Tag: FIRS

  • FIRS unveils new tax regime for multinational companies

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service, (FIRS), on Thursday, unveiled a new tax assessment system that would ensure proper taxation of multinational companies and enterprises operating in the country.

    The Acting Executive Chairman of FIRS, Mr. Kabir Mashi, unveiled the new regime at the second stakeholders’ sensitisation on ‘Transfer Pricing (TP) Returns’ in Abuja.

    Mashi, represented by the Coordinating Director, Field Operation Group, Mr. Ajayi Bamidele, said the regime would help fight tax evasion embedded in “under-pricing” of controlled transactions among enterprises.

    He said that TP would reduce the risk of double taxation, provide taxable persons with certainty and a level playing field between multinational enterprises and independent enterprises doing business in Nigeria.

    The Acting Chairman said the programme was meant to make the various guidelines, forms and documents that would be used to file the TP returns in line with the relevant tax laws.

    He said Nigeria adopted the regulations and began implementation on transfer pricing to address the problem associated with shifting profit among enterprises.

    “The objective is to ensure that taxpayers in Nigeria are taxed on appropriate taxable basis corresponding to the economic activity deployed by them in Nigeria,” he said.

    Mashi also stressed the need for all businesses to play by the rules, adding that the new regime could reposition the country for sustainable economic growth and rapid development.

    He solicited the cooperation of all stakeholders for the successful implementation of the TP regime and emphasised voluntary compliance with the provisions of the TP regulations and the extant tax laws.

    “For us in FIRS, the goal is to implement the transfer pricing regime transparently, efficiently and effectively so as to promote voluntary compliance,” he said.

    The Acting chairman, said that the programme was packaged to guide, sensitise and educate companies on their TP obligations.

    He said it would enable stakeholders express their views on how the implementation of TP regime in Nigeria could be done efficiently.

    Mashi said that the new tax regime had been unveiled in Lagos and would soon be done in Port Harcourt and Kano.

    Highlight of the event, was the presentation of the new regime, including Transfer Pricing Declaration Form and Disclosure Form

  • ‘FIRS generated N9.8tr in two years’

    ‘FIRS generated N9.8tr in two years’

    The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has generated about N9.812 trillion within the last two years, the House of Representative Committee on Finance learnt yesterday.

    Speaking before the Hon. Jibrin Almumin headed Committee during the hearing on the Framework for the 2014 Budget and the economy, the Acting Executive Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service, Alhaji Kabir Mashi, said N5.007 trillion was generated in 2012, while N4. 805 trillion came in 2013.

    The FIRS has earlier claimed in its various statements, including its website, that the collection of N5.007 trillion in 2012, is the largest in the annals of the organisation and that the collection of N4. 805 trillion in 2013 was the second largest.

    While responding to questions by the Committee on the revenue inflow for 2011, 2012 and 2013, as well as its expected income for the current year, Mashi said the organisation overshot its projection for the year 2013 by N405billion.

    His words: “We collected N5.007 trillion in 2012 against our target of N3.6 trillion. In 2011, we collected N4.6 trillion against our budget of N3. 7 trillion. In 2014 the target is N3.9 trillion. We are projecting to collect N4.1 trillion.”

    Mashi, who became the Acting Chairman of the FIRS in April 2012, said the projection of N4.1 trillion is based on the (Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT) benchmark which, he explained, is different from the actual market price of crude oil.

    While treating the FIRS presentation yesterday, Jibrin explained that the process was seamless, because the Cmmittee had partially considered the FIRS projections for the year, while looking at the 2014 Budget of the agency two weeks ago.

  • Ekiti gets ICT award

    Ekiti gets ICT award

    THE Ekiti State government has won the 2014 Alder Top Social Media Brand in the Social Media Icon Government category.

    The Lagos State government came second and the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) third.

    The Alder Social Media Report was put together in 2013 to look at brands that make effective usage of the social media.

    The rankings, carried out by Alder Social Media Ranking (ASMR), are results of a public poll and expert rankings of brands that effectively use social media in Nigeria.

    The Ekiti State government’s website, www.ekitistate.gov.ng, was last year ranked as the best by the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF).

    The Ekiti State government’s Youtube channel has been verified. This makes it the only government Internet video channel to be verified in Nigeria.

    Other brands ranked by ASMR were the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Daystar Christian Centre and the Elevation Church for the Faith Sector. FIRS, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Osun State also joined Ekiti and Lagos States in the government sector ranking. GTB, UBA and First Bank made the ranking in the banking sector.

     

     

  • Reps summon ministers, agencies

    Reps summon ministers, agencies

    The House of Representatives Committee on Finance has invited the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala; the Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison- Madueke and Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, to a hearing over the state of the economy.

    Others invited are: the Ministers of National Planning and Vice Chairman of the National Planning Commission; the Chairman of Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission and the Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).

    A statement, titled: State of the Economy: In Search of Truth, by the Clerk of the Committee on Finance, Farouk Y. Dawaki, said the invitation was necessary to reveal the exact situation of the economy.

    The Abdulmumin Jibrin-led committee said it had also invited revenue generating and independent revenue generating agencies on the status of revenue generation, collections and remittances from 2011 to 2013 and their projection for 2014 fiscal year.

    “These agencies include Nigeria Customs Service, Federal Inland Revenue Service, Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, Central Bank of Nigeria, Raw Materials Research and Development Council and Nigeria Shippers Council to mention a few,” statement said.

     

     

  • How to pay the tax and where to pay the tax

    How to pay the tax and where to pay the tax

    Tax legislation is the act or process of enacting tax laws

    and the body of laws that provide for the levying of

    taxation and tax administration.

    The following are the existing tax legislation in Nigeria, as at 2012:

    • Associated Gas Re-Injection Act

    • Capital Gains Tax Act

    • Casino Taxation Act

    • Companies Income Tax Act

    • Deep Offshore and Inland Basin Production Sharing Contracts Act

    • Education Tax Act

    • Federal Inland Revenue Service (Establishment) Act

    • Income Tax (Authorised Communications) Act

    • Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act

    • Industrial Inspectorate Act

    • National Information Technology Development Act

    • Nigerian Export Processing Zones Act

    • Nigeria LNG (Fiscal Incentive Guarantees and Assurances) Act

    • Oil and Gas Export Free Zones Act

    • Personal Income Tax Act

    • Petroleum Profits Tax Act

    • Value Added Tax Act

    • Stamp Duty Act

    • Taxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection) Act

    Review, amendments and modifications to tax legislation are continuous, evolving with global best practices and in keeping with the local socio-economic realities. The review and amendment of tax legislation is in keeping with the formal tax amendment process as provided for in the Nigerian constitution.

    As a result of the need to continuously review and amend tax legislation, the following tax laws were amended in the respective years indicated hereunder:

    • Companies Income Tax Act – 2007

    • Personal Income Tax Act – 2011

    The Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) is presently before the National Assembly and when passed into law will replace the Petroleum Profits Tax Act. In addition, there is an on-going process to overhaul all existing tax laws and the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has consequently initiated the Tax Law Redrafting Project to achieve this.

     

    The taxes collected by FIRS are as follows:

     

    Companies Income Tax (CIT)

    Applicable tax law – Companies Income Tax Act. Persons subject to the Companies Income Tax:

    •All companies incorporated in Nigeria with the exception of companies engaged in petroleum operations.

    •All non-resident (foreign) companies that earn or derive income from Nigeria.

    •All organisations limited by guarantee (institutions of public character or charitable organisations) engaged in profit making activities other than the promotion of their primary objects.

    • The liquidator, receiver, or agent of liquidator or receiver of any taxable company or organisation.

    Where to pay CIT:

    • Companies incorporated in Nigeria and organisations limited by guarantee pay CIT through any of the designated banks. Once payment has been captured by the bank collecting system, an e-ticket is issued to the company. This e-ticket is proof of payment and when presented at the tax office with jurisdiction an e-receipt will be issued.

    • Non-resident companies make payment through remittance of tax deducted at source to the designated banks.

    How to pay the CIT:

    • Resident companies and organisations prepare and submit annual self-assessment tax returns as specified by FIRS accompanied by the evidence of the payment of the full amount or first instalment of the tax due. Payment is made to designated banks.

    • Non-resident companies are subject to Withholding Tax (WHT) deductions on the income they earn from Nigeria. This becomes their tax upon filing returns.

     

    Taxpayers are divided into two categories – individuals and corporations.

    • Individual taxpayers: this category of taxpayer is further sub-categorised for ease of administration into-

    •Resident individuals – taxpayers who reside in Nigeria for a period or periods amounting to 183 days or more in any 12-month period commencing in a calendar year and ending either within that same year or the following year.

    •Non-resident individuals – this category includes immigrants and any individual who is in Nigeria for some temporary purpose only and not with intent to establish residence.

    •Corporations: any company incorporated under the Companies and Allied Matters Act.

    Nigeria as a country and indeed all socially responsible and law abiding individuals, groups, organisations and corporate citizens will derive valuable benefits from imbibing a culture of tax compliance. The benefits derivable include but are not limited to:

    • Providing sustainable finance and funding for governance, public and social services and economic development.

    • Promoting civic responsibility, patriotism amongst citizens and social responsibility by corporate citizens.

    • Stimulating priority social and economic activities and sectors while discouraging less productive ones.

    • Bringing about the redistribution of wealth and bridging sharp disparities in living standards.

    • Giving taxpayers the moral and legal right to demand for (thereby engendering) a culture of accountability from governement.

    • Serving as a gauge for measuring the level, growth and health of economic units and economic activities.

    • Individuals and corporate organisations are conferred with definite benefits, rights and privileges in the system based on their tax compliance status.

    • Tax compliance enables law abiding citizens to avoid the consequences, penalties and sanctions of non-compliance.

    FIRS Tax Payment guidelines are listed below

    • Taxpayers must be registered with the tax office nearest to them and obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number.

    • Taxpayers should render appropriate tax returns.

    • Taxpayers should obtain Assessment and Demand Notices where applicable.

    • Taxpayers should remit all taxes to the approved collecting banks and obtain an electronic ticket (e-ticket).

    • Taxpayers should present the e-ticket for the issuance of FIRS receipts.

    • Taxpayers can process their Tax Clearance Certificate accordingly.

     

  • $20b oil money missing, Sanusi alleges

    $20b oil money missing, Sanusi alleges

    •NNPC: It’s not true

    Another major row over Nigeria’s cash crisis broke out yesterday.

    Missing from the Federation Account is N20 billion – up from N10.8 billion – Central Bank of Nigerian (CBN) Governor Sanusi Lamido Sanusi claimed.

    Sanusi told members of the Senate Committee on Finance at the National Assembly in Abuja that “it is established that of the $67 billion crude shipped by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) between January 2012 and July 2013, $47 billion was remitted to the Federation Account.”

    “It is now up to NNPC, given all the issues raised, to produce the proof that the $20billion unremitted either did not belong to the Federation or was legally and constitutionally spent,” the CBN boss said.

    Sanusi insisted that “there is no dispute that $20 billion out of $67 billion has not been paid into any account with the CBN.”

    Speaking on the supposed inter-agency reconciliation between the ministries of Finance and Petroleum Resources, NNPC, CBN, FIRS, Office of the Accountant General of the Federation and others, Sansui said the NNPC admitted that it lifted $67 billion worth of crude between January 2012 and July 2013. Of this amount, all agreed that the following amounts had been remitted to the Federation Account: “$14 billion as equity crude and $15 billion as payment to FIRS by International Oil Companies (IOCs).

    “They paid in crude, which was lifted by NNPC on behalf of FIRS. There was nothing in our records linking the two transactions; $2 billion Royalty payment to DPR by IOCs under similar arrangements as in (2) above and $16 billion out of the N428 billion taken as Domestic Crude Paid in Naira, not dollar,” Sanusi said.

    “The outstanding $20 billion the whereabouts of which needs to be proven by NNPC include: $12 billion out of domestic crude sales yet to be remitted. NNPC has already disclosed N180 billion as subsidy payment in the first quarter of. 2012. If PPPRA confirms this number, we will adjust the balance accordingly. As for the balance of $10.8 billion, NNPC has publicly disclosed that 80 per cent applied to petrol and kerosene subsidy.

    This explanation, Sanusi said, is “not tenable and the NNPC needs to provide the proof. The $6 billion shipped on behalf of NNPC belongs to the Federation Account and the need to investigate and audit the Strategic Alliance Agreement (SAAs) to recover amounts unconstitutionally diverted and $2 billion “third-party” financing” “we have not been given any documents explaining or proving this along with other claims around pipeline repairs, maintenance, strategic reserves etc. There was no appropriation for these expenses and NNPC also needs to substantiate them,” Sanusi said.

    Sanusi told the Committee that “a major source of revenue leakage from the system is NNPC’s unverified claims for subsidy and unilateral deduction from the Federation Account”. “If we take the PPPRA template, subsidy/litre of PMS is about 1,136litre/MT, the subsidy is around N1.5 billion. This means that for every $1 billion claimed by NNPC as subsidy deduction, the corporation is claiming to have imported at least 100 vessels of PMS.”

    In addition to the N180 billion reported in Q1:2011. NNPC had deducted N845 billion in 2011 and, according to the Farouk Lawan report, NNPC’s deduction for PMS subsidy in 2011 alone amounted to N1.7 trillion, if we add claims on Excess Crude naira account.

    Any serious investigation into these matters, Sanusi said, “will require an audit of NNPC’s database, which it is statutorily required to keep, based on subsidy guidelines. Only verification of the legitimacy of these claims can form the basis for a true reconciliation.”

    The CBN governor added that the NNPC, in paying what it calls kerosene subsidy, is confessing to a number of serious infractions. First, I have shown, based on NBS data, that Kerosene is not a subsidised product, and therefore the so-called subsidy is rent generated for the benefit of those in the kerosene business. Second, there is evidence that President Yar’Adua had issued a presidential directive eliminating this subsidy payment as from July, 2009. Third, these huge losses inflicted on the Federation Account have not been appropriated.”

    The burden of proof, Sanusi exploded, is “on NNPC to show where they obtained authorization to purchase Kerosene at N150/litre from Federation Funds and sell at about N40/litre, knowing well that this product sells in the market at N170-N220/litre. At what point was the presidential directive reversed? NPA records would suggest that NNPC imports about 4-6 vessels of kerosene a month. Industry sources place the value of each vessel at $30 million and the amount of “subsidy” per vessel at $20 million. This means, at an average of five vessels a month, the Federation Account loses $100 million every month to this racket.”

    The CBN governor then recommended that:

    •the NNPC should stop collecting 440,000bbl daily as “Domestic Crude”. The amount of crude should be reduced to the refining capacity of its refineries based on a signed refining contract that clearly states what products are to be delivered for each barrel;

    •Sale proceeds net of recognised processing costs are to go to the Federation Account;

    •All Crude for Product Swaps should be terminated and crude should be exported and sold at market price; and

    •Where NNPC needs to generate cash flow to fund PMS imports, it can “borrow” crude, on the approval of the Finance Minister, for 90 – 120 days. This crude is to be valued at the ruling market price. NNPC may sell the crude, import PMS and sell through its outlets. It should claim subsidy from PPPRA like every other marketer and present all required documents. Thereafter NNPC should pay back the full value of crude lifted to the Federation Account and retain the profit. Where NNPC delays payment, the amount outstanding should attract interest at commercial rates, until payment;

    •All the SAAs entered into by NPDC should be investigated for constitutionality. The production numbers, Opex and Capex, and profit shares should be audited. The tax arrangements entered into with these parties should be reviewed and all revenues due to the Federation collected. If possible, the SAAs should be terminated. Certainly, NNPC should be prohibited from entering into any SAAs in the future and; NNPC should account for subsidies claimed in 2010-13 by producing documentary proof of legitimacy.

    Sanusi said his submission to the committee investigating the whereabouts of the missing funds was to “protect the economy from these unsustainable losses”.

    As for what action needed to be taken on what has happened in the past, the decision on what to do in this case rests entirely with the Government, Sanusi said. His task, he said, is limited to raising the alarm over what he thinks is a development that is harmful to the economy, and establishing that the alarm was neither spurious nor baseless.

    He rounded off by insisting “that an investigation is needed to establish the extent of the losses and the nature of offence committed”.

    “The amount in 19 months may be $12 billion or $19 billion or $21 billion, we do not know at this point, but if we extend the period, the amount will increase anyway, since this has been going on for a long time. The first priority is to stop it. It is unsustainable, and it will, ultimately, if not stopped, bring the entire economy to its knees,” Sanusi said.

    The Director General of the Budget Office of the Federation, who represented the Minister of Finance, pleaded with the committee for an additional one week to allow the inter-agency reconciliation team complete its job.

    A similar request was made by the representative of the PPPRA, who said the Authority was working with figures and data on what has been imported, but he expressed hope that it might be concluded next week.

    The committee resumes its investigation on February 13.

     

  • Fed Govt urges stay  on judgment on tax appeal tribunals

    Fed Govt urges stay on judgment on tax appeal tribunals

    The Federal Government has urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to stay action on a judgment it delivered on October 30.

    The government’s action followed the court’s judgment voiding the establishment of the Tax Appeal Tribunals (TAT).

    In an application for a stay of execution, the Federal Government spoke of the “monumental economic consequences” if the judgment was executed, arguing that such could result in an economic crisis.

    The court restrained the eight TATs, established by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), from adjudicating on matters relating to tax and federal revenue.

    Justice Ademola Adeniyi ruled that the TATs were illegal, contravening Section 251 (1) (a) and (b) of the Constitution.

    The judge, among others, ordered the Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, to disband the eight tax appeal tribunals.

    The suit was initiated by a firm, TSKJ Construces Internacionals Unipessoal LDA.

    Arguing the application on Monday, Lucius Nwosu (SAN), on behalf of the FIRS, averred that the balance of convenience was in his client’s favour.

    He said: “More hardship will be done to this country, if the taxes collected previously by the TATs were repaid. State governments will have to refund money allocated to them in relation to the revenue from the TATs.”

    The lawyer also spoke of the effect on workers attached to the tribunals and those who depend on them.

    He admitted that the tribunal’s activities affected people’s rights but operated administratively and not judicially.

    Nwosu urged the court to stay the execution of its judgment, pending the determination of the appeal by the tribunal.

    But Babatunde Ogundipe (for TSKJ) said the FIRS lacked the right to seek a stay of the judgment, because it was merely a party before the tribunal and not its establishing authority.

     

  • Self-assessment

    Self-assessment

    With self-assessment a taxpayer must compute his tax liabilities, pay the tax due and file the relevant returns with evidence of payment of the tax on or before the due date.

    The relevant tax authority shall accept all tax returns submitted by the taxpayer. The tax authority shall carry out necessary checks to ensure that all required information has been appropriately entered into the tax return forms.

    Failure by a taxpayer to submit the tax returns forms on or before the due date is a breach of these regulations and the taxpayer shall be liable to pay such fines together with interest as may be prescribed in these regulations or under the relevant provisions of the applicable tax laws.

     

    Forms for filing tax returns

     

    (a) In the case of the Personal Income Tax Act and other taxes on individuals, the tax return forms shall be as prescribed by the Board of Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).

    (b) In the case of taxes on companies, the tax return forms shall be as prescribed by the Board of FIRS.

    (c) In the case of the tax return forms required under the Value Added Tax Act, the forms shall be as may be prescribed by the Board of FIRS.

    (d) In the case of all other taxes not covered by paragraphs (a) – (c) of the regulations, the tax return forms shall be authorized by the relevant tax authorities responsible for the collection of such taxes.

     

    Mode of filing returns

     

    (i) A taxpayer must file tax returns under the self- assessment regime in person or engage the services of accredited agents to file returns on his behalf.

    (ii) For an agent to carry out the services required under the regulation, the agent must be fully certified by any one of following bodies:

    •The Association of National Accountants of Nigeria

    •The Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria

    •The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria

     

    (iii) For the agent to render the services under the self-assessment regulation, the agent must have the accompanying seals of any of the bodies listed in (ii) above.

     

    Signing of forms where agent is engaged by the taxpayer

     

    Where an agent has been engaged by a taxpayer for the purpose of filing tax returns:

     

    (i) In the case of filing returns for Personal Income Tax Act, the forms must be signed by the taxpayer in person.

    (ii) In the filing of returns under the Companies Income Tax Act, the forms must be signed by a director or the company secretary.

    (iii) In either (i) or (ii), the agent shall sign alongside any of the signatories mentioned in (i) and (ii) above.

     

    Listing and delisting of agents relevant tax authority

     

    FIRS, in the exercise of its responsibilities, may:

    (i) Compile yearly a list of agents upon being satisfied that they are knowledgeable in the provisions of the applicable tax law, rules and regulations; and

    (ii) Remove from such list, in consultation with the relevant professional body, any agent who fails to satisfy the standards referred to in the regulations.

     

    Time for filing returns

    •For Personal Income Tax Act

    The due date for the filing of self- assessment returns under the Personal Income Tax Act shall be on or before March 31, yearly.

    •For Companies Income Tax Act

    The tax due for filing self-assessment returns under the Companies Income Tax Act shall be six months from the end of the accounting year;

    •For Petroleum Profits Tax Act

    Under the Petroleum Profit Tax Act, a company shall file a return of its estimated tax for an accounting period within two months after the commencement of each accounting period while instalment payment shall commence not later than the third month of the accounting period and the final return shall be filed within five months after the end of the accounting period with evidence of payment of the final instalment.

    •For Value Added Tax (VAT) Act

    Taxable persons and agents of ministries, departments and agencies of government subject to Value Added Tax (VAT) shall render a return of activities of the preceding month and remit VAT due on or before the 21st day of the month after the month of transaction with evidence of payment.

     

    Extension of time for making returns

     

    (1) For the purpose of filing income tax returns, a taxpayer may apply in writing to the Board of the FIRS for an extension of time within which to file returns provided the taxpayer:

    a. Makes the application before the due date of filing returns; and

    b. Shows good cause of its inability to comply.

    (2) The Board may in writing grant the extension of time for making returns to such time as it may consider appropriate.

     

    Conditions for granting extension of time for making returns

     

    (1) In granting any extension, the Board of the FIRS shall take the following into consideration:

    •In the case of an individual taxpayer, on the death of the taxpayer within the period of filing of the returns.

    •In the case of a company, on the death of any principal officer of the company, such as the chairman. managing director or company secretary, within the period of filing of the returns.

    •Where the company experienced a fire or natural disaster within the period of filing.

     

    (2) The company must provide verifiable evidence of the fire or natural disaster or of the death of the principal officer of the company.

     

    Consequence of late filing under the period of extension

     

    Where an extension is granted, any late filing outside the period of extension whether accompanied by payment of tax due or not shall be penalised for late filing.

     

    Approval to extend time not to alter time for payment of taxes

    Any approval granted by the Board of the FIRS shall not be construed as to alter the time within which payment of taxes shall be made under any applicable tax law provision. The filing of returns for VAT is excluded from this extension.

     

    Instalment payments of tax

     

    (1) A taxpayer may make instalment payments of tax due by commencing payment in the relevant year of assessment in a manner that the final instalment payment shall be made not later than the due date, provided that:

    (a) The taxpayer notifies the FIRS of his intention to make instalment payments.

    (b) The taxpayer files returns on or before the due date with evidence of payment of the final instalment.

    (c) The FIRS shall not approve more than three instalment payments from the due date.

    (d) The payment of VAT is excluded from instalment payments.

     

    Payment of tax due

     

    Where a tax falls due and is not paid under any enactment by any person from whom it is due, whether or not the payment of such tax is secured by a bond, the tax due shall be paid on demand by the FIRS or by delivering the demand notice in writing to his place of abode or business or through his agent, registered post or approved courier service.

     

    Administrative assessment for failure to file returns

     

    The term “administrative assessment” means an assessment raised by the Board of FIRS where a taxpayer has failed to file returns and pay taxes due on or before the due date or where there is an understatement of tax in the returns filed.

     

    Administrative assessment is not to relieve a taxpayer from obligation to file returns

     

    A determination of the tax payable through administrative assessment shall not relieve taxpayers from the obligation to file tax returns of their businesses, in the case of a company or full disclosure of income from all sources in the case of an individual.

    Administrative assessment shall include penalties and interests imposed as part of the liability due, effective from the time the returns became due.

     

    Failure to file returns after extension of time

     

    Where a taxpayer, agent or employer fails to file the tax returns for an accounting period after the time extended by the Service, the taxpayer, agent or employer shall be liable to pay prescribed penalties for late filing of returns from the due date of filing.

     

    Determination of penalties and interests

     

    The determination of penalties and interests shall be as prescribed under the relevant tax laws, rules and regulations issued by the Service from time to time.

     

    Dispute resolution/appeal procedure

    Where a taxpayer is dissatisfied with any administrative assessment levied on him under the self-assessment regime, he may seek redress as follows:

    (a) Lodge an appeal with the appropriate tax office responsible for the assessment.

    (b) If dissatisfied with the decision of the appropriate tax office, he may appeal directly to the Executive Chairman.

    (c) In the event that the assessment complained of remains unresolved, the taxpayer may appeal directly to the Tax Appeal Tribunal.

    (d) Any further appeal from the Tax Appeal Tribunal may be lodged at the Federal High Court for resolution.

    (e) Time within which to appeal or raise objection shall be as prescribed by the relevant tax law.

  • Fed Govt mulls new tax regime

    Fed Govt mulls new tax regime

    A NEW tax regime may emerge in the country before the end of the first quarter of the year.

    A source at the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) said a meeting on the tax issue would hold this month.

    The source said the meeting would set out the target to be met by the agency in line with the Federal Government’s tax projection for the year.

    “Normally, the Federal Government will give FIRS an annual revenue target in tax collection and the management will meet to discuss its action plan and set its own target. As it is now, there may be a review of current taxes.”

    In the 2014 Appropriation Bill, the Federal Government projected tax revenue of N1.83 trillion.

    It is targeting N986.3 billion from Corporate Income Tax and N845.4 billion from Value Added Tax (VAT).

     

    A breakdown of the corporate tax projection showed that N967.58 billion is expected from Companies Income Tax, N8.5 billion from Stamp Duties and N10.2 billion from Capital Gains Tax.

    The source said: “Taxes are very likely to be reviewed if FIRS is to meet or surpass the revenue projection from tax this year.”

  • Positioning the tax system in line with 21st century trend (2)

    Positioning the tax system in line with 21st century trend (2)

    The Nigerian Vision 20: 2020 falls within the 21st century and it is envisioned that by 2020, Nigeria will be one of the 20 largest economies in the world, able to consolidate its leadership role in Africa and establish itself as a significant player in the global economic and political arena. Nigeria’s tax system has to be well positioned to meet the aspirations of Vision 20: 2020 and with sustained reforms in critical areas it will get there. Other considerations have been identified as being aligned to the attainment of Nigeria’s Vision 20: 2020:

     

    Transfer pricing:

    Transfer pricing (sometimes referred to as transfer mis-pricing because of its misapplication by multinational corporations) is a veritable tool for tax planning for entities operating across multiple tax jurisdictions and entities belonging to the same group or parent. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has its own guidelines for transfer pricing and in order to align Nigeria with the 21st century trends, Nigeria, through the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has released its own transfer pricing guidelines. The regulations, which have an effective date of August 2, 2012, aim to prevent tax base erosion, ensure certainty in the treatment of related party transactions and reduce the risk of economic double taxation. The regulations can be seen as the efforts of the government to shift the over-dependence on oil revenue to non-oil tax revenue.

     

    Multiple taxation

    The concept of multiple taxation applies to the subjection of the same income to more than one tax treatment or the imposition of several taxes on the same taxpayer. In effect, tax is paid on similar taxes on the same or substantially similar tax base. Given the fact that Nigeria is a federation, there is a tendency for tax competition amongst the three tiers of government. This creates a situation of multiple taxation. In order to position the Nigerian tax system appropriately in line with the 21st century trends, there must be a conscious and sustained effort to curtail, if not completely eliminate all the nuances associated with multiple taxation at all the three tiers of government. Hence, all new tax bills from all the tiers of government, whether federal, state or local government SHOULD be harmonised and benchmarked against the dictates of the National Tax Policy by the central tax agency – the Joint Tax Board – before such bills are presented to the legislatures for debate. This will eliminate conflicts to a great extent after such laws have been passed.

     

    Curtailing tax evasion

    This is another bane to economic growth that must be eradicated or at best reduced to a manageable level. There are some forms of tax evasion which Nigeria’s and the United Kingdom’s tax laws have identified and provided sanctions against in order to prevent them. These include:

    i. Making an incorrect return by omitting or understating income;

    ii. Outright refusal or neglect to pay tax;

    iii. Omission to state income received in or brought into Nigeria from sources outside

    Nigeria;

    iv. False claims of contributions to a pension scheme etc.

    Enforcement of legal proceedings against convicted tax evaders will bring some sanity into the tax environment and enhance tax compliance. This should be done with transparency and without regard to social status. However, this will require a reform in the Nigerian legal system.

     

    Improved revenue yield

    Tax collection must be greatly enhanced and the tempo of tax collection must be maintained. Since the onset of the current tax reforms arising from the Dotun Philips Study Group report, the Nigerian tax system has actually repositioned itself with an improved revenue yield.

    The 2012 financial year closed on a high note of N5.007 trillion as total revenue collection from taxes, including Petroleum Profits Tax ( PPT), the highest cumulative tax collected in the history of the FIRS. The agency realised about N4.628 trillion in 2011. Of this figure, oil taxes accounted for N3.201 trillion, or 63.93 per cent, up from N3.070 trillion in 2011, while N1.806 trillion, or about 36.07 per cent, came from non-oil taxes.

    The performances are significantly above a projection of N3.635 trillion in the budget for all its taxes, which grew by N379.4 billion or 8.20 per cent, when compared with the 2011 all-taxes figures.

    This positive trend must be sustained in future years in order for the country to actualise the positioning of the tax system in line with the 21st century trends.

     

    Creation of simplified tax systems:

    Another way in which changes to the tax system can help economic growth is by easing the administrative burden on businesses – reducing the time which businesses need to spend dealing with tax matters and the complexity of the payment system. This suggests that governments keen to create a more business-friendly tax climate which is more supportive of economic growth need to focus not only on the overall rates and burden of taxation, but also on minimizing the time and effort which businesses need to spend complying with their tax rules and regulations. The fall out of an overly complicated tax system is tax evasion. This is why it is imperative, for instance, that all tax forms both at the federal and state levels should be reviewed and redesigned.

     

    Concise and simple tax laws:

    Tax revenues depend on government’s administrative capacity to collect taxes and taxpayers’ willingness to comply. Compliance with tax laws is important to keep the system working for all and to support the programmes and services that improve lives. Keeping the rules concise, simple and as clear as possible will be helpful to taxpayers.

     

    Review of obnoxious tax laws:

    There are still some contradictions, gaps and overlaps in some existing tax laws that require urgent amendment. The timeliness of review of tax laws as events unfold should also be addressed expeditiously so that the tax environment can respond positively to the dynamism in the global economy.

     

    Coordinated approach to tax reforms:

    There is need for the country to develop a coordinated approach to tax reforms. While many countries have improved their tax systems significantly and still continue to do so, tax reform is very high on governments’ agenda around the world. According to PricewaterhouseCoopers’ publication on ‘Paying Taxes 2012’, during 2010/2011, 33 economies made it easier to pay taxes or reduced tax rates. Introducing electronic systems to make compliance easier was the most common feature of tax reform during the period.

    Tax reforms provide the platform for creating a more business-friendly tax system. Tax rates which directly bear on business activity can be brought down by shifting the burden of tax away from wealth-generating activities to consumption activities such as personal expenditures vide VAT and other indirect taxes.

    Another way in which tax reform can help create a better climate for business, is by broadening the tax base which enables the same amount of taxation to be raised with a lower overall tax rate. The UK’s current approach to corporate tax reform is an example of this. It should also be noted that this is the position proposed by the NTP. Hence there is need to implement all the reforms proposed in the policy as earlier stated.

    In this regard, therefore, Kabir M. Mashi, the Acting Executive Chairman of FIRS had posited that a tax system that will take Nigeria to 2020 and beyond should:

    Have an effective linkage of all the revenue collection agencies with an empowered and elevated common policy making organ (JTB).

    • Be fully automated for easy information capturing and sharing, such that no transaction with some tax implication will take place without passing through the tax system.

    • Have a taxpayer data base that can be updated from time to time, and that can reveal the profile of every taxpayer.

    • Stand on the tripod of quality service delivery, effective taxpayer education and an enforcement and compliance strategy that will make tax evasion in any form very unprofitable.

    • Rely on proper self-assessment, supported by an effective compliance/enforcement machinery, transparency and accountability entrenched as part of the culture of quality service delivery.

    • Raise the level of tax morality to such a level that will make tax payment a routine patriotic obligation.

     

    The role of professionalism in positioning the tax system in the 21st Century

    The role of tax professionals in fostering a good and effective tax system cannot be over-emphasized because of the changing times which require bringing the varied professional skills and experience to the fore front of improving the tax system. Since professionals are at the vanguard of development initiatives in other parts of the world, especially in developed economies. Nigerian professionals, (chartered tax practitioners) should not only be involved but also allowed to play leading roles in any tax reform process. This is the only sure way to achieve our collective desire for a fully professionalised tax system in our country.

    The government should encourage the use of tax professionals who are members of the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria(CITN) to handle their tax matters in order to eliminate quacks in the tax system. The regulation of the tax practice and administration in any country is necessary to discourage sharp practices. This apart, the low level of tax education among the populace has made voluntary compliance quite difficult, hence, the need to consult members of a regulatory body such as the CITN for professional tax advice and guidance.

    There is the need to have professionals within the tax system to drive this all important sector of the nation’s economy. It is our belief that government policies and programmes in the area of increased revenue generation can be best implemented with a State Internal Revenue Service (SIRS) that is autonomous and managed by professionally competent chartered tax administrators in accordance with the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Unless the revenue agency is totally independent with powers to carry out its assignments without hindrance but in compliance with the dictates of the law, government shall continue to lose revenue. The political will of government shall be a morale booster for the improvement of the state’s internally generated revenue.

    Poser: The era of desktop has faded away and the era of laptops is fading away gradually. Conducting business in a physical office is going viral. Is the tax system moving along? Unless and until it is recognised that the Nigerian tax system moves as fast as the world is moving or pick up speed to meet up, it will be difficult to achieve the aim of positioning the tax system for globalisation. Tax reforms and improvement of the tax system should be left in the hands of professionals who have been trained to carry out their professional duties so that the citizenry and investors will not continue to complain of such vices as multiple taxation, inefficient and ineffective administration, obsolete tax laws, extortion, evasion and low revenue.

    A good and efficient tax system will help to achieve the following:

    • Better taxpayer enlightenment programme

    • Encourage voluntary tax compliance

    • Simpler assessment and payment procedures

    • Comprehensive and reliable database

    • Automation of tax administration processes

    • Better remuneration for tax administrators

    • Training and motivation of revenue officers

    • Accountability on the part of the collecting agencies as taxpayers have a right to demand for this

    • Fool-proof tax clearance certification

    • Mutually beneficial relationship between government and private agencies

    • Promoting government support of tax administration for enforcement of tax laws.

    The tax system is gradually coming of age and all hands must be on deck to ensure that the reforms are fully implemented.