Tag: FEMI FALANA

  • Yoked to society’s good

    Not a few love to call him Senior Advocate of the Masses (SAM) 2, after the incomparable Gani Fawehinmi, SAN, SAM (1938-2009), the original to get that accolade.

    Femi Falana, SAN, who just turned 60, is not Gani Fawehinmi. But like Gani, the Nigerian establishment, for much long, denied him a professional distinction, the Senior Advocate of Nigeria, that he eminently merited. That Mr. Falana has taken the silk today is both a tribute to the triumph of justice, equity and fair play, as it is a salute to the supreme and unbending belief in one’s cherished values.

    In Nigerian law history, two major schools would appear to have evolved. The first school teems with lawyers that champion law for law’s sake. Their patron saint would clearly appear Nigeria’s first SAN, the late Chief Rotimi  Williams (1920-2005) aka Timi the Law and Weight of Evidence, since his giant frame fairly conjured the formidable image of a legal Titan.

    The second school ripples with lawyers, no less brilliant at law, but who see the law as an urgent and potent tool to help chisel the general society into a better shape. Gani sits clearly atop this pantheon of legal saints, for whom the Nigerian civil society owes eternal gratitude, especially during that terrible era of military rule. In this distinguished galaxy would sit the late Alao Aka-Bashorun (1930-2005), former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) president (1987-1989), Olisa Agbakoba, SAN, on his exploit as first president of the Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO), and of course, then young Turk, now a major force, both at law and social crusading, Mr. Falana.

    Indeed, since joining Aka-Basorun’s People’s Chambers in 1983 as a fresh wig, after graduating from the Nigerian Law School and the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University, OAU), Mr. Falana chose a life of struggle — not for himself and family per se, but for society, then under military jackboot rule. So with Aka-Basorun before his exile, ill health and death, and for much longer with Gani, and the late Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, Falana was in every major campaign to fix his country.

    He was part of the braves that, in September 1990, essayed a Sovereign National Conference (SNC) in Lagos. He was just seven years at the Bar. Though Gen. Ibrahim Babangida’s junta crushed that attempt, it was the first serious notice, by the radical and progressive elements of Nigeria’s civil populace, that Nigerians were getting tired of Babangida’s transition to nowhere.

    When Babangida’s cup ran over, and he rashly annulled the June 12, 1993 presidential election which Bashorun MKO Abiola won, Falana was part of his nemesis: the carefully organised civil resistance to that criminal impunity. Though the mandate never got re-actualised, Falana and co. could claim the credit for not only claiming IBB’s scalp (forcing him to “step aside” from power) but ensuring neither Sani Abacha nor other venal military adventurists got lasting gains from that outrage. The eventual result was the hurried military withdrawal to the barracks to face their core duty and the rebirth of democracy in 1999.

    But even at that, Femi Falana has, since 1999, seized the instrumentality of the law and his extensive reach within civil society, to further push the frontiers of responsible governance and citizens’ freedom. He is in and out of court to sue to either do the undone or stop a wrong action embarked upon. Every time, he has been a forceful and progressive articulator of the law and most times, like Gani before him, coming down hard on the side of the citizen, against the Leviathan government.

    Even with the present democratic dispensation had come the high crime of rigging elections and trying to suborn the courts to keep the proceeds of fiddled votes. Again, Mr. Falana has been in the vanguard of those corps of lawyers that got many of these brazen electoral heists recovered.

    President Muhammadu Buhari’s election in 2015 and his high profile war against corruption have put the judiciary’s foot to the fire, especially on the vexed issue of judicial corruption and the miscarriage of justice.  Again, when other lawyers hee-haw, on the one hand condemning judicial corruption, but in another breath seeking some sickly solace in judicial esprit de corps, Falana is one of the few that have come out strongly on the side of justice, even against its blighted temple.

    In the current effort, Falana has been an immeasurable support to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). If the war achieves its goal, and the judiciary is rid of criminal and compromising elements and the Nigerian judiciary regains its old respect and citizens can again get justice without much ado, then that success would be due to the crucial and unambiguous support by the likes of Femi Falana, in those very days of the judiciary’s institutional conspiracy against its own wellness and long- term sanity.

    Many, of course, have charged Femi Falana, on account of his name popularity with the media, of the penchant to play to the gallery. That is no illegitimate charge. But suffice it to say: even with that, he would count among the very finest of his generation, in applying the law to fix the society.

    For this, both Alao Aka-Basorun and Gani Fawehinmi must be proud of a worthy protégée hoisting that noble banner. But for Falana at 60, it’s morning yet on crusading day!

  • Omo-Agege: Falana commends Senate for obeying court order

    Lawyer activist, Femi Falana (SAN) has urged the Senate to withdraw the appeal it filed against the judgment of a federal high court which declared the suspension of Senator Ovie Omo-Agege as illegal.

    He stated this in a statement issued in Lagos on Tuesday titled: “Senate’s commendable obedience of rule of law”.

    Falana said the Senate has demonstrated leadership by example by obeying the judgment of the court and allowing  Senator Omo-Agege to resume legislative duties.

    The statement read in part; “notwithstanding that the motion for stay of execution of the judgment of the Justice Nnamdi Dimgba delivered last week in the case of Senator Ovie Omo-Agege vs The Senate   has not been heard, and determined by the Federal High Court, the Senate  resolved Tuesday  to comply with the terms of the judgment.

    “I have confirmed that Senator Omo Agege has since resumed his legislative duties.

    “By complying with the judgment without any conditions whatsoever the Senate has demonstrated leadership by example.

    “This is highly commendable in a country where official impunity has since been institionalised.

    “Having regard to the settled position of the law as expoused by our courts in not less than five cases wherein the suspension of legislators by legislative houses was annulled and set aside, the Senate should withdraw the appeal filed against the judgment of the Federal High Court in the case of Senator Omo-Agege.

    “That was the matured approach adopted by the Dimeji Bankole-led House of Representatives in the case of Hon Dino Melaye & Ors v House of Representatives.

    However, the Executive branch of the Federal Government is called upon to emulate the good example of the Senate by complying with all valid and subsisting judgments of all courts in Nigeria.

    “In particular, the executive should, as a matter of urgency, purge itself of contempt of court by complying with the judgment of the Federal High Court delivered on December 2, 2016  which directed that Sheik Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Hajia Zeinab Elzakzaky be released from the illegal custody of the State Security Service.

    ” In the same vein, Colonel Sambo Dasuki ought to be released on bail in line with the orders of the Federal High Court, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory and the Community Court of Justice Economic Community of West African States”, he stated.

  • Falana urges ASUU to facilitate collection of N463 billion from TETFUND

    Human rights activist, Mr. Femi Falana SAN has urged the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) to ensure that the sum of N463 billion education intervention fund lying fallow at the Central Bank of Nigeria is immediately disbursed by the TETFUND to the universities, polytechnics and colleges of education owned by the federal and state governments.

    While addressing the 20th Delegates Conference of ASUU taking place at the Tafawa Balewa University in Bauchi State on Tuesday,  Mr. Falana commended the union for the initiative which led to the enactment of the TETFUND Act in 1992. The law  has made it compulsory for all companies operating in Nigeria to contribute education tax of  2 percent from their annual profits to the funding of publicly owned tertiary institutions in the country.

    However, the Senior Advocate stunned participants at the conference when he disclosed that the tertiary institutions did not access N250  billion from the account of TETFUND from 2011-2016 and that the sum of N213.4  billion is outstanding for 2017. Mr. Falana said that the 78 public universities are entitled to about 50 percent of the total sum of N463 billion in the TETFUND Account.

    While urging the TETFUND board to urgently review the cumbersome guidelines for accessing the fund Mr. Falana  called on the ASUU and other campus unions to monitor the collection of the education tax, the disbursement and management of the intervention fund by the authorities of tertiary institutions.

    He informed the ASUU leaders that due to the failure of the staff and student unions to monitor the fund over the years not less than N250 billion has been criminally diverted from the TETFUND by some unscrupulous school administrators with the connivance of the former board members of the TETFUND. Mr. Falana assured that the bulk of the stolen fund would be recovered by the anti graft agencies which are currently probing the fraud.

    Mr. Falana advised TETFUND to stop imposing a ban on institutions from accessing the fund because some past administrators  failed to render account of the monies collected by them. Instead of imposing collective punishment on the innocent staff and students of such institutions Mr. Falana suggested to TETFUND to submit the names of such administrators to the police and the anti graft agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.

    Since successive governments have paid lip service to the funding of education Mr. Falana said that without the intervention of TETFUND the public tertiary institutions would have collapsed. As the various governments have failed to make provision for capital projects in public schools TETFUND has become the only source of funding infrastructural development and research in all the public tertiary institutions.

    Mr Falana believes that if TETFUND can make available N213 in 2017 alone the body  has the capability to make a greater impact on the public tertiary institutions if the education tax is effectively collected and monitored. Mr. Falana made a strong case for the involvement of all stakeholders in the collection of the education tax.

    He particularly taxed ASUU to deploy its intellectual resources to collate information of all companies that are liable to pay the education tax as less than 50 percent of all companies operating in the country are currently  paying the tax. The human rights activist also advised ASUU to collaborate with the Federal Inland Revenue Service for effective collection of the education tax.  “Having fought for the enactment ASUU has a legitimate right and moral duty to ensure that the law is well implemented” Mr. Falana concluded.

  • IGP’s decision to prosecute IBB’s press secretary illegal, says Falana

    IGP’s decision to prosecute IBB’s press secretary illegal, says Falana

    Activist lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) has described as illegal the decision of the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Mr Ibrahim Idris to prosecute Mr. Kassim Afegbua, the Press Secretary of former President Ibrahim Babangida, for defamation.

    In a statement issued in Lagos yesterday, Falana who noted that neither President Muhammadu Buhari nor Babangida has filed any complaint against Afegbua, contended that there was no justification for the action of the IGP.

    Afegbua, according to him, has not committed any offence known to the law.

    “Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the issuance of the public statement by Mr. Afegbua and the denial by General Babangida, it ought to be pointed out that no criminal offence known to law has been committed to warrant the action of the Inspector General of Police. More so, that both General Babangida and President Buhari have not complained that the controversial press statement has defamed them.

    “In fact, if the statement is considered defamatory whoever is injured would have to institute a civil suit where he will be required to put his own reputation in issue”.

    To buttress his argument, Falana cites a related and decided case of the Court  of Appeal.

    “In Arthur Nwankwo v The State (1985) 4 NCLR 228, the Court of Appeal had cautioned public officers in Nigeria to desist from invoking undemocratic laws which were introduced by the earstwhile British colonial regime to harass or intimidate their political opponents. According to Olajide Olatawura JCA (as he then was of blessed memory):

    Read Also: IGP  orders Afegbua’s arrest

    “The decision of the founding fathers of this present Constitution which guarantees freedom of speech which must include freedom to criticize should be praised and any attempt to derogate from it except as provided in the Constitution must be resisted. Those in public office should not be intolerant of criticism. Where a writer exceeds the bounds there should be a resort to the law of libel where the plaintiff must of necessity put his character and reputation in issue.”

    He said; “Since General Babangida has now turned round to insist that he authorised Mr. Afegbua to issue the controversial statement it is hoped that he will be prepared to say so in a criminal court.

    “His testimony will go a long way to destroy the criminal case which the Inspector-General intends to institute against Mr. Afegbua”.

    Falana accused the IGP of defaming Afegbua by declaring him wanted and for portraying him as a fugitive running from the law.

    He advised the IGP to withdraw the statement.

    “It is undoubtedly that it is the Inspector General of police who has defamed  Mr. Afegbua  by  portraying him as a fugitive from the law.  Therefore, Mr. Idris is advised to withdraw the offensive declaration without any further delay”, he stated.

    Falana recalled that Babangida, last Sunday, issued a press statement through his press secretary, Mr. Kassim Afegbua. He noted that in the statement, the former military ruler was said to have advised President Mohammadu Buhari not to participate in the 2019 presidential election.

    He also noted that Babangida, in his characteristic manner, promptly disowned the well publicised press statement and the views ascribed to him by Mr. Afegbua.

    He said since this is not the first time that General Babangida has disowned controversial statements made by him, Mr. Afegbua ought to have been more circumspect in issuing this particular statement.

    “However, notwithstanding that the retired General has dissociated himself from the statement the Inspector-General of Police, Mr. Ibrahim Idris has declared Mr. Afegbua wanted for alleged “character defamation”.

    “By declaring Mr. Afegbua wanted when he has not failed to honour the invitation of the Police, the Inspector-General of police has over reached himself”, he argued.

    Falana however, advised the IGP not to popularise the discredited views of both Generals Olusegun Obasanjo and Ibrahim Babangida who, he said, failed woefully to institutionalised democracy, rule of law, human rights, self-reliance and probity during the 20 years that both of them had ruled the country.

  • Falana urges NASS to pass whistle-blowing protection bill

    Falana urges NASS to pass whistle-blowing protection bill

    Femi Falana, a Human Right Activist, has called on the National Assembly ( NASS ) to hasten the passage of the Whistle-blowing Protection Bill to facilitate the fight against corruption in the country.

    Falana made the call on Tuesday in Abuja at the National Stakeholders’ Summit on Whistle-blowing, organised by the African Centre for Media and Information Literacy ( AFRIMIL ).

    He said that the bill, when passed, would facilitate the fight against corruption by protecting persons with potential and reliable information on the war against corruption.

    “The bill amongst other things aims at ensuring that persons, who make disclosures about corruption do not suffer reprisals in relation to such disclosures and are duly protected by the law,” he said.

    The activist also called for proper implementation of the whistle-blowing policy, adding that it was the duty of every citizen to report crimes for societal change.

    He decried the attitude of brutal attacks on whistle-blowers and numerous challenges faced by them, which included denial of entitlements, charge to court, attacks and murder.

    Falana, however, appealed that recovered loots should not be channeled towards funding the budget but rather should be a special funding in the country.

    “Unless we convince the government to uphold the protection of fighting corruption, all the suggestions are meaningless,’’ he added.

    Falana tasked whistle-blowers not to limit their monitoring to Independent Corrupt Practices Commission ( ICPC ) and Economic and Financial Crimes Commission ( EFCC ) but to spread it to other agencies.

    He pledged to take up any matter concerning harassment of whistle-blowers once reported.

    Earlier, Mr Chido Onumah, Coordination of the centre, said that as part of its accountability and governance initiative, it inaugurated the Corruption Anonymous (CORA) project, which aimed at engaging civil society and Nigerians in tackling corruption.

    “The CORA project, which is supported by ‘The John D and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,’ is aimed at creating awareness about whistle-blowing and making Nigerians see it as a tool for reducing corruption,’’ he said.

    Onumah recalled that the Federal Government in December 2016 announced a Whistle-Blower policy, which could offer financial incentives for citizens who give genuine information that could lead to recovery of loots.

    He noted that the summit with the theme: ‘Fight Against Corruption: Harnessing the Whistle-blowing Opportunity’ was one of its interventions designed for critical stakeholders responsible for its implementation.

    “Whistle-blowing, as an instrument of tackling corruption, can only survive where the safety of whistle-blower is guaranteed ,” he noted.

    AFRIMIL, an NGO, which focuses on media, information, research, advocacy and training is dedicated to providing skills required for social engagement.

    NAN

  • Falana, George, laud presidential panel on armed forces

    Falana, George, laud presidential panel on armed forces

    Mr Femi Falana (SAN) and Prof. Akinseye George (SAN) on Thursday applauded the Presidential Investigation Panel on Armed Forces in Nigeria.

    The panel was set up to review compliance of the Armed Forces with Human Rights Obligations and Rules of Engagement.

    The Senior Advocates of Nigeria made their commendations on the sideline of the panel’s winding up of its hearing in Abuja.

    Mr Fanala (SAN) is the counsel to detained leader of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria ( IMN ), El-Zakzaky, while Prof. George (SAN) is the counsel to the Nigerian Army.

    Falana, however, said that with the way the panel had conducted its proceedings he was confident that the outcome would be pleasing to all parties.

    According to him, I know the panel is made up of people of proven integrity and I know that based on the evidence before them, they will write reports and make appropriate recommendations in the interest of our country.

    George also said that the panel had done a great job, adding that the establishment of the panel by the Federal Government was laudable.

    “We pray and hope that the report of this panel will not go down the drain, the whole world is waiting for the outcome of this panel.

    “Everybody has been saying investigate and now the Federal Government has taken the bull by the horn, government has done the right thing by setting up this investigation.

    “It is hoped that the reports of the panel will not end on a shelve, and that the report will be implemented by the government so as to show the good work that the military is doing and area of improvement.

    Meanwhile, Prof George said that the panel had helped to show that the Nigeria military personnel were well trained, adding that they had done a great job to preserve and defence the country from being overrun by terrorists.

    According to him, the efforts of the Nigeria army in various operations are like surgical operations; when a patient goes for surgical operation, certainly there must be pain.

    He added that the purpose was not to kill the patient but to preserve the life of the patient, adding that this is the sense in which we must understand the operation of the Nigeria military in situations of conflict.

    “The military has done a great service for the country by preventing and minimising the impact of such negative tendencies.

    According to him, there are no systematic violations of human right or pattern of violation of human rights by the military; it has not been established to the best of my knowledge.

    NAN

  • Corruption may ‘kill’ Nigeria soon – Oyebode

    Corruption may ‘kill’ Nigeria soon – Oyebode

    Professor of International Law and Jurisprudence, University of Lagos, Akin Oyebode, has warned that “If drastic measures are not put in place urgently to contain it, corruption might ultimately result in the mortality of Nigeria as a nation-state”.

    Oyebode spoke on Thursday at a roundtable organized by Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) in collaboration with the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and held at the CITIHEIGHT Hotel, Sheraton Opebi Link Road, Ikeja Lagos.

    Delivering a paper pn Strategies for Mobilizing Mass Action to Demand Anti-Corruption Reforms and an End to Impunity for Grand Corruption in Nigeria insisted that “mass action by the citizens is urgently needed to put pressure on authorities to end impunity for grand corruption in the country.”

    According to him, the people must be enlisted in the war against corruption. Nigerians should start anti-corruption clubs in schools, radio jingles should be put in place to fight corruption, carry placards, go outside, organize sit-ins like SERAP is doing presently, Nigerians should be mobilized against corruption and now take their destiny in their hands. The fight should not be left alone to organizations like SERAP and when the State wants to attack organizations like SERAP, the masses should fight for them.”

    Related:  Stealing is not Corruption

    Oyebode also said: “The recent attempt by the National Assembly with the NGO bill to control, monitor and eventually sequester CSOs all because of the excuse that some CSOs are corrupt should not be allowed. Cutting off the head is not the cure for a headache, the bill is an overkill. If they cage organizations like SERAP, who will fight for the masses. The government does not want anybody to act as an impediment to their thievery activities.”

    “Corruption is now thriving more than ever before, despite the ongoing fight against it. However, international law has really helped with a plethora of laws against corruption, it now behoves on citizens to take advantage of these laws to fight against corruption,” Oyebode also said.

    The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami SAN who was represented by his Senior Assistant Abiodun Aikomo said, “The disconnect between our prosperity and where we are is corruption. We have to be patriotic, only Nigerians can do something about corruption. To file paper in court, you have to shake body. Corruption as unfortunately attained legitimacy in Nigeria, we are all encouraging corruption that is killing us. Imagine a million citizens fighting against corruption, we have a government committed to the fight. Let us all fight it and shun greed”

    Human rights lawyer Femi Falana SAN in his contribution said that: “We must stop our lawyers from terrorizing our courts and judges. We must get our judges to take charge of their courts.”

    According to Falana, religious leaders should stop confusing our people. Our churches and traditional rulers should stop praying for thieves. This is how low we have sunk. What are we as individuals doing to stop these politicians, let’s start with Lagos, let’s start asking our legislators how much they are being paid for doing what? Let our church stop conferring honours on criminals. Also, our universities should be encouraged to join in the fight.”

    Participants at the event included: Chief Barr. O.M Bakara- representing HRM, Elegushi of Ikate Land Mr Osita Nwajah, representing Ibrahim Magu the chair of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission; Rabiat Umar ICPC; Chief Abayomi Sunday and Chief Moshood Onikoyi, representing Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi & Imoba Land; Padma Igbabe Ford Foundation; Dr Dayo Ayoade, Faculty of Law UNILAG; Marijke Petri Wife of the Netherlands Ambassador to Nigeria; and Depo Adeniran, Coalition against Corrupt Leaders.

    All participants committed themselves to promoting an end to impunity for grand corruption in the country by among others, ensuring the effective prosecution and jailing of high-ranking corrupt officials and securing recovering of stolen public assets.

    Oyebode’s paper reads in part: “It is not enough to have fanciful anti-corruption laws. More important is the need to get the generality of the popular masses wedded to the crusade in order to make it a success. The reticence and lethargy of our people generally would need to be confronted. Without the cooperation and collaboration of generality of the people, the anti-corruption bodies might end up little more than paper tigers.

    “The legality or validity of the anti-corruption war is not in doubt. However, the practical implementation of the relevant laws is fraught with considerable difficulty, not least, the extent to which the generality of the populace is at one with the government. Jurisprudentially speaking, validity is a question of imputation while efficacy is more a matter of fact or causation. Accordingly, it is imperative to consider the role of the people in relation to the struggle to contain corrupt practices.

    “It is on record that Nigeria has a set of anti-corruption laws reflecting the will and intention of the government to battle the virus to the hilt. However, the efficacy of anti-corruption legislation, coupled with judicial pronouncements and conviction and sentencing of corrupt elements would require the complement of mass action and commitment arising from general awareness and resolve to collaborate with on-going efforts. Inevitably, government action in this regard must be undertaken for the anti-corruption struggle to bear fruit.

    “It is hardly an exaggeration that corruption has levelled, perhaps, the most virulent attack on Nigeria’s bodypolitik. Despite all the hue and cry over the debilitating consequences of corruption on the country’s socio-political fabric, it is sad but true that the virus has continued to fester in leaps and bounds. The sad situation today is that despite its pernicious nature, corruption seems to have found a comfortable nest in the lives and consciousness of many of our people, thereby giving the false and erroneous impression that Nigerians have generally accepted it as a fact of life.

    “To the extent that Nigerians take the saying that there is no free lunch literally, the culture of the customary gift or dash, jara, egunje, etc, have been internalized among the population so much so that there is little surprise if and when a Nigerian evinces corrupt practice in the form of bribe-taking, over-invoicing and kindred under-the-table dealings. There are even popular sayings approving of all manner of unjust enrichment at the point of duty.

    “In a country where a President could once declare that stealing was not corruption, the most important Commandment would seem to be the Eleventh: Thou shall not be caught or found out!

    “In Nigeria, there is a plethora of laws against corruption and related manifestations of the “ugly and unacceptable face of capitalism.” Aside from the Criminal and Penal Codes, the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000 laid the ground rule for combating the odious crime.

    “The establishment of the ICPC, EFCC and Code of Conduct Tribunal as well as promulgation of the Anti-Money Laundering Act and designation of special courts to handle cases of corruption in addition to the establishment of a scheme for whistle-blowers and witnesses protection are clearly pointers to the resolve of the Nigerian government to aggressively confront the ogre of corruption.

    “Perception is an important factor in the efficacy of law generally. Therefore, a lot of work still needs to be done concerning the extent of popular understanding of requisite anti-corruption legislation and appreciation of the commitment of the government to its anti-corruption programme and policy. This necessitates broad mass enlightenment on the various laws with a view to eliciting the understanding, support and collaboration of the masses of the people.

    “The people must be made aware of the nexus between corruption by the political leadership and their niggardly circumstances. Once they realize that misappropriation of the nation’s resources by leaders at various levels leads to their impoverishment, their approval and support for all measures adopted to contain graft and unjust enrichment within the polity become pretty well assured.

    “The people must be enlisted in the war against corruption by encouraging them to engage in mass action through their participation in mass rallies, street demonstrations, public debates and write-up in the mass media against corrupt practices. More anti-corruption clubs need to be organized in the schools and higher educational institutions to collaborate in waging the anti-corruption struggle.

    “However, it would seem that no better encouragement and sensitization against corruption exist more than the palpable resolve of the government to take decisive action against those who have been proven to violate the laws and social ethos against the odious and unwholesome practice of corruption. By effecting prompt and adequate sanction against acts of malfeasance, the anti-corruption crusade would win new and more committed converts among the population.

    “Religious bodies, churches and mosques should not be left out of the anti-corruption crusade. The leaders of religious organizations should be encouraged to be at the vanguard of the campaign against corrupt practices, more so as they exercise tremendous influence and impact among their various congregations.

    “It is my considered opinion that the effort to contain corrupt practices should no longer be seen as just that of the government. Of equal if not, in fact, a more important role is that of society which needs to be on the same page if the anti-corruption war is to succeed. Admittedly, no country has been able to wipe out corruption in its entirety but there examples of countries where the vermin has been curtailed to its barest minimum.”

  • Falana challenges state governments to generate electricity

    Falana challenges state governments to generate electricity

    Lawyer-cum rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN), on Wednesday urged state governments to generate and distribute their own electricity to improve the well -being of people in their states.

    He said the states have constitutional responsibility to generate, distribute and transmit electricity.

    Falana stated these following revelations that the administrations of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Shehu Musa Yar’ Adua and Goodluck Jonathan allegedly squandered over N11 trillion on electricity while the nation remains in darkness.

    He spoke during the launching of a report by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), titled: “From Darkness to Darkness: How Nigerians are paying the price for corruption in the electricity sector,” held at Weston Hotels, Ikeja.

    The report was supported by the MacArthur Foundation.

    Falana, who chaired the event, told state governments to challenge the laws restricting them from generating electricity in their states.

    He described the Power Reforms Act of 2005 which concentrate power and electricity generation on the Federal Government and private companies contrary to the provisions of the constitution as “largely illegal.”

    He said: “That’s why we are challenging state governments,  stop going to Abuja, stop begging federal government to give you power to establish electricity companies in your state.

    “You have the right. If individuals can do that and generate electricity they needed, why should you go to Abuja to get a licence to generate electricity in your state?”

    Falana said it is high time for state governments to begin to exercise their constitutional rights by challenging the control of electricity generation, distribution and transmission by the federal government.

    He added: “Items 13 and 14 of the schedule to the constitution stipulate that state governments shall have power to generate electricity outside the national grid.

    “It goes further to say that the House of Assembly of each state shall make a law for the establishment of electricity boards in all states. But they are not there to provide electricity for the people outside the national grid.

    “I generate electricity in my home, in my office. So why can the 20 million people?

    “So, we must really challenge the control of our affairs by the government in Abuja.”

    He said the failure of the power sector has affected all spheres of national life.

  • No court empowered NASS to increase budget – Falana

    No court empowered NASS to increase budget – Falana

    Activist-lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), on Tuesday faulted the National Assembly’s claim that the Federal High Court empowered it to increase budget estimates.

    The lawyer said he was the plaintiff in a 2014 suit that challenged the National Assembly oversight powers on the budget, adding that although it was dismissed for lack of locus standi, the court never made such a pronouncement.

    Falana said he challenged the extent of the National Assembly’s oversight powers to rewrite the Appropriation Bill or increase the budget estimates presented to it by the President.

    He said in dismissing the case, Justice Gabriel Kolawole questioned his legal right to institute the action and described him as a “meddlesome interloper” despite acknowledging him as “a renowned human rights crusader.”

    He said, “No doubt, the learned trial judge said the National Assembly is not a rubber stamp parliament. The incontestable statement has since been twisted to give the very erroneous impression that the power of the National Assembly to increase the budget has been judicially recognised.

    “In the entire 22-page judgment the learned trial judge never said that the National Assembly has the power to increase any budget proposal submitted to it by the President. On the contrary, the Federal High Court made it categorically clear that the National Assembly lacks the legislative powers to prepare ‘budget estimates’ for the President or ‘disregard the budget proposals laid before it and substitute it with its own estimates.

    “Even though I have taken the legal battle over the dismissal of the case to the Court of Appeal, I wish to state, without any fear of contradiction, that the learned trial judge concurred with my submission that the Constitution has not vested the National Assembly with powers to increase the budget.”

    Falana quoted Justice Kolawole as saying: “The whole essence of the ‘budget estimates’ being required to be laid before the third defendant (National Assembly), is to enable the third defendant as the assembly of the representatives of the people, to debate the said ‘budget proposals’ and to make its own well informed legislative inputs into it.

    “What the third defendant cannot do is to prepare ‘budget estimates’ for the first defendant (President) or to disregard the proposals laid before it and substitute it with its own estimates. The rationale for this is simple: It is the Executive Arm under the leadership of the 1st Defendant that controls and superintends all agencies, corporations and commissions that generate the revenue for the running of the government.”

    According to Falana, the judge rightly stated that the National Assembly was not a “rubber stamp parliament” because it is empowered to debate and make its informed inputs into budget proposals.

     

  • Falana: National Assembly wrong to alter budget

    Falana: National Assembly wrong to alter budget

    Lagos lawyer Mr. Femi Falana (SAN) has faulted the National Assembly for inserting new projects into the 2017 Budget.

    Falana in an interview on Channels TV said the Executive should get the Supreme Court to settle the matter once and for all.

    He said: “We have been on this game since 1999. This is about the fourth president. Every year, we have this controversy. It is totally uncalled for over the power of the National Assembly to tinker with the budget…We have advised the government to put this matter to rest by approaching the Supreme Court. The precious time of the nation has been wasted over who has the right to the project. In 2014, I went to court… The court agreed that it is the duty of the president to prepare the budget, while the national Assembly , even though not a rubber stamp, shall inform input into the budget. But that does not mean, according to the judgment, that it can be substituted with another by the National Assembly.

    “The constitution says the ‘President shall cause to be prepared’. What does preparation mean? It means the Ministry of Budget, the Ministry of Finance and all the relevant agencies of government will prepare the budget and collate the figure…the Presidency would have done some feasibility studies. If that is presented to the National Assembly, it has the right to say ‘a similar secretariat was built in Ghana at a lower cost’. But you cannot say it will cost N205b without any Bill of quantity…You cannot singlehandedly introduce new projects. Who is going to fund it?”