Tag: former Chairman

  • Mainagate: Nothing will be swept under carpet, says Senate panel

    Mainagate: Nothing will be swept under carpet, says Senate panel

    The Senate ad-hoc panel investigating the surreptitious reappearance of former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reform, Abdulrasheed Maina, Thursday vowed not to sweep anything under the carpet in its quest to expose how Maina re-emerged.

    The committee also said that its report would be submitted to the Senate in plenary for consideration in December.

    Chairman of the panel, Senator Emmanuel Paulker, stated this while briefing reporters after closed door session with the Attorney General of the federation and Minister of Justice,  Abubakar Malami.

    The meeting was held in his office apparently to keep praying eyes away from the discussion of the panel.

    Senator Paulker said that the committee resolved to conduct the investigation behind closed door because the committee wanted to do through probe of the issue assigned to it.

    The Bayelsa Central lawmaker said that the investigative hearing was shifted to his office on account of his personal discretion.

    He said, “It is at my discretion to hold the meeting my office.  All the four chairmen of the committee were present.  We don’t want a situation whereby media report will dictate section of our report.  The closed door session will allow us to do thorough investigation on the matter.”

    Paulker added, “Nothing will be swept under the carpet, the truth of matter will come out at the end of our investigation and the report will be submitted before Christmas.”

    The meeting yesterday will be the second time this week that Malami will appear before the panel.

    It is also expected that the AGF will appear before the committee next week.

    When the AGF appeared the committee on Tuesday, The Nation exclusively reported that Malami admitted that he met with Maina in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE) last year.

  • How Oronsaye, Maina diverted pension funds, by EFCC

    How Oronsaye, Maina diverted pension funds, by EFCC

    A Federal High Court in Abuja heard Tuesday how huge sums belonging to pensioners were allegedly diverted by former Head of Service of the Federation (HOSF), Stephen Oronsaye and former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms, Abdulrasheed  Maina through phoney contracts.

    An operative of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Rouqayya Ibrahim said pension funds were allegedly diverted by the duo through various companies.

    Rouqayya spoke Tuesday while testifying as a prosecution witness in the trial of Orosaye, the Managing Director of Fredrick Hamilton Global Services Limited, Osarenkhoe Afe and the company on a 24-count charge bordering on stealing and obtaining money by false pretence.

    They are alleged to have been involved in several contract awards during Oronsaye’s tenure as HOS.

    The prosecution alleged the fraud, involving about N2 billion, was allegedly perpetrated using firms like Cluster Logistic Limited, Kongolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, Drew Investment and Construction Company Limited, and Xangee Technologies Limited.

    Led in evidence by lead prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), Rouqayya said in the course of investigations, the EFCC requested for payment mandate from the office of the Head of Service (HOS).

    She said: “We analysed the mandate, obtained necessary information like bank account numbers, and then requested for the account statements from the banks,” she said.

    She stated that the analysis revealed a company, Xangee Technologies Limited, which she noted, was already being tried before Justice Abubakar Talba of the High Court of thr Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Gudu, for alleged pension fraud.

    The witness said: “We discovered that the company received payment of more than N183 million for biometric enrolment, but there was no biometric contract executed by the company, instead the money was withdrawn cash, converted to US dollars and handed over to Abdulrasheed Maina, through his brother, Khalid Biu,”

    She added that three other companies – Mofshad Ventures, Mofshad Limited and Kombosko Nigeria Limited, received more than N400 million for non-existent contracts.

    The witness said: “We discovered that the three companies were associated with one Emmanuel Olanipekun, who is also currently standing trial, and one Chidi, also standing trial, and the monies were withdrawn in cash with part of it given to Mr. Oronsaye.”

    She said investigation of the pension account in Union Bank showed that there was a letter, instructing that the money be transferred to another pension account.

    “We saw another letter on it, on which there was a minute and instruction from Mr. Oronsaye, to transfer about N113 million to a Unity Bank account belonging to the State House, which we discovered he was the sole-signatory.

    “As at the time the transfer was made in 2010, Mr. Oronsaye had ceased to be the Principal Secretary in the State House and had become the Head of Service. We discovered that the monies were withdrawn through cheques, but all efforts to get the person to whom they were issued to, was unsuccessful, and Mr. Oronsaye could not explain the reason for the disbursement,” the witness said.

    Rouqayya further investigation of such suspicious transfers led investigators to discover six accounts in Fidelity Bank in the name of Faizal Abdullahi, Mafisa Abdullahi, Kongolo Dynamic Cleaning Limited, Drew Investment and Construction Company Limited, and Cluster Logistic Limited.

    She said: “There was also another account in the name of Abdulrasheed Maina, and his brother, Biu, a staff of the bank, who opened the accounts and was the accounts officer.” She added that  after Biu resigned from the bank, Toyin Meseke, a staff of the bank took over as the account officer.

    The witness said: “We invited him for an interview and discovered that all the accounts were operated by Abdulrasheed Maina, even though his name, picture and signature were not anywhere in the opening account packages.”

    She said Maina operated the account mainly through text messages and emails, as “instructions regarding payment or withdrawal were sent to Meseke by text or email”.

    Rouqayya said forensic analysis of Meseke’s phone was carried out, which revealed how funds were fraudulently diverted from the account. She added: “The account officer will, after receiving instruction from Maina, convert the money to US dollars and deliver same to him in Dubai.”

    According to her, Maina, a former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms remained at large.  She said Maina never showed up in the course of investigations, and deserted his known residence.

    The witness, who said investigations showed that Maina paid cash of $2 million to buy a house in Jabi, told the court that apart from the Interpol notice issued for Maina’s arrest, “we are still doing all we can, but yet to get hold of him.”

    Earlier, Jacobs tendered three statements made to EFCC’s investigators by Oronsaye, during the course of investigations. The statements were identified by Ibrahim and were admitted in evidence by the court when defence lawyers, Joe Agi (for Oronsaye) and Oluwole Aladedoye (for Afe and his company) failed to object.

    In reaction to complaint by Aladedoye that the EFCC was sponsoring media publications meant to prejudice the trial, the trial judge, Justice Gabriel Kolawole warned the EFCC to desist from such practice.

    The judge said he read some of the publications handed to the court by Aladedoye and found that the information were ascribed to the EFCC. He said that was the second time such incident would happen in the cases being prosecuted in his court by the EFCC.

    The judge warned that should such occur the third time, he would not hesitate to hands off the case and return the file to the court’s Chief judge to allow the EFCC try its cases and secure conviction through the media.

    Justice Kolawole said it was wrong for the EFCC to release documents, in relation to a case pending in court, to the media, even when such documents were yet to be tendered in court.

    He said he was not against the media covering court’s proceedings, but was not comfortable where publications are made to prejudice pending proceedings.

    Justice Kolawole adjourned to December 5, 2017 for continuation of the judicial trial.

     

  • Maina: Senate grills AGF in secret

    Maina: Senate grills AGF in secret

    Attorney General of the Federation(AGF) and Minister of Justice, Mallam Abubakar Malami, Tuesday appeared before Senate ad hoc Committee investigating re-appearance, reinstatement and promotion of former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reform, Abdulrasheed Maina.

    Malami who was invited to explain his role in the controversial re-appearance and reinstatement of Maina as a director in the ministry of Interior, was questioned by members of the committee in camera.

    Anxious reporters who attempted to cover the investigative hearing were asked to leave the venue as the probe was not open for coverage.

    The sensitivity of the issues surrounding Maina’s surreptitious return might have informed the decision of the committee to hold its meeting in secret.

    The AGF was scheduled to appear before the committee on November 8 but he sought permission of the committee to appear Tuesday.

    Chairman of the Committee, Senator Emmanuel Paulker (Bayelsa Central) who asked reporters to leave after brief opening remarks, commended the AGF for appearing before the committee to make presentation on his alleged involvement in the return and reinstatement of Maina.

    Paulker explained that the committee was mandated by the Senate to carry out the investigation following a motion by Senator Isah Hamma Misau (Bauchi Central) under a matter of urgent public importance.

    He said, “The senate had mandated chairmen and vice chairmen of four committees to look into the matter and that is why we are here.

    “Prior to this time there have been information circulating in the media regarding this issue but we will not want to be guided by those information.

    “That is why we don’t want our meeting to be in public domain until we come up with our findings.’’

    He said that the resolution to look into the matter was not meant to “witch-hunting’ anybody.”

    Paulker said that the Senate was only carrying out its constitutional responsibility of ensuring good governance in the country.

    He said that the committee would be guided by the information gathered in the course of the investigation.

    Paulker said, “We will call the press at the end of the investigation. For now we will go into a close-door session so that we will not be swapping between I said this I did not say this.

    “Though Nigerian press is so matured, I am not saying they will misquote us.’’

    He assured that the committee would work to unravel the circumstances surrounding Maina’s secret reappearance and reinstatement.

    Apart from Senator Paulker, who is chairman Senate committee on Establishment, other members of the ad-hoc committee included, Senator David Umaru, Chairman, Senate Committee on Judiciary, Legal Matters and Human Rights, Senator Andy Uba, Chairman Senate Committee on Interior, Senator Chukwuka Utazi, Chairman, Senate Committee on Anti-Corruption and Senator Babajide Omoworare, Chairman Senate Committee on Legislative Compliance.

  • Jega seeks theory/practice bridge

    Jega seeks theory/practice bridge

    Former Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) chairman Prof Attahiru Mohammadu Jega, has observed a lacuna between theory and practice in the Nigerian educational system in teacher training colleges nationwide.

    Jega, said the gaps have hindered effective education provisioning and development in policy conceptualisation and its implementation, pleading that this be bridged.

    He spoke on the theme:  ‘Bridging the gap between theory and practice of education’, at the 37th annual national conference of Philosophers of Education Association of Nigeria (PEAN).

    “We must, as a priority, focus attention on bridging the gap between theory and practice in education provisioning, particularly in policy formulation and implementation,” said Jega, who was represented by Dr. Mohammadu Shaba from the Federal College of Education, Kontangora,

    “We cannot and should not continue with the situation in which policy makers treat theory as basis praxis with contempt and disdain whether ignorantly or arrogantly and selfishly” he added.

    Oyo State Deputy Governor  Otunba Moses Adeyemo, who agreed with Jega’s position, added that there is the need to also address  a huge disconnect between educational planners and practitioners.

    The disconnection, according to him, was because theory has not been successfully turned into practice, where evidence-based findings and teaching will be utilised through shared knowledge and effective partnership.

    He said teachers are no longer respected as their learners show little or no interest in their studies nowadays.

    He said: “Students are no more interested in education as in old times and parents are not doing so much in assisting the children. In the past, we respected our teachers, but that respect has crashed in the world we now live.

    “Government policies are also not helping because you must live in a very good environment for you to learn well. There must be discipline in the education sector either at the primary, secondary or higher institution, while policy makers should make sure we drive towards technological development and match theories with practices.”

    PEAN President, Abubaka Bagudo, who was represented by the association’s 1st vice president Prof Kola Babarinde, said the association, over the years, has addressed topical issues with a view to establishing clarity, objectivity and consistency.

    “The theme would afford us the opportunity to rub minds and reflect on the nations educational endeavors with attendant success and failures,” he said.

     

  • Maina: Senate seeks sack of Malami, Danbazau, others

    Maina: Senate seeks sack of Malami, Danbazau, others

    The Senate Tuesday mandated its joint committee on Public Service, Anti-Corruption, Interior and Judiciary to investigate the circumstances surrounding the controversial return of former Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms, Abdulrasheed Maina to the country.

    The committee is also to determine how Maina was reinstated into the civil service and handed enhanced promotion to the position of director.

    The upper chamber said that development became even curious especially when Maina is on the wanted list of the country for alleged fraudulent activities.

    The resolution followed the adoption of a motion of urgent national importance raised by Senator Isa Hamma Misau (Bauchi South)

    Misau said that the circumstances of Misau’s return and reinstatement into the civil service had become huge embarrassment to the country.

    Many of the senators who contributed to the debate asked the Senate to resolve to ask President Muhammadu Buhari to sack those linked to the development.

    The lawmakers singled out Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami and the Interior Minister, Abdulrahmane Danzabau as two public officials that should be hammered by President Buhari for their alleged roles in the return and reinstatement of Maina.

    Misau said, “Right from day before, you will see the story of somebody who has been declared wanted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).  We read how the man who was declared wanted and was said to be abroad, came back to Nigeria miraculously.

    “Going by the newspaper publications, somebody wanted by the EFCC, left the country for so many years. He was dismissed from the service. He was out for a long time, but smuggled into the service. He left the country as an assistant director. Today, he is a director.

    “We even heard that he goes about with police escort. I wonder how a government that claims to be fighting corruption will be involved in a matter like this. This is a big embarrassment for this country. The people around the President are not helping matters. It appears that the President is the only one talking about corruption. Other people around him are protecting corrupt people.

    “The AGF was mentioned and other people were mentioned. We investigated this case in the 7th Assembly. I am calling on the Senate to investigate this case again.”

    Senate Chief Whip, Senator Olusola Adeyeye in his submission said:

    “I remember what happened then. It got to a point when the former President of the Senate, David Mark, told the former President Goodluck Jonathan to choose between Abdulrasheed Maina and loyalty to the country. It got so bad that Maina had over 30 police officers attached to him.

    “It got so bad that he was always on the front roll whenever the former President travelled. At some point, we thought that he was being protected. I remember one of us was blackmailed and called names. He was accused of taking billions as bribes. Today, that lawmaker was cleared and he is here.

    “Some principalities in power then ferried Maina to neighbouring countries. There is a procedure when it comes to promotion in the civil service. This is an insult on the part of civil servants who have worked so hard.

    “As a member of APC, it is a sad moment. We cannot say that we want to fight corruption and have this approach. Jesus Christ said it is difficult for a rich man to pass through the eyes of a needle.

    “This saddens me and I am sure it saddens all of us. I am glad that following the outrage from the public, the President acted swiftly. We read in the papers that the rules of the civil service were bypassed.

    “It appears there are people in this government who want the President to fail. Every patriot and member of APC in this house must stand out and ensure that the President does not fail.

    “Papers have reported that two Ministers were involved. Those Ministers must be brought to justice. The President must ensure that those Ministers are sacked. Corruption is not only about stealing money. Incompetence too is another form of corruption.

    “I hope that this Senate will not forget its past resolutions on Maina. On it, we still stand. He must be made to stand and face the law. He is not above the law. Steven Oronsaye was accused. He did not leave the country. He stayed back and cleared his name. Maina must do same.

    Senator Kabiru Marafa said:

    “I want to appreciate the person who brought this motion by exposing some dubious people in government. No family can boast of having 100 per cent good people. APC is not an exception. We cannot attribute everything to the President. He should be commended for rising to the occasion.

    “Reinstating Maina is a crime against Nigerians. We should approve a full blown investigation into what happened. We must not allow this thing to go unnoticed.

    Senator Atai Idoko on his part said:

    “We are looking at the symptoms; we are not looking at the cause. Maina is too small to go back to office. Somebody brought him back to the office. Maina is too small. He is not the issue. We should look at those who returned Maina.

    “As we were told, the person who approved this thing is the AGF. The simplest thing the President could do was to terminate the appointment of Maina. That is not the issue. The AGF brought him back. The AGF has a history of doing things like this. The President should tell us what he will do to the AGF.

    Senator Albert Bassey Akpan said:

    “The Senate must investigate and bring to book any person who wants to bring this country to disrepute. We will stand with the Senate to ensure that the right thing is done.

    Senator Tayo Alasoadura on his own cautioned:

    “The President has set up a committee to investigate the matter. We should not call names of people who have not been indicted. We should not duplicate. If the executive has set up a committee, we should not do the same thing. We must not set up committees every time.

    Senator Dino Melaye said:

    “The whole unfolding affair is pathetic. Should we continue in sin and ask grace to abound? The AGF time after time has abused his office. Maina did not get himself back. We should talk about the integrity of the AGF and his office. If the number one law officer is breaking the law, where is the hope?

    “The AGF started with the forgery case against Saraki and Ekweremadu. Something happened we have not noticed. Two public officers had issues and the AGF chose to support the Inspector-General of Police against Senator Isah Hamman Misau. Today, it is Senator Isah versus the Federal Government.

    Tomorrow, if I commit any offence against the friend to the AGF, I will be arraigned. We should not encourage the setting up of investigative committees. The President is surrounded by worms who are bent on destroying the country.

    “There are so many committees that have been set up by the President and the resolutions of those reports may not be implemented until after rapture. Enough is enough. We cannot have this forever. This is wrong. The Senate needs to do something.

    “We must recommend to the President that the AGF has erred in discharging the affairs of his office. If we do not check it, the AGF will plunge us into trouble.

    Senate President, Abubakar Bukola Saraki asked the joint committee to do a thorough job.

    Chairmen and deputies of the four committees were appointed to form an adhoc committee to investigate the issue.

    Saraki concluded: “We are all very disturbed. I want the committee to work hard and bring this matter back to us. We need to investigate the breech in our security and how the anti-corruption war is going.”

  • Constituency disown Jubrin over comments on Buhari

    Constituency disown Jubrin over comments on Buhari

    Thousands of residents from Kiru/Bebeji Federal Constituency Wednesday stormed the state headquarters of the All Progressive Congress (APC), in protest over recent comments credited to former chairman, House Committee on Budget, Abdulmumuni Jubrin, who declared that President Muhammadu Buhari should resign on health grounds.

    The protesters openly disowned Jubril, their representative in the House of Representatives, over what they described as, “mischievous and unwarranted utterances.”

    The protesters, who marched round the Kano state APC secretariat, spreading through Maiduguri Raod and Zaria Road, demanded for the sanction of Jubril.

    Alhaji Mutari Ishyaku Kiru, APC chairman in Kiru Local Government who led the protest, together with Alhaji Sani Kanti Ranka, APC chairman in Bebeji Local Government Area, said, “the people were dissatisfied over the unscrupulous comment of Jubril. He did not consult us who voted for him before making such reckless utterances.

    “We remain loyal to the government of President Muhammadu Buhari, we are loyal the government of Dr. Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, we are loyal to the leadership of Hon. Abbas Abdullahi, our party chairman in Kano.

    “We have nothing to do with Jubril and his inciting utterances. This was the same move that earned him suspension from the House of Representatives. He has not impacted positively on our people. We are no longer with him.”

    Also speaking, the chairman of Kiru Local Government Area, Alhaji Nasiru Mu’azu and his counterpart from Bebeji, Alhaji Mudam Umar, also stated that, “the people remain resolute in their decision to distance themselves from Jubril and his mischievous statement.

    “We are hundred percent in support of President Buhari’s government. That statement is senseless and holds no water.”

    Responding to the demand of the protesters, APC chairman in the state, Hon. Abbas Abdullahi commended the protesters for their peaceful disposition and promised to take their grievances to the appropriate quarters.

    According to him, “we have received your letters, we have listened to you. I promise you that we are taking urgent steps to address the situation. We will abide by the party’s constitution and take appropriate action and sanctions. Surely, we will deal with the situation.”

     

  • Budget padding: Jibrin challenges suspension in fresh suit

    Budget padding: Jibrin challenges suspension in fresh suit

    …Seeks N1bn compensation

    Former Chairman, Appropriation Committee of the House of Representatives, Abdulmumin Jibrin has challenged his suspension from participating in the House’s activities for 180 days.

    The legislator, who was recently suspended following his disagreement with the House’s leadership over alleged fraudulent conduct, including padding of the last national budget, is seeking N1billion damages against the defendants in a fresh suit he filed before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Jibrin, in the suit with House Speaker, Yakubu Dogara, Clerk and others as defendants, wants the court to declare among others, that his suspension amounted to a violation of his fundamental human right to freedom of expression.

    He equally wants a declaration that the resolution passed by the House, suspending him, was in breach of the provisions of Section 68 of the 1999 Constitution.

    Jibrin wants an order of injunction restraining the House from preventing him from participating in its activities, including those of its Committees, or accessing the legislative chambers to perform his legislative duties.

    He seeks an order for the award of N1 billion against the defendants as punitive and general damages for his unlawful suspension.

    Justice John Tsosho, to who the case is assigned, has fixed hearing for November 22.

    Meanwhile, Jibrin withdrew yesterday, an earlier suit he filed before before his suspension.

    He had sought to restrain the House of Reps and its leadership from giving effect to the threat to suspend him.

    Friday, Jibrin’s lawyer, Chukwuma Nwachukwu applied to withdraw the earlier case on the ground that it has been overtaken by event.

    Although defendants’ lawyer, Kalu Onuoha demanded for cost from the plaintiff, Justice Tsoho struck out the suit, but declined Onuoha’s request for cost.

  • House suspension: Court to hear Jibrin’s suit October 21

    House suspension: Court to hear Jibrin’s suit October 21

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed October 21 for hearing of the suit by suspended former Chairman, Appropriation Committee, House of Representatives, Abdulmumin Jibrin.

    Jibrin, from Kano State, is, with the suit, challenging his suspension from the House. A committee of the House of Reps. On October 28 suspended him for 180 legislative days.

    His lawyer, Abdulhamid Muhammed told the court Friday that the House elected to suspend his client in spite of the pendency of his suit filed August 9, 2016 with which he had originally, sought to restrain the House of Rep leadership from proceeding with the plan to suspend him.

    The case which could not be heard during the court’s vacation by Justice Okon Abang, has since been assigned to Justice John Tsoho.

    Muhammed said, by suspending his client, the House has “over-reached” his client’s motion filed before the court for orders of interim injunction restraining the House from carrying out the suspension.

    He proceeded to withdraw his client’s fundamental rights enforcement application on the grounds that it was overtaken by events.

    Justice Tsoho said since the court’s business Friday was for the mention of the case, it was safer to adjourn to a later date for the hearing of all pending motions.

    Besides the processes filed by Jibrin, other motions awaiting the court’s hearing is the preliminary objection by the defendants challenging the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case.

    Defendants’ lawyer,  Kalu Onuoha said he was confortable with the court’s position.

    Defendants in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/595/2016 are:The House of Representatives, the Clerk of the House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara, Yusuf Lasun, Alhassan Ado Doguwa, Leo Ogor, Herman Hembe, Umar Mohammed Bago, Zakari Mohammed, Chike Okafor, Dan Asuquo, Jagaba Adms, Haliru Jika and Uzoma Abonta.

    Jibrin, in the substantive suit, seeks among others, a declaration that the defendants are bound to comply with the provisions of sections 49, 54, 56 and 60 of the 1999 Constitution and the Standing Orders of the House of Reps, regulating its sitting, procedure and other matters in the conduct of its legislative functions as provided in the Constitution and the Standing Orders made pursuant to the Constitution.

    He also wants the court to declaration that the decision taken by the defendants at a meeting held on August 3, 2016 to suspend the plaintiff as a member of the House of Reps without granting him the right to fair hearing is unlawful.

  • Budget padding: Why Dogara, others are after me –  Jibrin

    Budget padding: Why Dogara, others are after me –  Jibrin

    Former Chairman, Appropriation Committee, House of Representatives, Abdulmumin Jibrin disclosed Thursday why the House’s Speaker, Yakubu Dogara and other principal officers of the lower legislative chamber were bent on expelling him.

    Jibrin said he attracted the wrath of the House’s leadership when, as Chairman of the Appropriation Committee he rejected alleged proposals by Dogara and others to corner about N90billion to themselves from the 2016 budget.

    He made this claim in a fresh document he filed before the Federal High Court, Abuja in furtherance of his suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS:595/2016, seeking to among others, restrain the House’s leadership from suspending him from the House.

    Defendants in the suit are the House of Representatives, the Clerk of the House of Representatives, Dogara, Yusuf Lasun (Deputy Speaker), Alhassan Ado Doguwa, Leo Ogor, Herman Hembe, Umar Mohammed Bago, Zakari Mohammed, Chike Okafor, Dan Asuquo, Jagaba Adms, Haliru Jika and Uzoma Abonta.

    In the document filed yesterday, Jibrin, an All Progressives Congress legislator, representing Kiru/Bebeji Federal Constituency of Kano State, said he had some conflicts with the House’s leadership because he rejected their unlawful directives.

    He said, in the document – a counter affidavit – deposed to on his behalf by one of his lawyers, Nura Abdulrrahman that one of such instances was his “refusal to admit into the nation’s 2016 budget the sum of about N30b.

    “His refusal to cover up the decision of the 3rd to 14th defendants’ (Dogara and others’) unilateral decision to allocate to themselves N40b out of the N100b allocated to the entire National Assembly, in addition to what he (Jibrin) considered as wasteful projects of over N20b to the 3rd – 14th defendants’ constituencies.

    “Even when he (Jibrin) had given the defendants/respondents, especially the 3rd (Dogara) statistics of 2000 new projects introduced into the Appropriation Bill by less than 10 committee members, the 3rd defendant took no decision or corrective.

    “When the inflation of the said budget became a matter of public interest and controversy, the defendant, especially the 3rd -14th started taking measures to avoid responsibility and to place the entire issue on the shoulders of the plaintiff so as to use him (Jibrin) as a scapegoat,” Abdulrrahman said in the counter affidavit filed in response to the defendants’ notice of preliminary objection.

    Jibrin denied claim by Dogara that he (the plaintiff) was removed as the Chair of the House’s Appropriation Committee. He said he voluntarily resigned his position and informed Dogara to that effect on July 20, 2016.

    As against the defendants’ claim in their objection that they were no planning to suspend Jibrin, and that the House did not intend to reconvene before the end of its vacation, Jibrin stated that Dogara and others were plotting to reopen the House and suspend him.

    He urged the court to proceed to determine his case. And grant all his reliefs, which include a declaration that the decision taken by the defendants at a meeting held on August 3, 2016 to suspend the plaintiff as a member of the House of Reps without granting him the right to fair hearing is unlawful.

    He also seeks a declaration that the defendants are bound to comply with the provisions of sections 49, 54, 56 and 60 of the 199 Constitution and the Standing Orders of the House of Reps, regulating its sitting, procedure and other matters in the conduct of its legislative functions as provided in the Constitution and the Standing Orders made pursuant to the Constitution.

    Dogara and others have, in the notice of preliminary objection they filed on Tuesday, urged the court to decline jurisdiction to hear the case and strike it out on the grounds that the suit disclosed “no reasonable cause of action.”

    The Clerk, Appropriation Committee of the House of Representatives, Dr. Abel Ochigbo faulted Jibrin’s claims and stated that there was no plan to suspend him and that no meeting has been held to that effect.

    Ochigbo, who deposed to the affidavit supporting the defendants’ objection, stated that all that were done during the process leading to the passage of the budget was within the law. He added that since the budget has become law, nobody could query the steps taken by the law makers.

    “The 2016 Appropriation Act was duly passed by the National Assembly and assented to by the President of the federal Republic of Nigeria. The issue of any officer of the House taking any decisive action against any particular member or members does not arise as the Appropriation Bill has now become the Appropriation Act.

    “The issue of inflation of the 2016 budget does not arise as the Appropriation Bill was passed by the House of Representatives pursuant to powers vested in the House by the Constitution and in line with the Standing Orders of the House.

    “The Bill was duly certified pursuant to the provisions of the Acts Authentication Act before it was duly assented to by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and it is now being executed as an Act of the National Assembly.”

    Yesterday plaintiff’s lawyer, Abdulamid Mohammed informed the court that the defendants served him with their objection on Wednesday and that he has filed a response. He sought a short stand down of proceedings to enable him retrieve a copy of his response from the court’s Registry.

    Defendants’ lawyer, Kalu Onuoha objected to Mohammed’s request for a stand-down. He sought an adjournment to enable him study the plaintiff’s response and decide whether or not to equally respond.

    Trial judge, Justice Okon Abang noted that since it would be impossible for the court to conclude hearing in the case before the end of the court’s long vacation (September 9) it was unnecessary to commence hearing in the case during vacation.

    Justice Abang, who currently sits as the court’s vacation judge, elected to return the case file to the Chief Judge for reassignment after vacation.

     

  • Padding: Lawmakers received $25,000 each for vote of confidence – Jibrin

    Padding: Lawmakers received $25,000 each for vote of confidence – Jibrin

    ….. Its tales by moonlight – Zakari Mohammed

    The budget paddings scandal took yet another turn Wednesday as the former Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, Hon. Abdulmumin Jibrin accused the Speaker, Yakubu Dogara of bribing some members with 25,000 dollars each.

    According to Jibrin, the alleged sum was for the selected members to sign a vote of confidence for the speaker and three other accused principal officers.

    The lawmaker made the allegation in a statement issued to journalists yesterday in Abuja, saying members of the House of Representatives were given 25,000 dollars to sign a register opened at the Speakers Asokoro guest house.

    He further states: “This disgraceful act is coordinated by Hon. Zakari Mohammed, Hon. Jagaba Adams Jagaba and DCOS to Mr Speaker Hon. CID Maduabum.

    “It is a shame that Mr. Speaker has not responded to any of the allegations raised against him but has resorted to look for fraudulent cover

    “My stand is that the corrupt Speaker Dogara, Lasun, Doguwa and Ogor must listen to Nigerians, reconvene the house immediately and step aside.

    “Investigation by anti-graft agencies is already on and I pledge to support the investigation and prosecution of these corrupt public officers, “he said.

    However, in a swift reaction to the allegation, one of the lawmakers accused of distributing the money, Hon. Zakari Mohammed in a tweet quickly debunked the allegation.

    He said: “My attention has been drawn to yet another tweet by the former chairman appropriation committee, Hon Abdulmumin Jibrin saying that I and others were distributing $25,000 to each member of the House, to generate signatures for speaker Dogara’s vote of confidence, “I want to state that the accusation is not only untrue but it is another tales by moonlight to hoodwink Nigerians to malign my image.

    “Fellow countrymen please disregard this cheap blackmail aimed at playing to the gallery, I challenge Mr. Jibrin to name at least 10 members or less who benefitted from the bribe.

    “My advice to Mr. Jibrin is that he should stop the mudslinging of my person and concentrate on licking his self-inflicted wounds.”