Tag: gates

  • Buhari’s many ‘gates’

    Mainagate’. Nigerians are confronted with yet another sorry tale of recklessness in an on-going thread of discordant exercise of official functions and administrative disarray. This time, Abdulrasheed Maina, the otherwise forgotten former head of the Presidential Task Team on Pension Reforms under former President Goodluck Jonathan, who is most famous for evading prosecution in 2013, is at the centre of this new saga.

    Maina had been duly dismissed from the civil service by the Federal Civil Service Commission in 2013 after allegations of fraud and embezzlement were brought against him by a senate committee. He fled the country after he was declared wanted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC. His recent reappearance and re-instatement into the federal civil service seems to have enjoyed the support of the upper hierarchy of the civil service and the top law officer of the country.

    As soon as the news of his quiet re-instatement broke out, Abdulrahman Dambazau, the Minister of Interior and Winifred Oyo-Ita, Head of the Federal Civil Service, were quick to wash their hands off responsibility. It was as though it were possible that his reappearance and subsequent re-instatement through the Ministry of Interior, could occur without their knowledge, or was altogether false.

    But thanks to excellent journalistic work by Premium Times, the renowned online news outlet who broke the news, we now know more than the advocates would wish the people to know. The newspaper revealed evidence of their correspondence that exposed the careful manoeuvre of words and calculated sidestepping in letters, which is common in the civil service hierarchy when officers are deflecting liability. It was then it became clear, at least from the deliberate wording of the letters, that none other than Abubakar Malami, the Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, was the originator of the move. Oyo-Ita who is reported to have initially resisted the move, masterfully passed the buck, while Dambazau, whose ministry made the final decision and the AGF who gave the initial directive, are left with soiled hands in this roiling scandal.

    The AGF claimed in an interview that he acted in “public interest” in initiating the move. He also stated that with clearance from his principal, the president, he is ready to make full disclosure and clarifications. From his veiled remarks so far, it is easy to pinpoint the AGF as the key to the unfolding scandal. As a man answerable to the president, one may wonder if the buck does not rise further than the AGF’s office.

    So where does the buck stop? President Harry Truman, the 33rd President of the United States of America, is reported to have kept a sign on his desk reading “the buck stops here”, meaning, as the commander-in-chief, ultimate responsibility for decisions and outcomes, rests with him. Over the past couple of months, after episodes of different scandals, we are fed with feedback suggesting that President Muhammadu Buhari may have been unaware of the questionable acts or motives of his appointees. It has become methodical in the damage control strategy of the presidency, but it is becoming old and wearisome for the president to continue to feign ignorance over some of the acts that are ascribed to his officials.

    This is why Buhari’s immediate directive that Maina be ‘disengaged’ from the civil service, may not have the desired effect that the presidency wishes it to have on the mood of the public. The list of things the president seems to be unaware of is growing by the day and the people are becoming sceptical and wary at the possibilities of the president being so disengaged from his officials. Already, we know that Maina has been entering and leaving the country at will and the Department of State Security, DSS, and interestingly, the police, have been offering him and his properties protection since his disappearance in 2013. It, therefore, seems all the more unlikely that the president is unaware of Maina’s eventual emergence and reinstatement.

    The truth is that Maina seems to have leveraged on powerful people in the corridors of power. This may explain why the president’s men seem blind to his unsavoury history, but instead, focus on the legalese as a justification for engaging the ‘fugitive’. Okoi Obono-Obla, the president’s Special Assistant on Prosecution said last Monday in an interview on Channels Television that Maina has not been convicted by any court and as such, he sees no ground for the uproar about his re-absorption into the federal civil service. This is an insult on the intelligence of Nigerians. It is also, a tacit pronouncement that the much orchestrated war against corruption is dead and awaiting final interment.

    The special assistant may not be wrong. Maina’s arrest warrant by a court in 2015 was extinguished by a subsequent court pronouncement in 2016. Even his red-listing by Interpol is not technically an international arrest warrant, as Interpol revealed it was only a haphazard request from Nigeria that was not followed by necessary processes to include him on the wanted person’s list on Interpol’s website.

    Since Ibrahim Magu assumed office as acting EFCC boss, he seems to be the only one going after Maina. This is in direct conflict with the attitude of the AGF to Maina. It has come to the point where we need to start asking whether Malami and Magu serve the same principal, or whether the entire country is being played for fools in the president’s theatre of scandals. One thing is certain and that is, Maina’s re-emergence did not occur overnight and members of the president’s team, if not the president himself, may have been in contact with him before now, with the knowledge of his whereabouts.

    As Magu begins doing what he does best – confiscating properties, Maina’s family have claimed that he inherited several houses from his late father. That reminds me of the quantum of foreign currencies allegedly found in an account which Patience Jonathan claimed belongs to her late mother.

    Maina is an archetype of the civil servant in Nigeria whose properties and lifestyle always exceed their means. So, it is not a question of whether he had illegally enriched himself; the fact that he can afford to flee the country whenever he desires, is already a testament to vast means that his civil service rank and stipend, cannot support. He is said to have been living in Dubai. As soon as the spotlight hit him, he should have been done from the civil service forever. So, Malami’s claims hold no water.

    The real questions now are: Why didn’t the EFCC move to confiscate these properties that were being protected with taxpayer’s money before now? Why hasn’t Maina shown his face in public if he believes he is innocent of the allegations? Why are the DSS and EFCC always on opposing sides? And why has President Buhari not corrected the discord between his agencies after several occurrences? Instead of asking whether the president followed due process by directing Maina’s disengagement, we need to be asking these questions as a pattern is forming that is unflattering to the intelligence of the populace.

    Properties, money and other resources have been confiscated in this administration, but ‘heads have not rolled’ as Nigerians are wont to say. One wonders what it will take for a Buhari appointee to be axed in the face of these recurring monumental scandals. One also wonders when the president will borrow a leaf from Truman and start taking responsibility. It is also beyond comprehension how the Jonathan government, again, has somehow been blamed for ‘Mainagate’.

    Will the President wait for another gate to open before he tightens the reins of his presidency? Or will he begin to demonstrate leadership by taking decisive action? There is no telling who exactly the key man to this present ‘gate’ is. But reason points back to the president as another gloss-over of these events will put yet another dent on public confidence in the president’s integrity and leadership ability. This plague of ‘gates’ must stop.

  • Polio: Gates, Dangote sign MoU with governors

    Polio: Gates, Dangote sign MoU with governors

    Bill Gates and Alhaji Aliko Dangote yesterday signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with seven North’s governors to eradicate polio and other diseases.

    The governors of Kaduna, Sokoto, Yobe and Borno entered into the agreement for the first time, while Kano and Bauchi governors had partnered Gates and Dangote under the auspices of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Dangote Foundation.

    Speaking at the event attended by six governors; United States Ambassador to Nigeria James Entwistle; Alhaji Aliko Dangote; Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Sa’ad Abubakar III; Shehu of Borno, Alhaji Abubakar Umar Garbai Elkanemi; Emir of Kano, Alhaji Muhammad Sanusi II, among others, Gates said his foundation was committed to polio eradication.

    He said the foundation, in partnership with the Dangote Foundation and Kano as well as Bauchi states, had  achieved results.

    Entwistle said the U.S. government would support both foundations to end vaccine-preventable child deaths.

    He said under the partnership, they would help Sokoto State to increase and sustain high immunisation coverage.

    The envoy hailed the state governments, saying: “This occasion demonstrates the willingness and commitment of your governments and organisations to tackle the challenges to achieve these goals.”

    Dangote urged the Federal Government to work with the states to provide routine, new vaccines and other items.

    Speaking on behalf of the governors, Kaduna State Governor Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai said although immunising a child should be simple, across the country, the health system was not invested with the capacity to provide routine services at a high standard.

    He, however, hoped the partnership would reverse the trend.

    El-Rufai thanked Gates and Dangote for the partnership  extended to the states.

  • Gates, Dangote raise fund to end polio in Nigeria

    Nigeria is being positioned to eradicate polio next year ahead of, the 2018 deadline by the World Health Organisation (WHO).

    Computer magnate, Bill Gates and formost industralist Aliko Dangote gave this assurance in Lagos in a report of how their collaboration through Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Dangote Foundation had helped polio eradication in the country.

    According to them, total number of polio cases was 112 last year but had dropped to just 51 cases as at this year. “This is through aggressive campaigns, moving from state to state and local government to local government in Nigeria; paying vaccinators to move around and reach kids. Traditional leaders have been fantastic by getting people out to participate in the immunisation exercise.

    “We are rest assured that the battle against polio in the county will be won. Next year we will be celebrating total elimination of polio. Though rejection of the vaccine is a challenge and not the biggest challenge, we are concerned about the virus and how to exterminate same from Nigeria. We are happy to note that Type 3 is no more in Nigeria and Type 1 will be exterminated finally,” they said.

    Dangote said: “My Foundation will be 20 years old next year. It was registered in 1993 but commenced operation in 1994. We are planning to do a big endowment on Education; Health and national relief. We are set to go round the country and not just a locality so many can benefit through the foundation.

    “The Foundation was conceived during the structural adjustment programme (SAP) when many were complaining of the economy problem my business was recording huge successes. I was touched.  So I was inspired to start the Foundation so others can benefit.”

    Gates said he is happy that Nigeria is steadily winning the war against polio. “Many things are happening in Nigeria positively and Dangote is one of such. I and Alhaji Dangote have put together the sum of $6billion to purchase vaccines in a bid to eradicate polio from Nigeria, nay Africa. It would be a wonderful idea to eradicate polio from the whole world,” he said.

  • Toll gates: If this is governance…

    Toll gates: If this is governance…

    While touring the North/South road on Monday, the Minister of Works, Mr Mike Onolemenmen, confirmed to newsmen that the federal government planned to reintroduce tolling on the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway. This was necessary, he said, to “sustain and maintain (the) road so that it would not go back to the sorry state we met it and similar others across the federation.” The tolling would begin as soon as the expressway was reconstructed and expanded by the two firms handling the road work, RCC and Julius Berger, he concluded. But does palliative work lasting eight weeks include expansion work? It is hard to understand the Works minister. In fact, given his garbled statements in the last two weeks on the subject, it is doubtful whether he understands himself.

    After terminating the concession awarded Bi-Courtney Highway Construction Services to reconstruct and expand the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, the government had immediately engaged RCC and Julius Berger to work on the road. It was not until questions were asked about the haste with which a modified form of the road contract was awarded the two construction giants that the government explained that the two-month palliative contract was to make the road motorable for the festive period. Moreover, if the ongoing work by RCC and Julius Berger will last for eight weeks, why would the government begin tolling the road? It will be recalled that part of the agreement with the original concessionaire was to toll the road after reconstructing and expanding it to four lanes to Shagamu and three lanes to Ibadan.

    During his Monday interaction with the media, the Works minister also gave the impression that tolling of roads would not be limited to Lagos-Ibadan Expressway. It is clear the government is confused, if not outrightly dishonest. There is obviously more to the expressway contract than the government is telling the public. Why would the government impose tolls simply because palliative work was done on a road? Is the government jettisoning concession policy? If that is not the goal, then why the haste? Why not wait until new concessionaires emerge, who would determine the appropriate toll fees to collect? In fact, it seems, as the injured Bi-Courtney insinuated after it lost the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway contract, that the concession agreement was intentionally wrapped in multi-layered subterfuge.

    In 2010, the federal government had through an official of the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency (FERMA) announced that tolling would be reintroduced on some federal roads. The plan was to impose about five-per cent road user charge on the pump price of petrol and diesel through which the government could raise about N30bn annually to maintain the nation‘s 220,000 kilometres of roads. Nobody knows the current status of that plan. In 2004, the Olusegun Obasanjo government had attempted a fuel tax of N1.50 on every litre of petrol to raise funds for road maintenance, and had contemptuously presented a fait accompli to the public by summarily dismantling all toll gates. He failed to achieve his aims, though the toll gates were already destroyed.

    Now, in a clearly muddleheaded plan to repair the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, the government has engaged contractors in a deal that is unclear both in scope and objective. If this is not deliberate mischief, it is at least incompetence. At any rate, this is certainly not the way to run a government. The minister must abandon his plans to toll the roads until concessionaires are secured and proper contracts, not palliative agreements, are signed and the destination clear.