Tag: facing

  • Facing political reality

    SIR: The future of Nigeria as a single sovereign state has been a subject of debate in our recent national discourse. The debate has become so interesting with the use semantics that have dominated the political literature.

    The latest of such was the postulate of Chief Bisi Akande that the APC as a political party never promised restructuring but power devolution from the centre to states. In a similar vein, the Alaafin of Oyo, Oba Lamidi Olayiwola Adeyemi III in his characteristic unrepentance for true federalism in a recent interview said that whether you call it restructuring, power devolution or whatever, it is still two sides of the same coin.

    The ambivalence of President Buhari and his political foot soldiers in the Arewa Consultative Forum ACF is quite understandable. To them, restructuring is another word for the country’s breakup through whatever form including referendum if it is possible.

    This is more so when the cry of marginalization and infrastructural neglect in both the South-east and South-south is more than a wolf cry. To them, it is real. What cannot be denied is that the Yoruba have always been the moderating or balancing factor in Nigeria’s politics especially when it comes to crisis of confidence and ethnic suspicion. The Yoruba or the South-west have always played the Big Daddy role. That has been the case since the days of Obafemi Awolowo in his popular advocacy for true federalism.

    If there is anything to allay fears that Yoruba advocacy in recent time does not have any secession undertone, it is the support of the Alaafin, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi. This is because even at the most critical and vulnerable time of the country’s survival as one indivisible country, he stood by One Nigeria through true federalism.

    Particular reference should be made of the Second Republic when most Yoruba people felt robbed of Awolowo Presidency at that time by powers that be. To Alaafin at that time, whatever the political injury inflicted by that election could still be healed within the context of One Nigeria. Because of that, the Alaafin remained a suspect in any Yoruba political polemics for a long time.

    The interest of the Alaafin in an indivisible Nigeria is quite understood. To him and especially between the Yoruba and the Hausa, their relationship transcends politics. It has to be seen through commerce when the Alaafin spearheaded the opening of the Kolanut Market to the Hausa long before the amalgamation. That inter-trade relationship has led to the opening of Sabo quarters in both Yoruba in the West and the Hausa in the North. That architectural arrangement has lasted for about a century before amalgamation.

    At the same time, that cultural arrangement between the two communities has led to intermarriages and all sorts. That both the Yoruba and the Hausa communities have benefitted from that age-long relationship needs not be overemphasized. Apart from the Alaafin too, the core Yoruba political class has always believed in a united Nigeria. When I say the core Yoruba political class, I refer to the Afenifere Group most of whose members have rendered selfless service to the country since the Awolowo days.

    Like their political mentor and role model, Chief Awolowo, they believe in justice and equity where none of the federating units will play second fiddle to another. There is no better way to ensure that than a return to true federalism.

    However, the truth must be said that the cry of marginalization across board has never been so vociferous as under President Buhari. It has reached such a situation that the World Bank had to be specifically directed to look towards the old Northern Region for its development projects. That coming from no other person than the President himself is unfortunate.

    Similarly, all key appointments into the federal service and its agencies are in favour of a section of the North. That does not exclude the NNPC whose product – oil is in the Niger Delta and where the indigenes are being discriminated against in executive appointments.

    The onus is therefore on President Buhari to look inwards and tackle the issue of restructuring or power devolution with the maximum urgency it deserves.

     

    • Dr Michael Adebiyi,

     Ikeja, Lagos.

  • Putin is facing his moment of truth

    Putin is facing his moment of truth

     – Tragedy of MH17 shows he is losing control in Ukraine

    An recent years Vladimir Putin, Russia’s president, has been an unconstructive actor on the world stage, notorious for his protection of the murderous Assad regime in Syria and for the annexation of Crimea. But how he acts following the shooting down of a Malaysian airliner over Ukraine will probably do more than anything else to seal his international reputation.

    It may be that this terrible tragedy, in which 298 innocent people died, will convince the Kremlin leader to shut down the bloody insurgency in eastern Ukraine that he has fuelled by covertly supplying arms to the pro-Russian rebels fighting the Kiev government. Alternatively, he may try to prevent the truth over Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 emerging and stick to his policy of dismembering Ukraine to stop it shifting to the west. If he chooses the latter course, Russia will become an international pariah and a dark new era in east-west relations will begin.

    Following the destruction of MH17, there has been much dispute as to who was responsible. The circumstantial evidence indicates that the aircraft was shot down by pro-Russian separatists. There is a question mark over how the rebels came to be in possession of such a potent surface-to-air missile system. They may have stolen it from the Ukrainian military or – far more gravely – obtained it directly from Russia. But it seems inconceivable that the Boeing 777 was fired on by Ukraine’s armed forces, given the absence of any military aircraft on the rebel side.

    A full and independent investigation into the aircraft’s destruction is needed. The separatists, who control the territory where the aircraft crashed, must give investigators unrestricted access to the site and to the black box recorders. This may require Mr Putin to put unequivocal public pressure on the pro-Russian militants to comply. Should he fail, the Kremlin leader risks losing what remains of his international credibility.

    Mr Putin’s responsibilities go far beyond this. Although the Kremlin has accepted the emergence of Petro Poroshenko as Ukraine’s elected president, it has continued to feed the conflict by supplying the rebels with ever more tanks and heavy weaponry. Moscow must end this flow of materiel, force the separatists to stop fighting and dissolve the Donetsk People’s Republic.

    If Mr Putin does not rise to the challenge, the west needs to be firm in its response. Before the MH17 disaster the US was correct to impose fresh sanctions. Should there be no change in Kremlin behaviour, President Barack Obama would be justified in pressing for tougher economic penalties, the only way to concentrate the Kremlin’s mind.

    European leaders should also rethink their collective stance. The bloc has been disappointingly divided between those, like the central Europeans, who take a tough approach to Russia and those, like Italy and parts of the German government, that are reluctant because of the threat to economic ties. As a result the EU has passed far less stringent sanctions than the US. If the death of 298 people – among them at least 198 Europeans – on a flight out of Amsterdam does not make EU leaders think again, nothing will.

    However, it is Mr Putin who ultimately holds the key to resolving this crisis. He needs to act while he still has the power to dictate events. At home, the Russian president has encouraged a pro-separatist frenzy across state media that risks becoming unstoppable. In eastern Ukraine he has unleashed heavily armed forces whose indiscriminate conduct he is now struggling to contain.

    The tragedy of MH17 is a terrible sign of how the conflict in Ukraine is slipping catastrophically out of control. Mr Putin has precious little time to change course.

    – Financial Times

     

  • Negredo, Garcia facing City axe

    Alvaro Negredo and Javi Garcia may be sold by Manchester City in order to make way for the imminent £32 million arrival of Eliaquim Mangala from Porto.

    City are hopeful of landing the centre-back and Mangala was pictured at Manchester airport having reportedly undergone a medical.

    But with City being limited next season to 17 non-homegrown players in the Premier League and 16 in the Champions League after breaching Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules, the signing of Mangala would push them over the limits and they may be forced to offload Negredo and Garcia.

    Negredo has reportedly told City that he wants to move back to Spain having joined from Sevilla last summer for around £16m – scoring 23 goals in his debut season in the Premier League.

    Garcia, who arrived from Benfica for £15.8m, is also in danger of being sold with Napoli reportedly monitoring the defensive midfielder.

  • Jadeja facing misconduct charge

    Jadeja facing misconduct charge

    England team manager Phil Neale has charged India’s Ravindra Jadeja under Level 2 of the International Cricket Council’s code of conduct.

    The allegation relates to the altercation between Jadeja and England bowler James Anderson as they made their way off for lunch on day two of the first Investec Test at Trent Bridge.

    India decided on Tuesday to charge Anderson at Level 3 – under which guilt is punishable by up to a four-Test ban – and the England and Wales Cricket Board immediately made clear its intention to send a counter-allegation against Jadeja to Dubai.

    On Wednesday afternoon, the eve of the second Test at Lord’s, the ICC acknowledged receipt.

    A press release read: “The ICC today confirmed that England team manager Phil Neale has charged India’s Ravindra Jadeja under Level 2 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel for an alleged incident that took place on the second day of the first cricket Test at Trent Bridge.

    “The alleged offence has been reported under Article 2.2.11 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which states: “Where the facts of the alleged incident are not adequately or clearly covered by any of the above offences, conduct that either: (a) is contrary to the spirit of the game; or (b) brings the game into disrepute.”

    All Level 2 breaches carry a fine of between 50-100 per cent of a match fee or a possible one-Test ban.

     

  • Islam facing great challenge, says Tambuwal

    House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Waziri Tambuwal has attributed the enormous challenges facing Islam to the lack of proper understanding of its tenets by a few vocal people within its fold.

    Tambuwal stressed the need for religious leaders and traditional rulers to redouble their efforts to inculcate the basics of Islam in the consciousness of the Muslim faithful, to correct the misgivings of the activities of some of the youth.

    Speaking during the national prayer session organised by the Tijjaniyya Brotherhood at the Emir’s Palace in Kano yesterday, Tambuwal said despite insecurity and other negative challenges confronting the nation, the hope of a brighter future is not lost.

    He said various problems are confronting Muslim youths, but he urged them not to deviate from the teachings of their religion.

    The Speaker said Islam, like other religions, encourages peaceful co-existence among people, stressing that any effort to undermine the peaceful atmosphere should be resisted by all and sundry.

    While hailing the Emir of Kano, Alhaji Ado Bayero, for organising the annual national prayer session, Tambuwal urged religious leaders to intensify prayers for the nation and its leaders.

    Tambuwal said lawmakers, especially those in the lower chamber of the National Assembly, would protect the interest of the people.