Tag: front burner

  • Worries over insecurity back on front burner

    Providing security for Nigeria’s growing population of about one hundred and seventy million people has become a big issue in recent times and the outgoing year 2018 was no exemption. As a new year berths, an election year at that, concerns are being raised about the security challenges likely to confront the nation, writes Assistant Editor, Dare Odufowokan.

    AS we wind up 2018 and approach the brand new 2019, Nigerians across divides are worried about the security situation in the country and are hoping very strongly that the federal government will place the need to address their worries atop its wish list. Their anxieties are not unfounded, giving the many threats to national security in recent time.

    In the outgoing year, the tense security situation proved challenging for the government, forcing it to adopt various measures. In the end, much is still left to be done to improve the situation across the country. The headlines about insecurity that shaped the year 2018 in Nigeria include the Boko Haram crisis in the northeast, armed robbery, ethnic crises, cultism, cattle rustling, kidnapping and among many others.

    Sadly, most of these challenges are yet to be surmounted. To say the least, many of them have even escalated beyond what they were at the beginning of this current year.

    Meanwhile, 2019 is an election year and analysts say it is important for the government to make security a priority right from the first day of the New Year if the country’s challenges are not to be further complicated.

    Recently, the Minister of Defence, Mansur Dan-Ali, declared that the National Security Council was ready to curb every challenge during the forthcoming general elections. He said the council recommended the deployment of security agencies to the states, to enable the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) conduct the elections peacefully.

    He was hopeful that the deployment of security personnel would further douse the tension created by the outcome of the political parties’ primaries and “some desperate persons” to sabotage the electoral process.

    Similarly, federal legislators have approved expenditures for security agencies towards the success of the election. The Senate approved the security budget of N53.2 billion for the 2019 general elections. The approval of the budget followed a presentation of the report of the National Assembly Joint Committee on Appropriation at plenary. The lower chamber of the National Assembly, House of Representatives equally approved N831.3bn virement for INEC, security agencies.

    To benefit from this fund are INEC, ONSA, DSS, NSCDC, NIS and NPF based on the approved request by President Muhammadu Buhari for passage. Several other efforts geared towards putting adequate security measures in place ahead of the elections are either in the pipeline or being implemented as we speak.

    But with all these efforts, is it safe to say there should be no fear or concern with regards to preparation for the 2019 general elections?  Given the current state of insecurity across the country, it is difficult to answer that question in the affirmative.

    All through the outgoing year, the situation was so bad that analysts claimed the nation’s economy suffered immensely from the many effects of these security challenges especially as regards foreign investments.

    Billionaire businessman, Aliko Dangote, speaking earlier in the year, had said: “The security situation in the country is discouraging agribusiness investors. Most of the people that own large farms on the Kaduna-Abuja Road have abandoned their farms due to the menace of kidnapping.”

    His position underscores the seriousness of the problem as the very first day of the year marked the beginning of sorrow, tears and blood occasioned by insecurity. On that first day of January 2018, residents of six communities in two local government areas of Benue State began the year on a sad note when about 50 persons were cruelly murdered in cold blood by rampaging herdsmen.

    Casualties included women, children and some members of the Live Stock Guards who were assigned to enforce the anti-open grazing law. The affected communities are Gaambe-Tiev, Ayilamo and Turan all in Logo Local Government Area as well as Umenger, Tse-Akor and Tomatar near Tse-Abi in Nongov District of Guma Local Government Area.

    Few days later, at least three people were confirmed killed in a blast in the northeastern town of Madagali. Boko Haram terrorists were soon to claim responsibility for the dastardly act, in continuation of their reign of terror in the region. Then, the nation witnessed a return of the face-off between followers of Zaria, Kaduna State-based Shiite cleric, Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, who has been in detention for months now.

    Alongside widespread kidnapping, incessant armed robbery, worrisome ethnic clashes and frightening cult-related fracas and killings, the Boko Haram insurgency made headlines all through the year, giving strong indications that the nation’s security situation requires more stringent measures to put it on the track to peace.

    By the time 2018 entered its last month, the growing ambushment and killing of federal troops added to the growing concerns about safety across the country.

    Security threats

    Everywhere you look these days, it seems like a new problem is cropping up to impact the nation’s security. While many of the challenges have actually been with us for years now, the reality is, they have not been firmly dealt with and new ones, like election-related violence, renewed herdsmen killings and gang wars, are springing up day by day.

    The nation’s landscape is changing, as serious considerations about safety and security are now major priorities for businesses and travelers. In recent years, there has been the emergence of new developments that are fast changing our cities and roads; talk about Internally Displaced Persons’ (IDP) camps that now dot our landscapes and the heavy militarization of some of our major cities, especially in the northeast, and you will be right on track.

    The foregoing is a pointer to the fact that the security challenges of 2018, may remain the same for years to come, if left unattended to in 2019. The following are issues that whoever wins the February 16 presidential polls would contend with:

    Boko Haram

    Any conversation about security in Nigeria today must touch on the menacing activities of Boko Haram insurgents in the northeast. Though this terrorist organization has been unleashing havoc on the northeastern part of the country for years – coming into global limelight with the infamous abduction of over 200 schoolgirls from their dormitory in the sleepy town of Chibok in 2014 – the emergence of the Ansaru faction made its evil activities more pronounced in the year 2018.

    Analysts ascribe the increase in abductions, killings and deadly attacks by the insurgents to the nature of the leadership offered by the new splinter group by Abu Musab Al-Barnawi, son of the late founder of the group, Muhammad Yusuf.

    Initially he was thought to be less extreme than Abubakar Shekau in his approach to killings and other vices, but the young man in 2018 proved people wrong as his faction championed much of the slaughter and abductions by the sect.

    It has been argued that the resort to increased violence by factions of Boko Haram in spite of claims by the federal government that the insurgents have been ‘tactically defeated’, may not be unconnected with the intense rivalry among its leaders. A pointer to this is the hurried manner in which the Shekau faction joined in the kidnapping and ambushment game this year. Currently, it is as if a contest in viciousness is ongoing between the factions.

    The highlight of the activities of this group in 2018 remain the kidnap of the Dapchi schoolgirls and the continued detention of Leah Sharibu, the Christian girl who reportedly refused to renounce her faith as a condition for being freed alongside other abducted girls. The young schoolgirl, who turned 15 last May, was whisked away from her hostel along with 109 other girls. The others were later released a month later but Leah remains in captivity till date.

    In 2013, Boko Haram was designated a terrorist group by the US after it declared a caliphate in areas under its control and started kidnapping foreigners. But in spite of the designation, little was done in 2018 by the US and other world powers to help Nigeria combat this menace. Their realization of the need to do more to help Nigeria and other affected nations tackle this problem is one of the urgent steps that must be taken in 2019 if this terror is to be tamed.

    As talks on what government should do to end the menace in 2019 rages, one area observers are urging President Buhari to look into is the issue of the nation’s porous borders. Nigeria has borders that are poorly guarded. Insurgents from other countries can infiltrate easily, making it very difficult to curtail the reinforcement efforts of the insurgents when depleted by federal troops. This may partly explain why the insurgents are thriving in the Northeast.

    Herdsmen killings

    The killings in Benue State that heralded the New Year with sorrow, tears and blood remained in the headlines for much of 2018 as bloodletting by suspected herdsmen continued.

    To underscore the menace that killer herdsmen were in 2018, the International Crisis Group (ICG) in its half year report issued last July, said armed herders were six times deadlier than Boko haram insurgents.

    The report then recommended urgent steps that the Nigerian government must take to stem further attacks. “What were once spontaneous attacks have become premeditated scorched-earth campaigns in which marauders often take villages by surprise at night,” the non-profit think-tank said. “Now claiming about six times more civilian lives than the Boko Haram insurgency, the conflict poses a grave threat to the country’s stability and unity, and it could affect the 2019 general elections.”

    The report also found that the anti-open grazing statutes recently enacted by state governments in Benue and Taraba States also contributed to the escalation in latest attacks. “The Benue State government should freeze enforcement of its law banning open grazing, review that law’s provisions and encourage a phased transition to ranching,” the ICG said. It suggested that that Buhari’s approach to solving the crisis is acceptable but largely insufficient.

    Similarly, the International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law, Intersociety, claimed that 1,750 Christians and other non-Muslims fell to the weapons of rampaging killer herdsmen and Boko Haram insurgents in the first six months of 2018.

    “From our general evaluation too, no fewer than 2,360 innocent Nigerians were killed. 1,750 by herdsmen, 250 by Boko Haram and 360 by Zamfara bandits in the first six months of 2018 (Jan-June 2018),” it reported.

    “No fewer than 13,221 defenseless Nigerians also got killed by the trio as well as the security agencies in the past three years. “The total death toll in Plateau State following the 23rd and 24th June 2018 coordinated attacks and killings in eleven villages may most likely have hit 300, from its present 250, out of which 218 bodies have been recovered and buried in mass graves. Dozens of people are still missing after the head count was carried out,” the society claimed last July.

    The federal government says ranching is one way out of the crisis. It promised that will take off soon but it is yet to start as the year rolls to an end.

    In 2019, beyond ranching, security measures that will curtail the deadly activities of the herdsmen are expected from the country’s political leadership. Buhari will be expected to walk his recent talk on how he intends to checkmate killer herdsmen if the security situation of the country is to improve.

    Kidnapping

    With the arrest of wanted kidnapper, Chukwudi Dumeme Onuamadike a.k.a. Evans, and other members of his gang in Lagos, there were high hopes that the menace of kidnapping will be curtailed in 2018. Alas, such hopes were dashed as the menace became pronounced in the outgoing year. Beyond high profile abductions, criminals now kidnap for as low as a few thousands, making both the rich and the poor possible victims of kidnappers.

    When snatching people for ransom began in the creeks of the Niger Delta some years ago, nobody thought it would become the menace it is today. It was largely seen as a tactic in the agitation back then. But today, it is one of the most ‘lucrative businesses’ among the nation’s teeming bands of criminal-minded and jobless youths across the nooks and crannies of the country.

    From January, the nation witnessed several cases of kidnapping. The most bizarre was the abduction of a busload of passengers coming from Enugu to Lagos last September. The passengers were released after their relatives paid ransom to the kidnappers. The ‘God is Good Motors’ transport company vehicle they were traveling in was intercepted at Ore in Ondo State around noon. The passengers were taken to an unknown destination.

    To Musa Ahmed, the Secretary General, Association of Licensed Private Security Practitioners of Nigeria (ALPSPN), the poor state of the economy condition should be blamed for the rising wave of kidnaps.

    He said: “Some people are even tired of living. If you look at the crop of people involved in kidnapping today, most of them are not educated; even the educated ones among them don’t have jobs. So, they see crime as a way out.

    “The economic situation in the country is now strangulating. It is driving many people into doing a lot of things. It is now obvious that both the literate and the illiterate are finding life tough. So, some people are going into crimes, kidnapping in particular, because it is paying. Also, we have enormous security challenges plaguing the country. So, people are taking advantage of everything happening around them,” he said.

    Election violence

    In 2019 the government must be prepared to deal with possible violence that will be a fallout of electioneering campaigns. Already, the nation has witnessed flashes of what can befall it when politicians fully take to the hustings in the New Year. From Port-Harcourt to Ilorin, from Kano to Owerri; Kaduna to Oyo and Yola to Asaba, election violence has reared its ugly head.

    Just days back, the sleepy town of Ilorin was almost thrown into chaos when supporters of political parties disrupted an annual event that had the respected Emir of Ilorin, Alhaji Sulu Gambari, in attendance. Expectedly, the two leading parties are now exchanging words over who is to blame.

    Recently, the United States Government expressed fear that the 2019 elections in Nigeria are likely to be characterised by violence. It said the conduct of the elections could have significant consequences for the democratic trajectory of the country, West Africa, and entire continent. It, however, said the public disturbance that the elections would cause might not be “large-scale nationwide conflict” but “localised violence.”

    The US Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of African Affairs, Tibor Nagy, disclosed this in his presentation during the US Congressional hearing on Nigeria’s forthcoming elections in Washington DC. Senate President, Bukola Saraki; Vice Chairman, Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Ben Murray-Bruce; and the Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs, Nnena Ukeje, were present at the hearing titled, “Nigeria at a Crossroads: The Upcoming Elections.”

    Bishop Matthew Kukah of the Sokoto Catholic Diocese who is the Secretary of the General Abdulsalami Abubakar-led National Peace Committee, has also expressed worries over the next elections, urging the government to ensure that peace reigns before, during and after the polls across the country. He called on politicians and political parties to always think of the larger interest as they mount the podium to campaign.

    No doubt, as the election approaches, apprehension will increase. One good news is that the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Idris, has warned Commissioners of Police in the 36 states and the FCT and other senior officers against partisanship during the upcoming 2019 general elections. He also directed them to arrest and prosecute any party member or supporters in possession of firearms or dangerous weapons during campaigns and rallies.

    The IG said that the Force would not condone hate speeches, indecent and criminal conducts from any individual or groups.

    If the police and other security agencies all back their words with action, the country may witness a peaceful election. But if they don’t, their partisanship and meddling may lead to a chaotic election that could further deepen the security challenges of Nigeria in the New Year..

  • Education is in the front burner of  this administration, says Obaseki 

    Education is in the front burner of this administration, says Obaseki 

    Edo State Governor, Mr Godwin Obaseki has said his administration would prioritise education to ensure the sector received rapid infrastructural development in continuation of the policies put in place by the Adams Oshiomhole-led administration.
    The governor disclosed this in Benin, on Monday, during the 77th Plenary Meeting of the Joint Consultative Committee on Education (JCCE) holding in New Era College, where he was represented by the permanent secretary, Ministry of Education, Mrs Osazuware Idahosa.
    Addressing delegates during the plenary, the governor called on all stakeholders in the education sector to deliberate meaningfully and ensure that the challenges militating against the sector were nipped in the bud for good.
    Meanwhile, he charged them to come up with qualitative policies that would put value on education for effective service delivery, reaffirming the state government’s commitment to the laudable programme.
    For her part, the Chairperson of JCCE, Magdalene Anene Maidoh noted that the meeting was to examine the memorandum that has come from the reference committee concerning policy issues in Education.
    She added that the overall objective of the meeting was to develop a policy framework that captured, inclusively, a system of education in Nigeria where everyone had equal opportunity to learn, regardless of vulnerability and disability.
    The stakeholder explained that this could only be achievable if teachers’ capacities were expanded, and their role in nation building was recognised.
    In the same vein, she continued that the recommendations of the committee would be forwarded to the National Council on Education (NCE), which was the highest policy making body in Nigerian on education.
    Present during the event were distinguished delegates drawn from across the education sector in the 36 states of the federation.

  • Restructuring returns to front burner

    Restructuring returns to front burner

    The call for the restructuring of the Nigerian federation has been on the front burner of national discourse for some time now. Proponents of the idea believe that the 1999 Constitution has virtually imposed a unitary system on the country. Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN examines the implications of the warped arrangement for national development and stability.

    NIGERIANS are yearning for the restructuring of the polity to create room for the federating units to tackle the country’s persisting under-performance and failure to achieve development potentials. The present constitutional arrangement, which over-concentrates power at the centre, has been blamed for the country’s woes, because the monthly sharing of revenue encourages indolence.

    In the opinion of many observers, the current structure is more or less a unitary system of government masquerading as a federal structure. Being a complex plural society, with 170 million people, divided into over 250 ethnic groups and over 700 linguistic groups, the observers argue that Nigeria can only continue to exist as a nation on the basis of a federal system of government in the true sense of the word.

    To revert to true federalism, they say, the federal arrangement must be devoid of all the structural and institutional deformities and encumbrances foisted on it by the former British colonial master and by a devastating and prolonged military rule. In a true federal set up, the powers and responsibilities of the centre and the federating units or states must be equal and coordinate. The way things are now, states and local governments take directives from the Federal Government. A federal constitution is always a compromise between the need or the desire for union and the rights and responsibilities of the states forming the union.

    Former Commonwealth Secretary-General, Chief Emeka Anyaoku believes that given its history and pluralistic character, a federal system of government is inevitable for Nigeria to achieve its development potentials and enjoy an enduring political stability. He said: “If the country is to tackle more effectively the challenges confronting it, it would need to restructure its present governance structure.

    “The structure and governance system in the United States of America, with which our constitution is frequently compared, attest to the efficacy of federalism when properly organised. The strength of the United States federalism lies in its unity in diversity, the vitality and strength of the constituent states, which yields some powers to the federal government while still retaining their cherished autonomy. This arrangement is nourished by the country’s equally powerful institutions and generations of its committed leadership.”

    Anyaoku made reference to the speech of Alexander Hamilton at the convention to ratify the constitution of the United States on June 17, 1788, when he spoke about the balance that American federalism created and the immense benefit this balance offered to the American people. According to the former Commonwealth scribe, quoting Hamilton, “this balance between the national and state governments ought to be dwelt on with peculiar attention, as it is of the utmost importance. It forms a double security to the people. If one encroaches on their rights, they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed, they will both be prevented from over passing their constitutional limits by a certain rival ship, which will ever subsist between them.”

    Anyaoku noted that it was the absence of such balance that is lacking in Nigeria’s federal structure and which has continued to be a clog in the wheel of the country’s progress, especially since after the First Republic.

    Constitutional lawyer, Richard Adejumo, identified the deficient political structures of the country as a formidable obstacle to the attainment of true federalism in Nigeria. He said many of the 36 states created show neither economic viability nor ethnic homogeneity. Except in some few states like the Southwest and Southeast; others portray domineering majorities and restless minorities; some also contain rival ethnic groups with possible revolting instincts. Under these circumstances, it might be impossible to expect stability in a federation, he stressed.

    Adejumo noted that before independence in 1960, the country had operated a federal system of government based on three regions with each region fully responsible for its internal affairs, except foreign affairs, defence and banking matters handled by the Federal Government. Even after independence, the three regions and the newly-created Midwest operated the federal system in accordance with the provisions of the 1960 Constitution.

    He regretted that the military coup of 1966 and the subsequent civil war of 1967 to 1970 altered the political system by introducing a unitary command system. The military governors of the states were made answerable to the military Head of State at the centre. “Though the 1979 Constitution had accepted the concept of federalism, but indirectly conferred on the President the powers of the former military Head of State. It appeared so in practice and not in law.”

     

    Call for new federating units

     

    There have calls to transform the current six geo-political zones into federating units. This is based on the belief that the current 36-state structure is unsustainable because many of the states are not viable. The former Commonwealth scribe is one of those who share this view. He said: “The relatively non-viable 36 states have become economically handicapped that most of them now find it difficult even to pay the salaries of their civil servants and the minimum wage of N18, 000.”

    To remove this imbalance, Anyaoku said the National Assembly should convert the existing six geo-political zones, which have been recognised and are being used for a number of political decisions and actions, into the new federating units.

    He added: “The 36 states can be retained as development zones within the regions, but without full administrative paraphernalia. And it would be up to the six federating regions to consider and meet any demands for the creation of new development zones within them. As more viable units for planning and attracting investments in larger development projects, the six regions will facilitate the necessary shift from the present philosophy and reliance by the 36 states on “sharing the national cake”, to focusing on production and internally generated revenue within the regions.

    “In n addition, internal security and crime control can be more effectively managed by the people in the regions who and are more familiar with the local environment.”

     

    New power sharing arrangement

     

    The lopsided relationship between the centre and the federating units makes it imperative for Nigerians to clamour for a new proper sharing formula that would put the country back on the path of true federalism.

    A political scientist, Professor Ayo Olukotun, said the success of any federal system of government has to do with how powers are shared between the central government and the federating units. He added: “If there is concentration of power at the centre, as it obtains today, the states would remain mere appendages. In this kind of set up, the system is unable to impact positively on the citizenry. This is the tragedy of Nigeria’s federal system.”

    Olukotun emphasised that equilibrium must be struck in such a way that the centre will not be too weak to the point of threatening the unity of the country, nor too strong to the point of emasculating the component units.

    Public affairs analyst Dr. Alhassan Mohammed, shares Olukotun’s view. He said that over concentration of power at the federal level, as it is in Nigeria today, is not the best way to achieve the much-needed development. He said there is need to grant greater autonomy to state and local governments.

    He justified his call for new power sharing formula when he said that the central government is too far away from the people and cannot possibly cover the whole country in an effective manner. This is why the Federal Government has not been able to make the desired impact in service delivery and infrastructural development in the country. He cited the security situation in the country as a proof that centralisation of power at the federal level is not working.

    He added: “If the state and local governments were allowed to set up their own police force, rampant bombings and killings going on in the country would have stopped because the security apparatus at the local level would be more conversant with the criminals and their hideouts. Through joint efforts with the local police, the criminals would have been rounded up.”

     

    An equitable revenue

    sharing formula

     

    Revenue allocation has remained a contentious issue since the military intervention that set aside the constitutional provision on revenue allocation. Section 134 (1) of the 1960 Constitution stipulates: (a) “There shall be paid the federation to each region a sum equal to 50 per cent of the proceeds of any royalty received by the federation in respect of any mineral extracted in that region and any mining rents derived by the federation  from any region.

    “The federation shall credit to the Distributable Pool Account a sum equal to 30 per cent of the proceeds of any royalty in respect of the mineral extraction in any region and any mining rents derived by the federation from any region.”

    So, the remaining 20 per cent is kept by the Federal Government as its own share. Under the colonial rule, the revenue allocation was fashioned in such a way that regions will derive revenue from the Federation Account according to the functions and powers which the regions would carry out under the constitution.

    Elder statesman, Alhaji Femi Okunnu, said we are not ready to face the historical truth about the basis of the revenue allocation; the reason why in the colonial era and, until 1979, why Federal Government was assigned only 20 per cent of the revenue allocation instead of the 54 per cent the Federal Government now takes for running the central government.

    Okunnu said that was how government at independence up to the time of Murtala/Obasanjo regime followed the fixed constitutional formula of 20 per cent to the Federal Government, 50 per cent to state of origin and the remaining 30 per cent to distributive pool to be shared among the regions.

    The former Federal Commissioner of Works and Housing said the Federal Government functions as listed in the 1999 Constitution include: Weights and Measures, Traffic on the federal roads, Declaration of Water ways, Stamp duties, Quarantine, Designation of professional occupation, Passport and Visa, Insurance, Law of Evidence, Defence, Awards of National Honour, Law on Copyright and such other functions which do not require a great deal of expenditure.

    He called for a review of the sharing formula and suggested that the Federal Government allocation should go down to 25 per cent, if not 20 per cent as before; state of origin at least 25 per cent, if not 35 per cent, and the remainder should go to distributive pool.

     

    Derivation and

    resource control

     

    The oil-rich Niger Delta region is pushing for the return to status quo, to give the federating units the control of their economic activities and finances. An economist, Dr Frank Ezimora, noted that the contentious issue had been settled by the 1960 Independence and 1963 Constitutions. He said it was the law of Nigeria before and after independence that the federating units, the regions controlled their economic activities and finances, keeping 50 per cent of all revenues and contributing 50 per cent to the Federation Account, out of which 30 per cent was shared among the regions, leaving 20 per cent to the Federal Government.

    Ezimora said the law was changed in 1969 by the Yakubu Gowon-led military administration, when the crude oil from the Niger Delta became the mainstay of the economy. The change was effected without consultation or mandate from the people, he added.

  • State police: Back on the front burner

    The agitation for state police, one of the components of true federalism, has resurfaced in the national discourse.  MUSA ODOSHIMOKHE examines the issues that have been militating against its establishment and how it can become a reality. 

    THERE has been growing calls for the establishment of state police over the years, to complement the efforts of the federal police in combating crime and criminality in the country. The idea has always been shut down each time it surfaces.

    Nevertheless, it is one issue that continues to generate interest. During the 2014 National Conference convened by former President Goodluck Jonathan, delegates canvassed different positions. It was also a campaign issue during the last general elections.

    It resonated once again during the screening of ministerial nominees by the National Assembly. Former Lagos State Governor Babatunde Fashola brought it back into national discourse when he was screened by the Senate. He said it is grossly inadequate for Nigeria to have only 500,000 police personnel for the over 170 million Nigerians.

    Fashola said it has become imperative to for the states to establish their own police, in line with the federal structure of the country. According to the former governor, state police could be saddled with cases of domestic violence and rape issues, while the federal police should be engaged in other matters related to crime prevention.

    He further explained that the creation of state police would provide job opportunities for graduates roaming the streets. The police, he noted, have much to gain from the reservoir of knowledge laying fallow across.

    Graduates of criminology and strategic thoughts abound across the country, but have not been offered the opportunity to serve in the force because of the limited slots only available under the federal police.

    Those arguing for the creation of state police believe that since the state government have their own executive, judiciary and legislature, it would be wrong to prevent them from establishing their police.

    One of the major duties of the police is to investigate criminal activities, based on the finding of the police; those seeking justice would have the benefit to get it.

    Analysts say if the states are made of executive, judiciary and legislature, it would be wrong not to have state police. They contend that the establishment of state police would speed up criminal investigation in the state, which is often bugged down by federal bureaucracy.

    Speaking on the lopsided federal structure of Nigeria, Sen. Olubunmi Adetunbi said the country has the unique opportunity to address some of the historical imbalances in Nigeria’s federalism.

    He said: “I am not surprised that in recent times, there has been a lot of debate for and against state police. The fact that Nigerians are debating it is a healthy development. The federal police in other places like United States of America (USA) have full authority to enforce federal laws at all level. The states in the US have state-wide police organisation that provide law enforcement duties in the states.’’

    Adetunbi explained that even in Britain, Nigeria’s colonial master has its territorial police which perform duties in defined jurisdiction. He cited India, Pakistan, Argentina and Ethiopia as countries with less sophisticated political structures, adhering to the principle of federalism.

    He said: “In Argentina, the job of policing the country is done not only by the federal police, but also by 23 provincial police forces.

    “In Nigeria, the state governments have the power to set up the executive, operate independent judiciary that has relationship with the federal government justice system. They have parliament, but they have no authority over law enforcement. It is an imbalance composition of a modern state. There should be a consensus on how states can police their territories.’’

    Those against state creation argue that the structure could be used for witch-hunting. They believe that many governors have the tendency to use power excessively. During the last general elections, the raw use of power was prevalent.

    They also argue that the creation of state police will lead to armed proliferation. This, according to the traditional ruler of Ossomala Kingdom, Anambra State, Chief Victor Awogu, the country is presently having security challenges because of too many arms circulating the landscape.

    He said if the 36 states are allowed constitutionally independent police, its means more arms would have to be put into circulation.

    Political analysts say the debate over the establishment of state police has been politicised. They argue that the division between the North and South over the matter could be gleaned from the fact that the bulk of those calling for its establishment are from the South.

    For instance, Senator Godswill Akpabio said state police is the only solution to resolving most of the intra- conflicts in the country. He said: “In most developed democracies, policing is not a federal thing alone. Policing 160 million Nigerians by the federal police alone is not possible. You must allow the local council to have its say in the policing. The state should have its say and the federal government should equally have its say.’’

    Sharing the same position on the creation local police, former Presidential candidate of the United Peoples Party (UPP), Chief Chekwas Okorie, said state police is the reform needed to check criminal activities and reduce corruption.

    He added that the country is too big geographically for the central police to oversee. Okorie added: “There are some states in the country that have far more number of Commissioners of Police that even the entire geo-political zones.

    “Let the revenue be adjusted to give to give the states more money to handle their police and it they decide to make everybody Commissioner of Police, it is their headache so that the normal growth and reward will be noticed.’’

    Former Kaduna State Governor Balarabe Musa underscored the division between the North and the South over the issue of state police when he said state police is a weapon of oppression.

    He explained that their experience on the use of state police in the North was a bitter tale. According to him, it was state police that were used in rigging election and scaring voters from performing their civic responsibilities.

    Musa added: “I still hold to my position that state police is weapon against human rights. The police in the North was used against the people during election. In this dispensation, they will not be any different from the way they were used in the past.’’

    Defending the North’s opposition to the creation of state police, he said those who supported its creation in the North and used it to campaign during the elections have realised that state police is anti-people.

    He said: “That is why they have changed their position and no longer interested in supporting the creation of state police. They now understand that state police will work against the people and it is not a popular idea.’’

    Former Military President Ibrahim Babangida said in spite of the divergent views by different interest groups on the matter that there is need to forge ahead with the establishment of state police.

    He added: “There is the need for us to go forward; I don’t think thing there is anything wrong with state police. I believe that state police will work. In 1959, the local police were used to beat and harass people during election, but the situation is different today.

    “I don’t believe the fear of what happened in the 1950s should continue to haunt us; we should try to move on. We have gone beyond that level in this country. Honestly, I don’t think any governor today can use state police to intimidate and harass anybody.”

    Though the agitation for state police is weighty, it has not been able to scale through because of divergent proposition. For instance, during the last National Conference, it was expected that creation of state police would fly.

    “The idea suffered some setbacks when it was rejected. The Presidential Committee on Police Reforms opposed the creation of state police. According to the chairman of the reform committee, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Parry Osayande (rtd), the country would break up if introduced.

    “According to Osayande, if the Police Council functions properly, with the President as the chairman, the Chairman of the Police Service Commission being a member, the Inspector General of Police a member, then the police would function well. We don’t need state police. The country will break up.’’

    Human rights lawyer Femi Falana said the issue of state police is not about how prepared the country is for it. He noted that in a federal system of government state police is necessary.

    “The issue of establishing state police is not really about whether the country is ready for it or not. It is necessary in a federation. What has been militating against the re-establishment of state police has been the fear that the state executives, just like the Federal Government, can use it to harass political opponents.’’

    Tracing the history of state police in Nigeria, Edo State-based political analyst, Mr. Neville Obakhedo, said when the British established the Nigeria Police Force (NPF) in 1961, it had 30-member consular guard in the Lagos Colony.

    He said in 1894 the Niger Coast Constabulary was put in place under the Royal Niger Company, Lokoja. But, with collapse of the Northern and Southern Protectorates in 1914, the police was merged and its headquarters was in Lagos.

    Obakhedo added: “It is this merger that had grown to become the centralised police system in Nigeria. This is at variance with the federal system of government currently operated in Nigeria.’’

    Political analysts equally believe that the call for state police was borne out of genuine and patriotic zeal. Pro-National Conference Organisation (PRONACO) Director of Strategy, Linus Okoroji, said Asiwaju Bola Tinubu was one of the few patriots who identified the need to save Nigeria from incessant security failure.

    He said: “With regards to issue of state police, it was Tinubu who saw the need for it in his first term as governor of Lagos State. He saw that the security of state was porous, giving room for criminality.

    “There is the need for state police to effectively combat the ugly trend in Lagos State. If states have their police, they would battle crime to a standstill because they understand and know people who live within the locality.’’