Tag: Foreign Direct Investment

  • Okpebholo secures first FDI 10 months after inauguration

    Okpebholo secures first FDI 10 months after inauguration

    Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo, has secured the first Foreign Direct Investment of $250m for the state ten months after he was sworn-in as Governor.

    Edo State was listed as among 30 states that spent a combined N11.75 billion on international trips and trainings in the first quarter of 2025 but attracted no foreign direct investment.

    A 2024 report also showed that Edo was among 14 states that spent N21.04bn on foreign trips between 2021 and 2023 and failed to attract any form of foreign investments.

    But Governor Okpebholo secured the $250m FDI during the 2025 Edo State Global Investment Summit, which held in Glasgow, United Kingdom. 

    He signed an agreement with the European African Chamber of Commerce and Industries (EuroAfrica CCI), a coalition of chambers of commerce spanning 98 countries across Europe and Africa.

    A statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Fred Itua, said the agreement established a framework for strategic investment in Edo State, with EuroAfrica CCI committing to inject $250 million over a period of three to five years.

    The statement said that the investments would be channeled into key sectors including agriculture and agro-processing, mining and solid minerals, technical education and skills training, renewable energy, and green infrastructure.

    It said Governor Okpebholo reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to creating an enabling business environment through streamlined registration processes, transparent land administration, and where applicable, tax incentives. 

    “He emphasised that the government will uphold transparency, accountability, and strong institutional support to ensure that these investments translate into jobs, opportunities, and sustainable development for Edo people.”

    Represented by its Director General, Ambassador Kingsley Obasohan, the EuroAfrica CCI, pledged to work in line with Edo State’s and Nigeria’s local content policies to guarantee that investments directly empowered Edo citizens by building capacity, creating employment, and expanding industrial value chains.

    Itua said the partnership reaffirmed Okpebholo administration’s resolved to position Edo State as a premier destination for investment in Nigeria as well as ensuring that inclusive economic growth and human capital development remained at the heart of governance.

    “The agreement will run for an initial period of five years, with regular joint review mechanisms to monitor progress and ensure mutual accountability.”

  • Some critical issues on Foreign Direct Investment

    Some critical issues on Foreign Direct Investment

    “If people cannot trust their Government to do the job for which it exists – to protect them and promote their welfare – all else is lost” … Barrack Obama, the 44th President of the United States of America.

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been consistent that he will continue to use Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs) as the key pillars of economic development if his administration. Mr. President has also made FDI a key component of the 2024 budget driver. 

    However, unless key factors are considered and addressed, I worry that the good intentions of Mr. President will not yield the desired outcomes. 

     FDI Trends and Outlook 

     According to Statista:

    •In 2011, a peak of 8.84 billion U.S. dollars was achieved. Moreover, in 2018, a considerable drop was registered, as FDI in the country amounted to 780 million U.S. dollars.

    •Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows in Nigeria registered a decrease of around 190 million U.S. dollars in 2022, compared to a surplus of 3.31 billion U.S. dollars in the preceding year. 

     New data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) showed that FDI in the country fell by 33 percent in 2022. This is more worrisome due to the fact that the trajectory has been dwindling since 2015, as foreign direct investment (FDI) to Nigeria has plunged to $468.91 million, the lowest in at least nine years, according to official data. This has been having dire consequences on socio-economic growth.

     According to the United Nations

    •UNCTAD’s World Investment Report 2023 reveals a widening annual investment deficit that developing countries face as they work to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030.

    •Africa’s FDI fell by 45% in 2022

    •After a strong rebound in 2021, global FDI fell by 12% in 2022 to $1.3 trillion, due mainly to overlapping global crises – the war in Ukraine, high food and energy prices, and soaring public debt.

    •On a positive note, greenfield investment project announcements were up 15% in 2022, growing in most regions and sectors.   

    Read Also: Customs will meet N5.1tn 2024 revenue target, says CG

    Some points to Note

    •The lack of a purpose-driven foreign exchange management framework has further weakened investors’ confidence over the past 9 to 10 years and is one of the key de-motivations for investors. For example;  

    •Over $ 800 million of foreign airline funds are trapped in Nigeria, according to data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA). 

    •In addition, in the past 4 years major investors have left Nigeria due to the aforementioned challenges. Examples of such investors include Shoprite, one of the major oil and gas ‘companies Exxon Mobil is moving to Egypt, and recently GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and lately Procter and Gamble (P&G) announced plans to discontinue operations in Nigeria, 

    •The way forward for Nigeria, is to as a matter of priority improve and upscale our competitiveness in terms of our critical infrastructure i.e., intermodal transportation network; power; logistics and supply chain platforms i.e. the airports and the entire aviation value chain; seaports and the entire maritime value chain, land borders; products value addition and processing.  Therefore, our preparedness domestically is very critical. There should be a holistic approach in collaboration with relevant stakeholders to formulate an overarching strategy to achieve the key objectives and importantly reining in the benefits for Nigeria and consequently for Africa. To improve our trade volumes and increase incomes, we need to improve the state of our not-so-competitive manufacturing and industrial sectors that are struggling under multiple global socio-economic variables, it is a major red flag. Multiple taxation and leakages; and tax policy incoherence are other major barriers to success. 

     CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS 

    I posit that there are 6 critical success factors that should be considered thoroughly in reining in FDIs. I am not saying that they are not currently considered but I am of the view that more attention should be focused on them so that we learn from past experiences. For example,  the recent assertion the by Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development is a confirmation of the concerns and reflags that my humble self and other stakeholders have severally raised during the immediate past dispensation with regards to concession of the Nigeria Airports Concession, and the Air Nigeria imbroglio as cases of instance.

    1.     Integrity and Transparency of The Process

    The opaqueness of running FDIs and PPPs should be removed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. There should be transparency and accountability in the entire process and operations of the FDIs/PPPs so as to avoid further complications to Nigeria’s economy in addition to the burgeoning debt issues that are dealing brutal blows to our economy. Because defective FDIs/PPPs could transmute into another form of debt which will further subjugate our Country for vested interests.  Therefore, I expect the wealth of experience of President Bola Tinubu’s Strategy, Finance, Audit, Consulting, business, and track record of successful delivery of major FDIs and PPPS to come into play as he champions the FDIs as he has already been doing and most importantly in ensuring the successes and socio-economic impacts of FDIs and PPPs at national and subnational levels during this administration. 

     A robust stakeholder engagement with a transparent dashboard to show all concerned and indeed Nigerians the progress of the investments/ project on a need-to-know basis.

    2.     Investment, Business and Operational Modelling

    We need to be sure that the FDI/PPP models we are adopting are the correct models for the overall socio-economic interests of Nigeria. For example, from the snippets of what we have heard with regards to Air Nigeria as an example; you will note that issues started from the modeling of how Ethiopian Airlines was given a chunk of stake, the distorted local content value, etc. 

     The model is very important in all economic sectors because the model will determine factors like ownership structure, shareholding, Return on Investment (ROI), socio-economic benefits, etc. We should be thorough in considering and deciding which model to adopt depending on the investment portfolio and the sector, i.e. the model of the transaction, operational model, and model of the entire framework of the project; and in doing so we need to involve all the critical stakeholders to ensure that we think through the options over and above parochial interests. Therefore, going forward there should be new deal-making models to ensure responsible critical national asset management. 

    3.     Legal Framework

    I know that Mr. President has a track record of successful FDIs and PPPs at the subnational level when he was the Governor of Lagos State, but suffice it to say that at the national level, it is a different ball game because we don’t handle our FDIs/PPPs well. About two months ago, it was all over the mainstream media that one Mr. Pramod Mitta, the younger brother of the Billionaire Concessionaire that is behind the Ajaokuta Steel project, Mr. Lakshmi Mittal was able to leverage the legal loophole in the legal framework of the PPP and is able to a critical national asset access $500million to service a debt that he incurred in another country. This is a good example of How the lack of proper planning and efficient legal framework support system for our strategic and operational engagements with our foreign partners is costing us. Therefore, going forward, I advocate for the full involvement of subject matter experts and all relevant government agencies to x-ray the agreements to ensure that all the provisions in the legal framework save all the interests of Nigeria before we proceed, in essence, the outcome of the legal framework should be a win-win for Nigeria and for the investors and ensure that in the long run, Nigerians are not subjugated to foreign investors/ nations with no value to Nigerians. The situation whereby in some cases some MDAs operate in silos should no longer be acceptable in this administration.

     I hope that Mr. President will mandate the “dos” and “don’ts” of the FDIs and PPPs going forward.

    4.     Project management and Execution Quotient

    From a project management perspective, the project management framework and execution quotient of operating the FDIs/PPPs must be high with zero tolerance for laxity or slippages. This is So that the terms and conditions and deliverables of operationalizing the PPP, especially the EPCC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Commissioning) module is delivered timely and qualitatively with full value for money and impacts. This will ensure that people will not come under the guise of investing in our critical infrastructure and end up enslaving us. This will also safeguard our FDI projects and PPPs from becoming white elephant projects, an example is the Ajaokuta project that has been comatose albeit billions, if not trillions of Naira have been lost or wasted in the project to no avail. 

    5.     SECURITY

    The insecurity situation in Nigeria needs to be dealt with as a matter of priority so as to engender more confidence and trust in FDIs and domestic investments. The insecurity issue must be addressed for the productivity of the country in terms of increased crude oil throughput, agriculture, and other non-oil sectors. 

    6.     Corruption 

    Zero tolerance corruption and all forms of economic sabotage, otherwise, the FDI initiatives and the national development strategy will not be successful.

  • China, Nigeria, 33 others sign bilateral agreements

    China has signed bilateral agreement with Nigeria and 33 other countries regarding the promotion and protection of investments, the Director-General, Regional Procurement, African Development Bank (AfDB), Baba Imora Abdullahi, has said.

    Abdullahi, who stated this yesterday at the African Economic Merit Award in Abuja, said  China’s support to Africa’s development through the AfDB was being channelled through Africa Growing Together Fund (AGTF). He said as the implementation of the AGTF accelerates, AfDB would explore the possible increase of resources to the Fund, he added.

    He said currently, China is a rising player in Africa’s Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

    According to him, Chinese investment in the African continent is not new and has grown over 100 times in the last one decade.

    From $0.5billion in 2003 to $39.9billion in 2016, he said this was significant even though it was low compared to the 2016 stock in Hong Kong at $780.7billion, Cayman Islands at $104.2billion and Virgin Island at $88.8billion.

  • Fine on banks and implications on foreign direct investment

    Some Nigerian actions never cease to amaze. On Thursday, August 30, 2018, the country participated in the Africa Singapore Business Forum during which Ms. Yewande Sadiku, Executive Secretary/CEO, Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission (NIPC), made a strong case for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into the country. Participants who witnessed the Nigeria-specific investor engagement session described the presentation as smart and compelling.

    Then, while the networking session was going on, news filtered in that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) had imposed penalties on four banks and the country’s largest telecom operator for alleged infractions pertaining to money remittances. It was an enormous anti-climax for the Nigerian contingent. The news was consequently beamed worldwide while the Singaporean investors the country went to court took note.

    During the same period, British Prime Minister, Theresa May and German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, were in Nigeria to enhance trade and investment between their countries and Nigeria. Merkel came with a high profile business delegation. A debate about the consequences of the penalties on companies was then full-blown, and would have made some impressions on the visitors.

    As it were, the apex bank ordered Standard Chartered Bank, Stanbic IBTC Bank, CitiBank Nigeria and Diamond Bank to pay fines totaling N5.87 billion, while MTN Nigeria was directed to refund the sum of $8.134 billion. Standard Chartered Bank was fined N2.4 billion, Stanbic IBTC N1.8 billion, Citibank Nigeria N1.2 billion and Diamond Bank N250 million.

    CBN said the fines were imposed after painstaking investigation and its inquiry was triggered by “allegations of remittance of foreign exchange with irregular Certificates of Capital Importation (CCI)” between 2007 and 2015, in “flagrant violation of extant laws and regulations of Nigeria, including the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1995 of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Foreign Exchange Manual, 2006.” CBN Governor, Godwin Emefiele, described the alleged offences as weighty and had attracted global attention. “It is important to stress that the CBN examiners had been investigating three charges of infractions against the four banks and MTN, particularly the manner of funding the equity investment into MTN and the subsequent capital repatriation that resulted thereafter,” he stated.

    Expectedly, all the affected parties have issued statements to clarify their positions. The banks are reported to be engaging the CBN to state their sides of the story, especially as the apex bank vetted and approved the offending transactions. While virtually everyone agrees on the imperative of resolving the issues amicably, it appears that a media battle is now in full play, with the potential of inflicting more harm than good.

    Since the matter broke, the values of the shares of the affected companies have been declining, triggering apprehension among shareholders and low confidence in the local capital market. While Stanbic IBTC and Diamond Bank are quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange, MTN is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange.

    MTN, in its response, stated that it adhered to all extant laws in the payment of dividends to its shareholders between 2007 and 2015. “MTN Nigeria strongly refutes these allegations and claims. No dividends have been declared or paid by MTN Nigeria other than pursuant to CCIs issued by our bankers and with the approval of the CBN as required by law,” the company said. On its part, Stanbic IBTC Bank, reportedly stated in its official response to CBN that the conclusions reached by the regulator were based on ‘factually incorrect premises’. According to sources privy to the engagements, the Bank reminded the CBN of the outcome of its findings on the same issue following a special examination that was conducted in March this year. The finding reportedly cleared the bank of any wrongdoing as its actions were in line with extant rules and regulations.

    On the claim that the shareholders of MTN Nigeria invested the sum of $402,590,261.03 in the company from 2001 to 2006, Stanbic IBTC Bank stated as follows: “The twenty certificates of capital importation CCIs transferred to our bank by Standard Chartered Bank and which were in the above quoted sum, were re-issued from existing CCIs that had been issued by Standard Chartered Bank to the original investors in MTNN.” It added that “these CCIs were transferred to our Bank to facilitate the repatriation of the proceeds of MTN’s Private Placement which took place in February 2008.

    While the matter festers, Nigeria’s quest for economic development via FDI will, once again, occupy the back seat. Whatever are the merits of the issues, one would have expected CBN, as regulator, to be more circumspect in its reaction. The manner with which its letter to MTN and the banks was leaked to the media leaves much to be desired. It is suggestive of an unstated agenda that detracts from a steady march towards sustaining a conducive atmosphere for investment and businesses to thrive.

    Internal engagement, as the accused banks have indicated, would have been a more appropriate approach to resolve the issues, instead of delivering a guilty verdict on the matter. A simple and perhaps unarguable deduction from events so far is that CBN, by its public trial, regardless of the impact of this approach on national interest, appears uninterested in an amicable resolution of the contentious issues.

    Keen observers of the unfolding events had expected that CBN, as regulator, would have adopted a more mature and professional approach to dealing with any malfeasance in the industry.

    It is probably apt now for Nigeria, especially the current administration, to urgently retool the national regulatory template to eliminate unnecessary impediments to economic development. This is particularly fundamental if the goal of opening the economic space and attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) will not be another wild goose chase. This will go some way in supporting the incumbent government’s drive towards economic stability and consolidation.

    Some time ago, President Muhammadu Buhari had inaugurated the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC), which has the Vice-President Prof. Yemi Osibajo as Chairman and Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Dr. Okechukwu Enelamah as Vice-chairman. The purpose of this initiative is captured by the words of Enelamah during the signing of an Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (IPPA) with Singapore. “To achieve this, steps have to be taken to attract investment into Nigeria and to ensure that the investments are protected. The signing of the Nigeria-Singapore IPPA today, therefore, I hope will give you additional assurance that when you invest in Nigeria, your investments will be adequately protected.”

     

    • Ogunlade is of the Centre for the Promotion of Enterprise and Business Best Practice, Wuse 2, Abuja
  • Global foreign direct investment slips to $1.52tr

    Global flows of foreign direct investment (FDI) fell by 16 per cent in 2017, to an estimated $1.52 trillion, down from a revised $1.81 trillion in 2016, according to the latest United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Global Investment Trends Monitor. According to the report  from UNCTAD, promoting foreign direct investment for development remained challenging as global flows in 2017 fell in contrast to other macro-economic variables.

    In a statement signed by UNCTAD Secretary-General, Mukhisa Kituyi, FDI recovery from the 2008 financial crisis continued to be on a bumpy road. “While FDI in developing countries remained at a level similar to the previous year, more investment in sectors that can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals is still badly needed.  However, promoting FDI for sustainable development remains a challenge,”he said.

    He explained that the decline was tempered by an 11 per cent growth inflows to other developed economies, principally Australia, while FDI to developing economies remained stable, at an estimated $653 billion, two per cent more than the previous year.

    The statement further stated that flows rose marginally in developing Asia and Latin America and the Caribbeans, and unfortunetly remained flat in Africa.

    In reverse,  the decline of global FDI flows is in stark contrast to other macro-economic variables, such as the GDP and trade growth, which saw substantial improvements in 2017,” Director of UNCTAD’s Investment Division James Zhan, said, adding  that upward synchronisation of the trends in the year is probable, but risks are abundant.

    The UNCTAD Global Investment Trends Monitor also showed that after three years of growth, cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) declined in 2017.

    M&A growth had already slowed in 2016, and went on to contract by 23 per cent in 2017, to $666 billion. However, this still represented the third-highest level since 2007.

    However, elevated geopolitical risks and policy uncertainty could have an impact on the scale and contours of any FDI recovery in 2018.

    In addition, tax reforms in the United States (US) are likely to significantly affect investment decisions by US multinationals, with consequences for global investment patterns.

     

  • Foreign direct investment rising, says Emefiele

    Foreign direct investment rising, says Emefiele

    •Foreign reserves hit $38.2b

    Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Godwin Emefiele has said the restriction of foreign exchange access for 41 items has led to massive foreign capital inflow.

    Inaugurating Unilever Nigeria’s 10 million Euros Blueband factory in Agbara, Ogun State, yesterday, Emefiele said that global confidence in the economy was rising, with  investors finding Nigeria’s market irresistible.

    Emefiele said the economy was witnessing positive feedback from foreign investors who are seeing great potentials in it. “We are singing positive songs. We have seen growth in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), inflation has dropped while we continue to take impressive steps to strengthen the economy,” he said.

    The CBN boss also said foreign exchange reserves had climbed nearly three-year high at $38.2 billion, as more investors key into the opportunities presented by the Investors’ & Exporters Forex Window created in April. The foreign reserve rose to current position from its low of $23 billion in October 2016. He said the I&E Forex window has attracted over $10 billion investment inflows since inception.

    Emefiele described the factory as part of the feedback from foreign investors whom he had  encouraged to begin production in the country to create jobs and empower the people.

    He said Nigeria cannot continue to create jobs in other countries, and shutting down local factories, as is the case when local raw materials that should be produced locally are imported.

    The CBN boss was “very delighted” by the project. He said: “Nearly two years ago, we restricted forex access for 41 items and we were criticised. Before that time, Unilever had a factory producing Blueband Magarine which was also part of the 41 items. And the managing director and the entire management team visited me in Abuja, asking that we grant the company some forbearance and I said there was not going to be any forbearance.”

    “But they promised to re-establish that factory in Nigeria because the factory was dismantled in Nigeria and taken to another country. And he made a promise that within 12 to 18 months it will re-establish the factory in Nigeria. And based on that, we granted them some form of forbearance that made them to be able to import into Nigeria. But we were discussing. The managing director, Unilever Nigeria Plc., Yaw Nsarkoh, is a man of his word and that is why we are commissioning this factory today”, he added.

    Emefiele explained that by re-establishing the factory, the company creates direct jobs for Nigerians and also creates indirect jobs because the company buys palm oil used to produce the product from Nigerians. “By doing that, the company feeds thousands and millions of people. We do not have foreign exchange to import products that can be produced in Nigeria. When they create jobs, they save the country foreign exchange. They are doing 10,000 metric tonnes per annum and promise to raise it to 50,000 metric tonnes per annum later,” he said.

    Emefiele said:  ”The promise I have made to Unilever and other companies is that if there is any foreign investor that wants to re-establish companies that left the country, we will support them to do so. We are ready to support you because you are going to create jobs for the people. Creating jobs is not just the function of the government; private sector has to also play a major role.”

    Managing Director, Unilever Nigeria / Ghana, Yaw Nsarkoh, said Unilever is a long-term investor, adding that when other companies were leaving the country, it was busy thinking of boosting its investment.

    The factory has capacity to produce 10,000 metric tonnes of blueband magarine. There are plans to raise it to 50,000 metric tonnes. “We are building a competitive ecosystem. We want to empower Nigeria’s industrial base,” Nsarkoh said.

     

  • Group inaugurates economic team for Africa

    Group inaugurates economic team for Africa

    Africa’s Young Entrepreneurs (A.Y.E) has inaugurated an Economic Development Team as part of the effort to improve the economy of African countries.

    The team was inaugurated in order to effectively harness the windows of opportunities created by the group so as to add economic value to the African Nations by facilitating investment opportunity for global entrepreneurs and investors.

    In his remark, Summy Francis, President of Africa’s Young Entrepreneurs, observed that A.Y.E. has been waxing stronger since 2012 when it started, to be able to record the height of achievement and progress that it has so far.

    According to him, the economic development team is one of the earliest visions of the organisation when it started in 2012 and it is being realised three years after.

    He noted that the organization does not only identify brilliant minds in Africa, it also empowers these individuals in order to have significant impacts on the economy of the continent.

    “This is not only important for the sake of profit, but it will lead to the development of our continent, it will also help drive the continent into prosperity, hence the need to set up the economic development team.

    “This team is expected to work in partnership with several governments across Africa, from state governments to federal governments, for the growth of the continent.

    “Today we are inaugurating the Nigerian team who will work closely with all levels of government in Nigeria to create solutions to problems in the country.

    “Taking power supply for example, one of the attendees at Africa’s Young Entrepreneurs Empowering Nigeria (AYEEN) programme held last year, submitted a brief on power generation. The brief was so big that we could not handle it alone, but we have linked him up with an international investor.

    “He may end up providing up to 40 – 50 percent of the power supply and that is just one out of the so many solution providers that we have who can help solve problems instead of waiting on the government.

    “I am so happy that it took our generation, first to experience, to initiate and to achieve this particular movement that we see now – we are a team of people that the future generations will refer to for what we are able to do.

    “I like to remind us that it is not going to be easy to take on Nigeria being a country with over 170million people. Then it is logical for us to assume it is also 170million problems because every household has a need. If it is not power supply, it would be healthcare, or water supply or bad roads, traffic,” the President stressed.

    Similarly, the Vice President of A.Y.E., Ibada Ahmed noted that A.Y.E remains at the forefront of facilitating intra trade and bringing investments to Nigeria and Africa.

    She added that the newly inaugurated team will accelerate that investment in Nigeria for Africa.

    “With our network of more than 12million members and our presence in 19 countries, we offer a platform for the average entrepreneur to succeed. 700million of Africa’s populations are youths, that means 700million brain power and 700million man powers, our potential is unrivaled.

    “We are the only organization that allows African entrepreneurs to connect with each other financially and socially regardless of our borders. We cannot influence immigration policies of independent states, but we can influence economic policies through direction and growth.

    “We must continue to work together on ensuring every household in Africa is financially stable, community by community, region by region and Country by Country.

    “We have been given A.Y.E as a one-stop financial and social platform to accelerate viability of businesses through private entrepreneurship and innovation; you must not exclude yourself from this opportunity.

    “The future of our continent is very bright and in financial terms we see an acceleration of developing nations into developed nations,” she said.

    Expressing readiness to take on the task ahead, Chairman of the team, Olubunmi Oluwadare thanked the board of A.Y.E ‘for giving us this great opportunity to constitute an economic team for this great Organization and also to package an investment framework that will allow entrepreneurs and investors to channel their funds and their intellectual endowment for the development and the advancement of African nations.’

    According to Oluwadare, the vision is clear, the mission is well defined and the time is also ripe for its actualization.

    “Once again, I must also salute the courage and doggedness of the A.Y.E leadership for creating enabling platforms for us to thrive on this great mission of creating a new path to bring economic prosperity to Africa.

    “From the African perspective, development is a matter of realizing our potential and making the progress that we know is humanly possible because others have gotten there.

    “It is a matter of dignity and self-reliance, a matter of creating the opportunities that will empower individuals and communities and of course, it means the beginning of the end of aid,” he said.

    The chairman promised that his team will add economic values through active private-sector-driven participation and a strong entrepreneurship drive to enhance good governance in Africa.

    “In 1990, the amount of Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) received by Africa was $26 billion and Foreign Direct investment (FDI) was only about $1 billion.

    “In 2013, ODA received by Africa was $56 billion and FDI was $57 billion.  So while ODA has been growing and almost doubled since 1990, FDI which was less than 5% of ODA in 1990 has grown so quickly it has overtaken ODA. Now, ODA is easily and directly linked to development objectives.

    He quoted the World Bank, saying that Africa provides the greatest return so, Africa is moving towards becoming the engine of global economic growth.

    “Aside what African capital has been doing on the continent, over the last decade, FDI has been simply stunning. For many African countries, the largest levels of FDI are from Nigeria and South Africa rather than from outside the continent and there are a few examples of this increasing trend of Africans investing significant resources in their own countries and across the continent.

    “So when we talk about the growth of the private sector in Africa, we are talking about the growth of infrastructure, housing, financial inclusion and stability etcetera. These all add up to increased development based on economic opportunity.

    “This is a model that empowers individual African and harnesses the power of innovation, personal initiative, hard work, and collective market driven ingenuity to address previously intractable problems and change our continent forever.

    “So, I conclude by urging policy makers and the international development community to recognize and embrace entrepreneurship as a new model for the development of Africa, and beyond.

    “Finally, On behalf of my humble self and A.Y.E Economic Team, we thank the AYE leadership for the great opportunity and we are assuring you that we won’t fail in this assignment and we would put our best to create a better and prosperous Africa,” he summed.

  • Nigeria receives the largest amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Africa

    Nigeria receives the largest amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Africa

    Obiora Madu, Director-General, African Centre for Supply Chain, Lagos, spent a decade on the export desk of two major export-facilitating banks and was a member of the pioneer team that developed most of the export financing products and instruments that are generally used by most banks . In 1992, he left banking as Head, Export / Import Operations to start Multimix, the pioneer indigenous Export House in Nigeria. Mr. Export also pioneered Global Trade, Logistics and Supply Chain Education in Nigeria leading Multimix Academy to become the leading firm delivering competency based education that has empowered managers across all sectors of the Nigerian economy. Daniel Essiet sought his opinion on international trade, customs procedures, laws and regulations to improve trade facilitation, procedures for traders and government agencies involved in the import and export of goods.

    Experts are canvassing reduction in government size and expenses drastically. What solutions would you recommend?

    Governments everywhere face pressure to provide public services better, faster, and cheaper than before. Lean methods have been used by governments of various sizes across North America to successfully meet this imperative. Lean has particular promise for public-sector organizations because it doesn’t require a lengthy planning and implementation cycle, it does strive to make the best use of the talents and ideas of those who work in the process, and it focuses on the value that public services create for the citizen and how to maximize that value.

    Governments around the world want to deliver better education, better health care, better pensions, and better transportation services. They know that impatient electorates expect to see change, and fast. But the funds required to meet such expectations are enormous. The need to get value for money from governments at all levels is therefore under the spotlight as never before. But cost-cutting programs that seek savings of 1 to 3 per cent a year will not be enough and in some cases may even weaken the quality of service.

    In the past two decades beginning the 1980s, there has been a growing realization among some public servants, politicians, activists and academics around the world regarding the inherent weaknesses of government bureaucracy. From the industrial states of Europe and the United States of America to the developing and underdeveloped countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America, bureaucratic dominance is often viewed not as a solution to the problems of public administration, but the very source of these problems.

    LEAN is “a management culture that emphasizes the centrality of the ‘customer’, as well as accountability for results.” The main objective of implementing LEAN is to achieve “more transparency, more efficiency and more quality as well as reduction of expenses.”

    Mr. Madu has over 28 years of related working experience with international corporate exposure in international trade, customs and maritime as well as transport and logistics/supply chain management. His experience in training and capacity building cuts across all the industries as has been shown in activities too many to list. He has experience working with international agencies like International Trade Centre in Geneva, The US Commercial Service and USAID amongst others.

    How would you describe export outlook this year?

    The outlook for export this year is not two different from last year. Infact the press have reported some decline in revenue from non oil compared to 2012. However with the flurry of activities in the agric sector, we are likely to see a surge. The unfortunate however has been the fact that we continue to export raw agro-produce and this does not pay us. Our manufactured export is very low for obvious reasons.

    President Goodluck Jonathan in his message to a recent non oil export conference made it clear that if the country must achieve its set goal of becoming one of the top twenty largest economies of the world, Nigeria must embrace manufacturing and the non-oil sector, and that the country must develop the non-oil sector with resources from oil.

    The sustained volatility of world oil prices, the global tendency towards a diversified export based economy and the urgent need to expedite the process of economic growth and development has made it imperative that we either focus on non oil export or we regret it.

    How much interest is there from international buyers in our exports?

    In terms of agro-produce, tropical crops grow in the tropics and those who leave outside the tropics have no choice but to buy. But that notwithstanding, we have a acquired for ourselves a reputation of unseriousness particularly in respect of executing export contracts. This has adversely affected the level of interest in our export products. The result is that people that ship products from Nigeria and label them as either Ghanaian or Burkinabe products. Atypical example is in Shea butter.

    The challenges notwithstanding, what sectors of the economy stand to benefit the most from export trade?

    When you mention export every body’s mind go to the traditional agric produce but indeed so many sectors in the country are exporting without knowing it. However let me talk about the not too popular export of services.

    Trade in Services refers to the sale and delivery of an intangible product, called a service, between a producer and consumer. Trade in services takes place between a producer and consumer that are, in legal terms, based in different countries, or economies, this is called International Trade in Services.

    The International Trade Centre in Geneva has said that by 2050 80 per cent of workers around the globe will be working in that service sector and also that services now account for approximately two-thirds of the world’s economic activity, with trade in services contributing over 20 per cent of world trade and over US$1.3 trillion annually. Currently over half of the world’s workforce is employed by service firms, which also create most of the new jobs. The contribution of services to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the majority of countries is well over 50 per cent and in some cases, as high as 70 per cent. Furthermore, new information and communications technologies are increasing the tradability of services. Trade in services is expected to represent half of all world trade by 2020.

    A country survey of the services sector in Nigeria, I conducted for ITC in 2006 revealed that 42 per cent of Nigeria’s trade performance is traceable to the services sector. Identified sub-sectoral activities with high export potentials include engineering, telecommunications, healthcare, catering, tourism, architecture, accountancy, courier, business and management consultancy, etc. Emerging markets was also identified in business advocacy both at the public and private sector levels. It is doubtful, however, if the nation is aware of the potentials of this sub-sector and its ability to contribute immensely to the country’s economic diversification agenda. Nigeria’s tourism industry, for instance, is a big gold mine that is yet to be excavated, the same goes for our film industry with our home videos making waves in homes around the world and yet no coordinated approach to ensuring its official exports.

    What are the biggest challenges to export market development?

    The challenges are mainly policy failures. This is why at our export has not progressed in spite of the interest shown by government.There are other challenges within the sector. These include absence of relevant support structure. This issue is vital.The export sector is a very large one and needs so many hands on deck in the chain. This means that if any section is not working, others will be affected. It shouldn’t be only the concern of Ministry of Trade and Investment. You notice that that inadequate attention is paid to the small and medium scale enterprises in our export policies. As a strategy global, SMEs are supported because they offer considerable potential for exports. However, in spite of a deliberate policy of providing support to SMEs adopted by many countries, this potential is yet to be fully exploited. This assertion was made by the International Trade Centre in Geneva. It went ahead to say that in many developing countries there seems to be insufficient awareness of the part that can be played by export development companies toward coordinating the SMEs and channeling their exports. This observation is as relevant today as ever, particularly in Nigeria. A close study of our export sector shows clearly that we have never considered the issue of training in international trade important. Perhaps because our importers open Letters of Credits and receive their goods and our exporters seem to be “doing something”, we erroneously jump to the conclusion that we do not need training. Nothing could be farther from the reality. All countries that are serious with export, place a lot of emphasis on training because the quality of a nation’s export output is a reflection of the quality of her manpower. If we can possibly quantify the losses incurred and the image problem created by lack of training in this sector, then we will appreciate the importance of the need to quickly address this situation.

    Do you send any export potential in our film industry?

    It is doubtful, however, if the nation is aware of the potentials of this sub-sector and its ability to contribute immensely to the country’s economic diversification agenda. Nigeria’s tourism industry, for instance, is a big gold mine that is yet to be excavated, the same goes for our film industry with our home videos making waves in homes around the world and yet no coordinated approach to ensuring its official exports.

    In the face of current unfavorable developments in the international oil market which is likely to be with us for some time to come, Nigeria must seek alternative exports or face the unhappy consequences of constantly reduced foreign exchange earnings.

    The export industry is an exceptionally dynamic sector. Consequently, it requires a system of proactive and future-oriented strategic policies and measures which will have to be constantly reviewed, adapted and improved to ensure its effectiveness.

    What is the precondition for effective export promotion?

    Exporting is an important factor of economic growth, and therefore export promotion is a critical consideration for economic development of each country. As a public policy component government-sponsored programs must be developed to promote export activities. Promoting export activity; particularly by traditional exports and new export products, is essential for progress in this area. Currently the government is the principal provider of export assistance to the business community but government alone does not have all the resources, the staff, the expertise, or the communication channels needed to wage such a broad-based promotional campaign and for this reason the government needs to develop broader and deeper partnerships with the private sector. Export promotion is a high economic priority for virtually every country. While facilitating the expansion of existing export product lines is an obvious concentration area, it is in the promotion of new export products, and the exploitation of new markets that can provide special help to home enterprises. For developing countries, external markets pose several kinds of problems. First, home exporters do not know the basic environment in foreign states, and do not have the capacity to invest in exploration, much less pay consultants to advise them on entry strategies. Associations of exporters at home confront a like problem, though on paper they should be able to carry out market surveys and the like. Secondly, foreign regulations on safety and environmental standards, and other norms laid down by potential markets are little understood by home exporters, and pose real nontariff barriers (NTBs) to entry. Also home exporters lack credibility with potential foreign customers, and this becomes a chicken-and-egg syndrome, making it difficult to break this cycle of unfamiliarity.

    Overall, the economy has managed to navigate the financial crisis relatively well. We expect economic growth to accelerate. However, as the economy recovers, we face different challenges which were at the centre of the crisis. In terms of manufacturing activity, the immediate outlook looks to be slowing somewhat. What is your take? An economy with consumption mentality will face the challenges we currently face. The real sector is not working? Where are the manufacturing companies? Are small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) growing or dying? If any economy is not growing forget about the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and look at the reality on ground. Who will employ the army of half baked graduates that you churn out yearly? As we speak, the few companies that are still afloat are groaning under terrible conditions that affect their competitiveness-ranging from infrastructure, to human capital challenges occasioned by the half baked graduates coming out of our tertiary institutions. As we speak, the universities have been shut down for three months and as soon as they resume by the grace of God, examination will be administered. What do you expect from such a system? We must address both the hard and soft infrastructure to help our industries to survive.

    Will oil continue to be the key export, or are you expecting other sectors to play an increasingly important role?

    From available statistics, only few countries of the world can match Nigeria’s endowment in the area of natural resources. With an estimated population of over 140 million people, and onshore and offshore that boast of some of the finest deposits of oil and natural gas, a rainforest belt that offers the best cash crops and hard wood and a savannah region with very large tones of oil seeds, coffee, chilies, spices and abundant solid mineral resources. In fact, the opportunity that Nigeria offers investors in the field of non oil export is immense and irresistible. In spite of all these, the economy has remained largely monolithic with investment in non oil export sector being everything but strategic. There is no gain saying that any policy or strategy aimed at achieving the nation’s Vision 2020 should therefore integrate the development of the non oil export sector, if we are going to achieve economic recovery. We need a purposeful and well-articulated non-oil export development policy to form part of our general development plan to achieve such a goal.

    What kind of collaborative export promotion strategy, do you think would allow companies to overcome the various barriers and obstacles involved in exporting and to successfully position Nigeria in international markets?

    Obtaining access to export markets is crucial for fostering SME growth and productivity, especially in light of increased globalization and market liberalisation. SME in developing countries, however, face many constraints to competing effectively in these markets since they often lack the necessary knowledge and financing, may not meet foreign regulatory requirements, or may produce products in quantities and of a quality that are not adequate for foreign buyers.

    One effective way of addressing these problems is through the development of export consortia. Export consortia or Cooperative Exporting are voluntary groupings of enterprises, usually in the same or similar business or sub-sector, with the objective of improving the export readiness and increasing the export volumes of the participants. By combining their knowledge, financial resources and contacts within an export consortium, SME can significantly improve their export potential and reduce the costs and risks involved in penetrating foreign markets.

    Most consortia are non-profit entities, and members retain their financial, legal, managerial, and commercial autonomy. So, despite their participation in the export consortia, member firms do not give up any control over their business to others. This is the main difference between consortia and other types of strategic alliances.

    This offers firms the opportunity to reduce costs by capturing economies of scale. Joint ventures also enable participating firms to spread risks. These benefits are likely to be greatest for small and medium-sized firms that are either new to exporting or have limited export experience. However, firms of all sizes and levels of international business experience can use joint exporting to reduce per unit export costs and develop proactive export strategies that may not be feasible for individual exporters. The ability to reduce export costs and risks is especially important when considering entry into a new or complex export market

    It is wise to consider collective exporting and its advantages. The western markets are very complicated to export to but joining forces with compatriots may put exporters in a better position to succeed. ITC described the international market as ruthless, selective and fiercely competitive. This underscores the need to explore all options capable of reducing inherent risk.

    In an economic environment characterised by constantly changing technology and market trends, how do SME export companies cope?

    Access to finance had been singled out as one of the major challenge impeding the survival and growth of SMEs in Africa. Significantly low figures of SMEs who apply for financing succeed in getting financing. The ability of SMEs to grow depends highly on their potential to invest in restructuring and innovation. All these investments require capital and therefore access to finance. Against this background, the consistently repeated conception of SMEs about their problems regarding access to finance is a priority area of concern.

    Lack of adequate credit for SMEs traceable to the reluctance of banks to extend credit to them owing among others to poor documentation of project proposals as well as inadequate collateral by SME operators. Developmental policies weigh in favour of large firms and sometimes foreign owned firms leaving SMEs in a distressed and vulnerable position.

    The problem of access to information may be attributed to the inadequacy of SME support institutions. This point to the need for a supportive policy to encourage the establishment of documentation centers and information networks to provide information to SMEs at an affordable price.

    Federal Direct Investment is dwindling. Looking at the macroeconomic situation, is Nigeria not stable enough for foreign direct investment by multinational corporations?

    Nigeria receives the largest amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Africa. Foreign Direct Investment inflows have been growing enormously over the course of the last decade: from $1.14 billion in 2001 and $2.1 billion in 2004, Nigeria’s FDI reached $11 billion in 2009 according to UNCTAD, making the country the nineteenth greatest recipient of FDI in the world.

    Nigeria’s most important sources of FDI have traditionally been the home countries of the oil majors. The USA, present in Nigeria’s oil sector through Chevron Texaco and Exxon Mobil, had investment stock of $3.4 billion in Nigeria in 2008, the latest figures available. The UK, one of the host countries of Shell, is another key FDI partner – UK FDI into Nigeria accounts for about 20 per cent of Nigeria’s total foreign investment. As China seeks to expand its trade relationships with Africa, it too is becoming one of Nigeria’s most important sources of FDI; Nigeria is China’s second largest trading partner in Africa, next to South Africa. From $3 billion in 2003, China’s direct investment in Nigeria is reported to be now worth around $6 billion. The oil and gas sector receives 75 per cent of China’s FDI in Nigeria. Other significant sources of FDI include Italy, Brazil, the Netherlands, France and South Africa.

    What is the most cost effective and quickest method to stimulate the economy and support job creation?

    Successful employment creation hinges on a triple E ie Education, Employability and Economy. That means that we must strategically deal with the three issues before we can achieve a substantial success in our employment generation effort. What is the quality of our education? Who is to blame for the quality? If you train soldiers for previous wars can they fight the present wars not to talk about the future wars? The answers to above questions will address the first two Es. In respect of the economy,

    Is the real sector working? Where are the manufacturing companies? Are SMEs growing or dying? If any economy is not growing forget about the GDP and look at the reality on ground that will employ the army of half baked graduates that you churn out yearly. As we speak the universities have been shut down for three months and as soon as they resume by the grace of God examination will be administered and what do you expect from such a system. We must do something about our education system to improve the employability of our graduates. Also the SMEs hold the ace if there is a deliberate effort to help them grow.

    Some ago when the present minister of Trade and Investment was in Finance three sectors that have the capacity to generate the largest number of employment and they were Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), Construction and Entertainment. It was unveiled and some meetings held but as soon as he left, nothing was heard of that again. The South African government identified BPO and Tourism as their target for economic growth and employment generation and I you fly into South Africa, from the airport everything speaks to you about these two sectors. This policy saumasult and they need to always change what the predecessor started will lead us nowhere. We need to get strategic and show seriousness from the top and pursue our dream to a logical conclusion. Grow the SMEs if you wish to grow the economy. Show consistency in policy implementation. As much as we do not want quick fixes, let us go for low hanging apples that will give us good results in the short run. Declare a state of emergency in our education sector and overhaul the education system to address current and future challenges.

    What services does your organisation provide to help firms become successful in foreign markets?

    Multimix Academy is an integrated supply chain solutions and intervention company that provides exceptional high quality International Business and Logistics education and intervention. We provide Logistics and Supply Chain Management consultancy services, Marketing Strategy Development, Professional education in Logistics and International Business Management, Import/Export and customs compliance Consultancy, Business Process Re-Engineering, Business Support Outsourcing and Customised training services.

    Our consultancy interventions will deliver amongst others: reduction in the logistics process chain, reduction in cost, enhancement in the operation system integrity, Improve staff productivity levels, Improve margins and profitability of your logistics operations and creation of additional value in the overall logistics chain.

    The key objective of our training programmes is to provide excellent programmes essential to anyone in pursuit of world class performance in logistics and supply chain management

    Multimix Export House on the other hand is Nigeria’s pioneer and leading Export Management Company. Our Services are a strategic link in the export process for companies of all sizes and degrees of export experience. Our Export Management Service is especially crucial to companies wishing to penetrate new markets or expand their current exporting business but lacking the expertise, physical facilities or other resources needed for such an international undertaking.

    We provide Export consultancy services for both buyers and sellers in the global supply chain. We are also traders of products ourselves using our knowledge and experience as an Export Management Company to help your business gain entry into new markets across the globe. Our solutions add real value and support international growth and sales. On the procurement side, we can provide professional representation for your company, helping source and procure new products and services.

    What are the requirements for exporters to avail of these services?

    Our Export Management Services are a strategic link in the export supply chain for companies of all sizes and degrees of export experience. Especially crucial to companies wishing to penetrate new markets or expands their current exporting business but lacking the expertise, physical facilities or other resources needed for such an international undertaking. Exporters can contact us right from the beginning of their transaction for handholding till the end of the transaction

    We act as the export management company for its client firms, assuming most of the technical export responsibilities. Our various services include: conducting market research to determine the best foreign markets for your products; attending trade shows and promoting your products overseas; assessing proper distribution channels; coating foreign representatives and/or distributors; arranging export financing; handling export logistics, such as preparing invoices, arranging insurance, customs documentation, etc.; and advising on the legal aspects of exporting and other compliance matters dealing with domestic and foreign trade regulations. Attend trade shows and travel abroad, meeting potential customers face to face. Continuously research and appraise market conditions overseas, providing feedback to our business partners for incorporation in their marketing and product development plans

    What do you consider as the major accomplishments of the export promotion council?

    The export promotion council has tried within available resources and have assisted in developing various products and organised various trade fairs and solo exhibitions. Through the Export Mentorship Programme which I manage for NEPC several new exporters have emerged coached by their mentors.

    What advice would you give the policy makers to help the economy and exporters?

    It is imperative that SME policies have an export orientation at the point of conception. This would culminate in the entrenchment of a wide-spread export culture in the country. Experiences of industrialised countries have proven that small and medium scale enterprises are the pivot of exports as they account for at least 60 per cent of export activities. With SMEs in the centre of exports repatriation of proceeds is monitored and guaranteed. It is recognition of this type of advantage that UNIDO has supported the Federal Ministry of Commerce in establishing and organizing the Aba leather products-cluster. This strategy should be extended to other products. Nigeria is no doubt one of the most promising countries in Africa and its potential as a net exporter of agro industrial products, manufactures and services has never been in doubt and will continue to attract high interest from the international business community.

    Result from the two major interactive stakeholders fora organised successfully by the Federal Ministries of Commerce and Finance has indicated the preparedness of the Nigerian private sector to accept the challenge of driving the nation’s economy. This acceptance is however, predicated on the ability of government to provide the proverbial enabling environment. It is, therefore, in recognition of this that recommended solutions need to be vigorously pursued via the vehicles of the attached specific projects. In doing this also government must accept and act on the fact that a lot of financial investments must go into the creation of the necessary support structures towards making trade the hub of the nation’s economic development and growth. Nigeria is no doubt one of the most promising countries in Africa and its potential as a net exporter of agro industrial products, manufactures and services has never been in doubt and will continue to attract high interest from the international business community.