Tag: fatherhood

  • Fatherhood crisis

    Several years ago, I used to sit “at the feet” of a retired war time army general discussing various societal issues, especially the problems of Nigeria. In one of our discussions, a guest joined us and informed the general that his son – who was a commissioner in his home state – has been accused of embezzling public funds. Without blinking an eye lid, the general said: “that can never happen, I didn’t raise my sons to be thieves. Go and tell the governor to investigate him.” He continued our discussion as if nothing had happened.

    About a month later, the general – who is now late – sent for me and handed me an open newspaper without uttering a word; there was also another newspaper on his lap. The news story I read was the outcome of a probe panel set up by the state government to investigate if the commissioner (the late general’s son), or his accomplices embezzled public funds. When I was done reading the first story, he handed me the second newspaper.

    The news story – which was about the panel report – did not find the commissioner culpable in any act of embezzlements of public fund and he was allowed to continue serving the state in that capacity.  The second story – a feature story written by the same reporter – was quite detailed from an entirely different angle. The reporter focused on the family background of all those accused – that is the commissioner and his perceived accomplices. That of the commissioner was quite instructive.

    The reporter wrote about the general, his long years of impeccable service in the military with particular reference to his civil war records and how he treated his men. He also focused on the commissioner’s other brothers and how they are excelling in their chosen fields of endeavour. What he succeeded in doing was to draw a strong correlation between ones conduct and the family one was raised in. He did this without even interviewing the general; he only interviewed close associates of both the general and his son which further added impetus to his report.

    After I finished reading the two stories, he delivered a strong sermon on fatherhood to me which has been helping me since I became a father myself. He told me he was confident in the sons and daughters he raised ensuring they lived, not only within their means, but to be content with whatever they have. He also informed me that he taught them not to focus on his earthly properties but strive to have theirs and train their own children along that line. I wasn’t surprised when he passed on that his house was put up for rent – all because his children were encouraged to strive for theirs or rent one until they have theirs.

    Slightly over a year ago, I – alongside other customers – was on the queue at a supermarket waiting to pay for purchases made when a young man in his twenties walked past all of us to the cashier to make payment. The gentleman in front politely asked him if he’s not aware of the other people in the queue. He simply waved and said “so?” The visibly angry man pushed him away and told him to join the queue. He was trying to cause a scene when we all insisted he joined the queue. He didn’t but simply walked away.

    I have witnessed incidences of queue jumping and other deep societal challenges to arrive at the conclusion that we may be facing a fatherhood crisis in the country. Many of our young men and women are behaving as if they do not have fathers. As a result, we should – more than ever – be concentrating on the family backgrounds of those committing crimes in the country. I will also like to encourage my colleagues in the media to go the extra mile – like the reporter of the general’s son did – to investigate the family backgrounds of those that have been involved in looting our treasuries. Isn’t it time we seriously look in this direction?

    Why are most families struggling and suffering? They are because fathers are absent and their absence impacts the critical development of their sons and daughters. Fathers are as much critical to their daughters as well as their mothers. Obviously, fathers provide half the genetic material for personality development. Studies show that fathers are primary and most valuable support persons for the mother during pregnancy and childbirth. Also a healthy relationship between children and their fathers are important for good development.

    Children from homes with absentee fathers are more likely to run away from home or live on the street. Studies have shown that achievement level, sense of mastery, and marital happiness of girls correlate with the presence of an involved father. Security regarding females and their fathers is a key element since it greatly shapes their development

    Dearth of statistics aside, I am convinced that millions of Nigerian fathers struggle as adult parents because they lacked a model of effective fathering in their own lives. Men who experienced this form of parental neglect from their own families of origin oftentimes becomes emotionally and physically absent to their own families formed through marriage.

    There is thus the importance of preparing such fathers for fathering by first helping them overcome detached relationships they had with their own fathers. One would argue that the key to becoming a father isn’t merely commitment to wife, children and family, but about prior and primal step of manhood in becoming a son.

    Without realising it, a lady in a public transport I was in blurted out: “they will not allow you have peace if you don’t have a son, are all these not sons?” She was referring to a group of miscreants popularly referred to as “area boys” squabbling over a bag that they apparently snatched from a lady. Though everyone in the bus burst out laughing, but the import of what the lady said should ring out loud. Apparently, she must have been harassed by her in laws for not producing a male child.

    The “area boys” syndrome should point us in the direction that we are a people under siege; siege of illegitimate fathers who continue to have children they can’t cater for. The kids drop out of school, start to roam the streets, end up at bus stops and begin to eek a living as touts. Soon they are old enough to impregnate a girl. The girl gives birth to another tout/area boy or another girl that would almost certainly be impregnated by a tout. And the cycle continues creating an endless supply of terrorists, gangsters and pimps for the underworld.

    Beyond traditional fatherhood, we are now dealing with another crisis – single parenthood. Look around you and it will surprise you the number of single ladies that now have children. Most often than not, the fathers of these children are hardly present – that is those who accept responsibility in the first place.

    Demographic studies on father’s absence and divorce indicate that children – especially boys – growing up without fathers usually have problems in the areas of sex-role and gender-identity development, school performance, physical adjustment, and perhaps in the control of anger and aggression. Equally too, the age at which a daughter loses her father is meaningful since it influences her perception of male, the world as well as her academic advancement – all because of missing the key element of a father.

    A single mom raising her son alone once told to me her son has no contact with his biological father. As a result, she notices he has hostility toward his father based on very limited past contact. She went further to explore emotional and social consequences the absence of a father is having on him.

  • Fatherhood crisis (2)

    Fatherhood crisis (2)

    “Sir, is it a crime not to have a son?” was the question a reader posed when she called to react to my article last week. Of course it can’t be a crime, was my instant reply. That was how a normal phone conversation turned personal and emotional. My intention was to conclude today with some nuggets I have learned on fatherhood over the years, but all that changed with four ladies calling and raising the same issue – their inability to produce a male child.

    They were challenged to voice out their concern after reading what the lady in the public transport I quoted last said regarding male children; they said they can easily identify with her outburst. The lady whose story I’m about to recount is quite touching. She met her husband ten years ago in Port Harcourt before they relocated to Lagos when he got a well-paying job. She describes him as a “cosmopolitan gentleman” who has no room for some of our culture and belief system, even regarding male children.

    Their ten year marriage produced two girls; and given the penchant for a male child, she was worried and voiced her concern to her husband who always brushes it off. He was content with his girls and would do everything possible to ensure they get the best education. He invested on their behalf and has opened bank accounts with millions in there for them. But all this changed in December 2015 when they went home for the Christmas holiday.

    On getting back, she discovered her husband became distant and every conversation always ends with “I wish I had a male child.” As a result, she has been trying to get pregnant again with the hope she might have a male child – albeit unsuccessfully so far. He started keeping late nights and snaps easily; this is now affecting their daughters negatively.

    “I am prepared for the worst and won’t be surprised if he comes home one day and say he has a child with another woman,” she concludes. The discussion with the other ladies followed this trajectory, but not as detailed and emotional like the former. I encouraged the ladies to keep the faith with just one example from The Bible since they were all Christians – the story of the daughters of Zelophehad as recorded in the book of Numbers 27:1-11. This is one of my favourite stories because of the lessons therein. Readers who are not Christians should read on as there are lessons in leadership, faith and boldness to learn.

    Numbers 27 is the appeal of Zelophehad’s five daughters – Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah and Tirzah – to Moses in regard to their inheritance. Their father had died without any sons, and under the law of the time, his daughters were left without an inheritance. The commentators who go into this say that such an appeal was virtually unheard of because at that time a woman’s role in society was only slightly higher than a child’s.

    Moses – the Bible stated – does two very interesting things. He not only hears the appeal of these ladies, he humbly admits that he did not know the answer. He takes it to God, and God not only hears it, He gives the ladies more than what they asked for, as all they had asked for was the land. God says, in effect, “Not only can you have the land, but you have the right to pass it on just as if you were Zelophehad’s sons.” It came under their power completely.

    The point is that no leader under God can afford not to listen with fullest attention to the appeals of the lowly or to their counsel. He cannot afford to be in an attitude in which he will not listen to the people that he is supposed to be leading. It is a very important lesson and principle of law that comes out of Moses’ humility, meekness, and willingness to hear, whereas other leaders of his day would likely have not even allowed those women to come into their presence.

    Even though the Bible didn’t go into details, one can conjecture what happened that faithful day when these daring daughters caused a bloodless revolution and forced the Almighty God to rewrite the rules regarding inheritance. Would this have happened if the women were timid and accept all what was thrown at them without question? I doubt seriously if that were to be the case. Anytime I read that story I always picture the kind of man Zelophehad was; and better still his wife who was not even mentioned in the story.

    What even made these girls hope like they did? What made them think they ever had a chance to inherit this land? Everything looked against them. No one had ever contemplated a situation like this before. But something made them realise that there was at least a chance that, if they asked, they could have their inheritance. And they determined to ask. Now, what was it that made them hope like that? I hope that you read your Bibles with what has been called the gift of sanctified imagination. The Bible is intended to be read that way – that you fill in some of the details with a bit of imagination and yet guided by the lines that are set forth in the stories involved.

    Despite assumptions that relatives might have approached him to take another wife that will bear him a son, Zelophehad must have looked the other way and told his daughters that they were special even though they were not men. He must have taught them to be submissive to their husbands – as scripture teaches – and to be partners in training their children. He may have even sent them to the best Ivy League university in the land. He also must have taught them to speak against injustice when they see one; but thy must do this humbly and submissively with fact to back it up –which was what they eventually did.

    On the flip side, I praise and admire Moses for his foresight. Perhaps there were some hardliners who would have appealed to him not to ‘rock the boat’ by giving the women audience because they have no right to be anywhere near the tent of meeting in the first place. But not Moses, he was a leader to the core.

    There are only two cases in the life of Moses in which a woman came before him for either a judgment or in accusation. This was one of them, and the other one was his sister, Miriam. We know what happened to Miriam. It makes for an interesting contrast.

    Moses could have done several things.  He could have just ignored them and hope they went away.  He could have said that women had no right to speak at the tent of the meeting and sent them away.  He could have also said that women have no right to own property, after all women themselves are property, so how can property possibly own property, therefore they have no right to own appeal and sent them away.  Moses could have just taken the easy way out, and said that the law is the law and there is nothing which can be done about it and sent the women back to their tents.  Or, another option, which is the one he took, and really is the most shocking of the options, is to take the request seriously and to ask for a ruling on it, because what we really have here is a legal situation looking for some clarification.

    So Moses goes to God.  And God says that the daughters of Zelophehad are right in what they ask for and thus a new set of inheritance laws. Instructively, this land these women were asking for, they had never seen. In chapter 26, the Promised Land was being divided amongst the people. The generation that went before them were fearful about entering the Promised Land and as a consequence they all died in the wilderness and did not get to enter the Promised Land.

    But the daughters of Zelophehad were determined to enter and a new law gave them the right.

  • Fatherhood crisis

    Fatherhood crisis

    Several years ago, I used to sit “at the feet” of a retired war-time army General discussing various societal issues, especially the problems of Nigeria. In one of our discussions, a guest joined us and informed the General that his son – who was a commissioner in his home state – has been accused of embezzling public funds. Without blinking an eye lid, the General said: “That can never happen, I didn’t raise my sons to be thieves. Go and tell the governor to investigate him.” He continued our discussion as if nothing had happened.

    About a month later, the General – who is now late – sent for me and handed me an open newspaper without uttering a word; there was also another newspaper on his lap. The news story I read was the outcome of a probe panel set up by the state government to investigate if the commissioner (the late general’s son), or his accomplices, embezzled public funds. When I was done reading the first story, he handed me the second newspaper.

    The news story – which was about the panel’s report – did not find the commissioner culpable in any act of embezzlements of public fund and he was allowed to continue serving the state in that capacity. The second story – a feature story written by the same reporter – was quite detailed from an entirely different angle. The reporter focused on the family background of all those accused – that is the commissioner and his perceived accomplices.That of the commissioner was quite instructive.

    The reporter wrote about the General, his long years of impeccable service in the military with particular reference to his Civil War records and how he treated his men. He also focused on the commissioner’s brothers and how they are excelling in their chosen fields of endeavour. What he succeeded in doing was to draw a strong correlation between one’s conduct and the family one is raised in. He did this without even interviewing the General; he only interviewed close associates of both the General and his son which further added impetus to his report.

    After I finished reading the two stories, he delivered a strong sermon on fatherhood to me, which has been helping me since I became a father myself. He told me he was confident in the sons and daughters he raised, ensuring they lived, not only within their means, but to be content with whatever they have. He also informed me that he taught them not to focus on his earthly properties but strive to have theirs and train their own children along that line. I wasn’t surprised when he passed on that his house was put up for rent – all because his children were encouraged to strive for theirs or rent one until they have theirs.

    Slightly over a year ago, I – alongside other customers – was on the queue at a supermarket waiting to pay for purchases made when a young man in his 20s walked past all of us to the cashier to make payment. The gentleman in front politely asked him if he’s not aware of the other people in the queue. He simply waved and said “so?” The visibly angry man pushed him away and told him to join the queue. He was trying to cause a scene when we all insisted he joined the queue. He didn’t but simply walked away.

    I have witnessed incidences of queue jumping and other deep societal challenges to arrive at the conclusion that we may be facing a fatherhood crisis in the country. Many of our young men and women are behaving as if they do not have fathers. As a result, we should – more than ever – be concentrating on the family backgrounds of those committing crimes in the country. I will also like to encourage my colleagues in the media to go the extra mile – like the reporter of the general’s son did – to investigate the family backgrounds of those that have been involved in looting our treasuries. Isn’t it time we seriously look in this direction?

    Why are most families struggling and suffering? They are because fathers are absent and their absence impacts the critical development of their sons and daughters. Fathers are as much critical to their daughters as well as their mothers. Obviously, fathers provide half the genetic material for personality development. Studies show that fathers are primary and most valuable support persons for the mother during pregnancy and childbirth. Also a healthy relationship between children and their fathers are important for good development.

    Children from homes with absentee fathers are more likely to run away from home or live on the street. Studies have shown that achievement level, sense of mastery, and marital happiness of girls correlate with the presence of an involved father. Security regarding females and their fathers is a key element since it greatly shapes their development

    Dearth of statistics aside, I am convinced that millions of Nigerian fathers struggle as adult parents because they lacked a model of effective fathering in their own lives. Men who experienced this form of parental neglect from their own families of origin oftentimes becomes emotionally and physically absent to their own families formed through marriage.

    There is thus the importance of preparing such fathers for fathering by first helping them overcome detached relationships they had with their own fathers. One would argue that the key to becoming a father isn’t merely commitment to wife, children and family, but about prior and primal step of manhood in becoming a son.

    Without realising it, a lady in a public transport I was in blurted out: “they will not allow you have peace if you don’t have a son, are all these not sons?” She was referring to a group of miscreants popularly referred to as “area boys” squabbling over a bag that they apparently snatched from a lady. Though everyone in the bus burst out laughing, but the import of what the lady said should ring out loud. Apparently, she must have been harassed by her in laws for not producing a male child.

    The “area boys” syndrome should point us in the direction that we are a people under siege; siege of illegitimate fathers who continue to have children they can’t cater for. The kids drop out of school, start to roam the streets, end up at bus stops and begin to eek a living as touts. Soon they are old enough to impregnate a girl. The girl gives birth to another tout/area boy or another girl that would almost certainly be impregnated by a tout. And the cycle continues creating an endless supply of terrorists, gangsters and pimps for the underworld.

    Beyond traditional fatherhood, we are now dealing with another crisis – single parenthood. Look around you and it will surprise you the number of single ladies that now have children. Most often than not, the fathers of these children are hardly present – that is those who accept responsibility in the first place.

    Demographic studies on father’s absence and divorce indicate that children – especially boys – growing up without fathers usually have problems in the areas of sex-role and gender-identity development, school performance, physical adjustment, and perhaps in the control of anger and aggression. Equally too, the age at which a daughter loses her father is meaningful since it influences her perception of male, the world as well as her academic advancement – all because of missing the key element of a father.

    A single mom raising her son alone once told me that her son had no contact with his biological father. As a result, she notices he has hostility toward his father based on very limited past contact. She went further to explore emotional and social consequences the absence of a father is having on him.

  • How fatherhood tamed Terry G

    How fatherhood tamed Terry G

    GABRIEL ‘Terry G’ Amanyi, a.k.a Spiritual Ginjah, the prolific singer and producer of hit songs like Free Madness and father of a two-month-old son, spoke on how fatherhood has changed a whole lot about him in an interview recently. He says it has made him more coordinated, giving him a wider view of life and he also said that he has to be more responsible so that his son can be proud of who he is.

    When asked if he wanted his son to become a musician like him, he simply responded that he would love him to become a footballer because that was what he wanted for himself but he had no sponsors then, so he diverted into music and said he would go to any length to sponsor his son so he could become one of the greatest footballers to walk the face of the earth.

    Talking about his soon-to-be released album titled Book of Ginjah, Terry G describes each track as a chapter and says he has eighteen tracks on it, making it eighteen chapters. “I called them ‘chapters’ instead of tracks because each shows that I am capable of taking music from any angle. The album also has ‘love songs’ on it with the video for one of them already shot,” he further explained.