Tag: Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS)

  • FIRS fire contained as probe begins in Abuja office

    FIRS fire contained as probe begins in Abuja office

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has confirmed that a fire incident occurred at one of its offices in Abuja yesterday morning, with no loss of life recorded.

    The incident which occurred at the FIRS office located at No. 15 Sokode Cresent, Wuse Zone 5, Abuja, was said to have broken out on the fourth floor of the building.

    In a statement issued yesterday by the Technical Assistant (Print Media) to the Executive Chairman of FIRS, Sikiru Akinola, the Service said the situation was swiftly brought under control through the prompt action of security personnel and emergency responders.

    “The fire, which broke out on the fourth floor of the building, was promptly responded to by our security personnel on duty,” Akinola said.

    He explained that the timely intervention of the Federal Capital Territory Fire Service, alongside other emergency agencies, ensured that the fire did not escalate or spread to other parts of the building. According to him, “with the swift support of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Fire Service and other emergency responders, the fire was successfully contained and prevented from spreading further.”

    Read Also: Tinubu lauds Zulum’s development drive during Borno visit

    Akinola confirmed that no casualties were recorded in the incident, adding that all staff and occupants were safe. However, he noted that some offices on the affected floor suffered damage as a result of the fire.

    “The Service can confirm that no lives were lost in the incident. However, a number of offices on the affected floor sustained damage,” he said.

    The affected floor houses the executive office suites of past Executive Chairmen of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, though the extent of the damage is still being assessed.

    Meanwhile, an investigation has been launched to determine the cause of the fire. Akinola disclosed that early findings suggest the incident may have been triggered by an electrical fault.

    “An investigation into the cause of the fire has commenced, with preliminary assessments pointing to a possible electrical fault,” he stated.

    He added that the Service has begun a comprehensive review of its internal safety procedures in response to the incident. According to the statement, all existing safety protocols are being examined and reinforced to prevent a recurrence.

    “In the meantime, all internal safety protocols are being thoroughly reviewed and strengthened to mitigate against future occurrences,” Akinola said.

    The FIRS assured the public that operations would continue while necessary remedial measures are taken to address the impact of the incident and improve safety across its facilities.

  • FIRS-France DGFIP MoU: Separating facts from fictions

    FIRS-France DGFIP MoU: Separating facts from fictions

    • By Daniel Adaji

    The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and France’s Direction Générale des Finances Publiques (DGFiP) recently, has triggered intense public debate, not because tax cooperation is unusual, but because taxation sits at the very heart of state power.

    The MoU signed on December 10 is coming nearly six weeks to the formal transition into the Nigeria Revenue Service which would take off in January 2026. The bone of contention here is whether the agreement represents a prudent effort to modernise Nigeria’s tax administration or a strategic misstep that could expose the country’s fiscal architecture to undue foreign influence.

    Understanding the controversy requires dissecting the content of the pact as clarified by the federal government in a document dated December 12, from the deeper structural fears driving public resistance.

    The federal government’s position

    The federal government maintains that the MoU is a standard technical cooperation framework focused strictly on capacity building and institutional learning. According to FIRS, the agreement does not grant France access to Nigerian taxpayer data, digital platforms, enforcement systems, or operational infrastructure. Existing Nigerian laws on data protection, cybersecurity, and national sovereignty remain fully applicable, and the MoU does not override them in any form.

    “The MoU is a standard globally recognized cooperation framework focused sole on technical assistance and capacity building. It does not grant France access to Nigeria taxpayer data, digital systems or any element of our operational infrastructure. All existing Nigerian laws on data protection, cybersecurity and sovereignty remain fully applicable and strictly enforced. The NRS like its predecessor, FIRS, places the highest premium on national security and maintains rigorous standard for the protection of all tax information,” the FIRS stated.

    Read Also: Federation Account inflows hit N56.4trn on reforms

    From the government’s perspective, the partnership is advisory and non-intrusive. DGFiP is positioned as a source of technical knowledge, drawing on its long institutional experience in digital tax administration, compliance management, governance, and public finance.

    The arrangement, FIRS argues, mirrors similar cooperation agreements signed globally by tax authorities seeking to adopt international best practices, particularly in an era of increasingly complex cross-border financial flows.

    The government also stresses that the MoU does not displace Nigerian technology providers or outsource core functions. Local institutions and fintech firms remain central to Nigeria’s tax ecosystem, while the transition from FIRS to the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) is being managed under Nigerian control. In this framing, the agreement is not a surrender of capacity but an attempt to strengthen it.

    Why public concerns persist

    Despite the official clarification, public anxiety has remained intense. This is not merely the result of misunderstanding but reflects deeper concerns about sovereignty, power, and historical experience.

    Nigerians home and abroad have taken to the social media to criticize this new move. On Facebook, Kholawole Prince Adebayor stated “Your FIRS dey sign MoU with France, country other African nations are sending away. Another user, Olalo Ayo Ayo Ajayi noted “Nigeria is walking into a one chance that will shock many generations. Let’s be clear, France is not an innocent country.”

    Ibrahim Rufai Buhari stated “I warned about this situation nine months ago.”

    On X formerly (Twitter), a user posted “The truth is, this data can reveal key financial patterns and give France visibility into our economy. Once it leaves, we can’t get it back, putting our national economic sovereignty at risk.”

    It added “This MoU could compromise our control over our revenue system, expose sensitive economic data, and weaken Nigeria’s fiscal independence. We are big enough to manage our own tax system and employ our own experts. This deal should be paused or renegotiated to protect Nigerian taxpayers and safeguard the sovereignty of our economy.”

    Tax systems are strategic assets. Beyond revenue collection, they reveal the inner structure of an economy: who generates wealth, who avoids obligations, which sectors thrive, and how political and commercial networks intersect. Even limited advisory exposure, if poorly bounded, can create informational advantages over time. This reality explains why tax administration partnerships attract far more scrutiny than other forms of technical cooperation.

    France’s historical role in Africa further complicates perceptions. Its deep involvement in the fiscal, monetary, and administrative systems of Francophone West Africa has left a legacy of distrust. While Nigeria is not part of the CFA zone, the fear is not about formal arrangements alone but about patterns of influence that often begin as technical assistance and evolve into structural dependence.

    Capacity building, not control

    Much of the controversy hinges on the phrase “capacity building,” which critics interpret as coded language for foreign penetration of sensitive state functions. FIRS, however, defines capacity building narrowly and technically: training staff, sharing administrative best practices, improving taxpayer services, and learning from international experience in digital tax administration.

    Crucially, the MoU does not include the provision of software, system design, data hosting, or operational management. It is not a services contract, and it does not displace Nigerian technology providers. FIRS maintains ongoing partnerships with local institutions and fintech firms, a point it raises to counter fears of foreign dominance over Nigeria’s revenue architecture.

    The red line: Data sovereignty

    On the most sensitive issue – data, the federal government draws a firm line. It states unequivocally that the MoU does not permit access to Nigerian taxpayer data or financial intelligence. Without data access, the government argues, claims of economic surveillance or fiscal domination collapse under scrutiny.

    From federal government’s perspective, sovereignty is not compromised by learning from another tax authority; it is compromised when institutions remain weak, opaque, and vulnerable to elite capture. In this framing, modernisation is a defensive strategy, not a surrender.

    Why France?

    The choice of France’s DGFiP is presented as pragmatic rather than political. DGFiP is among the world’s most established tax administrations, with extensive experience in digital systems, governance reform, and public finance management. Similar cooperation agreements, FIRS notes, exist globally among tax authorities seeking to adapt to increasingly complex, digital, and cross-border economies.

    The government rejects the notion that engagement equals subordination, arguing that Nigeria already operates within global tax cooperation frameworks without forfeiting its independence.

    Sovereignty, reframed

    Where critics see a slow erosion of independence through technical agreements, the federal government advances a counter-argument: that a weak tax system poses a greater threat to sovereignty than international cooperation ever could. Capital flight, tax evasion, and informal economic dominance, it argues, are the real forces hollowing out the Nigerian state.

    The MoU, in this context, is framed as preparatory groundwork for the transition from FIRS to the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), aimed at strengthening institutional competence before that shift occurs.

    The real test

    Ultimately, the debate is less about the text of the MoU than about trust, trust in institutions, in governance, and in the ability of the Nigerian state to draw firm boundaries in its dealings with foreign partners. Based strictly on the documents, the federal government’s position is clear: no data access, no system control, no foreign fingerprints on Nigeria’s tax backend. Whether that assurance holds will depend not on rhetoric, but on implementation, transparency, and sustained public scrutiny.

    For now, the MoU stands not as evidence of surrendered sovereignty, but as a reminder that in Nigeria, credibility is earned not by declarations, but by conduct.

    •Adaji, a tax expert, writes from Abuja.

  • FIRS debunks Atiku’s claims, warns against politicising tax administration

    FIRS debunks Atiku’s claims, warns against politicising tax administration

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has dismissed former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s recent comments on the appointment of Xpress Payments as one of the channels used in the national revenue collection system, describing his assertions as incorrect, misleading, and needlessly political.

    In a statement signed on Sunday by Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi, Technical Assistant on Broadcast Media to the Executive Chairman of FIRS, the agency clarified that it does not operate any exclusive or single-gateway arrangement, and no private company has been granted a monopoly over government revenue collection.

    According to the service, the FIRS currently runs a multi-channel, multi-payment Solution Service Provider (PSSP) framework featuring long-established platforms such as Quickteller, Remita, Etranzact, Flutterwave, and XpressPay.

    This diversified system, it said, is designed to make tax payment easier, more transparent, and more efficient for Nigerians.

    The statement stressed that PSSPs are not collection agents and do not earn processing fees or percentages from government revenues.

    Read Also: FIRS to drive tech reforms at MARCON retreat

    All payments, it noted, go directly into the Federation Account without diversion or intermediaries, and no PSSP has access to government funds.

    Highlighting the key elements of the current collection structure, FIRS explained that the scheme has been expanded to eliminate dominance by any single provider, improve efficiency through streamlined reporting, and support job creation and innovation within the financial technology sector.

    It also emphasized that all PSSPs are onboarded through a transparent and verifiable process.

    The agency described the ongoing national tax reform, led by the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, as central to Nigeria’s economic modernization—firmly rooted in transparency, efficiency, and broad stakeholder engagement—and cautioned against dragging it into political debates.

    The FIRS urged Atiku and other political figures to avoid mischaracterizing routine administrative processes for political gain, warning that Nigeria’s tax administration system is too critical to be undermined by misinformation.

    It reaffirmed its commitment to professionalism, transparency, and the continued strengthening of national revenue systems for the benefit of all Nigerians.

  • FIRS to drive tech reforms at MARCON retreat

    FIRS to drive tech reforms at MARCON retreat

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is set to take centre stage at this year’s All Maritime Journalists Retreat, where it will lead strategic discussions on accelerating the digital transformation of Nigeria’s trade ecosystem.

    Scheduled for December 4, 2025 in Lagos, the retreat will bring together key players across maritime, trade, finance, and technology to examine how emerging technologies can boost Nigeria’s import-export efficiency.

    The Maritime Correspondents’ Organisation of Nigeria (MARCON) said the FIRS will deliver a technical paper titled “Onboarding on the National Single Window Platform: A Step-by-Step Guide”, offering stakeholders a practical breakdown of how to integrate into the National Single Window (NSW)—a government-driven platform expected to streamline documentation, enhance transparency, and modernise trade processes.

    In a statement jointly signed by Conference Planning Committee Chairman, Paul Ogbuokiri, and Secretary, Adaku Onyenucheya, MARCON said the FIRS’ participation reflects its central role in technology-enabled trade facilitation, especially with the NSW Secretariat domiciled in the agency.

    According to the organisers, the retreat comes at a critical time as Nigeria prepares for the NSW to go fully live in the first quarter of 2026.

    Read Also: Tinubu: I’m determined to eliminate bandits, terrorists in North

    “The platform is a transformative tool for documentation and compliance, and stakeholders need clear guidance on onboarding requirements,” the statement noted.

    MARCON explained that the retreat will serve as a direct interface for industry players to receive clarifications on compliance expectations, digital integration, and the operational workflow of the new trade system.

    “This year’s theme, ‘Maximising Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Import and Export Trade’, reflects our commitment to helping the media understand the fast-evolving digital frameworks shaping the maritime sector,” the committee said.

    Beyond the technical sessions, the retreat aims to deepen maritime journalists’ understanding of the digital tools transforming Nigeria’s trade environment. Participants will gain access to expert-led analyses, practical demonstrations, and use cases that will support more informed and development-oriented reportage.

    MARCON said the gathering will also promote closer collaboration between the media and regulatory agencies. “Strengthening this relationship is critical to driving accurate, accountable, and forward-looking reporting that supports national trade reforms,” the organisers added.

    With the NSW expected to significantly cut transaction delays, reduce human interface, and boost government revenue, stakeholders believe this year’s retreat could not be timelier.

    The conference is also expected to set the tone for broader national conversations around building a competitive, technology-driven maritime sector capable of supporting Nigeria’s economic diversification efforts.

  • Two years of Adedeji at FIRS: A raft of achievements

    Two years of Adedeji at FIRS: A raft of achievements

    • By Abdullahi Ismaila Ahmad

    The emergence of Zacch Adedeji, PhD, as the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), began as a whisper before the formal announcement.

    Although the confirmation of his appointment came three months later, since he assumed office, he has practically demonstrated his capacity to take on the tax and fiscal space headlong with much equanimity expected of the Capricorn that he is.

    A Capricorn is disciplined, practical, ambitious, and hardworking. He often takes on leadership roles with a strong sense of responsibility and a “can-do” attitude. This is quintessential Zacch Adedeji, PhD.

    Two years on, these qualities have defined the leadership paradigm at the FIRS, shaping its policies and thrusting its administration in a positive direction.

    As Adedeji marks his second anniversary as the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) Executive Chairman, Nigerians can attest to his significant strides in transforming the nation’s tax system.

    He has led the FIRS to surpass revenue targets, introduced a raft of tax reforms, modernised tax administration, and made the FIRS a customer-centric organisation.

    Revenue collection achievements

    Under Adedeji’s leadership, the FIRS has consistently exceeded its revenue targets. In 2023, the agency collected N12.36 trillion or 107% thereby surpassing its target of N11.55 trillion. In 2024, he also collected 21.7 trillion naira against the target of N19.7 trillion.

    These remarkable feats demonstrate Adedeji’s ability to drive success through strategic planning and efficiency.

    Between September 2023 and August 2025, the Service collected a total of N46 trillion in tax revenue. This represents: 115% of the combined revenue target of N40.07 trillion.

    Read Also: I never said Buhari was linked to Boko Haram, Jonathan clarifies

    The two-year performance reflects the impact of reforms implemented by the management, which enhanced efficiency in the tax system, expanded the tax base, and improved compliance through digital solutions such as TaxPro-Max, e-Invoicing, and USSD (×829#) services. Strengthened enforcement measures, inter-agency collaboration, and improved staff welfare further boosted productivity.

    These measures reduced reliance on oil revenues, strengthened non-oil collections, and enabled the Service to exceed its revenue targets between September 2023 and August 2025.

    Tax system reforms

    Adedeji has introduced several initiatives to simplify the tax system and improve the taxpayer experience. These include: Introducing new tax legislation that aims to reform the obsolete provisions of the tax laws and align the tax system with modern taxation and economic practices.

    These tax legislations are the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 (NTA), the Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025 (NTAA), the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act 2025 (JRBA), and the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act 2025 (NRSA).

    TaxPro-Max: A tax administration system that automates over 80% of manual processes, reducing bureaucracy and enhancing efficiency.

    National Single Window Initiative: A platform that facilitates fast and easy trade operations at ports, harmonising government revenue and promoting economic growth.

    – One-Stop Shop: A streamlined tax office operation that caters to diverse taxpayers by category, improving customer satisfaction and reducing complaints.

    – Unbundling of administrative groupings in the Service: The groupings were hitherto based on tax types, but Adedeji’s model is based on functions designed to increase the taxpayer experience.

    Digital innovation

    The FIRS has made significant strides in digital innovation under Adedeji’s leadership. He has effectively introduced new integrated modules on:

    – TaxProMax: Automating tax processes and enhancing efficiency in tax payment.

    – Leveraged technology: To block revenue leakages, ramp up revenue collection, and enhance taxpayer experience.

    – Expanded integrated tax administration systems: Creating seamless, efficient, and transparent processes that redefine the taxpayer experience. He established self-service centres in the field offices to help taxpayers navigate the seamless tax payment processes.

    Customer-centric focus of the Service:

    In FIRS, there are three recognised categories of customers: taxpayers, vendors, and staff. Understood in this sense, Adedeji emplaced processes that ensure effective customer mapping and customer satisfaction journey.

    He underscored his customer-centric approach to tax administration by saying, “We are committed to fair tax administration through responsive and accessible service to optimise revenue for national development.”

    Notwithstanding these achievements, Adedeji remains focused on improving Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio, which is far below the African average. To address this, the FIRS has set an ambitious target to raise the ratio to 18% within the next few years.

    As Adedeji embarks on his second year at the FIRS, Nigerians should expect more successes as he leverages his expertise to advance Nigeria’s economic growth and fiscal sustainability. With a clear vision and strategic roadmap, the FIRS is poised to continue playing a pivotal role in shaping the country’s future.

    •Abdullahi Ismaila Ahmad, PhD Director, Communications and Liaison Department, FIRS

  • Nigeria’s tax laws: From archaic foundations to modern framework

    Nigeria’s tax laws: From archaic foundations to modern framework

    Nigeria’s tax system has always been a reflection of the country’s economic structure, its federal arrangement, and the state’s constant search for sustainable revenue.

    For decades, the framework was built around a combination of direct and indirect taxes, anchored by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), with state and local governments also exercising powers over personal income and certain levies. That old order provided the bedrock upon which the new reforms signed into law by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in June 2025 are now being built.

    Under the old laws, the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) stood at the heart of Nigeria’s tax system. It governed the taxation of companies’ profits, covering both domestic and foreign firms operating through permanent establishments. Deductions, capital allowances, and rules for the treatment of dividends were all set out, while incentives for pioneer industries, agricultural ventures, and exporters were embedded as part of efforts to stimulate economic diversification.

    Closely tied to this was the Petroleum Profits Tax Act (PPTA), which dealt with upstream oil operators. Given the strategic importance of crude oil revenues, this law carved out a separate regime with ring-fencing, anti-avoidance rules, and allowances to encourage investment in exploration, including deep offshore fields.

    For individuals, the Personal Income Tax Act (PITA) created a progressive system. Residents were taxed on worldwide income, non-residents on Nigerian-sourced earnings, while deductions for reliefs, dependents, pensions, and life assurance were permitted. Administration was mostly decentralized, handled by state boards of internal revenue, except for specific categories such as members of the armed forces and foreign service who remained under FIRS.

    Nigeria’s main consumption tax emerged under the Value Added Tax (VAT) Act, which replaced sales tax. VAT was charged at a flat rate and businesses were required to remit collections monthly, with limited opportunities for input tax credits. Certain essential goods and services, like medical products, educational materials, and basic food items, were exempt to cushion consumers.

    Alongside this sat the Capital Gains Tax Act (CGTA), taxing gains from disposals of chargeable assets at 10 percent, though with exemptions for securities and specific reorganizations. Stamp duties applied to legal instruments, while the Customs and Excise Management Act (CEMA) regulated duties on imports and excisable products such as alcohol, tobacco, and petroleum.

    The Education Tax Act, imposing a two percent levy on company profits to fund tertiary education through TETFund, highlighted the use of taxes to pursue social objectives. In general, the administration of all these laws rested with the FIRS under the FIRS Establishment Act, which defined powers of assessment, collection, enforcement, penalties, taxpayer obligations, and dispute resolution through objections, the Federal High Court, and the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT). Double taxation treaties also played a role, ensuring Nigerian companies and foreign investors were not taxed twice on the same income streams, while investment incentives such as pioneer status, rural allowances, and export expansion grants were woven into the system.

    That old structure has now been comprehensively reworked by four new laws: the Nigeria Tax Act (NTA), Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), Nigeria Revenue Service Act (NRSA), and the Joint Revenue Board Act (JRBA). Collectively, they mark one of the most sweeping reforms in Nigeria’s fiscal history.

    One of the most innovative changes in the new tax regime, is the relief for small companies. The exemption threshold for Companies Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, and the newly introduced Development Levy has been raised from N25 million to N100 million in annual turnover, alongside a fixed asset ceiling of N250 million. This means thousands of small businesses will no longer carry a federal tax burden, a measure expected to improve the ease of doing business and encourage formalization.

    On the other end of the spectrum, the reforms tighten rules for bigger players. The Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rate for companies has been increased sharply from 10 percent to 30 percent, aligning it with the Companies Income Tax rate and removing the arbitrage that once existed between trading income and capital gains. For individuals, gains are now taxed at their applicable progressive rates, making the system more equitable.

    Read Also: PDP crisis lingers as Anyanwu voids dissolution of Akwa Ibom Exco

    The scope of capital gains has also widened, with the introduction of CGT on indirect transfers of Nigerian company shares. This means that offshore holding company transactions that ultimately transfer control of Nigerian entities will trigger tax obligations in Nigeria, subject to treaty protections. In addition, the exemption threshold for share disposals has been raised to N150 million in any twelve-month period, with a cap ensuring gains do not exceed N10 million.

    A new feature of the tax landscape is the Development Levy, set at four per cent of assessable profits for all, but small companies. This levy consolidates multiple existing charges — the Tertiary Education Tax, IT levy, NASENI levy, and the Police Trust Fund levy — into a single unified payment, reducing multiplicity and simplifying compliance.

    For multinational corporations, the laws introduce a minimum effective tax rate (ETR) of 15 per cent of net income for groups with global turnover of €750 million or more, or Nigerian companies with turnover above N50 billion. This measure ensures large firms cannot exploit loopholes to pay little or no tax. Nigerian parent companies of multinationals will also be required to pay a top-up tax where subsidiaries abroad fall short of the 15 per cent benchmark.

    The rules around non-residents have been tightened considerably. The “force of attraction” principle now applies, allowing Nigeria to tax, not just activities conducted through a permanent establishment, but also related transactions. Profits from Engineering, Procurement, and Construction contracts are now taxable even when structured through multiple contracts or offshore elements. Minimum tax rules for non-residents also guarantee that their tax liabilities cannot fall below withholding tax, or four per cent of Nigerian earnings.

    Free Zone companies retain their exemptions on exports and supplies to oil and gas firms, but a transition period has been set. By January 2028, any sales into the domestic economy will subject them to full taxation, eliminating what was once a permanent tax holiday.

    Incentives have been recast. The long-standing pioneer status incentive has been abolished and replaced with the Economic Development Incentive (EDI), which grants a five per cent tax credit on qualifying capital expenditure for five years, extendable where unused credits remain. This shift signals a move toward measurable, investment-linked benefits rather than open-ended holidays.

    Personal Income Tax has been modernized. A clearer definition of residency, incorporating economic and family ties, expands the tax net, while exemptions for low-income earners have been raised to cover those earning N800,000 or less annually. Higher earners face steeper rates of up to 25 per cent. The threshold for tax-free severance or injury compensation has also risen from N10 million to N50 million.

    Administrative reforms are equally striking. A Tax Ombuds Office has been created to provide an independent forum for taxpayers’ complaints, while the NTAA now mandates disclosure of tax planning arrangements that confer tax advantages, marking a decisive step against aggressive avoidance schemes. Penalties for non-compliance have been significantly increased: late filing attracts N100,000 in the first month and N50,000 for each subsequent month, while contracts awarded to unregistered entities can draw fines of up to N5 million.

    Value Added Tax remains at 7.5 per cent, but its mechanics have changed. Nigeria has adopted global principles allowing recovery of input VAT on all purchases, including services and fixed assets, and expanded the zero-rated list to include food, medicines, education, electricity services, and tuition. The combination of zero rating and input recovery provides real relief for both consumers and businesses. VAT administration has also been digitalized, with fiscalisation rules and mandatory e-invoicing now in force.

    Perhaps most politically significant is the update to the VAT sharing formula. The federal government’s share has been cut from 15 per cent to 10 per cent, with states now receiving 55 per cent and local governments 35 per cent. Within these tiers, allocations will be based on equality, population, and consumption, creating a stronger link between economic activity and fiscal benefits at the subnational level.

    Finally, in recognition of the need for stronger coordination, the FIRS has been reconstituted as the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), with State Internal Revenue Services given full autonomy. A framework for joint audits has also been established, and the NRS may now assist states and local governments in revenue collection upon request.

    Taken together, the reforms reflect both continuity and change. From the old laws, Nigeria retains the broad architecture of corporate, personal, and indirect taxation, along with incentives for investment and social levies. But the new laws move the country decisively toward a modern, globally aligned tax eco-system: simplifying compliance, broadening the tax base, reducing distortions, strengthening enforcement, and ensuring a fairer balance of revenue across tiers of government.

    For Nigeria’s economy, the implications are far-reaching. Small businesses are set to benefit from reduced burdens, while larger corporations and multinationals will face stricter obligations under global minimum tax and anti-avoidance rules. Consumers will gain relief through expanded VAT zero-rating, while subnational governments stand to enjoy higher revenues under the revised sharing formula. At the same time, the consolidation of levies and the introduction of digital VAT administration promise to ease compliance and close leakages.

    The trajectory is clear: Nigeria is shifting toward a tax system that mirrors international best practices, while remaining sensitive to domestic needs. If effectively implemented, these reforms could broaden the revenue base, strengthen subnational fiscal capacity, attract investment, and ultimately stabilize public finances. However, their success will depend on administrative capacity, transparency, and the willingness of both businesses and citizens to embrace compliance in exchange for visible public benefits.

    In this sense, Nigeria’s new tax regime is more than a fiscal adjustment. It is a bid to reposition the economy on a path where taxation is not just a tool for revenue extraction, but a foundation for sustainable growth, equity, and accountability in governance.

  • e-invoicing: Fintechs advised to report payment transactions to FIRS

    e-invoicing: Fintechs advised to report payment transactions to FIRS

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has asked Fintechs to report all transactions channeled  through their networks to the service. The move followed ongoing implementation of e-invoicing scheme for major businesses in the country.

    Fintechs, also known as payment gateways are online platforms licensed by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) that enable businesses to securely process electronic payments from customers.

    They include Fintechs like Flutterwave, Paystack, Remita, and Interswitch, among others.

    The Acting Director of Tax Automation at FIRS, Mike Adoga, who disclosed this during a 2-day workshop on the e-invoicing solution in Lagos, said the submission from payment gateways is imperative to ensure that all business transactions pass through the FIRS Merchant Buying Solution (MBS).

    “If you’re tempted as a taxpayer not to declare your invoices on the invoicing platform, that would not be a very good idea, because we have given all the payment gateways the responsibility of reporting every payment that passes through them to us,” Adoga told the stakeholders.

    The e-invoicing system is designed for various transaction types, including Business-to-Business (B2B), Business-to-Consumer (B2C), and Business-to-Government (B2G).

    While over 1,000 companies are said to have onboarded on the platform as of August 1, which was the initial deadline set by the FIRS, the Service has extended the deadline by three months to November 1, 2025.

    According to the FIRS, onboarding on the e-invoicing platform is mandatory for companies with an annual turnover of N5 billion and above, and there are currently about 5,000 of them.

    Explaining the rationale for the new automated tax system, Adoga cited reports indicating that Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio is hovering around 10 per cent.

    Read Also: ManCo to take over Presidential Fertilizer Initiative from NSIA in November

    “What this means is that only 10 per cent of taxable transactions have been captured. That’s not good for us as a country. This is why we put the frameworks in place to enable us to do the right thing more easily,” he said.

    He noted that the e-invoicing project called Merchant Buyer Solution is a national project championed by FIRS in partnership with the Ministry of Finance, Nigeria Customs Service, CBN, and the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) as technology governance partner.

    According to him, the objective of e-invoicing is to be able to track all transactional data and reduce cases of arguments during tax filings.

    “If we’re part of the transaction from the beginning, when it’s time to establish your profit, tax liabilities that come from your profit, there’ll be less argument, there’ll be less audit and compliance will be higher,” he said

    The FIRS e-invoicing, also known as the Merchant Buyer Solution (MBS), is a digital system implemented by the FIRS to facilitate the issuance and management of electronic invoices.

    This system replaces traditional paper-based or electronic invoices with structured digital invoices for all business transactions, aiming to enhance tax compliance, streamline processes, and improve transparency in tax administration.

    Adoga had earlier assured stakeholders of strict data confidentiality under the electronic invoicing initiative. He said the agency is guided by the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) and has put in place strong safeguards to ensure data shared for tax purposes remains secure.

    “I want you to be rest assured that we are guided by the NDPA and that all data passed for tax purposes remains confidential. Taxpayer A does business with Taxpayer B, and it’s a taxable transaction — FIRS wants to know about it and make sure the taxes due are remitted correctly and on time. If we know about the transaction from the beginning, then there will be no argument because every transaction is captured. This reduces audit and compliance issues,” Adoga said.

    He explained that the project is not solely an FIRS initiative but a national one involving multiple federal agencies. “Our tax-to-GDP ratio still stands at around 10 percent, which is not good enough. That means only 10 percent of taxable transactions are being taxed. To close that gap, we must deploy digital solutions like e-invoicing,” he stated.

    The e-invoicing platform, according to FIRS, is expected to enhance transparency, improve voluntary compliance, reduce revenue leakages, and bring more economic actors into the formal sector. With over 1,000 large taxpayers already integrated, officials say the coming months will be crucial for onboarding the remaining 80 percent of the target group ahead of the November 1 enforcement date.

  • FIRS to host national conference on illicit financial flows

    FIRS to host national conference on illicit financial flows

    In order to protect Nigeria’s financial system and strengthen domestic revenue mobilisation, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has concluded plans to host a two-day national conference focused on combating Illicit Financial Flows (IFFs).

    The conference, scheduled for July 22 and 23, will take place in Abuja. It will bring together policymakers, tax administrators, law enforcement agencies, anti-corruption institutions, financial experts, and international stakeholders to develop actionable solutions to a challenge that has long undermined revenue collection and national development.

    With the theme “Combating Illicit Financial Flows: Strengthening Nigeria’s Domestic Resource Mobilisation,” the conference aims to deepen discussions on practical measures to protect Nigeria’s financial integrity. 

    According to a statement issued by Dare Adekanmbi, Special Adviser on Media to FIRS Chairman Dr Zacch Adedeji, the event is also part of the federal government’s wider strategy to ensure domestic resources are fully harnessed to drive economic growth.

    Prominent voices expected at the conference include Irene Ovonji-Odida, a member of the United Nations High Level Panel on IFFs (FACTI Panel), who will deliver a keynote address. The Minister of State for Finance, Dr Doris Uzoka-Anite, will chair the sessions.

    Read Also: Presidency applauds DBI leadership for advancing digital skills, youth empowerment

    Dr Adedeji noted that the conference aligns with FIRS’s ongoing efforts to curb illicit flows. These include initiatives to improve compliance mechanisms, introduce greater transparency in beneficial ownership, and deploy technology to detect and prevent tax evasion, trade mispricing, and other channels used for illicit outflows.

    “Before now, we have set in motion machinery to tackle IFFs by approving capacity building programmes for staff members of the agency on how to identify and block IFFs, and to increase revenue collection from the multinational corporations,” he said.

    He further disclosed the recent establishment of the Proceeds of Crime Management and Illicit Financial Flows Coordinating Directorate (POCM-IFF) within FIRS, describing it as a pivotal step in tackling the menace. According to him, taxes remain central to Nigeria’s economic stability and sustainable development.

    Beyond the FIRS’s internal measures, the statement recalled that the federal government had previously set up an Inter-Agency Committee on Stopping IFFs from Nigeria. The committee brings together key institutions including the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit, Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Nigeria Customs Service, Central Bank of Nigeria, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    In her remarks, Ovonji-Odida expressed optimism that the conference would deepen understanding of IFFs and generate stronger commitments to coordinated action.

  • NASS sets N25trn revenue target for FIRS in 2025

    NASS sets N25trn revenue target for FIRS in 2025

    The National Assembly Joint Committee on Finance has set a revenue target of N25trillion for the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), for the 2025 fiscal year.

    It commended the Executive Chairman of FIRS, Dr. Zaccheus Adedeji and the agency  for taking in the sum of N21.6trillion which was above its target of N19.4trillion in 2024.

    The resolution of the Committee was announced during an interactive session with the FIRS boss, Adedeji and his management team in Abuja.

    First to laud the agency after a presentation by its chairman was the Deputy Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Finance, Hon Saidu Musa Abdullahi who described the performance as unprecedented.

    “The feat attained by FIRS on revenue collection or generation in 2024 was unprecedented and a very wonderful one, worthy of commendation.

    “That you surpassed the target set for the agency in the 2024 Appropriation Act, from N19.4trillion to N21.6trillion is very cheering and encouraging,” he said.

    Read Also: Nigeria, Saudi Arabia sign MoU on 2025 Hajj

    He however urged the FIRS chairman to understudy the template being used in South Africa which according to him, generates revenue from tax collections far above that of Nigeria despite having a smaller population of about 45 to 54million people when compared to 200million which is the estimated population of Nigeria.

    “We shall give you total support on your tax reforms but you need to bring in more number of taxable citizens into the net from the informal sector,” he said.

    Also commending FIRS for  surpassing its projected tax revenue in 2024, Senator Joel Onowakpo Thomas (PDP – Delta South) in his remarks, said tax all over the world is the way to go, saying this is the reason FIRS must deepen the process through targeted  reforms.

    He suggested that the committee should increase projected revenue for FIRS in 2025 to N30trillion.

    Senator Binos Yeroe (Adamawa South), also commended the FIRS boss for the initiatives and innovations deployed in surpassing its  revenue target for 2024.

    “Your performance in 2024, was highly commendable and wish you keep it up,” he said.

    Speaking in a similar vein, Hon  Etanabene  Benedict, said: “If we do well on tax collections or revenue generation, we will not borrow to fund our budget.  Going by the feat attained by FIRS in 2024, I urge this committee to project N60trillion tax collection or revenue generation for it in 2025.”

    However, the co-Chairmen of the committee in their separate remarks, told the Adedeji that the N25trillion projected for the agency in 2025 is what he should work with and possibly surpass as done in 2024.

    The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance, Senator Sani Musa, said: “FIRS should work with the N25trillion projected revenue set for it in 2025. It is achievable and even surpassable.”

  • Law to vest collection of all government revenue on one agency under way

    Law to vest collection of all government revenue on one agency under way

    … bill set for second reading

    An executive bill that will scrap the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and replace it with the Nigeria Revenue Service that will be responsible for the collection and administration of all government revenue is currently being considered by the House of Representatives. 

    The bill which is one of the four executive bills presented to the House recently by the President is titled “an act to repeal the Federal Inland Revenue Service (establishment) act, no 13, 2007 and enact the Nigeria Revenue Service, charged with powers of assessment, collection of, and accounting for revenue accruable to the government of the Federation, and related matter” gazetted by the House as HB 1757.

    The bill is aimed at providing  a legal, institutional and regulatory framework for the administration of taxes and revenue under the various laws in the country and to account for such taxes and revenue collected.

    The proposed law vest on the service the power to administer Nigeria Tax Act, 2024, Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2024 and Laws imposing collection of taxes, fees and levies collected by other Government entities including signature bonus, pipeline fees, penalty for gas flared, depot levies and licences, fees for Oil Exploration Licence (OEL), Oil Mining Licence (OML), Oil Production Licence (OPL), royalties, rents (productive and non-productive), fees for licences to operate drilling rigs, fees for oil pipeline licences, haulage fees and all such fees prevalent in the oil industry but not limited to the above listed.

    Read Also: Eniola Badmus celebrates Seyi Tinubu’s birthday

    The new law grant the service the power to assess persons including corporations, companies, partnerships, enterprises and individuals chargeable with tax and collect or recover tax assessed, enforce payment of taxes and remit tax collected, under the provisions of this Act or any other law, into designated accounts. 

    The new body to be created will also be responsible by or accounting  for all revenue accruing to the Government, while working in collaboration with the relevant Ministries and Agencies of Government to review the tax regimes and promote the use of taxation to develop, stimulate and grow economic activities. 

    In addition, it is expected to arry out examination and investigation exercises with a view to enforcing compliance with the provisions of this Act, and any other tax law; make a determination of the extent of financial loss and such other losses by Government arising from tax fraud or evasion, and revenue foregone arising from tax waivers and other related matters. 

    It will also have powers to  adopt measures to identify, trace, freeze, confiscate or seize proceeds derived from tax fraud or evasion; adopt measures which include compliance and regulatory actions, introduction and maintenance of investigative and control techniques on the detection and prevention of non-compliance with tax laws. 

    It will also establish and maintain a system for monitoring international dynamics of taxation in order to identify suspicious transactions, and the perpetrators or other persons involved, while providing and maintaining access to up-to-date and adequate data and information on all taxable persons, individuals, corporate bodies or all agencies of government involved in the collection of revenue for the purpose of efficient, effective and correct tax administration and to prevent tax evasion or fraud. 

    The Nigeria Revenue Service is also to maintain database, statistics, records and reports on persons, organisations, proceeds, properties, documents or other items or assets relating to tax administration including matters relating to tax waivers, fraud or evasion;

    In addition, it will  liaise with the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, any Government security and law enforcement agency, and such other financial supervisory institutions in the enforcement and eradication of tax related offences. 

    It will have the power to implement an agreement or arrangement between the Government of Nigeria and the Government of another country to avoid double taxation while also providing administrative assistance in tax matters contains in an obligation for the collection of revenue claim due to the Government of that country or any other administrative assistance on tax, the Service shall carry out such obligation as may be prescribed in that agreement or arrangement.

    The law states: “The Service may enter into agreement with the competent authority of a country with which the Government of Nigeria entered into an agreement or arrangement for the avoidance of double taxation or administrative assistance in tax matters to prescribe the manner of the performance of the administrative assistance obligation contained in that agreement or arrangement.”

    It mandates the Accountant-General of the Federation shall open a designated account into which revenue claims collected by the Service on behalf of the Government of any other country shall be paid pending the remittance of the amount so collected to that country.

    It also mandate the Service to take any interim measure, including any judicial measure, in line with the provisions of this Act or other relevant laws to preserve the collection of any revenue claim for which assistance has been requested under this section.

    It said: “Without prejudice to the provisions of any other Act concerning data privacy or data protection, institutional information or communication, all internal information, communications, documents or memoranda of the Service are confidential.”

    It imposes a fine of N5 million or a three year jail term or both on anybody who discloses or attempts to disclose institutional information, communication, document or memorandum of the Service while insisting that those acting in an official capacity or employed in the administration of the Act shall regard and deal with originals or copies of all documents, information, returns, notices or assessment, lists relating to the business, assets, liabilities, profits or items of profits of any person as secret and confidential.

    It also said: “A person acting in an official capacity or employed in the administration of this Act who, being in possession of or control of, originals or copies of any document, information, return, notice or assessment, list relating to business, assets, liabilities, profits or items of profits of any person, communicates or attempts to communicate such information or anything contained in the document, return, notice or assessment, list or copy to any person other than-(a) a person authorised by the Service to communicate it;(b) by an order of the court; or for the purpose of this Act or any other tax law in Nigeria, commits an offence under this Act is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding N5 million or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both fine and imprisonment.

    “A person appointed or employed under this Act shall not be required to produce any document, information, return, notice or assessment, or to divulge or communicate any information that comes into his possession in the performance of his duties except as may be necessary in order to institute a legal proceeding or in the course of a legal proceeding relating to tax in Nigeria.

    “The obligation as to secrecy imposed by this Act shall not prevent the disclosure of relevant information to an authorised officer of the government of a country with which Nigeria has entered into any treaty, agreement or arrangement on tax matters.

    “A notice, summons or other document required or authorised to be served on the Service under the provisions of this Act or any other law may be served by delivering it to the Executive Chairman, sending it by registered post or courier service addressed to the Executive Chairman at the principal office of the Service, delivered to a designated e-mail address of the Service, or other electronic means as may be provided by the Service.

    “The Accountant-General of the Federation shall, not later than 30 days of receiving a warrant endorsed by the Executive Chairman of the Service and approved by a Judicial Officer in accordance with the Third Schedule to this Act, deduct un-remitted revenue due from any Ministry, Department, Agency or Government from its budgetary allocation or such other money accruing to it, and shall remit the deductions to the Service.

    It added:”Any other law for the assessment, collection and accounting of revenue accruable to the government of the federation as may be made by the National Assembly from time to time or regulation incidental to those laws, conferring any power, duty and obligation on the Service, or where no administrative provisions have been made for such tax, duty or levy.”