Tag: FARMLAND

  • Killer-herdsmen and the logic of accommodation (2)

    Killer-herdsmen and the logic of accommodation (2)

    In an era of an enormous explosion in the population of both humans and cattle, open grazing has proven to be an unsustainable approach to cattle breeding and rearing because of its inherent potentials for conflict. This is not a question of ethnicity or religion. It is simply an economic matter. Provided their herders do not, cattle do not discriminate between grass and crops. They are all food. Neither do they discriminate between the farmlands of Hausa, Fulani, Tiv, Biron, Igbo, Edo or Yoruba. Every farmland they are led through is suitable for feeding. Cattle are equal-opportunity feeders. No one can blame them.

    Now, as for herdsmen, you would expect some modicum of respect for crops on farmland and for the principle of non-trespass on the economic privacy of others. But when legitimate fodder is unavailable, and their cattle are on the verge of starvation, ethical concerns could take the back of the burner. It is a case of competing economic demands where they can get away with it. And since they are not sure that they will easily get away with it, they prudently, even if immorally, arm themselves with AK-47s. It’s the philosophy of armed robbery, isn’t it? Armed robbers claim no moral consciousness. They simply want your good and in case you resist, they must prepare against your stubbornness.

    Farmers, on the other hand, are like homeowners who are defenseless against armed robbers. They only rely on the rule of law and on its enforcers for protection. And while the latter have shirked their responsibilities for far too long in the matter of the atrocities committed by herdsmen, whether foreigners or indigenes, the recent events have called attention to the need for government to wake up.

    Predictably, state governments have taken up the challenge against the backdrop of violence against their residents by herdsmen, with policies ranging from anti-open grazing laws to various forms of accommodation regulations. One such accommodation regulation is the registration of herdsmen in some states and regulations governing sanctions when cattle destroy farm crops. Some states also include laws against cattle rustling or killing by farmers.

    One problem with such regulations is their effectiveness. Chief Olu Falae has been on the receiving end of herdsmen brutality with his kidnapping and the repeated destruction of his crops to the latest case of arson on his farm. While he is certain that herdsmen were responsible, the Police have not been able to identify and arrest the culprits as far as we know. Therefore, the various state efforts to regulate open grazing and prevent conflict and destruction are simply ineffective band-aids on a festering national wound.

    It is because of the realization of the futility of such approaches that some state governors and legislators have gone to the extreme of banning open grazing within the confines of their states. Can we really blame them? They were elected to protect the lives and properties of their citizens and they are simply doing their job how best they know under the circumstances that they face.

    Miyetti-Allah has rejected anti-open grazing laws because it is inimical to the economic well-being of their members. Herdsmen are pastoralists by nature and culture, we are told. Is this true? Herdsmen may be cattle breeders and cattle rearers. But does this commit them to a life of nomadism. The ancient Hebrews, the ancestors of the present citizens of the State of Israel, were cattle breeders and herders. They were as nomadic as our Fulani herdsmen. But Israelites have modernized the art of cattle breeding. As the Minister of Agriculture has also observed, the cattle that is made to travel hundreds of miles on foot are not happy cattle at the end of the journey, that is, if they make it to the end. And what about the waste of the potentials of young men and women condemned to a lifetime of nomadism? Culture is simply not a good argument for open grazing.

    If not open grazing, then, what is the alternative?  Perhaps Miyetti-Allah is not opposed to alternatives to open grazing. Perhaps what they are against is finding and negotiating those alternatives prior to the promulgation of anti-open grazing laws. Granted, but states have limited alternatives. Most of their residents, for whom they are politically and responsible, are farmers, not herders. Again, it is not a matter of ethnicity. They simply do not feel a sense of obligation to non-residents. This is the political reality of a federal system. It is why in the United States, citizenship of the country does not confer on residents the same privileges in different states. For example, non-residents pay higher tuition when they register as students in state colleges other than their own. Thus, a student resident of Maryland pays in-state tuition in Maryland state colleges while a student from New York pays higher non-resident tuition when registered in a Maryland state college.

    Having come to an appreciation of its indispensable role as an arbiter in a matter of great importance that can tear the nation apart, the Federal government has now taken up the matter. But what are the options being canvassed?  First, it came up with the idea of grazing reserves, which was first presented as a bill to the National Assembly in 2008. Second, it toyed with the idea of ranching. Third, it seems that the government has now settled on the idea of cattle colonies.

    Two points are important to note here. First, each of the suggested alternatives-grazing reserves, ranching, cattle colonies-requires the availability of a large landmass and ownership of land across the nation is governed by different customs and conventions. Therefore, the federal government will not find it easy to acquire land simply by fiat. It is gratifying that the Minister of Agriculture has, for all intents and purposes, come to terms with this reality. Second, herdsmen, whose culture and economic needs require to engage in cattle breeding, are only one link in the chain of links in the industry. There are other links including the wealthy businessmen who invest in livestock farming and employ the herdsmen, just as we have commercial famers and the farmhands who are the face of the industry.

    Commercial farmers buy their farmlands from landowners or they lease those lands from state governments. In addition, commercial farmers buy their equipment and the services of agronomists, soil scientists, and technicians. They also use extension services provided by state governments. The question then is this: which of the alternatives of grazing reserves, ranching, and cattle colonies best approximates commercial crop farming?

    Frankly, I do not see the difference between cattle colonies, ranching, and grazing reserves except for the size of the former which, we are told, will be big enough to accommodate several cattle owners. However, as it has become clear since it was thrown up by Minister Ogbeh, beside the substance of its merit or demerit, the idea of cattle colony evokes a negative feeling, and rightly so. Why would a post-colonial enclave, which has continuously decried its colonial history and raged against internal colonization of various kinds, reopen old wounds with this unnecessary flirtation with creating cattle colonies, which Nigerians have mischievously labelled Fulani colonies? Branding is everything and labeling is a huge part of branding.

    Ranching is the global best practice in commercial cattle breeding. Minister Ogbeh says that ranching is “of an individual venture” for herdsmen and investors. But is there a good reason ranching in our peculiar condition cannot be a cooperative venture? After all, we have commercial farming as cooperative ventures. Instead of accommodating several herdsmen and their cattle in colonies, it is more productive to organize them in ranches as cooperatives.

    Miyetti-Allah’s argument against ranching is that it is technologically driven, and the Nigerian climate is unsuitable for ranching. If the latter is true, won’t the same objection apply to cattle colonies? Regarding technology, however, the federal government should deploy the resources it has promised for cattle colonies to ranching with better outcomes of healthy cattle, prosperous herdsmen and a peaceful and united nation.

     

    Follow me on Twitter:

     

    @SegunGbadeg2002

     

    @HarvestDayPubs

     

  • Man protests alleged plot to seize father’s farmland

    Crisis is brewing in Ise Ekiti, headquarters of Ise/Orun Local Government Area of Ekiti State where a farmer, Olomi Arogundade, is fighting hard to avoid being dispossessed of a farmland belonging to his late father.

    Arogundade, 52, is claiming that the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Owoseni Ajayi, is using his powers and position to support another party to take over the land.

    But Ajayi has denied the accusation, saying he was only exercising the constitutional powers bestowed on him by law to ensure that justice is done in the land case already before the court.

    Arogundade described the unfolding scenario as a ‘breach of law and order’ as he lamented the seizure of a farmland allegedly belonging to his father, Suberu Arogundade.

    He revealed that his father, Suberu Arogundade, of Omiomo Street, Ise Ekiti, owned a farm land at Edu village, Agbado Road, Ise Ekiti.

    According to him, Suberu filed a suit before the Magistrate’s Court against Sunday Ogunmuyite and Ojo Ogunmuyite (now deceased) in 2001 with the court delivering judgment on December 5, 2006 in his father’s favour.

    The defendants, according to Arogundade, were represented by Mr. E.K. Omosebi, a lawyer from the chambers of Owoseni Ajayi and Associates-the law firm of the  present Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Ekiti State.

    He claimed that Boyede Ogunmuyite and Toyin Ogunmuyite (the defendants’ children) still continued to trespass on the Edu farmland, unlawfully harvesting crops allegedly belonging to Arogundade, despite the court judgment.

    Counsel to Arogundade, Mr. M. A.   Daramola, explained that “the father of my client was the plaintiff in a land matter, Suit No. ISECC/24/2001:Suberu Arogundade v. Sunday Ogunmuyite and Ojo Ogunmuyite,  determined by the Customary Court, Ise Ekiti and in which judgment was delivered in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in 2006.”

    He noted that “the judgment specifically restrained the defendants, children, wives and whosoever from further trespass to the cocoa farm.

    “Our client, Olomi Arogundade assumed the management of the farm thereafter to take care of his father and family as his father took ill, but the children of the defendants in that case have since been disturbing the lawful enjoyment of the fruit of the judgment.

    “The defendants in that case (who are now late) were represented by Owoseni Ajayi and Associates. The judgment remains binding as there was no appeal against the decision of the court.”

    Daramola said subsequent to 2006 judgment, the children of the defendants of the case-Boyede Ogunmuyite and Toyin Ogunmuyite-still continued to trespass on the farm land, by harvesting crops, issue threat to the life of the child of the plaintiff (Olomi Arogundade).

    He further said: “Consequent upon this, the matter was reported to the police. The police took over the handling of the case with the Chief Magistrate’s Court.

    “Our client is the nominal complainant in the charges. The charges are MIS/25c/2016:C.O.P v. Boyede Ogunmuyite and others and MIS/42c/2016: C O P v. Toyin Ogunmuyite and othes.

    Daramola noted that “the accused persons in the first charge was charged for threat to life while the accused person in the second charge is arraigned for stealing cocoa seeds from the farm of the complainant.

    The lawyer expressed dismay that the state Ministry of Justice suddenly took over the case from police prosecutor “in order to serve the personal interest of the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice” whose chamber has been representing the accused persons”.

    Daramola further explained that for necessary interventions, his client has petitioned the Inspector-General of Police, Director, State Security Service (Ekiti State command), Governor Ayo Fayose, Chief Judge, Ekiti State Judiciary.

    He said his client had earlier forwarded a petition to the Attorney-General to hands off the case and desist from taking over the matter from the police prosecutors who, according to him, consists of lawyers who are capable to prosecute the case competently.

    In his reaction, Ajayi maintained that the position of law is supreme and therefore must be adhered to.

    Ajayi said:  ”The Attorney-General is constitutionally mandated to prosecute all cases and several lawyers do come to complain that their cases are badly handled by the police, and that the Ministry of Justice should take over.

    “We assign lawyers in the Ministry of Justice to take over such matters from the police.”

    On Arogundade’s issue, Ajayi explained that a lawyer from his chambers sought the take-over of the case by the Ministry of Justice “because they don’t have confidence in the way police are handling the matter.”

    Ajayi further explained: “I assigned Barristers Aderiye Yinka Martins and Femi Onipede from the Ministry of Justice to handle the matter based on the petition written by the lawyers to the accused persons.

    ”It was written in the petition that the accused was convicted over a land matter. The accused had earlier been convicted by the same prosecutor, by the same Magistrate over this land matter.

    “Another charge was brought again over the same land matter, where the accused have been convicted. They also brought the third one, by the same prosecutor, by the same Magistrate.

    “Do we say we should not look into the matter, when they consult the Ministry of Justice?”

    On the 2006 judgment that favoured the plaintiff, Ajayi explained that civil matters are different from criminal matters, saying:  ”The issue written on the petition is that the Magistrate went into purely civil matters, whereas no crime is alleged.

    “We have the right to look into the matter. The accused person is saying he did not commit a crime, and these people alleged crime out of civil matters over the same land matter.

    “The counsel to the accused said the Ministry of Justice, which the Constitution has given the power to look into criminal issues, should help them look into the matter. There is no sentiment attached to it.

    “No decision has been taken.  No conclusion has been made.  The only thing is that the Ministry of Justice has taken over the matter so as to look into the merits of it.”

    Ajayi said it is not out of place for a lawyer working in his chambers to write petition to the Ministry of Justice if they observed some lapses in the way police are handling their matters.

    He argued that Owoseni Ajayi and Associates is a law firm independent of Owoseni Ajayi who is Ekiti State Commissioner for Justice.

    However, Daramola and his client (Olomi Arogundade) have declared that “unless justice is allowed to be dispensed without the involvement of the people at the corridors of power, the state may soon start witnessing anarchy and a breakdown of law and order.”

    Arogundade, therefore, called on well-meaning Nigerians to “come to his rescue”, saying all the attempts are to illegally drive them out of the farmland.

     

  • Association decries encroachment of foreigners into cashew farmland

    Association decries encroachment of foreigners into cashew farmland

    The National Cashew Association of Nigeria (NCAN) has expressed dismay over the encroachment of foreigners into cashew farm gates.

    According to the national president of the association, Tola Faseru the federal government has made it clear that cashew is one of the strategic crops that will be used to diversify Nigeria’s economy.

    Faseru who spoke at the 2016 National Cashew Trade Administration Meeting of the association in Ogbomosho, Oyo state noted that the encroachment of foreigners has been causing distractions for local farmers and the consequence of this is low quality of products, reduced value at the international market and most importantly lower purchasing power for Nigerian farmers. “The encroachment into the farm gate by the foreigners is inimical to the value chain system and cuts off our locals from participating in the trade. Expatriates are positioned in the bushes to buy directly from the farmers thereby taking away the much needed jobs from our people.”

    In his remarks, the former governor of Oyo state Chief Adebayo Alao Akala, who was also present at the event, frowned at the practice of foreigners bombarding the farm gates to buy cashew and said this should stop.

    The representative of the Minister of Agriculture Mr. Mathew Omirigbe reassured the association that the federal government is working to see that Nigerian cashew becomes the toast in the International markets.

    The chairman of the NCAN Trade Administration Committee, Alhaji Adeniji Adeyemi expressed his delight at the all inclusive decision made by members in disallowing encroachment of foreigners into cashew farm gates.

  • Ekiti court jails herdsman two years for destroying farm

    Ekiti court jails herdsman two years for destroying farm

    AN Ado-Ekiti Chief Magistrate’s Court yesterday sentenced a herdsman, Ali Haruna, to two years imprisonment for grazing his cows on a farmland.

    The 18-year-old Haruna was sentenced by Chief Magistrate Idowu Ayenimo after he was found guilty of two-count charge of willful and unlawful damage of farm crops at Ago Aduloju settlement on the outskirts of Ado-Ekiti.

    Haruna was first arraigned in court on January 22, 2016 and four witnesses gave evidence against him that he was caught in the farm belonging to Abdullahi Yaho and Bello Muhammed in the midnight, grazing his herd of cows.

    The cash crops destroyed by the cows in the farm included cassava, maize, okro and pepper – all valued at N3 million.

    The defendant, while testifying in court, revealed that the owner of the cows lived in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital.

    The defence counsel, Chris Omokhafe, had prayed the court to be liberal in the dispensation of justice, saying that he was a first offender.

    The magistrate, in his judgment, said the court did not believe Haruna’s defence as it was not credible.

    He held that the police prosecutor, Sgt. Olasunkanmi Bankole, had proved his case beyond reasonable doubt.

    Ayenimo, consequently, convicted the defendant as charged without an option of fine.

    The magistrate ordered that the sentence should run concurrently, explaining that the term was minimal because the offence was committed before the Grazing Law was assented to by Governor Ayo Fayose.

    The Ekiti State House of Assembly recently passed a bill prohibiting open grazing in unauthorised places and also criminalised bearing of arms by herdsmen.

    The bill was sponsored by the Executive after the killing of two persons by suspected herdsmen in Oke Ako community in Ikole Local Government Area.

    The new law criminalises grazing in some places and certain time limit in the state.

    Signing the bill, Fayose said that the new law would check cases of incessant attacks or killings of local residents and destruction of farmlands by herdsmen and their cattle.

    He added that the law would also strengthen security in various communities across the state, adding that anyone that fouled the law stood the risk of being treated as terrorist.

    “With the signing into law of this bill today, anyone caught grazing with arms or any weapon in Ekiti would now be charged with terrorism and be made to face the law according to certain sections of it,” he said.

     

     

  • Farmland cost  rises

    Farmland cost rises

    The price of farmlands  across  the  country  has  been  rising in the  last  one  year  following  increasing  participation  of  foreign  agriculture businesses  and youths  in exploring  emerging  business  opportunities.

    Farmlands consultant, Mr. Debo Thomas, in a chat with The Nation, said Lagos and Ogun states   have seen the biggest increases in land values, recording between 30 to 60 per cent rise between 2012 and 2014.

    He said that the  cost  of outright  purchase  of  lands  have  risen  from N50,000 to  N350,000  in  some  places  in Lagos ,Oyo  and Ogun States ,while  lease has  risen  from N2, 000 to  N15, 000.

    Driving the rise in costs, he  noted,  are increasing  farming   population occasioned  by the influx of foreign investors  acquiring  as  much  as  5, 000 acres of land, mainly on the outskirt such as in Ogbomosho in Oyo state.

    He  said  farmers  are moving  to areas out  of  Lagos  and Ogun States to  Oyo state   where they  can  find farmlands  in areas where    they  can  easily  be linked   to markets connecting  the  major  industry  hub in  the Southwest.

    Thomas  who  has himself  acquired 2, 500 acres in  Ogbomosho and is ready  to give  out  to  prospective  investors  said  farmland is the ultimate store of value as  this  is  pushing  for increasing farmland ownership.

  • Saga  of 15-acre  cemetery  turned  farmland

    Saga of 15-acre cemetery turned farmland

    WHEN human beings die and are buried, they are always said and believed to have gone to rest in peace. But this may not be so for the dead at Ajara Group Cemetery, located in Badagry, a suburb of Lagos State.

    The 15- acre land set aside for the dead in the community for the purpose of making them to enjoy eternal bliss appears to have been hijacked by the living, farmers to be precise. Checks at the cemetery revealed that the dead are obviously not enjoying their rest following the activities of the farmers, who have tilled and planted all manners of crops all around the expansive land.

    The vast cemetery, it was learnt, is divided equally among the three major religions in the country. The farmers planted maize, cassava, vegetables and other crops all around the premises. Interestingly, some residents of the community, who spoke with The Nation, said that the land produces bountiful harvest that provides a number of food items for the people of the area all year round.

    Chief owolabani
    Chief owolabani

    In spite the economic benefits that farming in the cemetery brings to the farmers and the community at large, the traditional chief of the community, Chief Samuel Amosu Owolabani, condemned the practice, describing it as a serious security challenge to the bodies buried in the cemetery. Besides, he said, it is disrespectful to the dead, especially in this part of the world for anybody to turn their resting place to a farm.

    “I am aware that people are farming there. It was brought to my notice by members of the community. It is not good for anybody to go and be farming in the cemetery because that is not what it is meant for. It poses a serious security threat because those farmers have unrestrained access to the environment. What if any of them has any ulterior motive apart from going in there to farm? I really don’t know the farmers because I cannot leave my house here to go and be monitoring what is happening at the cemetery.

    “Apart from security challenge, it is also a mark of disrespect for the dead. In this part of the world, we have deep respect for the dead. It does not matter that they are no more living, they deserve our respect. Therefore, the farmers are not showing any respect to the departed souls at all by going to their resting place to cultivate the land,” he said.

    He dismissed the claim that the activities of the farmers support the community’s food supply, saying: “What quantity of farm produce do they bring from there? It is just 15 acres of land and what quantity do you think they will come up with that will make or mar the supply of food in our markets? We have other farms in the area, so the claim is unfounded”.

    A resident of the community, who gave his name as Sunday, alleged that the bountiful harvest may partly be connected to the natural manure which the decomposed bodies of the dead people buried in the area may have provided for the earth.

    “The cemetery, which ordinarily should be a no go area for the living, surprisingly has become a place where our people cultivate and grow crops. Some of the farmers make use of fertilisers but it is not impossible that the organic manure provided by the decomposed dead bodies could be aiding the fertility of the ground which, in turn, makes it possible for the farmers to have good harvest.

    “If you look critically at the premises, you would find that some of the graves are not cemented. After some time, such graves that are not cemented will be flattened by weather conditions such as rain fall and other human activities. When this happens, hardly would anybody know that it is a grave. When you now plant crops on it, you can be sure that they would produce a bountiful harvest,” he said.

    Anthony, another resident of the area, hinted that there are more than 100 people that are farming in the cemetery. He pointed out that most of the farmers are doing it for commercial purposes and not just for subsistence. “There are more than 100 people that are farming in the cemetery. When you come go round the compound, you will see both men and women tilling the ground.

    “The quantity of vegetable they produce is massive. To be sincere with you, the entire community benefits from their bravely. When they harvest their produce, they sell at cheaper rates than what others that bring similar goods from farther places would sell. I said this because it is not a mean feat for anybody to go into a cemetery and be farming because it can be frightening to be such a place.

    “You can blame that on hardship and desperation on the part of the people to legitimately earn a living. If there were sufficient land for the people to farm, they would never condescend to the level of going into a cemetery to farm.”

    He also said that decomposed bodies from graves that are not cemented could be aiding the fertility of the land, adding: “It is very easy for the farmers to be innocently planting on graves that are not cemented after they have been levelled by weather conditions. But it may not be possible for them to be planting on cemented graves .When weather condition levels a grave, a farmer would not be doing anything wrong if he plants his crops on it because he might be doing so unknowingly.”

    Some of the farmers, who spoke with our correspondent, however, denied planting on and around the graves. One of them explained: “We don’t plant on or around the graves at all. If you find any crops growing on or around a grave, then, it must have sprung up on its own.

    If you are familiar with farming, you will know that what I have told you is true. But when such a crop matures and one sees it, it would be better harvested because if you don’t do that, it will rot away. But the truth is that we always make sure that we move away from where graves are when doing our cultivation.

    “It is not also true that the decomposed bodies of the people buried at the cemetery serve as manure for us. How can dead bodies buried in some parts of the cemetery serve as manure for this whole place?

    “It is not possible, although it is possible that they will be improving the fertility of the immediate surroundings of where they are buried; even if the dead bodies improve the fertility of the whole place, it cannot stop us from using fertiliser.  Most of us, if not all, use fertiliser because it boosts our crops and enhances our harvest.”

    Another farmer, who spoke with The Nation, said he did not take to farming in the cemetery because he wanted to spite the dead. “I took to farming in the cemetery because the whole place was at a point in time a very thick bush, even though dead bodies were buried there. It was totally neglected and because some of us have interest in farming, we went in there to clear a good part of it and started farming. If you look round, you will see that some parts are still very bushy.

    “Those are the parts that nobody deemed it fit to clear. If we did not do what we did, the whole place would have been a jungle by now and the neighbours would not have been able to sleep with their eyes closed,” he narrated.

    He added that: “In spite of our activities in the cemetery, some of the neighbours still complain that snakes and other reptiles still come out of the place to their places. Imagine if we have not done what we did, would more dangerous not be a regular visitor to their homes on a daily basis?

    “Apart from dangerous animals, other nocturnal creatures would have been residing in the bush if we did not open up the place. Such creatures and hoodlums always like bushy environments because their activities thrive in darkness and shady places.”

     

    Asked if she does not get frightened farming in the cemetery, Bose, one of the female farmers, responded: “I was when I first started because of all the things I had heard and watched in home videos about how dead used to appear to people. Then, my heart would be filled with all manners of thoughts about ghosts and before I knew it, my head would begin to swell and that would automatically bring the day’s work to an end because I would have no alternative than to run away from the cemetery. It took time before I overcame it. Today, I have no such fears again because my mind has been disabused of the previous thoughts that used to paralyse me.”

    But her male counterpart, who gave his name as Osawe, said he had never had any reason to fear about anything since he started working in the cemetery. “Why do I have to be scared of any dead person or a ghost? If a ghost appears to me, I would ask him if I was the one that killed him. I would simply ask him to leave me alone and go and meet his killer.

    “Since I have no hand in any of their deaths, they cannot even appear to me. I really have nothing to be afraid about. All I do is to come here and do my work and after that, I go back to my house,” he said.

     

    Why the cemetery was established

    Before the cemetery was established over a decade ago, Chief Owolabani recalled that the people were used to burying their dead family members in their compounds. He recounted his reason for establishing the cemetery thus: “I took the decision after a member of the community had an ugly experience in his place of residence. He had rented the apartment without any knowledge that the place was previously a grave yard. After sometime of living in the apartment, it started sinking.

    “Subsequently, he started seeing dry human bones from the sinking apartment. It was then that it dawned on him that he had rented an apartment that was built on a grave. When the news got to me, I felt it is not good in this civilised world for people to continue to have such unpalatable experience. That was why I decided to give out 15 acres of land for the community to establish a cemetery.”

    He confirmed that the cemetery is divided into three equal parts for each of the dominant religions in the area. He expatiated that the decision to do so was arrived after some members of the different religions began to complain that they did not like the manner the others were carrying out their burial rites.

    “To avoid unnecessary conflicts, I decided that each of the three religions should have five acres each for the burial of their members. So, if you get there now, you will find that Christians have their place for burying their dead members, the same with Muslims and the traditional worshippers.”

    Going down memory lane, he said: “Ajara group comprises 13 town and villages. It is only Ajara Topa that is my domain that provided the land for the cemetery.  The land was previously under the Western Region and after the creation of states, it fell under the control of Lagos State.

    “During the military regime of Olagunsoye Oyinlola, some of the land acquired by the government was released to Ajara Topa community. It was from what was released to us that I gave out the 15 acres for the establishment of the cemetery.

    “No any other group within Ajara could provide such expanse of land. After the cemetery was built, we accepted that other neigbouring communities could be coming there to bury their departed ones. We, however, ruled out people from distant places to come there and bury people.”

    CEMENTRY.

    Controversy over maintenance of cemetery

    Chief Owolabani, however, lamented the bushy state of the cemetery, saying: “The cemetery is bushy because the local council in the area is not taking care of it. It is a shame on the community. About three years ago, I brought people from the Republic of Benin to clear the cemetery. Through communal efforts, we paid the sum of N120, 000 for that.

    “We are waiting for the rainy season to be over so that we can go there and clear the place. When we go back to the cemetery to do the clearing, both the bush and the farms would be cleared. I have only kept mute about their activities all along because they have helped in clearing the bush to a very good extent. If not for them, the whole place would have remained a thick bush.”

    Despite his claim that the local council does not show any concern about the state of the cemetery, he alleged that the officials have not ceased to collect money from people who are coming there to bury their relations. “They used to demand huge sums of money from bereaved families before they would be allowed to bury their dead in the cemetery that they do not bother about its state.

    “A member of the community from Ajara Vedo came to me about two weeks ago to complain that he paid N27, 000 for a space to bury his deceased family member but was issued a receipt of N5,000.He would not be the first to make such a complaint to me. I have a number of receipts that other people have submitted to me complaining of similar development. I have written a petition to the council to that effect. That was not our objective of setting up the cemetery.

    “As a community, our plan was to ask those that want to bury their deceased relations to pay a token that we can always use to maintain the cemetery. Unfortunately, the local council that collects the money from the people is not interested in the improvement of the cemetery. Like I said earlier, I am only waiting for the rains to subside before going back there to clear the place and make it to serve the purpose for which it was strictly established.”

    The allegation was, however, debunked by a top council member, who did not want his name in prints. He said: “As civil servants, we are not permitted to grant interviews. However, I want to categorically tell you that all they said were mere allegations that cannot be substantiated. The onus is on those that are making the allegation to prove it.

    “How can the council give a demand notice of N27, 000 and issue a receipt of N5, 000 and the person will not complain immediately? The challenge that our society has is that people are always out to cut corners. When they are told that something would cost X amount, they would want to reduce it. If that person is issued a receipt that is different from what he paid, would he have the moral courage to complain? He would not because he has also compromised by not agreeing to pay the official charges.”

    He also reacted to the alleged abandonment of the cemetery by the council. “It is equally not true that the council does not clear the cemetery of the bush that is there. The land for building the cemetery might have been given by the community but the truth is that the council is directly in charge of it because it is constitutional that places like cemeteries and markets should be under the supervision of local governments.

    “We have been clearing the cemetery from time to time but the challenge is that we have four cemeteries in this area. When we clear one and move to the other, the one earlier cleared would have grown before we complete the circle and return to it. The natives, Eegun people, are the ones farming on the land and they are resident in the area. No stranger goes there to farm. There must have been an issue that cropped up among them that led to all these issues.”

  • Man seeks compensation for alleged farmland destruction

    A farmer, Mr. Adewale Adewuyi, has written the Inspector-General of Police, Mr. Mohammed Abubakar demanding N650million compensation for the “illegal” destruction of his farmland in Age-Mowo Village, Badagry, Lagos State, by the police on December 17, 2013.

    His counsel, Mr. Debo Adeleke, who wrote the pre-action letter dated January 16, 2014, on his behalf, gave police till February 21 to pay the money, failure which he threatened to go to court.

    The lawyer claimed that his 68-year-old client had obtained all necessary title documents for the piece of land, before the police invasion aimed at acquiring the piece of land for the Nigeria Police Officers’ Wives Association.

    “Take notice that should the Nigeria Police Force and/or the Federal Government of Nigeria fail, neglect, refuse or delay in paying the said amount on or before February 21, 2014, we shall not hesitate to institute a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against the Nigeria Police Force, Nigeria Police Officers’ Wives Association and/or the Federal Government of Nigeria to seek legal redress for our client,” the letter reads.

    Adeleke claimed that his client had acquired the piece of land, measuring 21 acres (10 hectares), from the Lagos State government through a letter of allocation dated August 12, 1988 and with Reference Number, ALHA/AGRIC. 2100/11.

    He added that the government also issued to his client a Certificate of Occupancy with Reference Number, AGRI/LAND/C of O/2100 on January 15, 1993.

    “On December 17, 2013, scores of armed policemen and their privies invaded the farm with bulldozers and embarked on an unprovoked and mindless orgy of unbelievable destruction and despoliation of the farm,” the lawyer stated in the letter.

    He said a lot of his client’s livestock, submersible pumping machines along with generators were missing while much property, including staff quarters for about 120 farm workers, fish ponds and livestock houses were destroyed during the police invasion.

    He said Adewuyi was recuperating from the ill health he suffered the day after the police invasion.

    Adeleke said: “Upon being informed about the invasion and destruction, he (Adewuyi) collapsed, fainted and was rushed to the hospital by some of his farm workers, when he realised that the farm, his life pursuit, and labour for nearly 30 years, had been utterly destroyed.

    “He was only discharged from the hospital on January 10, 2014. He is an out-patient now and the state of his health is still very precarious.”