Tag: Emirship tussle

A Federal High Court on Thursday, ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear the human rights violation case filed by the dethroned Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado Bayero, and senior councillor, Aminu Dan’agundi.

Justice A M Liman, of a Federal High Court in Kano, said the court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the case instituted by  Dan’agundi, against the implementation of Kano Emirate Council (Repeal) Law 2024.

 Dan’agundi,(Sarkin Dawaki Babba), through his counsel, Ibrahim Aliyu-Nasarawa, filed a motion exparte dated May 23.

The applicant is seeking the court to restrain the respondents from enforcing, implementing and operationalizing the Kano State Emirate repeal law and reinstating Emir Muhammad Sanusi II.

The respondents in the suit are the  Kano State Government, Kano State House of Assembly, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly, Attorney-General of Kano State and  Commissioner of Police Kano.

Others are the Inspector-General of Police, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and the Department of State Security Service.

Justice Liman, in a ruling held that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the matter bothering on the applicant’s fundamental rights relying on section 42  (1) and Section 315 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

Read Also: BREAKING: NJC summons FHC CJ, Kano CJ over conflicting orders on Emirship tussle

He adjourned the matter until June 14, for hearing of all pending application.

Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Mr M S Waziri, argued that the court has jurisdiction to entertain and hear the fundamental right suit to fair hearing.

“The applicant ought to have been involved as a member of the Kano State Kingmakers in reinstating the new emir of Kano”

Counsel to the Kano State Government and Attorney-General of Kano, Mahmoud Abubakar-Magaji, SAN, urged the court to decline jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

NAN reports that the court had on May 23, granted an Interim Injunction order directing parties to maintain status quo ante,the passage and assent of the bill pending the hearing of the Fundamental Rights application.

The court also restrained the 5th to 8th respondents from enforcing, executing, implementing and operationalizing the Kano State Emirate Council (Repeal) Law 2024.

NAN reports that Gov. Abba Kabir-Yusuf, on May 23, dethroned Emir Aminu Ado-Bayero, and reappointed Sanusi II, as the Emir of Kano, four years after he was dethroned by former Governor Abdullahi Ganduje.

(NAN)

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and lawyer to the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, M.J. Numa, has asked the deputy governor of Kano state, Aminu Abdussalam, to provide “irrefutable evidence to substantiate his claim, within 24 hours, that he (Ribadu) provided the aircraft that conveyed the dethroned Emir, Alhaji Aminu Ado Bayero, back to Kano, and “the intent is to kill and destroy properties because they are not from Kano.”

The deputy governor had, in a brief interview at the Emir’s Palace in Gidan Rumfa, accused the NSA of assisting the deposed Emir to return to the ancient city last week Sunday.

Numa in a letter dated 27th May 2024, and obtained by The Nation, asked the deputy governor to retract the “libellous allegation in a similar manner it was made, give it wide media circulation, and issue a public apology in five national dailies with wide national coverage and on popular online platforms.”

He said failure to comply with demands would compel his client to seek legal redress before the appropriate forum.

Read Also: Yahaya Bello vs EFCC: Northern groups visit Lamido of Adamawa, Zulum, seek Tinubu’s intervention

The letter read in part: “The attention of our client was drawn to a video clip being shared on different social media platforms wherein you granted an interview at Emir’s Palace in Kano on Saturday, the 25th day of May 2024, in a very calm atmosphere, and without any provocation whatsoever, falsely accusing our client of using his office to kill the people of Kano State and maim their properties.

“In the clip, you were shown to be saying in Hausa (translated): “The former governor Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, is not happy with the peace and understanding being enjoyed in Kano and is using the office of the National Security Adviser to deploy security personnel to subvert the will of Kano people and to bring something the people don’t like.

“The National Security Adviser has provided two planes to bring the former Emir to Kano. What we failed to understand is the reason behind his actions. The intent is to kill and destroy properties because they are not from Kano?”

“Your false accusations against our client portraying his office as an appendage of a political party and a willing tool to cause chaos in Kano is false and done with the intention of damaging the hard-earned reputation of our client in the eyes of the right-thinking members of the society and indeed it has succeeded in doing so.

“For the avoidance of doubt, our client is not in any way using his office for any political purpose. Our client was also not responsible for providing the plane that brought His Highness, Emir Aminu Ado Bayero to Kano.

“You have without any justification ridiculed the exalted office of the National Security Adviser, which our client occupies, by portraying it as a ready tool to be used by politicians to achieve political goals. You have also ridiculed the personality of our client who has built a reputation as a principled and honest citizen in both his public and private life.”

Numa said Ribadu who was the pioneer Executive Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), had, in all the places he has served never been accused of any wrongdoing.

“Given this illustrious background, it is inconceivable that someone would harbour the thought that our client would descend his exalted office so low as to interfere in the local tussle of the Kano Emirate,” he said.

“Our client and his office take your allegations seriously and by this letter, our client is demanding that you provide irrefutable evidence to substantiate your claims. If you have no proof, our client demands you to within 24 hours: retract the libellous allegation in a similar manner you made it as well as give it wide media circulation; and issue a public apology in five National dailies with wide national coverage and on popular online platforms.

“Kindly be advised that your failure to comply with this modest demand will compel our client to seek legal redress before the appropriate forum, irrespective of the immunity status you currently enjoy by virtue of your position as the Deputy Governor of Kano state.”