be profitable. Is there any enabling environment for an investor to set up IPPs? There is no enabling environment.

  • Nigeria’s electricity system collapses

    Nigeria’s electricity system collapses

    The Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) yesterday announced the collapse of the electricity syytem in the country, a development that led to zero allocation of electricity to distribution companies (DisCos).

    Due to this, the Nigeria Electricity System Operator (NESO) noted on its website that it generated nothing and allocated nothing at that particular time to the 11 DisCos across the country.

    Prior to the time of system collapse, the  electricity market recorded 2,243.20Mw from which it allocated 257.97Mw to the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company (AEDC).

    According to the source,  the power crisis being experienced nationwide since Tuesday this week worsened yesterday with a total system collapse at exactly 12.58pm.

    “At that point, the nation went to Ground Zero, with all the DisCos receiving Zero Mw allocation from the NESO

    Earlier in the day, AEDC’s allocation was 257.97Mw while the nationwide generation level stood at 2,243.20Mw.

    “We do not know the cause of the System Collapse yet but you can do your checks with the SO.”

    Managing Director, SO, Mr. Dipak Sarma confirmed that there was a system collapse at Ihiovo.

    He said: “Yes, it was because there was a system collapse today (yesterday) at 12.45pm. At Ihovha power plant that led to a loss of 100Mw.”

    However, what was lost at that moment was more than the 100Mw that the market lost from the system collapse at Ihovba power plant.

    Three days ago,  power generation at the hour of 08.37.00 was 2,030.50Mw.

    It was an indication that energy generation in the electricity market dropped 875.2Mw within 24 hours from the 2,905.70Mw of Tuesday.

    NESO is the arm of the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) and it allocated  yesterday’s load as follows: Ikeja 304.58Mw, Abuja 233.51Mw, Eko 223.36Mw, Benin 182.75Mw, Enugu 182.75,Mw Jos 111.68Mw, Kano 162.44Mw, Kaduna 162.44Mw, Port Hacourt 131.98Mw, and  Yola 71.07Mw.

    The operator had at the same hour of Tuesday allocated 435.86Mw to Ikeja, 334.16Mw to Abuja, 319.65Mw to Eko, 261.51Mw to Benin, 261.51Mw to Enugu, as Ibadan received 377.74Mw, and Jos got 159.81Mw.

  • Senate and electricity regulation

    SIR: As the authority in charge of generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, part of the duties of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) is to ensure that participants and stakeholders in the industry adhere strictly to the rules and laws of the electricity industry. In doing this however, it has to ensure that it creates a fair and competitive playing field. This is a cardinal rule in any game, industry and environment where there are set goals and objectives.

    When goals and objectives in any industry are met, there are rewards and approbations when such achievements are obtained strictly by following the rules as generally expected. That was what was at play when the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN),   the regulator of the Nigerian banking industry   pounced on, penalized and asked some banks to pay for wrong charges allotted their customers. This in effect showed that such banks have violated the rules of the game or profession of banking and have behaved unethically or unprofessionally. This goes to show that regulation is a game of carrot and stick and the regulator wields   immense authority to dispense justice no matter whose ox is gored. This simple fact of regulation is very much at play in the Nigerian electricity delivery system where electricity distributors called Discos are monitored stringently by the regulator – NERC.

    It was therefore a great surprise to industry watchers in the electricity delivery system that the Senate has interrupted the march of the electricity industry in Nigeria to modernity and world standards and quality by asking NERC to stop the announced increase in electricity tariff. The Senate’s order was predicated ostensibly on its perceived exploitation of Nigerians by the operators. But  can this be right or does it make sense  and more importantly, is it fair to the statutory regulator, NERC? Definitely the answer is no.

    As already pointed out, the duty of NERC is to administer justice and mete out punishment to those who violate the rules of the industry and so far this body has done very well to deter violators or potential violators of its rules. Indeed, in the electricity industry, one can boldly state that the fear of NERC is the beginning of wisdom for practitioners and stakeholders in the electricity and power sector in Nigeria today. So, how come the Senate has taken over the responsibilities of NERC as if the regulator has abandoned its responsibility to protect the Nigerian electricity consumer?

    The Senate by overruling NERC on the tariff issue is unwittingly or deliberately accusing NERC of negligence and lack of patriotism and those are grievous charges that must put NERC in a very tight corner indeed. But is that conclusion correct or deserved by NERC? That is something that NERC itself would have to defend.  The senate too must show its locus in interfering in the price regime of tariff allocation, which is the purview of NERC according to our statutes.

    If the Senate felt aggrieved by the tariff increase for whatever reasons, it should have raised its concern earlier or called NERC to face the appropriate Senate committee to explain the rationale or reason for the tariff increase announced over a year ago for implementation this year in February. That is the fair and reasonable thing to do. For now, what the Senate has done is to throw away the bath tub with the baby. That is not fair to NERC  and it is not fair to the long-suffering Nigerian electricity consumer waiting to get his direct billing meter from the Discos scattered all over the country  poised  to move the nation out of the present darkness.

     

    • Segun Onifade,

    Ondo.

  • Our Girls; 10,000Mw NOW, NOT 2019! Electricity is an Emergency, not an astronaut in space

    Our Girls; 10,000Mw NOW, NOT 2019! Electricity is an Emergency, not an astronaut in space

    Our Girls are still missing since April 15, 2014 though one may sadly have been forced to become a recent suicide bomber, we pray even as more than 300 Agatu Nigerians murdered by Fulani herdsmen perhaps from ‘abroad’. This is exactly like the horrendous happening in New York, London, Brussels, Paris, North Africa but Nigeria does not value life with even a moment of silence! The authorities have never decisively acknowledged or intervened in the escalating FULANI HERDSMEN/ FARMER WAR except to disarm farmers. Rather the authorities accuse a ‘foreign legion of devils’ from neighbouring countries as the murderers. O yes??? Nooo!  If so, that is AN INVASION breaching Nigeria’s territorial integrity and a declaration of ‘WAR ON NIGERIA’!!! Soldiers have been killed. If ‘foreign enemy units’ dressed in combat jackets, firing AK47 ammunition at poorly or unarmed defenceless women, children and farmer fathers and  occupy farms, rape and murder, is that not WAR? If Nigerian Fulani herdsmen are not involved, then they should join farmers and the Federal Government against the ‘AK 47 armed foreign militias’ herding cattle through farms taking crops WITHOUT PAYING [aka STEALING] and destroying lives and livelihoods [aka TERRORISM, ARMED ROBBERY, DECLARATION OF WAR]. Already the attacks have caused tens of thousands of Internally Displaced Persons. BY DRIVING WILLING FARMERS OFF THEIR LANDS there will be a LACK OF WILLING PRESENT AND NEXT GENERATION FARMERS. As a traumatised orphaned child, would you aspire to farm in future if you entire family and village are wiped out for being farmers? Could this be the aim –to wipe out certain farmers and claim their lands? The result will be vast lands unfarmed, unemployment and food shortages. Eventually there will be retaliatory ‘laying waste the land’ by ‘scorched earth’ bushfires to starve ‘foreign’ cattle until RANCHES AND TRAIN TRANSPORT ARE INTRODUCED. This is laying the foundation for a ‘FULANI HERDSMEN/FARMERS FAMINE IN NIGERIA’. What will tomorrow’s cows eat? Who will BOYCOTT and who will eat tomorrow’s cows? Even cow-meat needs farm vegetables! COOPERATION NOT CONFRONTATION IS THE KEY TO A GOOD MEAL. A FAMINE is a VERY REAL AND PRESENT DANGER that the Federal Government needs to prevent!

    The Rivers State brand of ‘murderous democrazy’ demonstrated rivers of blood, maniacal mayhem horrifyingly exemplified by the murder of a young NYSC member, Okonta Samuel, add weight to the horrendous ‘life is cheap’ Nigerian circumstance. A death does not matter to a greedy politician!  Get this straight. It cannot and is not the responsibility of INEC to provide security at polling booths and collation centres. INEC is a civilian election body. It is not equipped by law to compulsorily operate in a zone where the political participants are MURDEROUS CRIMINAL COMBATANTS with POLITICAL goals. It is the responsibility of the Federal Government and states to for safe elections. They fail repeatedly but no punishments!

    No amount of compensation, scholarships, naming graves, roads or buildings after the deceased NYSC OR OTHER PARTY MEMBERS OR POLITICAL THUGS can wipe away that failure or the smell and sight of that blood spilt for the greed of others, still alive and unwilling to submit to democratic procedures, in attaining their evil ‘democratic ‘ambitions.

    The one major ‘change’ is we are promised a mere 10,000Mw within three years –no change! Should we applaud or be appalled, appreciative or angry? Our leaders in the past stole our power money! Now we are broke and in 2-4,000Kw darkness! As a developing country, in three years our power needs will double. The UN reports power needs are 1,000Mw/1million or about 150,000Mw for Nigeria which always had the money but the authorities were too serially greedy and short sighted to provide it under past regimes since 1960, failing the power vision. Instead they bought generators for themselves and to hell with the rest of us, abi?  Today half our fuel import bill provides power from environmentally disastrous generators, which supply 95-100% power needs of most Nigerian homes and businesses. So what will a paltry 10,000Mw do for Nigeria after so many stolen billions, so many ruined businesses and so many millions of dreams have been poured down Nigeria’s drain, truncating growth of brains, the youth and businesses nationwide and driving companies abroad? It is too little! When Japan was faced with its nuclear disaster, Fukushima, it replaced the lost 10,000Mw in three months with emergency power supplies from specialised companies. POWER HAS BEEN MADE AN IGNORED SHAMEFUL EMERGENCY killing Nigeria. Government must not run away from the RESPONSIBILITY OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE.  Nigeria can and must provide 10,000Mw within three months by decentralising power and sharing responsibility with states and the private sector. Electric power must be devolved to states under true federalism. Abused federalism has caused our massive power fraud. Many states have governments as fraudulent as the recent federal governments but TRUE FEDERALISM is long overdue. WE WANT POWER NOW, and all other things will follow –increased jobs, business, and taxes! This promised 10,000Mw plan must be REVISED UPWARDS TO 20,000 OR 30,000MW BY 2019, BY ANY MEANS- United Nations, World Bank, IMF, CORPORATE, CBN FUNDS –  NECESSARY to bring IRREVERSABLE POSITIVE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE to Nigeria’s homes and businesses by 2019. It will take more than all the power Nigeria generates in 10 years to launch the rocket to put a Nigerian in space. Power is more important to Nigerians than an astronaut in space by 2030!

     

    • tonymarinho.com for blog.
  • Niger consumers give condition for embracing electricity tariff hike

    Niger consumers give condition for embracing electricity tariff hike

    Customers of the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company (AEDC) in Niger have said they would embrace electricity tariff hike if they got better services.

    This is contained in a statement issued at the end of the Niger Region AEDC Customer Feedback Tariff Forum issued yesterday in Minna.

    The statement signed by the AEDC Niger Regional Corporate Communications Manager, Alhaji Adamu Muhammad, said that the forum was held in line with the directives from the AEDC management in Abuja. “Nigerlites and the entire citizens of Nigeria should embrace the new tariff regime to further strengthen the destined success of the power privatisation.

    “This same sacrifice was made before the full benefit of the telecommunications sector privatisation started impacting on the lives of the people and the economy.

    “From the Customer Feedback Forum, it is evident that in Niger State, electricity customers are willing to pay the new tariff so long as there is excellent service which mirrors the AEDC strategic direction in the overall customer service.”

    The statement added that the customer resolution was based on the company’s assurance of delivering excellent service to its customers in the region.

    The communique stated that The Customer Feedback Forum held in all the region’s business units was designed to restore the supremacy of the customer in the chain of service delivery.

    At the event, AEDC Regional Chief Executive, Dr Habeeb Quadri, stressed the need for more sacrifice in order to fully enjoy the benefit of tariff increase through qualitative electricity supply.

    Similarly, a training was held for the staff on the new tariff which was aimed at properly re-orienting all AEDC Niger Region workers, most especially the Customer Service Representatives.

    The staff training dwelled on the seamless implementation of the new tariff and requirement for an excellent customer relationship management.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the training was organised in collaboration with the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC). (NAN)

  • Ekiti Teaching Hospital targets 24-hour electricity

    The Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital (EKSUTH),  will soon start enjoying a 24-hour electricity, its Chief Medical Director (CMD), Dr Kolawole Ogundipe, has said.

    Ogundipe told reporters in Ado Ekiti that solar power plant and medical gas plants were in the works to make the dream a reality.

    When the two projects come on stream, they will help reduce overhead costs on electricity, he said.

    Ogundipe said his administration had also secured approval for the ugrade of the Radiology Centre to provide CT scan and endoscopy.

    According to him, the step became necessary to halt the suffering of patients being referred outside the hospital in need of such services.

    He said: “On daily basis, three to four patients are being referred outside the hospital to other centres where they have these scan. Some of them will pay as much as this scan on transportation where they are going to.

    “When we have these facilities here, it will reduce the burden on patients and it will help the personnel to timely treat their patients and it will be beneficial to everybody.”

    Ogundipe explained that approval has also been secured from the state government to upgrade the mortuary to a status befitting a teaching hospital. The present mortuary facilities had been in use since the hospital was established as a district hospital before it was later upgraded to a general hospital.

    He added that EKSUTH Maternity Complex will be expanded to provide better and more quality maternal and child health services.

    Ogundipe noted that EKSUTH received 14 accreditation bodies last year which accredited many departments attesting to quality of the services rendered in the hospital.

    The CMD expressed satisfaction that the Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) has increased tremendously, noting that this has helped the hospital to reduce its debt burden from N416 million as at 31st July, 2013 to N62 million as at 31st December 2015.

    Ogundipe added: “Our staff members are now more committed to our IGR drive because they know that they have roles to play in generating revenue. There is high degree of competition among the staff.

    “People hitherto unable to access training are now being sponsored for further trainings and this will encourage them to do more for the system. “Significantly the management and the unions have been working together in a very cordial way to ensure that labour issues are resolved without degenerating to strikes that can impact negatively on the hospital.”

  • 70% of electricity consumers not metered, says Amadi

    • As MAN, SERAP kick against 45% tariff increase

    About 70 per cent of electricity consumers are not metered. This has hampered accurate billing by Electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOs), the immediate past chairman Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Dr. Sam Amadi, has said.

    He said the DISCOs were given 18 months ultimatum to meter all consumers, but only achieved 10 per cent  at the end of the period. He, however, said NERCdeveloped another framework to ensure that electricity consumers are metered at the end of the period tagged: ‘Credited Advance Payment Metering Implementation (CAPMI).’

    Amadi, who spoke in Lagos during the week, while reacting to the recent tariff increase, said the idea was to allow willing customers advance a particular company with funds for the purchase and installation of meters for their premises. This means that a customer pays for the cost of the meter up front, while the cost of the meter shall subsequently be refunded through a rebate on the fixed charge element of their electricity bills.

    Amadi, however, said in the mean time, estimated bills are still being used to ensure that between 50 and 70 per cent of electricity consumers are not disconnected before the metering processes are completed. He, however, explained the implication of the new tariff regime, noting that tariff allows for more investments in the industry.

    Explaining the parameters used in arriving at the tariff, he noted that the cost of generation and transmission are principally considered with the effect of inflation and exchange rate variations all of which are factored in.

    Amadi gave three reasons for poor supply of electricity as supply, metering and tariff problems, noting that electricity in the country has been hovering around 4000-MW per day, which is meagre compared to the huge population and industrial concentration in the country.

    Factors responsible for the poor electricity supply, he said, include but not limited to the shortage of gas, which is as a result of poor planning, lack of funds for DISCOs to pay for gas, poor prices of gas that does not add incentive to electricity generation and the location of generating plants far away from the gas bearing regions due to poor planning.

    Others are non-readiness of some generating plants, pipeline vandalism, legacy of debt before privatisation and project management, contracting and execution challenges.

    But the Manufacturing Association of Nigeria (MAN) is not impressed with all the reasons given for the tariff increase. MAN President, Dr. Frank Udemba Jacobs, said the tariff hike came despite investigation carried out by the association on their electricity consumption, which showed manufacturers on the average expend N73.12 million on alternative sources of energy monthly.

    “The share of energy cost to total cost of production in the sector is about 40 per cent,” Jacobs lamented, saying that the association is against all manners of tariff increase until their suit in court against NERC is settled. He said anything done in the contrary is prejudicial to the subsisting case.

    Also, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has advised the Minister of Power, Works and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, to “ensure that regulatory authorities are not allowed to get away with the 45 per cent increase in electricity tariff by promoting compliance with the November 2013 ruling on the matter by two United Nations (UN) special rapporteurs.

    SERAP’s advice followed a nationwide protest by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC) against the increase in electricity tariffs, demanding an immediate reversal of the hike.

    A statement by SERAP Executive Director, Adetokunbo Mumuni, said Nigeria is an important member of the UN and has voluntarily accepted its Charter and treaties, adding that any effort to increase electricity tariffs should be guided by recommendations and dialogue with organised labour and other stakeholders.

    The organisation noted that the UN published the Joint Letter of Concern sent to the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan where it expressed concerns that access to electricity and regular supply is a significant problem in Nigeria and that it raised eight questions for the government to answer within 60 days.

    The letter, dated November 26, 2013 and signed by two special rapporteurs, expressed concerns that at the end of 2012, Nigeria with a population of about 160 million people only generated about 4,000 megawatts of electricity, which is 10 times less than some other countries in the region with less population.

    The UN special rapporteurs argued that the beneficiaries of the right to adequate housing should have sustainable access to energy for cooking, heating and lighting, adding that the failure of states to provide basic services such as electricity is a violation of the right to health.

    The rapporteurs, Ms. Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona, Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, and Ms. Raquel Rolnik, Special Rapporteur on adequate housing, sent the letter following a petition by a coalition of human rights activists, labour, journalists and lawyers led by SERAP.

    The petition alleged that increase in electricity tariff would have detrimental impact on the human rights of those living in poverty in the country.

    The special rapporteurs wanted answers to the following questions: “Are the facts alleged by SERAP and others accurate? What kind of impact assessments were conducted to gauge the potential impact of the electricity tariff increases on the human rights of people living in extreme poverty in Nigeria?

    The special rapporteurs further said: “If so, provide details, did public consultations take place, including with potentially affected persons and, especially people living in extreme poverty? If yes, please give details of the dates, participants and outcomes of the consultations.”

    Other questions raised are: “Was accessible and culturally adequate information about the measure actively disseminated through all available channels prior to consultation? What measures have been put in place to ensure that the human rights of people living in extreme poverty in Nigeria will not be undermined by the increase in electricity tariff?”

  • NLC, TUC to shut down DISCOS on Monday

    NLC, TUC to shut down DISCOS on Monday

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria are to commence a mass action against the recent 45 percent increase in electricity tariff by the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission across the country on Monday.
    The NLC said that the mass action which is expected to hold in the 36 states and Abuja will see the Congress and their civil society allies picketing Electricity Distribution companies.
    The union said “our members have been sufficiently mobilized and are ready to go. If you are an electricity consumer and you are not happy with the bills electricity companies serve you every month, you are invited to join this protest rally.
    “The Abuja rally will start at Labour House, Central Business District at 8.00am before moving to the NERC head office at Adamawa Plaza, Plot 1099, First Avenue, Off Shehu Shagari Way, Central Business District. From the NERC office, the rally will roll to the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company at Zone 4. The rally will mobilise from there to the National Assembly”
    Meanwhile, the National Union of Textile Garment and Tailoring Workers of Nigeria (NUTGTWN) wants President Muhammadu Buhari to immediately review the power sector reform embarked upon by the previous government with a view to increasing public sector involvement.
    General Secretary of the Union, Comrade Issa Aremu who made the call in a statement in Abuja said the promise by the government to revive textile industries in the country will not be possible without improved power supply.
    Aremu who said the union was fully in support of the planned picketing by labour and their civil society allies of all offices of the electricity distribution companies (DISCOS) nationwide including Abuja on Monday said the government should listen to suggestions of power sector unions on the issue.