Tag: Enang

  • Senate: Attempt to declare Saraki, Abe’s seats vacant fails

    Senate: Attempt to declare Saraki, Abe’s seats vacant fails

    Attempts to declare the seats of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Senators who defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC) vacant failed on Wednesday in the Senate.

    Senator Ita Enang (Akwa Ibom North East) through a Point of Order, asked the Senate President to declare the seats of 11 PDP Senators who wrote the Senate to announce their defection to the APC vacant.

    Enang, Chairman, Senate Committee on Rules and Business, laboured to convince the Senate President, David Mark, about the need to declare the seats of the affected Senators vacant.

    Senators Enang wanted to vacate their seats in the upper chamber included Abubakar Bukola Saraki, (Kwara Central), Magnus Abe, (Rivers South East), Abdullahi Adamu (Nasarawa West), Wilson Ake (Rivers West), and Aisha Jumai Al-Hassan.

    The five Senators openly declared for the APC on the floor of the upper chamber on Tuesday.

    Like a rehearsed motion, Enang urged Mark to invoke the powers conferred on him as the Senate President to declare the seats of the defectors vacant.

    A competent source told our correspondent that the resolution to ask Mark to declare the seats of the defectors vacant was taken at the PDP Senators caucus meeting on Tuesday.

    The caucus meeting was summoned after five Senators of the ruling party openly announced their defection to the APC on Tuesday.

    The source who pleaded not to be named said that the threat to declare the seat of the affected Senators vacant was a ploy to intimidate them into dropping their defection bid.

    Enang said, “Yesterday (Tuesday) Senators Abubakar Saraki, Abdullahi Adamu, Aisha Alhassan, Magnus Abe and Wilson Ake declared on the floor of the Senate that they are no more in the PDP.

    “This is the party that sponsored them to the Senate. This is the party that owns the seats that they are sitting on.

    Mr. President I have two judgments of the court to present before this distinguished Senate to show that the seats of Senators Saraki, Aisha Alhassan, Abdullahi Adamu, Magnus Abe and Wilson Ake are vacant on the floor of the Senate and they are strangers on the floor of the Senate.”

    Before Enang could conclude his argument there was uproar in the chamber.

    When the uproar subsided, Mark gave Enang the floor once again.

    Enang continued, “I have the judgment of Justice E.S. Chukwu delivered on the 18th of October, 2013 between the PDP versus INEC, Abubakar Baraje, Olagunsoye Oyinlola and others which had declared that there is no division in the Peoples Democratic Party.”

    Another session of uproar by Senators ensued but Enang was unperturbed.

     

     

  • Planned defection of 22 PDP senators to APC  Senate disowns panel chair Enang

    Planned defection of 22 PDP senators to APC Senate disowns panel chair Enang

    The leadership of the Senate yesterday told the Chairman of its Committee on Rules and Business, Chief Ita Enang, that he went beyond his brief in threatening the 22 PDP Senators said to be on their way to the All Progressives Congress (APC) with sack from the chamber.

    Several other Senators said Enang got it all wrong on the matter.

    Senator Enang had, at a press conference in Abuja on Thursday, vowed that the 22 Senators would automatically lose their seats and be escorted out of the chamber once they formally announce their defection.

    The Chairman, Senate Committee on Information, Media and Public Affairs, Chief Enyinnaya Abaribe, dismissed Enang’s statement as strictly his “personal opinion”.

    Abaribe said while Enang is entitled to his opinion,it should not be mistaken as the Senate’s.

    The statement, he added ,also has nothing to do with the President of the Senate who had, in an earlier statement,said that the leadership of the PDP would work to keep the PDP intact and prevent further crisis in within its fold.

    Abaribe said that the chamber is still on recess and that only after deliberations upon its resumption on January 14 “ would any statement on urgent matters of state be issued.”

    He added:”It is, therefore, preposterous to attribute the personal opinion of a Senator to represent the resolution of the Senate and its highly respected leadership as exemplified by Senate President Mark.

    “Senate position as statutory is always relayed by its spokesman in which case it becomes safe to say that Senate has spoken.”

    The Senate,he pointed out, is at peace and there is nothing to suggest that its members are working at cross purposes .

    “It is one whole family of patriotic Nigerians who first and foremost defers to issues that are of national interest.

    “The Senate, as currently constituted, is peopled by very distinguished Nigerians who see the institution for what it is; a hallowed chamber whose decisions and resolutions are shaped by honour and love for country”, he said.

    In his reaction, the Vice Chairman, Senate Committee on Education,Chief Olusola Adeyeye, described Enang’s postulations as a “blackmail.”

    Adeyeye said Enang spoke without the mandate of the Senate and, therefore, was speaking for himself and that nobody can “detract or subtract from the constitutional rights of Nigerians to freedom of association.”

    Adeyeye said:”Senator Ita Enang would do well not to arrogate powers which he does not have to himself.

    “On this matter, Senator Ita Enang is speaking for himself. He does not even have the mandate to speak for the entire Senate on this matter. We want to make it clear that Senators would make their opinions known when they resume from the Yuletide break next week.

    “The National Assembly should be the foundation of freedom in this country. It is supposed to guarantee the freedom of Nigerians, subject, of course, to the rights of the constituents of lawmaker, if he’s not following the dictates of his people.

    “We warn those attempting to blackmail lawmakers that that tactic will backfire. Legislators should be free to stand by their conscience without any threat of blackmail. The laws of the land are clear on movement from one party to another and nobody should assume a position of authority he does not hold.”

    Adeyeye further wondered why Enang, who has been in the National Assembly since 1999 ,has never voiced any opinion when members defected from other parties to the PDP.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Drugs, Narcotics and Financial Crimes, Senator Victor Lar, also faulted Enang, saying the declaration of any lawmaker’s seat vacant can only be ordered by a court of law.

    He said:”This is a time when healing of those aggrieved within the PDP is required.”

    Senator Enang had argued that electoral positions are contested on party basis and not on individual basis.

    Enang had said: “The party is sovereign and if one is not granted the ticket by his party, the political ambition of the person suffers a setback.

    “Therefore, when legislators are elected into the National Assembly, they are voted in on the basis of the political party to which they belong and not on individual grounds.”

    Five governors and 37 members of the House of Representatives and 27 members of the Sokoto House of Assembly and other PDP leaders across the country have already dumped the party for the APC.

  • Planned defection of 22 PDP senators to APC  Senate disowns panel chair Enang

    Planned defection of 22 PDP senators to APC Senate disowns panel chair Enang

    The leadership of the Senate yesterday told the Chairman of its Committee on Rules and Business, Chief Ita Enang, that he went beyond his brief in threatening the 22 PDP Senators said to be on their way to the All Progressives Congress (APC) with sack from the chamber.

    Several other Senators said Enang got it all wrong on the matter.

    Senator Enang had, at a press conference in Abuja on Thursday, vowed that the 22 Senators would automatically lose their seats and be escorted out of the chamber once they formally announce their defection.

    The Chairman, Senate Committee on Information, Media and Public Affairs, Chief Enyinnaya Abaribe, dismissed Enang’s statement as strictly his “personal opinion”.

    Abaribe said while Enang is entitled to his opinion,it should not be mistaken as the Senate’s.

    The statement, he added ,also has nothing to do with the President of the Senate who had, in an earlier statement,said that the leadership of the PDP would work to keep the PDP intact and prevent further crisis in within its fold.

    Abaribe said that the chamber is still on recess and that only after deliberations upon its resumption on January 14 “ would any statement on urgent matters of state be issued.”

    He added:”It is, therefore, preposterous to attribute the personal opinion of a Senator to represent the resolution of the Senate and its highly respected leadership as exemplified by Senate President Mark.

    “Senate position as statutory is always relayed by its spokesman in which case it becomes safe to say that Senate has spoken.”

    The Senate,he pointed out, is at peace and there is nothing to suggest that its members are working at cross purposes .

    “It is one whole family of patriotic Nigerians who first and foremost defers to issues that are of national interest.

    “The Senate, as currently constituted, is peopled by very distinguished Nigerians who see the institution for what it is; a hallowed chamber whose decisions and resolutions are shaped by honour and love for country”, he said.

    In his reaction, the Vice Chairman, Senate Committee on Education,Chief Olusola Adeyeye, described Enang’s postulations as a “blackmail.”

    Adeyeye said Enang spoke without the mandate of the Senate and, therefore, was speaking for himself and that nobody can “detract or subtract from the constitutional rights of Nigerians to freedom of association.”

    Adeyeye said:”Senator Ita Enang would do well not to arrogate powers which he does not have to himself.

    “On this matter, Senator Ita Enang is speaking for himself. He does not even have the mandate to speak for the entire Senate on this matter. We want to make it clear that Senators would make their opinions known when they resume from the Yuletide break next week.

    “The National Assembly should be the foundation of freedom in this country. It is supposed to guarantee the freedom of Nigerians, subject, of course, to the rights of the constituents of lawmaker, if he’s not following the dictates of his people.

    “We warn those attempting to blackmail lawmakers that that tactic will backfire. Legislators should be free to stand by their conscience without any threat of blackmail. The laws of the land are clear on movement from one party to another and nobody should assume a position of authority he does not hold.”

    Adeyeye further wondered why Enang, who has been in the National Assembly since 1999 ,has never voiced any opinion when members defected from other parties to the PDP.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Drugs, Narcotics and Financial Crimes, Senator Victor Lar, also faulted Enang, saying the declaration of any lawmaker’s seat vacant can only be ordered by a court of law.

    He said:”This is a time when healing of those aggrieved within the PDP is required.”

    Senator Enang had argued that electoral positions are contested on party basis and not on individual basis.

    Enang had said: “The party is sovereign and if one is not granted the ticket by his party, the political ambition of the person suffers a setback.

    “Therefore, when legislators are elected into the National Assembly, they are voted in on the basis of the political party to which they belong and not on individual grounds.”

    Five governors and 37 members of the House of Representatives and 27 members of the Sokoto House of Assembly and other PDP leaders across the country have already dumped the party for the APC.

  • Still on Senator Enang’s lie with statistics

    Still on Senator Enang’s lie with statistics

    The power of propaganda, as an aphorism goes, lies less in its systematic and deceptive distortion of the truth than in the willingness of people, generally speaking, to be lied to. This willingness to be deceived is possibly the only, certainly the best, explanation of how many otherwise knowledgeable individuals, institutions and pundits in the country swallowed Senator Solomon Ita Enang’s recent mendacity on the sacred floor of the Senate that Northerners controlled 83% of the country’s oil wells, hook, line and sinker.

    Predictably, my column to that effect last week drew a lot of flack. Of the 47 texts and the odd email or two I received in reaction, the vast majority supported the senator. Several, including one from +2348183916532, warned me not to “insult our senator for revealing the truth to Nigerians.”

    Another from a reader, who simply called himself Godfrey (+2348076823815), quoting Thomas Carlyle’s words about every man having a coward and a hero in his soul, described the senator as “a man who has a hero in his soul.” He then proceeded to give me some words of advice on how one should “learn how to accept the truth, no matter how bitter.”

    Another reader, Ubong Joseph, texting from +2348023262979, was less charitable. “Mr. Mohammed Haruna,” he said, “l’ve just finished reading your piece on Senator lta Enang’s submission on ownership of 83% of Nigerian oil blocks by your brothers and your comments is yet an indication that as a typical Northerner the “Food is Ready” and “Share the Money” syndrome of the North must be maintain(ed) indefinitely by your Northern Cabal. For actions and comments like this, may the soul of Lord Lugard never, never Rest in Peace for that forceful Amalgamation in l9l4.”

    Elsewhere much of the reactions to the senator’s claim have been no less supportive than those of the three above. One of the most interesting, I believe, came from “General” Ateke Tom – yes, he of the war-lord fame from the Niger Delta. The reader, I am sure, can readily recall that only last August, the respected New York Wall Street Journal, published a damning article which exposed how he, along with four other former war-lords, received the princely sum of $40 million a year from the Presidency, ostensibly to stop oil theft in the region. Ateke Tom’s share of the fees, the newspaper said, was $3.8 million.

    The scandal, obviously, was not just that the payments were under the table. Worse, no services were ever delivered in return; oil experts have said there have been more oil thefts in recent years than at any time before these payments of what was clearly protection money to the ex war-lords.

    In a full page advert in Thisday of March 11, “General” Tom, writing as “Leader” of IZON IKEMI which he described as “a nascent group of concerned Nigerians drawn from the Ijaw speaking states of the Niger Delta,” praised Senator Enang for his “patriotism” in exposing the way the villainous Northerners have cornered the oil wealth that did not belong to them.

    IZON IKEMI, he said, “heartily commends the patriotism of Senator Ita Enang… for exposing the deceit in the oil sector of our nation.”

    Senator Enang may be a hero and a patriot for many in making his claim, but anyone who really cared for the truth would never have needed more than to merely scratch the surface to see that his claim was anything but the truth.

    The simplest way to get the most authentic facts is to get the oil authorities, specifically the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), to publish the list of all the oil wells we have in this country and their ownership. If I want to prove the senator wrong, one reader said quite sensibly, I should get my facts and publish it.

    Well, I tried ahead of today’s column and made little headway; Dr Omar Farouk, a spokesman of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) said his department didn’t have the figures and directed me to the DPR. I called the director, Mr Osten Olorunsola, several times on the 14th of this month and got no response. I then sent him a text identifying myself and requesting for the list. I was yet to hear from him as at the time of this writing. And I wasn’t really surprised; a mutual friend, who is an expert in the oil business, had asked for the same information and was refused.

    However, even without DPR publishing the list there has been sufficient information in the public domain for any sensible person to see through our senator’s mendacity. For example, back in 2007, Mr. Basil Ominyi, then Chief Executive Officer of Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, by far the country’s biggest oil producer, told Corporate Nigeria, an annual guide for business, trade and investment in the country partly sponsored by NNPC, that his company produced over 40% of Nigeria’s oil and supplied 75% of its commercial gas. He also claimed that the company’s mining area of 31,000 square kilometres “contained more than half of Nigeria’s oil and gas reserves.”

    In the same interview, he pointed out that NNPC’s joint venture with his company, along with similar ventures with ExxonMobil,ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips – all three from the U.S. – Eni from Italy and Total SA from France, accounted for nearly 95% of Nigeria’s oil production. The ownership structure of all six joint ventures is between 55 and 60% in favour of NNPC. In terms of management control, Northern presence in all six is virtually nil, or at best marginal.

    Commonsense – which, alas, seems so uncommon in our essentially malicious politics – should instruct us that the dominance of our oil industry by the giant oil multinationals has left less than 10% for ownership by our local oil companies. Anyone who imagines that Northerners controlled 83% of this leftover from the Big Boys need only refer to the list of the indigenous oil companies and their owners which Olusegun Adeniyi, the authoritative and well-informed Thursday columnist of Thisday and the chairman of its editorial board, published last week, to see that his imagination is precise only that – imagination, and a wild one at that.

    Before Segun, Government, an in-depth investigative weekly publication in the stable of Leadership newspapers which looks like a cross between a Sunday newspaper and a newsmagazine, had published a three-page list of all the actors in the oil business, including the multinationals, the local companies, the service companies and the drillers, etc, in its edition of February 4. Even the most casual examination of the lists in the two newspapers will give the lie to our senator’s claim of the ownership structure of the country’s oil wells.

    The motive for that lie is obvious, or should be, to any reasonable observer of our politics; divert the public’s attention from the bigger culprits for the short, nasty and brutish lives of the hapless people of the oil producing Niger Delta. And the bigger culprits are no other than the leaders of the region themselves, including, of course, our distinguished senator and the ex war-lords of the region like Ateke Tom, who have been living it off in Abuja and other big cities of the country since the declaration of amnesty for the region’s militants several years ago.

    Few Nigerians have captured the level of culpability of the region’s elite for its woes than, first, Chief Edwin Clark, the self-declared leader of the region, and second, Chief James Ibori, the jailed ex-governor of Delta State.

    More than five years ago, Chief Clark told The Nation (August 11, 2007) that the governors of the region were the most corrupt in the country. “Nigerians,” he said, “are worried why the recent activities of EFFC resulting in the arrest and trial of certain governors in the country have not affected the former governors of the Niger Delta who were known all over the country and the world as the most corrupt and investigated governors by the EFFC.”

    Long before Chief Clark, the jailed Chief Ibori provided probably the biggest insight into the cause of the Niger Delta’s predicament of poverty in oil riches. Lamenting the self-exile in far-awayAustralia of Dr. Eric Opia as the fugitive boss of OMPADEC, the precursor of NDDC, the governor told the since rested Post Express (July 11, 2001) “Our son Opia is on the run today. Those that stole OMPADEC money are still walking the streets. Those that ate OMPADEC money are not from the Niger Delta. If Opia took money actually and embezzled it, yes he is our son. The money is still within the region.”

    Clearly, it is this inexplicable attitude among the likes of Chief Ibori that only those from the Niger Delta should be free to steal the region blind, and not any perceived control of the region’s oil wealth by outsiders, which is the principal source of the region’s predicament.

    Those who all too readily jumped at Senator Enang’s blatant mendacity to blame outsiders for the problems of the Niger Delta should be honest enough to accept that scapegoating others is no solution to those problems.

     

  • Unacceptable lopsidedness

    Unacceptable lopsidedness

    DELIBERATIONS on the contentious Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) on the floor of the Senate last week confirmed, once again, the appalling lack of transparency, accountability, justice and equity that has continued to hobble the oil sector, which is the mainstay of the Nigerian economy. Even though the Bill eventually smoothly scaled the Second Reading and proceeded to the committee stage on Thursday, this was not before some very shocking revelations during the debate on Wednesday as regards the lopsidedness in the ownership of oil blocs in the Niger Delta.

    Before the dramatic turn of events following the disclosure on the oil blocs, the debate had assumed a North-South dichotomy among the senators. It was not surprising that northern senators vehemently opposed key sections of the PIB, particularly the provision for the allocation of 10 per cent net profit of oil companies operating in the Niger Delta, to host communities. Like other members of the northern political elite who had persistently voiced their opinion on the matter, the senators were not convinced by the argument that the host communities deserved to be compensated for the gross devastation of their environment, livelihood and even health in the process of prospecting for oil.

    The standard argument from the north has been that the Niger Delta is already being overcompensated through the 13 percent derivation fund it receives, as well as the establishment of the Ministry of the Niger Delta and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NNDC).

    Chairman of the Senate Committee on Rules and Business, Senator Ita Enang, however, introduced a major twist to the debate on Tuesday when he disclosed that northerners control 83 percent of oil blocs in the country. Urged by the Senate President, David Mark, to buttress his allegation with facts, Senator Enang reeled out names of beneficiaries of oil bloc allocations, their companies and the oil fields they control. His facts have not been controverted since then.

    Those named as owners and operators of the oil blocs include Alhaji Mai Deribe from Borno State, owner of Cavendish Petroleum that operates OML 110; Mallam Sanusi Lamido from Kano, a major shareholder and director of Seplatform Petroleum that operates ASUOKPUJUMTU marginal field; General Theophilus Danjuma whose South African Petroleum Limited (SAPETRO) controls OPL 246 in partnership with Total Upstream Nigeria Limited and Brasoil Oil Services Company Nigeria Limited and Alhaji Sani Bello of Kontagora, Niger State, who operates OML 112 and OML 117 through his AMNI International Petroleum and Development Company.

    Others are Alhaji Indimi of Oriental Energy Resources Limited that operates OML 115 as well as the Oduok and Ebok fields; former Petroleum Minister and OPEC Chairman, Alhaji Rilwan Lukman who manages AMNI oil blocs. Others include Alhaji Aminu Dantata who operates OML 108 through Express Petroleum and Gas Limited as well as the trio of Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Alhaji Umaru Yar’Adua and Alhaji Ado Bayero who own INTEL Oil Services with substantial stakes in Nigeria’s oil exploration in Sao Tome and Principe. Some of the non- northerners in the industry include Mike Adenuga, Emeka Offor and Yinka Folawiyo.

    It is ironical that the north, whose leaders have vehemently opposed the demand by the Niger Delta for a more just share of oil revenues, actually controls the bulk of the region’s oil business. Many of these companies reportedly make more profit from their oil blocs than the PIB seeks to pay host communities as compensation.

    The Senate should not sweep this issue under the carpet. It should demand full details of oil bloc allocations and take corrective measures to ensure fairness and balance. We do not even know why the oil blocs would be allocated to individuals, with many of them not having the capacity to utilise them optimally. All these underscore the urgent need to pass the PIB that will ensure transparency in the sector and prevent the kind of abuses responsible for the current lopsidedness in the allocation of oil blocs.