Tag: Fela Anikulapo-Kuti

  • Femi Kuti loses out again at the Grammy

    Femi Kuti loses out again at the Grammy

    AFTER weeks of anxiety sustained by hope, history again robbed Femi Kuti, son of the late Afrobeat king, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, of the coveted trophy at the 56th edition of the Grammy Awards ceremony on Sunday night at the prestigious Staples Centre in Los Angeles, United States.

    The 52-year-old singer was nominated in the ‘Best World Music Album’ category for No Place for My Dream. He was nominated with Gipsy King’s Savor Flamenco, Ladysmith Black Mambazo’s Live: Singing for Peace around the World and Ravi Shankar’s The Living Room Sessions Part 2.

    Following the nomination, his fans waited to see him win. But regrettably, the Grammy went to the popular French group, Gipsy King and a South African choral group, Ladysmith Black Mambazo, who tied.

    Femi, as he is fondly called, also lost out in 2003, 2010 and 2011. In 2003, he picked up his first Grammy nomination, but lost to Panamanian salsa singer, Rubén Blades. In 2010, the Beng Beng crooner was nominated in the same category, but lost to the US banjo player, Bella Fleck.

    Interestingly, after the announcement last night, he took to his Twitter handle, and shared his thoughts. He wrote: “Congrats to the winners! The nomination made my year. So, not winning won’t spoil it.”

    However, a number of nominees, in different categories, had a date with history. In the Record of the Year category, Daft Punk’s album, Get Lucky, which featured Pharrell Williams and Nile Rodgers, was adjudged the winner. Also, Daft Punk shone brilliantly as the winner in the Album of the Year category. This year’s Grammys also threw up Lorde as the winner in the Song of the Year category with his album, Royals.

  • Janiela partners Young D on ‘SEXY NANA’

    Janiela partners Young D on ‘SEXY NANA’

    NIGERIAN-AMERICAN singer, Janelia McNaire Sanya, is out to break new grounds, as she is now working with one of Nigeria’s finest producers, Young D, on her new effort, Sexy Nana.

    The curvaceous diva in the sizzling single sings about being the Sexy Nana to the man that is ‘turning her on’.

    The Internet is already buzzing with the streaming of this release, which promises a romantic video to be shot in the United States.

    “Plans are already on the way to shoot the music video in the US. Janelia is considering either shooting it in Hollywood, California or Washington, DC, which is known for having a lot of urban and exotic clubs that play Naija hip hop and Afro-beats. Either way, Janelia promises that the music video for Sexy Nana will be super hot and sexy,” her promoters have said.

    Janelia, who acknowledged the great influence of Sade Adu, the late Mariam Makeba and Fela Anikulapo-Kuti on her music, moves fluidly between genres. She anchored Sexy Nana on the contemporary sound of Afro beats which, according to her, is referred to as Afro-pop.

    Current YouTube comments on her ‘Love Song’ in Yoruba shows that she has a crossover appeal.

    The inclusion of Young D in Sexy Nana, many believe, will add verve to her works.

    Young D sure knows how to get the dance floor rocking and with the energy too.

    The producer is noted for Chidinma’s Oh Baby, Weird MC’s Ijoya remix and Fiesta.

    Also known as Timaya’s super hitmaker, Young D’s production is capturing the music industry gradually, slowly, having been listed among the 10 hottest producers of 2013.

    With the feat achieved by Sexy Nana so far, Janelia’s collaboration with Young D may continue, as she is currently recording a new album and shooting music videos for her new and upcoming releases.

    “In this new album, which is slated to be released in mid 2014, she is expanding her sound, as she further explores Afro-pop while infusing it with her original soulful vibes. Janelia’s new album will be a beautiful fusion,” the promoters further revealed.

    Some of Janelia’s recent performances include the Face List Awards in New York.

    During this performance, she paid tribute to honoree, Angelique Kidjo, with a soulful acoustic version of Agolo.

    She was also a headliner at Recher Theatre in Towson, MD. Janelia has also been the feature opening act for many national acts of various genres. Her past performances include: Havanna Festival, Artscape, the Detroit World Music Festival and many more.

    Janelia also performed at the Africa Malaria Day Benefit concert in Washington, DC, where she helped raise funds and awareness for Malaria treatment and prevention in Africa.

  • Ex-convict in our hearts

    Ex-convict in our hearts

    In a time like this, Nigerians will always remember the late Fela Anikulapo-Kuti. If Fela were alive, he would have dedicated a special album to the uncommon presidential pardon granted Chief Diepreye Alamieyeseigha, the former Governor of Bayelsa State, on March 12. Chief Alamieyeseigha, for the record, is an ex-convict. I guess the lyric of Fela’s release would be something like this:

    Fela: Alams, you jumped bail;

    Alams: Yes, I jumped bail;

    Fela: Alams, you be thief;

    Alams: Yes I be thief, but the government say I no be thief;

    Fela: Alams, you corrupt;

    Alams: Yes, but the government say I no corrupt;

    Fela: You disguised as a woman in the UK to jump bail;

    Alams: em.. em.. that one get as e be, but em … em… e no be true, etc.

    Never mind the fact that Fela is now dead, the truth is that he left behind powerful messages, some of which have proved him to be one of the greatest prophets Nigeria never anointed. Fela was a prophet. He died August 2, 1997, that was 15 years before. But we should not forget his ‘Government magic’. President Jonathan’s pardon for Chief Alamieyeseigha is one such magic. Since we cannot analyse the pardon because it defies logic, the kind that only the President and his colleagues in the National Council of State (NCS) understand, then it must eminently qualify as magic; precisely, government magic.

    Of course, Chief Alamieyeseigha was not the only ex-convict pardoned by the President; he only happened to be the most celebrated. And we should understand why. Chief Alamieyeseigha is not only from the President’s home state of Bayelsa, he is also President Jonathan’s ‘political benefactor’. So, we cannot put him in the same category as Mr. Shettima Bulama, an ordinary former Managing Director of Bank of the North. Other ex-convicts pardoned included Gen Oladipo Diya, the Chief of General Staff during the reign of military dictator Gen Sani Abacha, former Managing Director of the Bank of the North, Mr. Shettima Bulama, who was also convicted of fraud; former Chief of Staff, Supreme Headquarters, the late Gen Musa Yar’Adua; former Minister of Works, the late Maj.-Gen Abdulkareem Adisa, who was also found culpable in the alleged coup that landed Diya in prison. Others included ex-Major Bello Magaji, Mohammed Lima Biu and former Major Segun Fadipe.

    As we know, even ex-convicts have category. An ex-convict Bulama would put his mouth in what a friend calls ‘permanent position of shut up’ when his senior ex-convict in the person of Chief Alamieyeseigha is talking.

    But my understanding of presidential pardon is that it is usually for prisoners of conscience or political prisoners. But to grant such to common thieves similar to the one on the left side of Jesus on the Cross is, to say the least, disgusting. This was the same Alamieyeseigha who jumped bail in the UK where he was held for alleged money laundering. He ran back home and expected to triumphantly return to his seat as governor but for public outcry. Those saying he did plea bargaining and forfeited most of the ill-gotten wealth to the government missed the point. Alamieyeseigha did not do that on his own volition; he had no choice at the time he did. At any rate, it was not as if he was penitent; he even said he did not want to contest that decision then because age was no longer on his side. In other words, he never admitted he stole. So, why are they now ‘calling dog monkey ’ for us, as if we were not all living witnesses to this shameful episode? Indeed, this is the reason why I am pained. The President did not have to explain why he pardoned Alamieyeseigha; after all, he once told us that he did not ‘give a damn’ about his declaration of assets!

    It is unfortunate that Doyin Okupe, the President’s special assistant on public affairs, confused us the more, rather than convince us, when on Wednesday the government found its voice, through him, to defend the indefensible. He spoke about the President taking the decision alongside the NCS as if the people in the council are not Nigerians that we already know. Whenever we talk of the NCS and try to make an issue of it, I laugh. I laugh for the same reason that Okupe gave while defending the presidential pardon, that the council consists of some of the country’s ‘most distinguished personalities who could not have been mistaken in its action’. The question I have always asked myself is, why are we like this if really these people taking these essential decisions on our behalf are truly ‘some of the country’s most distinguished personalities’? If they are of impeccable wisdom as Okupe and others like him want us to believe, they all would not have slept facing the same direction on a matter as contentious as the one under consideration. The very fact that the matter has generated this heated debate nationwide is enough dent on the wisdom of their decision and it probably shows that we have always overrated them, or they have always overrated themselves.

    So, how is what the President did different from the judiciary which frees high profile criminals in the country only for them to get their comeuppance abroad? If government could set Alamieyeseigha free, why do we blame people who invade our jail houses with the intention of setting free those held there? Has President Jonathan ever considered the effect of this particular pardon on the country’s image abroad? Now, government officials would be blaming journalists and people who see nothing good in the country when the backlash comes, without being honest enough to accept that it (government) is responsible for the negative image because of these kinds of decisions. With a decision as this, how would President Jonathan feel in the company of world leaders when next he travels out? This is the same President who said he cannot grant amnesty to ghosts, but is now granting presidential pardon to common thieves. Does that tell us anything about the government, and by extension the ruling party? Remember, just about three weeks ago, one of their anointed who should know said their party harbours more Judases than genuine disciples. Isn’t this a vindication of that assertion? The same President Jonathan who is now compassionate when the matter affects one of his own has kept a judge of repute out of his office for months for no just cause, even after the National Judicial Council that rightly or wrongly took the matter to him has said the man is without blemish.

    I can live with the pardon granted those accused and convicted of coup plotting. After all, coup plotting can only be illegal in a democratic setting. The Abacha government that Diya and others were accused of plotting to overthrow was in itself an illegality. In case we have forgotten, a court pronounced its precursor, the Interim National Government, that much. At any rate, many of us were sad about the coup, phantom or real, that they said Diya and others planned, for the simple reason that it failed; thus denying Nigeria the noble service of terminating a government that was unwanted at home and distrusted abroad.

    All said, if this is what the PDP wants to continue doing and still hope to return to power in 2015, then the party has a lot to contend with. As I have always noted, a fowl that is excreting in a pot is merely spoiling its final resting place. President Jonathan might have had his way on the pardon for Alamieyeseigha, but we will continue to have our say. Chief Alamieyeseigha remains an ex- convict in our hearts. And that is what is most important.

  • Jona e don come again

    Jona e don come again

    Here lies our mutton-loving king,
    Whose word no man relies on,
    Who never said a foolish thing,
    And never did a wise one – John Wilmot (1647-1680), Earl of Rochester, on Charles II (1630-1685)

    Jona e don come again – what does that remind you of? Afrobeat legend, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti and his immortal number, Fela e don come again? Fela, that with his stinging lyrics and brash irreverence whipped wayward Nigerian leaders, military and civilian, into line?

    And who does the Wilmot quote above, on King Charles II of England, remind you of? Change “mutton-loving” to “cassava bread-gobbling”, and you would probably see Charles II leap into 21st century Aso Rock; and our own Goodluck Jonathan dive into 17th century Court of Saint James!

    There are differences in specifics, of course. While Charles II loved his mutton and Goodluck Jonathan loves his cassava bread, the jury is still out on whether or not, like Charles II, no one ever relies on Jonathan’s word, whether Jonathan never said a foolish thing or ever did a wise one – since his first term is still counting; and he is busy, very busy, ogling a second!

    What is without controversy, however, is that like Wilmot’s rather unflattering impression of Charles II (who should have been wiser, for his father Charles I – 1600-1649 – was executed by the Oliver Cromwell mob), Nigerians are nervy about the their president’s lack of verbal rigour, since they hold their breath anytime the president speaks extempore – and he never disappoints by the seeming sheer shallowness of his thinking; and the seeming eternal grudge in his psyche!

    It is true: Ibrahim Babaginda peppered us with subversive slipperiness, Sani Abacha sapped us with Stone Age starkness, Olusegun Obasanjo bombed us with empty superiority complex, and Umaru Musa Yar’adua (Allah rest his soul!) teased us with health-challenged taciturnity.

    Might Goodluck Jonathan be adding a lack of gravitas and executive inferiority complex to the mix? That brings to the fore the president’s latest gaffe, during his surprise visit to the Police College, in Ikeja, Lagos.

    Now, without reference to the merit or demerit of the president’s points, that outburst followed a disturbing pattern, which always sends many a concerned Nigerian reeling.

    As a dutiful president, highly paid and generously maintained by the citizens, his job was to go there, after the Channels TV expose, to find out the level of the rot and fix it.

    But alas! The president, from his comment, was sadder at the PR disaster the decaying Police College was giving his government than at the scandalous decay of Nigeria Police’s premier training college! How can a president justify his keep with such grudge reasoning?

    O yes: a committee has been set up to probe the rot and make recommendations and all that “Jonathanistic” predictable! But by that tragic Freudian slip, of a president fishing for motive when the reality of the situation was sobering enough, most would continue to doubt the appropriateness of Jonathan’s temper for leadership; and even his competence to analyse problems and solve them.

    So, Jonathan is more interested in smashing his self-conceived agent provocateurs who allowed “penetration” into the sorry college than he is in fixing the mess. Now, what sort of self-misguided president is that?

    But that was not the first time President Jonathan would evince such abhorrent traces. In January 2012, after the “fuel subsidy” removal ill-advised by his Breton-Woods radicals, bent on making Nigeria the eternal peon of their Western metropolitan masters, Goodluck Jonathan fumed without end on how his enemies sponsored the protests; and how these presidential traducers provided Lagos protesters with choice victuals and bottled water; that even his own presidential villagers of Otuoke could not afford!

    To start with, such un-presidential whining was absolutely uncalled for – both as private riposte and public presidential counter. In a democracy, the legitimate job of the opposition is to paint government black to ease its own way to power, just as the government, if it falls into opposition, is perfectly entitled to same tactics, to claw its way back from power wilderness.

    But the disturbing pattern then – as now in the Police College case – was that the president would blame people protesting a heinous policy rather than rebuke himself that pushed that policy. As it has turned out, the so-called “subsidy” was partisan election gravy which Jonathan wanted Nigerians to, willy-nilly, pay back. What if those protests had not partially checkmated that unconscionable plot!

    To compound the Jonathan presidential tragedy, he has surrounded himself with “elders” pushing his cause who nevertheless are no more than juveniles – and wilful, misguided ones at that!

    The other day, Elder Godsday Orubebe, minister of Niger Delta affairs, pounced on Rivers Governor Rotimi Amaechi, for no crime than a rumoured aspiration for presidential ticket 2015; and for not “respecting” the president – as if Jonathan were a god to be worshipped willy-nilly and not a republican chief public servant to be judged, rewarded or punished strictly by the worth of his work.

    Then on January 24, Edwin Kiagbodo-Clark, Ijaw nationalist, took up the president’s case, descending on the PDP Governors’ Forum for not bowing and trembling before his protégé; and former President Olusegun Obasanjo for subverting the PDP party order.

    To be sure, Clark’s attack on Obasanjo is not unjustified, for Obasanjo really ruptured the PDP hierarchy by amassing both presidential and party powers. But is Pa Clark piqued because Obasanjo grabbed power or because Jonathan has the governors to contend with, in his own sorry attempt to repeat Obasanjo’s power-grab rascality?

    Pa Clark, with all due respect to him, speaks like one without a sense of history. As a younger man, he served under the young Gen. Yakubu Gowon (1966-1975). Sure, Gowon back then, had his own share of gaffes, like the claim that Nigeria’s problem was not money but how to spend it.

    Still, Gowon boasted no doctorate when he ruled (though he earned one later); and was far more callow than Jonathan. But was Gowon a tell-tale of fumbling, and lack of rigour and wisdom like Jonathan, with his PhD, now? Yet, Clark would bad-mouth anyone saying Jonathan is unfit for second term, as his disastrous first-term record is clearly showing – just as he libelled anybody that opposed Jonathan’s presidential bid in 2011.

    Well, there is news for Pa Clark and his protégé. A time was, when some power brokers thought you just needed a stamp of the North, no matter how defective you were, and you were as good as president. That prompted the disastrous Bashir Tofa-Sylvester Ugoh 1993 presidential ticket.

    Now, Clark and co think if only Jonathan can muscle the PDP nomination (like Obasanjo before him), his presidential encore is assured. Let Pa Clark, and his ilk, dream on. Someone needs to be sacrificed, anyway, to clear the illusion that only the worst is good enough as president for Nigeria.

    Jonathan, with his utterly uninspiring present term and clearly illogical fixation with a fresh term, has done enough to earn that electoral disgrace.

     

  • Felasophy as tool for social change

    Felasophy as tool for social change

    As part of activities for this year’s Felabration, in honour of the late Afrobeat legend, Fela Anikulapo Kuti, the founder of Omooba Yemisi Adedoyin Shyllon Art Foundation (OYASAF), Prince Yemisi Shyllon, presented this paper on the life, times and philosophy of the legend at a discussion session in Lagos.

    “We are here to celebrate the life, times and philosophy of Olufela Olusegun Oludotun Ransome-Kuti my late kinsman from Ake in Abeokuta, who is globally known as Fela Anikulapo-Kuti but popularly called Fela. It is the philosophy in Pan Africanism as practiced and unique to Fela that is herein-after in this paper referred to, as Felasophy.

    My close study of the life of Fela and Felasophy reveals that Fela did not develop his philosophical leaning from western philosophies, which evolved and has been passed on to generations down the line from Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Cicero and others. Rather, a study of the life of Fela and Felasophy, as a philosophy, appears to have been planted during his travel and time spent in Ghana in 1967.

    It was during that time in Ghana, that Fela named his musical band “Afro Beat”. It is, therefore, open to debate, that Felasophy as a philosophy, in Africanism was born in Ghana. Therefore, Felasophy appears to have arisen out of the obvious influence of Nkrumah’s non-aligned Marxist perspective on economics and his Pan- Africanist philosophy, which he founded in his 1967 essay titled: “African Socialism Revisited”. In this essay, Nkrumah specially addressed the issues of non-aligned Marxist philosophy in terms of his perspective on African economics that is supposed to accommodate the changes that capitalism could bring upon the African society while still respecting African values.

    Nkrumah’s doctrine of African socialism, bought into by Fela, is based on traditional African society and is founded on the principle of egalitarianism. This principle of African egalitarianism is based on the postulation that each man is meant to be an end in himself, not merely a means and to accept the necessity of guaranteeing each man, equal opportunity for his development. It is on this basis that Felasophy, as a philosophy, kept on transmitting into its various transformations but never lost its central identity as a people-oriented egalitarian philosophy during the life time of Fela.

    One must emphasize, that this African socialism on which Felasophy rests, equally evolved out of Nkrumah’s study as a disciple of Gandhi. Gandhi had long since enunciated the necessity of fighting neo-colonialism in a non-violent basis. If we recollect, all through the life of Fela, notwithstanding the various injustices wrought on him, he never for one day fought back in violence. Every follower of the music of Fela here would recollect his music, “Africa must unite”. That song is the product of Nkrumah’s fetishisation of pre-colonial Africa which he preached in 1963 that “Africa Must Unite”. Nkrumah also called for the immediate formation of a pan African government. This call may have later led to the establishment of the Organization of African Unity (OAU).

    Another common ground between Nkrumah’s Pan-African philosophy and Fela’s Felasophy, is the fact that both philosophies were inspired by black intellectuals like Marcus Garvey, W.E.B. Du Bois and George Padmore. These African philosophers influenced Nkrumah and they eventually also influenced Fela in his pan-Africanist Felasophy. Of particular importance to the emergence of Felasophy, is Fela’s contact with the Black Power movement in 1969 when he took his band to the United States. After that trip, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti became more partisan by virtue of his contact with Sandra Smith, who was later referred to as Izsadore in the partisan Black Panther Party. Fela’s contact with Black Panther Party would also eventually heavily influence his music and his political views such that, he had to rename his band “Nigeria ’70” on his return from the US. During his trip, the Immigration and Naturalization service in the US were tipped off by a promoter that Fela and his band were in the United States without work permit. We can recollect that Fela performed a quick recording session in Los Angeles that would later be released in the 1969 Los Angeles sessions.

    One must again mention the effect of Garvey’s contact with Fela in the emergence of Felasophy by looking at the statement made by Garvey when he stated that, and I quote “Look for me in the whirlwind or the storm, look for me all around you, for, with God’s grace, I shall come and bring with me countless millions of black slaves who have died in America and the West Indies and the millions in Africa to aid you in the fight for Liberty, Freedom and Life “. You will all agree with me here, that the totality of Fela’s life revolved around this philosophy. Felasophy, therefore, represents Liberty for all, freedom for all and egalitarian life for all by all. This is what encapsulates Fela’s life which forms the major ingredients of Felasophy.

    On the return of Fela with his band to Nigeria in 1970 and the renaming of his band as “Africa 70”, his lyrical themes changed from love to social issues. He then formed the Kalakuta Republic, a commune, a recording studio and a home for many, connected to the band that he later declared independent from the Nigerian state. He set up a nightclub in the Empire Hotel, named the Afro-Spot and then the Afrika Shrine, where he performed regularly. Fela also changed his middle name to Anikulapo (meaning “he who carries death in his pouch), stating that his original middle name of Ransome was a slave name. All these representing the consolidation of Felasophy in the life and philosophy of living by Fela.

    Thereafter, the totality of the lifestyle of Fela became a reflection of the strong dedication to his pan Africanist philosophy of Felasophy. In fact, he therefore made the decision to sing in Pidgin English so that his music could better be enjoyed by individuals all over Africa, where the local languages spoken, were very diverse and numerous. All this while, Fela maintained a close contact with fellow pan-Africanists such as Thomas Sankara, whose personal charisma, had an array of original African philosophical initiatives that contributed to Sankara’s popularity in Africanist posture that brought some international media attention to Burkina Faso. Fela at every opportunity publicly acknowledged his love for Thomas Sankara’s philosophy and the various pan Africanist and populist Burkinabe revolution practiced by Thomas Sankara.

    Some of the things Thomas Sankara did that attracted him to Fela and which coincided with the philosophy of Felasophy are, for instance, Sankara’s conversion of an army’s provisioning store into a state-owned supermarket open to everyone which ended up being the first supermarket in Burkina Faso. Sankara also forced civil servants to pay one month’s salary to public projects. He refused to use the air conditioning in his office on the grounds that such luxury was not available to everyone but a handful of Burkinabes. He lowered his salary and limited his possessions to one car, four bikes, three guitars, a fridge and a broken freezer. He required public servants to wear a traditional tunic, woven from Burkinabe cotton and sewn by Burkinabe craftsmen.

    Let us come back home: I guess, that we all remember Fela carrying some fire wood on top of his highly prized Mercedes Benz car in the 70s and riding it around Lagos in defiance of the social hegemony of the rich in Nigeria..

    When Sankara was asked why he didn’t want his portrait hung in public places, as was the norm with other African leaders, Sankara replied “There are seven million Thomas Sankaras.” This is reminiscent and in tandem with Fela’s Felasophy.

    Sankara was an accomplished guitarist, who wrote his country’s new national anthem himself. Would anybody here please point out any difference in all these between Fela’s postures and philosophies of life to that of Thomas Sankara? It is for this type of populist and egalitarian philosophy of life strongly shared with Thomas Sankara that made Fela to publicly mourn Sankara in his song, solely dedicated to Thomas Sankara when Sankara was assassinated by his close friend.

    Felasophy was practiced by Fela through his music which became popular in Nigeria and elsewhere but which became very unpopular with ruling Nigerian governments that eventually led to the raiding of his Kalakuta Republic. In 1972, Ginger Baker recorded the song, titled, “stratavarious” with Fela appearing alongside Bobby Gass. Around this time, Fela had become more involved in Yoruba religion which is an important part of Felasophy. In 1977, Fela released “Zombie” a scathing attack on Nigerian soldiers. The album was a smash hit that infuriated the government of the day which culminated in setting off a vicious attack on Fela by a government led by his kinsman with some 1,000 soldiers, attacking Fela’s private commune. However, Fela remained undaunted, notwithstanding the beatings he received and the death of many. Fela’s unique courage is found thereafter, in his delivering the replica of his mother’s coffin to the seat of government in Lagos where his kinsman resided as the head of the military government. He was to thereafter write his song “Coffin for Head of State” and also the “Unknown Soldier”. The latter song was composed referencing the report of an official inquiry into the attack that claimed the Kalakuta commune and which inquiry failed to identify the culprit but termed the culprit “Unknown Soldier”.

    We must recollect that, Fela was an avid reader who imbibed the spirits of different pan African philosophies and movements as espoused by president Toure of Guinea and Jomo Kenyatta of Kenya. The latter led the Mau Mau movement in obtaining independence for his country, Kenya, after his imprisonment of some six years by the British government.

    A discussion of Felasophy is not complete without mentioning the Pan Africanist and egalitarian movement of Patrice Lumumba. A latter declassified document released in July 2006 by the United States government revealed that the CIA plotted the assassination of Lumumba on the basis that it believed that Lumumba was a communist by virtue of Lumumba’s populist Pan Africanist philosophy . This revelation all went to influence and fire Fela’s political posture and philosophy of Felasophy.

    One other Pan Africanist whose Philosophy must have influenced the emergence of Felasophy, is Leopold Senghor. Senghor was not only a poet but also a widely acknowledged pan-Africanist leader. He created the concept of Negritude an important intellectual movement that sought to assert and to valorise what was believed to be a distinctive African characteristic, value and aesthetics. Leopold Senghor’s Negritude was a reaction against the very strong dominance of French culture in its African colonies, and against the perception that Africa did not have culture developed enough, to stand alongside that of Europe, which is something that must have also influenced Fela’s music “African Must Unite “. Felasophy identifies with ancient Egypt as of the same cultural continuum, reaching from Egypt to classical Greece, through Rome to the European colonial powers of the modern age. Just as Felasophy was misinterpreted by various leaders of Nigerian governments, so was negritude perceived in some quarters as anti-white racism. Indeed as Negritude emphasized the importance of dialogue and exchange among different cultures either European, African or Arab so also did the Felasophy doctrine encourage such exchange to the extent that Felasophy, became even more popular in France than in Nigeria. This popularity was so, notwithstanding the wraths invoked on Fela as a result of the narrow mind of Nigeria’s leaders. One must mention that the Nigerian government at a time, wrongly jailed Fela on a trumped up charge of currency smuggling which Amnesty International and others, later denounced as politically motivated and thereafter designated Fela as a prisoner of conscience. Fela’s case was also taken up by other human rights groups in the world. He was not released from jail until 20 months later by General Ibrahim Babangida.

    Felasophy is based not only on the issues discussed earlier but also the philosophy that supports traditional religions and lifestyles. Felasophy emphasizes that the most important thing for Africans to fight, is European cultural imperialism. Felasophy is based on the candid support of human rights which can be found in many of Fela’s songs which directly attacked dictatorships with special emphasis on the attack of military governments in Nigeria. Felasophy was an instrument of social commentary which criticised fellow Africans for betraying traditional African culture. This is the major reason why in demonstrating the practicality of his pan Africanist philosophy, Fela married many wives and the Kalakuta republic was formed as a polygyny colony. He defended his stand on polygyny with the words “A man goes for many women in the first place. Like in Europe, when a man is married, when the wife is sleeping, the man goes out and f***s around. He should rather bring the women into the house, to live with him, and stop running around the streets”. Fela’s views towards women are characterised by some, as misogynist in reaction to Fela’s song, titled, “Woman na Mattress” which is usually sighted as evidence towards Fela’s misogynist tendency. This is an element which greatly demonstrates the complexity of Fela vis-à-vis his philosophy in egalitarianism.

    Another difficulty in understanding Felasophy, can be found in the resolution of his polygyny philosophy with the way he mocks African women who imbibe the European standards of “lady-hood” while extolling the values of the local market woman in his song “Lady”.

    In conclusion, I want to thank the children of Fela Anikulapo-Kuti, his friends, fans and family in continuing the tradition of celebrating Fela annually through Felabration. We must join hands with his family to sustain the beauty of Felasophy, but in doing so separate the baby from the bath water because herein lies the original African philosophy, untainted, unalloyed by an original African man – Fela Anikulapo-Kuti.”