Tag: Federal High Court in Abuja

  • FG urges court to ignore Moro’s claim of ill-health

    FG urges court to ignore Moro’s claim of ill-health

    The Federal Government Wednesday objected to plea for bail by former Interior Minister, Abba Moro and two other persons being tried over the 2014 botched recruitment exercise of the Nigerian Immigration Services (NIM).

    The government, acting through the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to ignore claim of ill-health made by Moro, and on which basis he had sought to be granted bail.

    Moro, a former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry, Mrs Anastasia M. Daniel Nwobia, F. O. Alaiyegbami and Drexel Tech Nigeria Limited were on Monday, arraigned before the court on an 11-count charge.

    They were accused of defrauding 675, 675 graduate applicants of about N675,675,000 having been made to pay N1000 each as processing fees for 5,000 (five thousand) job openings.

    The four defendants also were accused of breaching the Public Procurement Act, No. 65 of 2007 in the award of the contract for the organisation of the recruitment test to Drexel Tech Nigeria Ltd.

    Although they pleaded not guilty to the charge, Justice Anwuli Chikere ordered the remand of Moro and Alaiyegbami in Kuje prison, Abuja and allowed Mrs. Daniel Nwobia, said to be a nursing mother, to remain on the bail earlier granted her by the EFCC, pending the determination of their bail applications.

    Wednesday, parties argued for and against the grant of bail to the defendants, with the EFCC cautioning the court to refuse the bail applications on the ground that the defendants could tamper with the prosecution process and witnesses.

    Although Moro claimed, in his bail application, to suffering from acute diabetes and high blood pressure, the EFCC, in its counter –counter affidavit, faulted such claim, arguing that, while in its custody, and throughout investigation of the case, Moro neither  complained of ill-health nor was he treated for any ailment.

    EFFC also faulted Moro’s pledged to abide by the bail conditions and attend trial, stating that it had to revoke  the administrative bail earlier granted him (Moro) “as information received from the investigating team revealed that the applicant would interfere with investigation and prosecution process embarked upon by the respondent.

    An EFCC investigator, Isa Joshua, stated in a supporting affidavit, that “investigation conducted revealed that the defendant/applicant conspired with the other defendants to induce the said delivery of the said funds by job applicants, while deliberately neglecting to comply with extant provisions relating to procurement process as the Minister of Interior in relation to the award of contract for the recruitment exercise.

    “Investigation also revealed that the defendant/applicant conspired with other defendants to award contract for the provision of online enlistment and recruitment services to Drexel Tech Nigeria Limited without advertising the contract, without needs assessment and procurement plan, and through selective tendering procedure, by inviting four firms without seeking approval by Bureau of Public Procurement and the fact that the company was not responsive to mandatory prequalification.

    “The defendant/applicant conspired with other defendants to award contract for the provision of online enlistment and recruitment services to Drexel Tech Nigeria Limited, knowing that the company had no legal capacity to enter into the contract,” Joshua said.

    It told the court that Moro would frustrate its effort to apprehend others involved in the alleged crime as they were currently being trailed by its operatives.

    Justice Chikere, who ordered Moro and Alaiyegbami to return to prison, will rule on the bail applications today.

    Shortly after the court’s proceedings, Moro’s supporters, mostly young men and women, who wore T-shirts, with the ex-Interior Minister’s picture printed on them, sang his praise as he was led to a waiting prison van. The unruly supporters, some of who wept as he Moro was being led away, and prison officials attacked journalists, who were trying to capture Moro’s exit with their cameras.

  • BREAKING: Biafra: Judge backs out of Kanu’s case

    BREAKING: Biafra: Judge backs out of Kanu’s case

    The Judge at the Federal High Court in Abuja has exempted himself from hearing the case against the embattled leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mr. Nnamdi Kanu.

    The Judge, Justice Ahmed Mohammed announced the decision on Wednesday in Abuja, following the fresh six-count charges filled by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    Justice Mohammed, who decided to step down on the case Kanu’s objection to the case, said that it was needless, as the federal government had repeatedly disobeyed previous court rulings.

    It would be recalled that Kanu was charged before the Federal High Court, Abuja alongside two others, Benjamin Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi in a fresh six-count charge of treason and managing the affairs of ‘an unlawful society.’

    The IPOB leader, who was arraigned before Justice Mohammed, told the court on Wednesday before commencement of the prosecution’s plea that he preferred being held in detention, than subjecting himself to a trial, which outcome will not be respected.

    He said his previous trials had various outcomes that were abused or neglected by the office of the State Security Service (SSS).

    The counsel to the prosecution, who is also the Federal Director of Prosecution, office of the Attorney General, Mohamed Diri, told the court that based on section 396 (2) of the constitution, the defendant had no right to object to being tried by the court until after the plea is heard.

    Meanwhile, Justice Mohammed who said he was opting out of the case also countered the prosecution counsels, saying that Mr. Kanu had the right to reject the trial, “after all justice is rooted on confidence,” he said.

    “If any of the parties has no confidence in the court, he has the right to say so”, Mr. Mohammed ruled, noting that the prosecution would have done the same thing if they were in Kanu’s shoes.

    “Assuming it was the prosecution, if they had no confidence in the court of jurisdiction; would they not have done so?

    “I hereby remit the case file to the honourable chief judge of this court to reassign it,” the judge summed.