Tag: flood

  • Kogi flood victims decry N3,000 palliative

    Landlords affected by last year’s flood in Kogi State, from Ajaokuta Local Government, have described the N3,000 palliative given to them by the state government as an insult and a lack of concern for the plight of its citizenry.

    In a protest letter, signed by the leaders of the group, Pastor Zacchaeus Momorebe, Suleiman Agidi and James Oguche, a copy of which was made available to reporters at the weekend, they condemned the paltry sum.

    The statement noted that despite the over N1 billion donation, the state government claimed to have received from the Federal Government and other individuals, it couldn’t take care of the victims.

    The victims, who staged a protest to NUJ Press Centre, said: “We were subjected to rigorous exercises of registration in the camps, documentation with the Ministry of Lands to confirm the approval status of each building with town planning, yet nothing happened. We have lost all we have laboured to build. Our houses were submerged and household items destroyed. We are now destitute in our land and all the government could do for us is N3000. Is it how the government should treat it citizens?” they lamented.

    The victims lamented that, despite the huge sums of money received by the state government in trust for the victims, only such a meagre sum was considered enough compensation, saying the group was compelled “to ask the Governor, Captain Idris Wada, the rationale behind the disbursement.”

    They said President Goodluck Jonathan on his visit to the state during the flood promised to ensure that the victims were rehabilitated to start a new life, wondering why the state government gave them stipends.

    They alleged that their members at Gadumo community and Old Polytechnic quarters were paid theirs on March 28, stressing that the amount was unacceptable and laughable. The group urged the government to investigate the disbursement, saying it was heartless for the state government, which asked them to relocate to other locations, to give them N3,000.

    Reacting to the development, the Commissioner for the Environment, Abdulrahman Wuya, said the money was not compensation, but an assistance to the victims.

    According to him, the state government has other post flood plans for the people and asked them to be patient with the government, saying the money was small because of the number of people affected.

    All attempts to reach the Director of Ajaokuta Local Government Area, John Echejo, who supervised the disbursement for the council, proved abortive as he neither picked his calls nor replied a text message sent to him.

    But a member of the committee, who spoke on anonymity, claimed that they received N7 million to be distributed to the over 20 communities in Ajaokuta affected by the flood

    It would be recalled that the state government last month said that it released N15 million to Ajaokuta Council for disbursement to flood victims.

  • Flood victims reject N3,000 as compensation

    Victims of the 2012 flood disaster in Kogi have rejected the offer of N3, 000 compensation from the state government, describing the gesture as inadequate.

    Some of the victims told newsmen in Lokoja on Sunday that the N3, 000 offered to them by the government was far below the losses they suffered individually during the disaster.

    The flood, which affected nine local government areas of the state, destroyed more than 500 houses and rendered15,00 residents homeless.

    Some of the victims said that they were paid N3, 000 compensation on Thursday by a team of government officials at LGEA Primary School at Gadumo, Lokoja.

    Among the victims were  Mr  Zacheus Momorebe, Mr James Oguche, Mr Suleiman Ogidi and Mr Olaitan Ayorinde, who claimed to be landlords.

    They said that their houses located on Ganaja Road and the old polytechnic quarters were completely submerged by the flood.

    The victims said that the amount could not in any way ameliorate the losses they suffered.

    They alleged a lack of transparency in the sharing of the money given victims by the Federal Government, organisations  and individuals.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that the state government recently released N139 million to the nine affected local government areas.

    The local governments received sums ranging from N10 million to N20 million to be disbursed to victims.

    Reacting to the complaints, the state Commissioner for Environment, Alhaji Abdulrhaman Wuya, said that the money paid to the victims should not be regarded as compensation but assistance.

    He said that considering the method used to allocate the N139 million to the affected  areas and in the bid to spread the assistance, the amount each person would receive would be in the range of N3, 000.

    “ More post-flood measures that will benefit all of them are on the way. They should remain calm and bear with the government,’’ he said.

    Wuya also appealed to people living along river banks and waterways to relocate to avoid the experience of the last year during which  many lives and property were  lost. (NAN)

  • Flood victims concerned over non-disbursement of funds

    Four months after the Federal Government released N500m to cushion the effects of the destruction of their houses and farmlands, victims of 2012 flood disaster in Benue State have expressed concerns over non-disbursement of the fund.

    The Nation’s investigation revealed that over 10,000 persons were affected by last year’s flood disaster with properties and farmlands estimated at over N100 billion destroyed.

    President Goodluck Jonathan released the sum of N500m through Benue State government to cushion the effects of the disaster.

    But four months after the release, it was gathered no victim has received a dime.

    The victims, who have since returned to their submerged houses, are worried Benue government has not commenced disbursement of the funds.

    In Makurdi, most of the victims, who settled along Gyado Villa, Kucha Utebe, Agbadu, Coca cola and Tyomu on the bank of River Benue, have vowed to drag the state government to the National Assembly.

    Their spokesman, Hon Paul Asambe, said that they have been patient enough and prepared to tackle the government over the non-disbursement of the relief funds.

    Wondering what might have happened to the funds, Asambe noted the Benue State government set up a relief committee to distribute the funds, but said its activities have been shrouded in secrecy with nothing to show.

    Most victims fear the funds have been tampered with following a fire incident that gutted a block of classroom with relief items worth over N50milllion.

    Attempts to speak with Executive Secretary of State Emergency Management Agency, Mr. Adikpo Agbatse, were fruitless.

    He neither picked nor returned his calls.

  • Oyo prepares  to tackle  flood

    Oyo prepares to tackle flood

    Less than 24 hours after the Nigerian Meterolo-gical Agency (NIMET) predicted an above normal rainfall, Oyo State Governor, Senator Abiola Ajimobi, has directed redoubling of efforts by all MDAs, local government councils and the State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) to ensure the impact of the rainfall is mitigated in the state.

    Ajimobi, in a statement by his Special Adviser on Media, Dr. Festus Adedayo, ordered massive awareness campaign on radio and television throughout the state.

    The campaign, he said, is geared to educate residents on the need to avoid dumping refuse that could block drainages.

    The governor, according to the statement, also ordered all local government caretaker chairmen to embark on a massive awareness campaign on radio and television as well as one-on-one campaigns to flood-prone areas on the need to free water channels of all blockages.

    He also ordered the state ministry of health to deploy ambulances in all strategic places especially during rains for emergencies.

     

  • Flood victims seek help

    Some victims of the recent flood disaster in Etsako Central Local Government Area of Edo State have appealed for help from government and other well-meaning Nigerians.

    The flood, which occurred five months ago, left most of the victims homeless and hungry.

    Investigation revealed that most of the victims now squat with relatives and friends while some returned to live in their ruined buildings and tents.

    Some victims who spoke with newsmen appealed for assistance from government and the wealthy in the society.

    They complained that they no longer have homes of their own, adding that with the current economic hardship, “we now live from hand to mouth”.

    They said that the promises made by the both Federal and the state government were yet to be fulfilled.

    Though they admitted that they had received some relief materials from governments,individuals and corporate organisations such as food stuff, the situation, they say, was still very challenging because they lost virtually everything.

    Mr. Saliu Rufai, a community leader in Ofukpo-Ekperi said they were yet to hear from the government as regards the promise to help rebuild their houses.

    Another community leader, Mr. Joseph Oshigbele of Osomeigbe community said that government only came to take statistics of the houses destroyed by the flood.

    According to community leaders, the hardship inflicted by the flood can only be understood better by anyone who visits the community to see things for himself.

    Rufai said: “As I speak with you, most of us are just struggling to resuscitate our farmland which was destroyed.

    “We have had to travel as far as Uromi in Esan North East Local Government Area of the state to get farm inputs like cassava stems.This is part of what the government promised us and we are yet to get any of them.

    “This is planting season for yam and by May, we will be planting rice and we have not gotten any of these farm inputs from the government as promised”.

    Oshigbele said the people were worried with this development and called on the government to as a matter of urgency look into the promises made to the people. “All we have got is the team which came to evaluate our damaged houses and also the fumigation carried out immediately the flood receded.

    “Aside this, my people are expecting soft loans to enable them get fully back to their occupation, which is farming,” Oshigbele said.

  • Plateau gives grains to flood victims

    The Plateau State Emergence Management Agency (SEMA) has praised the distribution of 1,500 tonnes of grains to the 2012 flood victims in the state.

    The state Commissioner for Agriculture, Mr Steven Barko, inaugurated the lifting of the grains to various distribution centres.

    Barko represented the state Deputy Governor and Chairman of SEMA’s Governing Council Mr Ignatius Longjan.

    Longjan said the 1500 tonnes of sorghum and maize which were 30,000 bags, were donated to Plateau Government by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture to mitigate the sufferings of the victims of the flood disaster.

    ‘’We received the materials precisely on November 19, 2012 from the officials of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture led by Alhaji Bukar Tijani, the Minister of State for Agriculture.

    ‘’We would have distributed the materials before now if not for the prolonged workers strike in the state.

    ‘’The strike made it impossible for SEMA to go to the communities because of the security challenges it posed but now that it is over, we understand the victims’ plight.

    ‘’We will make sure that they get the materials without any further delay,’’ Longjan said.

    The deputy governor said the grains, which translates to 50 trucks in all, would first be taken to the three central stores for the three zones of the state before onward distribution to local government areas.

    ‘’We have a store here in Jos to take care of the northern zone; we have another one in Pankshin for the central zone while the other one is at Langtang North Local Government.

    Longjan also gave a breakdown of how the materials would be distributed.

    He said that Jos North Local Government would get four trucks or 2,400 bags, while Kanam, Langtang North, Langtang South, Quan’Pan, Shendam and Wase local governments are to get six trucks or 3,600 bags each.

    The breakdown also showed that Kanke, Mikang, Pankshin and Bokos local governments would each get two trucks amounting to 1,200 bags.

    ‘’We have a strategic reserve of six trucks amounting to 3,600 bags for isolated cases in other areas outside the local governments that were badly affected.

    ‘’We also have people whose farms were destroyed as result of the crises who needed assistance.

    ‘’We have the isolated cases in Jos South, Riyom, Barkin Ladi, Jos East, Mangu local governments and other individual victims.

    “The Deputy Governor has seriously warned against the diversion of these materials for personal use.

    “He said that anybody caught would be dealt with decisively,’’ the commissioner warned.

    Mr Alhassan Barde, SEMA Executive Secretary, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that every arrangement was completed for the distribution.

    The executive secretary gave assurance that transparency and fairness would be the watch words during the distribution exercise.

    ‘’We have the data of victims and we will make sure that all the people benefit from the government’s gesture,’’ he said.

    NAN reports that the loaded trucks immediately took off to the zonal centres. (NAN)

    PAT/MOL/MAU

     

  • Flood victims allege fraud

    Flood victims in Edo State have alleged diversion of the funds.

    They accused the relief committee of diverting funds meant for their rehabilitation.

    The victims claimed that other states had begun payment to affected persons.

    But Chairman of the State Relief Committee, Ms Maimunat Momoh, denied the allegation. She described it as mischievous and ill-conceived.

    “What we did after they left camp, we went to their communities to count the houses that were destroyed or affected by the flood.

    “If we don’t count the houses, how do we ascertain the damage and the numbers?

    “I am not to decide who gets what and how, my job is to write the report and submit to the governor who appointed me and the report is being compiled and ready for submission.”

  • Stakeholders warn against misuse of Imo flood funds

    Following an alleged diversion of materials for flood victims in Imo State, political leaders and other stakeholders have warned against further exploitation of the victims.

    The leaders, who were from the two affected local governments – Oguta and Ohaji/Egbema – alleged that over 70 per cent of the materials and funds donated to the victims were diverted.

    The member representing Ohaji/Egbema/Oguta in the House of Representatives, Gerald Irona, addressed the leaders at the home of maverick politician, Arthur Nzeribe.

    Irona warned that he would not tolerate the mismanagement of Federal Government’s intervention fund to the flood victims.

    He said: “Those who were affected by the floods were short-changed by people who were appointed to manage the materials. In each of the communities, there are recognised leaders who should have coordinated the distribution of the materials. But they were ignored by the committee, for selfish reasons.”

    The lawmaker said the Federal Government and other intervention agencies did not consult him on how the committee handled the materials and funds to the flood victims in his constituency.

    Irona added: “Even as the member representing the affected local governmet in the House of Representatives, no one has ever consulted me or sought my opinion on how best to manage the situation. But we are watching to see how the N400million will be disbursed.”

    A former Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Nze Ignatius Umunna, expressed dissatisfaction on the handling of the materials.

    He said: “There is no way 100 per cent of the materials or funds can get to the victims, given the mentality of our people. Some of them will be cornered. What we are saying is that a substantial percentage be given to the genuine victims, who the materials are meant for.”

    The stakeholders agreed to set up a committee to monitor the disbursement of the intervention funds to ensure that they are not hijacked by government officials and politicians.

     

     

     

     

  • Senator donates more materials to Jigawa flood victims

    The senator representing Jigawa North-West at the National Assembly, Danladi Sankara, yesterday donated more materials to flood victims in the state.

    The senator delivered the materials, which included 7,000 mosquito nets and 1,300 blankets, to the State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA) in Dutse, the state capital.

    The gesture, the senator said, was part of his assistance to the flood victims.

    He started donating to the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in July.

    In August, September and October, Sankara donated various materials, including cash, clothes, rice, sugar and building materials, to rehabilitate the flood victims.

    On the floor of the Senate, Sankara moved a motion on: The Menace of Floods in Nigeria.

    This prompted the Federal Government to release special funds to the affected states to rehabilitate the victims. Jigawa State got N400million from the funds.

    Also, works have reached advanced stage on the 76 water development projects initiated by the senator in the 12 local governments under Jigawa North-West Senatorial District.

    The facilities are parts of the constituency projects Sankara influenced into this year’s budget.

  • ‘We can’t assess  insurable value of flood’ 

    ‘We can’t assess insurable value of flood’ 

    Despite efforts to get Nigerians to embrace insurance and reap its numerous benefits, the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM), the sector’s regulatory body, says about 90 per cent of Nigerians do not have insurance cover. This is worrisome, says Godwin Ejembi Odah, Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Union Assurance Plc, who in this interview with UYOATTA ESHIETaddresses the issue and other challenges facing the industry. Excerpts:

    What is responsible for the lack of interest in insurance ?

    I think a lot of it has to do with lack of awareness, because you have to embrace something that you know. If you don’t know about something, it will be difficult for you to deliberately embrace it. If Nigerians are not embracing insurance to the extent that they should, I would say it is because they are not fully aware of the benefits.

    Having said that, there are some Nigerians who have unsavoury experience in the past with some providers of insurance services, and some of these Nigerians point to that fact that they did not have a good experience with past dealings with some insurance firms. There is also the fact that the economy is not doing as well and so disposable income is low, and when people want to allocate their disposable income, they allocate them in order of priority; insurance is not likely to be the first priority. So, when you put all these together, you can see why the demand for insurance is not as high as it should be.

    What is the level of acceptability of insurance?

    The penetration of insurance is better in virtually every other developed country than in Africa. And within Africa, it is still deeper in many other African countries than Nigeria. South Africa, Kenya, Egypt and others have deeper insurance penetration, relatively speaking. In many places, it is better than Nigeria.

    There are reports that poor legal framework and low perception are also responsible. How true are these?

    Image arises from experience sometimes, though there are people who despite not having any personal rely on the experiences of others. There are also misinformation and speculations about what insurance companies do, and all these will affect the industry. On legal framework, there is enough legal frameworks to encourage demand for insurance and that is why National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) came out with the Market Development and Restructuring Initiative (MDRI). This is a strategy that is built around the existing legal framework, in the sense that NAICOM wants to enforce laws that are already in our statute books, existing laws that make insurance compulsory in several situations. Motor insurance, insurance of buildings under construction, insurance of employees, and all that, so I would say that there is a reasonable legal framework within which to encourage Nigerians to take up insurance in crucial situations.

    What are the other major constraints?

    In countries where insurance has thrived successfully, there are one or two things that are in place that we do not have in Nigeria. Where credit is very low, you are bound to have problems because if you have to have money before you access anything you want to buy, if you have to pay cash in order to buy whatever you want, then when you don’t have cash, you are not able to get what you really want. That really is a problem.

    The absence of credit is a problem in Nigeria. Elsewhere, if you want to buy a house or motor vehicle or other assets, you have credit facilities granted you by the banks and the way the banks protect this credit is by ensuring that you insure the asset acquired with the credit. In Nigeria, it is very difficult to have facilities to buy a house or a car, people have to struggle to save money to buy these assets, this is why when they finish buying them, because there is no framework to force them to take insurance, as would have happened if there was credit institution that granted him the credit facility, so they don’t bother. This is a major factor; we don’t have a credit system that would have automatically ensured that assets that are purchased with this credit are insured. That is a major problem confronting insurance penetration in Nigeria.

    There is the issue of compulsory insurance. Why should people be forced to insure?

    It is like saving someone from himself. If someone is trying to commit suicide for instance, his family and friends have the responsibility to prevent such a person from committing suicide. If you want to, for instance, drive your motor vehicle anyhow you like – at the expense of other road users who could be motorists themselves or pedestrians, it is not right to allow that to happen. The idea behind compulsory insurance is to protect other individuals against the harm that you can cause them. If you have a motor vehicle for instance, the government expects you to take at least a third party insurance. The idea behind that third party insurance is to protect other road users against your recklessness. If you want to be reckless, let it be that at least you have insured a potential damage you can do to this other third party.

    There is also the law that says if you employ up to five people, you must provide them with an insurance cover against certain risks. Even though this is in the interest of both the employer and the employees, the employers often see it as they are being forced to do what is good. If they are being forced to do what is good for the sake of other people, I think it is for a good course.

    If you have a building under construction and the government says you must insure it because there is a possibility that it can collapse and kill other people, if you the builder do not see any good reason in ensuring that other people are protected and the government sees a good reason, is it a good or a bad thing? It is wrong to say people are being forced to insure; rather they are encouraged to or compelled to take insurance in the interest of other people.

    Are insurance firms doing enough to expose the business to as many Nigerians as possible?

    I think there is a lot that has been done, and a lot more can still be done under various umbrellas. Under the umbrella we belong to, that is the Nigeria Insurers Association (NIA), where all the underwriting companies belong, we regularly advertise in the newspapers. National Insurance Commission (NAICOM), being the insurance industry’s regulator, also does the same. Individual insurance companies also advertise in various media, both electronic and print. A lot of efforts have been put in, and a lot more can still be done.

    Insurance seems to be a city-based issue in Nigeria as one can hardly hear of it in the villages. What is the industry doing about this?

    Insurance should not be a city issue. It is like when you want to begin a fight you pick the easiest fight first. The cities are where you have the most literate people; it is where you have the most economic activities, so the city is where most demand for insurance is. That is why insurance companies seem to concentrate in cities. But with time, these efforts also will have to go into the hinterland because economic activities will also gradually spread into the hinterland. If you take agricultural insurance, it will be more relevant to people outside the cities. So, when agric insurance becomes more and more potent than what it is now, you will find out that people outside of the cities, farmers in the various villages will then become subject of agric insurance; so it is a matter of time, we are just at the beginning of a long and important journey and that is the journey of providing insurance for virtually everyone who is a Nigerian because every Nigerian needs some form of insurance, or the other.

    Which other factors affect insurance in Nigeria?

    Poverty certainly negatively affects insurance because you should be able to afford it to pay for the services, the premium, which is what you pay in order to be granted a cover. The level of education also affects insurance because you need to understand the contract you are going into. Our contracts today are written in English language. In other words, you have to read and understand what your rights and obligations under the contract are, you have to be literate. This should not be a barrier because there is nothing that stops us from writing our contracts in our local languages, but even to do that, you should have some indication of demand. With time these things will come to pass.

    There are complaints also of the issue of technicalities in the trade. Are these technicalities not putting off potential clients from its acceptability?

    It is a very simple thing. There is nothing too technical about insurance. Insurance is about you handing over the risk when you run to a company that specialises in handling such risks and you pay them a little amount of money called ‘premium’. When the risks crystallise, that is what you never wanted to happen, if  such ever happens, then they pay you and put you in the same position you were before you started taking that risk.

    What people complain about may be the wordings of the contract and insurance companies have started making efforts towards simplifying the wordings of the contract. Because it is a legal contract, it has some level of technicalities to it. The relationship between the insurance companies and the person being insured is a legal relationship; legal contracts are not always very simple but despite that, efforts are being made to simplify the wordings in a manner that people will now understand with ease.

    Union Assurance has held its Annual General Meeting (AGM) where an impressive result was posted. What made that result possible and what are you doing to sustain and improve on it?

    Sustained hard work and the benefits of the Enterprise Restructuring Program (ERP) that we put in place in 2009, that is the goal of the transformation programme that we courageously began in 2009.

    How is Union Assurance driving insurance penetration?

    We sell all the normal insurance products and we are also working hard to develop new products. We have five new products that are awaiting the approval of NAICOM before introducing them into the market. We are a company driven by the desire to innovate, that innovation can only show by way of new products. We sell all the products that other insurance companies sell, both on the life and non-life side, but in addition, we are developing new products based on our observation of the needs of the insuring public.

    Do you see the efforts of NAICOM, yielding the desired results?

    What you are talking about is the Market Development and Restructuring Indicatives (MDRI). It is a courageous project and also one that have a lot of potential. We may not reap all the benefits this year but there is the likelihood that things are going to work better in terms of the income, the increase in premium income in the industry.

    Nigeria recorded the worst flooding ever, where millions of people were displaced in most parts of the country, and over 140 were said to have died. What is the insurable value of the assets destroyed during the disaster, because the cost of Hurricane Sandy that happened in the United States after the flooding in Nigeria has been put at over $20 billion?

    We don’t have accurate statistics for it. It is not every policy holder that has flood policy. Right now, it is difficult to say what percentage of the affected population that has flood policy or what percentage of those that have flood policy that were affected in the flooding in Nigeria. It is statistics that need to be obtained. The American environment is driven by statistical information. That environment is different from our own and that is one of the major problems we have as a developing country.

    The government is said not to match words with action when it comes the issue of insurance premium payment. How does this affect the industry?

    The government does pay premium. It is only that it takes time. They don’t pay as at when due, but the government does pay. The government generally take time in everything; for instance, the budget that is the basis for everything does not usually become  operative  immediately because of the process that it goes through. The National Assembly has to approve budgets before they can become operational. That is why the government takes time before paying premium but it does pay. But we hope that there will be changes because we are moving towards a state of ‘no premium, no cover’. If you don’t pay premium, there will be no cover for you.

    In the capital market the insurance stocks are often referred to as the ‘penny penny stocks’ because they are at nominal value of 50 kobo except for about two  stocks. What is the cause of this pathetic situation and how can it  be rectified?

    The value of stocks is mainly driven by demand. What causes the demand for a particular stock is the potential or prospect of profitability of that stock. The day insurance companies begin to declare reasonable profits for their shareholders, other potential shareholders will begin to look at the stock and think about buying them.

    Right now, many insurance companies are struggling and that is not unusual because when an economy is struggling, it is difficult to for a component of that economy to outperform it and insurance in particular because demand for insurance in Nigeria is pretty lower and what causes how much income you get is as a result of the demand you get for your product. So, as long as the demand for insurance remain low, insurance companies will have little money to play with and with the cost of operations and other overheads, at the end of the day, you don’t have much money to declare by way of profit. The low profitability of the insurance industry is the reason insurance stocks are not attractive. The stocks will become attractive when people begin to demand to buy them and that is when they begin to become profitable.