Tag: Falana

  • Afe Babalola, Falana for UI’s forum

    Afe Babalola, Falana for UI’s forum

    Legal luminary Aare Afe Babalola (SAN) will today chair an interactive session, where 13 vice chancellorship aspirants will speak with the University of Ibadan’s (UI) community.

    The programme is being organised by the staff unions on the campus – Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Non-Academic Staff Union (NASU), Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU) and National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT) – under the chairmanship of Prof. Nelson Fashina.

    Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) will moderate at the interactive forum.

    As at the close of nominations, 13 professors have indicated interest in the position as the incumbent Prof. Isaac Adewole ends his tenure this year.

    The forum, which is scheduled for Trenchard Hall of the premier university at 10am, will be attended by former vice chancellors of the university.

  • Falana threatens legal action over Sexual Offences Bill

    Falana threatens legal action over Sexual Offences Bill

    Lagos lawyer, Femi Falana(SAN) has said that one of the 46 bills hurriedly passed into law by the last Senate cannot stand the test of time as it contained obnoxious provisions and discriminates against victims.

    While the new bill criminalised the defilement of children under 11 years, Falana noted that the minimum age of 18 years in the original Bill was in line with the provisions of the Child’s Rights Act, 2003 and  the Child’s Rights Convention of the United Nations which has been ratified by Nigeria.

    In a letter to nobel  laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka dated June 14, 2015, Falana and wife,Funmi accused the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Legal Matters for illegally removing the age of 18 years and replacing it with 11 years in the new bill.

    The erudite lawyer and his wife Funmi, who is the founder of Women Empowerment and Legal Aid (WELA) claimed to have confirmed  that the bill has not been forwarded to President Mohammadu Buhari for his assent as it has not been passed by  the House of Representatives.

    They  have however threatened legal action  if the bill is eventually passed into law with its obnoxious provisions.

    “We shall not hesitate to pray the Federal High Court to strike it down in view of Article 18(3) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights  (Ratification and Enforcement) Act (Cap A9) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 which has imposed a duty on the Government of Nigeria to “ensure the elimination of every discrimination against women and ensure the  protection of the rights of the woman and the child, as stipulated in international declarations and conventions”, as declared in the letter written to Prof. Wole Soyinka.

    The Falanas thanked Prof. Soyinka for drawing the nation’s attention to the odious provision of the Sexual Offences Bill in their letter.

    They stated in their letter to the nobel  laureate the defunct the Senate of the 7th National Assembly, during its valedictory session, did not pay any attention to then  provisions of the bill which was among the 46 bills hurriedly passed before their exit.

    They recalled that Senator Chris Anyanwu who sponsored the Sexual Offences Bill had  justified the urgent need to pass it to save our girls and women from sexual exploitation and molestation.

    “When the Bill was unanimously passed for a second reading by the Senate on November 21, 2013,  it sought to  prescribe a penalty of life imprisonment for the offence of defilement of children less than 18 years of age.

    “It also provided for compulsory documentation, supervision of sexual offenders and medical treatment for rape victims while it strengthened the weak protection offered victims and witnesses in trials for sexual offences.

    “The minimum age of 18 years in the original Bill was in line with the provisions of the Child’s Rights Act, 2003 and  the Child’s Rights Convention of the United Nations which has been ratified by Nigeria.

    “The Bill  was referred to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Legal Matters for further legislative work. It was that Committee that illegally removed the age of 18 years and replaced it with 11 years. The inserted clause is inconsistent with section 29(4)(a) of the Nigerian Constitution which provides that  “full age” means the age of 18 years and above.

  • Don’t depend on IMF, World Bank, Falana tells Buhari

    Don’t depend on IMF, World Bank, Falana tells Buhari

    •’CBN now Bureau de Change’

    Activist-lawyer Mr Femi Falana (SAN) has implored President Muhammadu  Buhari not to depend on the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank for the nation’s economic revival.

    Falana also enjoined the President not to romance with the local captains of industry if he truly wants to grow the economy.

    He chided the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for its failure to monitor the nation’s economic policy.

    The lawyer spoke yesterday in Lagos at the National Discourse organised by The Companion, a group of Muslim men in business and professions, at the main auditorium of the University of Lagos, Akoka.

    Falana urged the President to form a link with the Nigerian people, saying the people should be identified through organisations, farmers, workers and the rest, and settle down to run the country on that basis.

    “If you are going to depend on IMF and World Bank and these funny characters called captains of industry, we are not going to make any progress,” he warned.

    “I want the president to form an organic link with the Nigerian people, not with Tony Blairs of this world, not with profiteers and rent collectors who you guys in the media regard as captains of industry; which industry? … that have collapsed? All these guys depend on duty waivers of trillions of naira. If you give me N500 billion worth of duty waivers, why will I not be the richest man in Africa?” he wondered.

    Falana decried the CBN’s deviation from its primary roles as the chief regulatory of body of the nation’s economy.

    “Our Central Bank,” he said, “has become a centre for Bureau de Change; it only talks of manipulating dollars. That is what Central Bank does now. It has nothing to do with acting as regulator of the monetary policy of our country. Once you have that kind of situation, you cannot put blame on corruption; corruption itself is manifestation of economic mismanagement. You can’t secure the lives of our people under this arrangement; you cannot create employment under this arrangement; you can’t generate electricity under this arrangement; we have spent $25 billion in the last 16 years to generate darkness; it is a shame that we now have power generation less than 2000 megawatts.

    Speaking on the theme Setting Agenda for the new government, Falana said that for the president to successfully fight corruption, some blockages had to be made, without which it would be an effort in futility.

    He urged Muslims in government to follow the teachings of the Holy Qu’ran because “the situation we find ourselves would have been solved long time ago, but due to greediness and having no regards for our creator.

    “The level of corruption in the country should be put on the Christian and Muslim leaders who have no regards for what they are taught in the two holy books.”

    Falana added that, corruption breeds unemployment and insecurity in the country, adding that President Buhari should remember what he said about the scourge during his electioneering campaign that if corruption is not killed, it would kill Nigeria.

    The Guest Speaker, Prof Abubakar Momoh enjoined President Buhari to take a cue from the Republic of China’s economic policy devoid of IMF and World Bank input.

    He urged the president to toe the line of China on how they grow their economy from zero level to what it is today.

    Momoh said: “President Buhari should emulate China which adopted the policy of economic sovereignty, rather than accepting what the International Monetary Fund told him to do.

    “Without economic sovereignty, the president cannot guarantee regular power supply, employment, good road network and infrastructural development for the citizenry.”

    The Companion Amir (President), Alhaji Musibau Oyefeso urged the president to always send the right signals that he do not condone corruption either in the open or in secret

    The government, Oyefeso said, should also have the courage and the political will to punish crime irrespective of the status of whoever is involved.

    “The rule of law must be uniformly applied to all citizens and institutions. Our criminal laws must also be reformed constantly in line with modern-day realities in order to block loopholes in the existing laws,” he said.

     

  • Planned extradition of senator-elect lawful, says Falana

    Planned extradition of senator-elect lawful, says Falana

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) has explained that the planned extradition of senator-elect of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Chief Buruji Kashamu to the United States (U.S.) is in accordant with the rule of law and in line with the provisions of the Extradition Act.

    In a statement in Lagos yesterday, titled: “Legal Implications of Kashamu’s extradition”, Falana advised the senator-elect to surrender himself for trial in the U.S. instead of embarking on a prolonged legal battle in Nigeria.

    The learned silk, who contended that the fundamental right of Kashamu to personal liberty has not been violated in any way so far, added: “But if he insists on his innocence, let the law take its course through the extradition proceedings”.

    The statement reads in part: “The Extradition Treaty between Nigeria and the U.S. was signed on June 24, 1935 while it entered into force on June 24, 1935. The treaty was signed with the U.S. by the British colonial regime, which then exercised dominion over the territory of Nigeria.

    “When Nigeria obtained political independence from the Britannic Majesty in 1960, the treaty was, like several others, adopted by the Federal Government. By virtue of Article 3 of the treaty, extradition shall be reciprocally granted for crimes or offences such as  murder, manslaughter, administering drugs or using instruments with intent to procure the miscarriage of women, rape, threats, by letter or otherwise, with intent to extort money or other things of value, larceny or embezzlement,  fraud or  fraudulent conversion, obtaining money, valuable security, or goods, by false pretences, crimes or offences or attempted crimes or offences in connection with the traffic in dangerous drugs.

    “Under the treaty, extradition shall not take place if the person claimed he has already been tried and discharged or punished, or is still under trial in the territories of the High Contracting Party applied to, for the crime or offence for which his extradition is demanded.

    “If the person claimed should be under examination or under punishment in the territories of the High Contracting Party applied to for any other crime or offence, his extradition shall be deferred until the conclusion of the trial and the full execution of any punishment awarded to him. Even though the treaty is silent on civil proceedings challenging the legal validity of the extradition of any person the exercise may be stayed or suspended if there is a court order to that effect.

    “By virtue of  the Extradition Act Cap E25, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, the Attorney-General or a court shall not surrender a  fugitive criminal, if satisfied that the offence in respect of which his surrender is sought is an offence of a political character or that the request for  surrender, although purporting to be made in respect of an extradition crime, was in fact made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing him on account of his race, religion, nationality or political opinions or was otherwise not made in good faith or in the interests of justice; or that, if surrendered, he is likely to be prejudiced at his trial, or to be punished, detained or restricted in his personal liberty, by reason of his race, religion, nationality or political opinions,” he noted.

    Falana explained that in the case of Kashamu, the order of the Federal High Court that he should not be extradited has been set aside by the Court of Appeal.

    “Although the appeal filed against the decision is pending at the Supreme Court, there is no order of execution or interlocutory injunction restraining the Federal Government from extraditing Chief Kashamu to the U.S. to stand trial for drug trafficking. Hence, the PDP chieftain and senator-elect has initiated a fresh suit at the Federal High Court to thwart any move to extradite him to the United States!

    “As the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Mohammed Adoke, SAN has not been legally prohibited on the matter he is reported to have concluded arrangements to commence extradition proceedings on the basis of a request made by the United States pursuant to the Extradition Treaty.”

    He noted that before Kashamu parted ways with President Olusegun Obasanjo in the PDP and before the appointment of Mrs. Roli George as the director-general of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, the senator-elect had been on the wanted list of the United States for drug related offences.

    “Therefore, the allegation that Chief Obasanjo and Chief Olabode George are behind the ongoing moves to extradite the senator-elect is illogical, spurious and diversionary,” the Lagos lawyer said.

    Falana advised that instead of politicising the planned extradition proceedings, Kashamu should be prepared for the legal battle ahead, adding: “He is lucky that he is detained in his own house. But for his status as a member of the ruling class, Chief Kashamu would have been bundled to the NDLEA detention facility in Lagos, where he would have been denied access to his phone.”

    He added that the decent treatment being accorded the PDP chieftain was part of the intangible dividends of democracy.

    Only the rich are detained in their homes as the concept of “house arrest” is unknown to our criminal justice system, Falana said.

    He noted that under the military rule, the embattled PDP leader would have been arrested, handcuffed and handed to American security officials.

    According to the rights activist, “He would have been further manacled and flown to the United States for trial. At the material time, extradition proceedings were not conducted in any court.”

  • Fayose to Falana: I never provide cover for criminals

    Fayose to Falana: I never provide cover for criminals

    Ekiti State Governor, Ayo Fayose, has denied the allegation from Lagos lawyer, Femi Falana that he is providing official cover for armed gangs to operate in the state.

    The governor, who described the allegation as “hypocritical, ridiculous and nonsensical,” said Falana’s statement was made out of malice to tarnish his image, urging Ekiti people and other Nigerians to ignore the rights activist.

    In a statement issued by his Chief Press Secretary, Idowu Adelusi, Fayose said Falana is yet to recover from the defeat he (Falana) suffered in the 2003 governorship election in which he contested on the platform of the National Conscience Party (NCP).

    He urged the rights activist to mind his business and stop being pretentious about some issues and acting as a defender in matter not involving his friends and paymasters.

    Fayose said: “Falana should be ignored because he is fond of beating about the bush and his utterances are always dictated by the percentage of ‎ stomach infrastructure from his paymasters.

    “I have never and will never provide official cover for armed gang‎s. It is only a governor or leader that is not popular or loved by his people that would adopt such unconventional means to rule,” he said.

    The governor said the love Ekiti people have for him was further demonstrated‎ in the last general election by the pattern the people voted for his party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

     

  • Why kidnappers are busy in Ekiti, by Falana

    Why kidnappers are busy in Ekiti, by Falana

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana has taken a swipe at the Ekiti State government, saying it is responsible for the spate of kidnappings in the state.

    In a statement yesterday, the fiery lawyer said: “Last week, Governor Ayo Fayose was reported to have sent a Save our Soul (SOS) to the Inspector-General of Police, Solomon Arase, over the spate of kidnapping in the state.

    “I ‘m compelled to point out that the government has itself to blame for deliberately providing official cover for armed gangs and other criminally minded individuals, who have taken over the monopoly of violence in Ekiti State.

    “For instance, the House of Assembly complex has been occupied by hoodlums since November with the connivance of the state government.

    “In this atmosphere of impunity, the well known armed thugs operating in Ekiti State have been granted immunity by the Federal Government.

    “Hence, police officers are under strict instructions not to arrest or prosecute them.

    “Recently, a commissioner of police, who was determined to rid the state of crimes, was queried and investigated by the Police Service Commission.

    “Even though he was not indicted, the commission ensured that he was posted out of the state.

    “Based on such official endorsement of criminality, kidnappers and other criminal elements have been having a field day in the state.

    “Indeed, the task of maintaining law and order in the state has been compounded by the six-month old industrial action of judicial workers.

    “Thus, in the last sixmonths, no suspect has been charged to court.

    “All criminal cases pending in the courts have been adjourned sine die. I have confirmed that the kidnappers, who made the state ungovernable from 2009-2010 and who were on trial before the Kogi State High Court, escaped from prison during a recent jail break.

    “Having not been declared wanted, the criminals are alleged to have resumed the nefarious business of kidnapping.

    “It is on record that Ekiti has consistently witnessed politically motivated killings since 2003.

    “To the credit of the police and the Department for State Service (DSS), all the suspected murderers and their sponsors were nabbed and charged to court at various times.

    “But apart from the killers of two students who were convicted in 2005, the suspected killers of Tunde Omojola, Ayo Daramola, Kehinde Fasubaa, a Foluso Ogundare and others are walking free in the society due to political pressure exerted on the security agencies.

    “Since the files of all the murder cases are in police custody, the IG ought to re-arrest and prosecute the suspects.

    “In addition, the IG should prevail on Governor Fayose to realise that as the chief security officer he has  enormous constitutional responsibility to maintain law and order.

    “As a matter of urgency, he should be made to distance himself from criminality and allow the police to disband and disarm the armed thugs, who have been linked with kidnapping.

    “Finally, the governor should emulate his colleagues who have succeeded in persuading judicial workers to call off their strike.

    “A state where judges are beaten up by thugs and courts are locked up indefinitely cannot genuinely guarantee law and order.”

  • Controversy on constitution’s alteration unnecessary, says Falana

    Controversy on constitution’s alteration unnecessary, says Falana

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana yesterday said that the controversy surrounding the amendment of the constitution was unnecessary.

    He noted that the National Assembly was misled into believing that it could move Section 18 of the Constitution to Chapter Four.

    But the move, he said, was “unnecessary.”

    According to him, Chapter Four of the Constitution cannot be amended without a resolution of four-fifth of the National Assembly members.

    Falana, who spoke on Sunrise Programme of Channels TV, explained that President Goodluck Jonathan was right, in some areas, on some of the issues he raised concerning the amendment of Sections 8, 9 and Chapter 4.

    He described the silence of the lawmakers on those sections as “disturbing”, adding that they should have joined issues with the President.

    Falana said: “I also felt that this whole controversy is totally unnecessary. Maturity should have prevailed. I thought the President should have drawn the attention of the leadership of the National Assembly to his observations and then this matter will be ironed out.

    “There is no doubt that some of the issues raised by the President are valid. And with profound respect, I think the National Assembly was misled in many areas.

    “For instance, Section 18 of the Constitution on free education for primary school pupils was taken to Chapter 4; totally unnecessary for two reasons: one, you cannot amend Chapter 4 without a resolution by four-fifth majority of the National Assembly members. Because Chapter Four is a fundamental right provision so that nobody tinker with it at anytime the way he or she likes. That is why the amendment procedure is very strict.

    “Why I am saying that it was totally unnecessary is that there are two laws – the Child Rights Act of 2003 and the UBE Act of 2004 that have made education compulsory and free from primary to junior secondary school for every Nigerian child. So, you don’t need to remove it from Chapter Two and take it to Chapter Four because we have left that stage.

    “If you look at the reasons proffered by the President, the National Assembly has failed to join issues with the President and I find that disturbing. You are being told you have amended Section 8, 9, and Chapter 4 that require four-fifth majority of your member, you are silent on that. You are being told that you should not have taken this question of state primary education to Chapter Four, you are not saying anything about that. You are granting immunity to yourselves.”

  • Falana petitions African Commisssion over unlawful arrest of Zambian activist

    Falana petitions African Commisssion over unlawful arrest of Zambian activist

    Following the arrest and prosecution of an anti-corruption activist, Mutembo Nchito, by the Zambian government, Activist lawyer  Femi Falana (SAN) has appealed to the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights to intervene in the  case.

    In an April 24 petition addressed to the Rapporteur on human rights defenders at the commission, Madamme Reine Alapini-Gansous, Falana urged the body to prevail on Zambian government to drop the charges against Nchito.

    Tagged: ‘’Request for urgent action in the case of unlawful arrest and continuing intimidation and harassment of a human rights defender and anti-corruption campaigner, Mutembo Nchito”, the petition prayed the commission to compel the government of Zambia to desist from harrassing the activist.

    Falana who also copied  Michel FORST,  Special Rapporteur on the situation of human right defenders, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations, alleged that the charges against Nchito were ‘politically motivated’.

    He  expressed  concern over the unlawful detention and continuous harrassment of  Nchito through politically motivated charges, fueled by  his anti-corruption and  human rights work as the country’s Director of Public Prosecution.

    “We, therefore, ask you to urgently assert your mandates to put pressure on the government of Zambia to immediately end all forms of intimidation and harassment of Mutembo Nchito and to drop all politically motivated charges against him. The Special Rapporteur should send a strong message to the government of Zambia that the campaign of unlawful arrest and detention, intimidation and harassment against anti-corruption campaigners is unacceptable, and will not be tolerated”, he stated.

    “As Director of Public Prosecutions, Mutembo Nchito has discharged his mandate with a reasonable measure of success. Since 2002, he has prosecuted many cases of high profile corruption that have seen him indict two former presidents, a chief of intelligence, a Zambia Army Commander, a Zambia Air Force commander and a commander of another defence force called Zambia National Service. He also prosecuted a former Minister of Finance and his permanent secretaries for corruption and abuse of office among many other high profile individuals. His excellent achievements as anti-corruption defenders with high conviction rates have expectedly earned him very powerful enemies within the political system’, Falana noted.

    He further stated that at the time of the death of Zambia’s fifth president, Michael Sata, in October 2014, Nchito was in the middle of prosecuting former president Mr Rupiah Banda for abuse of office by Banda’s personalising of the proceeds of a government contract which, in concert with his family he banked in Singapore.

    He recalled that the funds laundered through Mauritius was transferred to Japan for purchases that were then shipped to Zambia , pointing out that “this money came from the supply of 20,000 barrels of crude oil daily by the late Umar Yar’Adua government to the Zambian government, as supposed Nigeria’s contribution to Zambia’s development. This case has reached an advanced stage as he has closed the state’s case and it is now for the court to determine whether the president has a case to answer.

    “However, following the election of Mr Edgar Chagwa Lungu as president on January 20, 2015, former president Mr Rupiah Banda switched his support from his own party to Mr Edgar Chagwa Lungu’s ruling party, who publicly acknowledged financially benefiting from Mr Banda for his campaigns.

    “Before the Election, The Post, a leading Zambian newspaper published an article that claimed that the quid pro quo for Banda’s support for Lungu was that his cases in court would be stopped. Citing sources who were allegedly close to the discussions The Post disclosed that Banda and Lungu agreed that a way should be found to remove Mutembo Nchito from the office of Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to make their work easier. Once this scheme was publicly exposed it appeared that new approaches had to be found.

    “On Thursday, February 5, Mutembo Nchito’s elder brother Mr Nchima Nchito SC with whom he practised law before becoming DPP, was called by his former Law School class mate who also happened to be one of president Mr Edgar Chagwa Lungu’s campaign managers. His name is  Mr Kelvin Fube Bwalya. When Mutembo Nchito’s brother went for the meeting, Mr Bwalya informed him that he had a message for  Mutembo Nchito from the President. The message was to the effect that the President wanted Mutembo Nchito to resign or face an acrimonious removal process.  Mutembo Nchito’s brother wondered why the President was using a private individual to deal with the removal of the DPP. He wondered why the President could not call him. He was told that the President did not want to speak to him”.

    Falana  said Mutembo Nchito has continued to be harassed and intimidated by the new government in Zambia, adding on Monday, February 9, 2015, he received a tip-off from a journalist that he had received information that in order to facilitate the ending of cases involving former President Banda and investigations against members of his family he would be arrested to create a basis for his removal from office.                                                                                                                                                                                    He recalled that a very close associate of president, Edgar Chagwa Lungu, was used to lodge a criminal complaint against Mutembo Nchito and to obtain an arrest warrant on charges that have not been investigated by any competent authority.                                                                                                                                          He said Mutembo Nchito successfully obtained Leave to commence judicial review proceedings which was adjudged to operate as a stay of the warrant arrest from an inferior tribunal but this order was blatantly disregarded when he was bundled in vehicle and driven 50 kilometres outside Lusaka where he was thrown into a crowded cell like a common criminal.

    He believed Mutembo Nchito was supposedly suspended by president Edgar Chagwa Lungu who also gave an order for a tribunal to be constituted to investigate allegations him by a staunch supporter of the former president Rupiah Banda whom he is prosecuting for corruption. As things stand, Mutembo Nchito is facing a removal tribunal without ever having been asked to respond to the charges as a starting point. The  tribunal hurriedly set up to investigate the suspended DPP is constituted by three former chief justices.                                                                                                                                                         “It is pertinent to note that two of the tribunal members were forced to prematurely resign from office based on charges of corruption, bribery and abuse of office which were investigated by Mutembo Nchito. It can be concluded that a verdict of guilt is inevitable from such a fundamentally biased tribunal.

  • Falana counsels National Assembly on  amended Constitution

    Falana counsels National Assembly on amended Constitution

    Lagos lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), has urged members of the  National Assembly to remove the objectionable provisions in the Fourth Alteration to the 1999 Constitution.

    The eminent lawyer noted that if they refused to do so before overriding the veto of the President, they would have engaged in a futile exercise, which could be challenged in a law court.

    Falana gave the advice yesterday in Lagos in a statement, titled: Constitutional Amendment: Why the National Assembly Cannot Ignore the President’s Letter.

    The frontline lawyer advised National Assembly members to go back to the drawing table to tackle the fundamental errors that characterised the Fourth Alteration to the Constitution.

    He said: “They (National Assembly) should have no difficulty in jettisoning the alteration of Section 9 of the Constitution, as it is the height of legislative dictatorship to amend the Constitution of a country without the assent of the President and the endorsement of the people via a referendum.

    “While the concern of the legislators for the rights of Nigerians to basic education and health is appreciated, the inclusion of the both rights in Chapter Four of the Constitution is unnecessary as both rights have been statutorily recognised.”

    Falana recalled that President Goodluck Jonathan, last week, decided to veto the Fourth Amendment Bill to the Constitution.

    He noted that the President, in a detailed letter addressed to both chambers of the National Assembly, challenged the legality of the procedure adopted by the legislators in passing the Bill and the constitutional validity of some of the amendments.

    He also noted that several members of the National Assembly had threatened to override the President’s veto in a manner he described as hasty.

    Falana said: “No doubt, the National Assembly has the power to override the President’s veto, if the constitutional requirement is met. But the needless controversy over the constitutional amendment should be handled with caution on the part of the Federal legislators.

    “Apart from the serious observations raised by the President, some of the provisions of the amendment completely negate national interests.

    “Whereas majority of Nigerians have consistently demanded the removal of immunity clause from the Constitution, the amendment seeks to confer immunity on legislators in addition to the heads of the executive arm of government.”

    The lawyer  also referred to the provision of the pension for life for former leaders of the National Assembly provided for in the fourth alteration to the Constitution as another  objectionable proposition.

    He said: “Indeed, one of the former Speakers of the House of Representatives, who will be a beneficiary of the largesse, spent a few months in office and resigned for fear of impeachment. Another retired Speaker, who served for less than four years, is barely 40 years old.”

    He urged the National Assembly to justify why Nigerians should pay pension for life to such legislators for rendering part-time service in the parliament.

    He differed on the insistence of the President that the Amendment Bill should have been with the votes of four-fifths of the National Assembly and approved by the resolution of both chambers with not less than two-thirds of the states of the federation.

    “I had reminded the President that the last three alterations of the Constitution were passed by the two-thirds majority of the federal and state legislators and signed into law by him in 2010 and 2011,” Falana added.

  • Falana advises Assembly  on alterations to constitution

    Falana advises Assembly on alterations to constitution

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana(SAN) has advised the National Assembly to remove the objectionable provisions in the fourth alteration to the 1999 Constitution.

    He said if they refused to do so before overriding the veto of the President, they would have engaged in a futile exercise likely to be challenged in court.

    Falana, in a statement in Lagos yesterday, titled:  “Constitutional Amendment: Why the National Assembly cannot ignore the President’s Letter”,  counselled members to tackle the fundamental errors which characterised the fourth alteration to the Constitution.

    “They should have no difficulty in jettisoning the alteration of Section 9 as it is the height of legislative dictatorship to amend the Constitution  without the assent of the President and endorsement of the people via a referendum.

    “While the concern of the legislators for the rights of Nigerians to basic education and health is appreciated the inclusion of both rights in Chapter 4  is unnecessary as both rights have been statutorily recognised,” he said.

    Falana noted that the President, in a letter addressed to the National Assembly, challenged the legality of the procedure adopted by the legislators in passing the Bill and the constitutional validity of some of the amendments.

    He further noted that a some members have threatened to override the President’s veto in a manner he described as hasty.

    “No doubt, the National Assembly has the power to override the President’s veto if the constitutional requirement is met but the needless controversy over the constitutional amendment should be handled with caution.

    “Apart from the serious observations by the President, some provisions of the amendment completely negate national interests.

    “Whereas many Nigerians have demanded the removal of the immunity clause, the amendment seeks to confer immunity on legislators in addition to the heads of the executive arm of government,” he stated.

    Falana also referred to the pension for life for former National Assembly leaders provided for in the fourth alteration to the Constitution as another  objectionable proposition.

    “ Indeed, one of the former Speakers of the House of Representatives, who will be a beneficiary of the largesse, spent a few months in office and resigned for fear of impeachment. Another retired Speaker, who served for less than four years, is barely 40 years old.”

    He challenged the National Assembly to justify why Nigerians should pay pension for life to such legislators for rendering part-time service.

    The lawyer decried the insistence of the President that the Amendment Bill should have been with the votes of four- fifths of the National Assembly and approved by the resolution of the Houses of Assembly of not less than two-thirds of the states of the federation.

    Falana said: “I had reminded the President that the last three alterations of the Constitution were passed by two-thirds majority of the federal and state legislators and signed into law by him in 2010 and 2011.

    “But the National Assembly acted illegally in amending sections 8, 9 without a resolution backed by four fifths majority of the members.

    “If the Bill had been assented to by the President as proposed by the National Assembly, the entire fourth alteration to the Constitution would have been vitiated.”

    He recalled that in 2010, the National Assembly purportedly empowered itself to amend the Constitution without the assent of the President.

    According to him, the action was challenged in the Federal High Court by a former President of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), adding:  “The court declared the amendment illegal and unconstitutional and proceeded to set it aside”.