Tag: EU

  • Boko Haram: FG, World Bank, others end mission to Northeast

    The Federal Government, the World Bank, European Union, and the United Nations have concluded a two-week recovery and assessment mission in the Northeast region ravaged by Boko Haram insurgency.

    The mission was part of ongoing Recovery and Peace Building Assessment (RPBA) programme initiated by the global agencies.

    Led by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), Dr. Mariam Masha, the recovery and assessment team visited Adamawa, Taraba, Gombe, Bauchi, Borno and Yobe States.

    A statement issued by the Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity to the Vice President, Laolu Akande, said during the visits, the team actively engaged with state governors, decision-makers as well as top government functionaries, civil society organizations, private sector players, traditional rulers, the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), emergency management agencies, humanitarian and relief agencies and other active partners in the recovery efforts in the affected states.

    The statement said: “In the course of the tour in the affected areas, the team of officials visited several camps and resettlement centres for the IDPs in the different states as well as insurgency –ravaged public institutions like hospitals, markets and military formations.

    “The team also gained first hand knowledge of human and physical conditions in the camps and resettlement centres affording them the opportunity to empathize with the people and also reassured them of the commitment of the Buhari administration towards addressing their challenges.

    “In furtherance of the importance of the recovery and assessment mission, the team’s top level engagements with relevant stakeholders centred on sector recovery and needs assessment strategy in the three major components of Infrastructure and social services, peace building, stability and social cohesion as well as the economic recovery of the affected people in the six states.”

  • EU backs  anti-graft war

    EU backs anti-graft war

    The European Union (EU) delegation to Nigeria has said it is backing the nation’s anti-graft war.

    Head of the EU delegation Ambassador Michel Arrion noted that the Muhammadu Buhari administration had made progress in cleaning the oil sector.

    Arrion said EU would support the anti-graft war with €35 million.

    He urged Nigerians to give the government time to execute its programmes, stressing that it takes time to turn things around.

    Arrion said: “I think they have made  progress in the fight against corruption, particularly in the oil and you have seen in the two most visible domain of corruption, which is oil and the military.

    “They have cleansed the place. They have changed the security chiefs and governance in oil sector. I think those are key things. Of course in the oil sector it can have impact on the economy.

    “But again, I think they are addressing issues in the economy but it takes time.

    “I know also that the new change of administration has created expectations, people are just counting weeks and months since the inauguration of the President. They have become impatient but I think we must explain and insist on the fact that those things take time to re-launch the economy and you have external factors. You don’t change the direction of a big ship just like that. It takes time.

    “ So the big boat called Nigeria will need time to diversify. People want to industrailise, it takes three years to build industry. You see people are extremely impatient for electricity but it takes months and years. It is not because you do not see it does not exist, but I know that this government is working on a lot of things and rapidly that are not visible.

    “For instance on the question of electricity, you have heard the declaration of Minister of Works, Housing and Power, Babatunde Fashola explaining that he does not want to put an end to contracts that have been signed by the last administration, he just want to improve the terms of the contracts because he knows that they have probably been badly negotiated,” he said.

  • World Bank, EU, FG pledge support for Edo post-Oshiomhole

    World Bank, EU, FG pledge support for Edo post-Oshiomhole

    There is a combination of multi-sectoral, multi-skill, and multi-competence team from the World Bank, European Union and the Federal Ministry of Budget and National Planning Commission in Edo State whose mission seems a good omen for the entire citizens, post Adams Oshiomhole’s tenure in November 12, 2016.

    This powerful team arrive the modern ancient city on Tuesday, with the intent to appreciate the State Government for the employment generated under State Employment and Expenditure for Results (SEEFOR) and to plead for continuity in poverty reduction policies and financial reforms.

    The team, among others, was in town to plan with Edo State Government officials on the midterm preview of the SEEFOR Project and providing the implementation support.

    Being a midterm review, the leader of the World Bank Representative, Mr. Ismaila Ceesay said, there was need to discuss and get the consensus of the State Government in areas that will require restructuring, if need be.

    Ceesay, who was briefing Governor Adams Oshiomhole during a courtesy call to Government House said, “We have started our mission and it is been a very productive mission so far. The Project Coordinator and his team have demonstrated to us that for all the three components of the projects, there is actually feasible progress in terms of implementation process.”

    Expatiating, he said, “We also look at the fact that since the EU money has not been forth coming but it is going to be available by next month, which is a grant to this government, that the project would require restructuring, not only restructuring for the purpose of accommodating the EU funds but also extending the life of the project by another two years.

    “With this, we are all of the opinion that the present development strides will be delivered in this state and other states that the project seeks to support. Our management is very keen to continue with this support and for us to work with you, not to supervise you but to work with you on implementation support arrangement where if there are weaknesses in any area, we stand by you and support you in resolving those issues.

    “We are not going to work with you as a policeman versus the citizens, we are actually partners in this and that is why we also with the clearance of the EU, we have to agree to put on the mission this time and this time, I am sure you will realise that we have multi-sectoral, multi-skill, multi-competence team that will plan with your various officials in supporting the implementation of this very complex project.

    “The state grant issue which was a critical area of the bank problem under this project has since been resolved and we also understand and have seen some evidence that the state is not only trying to ensure that such an issue does not arise but are also implementing sustainability measures that will allow these projects in terms of outcome of it to continue to realise even when the Bank and the EU are not partnering with you, that is, assuming the project closes in 2017 to be extended again to 2019.

    “We want to reconfirm to you that we the Bank and EU will stand by you in supporting your developmental strides. We have seen the progress that has been achieved in the past two years especially in the area of employment generation and financial management area,” the World Bank official explained.

    Ceesay was not alone; the EU representative, Mr. Yuan Hansla was also on hand to give Edo people some words of hope, courage and support.

    According to him, “We at the EU are very keen to see our additional finance that is going to be incorporated into the project to be finally approved and available by the end of this month to the beginning of next month.”

    Like the good host, Oshiomhole appreciated the team. “We feel quite honoured to have you in Edo State and to see for yourselves and to reconcile what is in the books to what is on ground and I think for me, that is the way it should be,” he said.

    But trust the comrade governor to also seize the opportunity of such occasion to share his ideals and ideas of how things work in Edo State.

    “For us, reforms have been the constant word. When I was in NLC, we talk about revolution but now, we realised that to make state viable and to deliver services more efficiently, we just must have unbending reforms if we like, what appears whether by reasons of changes in technology or the complexity of society and the ever mounting expectations of our people, we need to continue to improve on efficiency in service delivery at minimum cost and maximum output and so we are encouraged.

    “I do the same thing here. I deal with all kind of files and all sort of opinions formed on the basis of well articulated memos from various MDAs but for me, from time to time, and without notice, I like to go and see whether those files and memos elegantly written, well edited, whether what is on ground is just as attractive, because the entry point for the people is in terms of the deliverables which they can see.

    “In this state, and over the period, we have sustained our political conversations around what we termed ‘eye-mark’ and government shouldn’t just claim to have done but people should be witnesses to what government is doing and it must bring the people to bear testimony that those things are actually realised. Unless they can say so, our annual reports are meaningless,” Oshiomhole explained.

  • EU’s 20 million euros for environment

    EU’s 20 million euros for environment

    The European Union (EU) has voted about 20 million Euros to implement environmental and agricultural programmes capable of reducing desertification in the country.

    Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Forestry Officer (Drylands), Department of Forest Assessment, Management and Conservation (FOM), Nora Berrahmouni spoke at the Great Green Wall Regional Workshop on Restoration, Tuesday in Abuja.

    The programme, which extends to five other countries, has 11 frontline

    States in the north as beneficiary.

    The states include Adamawa, Borno, Bauchi, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara.

    About N10 billion was approved in 2013 by previous administration to begin the initiative in the desert encroached states.

    Berrahmouni stated that the project is expected to boost the programme implementation, aimed to check desertification in the affected region.

    The project will be implemented in partnership with the FAO of the United Nations, Federal Government, African Union Commission and the National Agency for Great Green Wall.

    Berrahmouni said the project, “has funding of 20 million euros by EU, involving six countries in Africa, one country in Caribbean and one country in the Pacific.”

    Earlier, Environment Minister of State, Alhaji Ibrahim Jibril challenged participants to be proactive and ensure desert encroachment is reduced to the barest minimum through the GGW.

    Jibril, who emphasised that the nation was at a critical phase of combating land degradation, said the initiative was vital to improving livelihood of the affected people.

    According to him, with a population of 46.6 million people, the affected states could be overwhelmed if urgent measures are not taken.

    “The people living in this region heavily depend on land, water and vegetation resources for their livelihoods which are fast deteriorating as a result of desertification. This progressive deterioration of resources over the years has undermined Nigeria’s efforts in ensuring stable and sustainable development future for the affected population in the 11 frontline states,” Jibrin said.

    The workshop was organized to strengthen technical capacities of GGW member countries towards actualizing vision of the programme.

  • Govt, EU, UNICEF join forces against  gender-based violence

    Govt, EU, UNICEF join forces against gender-based violence

    In the yesteryear, a young girl’s uncle took her to the city. He promised to give her quality education and good home, among other things. The girl and her parents fell for it.

    Contrary to the promises, things turned awry as early as she arrived at her uncle’s home. She immediately became a servant and was subjected to various forms of cruel treatment. She attended school in tears.

    One day, she demanded school fees from her uncle. For this, she received severe beating and was forced to kneel down under the sun.

    She was serving that punishment when a passerby (her uncle’s friend) saw her. Moved with pity, the passerby enquired from her what the matter was. The girl narrated her ordeal to the man who urged her to come to his office for the money.

    Excitedly and relieved, she rushed to see him at the appointed day, only for the man to rape her in his office. He threatened to kill her if she told anyone about it.

    The girl mustered courage and told her uncle. But the he girl, her uncle doubted her, stripped her and kicked her into the streets—naked.

    That was where she met a Good Samaritan and the contact that fulfilled her dreams. Today, she is proudly married and has children.

    But how many of her type are that lucky? What about a man who, after some years of marriage that was blessed with children, decided to take a second wife? One day, an argument ensued between both wives and the second wife poured hot water on her senior colleague.

    Neighbours rushed the woman to the nearest hospital and her assailant to the police. But on their husband’s return, he asked the police to release her and arrest him instead. After securing her bail, he  divorced his first wife while still in hospital.

    In another instance, a father sexually abused his two daughters who were 12 and 14 years old respectively. The older one was courageous enough to open up.

    She opened up to their 20-year-old brother who eventually blew it by taking them to the palace of their traditional ruler for safety.

    These are few examples of the many cases of gender-based violence (GBV) and Violence against Children (VAC) that occur daily.

    Despite the outcry about the increasing incidents of victimisation, a lot more are not publicised.

    It was on this ground that the European Union (EU), United Nations Women, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the Federal Government entered into a partnership towards curbing the trend.

    As part of the activities, the coalition held a one-day workshop with select religious and community leaders and other stakeholders in Gombe State. The workshop aimed at finding solution to the problems of VAC and GBV in various communities. The workshop also aimed at strengthening the commitment of stakeholders in combating the trend by tapping into applicable religious injunctions and practices that discourage VAC and GBV.

    At the forum, resource persons categorised VAC into emotional, physical and sexual. Emotional violence, they said, is ridiculed, talked-down on or put down by parents. Adult caregivers or adult relatives who continually show or tell victims, mostly children, that they were unloved or did not deserve to be loved, or wished they were dead or had never been born.

    Physical violence was defined as physical acts of violence such as physical assault–punching (hitting with a fist), spanking, kicking, whipping, beating with an object, choking, smothering, burning intentionally, using or threatening to use a gun, knife or other weapons, regardless of whether or not it resulted in obvious physical or mental injury.

    Sexual violence describes all forms of sexual abuse and exploitation. This encompasses rape, attempted non-consensual sex acts, abusive sexual contact (i.e. unwanted touching) and pressured sex (such as through threats or tricks) regardless of the setting and perpetrators’ relationship to the child/victim. It was also established that victims experience these forms of violence on multiple occasions and they often experience more than one type (either at same time or at different points).

    Witnessing violence was said to have effects on children’s behavioural and social development as adults are significantly more likely to perpetrate physical violence against their intimate partner if they witnessed it in childhood.

    The representative of UN Women in Nigeria and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Dr. Grace Ongile said the choice of community and religious leaders was based on their roles as value bearers, spiritual mentors and critical stakeholders in the quest for sustainable peace.

    Ongile, who was represented by the Deputy Programme Manager, UN Women, Peter Mancha, said violence against women slows down poverty eradication, just as it is a consequence of discrimination against women. She added that prevention is possible.

    She said GBV/VAC prevention strategy needed to be backed by political will and holistic participation by all sectors of the community so that it could have a long-lasting and permanent impact.

    “Evidence has shown that community mobilisation to change social norms and educational programmes, including gender equality training for both women and men are some of the interventions that have helped.

    “It is, however, important to note that any prevention strategy that is not backed by political will and holistic participation from all sectors of the community will not have a long-lasting and permanent impact.

    “You and I can work together. Governments, civil society organisations, businesses, schools could help to achieve a more equal world where women/girls and children will be free from violence. A little touch goes a long way,” she said.

    Ongile said: “Religious and community leaders could bring the desired change when they continue to emphasise values and cultural practices that support equality and respect for women, girls and children in their teachings; support local programmes that provide services to victims and survivors; speak out about sexual assault and domestic violence as well as encourage and support training to increase the awareness about sexual assault and domestic violence.”

    Contributing, the Permanent Secretary, Gombe State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, Muhammadu Adamu Bappah said a draft copy of the domesticated Child Rights Law was already before the Ministry of Justice for consideration and onward presentation as bill to the State Assembly. He said it was against this background that the state government praised the stakeholders’ discussion on how best to handle and manage GBV/VAC in the state.

    He recalled that a 2014 National Survey Report indicates that “approximately six out of every 10 children experience some form of violence. Half of all children experience physical violence. One out of every four girls and one out of every 10 boys experience sexual violence while one out of six girls and one out of five boys experience emotional violence.”

    He said: “Thinking that violence against children is not a problem and that ‘it is their fault’ by perpetrators” were barriers to children seeking help against violence. The fear of getting into trouble and children’s inability to afford or get the services they need, fear of stigmatisation and lack of sufficient response to enable service providers analyse the reasons also build-up VAC.

    “These are traits that shape our perception, thinking and behaviours on GBC/VAC. We are aligned to our thinking in this modern age and present realities. GBC/VAC is moral imperatives. “I wish to call on us all to reconsider our belief systems, norms, values and practices which provide acceptable ways,” said the Permanent Secretary as he called on participants to step down the benefits of the forum in their respective areas.

    Quoting Marie Fortunes in his paper on “Christian Perspective on Violence against Women and Children in Nigeria,” Pastor Musa David described sexual assault as bodily sin that violates bodily boundaries and distorts one’s sense of body image. It is also a sin against relationship because it violates the command to love one’s neighbour as oneself.

    He further said it betrays trust and destroys relationships.

    and those who should have cared for them, the consequence of which could lead to distrust in victims in their future relationships. He said it is also a sin against the community surrounding the victim.

    He said referred to sexual assault as not only emotional trauma, but also a humiliating and debilitating loss of sense of self and something that “is deeply traumatising and resulting in devastating emotional and psychological consequences for the victim.”

    Pastor David emphasised the need for publicity on the issue through church magazines, postal/fliers with various pungent inscriptions; organising seminars/public lectures and rallies on war against GBV/VAC; enforcing church discipline without discrimination; launching a social media campaign and embarking on intercessory prayers, among others.

  • EU,UNICEF battle open defecation in Bayelsa

    EU,UNICEF battle open defecation in Bayelsa

    The European Union (EU)  and the United Nations  Education Funds (UNICEF) are worried about entrenched habit of openly depositing faeces in water bodies and general environment by residents of Bayelsa State especially persons living in the rural and coastal areas.

    The international agencies in collaboration with the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agencies (RUWASSA) observed with dismay that unhygienic lifestyles associated with poor management of faeces account for constant outbreaks of water borne diseases like cholera in some parts of the state.

    In fact,  the rural communities in the riverine Ijaw communities are polluted.  They lack access to clean drinking water.  They only rely on water from the rivers around them,  which are mostly contaminated, for drinking and other domestic purposes.

    According to research,people from rural area in Bayelsa state  greatly practice open defeacation  in their rivers, bush, and water banks. This is the same river they  swim in,fetch water for drinking,  and do other household activities. Most of them engage in the practice for misguided reasons.

    One of the villagers from Kaiama in  Kolokuma/Opokuma Local Government Area of the  state, said he  he enjoys his open defecation system because according to him, the fish in the river feeds and grows large from his faces.

    He said:  ”I defaecate in this river. I drink from this river. My fish feeds largely on my faeces, and I kill my fish  and then eat the end product of my feaces”.

    In fact,  there is a great need to improve on the people’s hygienic behavior by providing them with a good sanitation.

    UNICEF defined sanitation as the provision of facilities and services for the safe disposal of feaces and human urine adding that inadequate sanitation is known to be a major cause of water- borne diseases  such as cholera, typhoid, diarrhea and ringworm.

    Following their discovery,  UNICEF in partnership with EU and RUWASSA  floated a programme in Bayelsa to discourage unhygienic behaviour and encourage adoption of  Ecological Sanitation (ECOSAN) known as an improved approach in sanitation in Nigeria.

    Ecological Sanitation (ECOSAN) is seen as any sanitation systems whose ultimate objective is to achieve practical sustainability and still maintain human dignity. So, the sponsors assembled artisans, wash committees and other stakeholders from different communities in the state in Kaiama to learn about ECOSAN and take their lessons to their various settlements.

    The trainees comprising officials of RUWASSA,  local government area wash units, community artisans, state local government area wash consultants and  sanitation officers were  empowered with knowledge and practice of ECOSAN.  It was a one week event.

    They were not only taught the theories of ECOSAN, they also helped the sponsors in constructing a durable ECOSAN pit latrines one each in Kalama, Ekwuari,  and Brass.  They learnt the skills of building environmentally friendly latrines.

    Speaking at the event, a UNICEF consultant, Mr. Patrick Ikor, said that ecological sanitation stores feaces and enriches the soil for farming.

    “Ecological Sanitation does not pollute rather it encourages  storage and usage of urine and feces materials  that can further be poured into agricultural development. The  Ecosan system involves buidling a water tight vault for storage of faeces  and building water tight chambers for urine storage.

    “This urine when it is filled up,  the jerry cans introduced to the chambers are removed  and kept for over one month  for most of the disease causing organisms to die off  and it is then safe for use  in our agricultural products.

    He advised the communities to forego their open defecation and embrace Ecosan latrines which he described as modern and hygienic.

    Explaining how the Ecosan latrines should be used,  he said: “The ecosan toilet should be used In such a way that the urine does not  get  mixed with the feaces,    I will advise that whenever they are using the vaults, they  should make sure to use toilet paper so that they  would avoid water going into the feaces chamber.

    “They should follow the guidelines of the  trainers on how to use those latrines because if  water and urine are being mixed together the results or the expected desired results will not be achieved. And at the moment when feaces are separated from urine, it dehydrates.   “Anal cleansing method should be tissue paper and not water because there are some people that use water. But in this approach we are asking the community users to learn how to use tissue paper even though they might have been using water for their anal cleansing”.

    He said the evacuation of the compost should be done after one year just as he advised users of the facility to ensure that the surrounding of the toilets are kept clean.

    In fact,  the construction of the modern latrines brought joy to the benefitting communities. The Amanonowei of the Ekwuari community His Highness, Bernard Izimbadi, thanked  EU and UNICEF for bringing such facility to their community.

    ”We did not have public toilet and we were so worried about it. We normally go to defecate inside river, and other places like inside bush and on our surrounding but now that the toilet has come through the help of EU/UNICEF,  we are happy.

    He went further to state that  the use of the toilets would bring some behavioural change like the  use of tissue papers. He advised the residents to adopt the new latrine.

    Another Resident said:  ”The toilet is very important to our community, and we need it especially now. Many of us we use to go to the waterside to defecate but since they  have come to do this thing for us we appreciate it”.

    One of the participants, Mr..Ezekiel Okobo,  who hails from  Brass commended the  EU and UNICEF coming to their rescue by erecting a toilet facility for them. The facility according to him will go a long way in making life easier for the community.

    “This  is a new concept but what we intended doing is to call the wash committees, the chiefs, the community leaders and then arrange a town hall meeting where we will  educate them and tell them what  this new approach is all about  so that they can easily adopt the concept for their community”, he said.

     

     

  • EU intensifies push for endorsement

    EU intensifies push for endorsement

    The last couple of months have been particularly busy for the EU. Following the barrage of opposition against the endorsement of the EPA deal, members of the economic bloc have stepped up their shuttle economic diplomacy in Nigeria with a view to addressing some of the issues and concerns raised by manufacturers over the agreement. For instance, in one of the numerous fora organised by the EU in Lagos, its Ambassador/Head of Delegation to Nigeria & ECOWAS, Ambassador Michel Arrion, maintained that the EU has no offensive economic agenda against Nigeria regarding the implementation of the EPA.

    Rather, the EU’s mission in Nigeria and West Africa, he said, was to ensure the advancement of the competitiveness of the sub-region’s economic segments. The envoy expressed regrets that most of the arguments against the EPA were wrong, and are based on emotions rather than facts.

    He explained that in pushing for EPA, investors from EU countries see Nigeria as investors’ haven and so have no hidden agenda whatsoever.

    “We have no offensive agenda in Nigeria because we believe that Nigeria and ECOWAS are very important places where European or other non-European businesses could invest because there is enough room for investment,” he said.

    Arrion, however, assured that by investing in Nigeria and other ECOWAS member states, the EU would not invade the West African market with products that could compete with local products in the region, pointing out that the EU has removed all its export subsidies to the West African market.

    At the fourth EU-Nigeria Business Forum (EUNBF) with “Unlocking opportunities for diversification” as its theme in Lagos, Mr. Arrion also said the EU was hoping to explore opportunities available in Nigeria to diversify exports, increase foreign exchange, and attract more FDIs.

    “The most obvious comparative advantage Nigeria has is agriculture. But this must evolve from exports of primary products to  add value,” he said, adding that the overall objective of the forum’s 2015 edition was to deepen understanding of the EPA can play in supporting the diversification of Nigeria’s economy.

    Also, the EPA, the envoy stated, will strengthen EU-Nigeria business relations through identification of opportunities of partnership and hopefully, address the bottlenecks related to the effective development of agric-business in Nigeria.

    The European Commissioner for Trade, Ms Cecelia Malmstrom, also said the EPA remains the pathway to diversification.

    “For an economy that’s trying to diversify, access to export markets means new companies in new sectors can think big right from the start,” she said, citing examples of diversification and development in Asian countries, which grew over the last decades by opening up to imports-not overnight, but gradually.

    Her words: “Today it’s almost impossible to make a product or deliver a service without some kind of international input. In Asia, the model often involved importing high-tech components in order to assembly them into finished products before re-exporting.”

    According to her, “imports help keep costs down,” adding that “besides, imports, like foreign investment, transmit ideas and innovation, which are essential for an economy that wants to break newground. The EPA that we have negotiated between the countries of West Africa and the EU is about bringing all of these benefits to Nigeria. Signing and implementing it is a clear win for companies, workers, consumers and government.”

    Ms. Malmstrom added that the EPA will provide duty-free and quota-free access to a market for Nigeria’s exports; not just any market, but EU’s single market of 500 million people, which is the world’s highest. She said the icing on the cake of the EPA was a €6.5 billion, about N1.4 trillion development funds for Nigeria and other West African countries to support infrastructure projects as well as capacity building in the private sector and civil society.

    She explained: “The fund will help companies here in Nigeria to meet international health, safety and environmental standards that are vital for access to world market. It will support the efforts of Customs authorities to streamline their procedures so that border crossings don’t hold back growth.”

    Despite dangling the proverbial carrot in the form of infrastructure projects support fund, it is doubtful if manufacturers are swayed.

    But, the critical question raised by Prof. Oyejide is: “If we say no to EPA, what are we going to do with ECOWAS CET? That is the dilemma, as the implementation of EPA and ECOWAS CET are supposed to go hand in hand and will mutually reinforce each other.

  • EU, Colombia lifts short-stay visa requirements

    European Union (EU) and Colombia authorities on Wednesday in Brussels lifted short-stay visa requirements, allowing free movements on visiting one another’s territories.

    The visa waiver agreement was signed on behalf of Colombia by Foreign Minister, Maria-Angela Holguin, Jean Asselborn, Luxembourg Foreign Minister along with European Migration Commissioner, Dimitris Avramopoulos, in the presence of Colombian President Juan Santos.

    Asselborn said this was contained under an agreement signed by both, that citizens no longer required visas.

    He said the visa waiver would provisionally come into force on Thursday.

    “Granting visa-free travel for EU citizens to Colombia and for Colombians visiting the bloc for stays of up to 90 days within a 180-day period.

    “This agreement will bring the people of Colombia and the EU closer together,” he said.

    Asselborn said the deal was expected to boost tourism and business ties between the EU and Colombia.

    He noted that ties between both countries had been wracked by decades of conflict between government forces and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia guerilla group.

    “The two sides are working on a peace accord.

    Santos said the agreement had opened the doors to all Colombians who want to come to Europe legally.

    “They will finally be able to visit relatives living in the EU.

    “For now there is no discussion about Colombians illegally living in the bloc, this is “not an easy issue,’’ he said.

    The president said the decision would be vetted by the European Parliament, a step he described to be a formality.

    Santos said Britain and Ireland are excluded from the deal, meaning that those countries can still set their own visa rules for Colombian citizens, and vice versa.

     

  • ‘Nigeria’s problem with ECOWAS, EU deal self-inflicted’

    The furore over perceived negative effects of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the European Union (EU) and Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS ) on the Nigerian manufacturing sector, according to a University don, is self-inflicted.

    To T. Ademola Oyejide, Emeritus Professor of Economics, University of Ibadan, it was so because Nigeria failed to do what it ought to do during the negotiations.

    The EPA is an EU-sponsored Free Trade Agreement (FTA) designed to create free trade area between the EU and Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries, in which duties on goods imported and exported between the parties are reduced and eventually removed.

    The goals of EPA are to promote economic growth and development, reduce poverty in the partnering countries, expand and diversify trade and increase domestic and foreign investment. However, manufacturers have been literarily up in arms, insisting that the EPA would hurt the economy and the manufacturing sector in particular.

    Citing Nigeria’s weak manufacturing base caused by lack of supportive infrastructure and hash operating environment, manufacturers consistently opposed the endorsement of the deal. Their argument is that if Nigeria signs the agreement most industries will close down, as local manufacturers cannot compete favourably with goods from Europe and other developed economies.

     

    But Prof Oyejide said Nigeria did not do what it ought to do as far as EPA negotiations are concerned. “The negative impacts were known prior to negotiations, but there were gaps in Nigeria’s preparations for and actual negotiation of the EPA,” Oyejide, who is also Chairman, Center for Trade and Development Initiative (CTDi), Ibadan, said.

    Prof. Oyejide who spoke on the sideline of the 44th Annual General Meeting (AGM) of Apapa Branch, Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), said the negative effects of the EPA that Nigeria is talking about now were well known prior to the negotiations in 2004.

    According to him, several studies commissioned by the EU showed the negative effects of the partnership agreement, and Nigeria never raised any issues regarding them until Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire ratified the deal.

    The EPA negotiations between EU and ECOWAS took off in August 2004, but the most important milestone was the adoption by ECOWAS of a Common External Tariff (CET) on October 25. After one round only of post-CET discussions, negotiations were concluded in February 2014 in Ghana.

    All 28 EU member states and 13 of the 16 ECOWAS member states signed the EPA in December 2014. The Gambia, Mauritania and Nigeria have not yet signed. All countries must sign before ratification can begin, and only with ratification (not signature) will the EPA enter into force.

  • SON, EU to end rejection of export products

    SON, EU to end rejection of export products

    The Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) has partnered the European Union (EU) to build capacities and competences required to stop rejection of exports from Nigeria at the global market.

    It said to meet up with the diversification agenda of the Presidency, which would be pursued with the support of 2016 budget, Nigerian products must gain acceptance at the international market.

    Its Director-General, Dr. Joseph Odumodu, said to prevent the nation from suffering   disadvantages due to non-acceptability of its exports, 70 workers of SON, who will retrain others across the value chain, will be trained by the team of experts from EU for eight months.

    He spoke at the inaugural meeting of SON with the experts for the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP)-EU-Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) programme on capacity building and training on standardisation.

    The theme of the forum was: “Fostering Standardisation Values and Capacity Growth for Made-in-Nigeria Products”.

    He said Nigeria, buying 80 per cent of what it consumes and selling less than 20 per cent of what it has capacity to produce, is a net buyer at the international community.

    He said:  “The partnership with EU to build capacities for Made-in-Nigeria goods is a micro quality intervention programme focused on specific areas such as agricultural produce, chemical testing, electronics and electrical, as well as identifying gaps in the processes of accreditation of laboratories.”