Tag: FIFA

  • International transfer spending hits record $9.76 billion, says FIFA

    International transfer spending hits record $9.76 billion, says FIFA

    Transfer spending broke new ground in the close-season window when clubs around the world spent nearly $10 billion on international transfers, global soccer body FIFA said in a report released on Wednesday.

    Clubs recorded nearly 12,000 international transfers where total spending on fees amounted to $9.76 billion, FIFA said, representing an increase of more than 50% compared to the same period in 2024.

    Women’s soccer also broke records with more than 1,100 international transfers where the fees exceeded $12 million.

    Orlando Pride signed winger Lizbeth Ovalle, who became the most expensive transfer in women’s football when the Mexican moved from Liga MX club side Tigres Femenil for a fee of $1.5 million.

    “We have observed a transfer market in full swing both in men’s and women’s football,” Emilio Garcia Silvero, FIFA’s Chief Legal & Compliance Officer, said in a statement.

    “While this is a relevant development in men’s football a year ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026, the increasing figures in women’s football transfers are equally remarkable as they confirm the exponential growth of the women’s game at club level.”

    Read Also: Jalla carpets NSC, NFF on ‘no show’  at Rufai’s burials

    England’s Premier League was once again front and centre in the transfer market, spending more than $3 billion in transfer fees in the last three months.

    German clubs alone received $893 million from their English counterparts, highlighted by Florian Wirtz’s move from Bayer Leverkusen to Liverpool in a deal reportedly worth 116 million pounds ($156.70 million) with add-ons.

    Liverpool also signed Hugo Ekitike from Eintracht Frankfurt while Newcastle United signed German forward Nick Woltemade from VfB Stuttgart in a club-record deal, with both deals reported to be 69 million pounds.

    Germany were second in total spending at $980 million while Italy were third at $950 million. In terms of incoming transfers, England had 535 players come in followed by Portugal (479) and Brazil (425).

  • FIFA free points, my foot!

    FIFA free points, my foot!

    What kind of soccer administrators do we have in Nigeria, and how did they get into such positions of trust? I have this funny tendency of looking through my phone for news, though I end up feeling very upset listening or reading information therein, which would have been better ignored.

    One of such interviews was that on Facebook, where a top NFF boss revealed that Nigeria had filed a protest to FIFA urging the soccer ruling body to, as a matter of necessity, deduct three points from South Africa’s points haul and hand them to Lesotho who didn’t lodge any protest when they played against South Africa. It would have been better if this official had kept quiet rather than utter such laughable statement.

    This official, who ought to have covered his face in tears, prided himself in telling the world how Nigeria fielded an ineligible player in an away game against Algeria during the 2018 FIFA World Cup qualifiers. A clear case of failure of leadership, the official ought to have kept his trap shut rather than bask in airs while spewing excuses that belie his academic qualifications. In other climes, this official ought to have lost his job to save Nigeria from such anomalies in the future. Isn’t it shameful that Nigeria is fighting for action to be taken against an offender who incidentally is one of our group opponents? The immediate poser would be, if the points would be added to ours?

    Read Also: Nigerian scholar Tolulope Oladeji wins prestigious USGIF doctoral scholarship

    I ask, isn’t it true that FIFA alerts federations through the mail, informing them about ineligible players and their punishments before each round of matches begin? Our soccer chieftains should face the business of getting the 12 points left and see what others in the group can get. Otherwise, we would find ourselves in a clay pot and rat situation, where others in the group would be working to eliminate Nigeria. I’m glad that renowned journalist and lawyer, Osasu Obayiuwana spoke with a spokesman of FIFA on the delay and he gave his explanation.

    Obayiuwana revealed to OwnGoalNigeria.com that: “The matter should be before the FIFA disciplinary committee. They don’t tell the administration what cases they have before it, as they are independent.”

    “We will only hear of their decision when they have made it. If they have not made a pronouncement before South Africa’s next match in September, I will encourage you to ask why a decision has not been taken on this matter,” the FIFA source said.

    Perhaps, NFF’s men and their trumpeters would let the three points which won’t be ours be, and face the daunting task of preparing a battle-ready Super Eagles now that the shocking news of goalkeeper Stanley Nwabali’s injury was made public on Monday. The optics of Nwabali being attended to frantically on the pitch by the doctors showed how serious the injury was. In fact, Nwabali was stretchered out of the pitch into the ambulance and driven to the hospital for further treatment. If the Chippa United man is ruled out, Chelle will be forced to look elsewhere. The alternatives include former Bendel Insurance goalkeeper Amas Obasogie, one-time Hapoel Jerusalem shot-stopper Adebayo Adeleye, and teenage prospect Ebenezer Harcourt. None, however, possesses the experience or reliability of Nwabali, whose presence has been vital for Nigeria since his emergence.

    Surprised? Don’t be. Last weekend on this column, I warned about the effects of the voodoo called injuries as if was a seer who foresaw what has happened to Nwabali. Yes, I’m not a seer but my experience on this job has taught me a few things which I reveal intermittently here for those who have ears and can assimilate what they read in this column, without sounding immodest.

  • India faces world football ban again

    India faces world football ban again

    India could be banned from world football for the second time in three years after FIFA and the Asian governing body demanded it implement a new constitution by October 30 or risk suspension.

    World governing body FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) sent a joint letter to the All India Football Federation (AIFF) president Kalyan Chaubey expressing “profound concern” at the continued failure to finalise and adopt the constitution.

    “Failure to meet this schedule will leave us with no alternative but to refer the matter to the relevant FIFA decision-making body for consideration and decision,” said the letter, seen by AFP. “AIFF must regard this communication as binding and requiring immediate compliance in order to safeguard its rights as a member of FIFA and the AFC,” it added.

    The AIFF constitution has been in India’s Supreme Court awaiting a decision since 2017.

    A suspension would mean India national teams and clubs being barred from all international competitions.

    Read Also: NFF lauds  Adeniyi on election as Chairperson of WCO

    FIFA previously suspended India in August 2022 for third-party influence after the Supreme Court appointed a committee of administrators to run the AIFF.

    The ban was lifted a few days later, paving the way for the AIFF to elect Chaubey.

    India’s top-flight club football is currently in disarray.

    The Indian Super League (ISL) could fold over a dispute between the AIFF and its commercial partner.

    This season’s ISL kickoff has been delayed with thousands of players and staff in danger of losing their jobs.

    A rights agreement between the AIFF and the company that runs the ISL, Football Sports Development Limited, ends on December 8 and is yet to be renewed

    The AIFF has been unable to come up with a revival plan for the ISL, which is usually played between September and April.

    Players union FIFPRO Asia/Oceania raised the issue with FIFA last week.

  • Is FIFA Father Christmas?

    Is FIFA Father Christmas?

    Suddenly, some of them who chained our football in the past with their tunnel vision ideas and illusory concepts have again woken up from deep sleep to reinvent what they destroyed over nine years ago. Do they think that when they were snoring and producing frightening sounds in their sleep, our group opponents left their doors ajar? Certainly not. Where were our sports administrators when some countries in Nigeria’s World Cup group chose some of the South African cities as their home grounds for their qualifiers? What did they do to stop the matches? Do they now want to shift the goalposts when the fixtures have just four matches left? Who does that? Dey play, as they say in pidgin English.

    Our football buffs have spent the interlude between matches to ‘leak’ the story that the South Africans fielded an ineligible player against Lesotho, which could see them lose the three points. What they have refused to reveal is that there isn’t any protest lodged against the South Africans? So, on what basis would FIFA be relying on to punish them? Or do our people think that FIFA men are Father Christmases?

    Yes, Bafana Bafana infringed on the law but who would the three points deducted be credited to when indeed there isn’t any protest? Is there a precedent case to rely on? Isn’t it true that South Africa’s remaining games are against foes in their group in South African cities? I foresee a situation where Bafana Bafana would play the spoilsport whenever Nigeria plays against those countries that have chosen South Africa as their home ground.

    Nigeria might as well bid the 2026 World Cup goodbye if not for the unpredictable results from games. However, much of what we tag as surprises during games comes from serious-minded teams hungry for glory and being coached by men or women with high tactical savvy to outwit their opponents. Not docile coaches who look on like morons when things go awry for their teams during matches. I wonder what these administrators would be saying to themselves after seeing the Super Eagles draw three home games inside the Stadium of Champions in Uyo? Who does that and expects to snatch a World Cup qualification ticket? People were deceived to believe that the Eagles had arrived with the 2-0 spanking of Rwanda on away soil. But our World Cup fumbling continued when the Eagles drew 1-1 against Lesotho in Uyo, a few days later.

    Read Also: From consumption to production: unlocking Nigeria’s potential

    How I wish these people would jointly sign a communiqué apologising to Nigerians over another failed World Cup appearance in 2026, and save us the heartache by collectively resigning from their posts. The South Africans won’t bottle up this unique opportunity, especially on the heels of parading an unqualified player in one of their World Cup qualifiers.

    The big poser people have been struggling to comprehend is if Eric Chelle can be trusted to rescue our World Cup qualifiers? I respond by asking if we have the players to play the games of their lives, beginning with the September 9 qualifier against Bafana Bafana in South Africa? That is the game-changer for Nigeria to return to the title chase for Group C’s qualification ticket.

    Nigeria’s quest for Group C’s 2026 sole World Cup ticket was thrown into the lagoon with the recruitment of Jose Peseiro, whose coaching record of being sacked is still legendary, not forgetting that he was sacked by a club in Africa after his reign as Nigeria’s coach. It was bad enough that Gernot Rohr wasn’t good enough. Recruiting Peseiro as Rohr’s replacement was the last straw that broke the proverbial Carmel’s back.

  • FIFA opens major Africa Office in Rabat

    FIFA opens major Africa Office in Rabat

    World soccer governing body FIFA has opened its major Africa office in the Moroccan capital, Rabat, further confirming the North African country as the hub of its operation on the continent.

    The state-of-the-art office at the Mohammed VI Complex aims to strengthen support for African federations in their development projects and further reflects FIFA’s desire to establish a lasting presence on the continent.

    The opening of the office follows a signing of a Host Agreement last December in Marrakech between the key stakeholders: FIFA, the Kingdom of Morocco and Royal Moroccan Football Federation (FRMF).

    Rabat becomes the latest city to host a FIFA office after Paris, Miami and Jakarta, and reinforces FIFA’s engagement with all regions and affirms commitment to developing football across the globe.

    FIFA President Gianni Infantino said: “Today is certainly a wonderful day, it’s a special day, a glorious day, a joyful day. We will write, in gold letters, the wonderful history of FIFA, of football in Africa, of football in Morocco, of football in the world.

    “It’s an incredible and beautiful complex, and I want to start by thanking Morocco, thanking His Majesty King Mohammed VI, for making this possible

    “It is witness to a country that is projected into the future, to a continent that is projected into the future, and to the work that all of us do for this incredible sport.”

    Read Also: Boos, applause for Trump at FIFA Club World Cup final

    The new office will coordinate with existing FIFA regional offices in Brazzaville, Dakar, Johannesburg and Kigali, in directing and implementing key policies for the development of African football across all levels.

    Also in attendance were FIFA General Secretary Mattias Grafström, CAF President Patrice Motsepe and his General Secretary, Veron Mosengo-Omba, FRMF President Fouzi Lekja, Moroccan government officials amongst others.

    Morocco has made extraordinary progress in the last few years, both in performances on the field and in hosting events.

    The North African country will become the second African country to host the FIFA World Cup staging the tournament jointly with Portugal and Spain in 2030.

  • Record Prize $36.5 million up for grabs at  FIFA Arab Cup Qatar 2025™

    Record Prize $36.5 million up for grabs at  FIFA Arab Cup Qatar 2025™

    The Local Organising Committee (LOC) of the FIFA Arab Cup Qatar 2025™ has announced that the tournament prize fund will amount to more than USD 36.5 million (QAR 132.9m), in what marks a new benchmark and places the FIFA Arab Cup clearly alongside the most prestigious international football tournaments globally.

    H.E. Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa bin Ahmed Al Thani, Minister of Sports and Youth and LOC Chairman, said: “This announcement further elevates the stature of the FIFA Arab Cup – a tournament we brought back to life in 2021 – and reflects Qatar’s leading role in the development of football across the region, continent and around the world. It demonstrates our unwavering commitment to football and the positive values it promotes – unity, opportunity, and pride. This tournament is a celebration of Arab football, a platform for regional solidarity, and an inspiration for young talent across generations.”

    H.E. added: “The FIFA Arab Cup forms a vital part of the legacy of the FIFA World Cup, which was by the testimony of many far and wide the most successful edition of the tournament. Hosting world-class tournaments like the Arab Cup and the upcoming U-17 World Cup helps us build on that momentum, reinforcing Qatar’s position as a premier global sporting destination and leaving a meaningful legacy that benefits our communities and the broader region.”

    Read Also: Gateway Games: Edo cycling coach suspended for unruly behaviour

    Scheduled to run from 1 to 18 December 2025, the FIFA Arab Cup Qatar 2025™ will once again culminate on Qatar National Day, offering a festive conclusion to a tournament that showcases Arab football at its finest. The tournament’s Final Draw will take place on 25 May 2025 in Doha.

    Following the success of the 2021 edition, which drew strong regional interest in Qatar’s state-of-the-art vibrant stadiums, the 2025 tournament is expected to deliver even greater excitement, with fans from across the Arab world coming together to celebrate their culture and passion for football.

    Qatar’s continued role as a host of major global football tournaments reflects the country’s strategic investment in sport as part of its long-term national vision and development plan. From the landmark FIFA World Cup 2022™ to the AFC Asian Cup 2023, the AFC U-23 Asian Cup 2024, and recent international club competitions like the FIFA Intercontinental Cup, Qatar has consistently delivered successful, world-class events

  • FIFA targets $1 billion revenue from Women’s World Cup

    FIFA targets $1 billion revenue from Women’s World Cup

    FIFA is targeting $1 billion in revenue from the Women’s World Cup, global soccer governing body’s president Gianni Infantino said at the Saudi Arabia-U.S. Investment Forum 2025 in Riyadh.

    The 2023 Women’s World Cup, hosted by Australia and New Zealand, broke even after generating more than $570 million in revenue.

    “Women’s football and women in football are crucially important…,” said Infantino. “It’s growing as well, and exponentially, and we are targeting that as well to have $1 billion revenue just with the Women’s World Cup to reinvest in the women’s game.”

    The next women’s World Cup in 2027 will be hosted by Brazil, making it the first edition to be held in South America. The United States is poised to be named host of the 2031 edition, which will be expanded to 48 teams from 32.

    Read Also: AFCON U20 : NFF submits final 23-man squad  as Flying Eagles  off to Cairo weekend

    Infantino also said there was massive potential for football to generate more revenue outside Europe.

    “If the rest of the world, in particular Saudi Arabia or the United States of America, would do just 20% of what Europe does in soccer, we (could reach an amount of over) half a trillion (dollars) or more of GDP impact (with our sport),” he added.

    “Saudi Arabia, by the way, is doing exceptionally good, as well, by creating a women’s league, a women’s national team. Women’s football is really the only team sport for women that have such a huge audience and impact as well.”

  • FIFA approves 48 teams for Women’s World Cup from 2031

    FIFA approves 48 teams for Women’s World Cup from 2031

    The Women’s World Cup will be expanded from 32 to 48 teams from the 2031 edition onwards after the FIFA Council approved the proposal at a virtual meeting on Friday.

    The 48-team World Cup will adopt a 12-group format, increasing the total number of matches from 64 to 104 – the same as the expanded men’s World Cup in 2026 – and extending the tournament by one week.

    The 2027 Women’s World Cup, which will be held in Brazil, will have 32 teams.

    The 2023 edition in Australia and New Zealand was the first to have 32 teams, up from 24 in the 2019 tournament hosted by France.

    “This is not just about having 16 more teams playing in the FIFA Women’s World Cup but taking the next steps in relation to the women’s game in general,” FIFA President Gianni Infantino said in a statement.

    “More FIFA member associations have the chance to benefit from the tournament to develop their women’s football structures from a holistic point of view,”he said.

    Read Also; Tinubu pledges commitment to promoting independence of judiciary

    The U.S. is poised to be named host of the 2031 Women’s World Cup as the only bid, making the third time the country will stage the tournament after previously hosting it in 1999 and 2003.

    The United Kingdom is the sole bidder for the 2035 tournament. Hosts for the 2031 and 2035 editions are yet to be ratified.

    Although there are concerns that games could be one-sided with 48 teams, Infantino said the 2023 edition showed sides are closing the gap on the elite.

    The  Women’s World Cup 2023, the first in which teams from all confederations won at least one game and teams from five confederations reached the knockout stage, mong many other records, set a new standard for global competitiveness,” he added.

    (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)

  • Upfront wages: Who does that?

    Upfront wages: Who does that?

    We have bungled the process of securing the sole qualification ticket for the 2026 World Cup due to the administrative tardiness prevalent in the Dankaro House in Abuja. What is imperative now is how we use the lessons learned from our shambolic outings so far to guide us in winning all our home matches ahead of the 2030 edition. Super Eagles have played four home games in this series without any victory, despite parading a former Africa Footballer of the Year, Victor Osimhen and the incumbent holder of the African diadem, Ademola Lookman. If the Eagles had won three of their four home games, the country wouldn’t be requiring us to do any permutations in nicking the sole qualification in Group C.

    New Zealand, Japan, Iran, Argentina, the United States (US), Mexico, and Canada have already qualified for the 2026 World Cup, with the last three nations (US, Mexico and Canada) qualifying as the co-hosts of the competition. Not for the first time is FIFA toying with the co-hosting competition for the most prestigious soccer tournament in the world  – the senior World Cup. If it had her plans correctly executed, the Eagles would qualify for the 2026 Mundial, having two or three matches left as we did at the 1998 World Cup qualifiers with the White Witch Doctor, Phillipe Troussier as the Head Coach.

    The first lesson learned from our pre-World Cup games is that the NFF chieftains refused to get the Super Eagles a top-rated foreign coach befitting  of our players’ stature. We have thus far used five coaches not forgetting the dictum of too many cooks spoiling the broth. How could the NFF have committed this flaw knowing that for qualifying for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar all the participating countries received over $12 million as qualification bonus? Don’t we know that with the next edition being co-hosted by three nations that the logistics during the competition would be much? Common sense tells us that the qualification bonus would almost be hitting the roof. What a huge loss in the event that the country fails to qualify for the Mundial.

    The pedigree of the new Eagles foreign coach to be recruited would determine the quality of international matches the Super Eagles would play in the next five years. Nigeria has been slated to play three international friendly games in Moscow against Russia on June 6 and the United Cup tournament in London later in June and the NFF and Coach Eric Chelle are up in arms over the kind of players to pick for the matches. When will these people ever be serious, dear reader? You tell me.

    Sadly, these matches won’t attract any points for Nigeria in FIFA’s monthly rankings, making it imperative to ask  to what intent and purpose are these arranged friendlies? Which European club would release their players for such meaningless games? No player would risk his career to play such games only to be injured. What are the security and other guarantees in place for the game against Russia in Moscow on June 8? A non-FIFA ranking game for that matter. How safe is Moscow? Isn’t this another case of failure of leadership?

    How much are the organisers offering if the results of the matches won’t improve our FIFA ranking? Those federation members angling for domestic league players to be included in the squad to prosecute these games certainly have a hidden agenda. Have they considered the difficulties associated with securing entry visas for first time travellers out of the country? Did I hear the whisper of Notre Verbal? Perish that thought with the federation’s way of doing things? Shouldn’t Chelle be allowed to pick those he wants other than having his hands tied to his back?

    Wait a minute. Where in the world have we heard of coaches being paid their wages upfront for close to ten months? What is so special about such a sinister method now that we know that the European season is heading towards a close with many countries set to take stock towards a successful 2025/2026 season?

    This is the second time one would be writing about the need for the NSC boss to stand aside and allow the NFF chieftains to run their show. This way, the NSC can play its supervisory roles when the need arises.

    Imagine the NSC boss telling us that Super Eagles Head Coach, Chelle would be paid upfront until October. The questions the NSC boss ought to have asked those who introduced that style of payment would be what Chelle would be doing after May 31, if he isn’t already in Nigeria? The other questions would be to ask which country does that and why we chose to pay a man for doing nothing simply because he is a football coach? Who cursed Nigeria like this? Did Nigeria beg Chelle to coach Nigeria? Wasn’t he one who applied for the job and went through the screening exercises before he was selected? What is this upfront payment meant to achieve? Pity! We don’t learn from history.

    Read Also: CRIL urges FG to tackle rising insecurity, curb violence in Nigeria

    “It’s not the commission paying directly, the support group is providing relief so the NFF can focus on other critical needs,” Shehu Dikko said in an interview on Eagle 7 FM Sports Radio.

    “We are processing his payment upfront. The idea is to settle him completely, so he can concentrate on getting the team to the World Cup.

    “We’re not part of the contract. But we’re committed to ensuring the coach has all the support he needs. After all, this is about Nigeria. If we can help, we will. And we are doing just that.

    “The bonuses were paid immediately. While the players were still at dinner, before they had even showered, the money was already on the table. That level of organisation shows respect and commitment,” he said.

    What a pity! My dear chairman, when would we stop this rubbish of showing the world that we are a wealthy country? Did Mali pay Chelle upfront when he was their coach? Certainly not. Is this upfront clause contained in his contract? If yes, who signed such a document on Nigeria’s behalf/ If no, why pay a coach who lives outside the country watching our boys during their club games to guide him in picking the country’s best for international assignments?

    For the 2030 edition to be a stroll in the park, the leadership at the Dankaro House must go pending the outcome of the federation’s election which would be the most controversial, except the incumbent board implements the changes as espoused by the 10-year development plan committee headed by one-time NFF Chairman, Alhaji Ibrahim Galadima. The leadership has failed in all ramifications as it appears the last NFF board was better than this, unfortunately.

    A leadership which would have cost Nigeria her passage into the 2018 World Cup by their administrative tardiness in fielding an ineligible Shehu Abdulahi in a deadpan last game against Algeria in Constantine, ought to have been sacked. Not so in Nigeria. He has since then been granted two extensions to his contract. Yet, we expect changes. No chance.

  • $1,000 for what?

    $1,000 for what?

    According to the reports released by FIFA, the total prize money for the FIFA World Cup 2026 will be $896 million for the men’s event. Hmmmm! Who won’t go for it? At the least to have a bite from the Cherry. Any right-thinking group would stop at nothing to get an expert briefing on how to get one of the big banks to do business with them and how best to prosecute a seamless campaign for the 2026 World Cup, where for qualifying for the competition, every qualifying nation gets $12 million as a qualification bonus.

    These figures are mouth-watering for those who know how to make money, not those who lavish cash on nonsense or rely on government money, which is cheap and, most times, unaccountable. Only planless groups watch in awe or scratch their heads when the results of matches go awry. It becomes a tale of the unexpected. We have come to accept these mistakes as the norm despite Nigeria’s six (1994, 1998, 2002, 2010, 2014, and 2018) appearances at Senior World since our debut in 1994 in the United States (US).

    Our sports administrators are suffering from poverty of ideas for the good of the beautiful game here. Rather than get people to think for them, they prefer to stew in their mess. Pity. I was at the Atlanta’96 Olympic Games and one of the few in Nigeria who waited to see the outcome of the women’s long jump before heading for Georgia to watch the Dream Team 1’s crucial game. A classmate at the Government College Ughelli, who I had not seen since 1976, offered to drive a few of us to watch the football game.

    With a car on standby, we watched Chioma Ajuwa leap to glory for Nigeria with a gold medal in a field of world beaters in the women’s story. Goose pimples still run through me, watching Ajunwa trot towards a little girl holding the Nigeria flag to pick it up and continue her lap of honour for medallists. I won’t blame our sports chiefs who chose to travel early for the Dream Team 1 game. What Ajunwa did was magical. It changed the narrative among people, having been tagged a pariah nation due to the devious acts of the goggled one in that inglorious jackboot era of administration.

    Travelling aboard a Greyhound bus all through the night from Atlanta to Philadelphia after the Olympics was joyful as everywhere one went in Philly, the atmosphere changed the moment one was linked to the Games. Spontaneously, you would hear from appreciative Americans and other nationals present ”Nigeria. Kanu, Amokachi, Jay Jay Okocha e.t.c.” Not forgetting photo shots with them as if one bore any of the names mentioned.

    Read Also: Flying Eagles’ preparations for U-20 AFCON excites Zubairu

    Yes, sports is the biggest Public Relations (PR) tool any government can use to change people’s negative perception of any nation free of charge.

    Lottery schemes for funding such things concerning athletes’ welfare, career path growth, healthcare needs, planning such athletes’ future, etc. Others address their monetary problems for sports ambassadors through trust funds specifically for such needs, not otherwise.

    Those who run our football are either too forgetful (forgive me, please), or they intentionally cast an indulgent eye to imminent pitfalls ahead, only to say when such problems arise, ”But I warned earlier, you thought you knew it all.” This is the premise of all issues not only football but all the sports federations. The question to the federations is to plead with the National Sports Commission (NSC) to raise a memo to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to approve a sports budget which would ensure that all requests are accommodated on a four-yearly schedule or a two-year or even one-year to cater for all their needs. The question would be how do other countries run their sports without such hitches?

    It is an insult to pay Super Eagles stars $1,000 for beating Rwanda in Kigali. What can $1000 do for them? I’m sure the boys would have played for free instead of what they were paid weeks after the game. I hope when the players start to skip matches on flimsy grounds or collaborate with their European clubs to feign injuries, we will know where we courted the problem(s). Our administrators are poor students of history.

    We are in a tight corner. Rather than motivate the players with cash to be at their best, we are offering them what they won’t give to their friends. All countries reward their players handsomely. It is the reason they leave their clubs to play for their countries whenever there is a clash of fixtures with their national teams. Does it make any motivational sense for a sane player to leave his club and fly aboard the aircraft for between six to nine hours to Nigeria only to be paid $1,000? Who does that? Imagine what those boys go through for away fixtures taking cognisance of what the Libyans did to them, only to hear on their phones the alert sound for $1,000. What do the accompanying big men earn as estacodes or is it per diem?

    Let’s be fair. The lifespan of athletes is between one year and ten years, barring injuries. Therefore, they need to save for their future. It is the reason clubs splash big cash to sign them. No player would leave a club where he is sure of the three points which could fetch him between $30,000 and $50,000 for a Nigerian assignment to be paid $1,000 after nine weeks. It won’t happen, especially seeing former Nigerian players languishing in penury.  Nothing is free even in Freetown.

    How do you give Victor Osimhen $1000? How do you go from paying these players $10,000 for away victories to that paltry $1,000 fee and we want the boys to fight and qualify for the World Cup? We are NOT going anywhere. How much were the NFF officials paid for just travelling to watch the players while they sweat under harsh climatic conditions representing Nigeria? Is it not true that FIFA would pay us above $12000 for qualifying as a qualification bonus? So, why are we paying the players peanuts? Maybe the NFF should learn from other federations.

    The countries that excel in sporting events have systems that guarantee enough funds for the sportsmen and sportswomen to compete with the best such as tax rebates on sport-friendly firms, lotteries, and businesses owned by wealthy nationals who know what is in such a sponsorship that benefits them by the sitting government. Such financial taxes are spelt out to companies and wealthy citizens after agreements have been reached. These cast-in-stone policies are binding to all the parties to such an extent that breaches are adequately addressed to allow either of the parties to seek redress in court.

    The beauty of this organised method of funding is it gives all the concerned sponsors enough time to schedule their commitments to their operative management boards to provide for them in the yearly budgets for the duration of the contractual agreements with reliant government parastatals for the exercise.

    For Nigeria to achieve excellence and meet the objective requirement for the rapid development of our sports industry, then we must broaden the finance base of the industry and create the right conditions for private sector funding and investment in sports. But, the government must lead this movement by doing away with the fiscal budgets and introducing a sports budget that takes care of the annual, biannual, and quarterly sports competitions such as the World Cup, the Olympics, the Commonwealth Games e.t.c without qualms.

    What do you think, dear reader? You tell me.