The Comptroller General of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Bashir Adewale Adeniyi, has accused companies operating within Nigeria’s Free Trade Zones of violating the laws that govern these zones, causing economic harm to the country.
Speaking on the final day of the Tax Reforms Public Hearing organized by the House of Representatives Committee on Finance, Adeniyi alleged that some companies were conducting business in Customs-controlled areas without complying with existing tax regulations.
Although he initially presented the NCS’s position on tax bills on the first day, Adeniyi was recalled by the committee to address claims by NACCIMA that the Customs Service was imposing taxes and levies on companies within the Free Trade Zones.
Adeniyi said, “the sticky issue over the years has been the compliance of free trade zones operators with the provisions of the law. Whereas, the law allows them to import every manufacturing inputs they need, 100%. Sometimes, including things that are prohibited into the customs territory.
“In fact, a lot of those incentives were given to them for them to manufacture. But the initial incentives were for them to export everything that they import inside this free zone.
Read Also: Troops kill 217 terrorists, arrest 122 oil thieves in February
“But from time to time, I think they started to develop loan proofs for the local markets. And they felt that they can’t trade anything from the local markets.
“So I think there was a need to produce all the services we can provide to the local markets. from the local market to federal market and the regulations of change allowing them to export 25% of volume and factory into the local market, into the local customs territory and subject to extant law affecting goods that are imported into Nigeria.
“I cannot stand here, Mr. Chairman, and tell you that this has been observed absolutely at full compliance. There have been reported violations of these provisions.
“We have seen some of them that were expected to export 100% some of the things that they produce in the free zone into Nigeria. We have even seen cases of some free zone enterprises that want to export to Nigeria. We have seen the import of locally made armored cars, luxury goods.
“Some of them, they are perhaps thinking that this would be for the operations of the free zones. Because we cannot justify this under the labeling act, we have resisted such attempts in the past”.
Former President, Nigerian Bar Association, Yakubu Maikyau asked the National Assembly to ensure that the proposed Tax Reform Bills serve the interests of Nigerians and make their lives better.
Maikyau who said he was speaking in his private capacity and not on behalf of the NBA said, “I have put down in my mind that these proposed bills, these bills that have been submitted to the National Assembly by the President is one that seeks to advance the course of Provide prosperity to the people of this country. Provide empowerment to the people of this country.
“Nigerians expect that arising from this bill will be a regime that will recognize their sacrifices and also they will have an opportunity to see that the sacrifices that they have made in being a part of this process where they are asked to recognize their sacrifices and also they are asked to make contributions in to the development of this economy.
“They will not only be involved in their activities. That is the expectation of Nigerians. And I know that Nigerians appreciate the fact that they are in this place because this is the only place where this kind of business can be undertaken.
“This is my interest because this is a process that is correctable on this continent. And so we have a responsibility beyond the risks that we take from some of you once in the while in the cycle that comes around. We have a responsibility to provide direction to the people of this country and to also advance the course of this country”.
In his closing remark, the Chairman, Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele commended the House for conducting the public hearing in order to allow Nigerians to contribute in having a law that will transform the country’s tax laws and improve economic activities.
Also speaking, the Chairman, Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Zach Adedeji said, the engagement of Nigerians on the Tax Reform Bill through the Public hearing has given Nigerians the opportunity to understand the Bills.
Making their submission earlier, the Congress of University Academics (CONUA) represented by Prof. Isa Abdulraheem opposed the proposed increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) as stated in Chapter 6, Part I, Section 146 of the bill. It recommended maintaining the current VAT rate of 7.5% and broadening the tax base to include more taxable items.
On their part, the Nigerian Investment Promotion Council (NIPC) which was presented by Mrs Uchenna Okonkwo stated that, contrary to the provisions of Section 167 (3), the “NIPC as the processing Agency of the incentives and in the exercise of its statutory mandate of recommending priority sectors/products for incentive should be empowered under this Act to make recommendations to the President for amendments of the list”.
The Association of Bureaux De Change Operators of Nigeria (ABCON) expressed reservations over the impacts of some provisions of the Bills on their transactions.
Represented by Chairman, North Central Zone, Thomas Okoye, the group said coupled with the directive of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) on the astronomical increase of the Capital Base of Bureau De Changes (BDCs), further taxes will strangle their business and push many out which will cause unemployment in the country.
Chairman of the committee, James Abiodun Faleke said that, Public hearing provided a platform where stakeholders give their inputs which will be incorporated to come up with a balanced legislation that incorporated important shades of opinions.
He commended the stakeholders who made observations and suggestions as a group or individuals, agencies of government and private entities as well as government agencies.
Faleke said, “We’ve done that now, the public have responded to us, we will now look at every detail to propose a bill, a bill that will now be passed into law, considered by the House, if the House agrees with all our suggestions.
“When we finish and we lay a report and it is discussed on the floor or debated and passed, we will compare with what the Senate passed, any areas of differences, we will harmonize”.

