Tag: fiscal discipline

  • Fed Govt to states: cut down on overhead, ensure fiscal discipline

    FOR states to raise their Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), they must cut down on unnecessary overhead costs and enthrone fiscal discipline, the Federal Government said yesterday.

    Finance Minister Mrs. Zainab Ahmed, who gave the counsel, said the application of such measures will enable governments at the states to properly manage the resources at their disposal.

    Mrs. Ahmed spoke at the opening of the 2018 Conference of the National Council on Finance and Economic Development (NACOFED) in Kaduna yesterday.

    Her Media and Communications’ aide Paul Ella Abechi said in a statement that the minister advised the states to “look inwards to harness various avenues to improve on their financial resources in order to meet demands in their states.”

    He said the minister was optimistic that the conference would afford the Federation Account Allocation Committee members, who are dominate the event, “a veritable forum for us to review the present Federation revenue sources, which we all agree is been monolithic”.

    The finance minister expressed the hope that participants will “be able to make actionable recommendations for sustainable improvement in the IGR and expenditure pattern. It is on record that due to persistent domestic fall in oil revenue, over the past years, it became extremely difficult, if not impossible for us to meet duly budgeted obligations.”

    She reminded members that they “need to develop cost effective strategies to increase our IGR, reduce unnecessary overhead costs, enthrone fiscal discipline and transparency so as to optimize available limited resources, while efforts are sustained to broaden our revenue base.”

    On the Federal Government’s part, she said the government will continue to account for all revenues accruing to the Federation Account in the most transparent manner and manage it efficiently to deliver on the dividends of democracy.

    She commended the wisdom behind the development of the new revenue reporting template that was engineered by her predecessor and the Commissioners of Finance. The implementation of the template, she noted, “will be one of the key reforms in revenue remittances into the Federation Account.”

    The minister urged the states to leverage on the sectors lying fallow in their states to consolidate on the financial allocation they receive from the Federation account.

    She said: “We must get back to agriculture, develop our solid minerals sector, further streamline and reinforce our tax collection systems, block all avenues for revenue leakages, continue to strengthen our borders to stem smuggling and abhor all forms of corruption.

    “We have to cultivate a new culture of efficient resource management and genuine paradigm shifts to enable us utilize the untapped resources in a more efficient manner.”

    These measures notwithstanding the mistakes of the past she said, “will rekindle our hope and embolden us to take practical steps towards unlocking the potentials in the non-oil sector in our respective states.”

    The minister had at the weekend in Lagos, said that strong capital market activities was instrumental in taking Nigeria out of recession and back to the path of positive growth.

    Mrs. Ahmed, who was represented by the Acting Director-General, Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ms. Mary Uduk, made the observation at the 22nd African Securities Exchanges Association (ASEA) Annual General Meeting and Conference in Lagos.

    She revealed that it was President Muhammadu Buhari’s decision to allocate money into the various sectors of the economy to stimulate economic growth.

    The minister noted: “Nigerian government’s deliberate effort gave support to the private sector a critical pillar in its policies, by ensuring macroeconomic stability and diversifying the economy from a focus on oil to other sectors and providing an enabling environment for the financial sector as a major catalyst in the implementation of the Nigeria’s Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP).”

  • Nigerian Army and Buratai’s Insatiable Appetite For Fiscal Discipline

    A most cardinal policy and principle of the President Muhammedu Buhari-led government right from inception is hinged on ensuring transparency and accountability in public governance. The idea was anchored on the concept of e-governance and domesticated by the Federal Ministry of Finance. All government MDAs were directed to take immediate steps in the implementation of all the nuances of this new policy.

    Nigeria’s Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Lt. Gen. Tukur Yusufu Buratai, a nationally acclaimed pacesetter, instantaneously keyed into this policy. He directed the Nigerian Army Finance Corps to initiate actions in this direction. As a new policy, it took time and resources for training of officers, whose official brief was to implement this new policy, through specialized courses, workshops and seminars.

    But while preparations by the Nigerian Army to adopt these financial reforms lasted, Gen. Buratai embarked on cleansing reforms and innovations. They were crafted to place the institution on a better stead to serve the Army and Nigerians better generally. His main focus was on transparency, accountability and probity.

    The Army Chief kick-started this gradual process a long time ago and monitored its progress closely. The actualization of electronic Nigerian Army Personnel Payroll System [e-NAPPS ] today is just part of the many fiscal policy measures and reforms Gen. Buratai’s leadership of Africa’s largest Army has groomed from the scratch under the supervision of Major Gen. J E Jakko, who has done a faultless job.

    Much earlier, the Army Chief laid the foundation, by getting the institution to initiate and adopt other reforms like domesticating the Single Treasury Account (TSA) policy and Government Integrated Financial Management Information Systems, as obtained at the federal level.

    The months of planning, training and commitment to these novel financial reforms have finally berthed with the launch of the Nigerian Army electronic payment system (e-payment) for its officers and personnel, dubbed as e-NAPS, the gateway to the Integrated Personnel payment System (IPPS).

    The public launch of e-NAPPS at the first quarterly COAS Conference 2018 in Abuja is yet another milestone in the celebration of one of the most professionalized institution in the country. Gen. Buratai has again made a bold statement as a consummate soldier, leader and administrator per excellence, who sets targets, which hardly evades him.

    The Nigerian Army’s Chief of Accounts and Budget, Major Gen. Jakko endearingly buttressed the imperative of the new system as springboard for the re-evaluation of the Nigerian Army personnel records, most of which are understandably outdated. With e-NAPPS, the officers and personnel of the Army are proud operators of a database; linked to the IPPIS of the central government.

    Gen. Jakko summed up the benefits of the new system thus: “The e-NAPPS is designed as a star topology in a centrally managed server-client model that links the data center at the headquarters of the Nigerian Army Finance Corps at Apapa, with the NA, 8 divisions, Guards Brigade, Army Headquarters Garrison, APPO and TRADOC finance offices for administration of troops’ pay and allowances”.

    e-NAPPS is undoubtedly a new dawn in the transparent and accountable management of financial operations of the NA for payroll administration, accurate periodic reviews and updates of the database to guarantee financial security. It can also secure integrity, reliability, enhanced planning for personnel and the management of contractual obligations as well as budgetary votes in consonance with the transparency in public governance of the Buhari Presidency.

    As tedious as the adoption of e-NAPPS appears, the COAS devoted his time, energy and resources to ensure it comes to fruition. This again buttressed his love for audit and fiscal policies which he sings like a song to the officers and men and even his family too not left out. His overwhelming attention to e-NAPPS sprouts from the mindset of a leader who is innately and inextricably tied to concerns of the welfare of officers and personnel.

    And it has several other pluses. Aside improving the financial literacy of personnel of the Nigerian Army Finance Corps, Gen. Buratai is one leader who believes a workman deserves his wages and promptly. It is both a Biblical and Koranic injunctions, he hates to violate under normal or avoidable circumstances. And his simple reason is that it is a silent, but potent tool in boasting the morale of troops. The e-NAPPS is a sure proof in this regard.

    Today, he has placed the Nigerian Army on the fast lane of e-transactions, and officers and personnel would now begin to enjoy or reap from his hard work and that of his team, with the removal and purging of the Army from analogue financial operations. It is a sure bet that complaints can be easily addressed and remedies provided within the shortest possible time.

    A very generous and amiable gentleman, General Buratai is a man with deep love for accountability and transparency in governance.
    It is what makes Gen. Buratai a special breed and a different leader within the contemporary context of Nigeria. Quite disappointingly, welfare of subordinates is not one of the priorities or quick-wins of many leaders in the country. But the Army boss has proven to be exceptional.

    Within Army circles, many have admitted that the e-NAPPS was a project close to Gen. Buratai’s heart and he regularly requested for briefs on progress. And when he finally succeeded by unveiling it, while addressing this year’s COAS quarterly conference in Abuja, a rapturous ovation greeted the hall.

    Soldiers were quite excited at the reality of more ease of financial transactions being witnessed, as all monetary operations would henceforth be conducted through the same procedure to consolidate Gen. Buratai’s focus on accountability and transparency. And soldiers, especially those in the battlefront, whose families depend on salaries for survival, would now have such grace extended to them much more quickly than it has ever been possible.

    Some arm-chair and bald-headed critics of the NA, under Gen. Buratai can ply their trade, after all, in democracy, freedom of expression is unimpeded. But this new Sheriff in town is leaving nothing to chance in the complete reformation of the Nigerian Army as manifest in the results of the extraordinary and far- reaching reforms and innovations.

    Those still in doubt can flash back to 2015 when President Buhari appointed Gen. Buratai as the Army boss. He instantly embarked on massive reforms across all the directorates of the Nigerian Army to ensure effectiveness and deliver to Nigerians a result-oriented safeguard . He neither spared any effort nor dreaded anyone in his avowal to reposition the entire landscape into a professionally responsive and responsible Army capable of delivering on its constitutional mandates.

    Today, the entire country is reaping the fruits of his labour and hard work either through troops performance in the battle field or corporate social responsibilities at the disposal of countless communities around Nigeria.

    It is therefore not shocking that under Gen. Buratai the institution has metamorphosed from its despicable and ignoble global status to a truly respected Army among its counterparts in the world. And the reason is not far-fetched; it is Gen. Buratai’s ingenuity and dedication to his duties in the service of the nation.

    Nigerians and the world now see, perceive and feel a pragmatic leadership of the Army, exuding honour and dignity, in conduct and actions under the current leadership. It is the secret behind the delivering of resounding, rare and irrevocable victories against Nigeria’s war on terrorism. Again, kudos to the Nigerian Army.

    Mefor, a financial expert based in the United Kingdom contributed this piece from Barking, London.

  • ‘We need fiscal discipline to revamp our economy’

    ‘We need fiscal discipline to revamp our economy’

    By virtue of his training in finance, Sanmi Akindipe, Chief Executive, Set Group, a firm that is involved in real estate and agro business, knows the importance of financial discipline not only for an individual, but for a nation. And looking into his crystal ball, Akindipe is convinced that only fiscal discipline can lead to good economy. He shares his views on the economy and other national issues with DANIEL ESSIET.

     WHAT is your economic outlook for the next two to three years?  

    The economic outlook as I see it will definitely be affected by the political situation in the next two years. Once we are able to determine where we are politically, we will be able to determine our economic future. The politics and  economy are closely intertwined. If a country is not stable politically, the economy cannot prosper, or be competitive, if it cannot stand on its own feet. If the economy is not stable, the labour market become stagnant, and it will become a burden for the government. That is why there is no alternative to a stable political situation. We need a stable political situation to deliver economic growth or even price stability. On the whole, political stability works with other measures, such as economic growth, innovation levels, unemployment and government expenditure to deliver good governance. Be that as it may, if we are able to sustain the momentum that we are pushing into the agricultural sector, we will be able to revamp the economy by 2017 or  2018. Particularly, since we are expecting increasing investments from people and firms showing interest in investing in our agricultural sector. As time goes on, we are going to see people who are going to embark on agricultural export ventures. Apart from this,  it is on record that, from the GDP of Nigeria, agriculture gives about 40 per cent, that was when we didn’t pay attention to the sector. Now  that we  are  paying attention, there are positive indications  to show the growth  prospects  fired  by  activities  across the  agricultural  sector. I believe that the combination of government reforms in agriculture will bring back much of the confidence lost.

    Since the last decade, there has been clamour for economic transformation. What in your view is the paradigm shift needed to ensure the success of current developmental pursuit?

    Right now, the naira is becoming weaker and weaker by the day. People want this currency depreciation to continue in order to discourage import and encourage export. While boosting export is important, I think the exchange rate is important for price stability and growth. Once naira recovery is weaker, the rate of unemployment is going to be higher than what has been the position before our currency was devalued. We have to consider domestic production levels by promoting monetary policy paths that will contribute to a stronger naira. There is so much concern because the interest rate for bank credit has been so high and has increased in most sectors. Our monetary policy stance should be determined by long term assessment of the real sector capacity to survive. It has to be very accommodative. This also requires pragmatic macro prudential instruments. Of late, the stock prices have not increased considerably. In their search for yield, investors have obviously discovered that equity is not the way out. Investors have lost a lot of money. The ramifications of the state of the economy are still being across with   the pressures of the austerity measures, inflation, tax increases, failed government policies and economic stimulus programmes. Many companies have been able to increase both their turnovers and profits in real terms. In fact, Nigerians are perplexed that many economists and investors in both the government and private sector have failed to foresee a crisis of a great magnitude, following the entry of the United States into the oil market. The fact that the US has come to stay in the oil market demands that the government must pursue non-oil exports and encourage more people to go into agriculture. What I think the government needs is expanding the perimeter of financial sector surveillance to ensure that the systemic risks posed by unregulated or less regulated financial sector segments are addressed. This is important now that the Central Bank of Nigeria is trying to close the gap between the official and parallel markets. The CBN needs  also to  ensure  it improve  surveillance  in terms of filling the information gaps, especially with regards to lightly regulated financial institutions and ‘off-balance sheet’ transactions, ensuring that both supervisors and investors are provided more disclosure and a higher level of regularity in information provided. We need also to resolve the political and legal impediments to the effective regulation of cross-border institutions, develop special insolvency regimes to be used for large cross-border financial firms and harmonise remedial action frameworks. The CBN and other regulatory agencies should enforce full transparency for financial statements. Nothing should be eliminated. The bank cannot do its job of assessing risk and systemic soundness if large parts of the financial markets are invisible to it. Our economic management programmes should be very pragmatic, taking into consideration both the powerful and the rich. It is so sad that we are a democracy where political leaders and private interest groups dictate our national economic policies without the interest of the common man. These groups have become so powerful that they influence elections and sponsor groups to fight for the interests in the national assembly. Our policies should not address only the concerns of a few powerful individuals and organisations, but all Nigerians.

    It appears as if the Nigerian government does not have answers to some of the current economic crises?

    I don’t think so. What we need is to discourage more debt spending because it is a receipt for bankruptcy. What I think government should do is to encourage more public and private sectors’ investments. The government has to reduce massive debt spending as well as control tax increases or currency devaluation to encourage more Nigerians to invest. We cannot experience real economic growth where the GDP recovery numbers are driven primarily by government debt-funded spending rather than by private sector productivity improvements and exports. When the government reduces spending and tries to balance the budget, we see a situation where we avoid a currency crisis. We have high debt-to-GDP ratios and these hurt the economy. As a result, there are concerns about the future growth of the economy. There is a real risk of the economy going into further crisis driven by continued deficit spending .It is worst when we use such money to fund wrong economic policies. This will result in reduced disposable income and consumer spending. All of these issues pose a real risk for another economic and currency crises. Our economy is the number one risk centre for Africa. Any setback in its recovery will affect the rest of the sub-region and the continent. The current recovery is linked to a host of challenges, including spending for the elections, poor public finances and the impact of fiscal tightening on growth, wrong tax policies and the negative consequences of violence after the elections. Right now, geopolitical conflicts, following the outcomes of the elections, are the risks to watch. There is the lingering Boko Haram problem. Apart from these ones, I think the government should focus on domestic economic development, national competitiveness, addressing higher energy costs and food inflation. We need to do everything to support exporters. Clearly, we need to have strong pre-crisis macroeconomic metrics, explore our rich natural resources and identify export-based industries which have stronger recovery prospects. We should flow with strong budgets to stimulate the economy with less debt burden.

    Let us look at the issue of power supply

    One issue that is seen as contributing to a competitive disadvantage for manufacturers and businesses is poor electricity supply. That is why energy should be channelled to infrastructural development to step up power supply. Today, energy influences production costs and is an increasingly important factor in determining our industries’ competitiveness. Just improve energy, you will resurrect a lot of dead industries and reduce unemployment. Practically, revamping the energy sector is a potential game changer likely to help manufacturers be more competitive. Right now, businesses hold a pessimistic view because of high production costs linked to poor electricity supply. The industry needs certainty as regards power supply and the government and the private sector must be prepared to address the economy’s energy needs and threats.

  • We need fiscal discipline to revamp the economy

    By virtue of his training in finance, Sanmi Akindipe, Chief Executive, Set Group, knows the importance of financial discipline not only for an inidividual, by for a nation. And looking into his crystal ball, Akindipe is convinced that only fiscal discipline can lead to good economy. He shares his views on the economy and other national issues with DANIEL ESSIET.

    What is your economic outlook for the next two to three years?

    The economic outlook as I see it will definitely be affected by the political situation in the next two years. Once we are able to determine where we are politically we will be able to determine our economic future. The politics and the economy are closely intertwined. If a country is not stable politically, the economy cannot prosper, or be competitive, if it cannot stand on its own feet. If the economy is not stable the labour market become stagnant, and it will become a burden for the government. That is why there is no alternative to a stable political situation. We need a stable political situation to deliver economic growth or even price stability. On the whole, political stability works with other measures, such as economic growth, innovation levels, unemployment and government expenditure to deliver good governance. Be that as it may, if we are able to sustain the momentum that we are pushing into the agric sector, we will be able revamp the economy by 2017or 2018. Particularly, since we are expecting increasing investments from people and firms showing interest in investing in our agric sector. As time goes on we are going to see people who are going to embark on agric export ventures. Apart from this,  it is on record that, from the GDP of Nigeria, agric gives about 40 per cent, that was when we didn’t pay attention to the sector. Now  that we  are  paying attention, there are positive indications  to show the growth  prospect  fired  by  activities  across the  agric  sector. I belief that the combination of government reforms in agric will bring back much of the confidence lost. I the government make technical preparations to alter the size, pace and composition of some of the measures taken so far. I belief,  however, that it has become necessary to further address risks of a too prolonged period of inflation and  high cost of living.

    Since the last decade, there has been clamour for economic transformation. What in your view is the paradigm shift needed to ensure the success of current developmental pursuit?

    Right now, the naira is becoming weaker and weaker by the day. People want this currency depreciation to continue in order to discourage import and encourage exports. While boosting export is important, I think the exchange rate is important for price stability and growth. Once naira recovery is weaker, the rate of unemployment is going to be higher than what has been the position before our currency was devalued. We have to consider domestic production levels by promoting monetary policy paths that will contribute to a stronger Naira. There is so much concern because the interest rate for bank credit has been so high and has increased in most sectors. Our monetary policy stance should be determined by long term assessment of the real sector capacity to survive. It has to be very accommodative. This also requires pragmatic macro prudential instruments. Of late, the stock prices have not increased considerably. In their search for yield, investors have obviously discovered that equity is not the way out. Investors have lost a lot of money. The ramifications of the state of the economy is still being across with   the pressures of the austerity measures, inflation, tax increases failed government policies and economic stimulus programmes. Many companies have been able to increase both their turnover and their profit in real terms. In fact Nigerians are perplexed that many economists and investors in both the government and the private sector have failed to foresee a crisis of a great magnitude following the entry of the United States into the oil market. The fact the US has come to stay in the oil market demands that the government pursue non oil exports and encourage more people to go into agriculture. What I think the government needs is expanding the perimeter of financial sector surveillance to ensure that the systemic risks posed by unregulated or less regulated financial sector segments are addressed. This is important now that the Central Bank of Nigeria is trying to close the gap between the official and parallel markets. The CBN needs  also to  ensure  it improve  surveillance  in terms of filling the information gaps, especially with regard to lightly regulated financial institutions and ‘off balance sheet’ transactions, ensuring that both supervisors and investors are provided more disclosure and a higher level of regularity in information provided. We need also to resolve the political and legal impediments to the effective regulation of cross-border institutions, develop special insolvency regimes to be used for large cross-border financial firms, and harmonise remedial action frameworks. The CBN and other regulatory agencies should enforce full transparency for financial statements. Nothing should be eliminated. The bank cannot do its job of assessing risk and systemic soundness if large parts of the financial markets are invisible to it. Our economic management programmes should be very pragmatic, taking into consideration both the power and the rich. It is so sad that we are a democracy where political leaders and private interest groups dictate our national economic policies without the interest of the common man on the streets. These groups have become so powerful that influence elections and sponsor groups to fight for the interests in the national assembly. Our policies should not address only the concerns of the few powerful individuals and organisations but all Nigerians.

    It appears as if the Nigerian government does not have answers to some of the current economic crisis?

    I don’t think so. What we need is to discourage more debt spending because it is a receipt for bankruptcy. What I think government should do is to encourage more public and private sector investments. The government has to reduce massive debt spending as well as control tax increases or currency devaluation to encourage more Nigeria to invest. We cannot experience real economic growth where the GDP recovery numbers are driven primarily by government debt-funded spending rather than by private sector productivity improvements and exports. When the government reduces spending and try to balance the budget, we see a situation where we avoid a currency crisis. We have high Debt-to-GDP ratios and this hurt the economy. As a result, there are concerns about the future growth of the economy. There is a real risk of the economy going into further crisis driven by continued deficit spending .It is worst when we use such monies to fund wrong economic policies. This will result in reduced disposable income and consumer spending. All of these issues pose a real risk for another economic and currency crisis. Our economy is the number one risk centre for Africa. Any setback in its recovery will affect the rest of the sub region and the continent. The current recovery is linked to a host of challenges, including spending for the elections, poor public finances, and the impact of fiscal tightening on growth, wrong tax policies and the negative consequences of violence after the elections. Right now, geopolitical conflicts following the outcome of the elections are the risks to watch. There is the lingering Boko Haram problem. Apart from these ones, I think the government should focus on domestic economic development, national competitiveness, addressing higher energy costs and food inflation. We need to do everything to support exporters. Clearly, we need to have strong pre-crisis macroeconomic metrics, explore our rich natural resources and identify export-based industries which have stronger recovery prospects. We should flow with strong budgets to stimulate the economy with less debt burden.

    Let us look at the issue of power supply

    One issue that is seen as contributing to a competitive disadvantage for manufacturers and businesses is poor electricity supply. That is why all energies should be channeled to infrastructure development to step up power supply. Today, energy influences production costs and is an increasingly important factor in determining our industries competitiveness. Just improve energy, you will resurrect a lot of dead industries and reduce unemployment. Practically, revamping the energy sector is a potential game changer likely to help manufacturers be more competitive. Right now businesses hold a pessimistic view because of high production costs linked to poor electricity supply. The industry needs certainty as regards power supply and the government and the private sector must be prepared to address the economy’s energy needs and threats.

    How is the prospect for agricultural growth?

    Nigeria has one of the best agricultural production areas in Africa. Talk about land, an abundance of water, rich soils, stable political and business environment. The prospect for agriculture is positive. Right now, it appears that agriculture has entered a bullish longer term growth phase.  Commodity prices have been good and will remain firm going forward. What the government can do to help the situation is to invest in assets, whether in the form of equipment or property. What we need is for the government to support farms to carry out primary and secondary operations differently and better. Our farmers should be provided incentives to adopt technology, mechanization, precision farming, this will go a long way towards making agriculture more efficient and more profitable. This will keep farmers on the land and ensure that farming becomes an attractive proposition. Going by present support from the government, it appears there is a resolve to build a profitable agricultural sector that will create more gainful jobs. The key to achieving this is ensuring the profitability of farming and encouraging higher productivity that can also transform the sector from a labour perspective and provide farm workers and their communities with a better living. What the government needs to do more is improve existing infrastructure such as roads, railways, ports and energy, which are essential to the food production .These will require sizable investment on upgrades and maintenance which farmers cannot afford. Farmers face infrastructure-related challenges such as high economic distances for produce which have to be transported using the least efficient transportation means. Our ports lack sufficient capacity, leading to high freight costs, delays and high port charges, which impact export competitiveness.

    Most studies have demonstrated that if governments were able to effectively spend around 20 per cent of their budgets that will probably be the minimum required to leverage agriculture to lift its populations out of poverty. Is that the way you feel about the Nigeria situation?

    So far, the situation is the agriculture sector is not uneven because of poor funding. We need to fund agriculture to support economic growth. To observers, we have seen a modest GDP growth. Worldwide, real economic recovery is measured along with a growth of employment. To achieve this we have to support the agric sector to help slow down the rate of unemployment significantly. I will advise the government to make more allocation to agriculture at least 10 percent annually. There seems to be a shift, leading to a possible increase in financing of agricultural and rural development projects. What do you think would be the impact of such a shift on the total food production volume?

    We expect first and foremost the business climate to improve with various reforms. But what the agric sector needs are energetic and inventive financial institutions with programmes targeting on the agric sector. Generally, accesses to loans are difficult across the economy for farmers. They struggle to find both short and long-term financing. The potential of agriculture and agribusiness a is immense and is a central to economic development, but only if properly and effectively harnessed.

    We need banks to support food and agribusinesses. Compared to many other countries in Africa, we   have comparative advantages in terms of land availability, soil fertility, good climatic conditions and water availability. The challenge is funding to make the sector more imperative than ever. Such investments will contribute to job creation, enhancement of food security, income generation, poverty reduction, and skills transfer. The sector is in dire need for fund access. There is a phenomenal growth in the sector and we need funding to open up more opportunities. We have so much unused cropland. Farmers and investors need the support to develop the agricultural sector and reduce unemployment. Improving funding of agriculture will help farmers meet domestic demands and this will have a significant impact on food security as well as reduce our dependence on food imports. What the government needs also to do is to encourage more farmers financially to move from subsistence to commercial farming. This way, they will be able to absorb a large percentage of the unemployed youth. In the past we use to have commodities boards. They act as buyers of last resort, guarantee in farmers that their production will be bought, thus encouraging productivity.

    Why do you think the agri-food sector is an important sector for economic and development growth?

    Taking the issue of unemployment seriously, I want to say that the sector has the potential to employ a larger percentage of the population, not only in production, but also processing, value addition, and trading due to the different needs in the respective value chains. Our food import bill is still dominated by processed foods. We need to reduce this by providing opportunities for more Nigerians to produce food.

    What is your take on small and medium enterprises?

    Small business is the life wire of a nation. Everything should be used to encourage more of it. In terms of tax holidays and easy access to raw materials, financial support and regular free international trainings. Assuming we have 50 million small businesses in Nigeria then you will discover that our economy has the capacity to kill unemployment absorb any insecurity and deliver high productivity.

    Do you think our small agro businesses are ripe for the export market?

    Yes, for instance there is no ofada rice in America in large quantity. We all know that ofada rice is healthier than the other types of rice. Now if our God showcase for instance this product to the America government and secure relevant support to export the product, this one area an average Nigeria farmer cannot handle all by himself .There is a place in Ogun State called ofada and you have all kinds of ofada rice there. Let’s do this on a large scale; we have a lot of opportunities.

    How do you view the current commercial real estate market, and where do you see it trending?

    The equity market is set to recover from all loses and give return that has never been seen before in the market.

     

     

  • ‘Executive lacks  fiscal discipline’

    ‘Executive lacks fiscal discipline’

    The Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Public Accounts, Hon. Solomon Olamilekan, spoke with Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN on  recurrent budget failure.

    The Senate Committee on Public Accounts indicted the executive in its report for mismanaging N1.5 trillion Special Accounts Funds. What is your reaction?

    I commend the efforts of the Senate committee on Public Accounts for exposing the executive financial recklessness. There were a lot of diversions. The purpose for setting up the Special Accounts is defeated. The ecological funds were not used to tackle the ecological and environmental problems threatening the existence of many communities all over the country. Instead, the executive turned the accounts into a pool for granting loans to states which were never repaid. Even more disquieting is that the executive was selective in granting the loans. A loan of N500 million was released to Edo state government in March 2003 while both Akwa Ibom and Delta states collected N34.8 billion in March 2011. A sum of N142.6 million was released to a publishing company as loan in September 2005. Foreign countries also benefitted from Federal government reckless spending of the fund s specially created to address local problems. Ghana and Sao Tome and Principe received loans from these accounts on September 22, 2004 and May7, 2007 respectively. How can a responsible government loan out funds that are tied to specific projects? There are several disbursements from the accounts that do not conform to the purpose for which the accounts were established.

    It is quite unfortunate that Nigeria finds itself in this mess. The executive is operating the accounts in secrecy. Look at the stabilisation Funds which are jointly owned by the Federal Government and the 36 states of the Federation, the presidency spends the monies without the knowledge of the state governments. Nigerians should start asking questions on how government is operating the Special Accounts. For instance, of all loans given to the state governments, not a dime was paid nor deduction from their statutory allocations was made despite the fact that the beneficiary states benefit from 13% derivation. If not for the Auditor General’s report, the Federal government has forgotten that the states have not paid.

    As a chartered accountant, how do you view government’s diversion of public funds?

    Government went outside the purview of its executive mandate and embarked on reckless spending. It is an offence that is punishable. Where a state requires loan, the presidency should forward it to the National Assembly through supplementary budget. The states would have to justify the reasons why they should be given loans.

    In fact, as I am speaking to you, nobody knows the budget the Federal government is operating. We learnt the President is implementing the original budget that he sent to the National Assembly thereby setting aside the one approve by the Assembly on which he appended his signature. It was learnt that the presidency has sent circulars to Ministries, Departments and Agencies that his budget proposal should be strictly adhered to. Now, the President has sent back the budget approved to the National Assembly complaining that certain provisions were inflated despite the fact that he has signed the budget.

    Against the decision of the National Assembly that no money should be given to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) until the presidency remove the Commission’s Director General from office for lacking experience to hold the office. SEC workers have been drawing salaries. Who pays them and from what source? The presidency must tell Nigerians how SEC has been operating with zero budget as contained in the Appropriation Law.

    What mechanism do you think the National Assembly should put in place to forestall the mismanagement of public funds by the executive?

    The Federal Government is not doing much to curb the excesses in financial wastages. The fact that government is not weird of diversionary of funds is a confirmation that it’s not adhering to fiscal policy. The cost of running government is very high. Current expenditure is about 78% compared to capital votes of 22%. If we keep operating this lopsided budget, when will dividends of democracy get to the people? What kind of development are we expecting from government that have decided to implement its own budget. Government is claiming that the rate of inflation and unemployment are coming down contrary to what is on ground. Government is celebrating that foreign reserve is increasing while common people are living in penury.

    Government is not doing much in expanding the urban development. Government should be pro-active and prudent in the management of resources. It should put in place an internal mechanism that would ensure that money released to agencies are properly utilised and ensure that budget passed by the National Assembly is implemented.