Tag: Gaza

  • Gaza: Envoy raises alarmas death toll hits 29,878

    Gaza: Envoy raises alarmas death toll hits 29,878

    The Palestinian Ambassador to Nigeria, Abdullah M. Abu Shawesh has decried that no fewer than 29,878 people have been killed in the ongoing Israeli -Gaza war.

    The envoy who expressed concern over possible famine and outbreak of epidemics in Gaza, told Diplomatic Correspondents over the weekend in Abuja, that 70,215 people have been injured and around 8,000 people still missing under the rubble since the 7 October 2023 siege on Gaza by the Israeli military began.

    He said: “As of yesterday, the death toll in the Gaza Strip was 29,878 martyrs, with 70,215 injuries and around 8,000 people still missing under the rubble.

    Read Also: Gaza cease-fire negotiations: Blinken’s mission impossible

    “The Ministry of Education declared that in the last 144 days, 5427 students were martyred, 5379 in Gaza and 48 in the OWB, while 9193 were injured, 8888 in Gaza and 305 in the occupied West Bank, (OWB), 97 were arrested in the OWB, including East Jerusalem. 255 teachers and administrative staff were martyred and 891 were injured in the Gaza Strip.

    “286 government schools and 65 UN schools were subjected to bombardments and sabotage, with 40 of them destroyed in Gaza, while 57 schools in the OWB were attacked and sabotaged by the IOF. 620,000 students in Gaza are still deprived of the right to learn, while the majority of students are suffering from trauma and facing devastating health situations.”

    He alleged Israel has a hidden agenda, which is to make Gaza inhabitants uncomfortable living in their homeland.

    “The policy is to make Gaza an unlivable place after the war so that even if the inhabitants are not forced to leave under the fire, they will do so voluntarily due to the lack of hospitals, schools, universities, drinkable water, and other necessities for human life.”

  • Gaza cease-fire negotiations: Blinken’s mission impossible

    Gaza cease-fire negotiations: Blinken’s mission impossible

    • By Adam McConnel

    US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s fifth tour of Eastern Mediterranean capitals in the past four months (he now looks a bit haggard) seems to have played out similarly to the previous trips. Though this visit coincided with the hopeful news that Hamas responded positively to current cease-fire proposals and offered their own conditions, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu almost immediately eradicated the budding hopes, continuing his scorched-earth intransigence towards the idea of a negotiated end to the conflict. Reports indicate that the sides continue to discuss conditions.

    Meanwhile, Blinken’s inability to crowbar meaningful compromises out of the Israeli leadership has resurrected the “Is Blinken too nice?” theme from early 2021, when Blinken was tabbed for the job. In an election year, foreign policy has relevance not just to US global leadership; voters are looking closely at whether US President Joe Biden’s administration functions effectively, and in a manner that they support. The Democratic Party’s intergenerational strife, which was damaging but not fatal in 2020, has gained a heated and divisive foreign policy dimension as Generation Z sees the Palestine-Israel conflict in terms that starkly diverge from the Boomer perspective.

    Blinken’s mission impossible

    Blinken’s essential problem is that he has been handed the political equivalent of a “mission impossible.” The Biden administration is affected by several currents that make it extremely difficult — maybe completely unrealistic — for them to pressure the Israeli government in the necessary manner, that is, by threatening to cut off military and/or economic aid, or even taking steps to do so.

    First is the general pro-Israel political mentality and atmosphere in the US, which is embraced almost as strongly by most Democratic Party voters as by Republican Party voters. Biden’s long-standing and rigid support for Israel reflects that reality. Biden may not like Netanyahu, but cutting off aid to Israel seems to be a step that Biden refuses to even contemplate.

    Second is the fact that the US is in an election year, so Biden cannot make any sort of controversial political decisions. Most Americans would be shocked or even infuriated by a move to cut off aid to Israel, which would potentially mean large numbers of lost votes. Former President Donald Trump, who is more likely to be the Republican Party presidential candidate with each passing day, loudly claims an even more aggressively pro-Israel stance. Subsequently, Biden can give no ground on that issue.

    Read Also: Prince William: end Gaza war

    The last important factor is the situation in Congress, which is resolutely pro-Israel, especially those who are up for re-election this fall and whose voting base is not comprised of Generation Z voters, or voters who, for other reasons, support stronger pro-Palestinian policies. Biden is threatening to veto any aid bill that contains aid for Israel but not Ukraine, for example, but the House of Representatives is controlled by Republicans who want to aid Israel but not Ukraine.

    Is true pressure even an option?

    Netanyahu is well aware of the factors enumerated above, and they are why he ignores Blinken’s attempts to pressure him. Even if Blinken were to be “stern” behind closed doors, or if Biden were to “chew out Bibi on the phone,” Netanyahu knows that their hands are tied. Besides feeling righteous in his cause, Netanyahu does not feel any pressure to behave more humanely.

    Without the political will to cut off aid to Israel, Biden and Blinken cannot do much to pressure Netanyahu.

    Even though a nearly unanimous international consensus concerning the need for a Palestinian state has now emerged, and even President Biden publicly supports that goal, Netanyahu remains defiantThus, if the current cease-fire negotiations end up bearing fruit, it will only be because Hamas has fought the Israelis effectively. When Netanyahu claims that victory is “within reach,” I hear echoes of US officials claiming that victory could be achieved in Vietnam, or of the countless rhetorical flourishes used to justify the latest US military initiative in Afghanistan. In the end, it will most likely be Hamas that forces Israel to agree to a cease-fire, not Secretary Blinken talking tough to Prime Minister Netanyahu.

  • Prince William: end Gaza war

    Prince William: end Gaza war

    • Death toll rises to 29,195

    Britain’s Prince William has called for an end to fighting in the Israel-Hamas war, urging increased humanitarian support for Gaza.

    William issued a statement ahead of his visits to recognise the suffering caused by conflict in the Middle East and global rise in anti-Semitism.

    The future king said he was “deeply concerned” about the “terrible human cost” since the Hamas terror attack, and said there was need for increased humanitarian support for Gaza.

    “I remain concerned about the terrible human cost of the conflict in the Middle East since the Hamas terrorist attacked on October 7.

    “Too many have been killed.

    “I, like others, want to see an end to the fighting as soon as possible.’’

    William will meet with aid workers helping to provide humanitarian support.

    Also separately, he joined a synagogue discussion with young people, who were advocates against hatred and anti-Semitism.

    The death toll in the Gaza Strip has risen to 29,195 with 69,170 others injured Gaza-based Health Ministry said yesterday.

    The Israeli army had killed 103 Palestinians and wounded 142 others in the Strip during the past 24 hours, the ministry said in a press statement.

    It was noted that some victims remained under the rubble amid heavy bombardment and a lack of civil defence and ambulance crews.

    Meanwhile, Israeli media outlets said the Israeli army forces were continuing their operations in the north centre and south of the Gaza Strip against Hamas, and have killed many fighters.

    Read Also: U.S. signals plan to block proposed Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN

    The Israeli army announced the death of a 22-year-old soldier as a result of his wounds in the Gaza battles.

    The death of the 22-year-old soldier raised the death toll of Israeli soldiers killed in the ground operation to 236.

    Also, 26 member states of the European Union (EU) yesterday called for an “immediate humanitarian pause that would lead to a sustainable ceasefire” in the besieged Gaza Strip.

    The bloc’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, said at a meeting of EU foreign ministers that all EU countries except Hungary warned Israel against launching an assault on the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

    The EU countries said it would deepen the catastrophe of some 1.5 million refugees crammed into the city.

    “An attack on Rafah would be absolutely catastrophic, it would be unconscionable,” Ireland’s Foreign Minister, Micheal Martin, said before the meeting.

    Israel’s reported plans for an assault on the city have sounded international alarm bells, with many countries urging restraint or cancelation of the operation. 

  • U.S. signals plan to block proposed Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN

    U.S. signals plan to block proposed Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN

    The United States has said it will block another resolution that will soon be presented at the United Nations urging a ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza.

    Algeria has proposed a new resolution be put to a vote on Tuesday at the UN Security Council (UNSC) that seeks an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” between Israel and Hamas, the Palestinian group that governs Gaza, while also demanding an “immediate and unconditional release of all hostages”.

     “Should it come up for a vote as drafted, it will not be adopted,” said U.S. Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield in a statement on Saturday.

    The envoy said the resolution could “run counter” to the goals that Washington says can be achieved through diplomacy in talks between Israel and Hamas that Qatar and Egypt are also mediating.

    A potential agreement, which has been under discussion for weeks, proposes a weeks’ long truce, during which Israeli captives held in Gaza can be exchanged for Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, and more humanitarian aid can enter the besieged Gaza Strip.

    Read Also: Gaza hospital officials missing after being summoned by Israeli forces

    The talks appeared to suffer a setback last week when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Hamas’s demands “ludicrous”, and mediator Qatar has said the discussions have not been promising.

    “The Council has the obligation to ensure that any action we take in the coming days increases pressure on Hamas to accept the proposal on the table,” Thomas-Greenfield said.

    The US has used its veto power to support Israel at the Security Council on dozens of occasions. It has done so several times since the start of the war on October 7, most recently in early December when it vetoed a ceasefire resolution presented by the United Arab Emirates.

    A UNSC resolution was passed in late December, but it was roundly criticised by human rights organisations and others for being a “watered down” version of the original proposal.

    The Algerian proposal for a vote on a new resolution comes amid growing fears that Israel is planning a ground invasion of Rafah in southern Gaza, home to around 1.4 million Palestinians displaced from other parts of the territory since October. Aid agencies and the UN have warned that a ground assault on Rafah could be catastrophic.

  • Brazilian president compares Gaza war to Holocaust

    Brazilian president compares Gaza war to Holocaust

    Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva described yesterday ongoing Israeli attacks on Gaza as “genocide,” comparing it to the acts of Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, according to local media.

    “What’s happening in the Gaza Strip isn’t a war, it’s a genocide,” Brazil’s Canal Gov channel quoted Lula da Silva as saying.

     “What’s happening in the Gaza Strip with the Palestinian people hasn’t happened at any other moment in history. Actually, it has happened: when Hitler decided to kill the Jews,” Lula told reporters in Addis Ababa, where he was attending an African Union summit.

    “It’s not a war of soldiers against soldiers. It’s a war between a highly prepared army and women and children,” he added.

    Israel yesterday criticized Silva for comparing the Israeli war on the Gaza Strip to Hitler’s Holocaust against Jews, with Tel Aviv announcing that it would summon the South American country’s envoy for an official protest today.

    In a statement, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz called da Silva’s statements “shameful” and “serious.”

    “No one will harm Israel’s right to defend itself. I have ordered the people of my office to summon the Brazilian ambassador for a reprimand call tomorrow,” he added on X.

    Read Also: Gaza Strip at my doorstep

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the Brazilian president “crossed a red line.”

     “The words of the president of Brazil are shameful and alarming,” he said in a statement. “This is about trivialising the Holocaust and trying to harm the Jewish people and Israel’s right to defend itself.”

    The Israeli premier argued that Tel Aviv fights for its future “while upholding international law.”

    Israel has pounded the Gaza Strip since an Oct. 7 Hamas attack. The ensuing Israeli attacks have killed nearly 29,000 and caused mass destruction and shortages of necessities, while less than 1,200 Israelis are believed to have been killed in the Hamas attack.

    The Israeli war on Gaza has pushed 85% of the territory’s population into internal displacement amid acute shortages of food, clean water and medicine, while 60% of the enclave’s infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, according to the UN.

    Israel is accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice. An interim ruling in January ordered Tel Aviv to stop genocidal acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.

  • Ireland, Spain call for EU review of Israel’s human rights conduct in Gaza

    Ireland, Spain call for EU review of Israel’s human rights conduct in Gaza

    The prime ministers of Spain and Ireland have asked the European Commission to urgently review whether Israel is complying with its human rights obligations in Gaza as international pressure grows for Israel to hold off on an assault of the densely packed southern border city of Rafah.

    The two leaders said yesterday that attacking Rafah poses “a grave and imminent threat that the international community must urgently confront”.

    “We also recall the horror of October 7, and call for the release of all hostages and an immediate ceasefire that can facilitate access for urgently needed humanitarian supplies,” the prime ministers said in a joint letter published on the Spanish government’s website.

    At least 1,139 Israelis were killed and about 240 people were taken captive in a raid by Hamas fighters on southern Israel on October 7, prompting Israel to unleash its most brutal offensive yet on the besieged territory.

     At least 28,576 Palestinians have since been killed in Israeli attacks, the Ministry of Health in Gaza said yesterday, mostly women and children.

    Spain and Ireland have been particularly outspoken on the topic of Israel’s assault on Gaza in comparison with other European Union states.

    But a Spanish government source told the Reuters news agency that it was confident that European countries are unifying around a firmer position and for the European Commission to take more concrete action over Israel’s actions in Gaza.

    The source pointed to a tweet on Tuesday by Alexander De Croo, the prime minister of Belgium, which said any Rafah operation could generate an “unmitigated humanitarian catastrophe”. Belgium at present holds the presidency of the European Council.

     German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock also said before talks scheduled with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that an offensive on Rafah would jeopardise the humanitarian situation there.

     While only Spain and Ireland signed the letter, the source said it expected further backing for a review when ministers meet for the Council of Europe in March.

     Their intervention follows South Africa’s referral of Israel to the International Court of Justice over allegations it is committing genocide.

     The European Commission confirmed receipt of the letter and said it would “look into it”, spokeswoman Arianna Podesta told reporters.

    “We do urge all sides when it comes to Israel to respect international law, and we note that there must be respect, there must be accountability for violations of international law,” the spokesperson said.

    Read Also: Gaza Strip at my doorstep

    Two weeks ago, Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said he was in talks with other EU heads of government to review the EU-Israel Association Agreement on the basis that Israel may be breaching the agreement’s human rights clause.

    The 23-year-old agreement sets out a framework for free trade in goods, services and capital based on “respect for human rights and democratic principles”.

    Varadkar said several EU states were also talking about a possible joint recognition of a Palestinian state.

    More than 1.4 million displaced Palestinians are currently trapped in Rafah as Israeli troops prepare for a full-scale ground operation that has triggered international alarm over the potential for mass casualties. Most of those in Rafah fled there after the Israeli army designated it a “safe zone”.

    With an influx of desperate people and a lack of clean water, food, medicine and other basic supplies, disease is also flourishing.

    Israeli tanks have already shelled parts of Rafah over the past few days, causing waves of panic. Dozens of Palestinians were killed in overnight attacks on Monday, and on Tuesday, two journalists, including an Al Jazeera Arabic correspondent, were seriously wounded.

    Thousands have started to flee the area to Deir el-Balah in central Gaza as much of the enclave has been turned into ruins.

  • Gaza hospital officials missing after being summoned by Israeli forces

    Gaza hospital officials missing after being summoned by Israeli forces

    Two officials at Al Amal Hospital in southern Gaza are missing after being “summoned” by the Israeli military yesterday, the Palestine Red Crescent Society said.

    The summons came as hundreds of displaced people who sought shelter at the society’s hospital and the adjacent headquarters in Khan Younis began leaving after a two-week siege by Israeli forces, the PRCS said in a post on X.

    The PRCS said Dr Haidar Al Qudra, general manager of the hospital, and its administrative director, Maher Atallah, had been taken to an unknown location.

    “This follows the ICRC [International Committee of the Red Cross] informing PRCS of occupation approval for a safe passage, enabling displaced individuals to leave Al Amal Hospital and PRCS headquarters towards Mawasi in Khan Younis,” it said.

    Thousands of civilians have been fleeing to the coastal town of Al Mawasi, near Khan Younis, and to the city of Rafah, further south, after weeks of intense Israeli bombardment and ground fighting against Palestinian militants in the city.

    People trapped at the Al Amal Hospital had begun burying victims of Israeli attacks in the hospital grounds because they were unable to leave the compound.

    The death toll in Gaza from nearly four months of Israel’s offensive has reached 27,478 people, with 66,835 injured, the enclave’s health ministry said on Monday. About another 8,000 are missing.

    Israel launched strikes and a ground offensive in Gaza after Hamas militants attacked Israeli communities on October 7, killing about 1,200 people and abducting 240.

    Read Also: When the war in Gaza stops, the political war in Israel will begin

    Overnight, at least 128 people were killed in Gaza in Israeli attacks.

    Israel’s military bombarded Deir Al Balah in central Gaza, Khan Younis and areas leading to Rafah.

    Some 1.9 million out of Gaza’s 2.2 million population are now crammed into the Rafah area, the Gaza Health Ministry and the Palestinian state news agency Wafa reported.

    An Israeli air strike on a home in Al Hakar neighbourhood of Deir Al Balah killed 14 people, reported the agency.

    In Gaza city, Israeli soldiers set fire to homes in the Burj Al Sousi area, it added.

    Israeli media reported last week that Israeli soldiers were under direct orders to raze homes they occupied.

    The Israeli offensive has created a humanitarian crisis as displaced people struggle with food shortages and winter cold.

    Many are reliant on food handouts from charity kitchens, queuing in wet, cold weather.

  • When the war in Gaza stops, the political war in Israel will begin

    When the war in Gaza stops, the political war in Israel will begin

    • By Yaakov Katz

    The raid by Israeli special forces on Tuesday morning of the Ibn Sina Hospital in Jenin legitimately made international headlines. In a video caught by the hospital security cameras, a group of Israeli commandos, disguised as Palestinians – some wearing headscarves, white medical coats, and nurses’ uniforms – are seen pacing the corridor with drawn assault rifles.

    Within 10 minutes, the commandos were back outside after eliminating three top Hamas terrorists said to have been in the midst of planning an October 7-style attack somewhere in the West Bank.

    But beyond the Hollywood-like drama of the operation, there is something more important to take away from it – what the IDF did that morning is a perfect illustration of the type of security reality Israel seeks to create in the Gaza Strip.

    It shows how, 22 years after Operation Defensive Shield, which saw the IDF return to Palestinian cities during the Second Intifada, the Israeli military continues to retain operational freedom and enter and operate in the West Bank when it deems it to be necessary.

    This is ultimately what Israel is looking to achieve in the Gaza Strip. Despite earlier declarations – according to which the IDF would destroy and eradicate Hamas – Israel understands today that this is not possible. Instead, it is focused on what seems like more modest goals of freeing the hostages, toppling the Hamas leadership, and creating a new security reality in southern Israel. What will make this possible is the ability to continue operating inside Gaza as needed.

    A victory in the way that we tend to think is not possible in this conflict. While Hamas can be toppled and the hostages returned, there will still not be a decisive victory. In a battle against terrorist groups like Hamas, there rarely is a victory in the Western sense. There can be a story about a victory, but the true win is creating a new security reality and being able to operate inside Gaza as the IDF operates in Jenin and elsewhere in the West Bank.

    THE BEGINNING of this new stage might be coming soon, based on reports coming out of Qatar, according to which a new hostage deal might be imminent and could lead to a reduction in Israeli forces in Gaza.

    Israel’s political war will begin

    In that case, while the large-scale portion of the war will be over inside Gaza, it will only be starting in Israel, where a deal will represent not just the end of the high-intensity stage, but also the point that Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot will likely withdraw from the coalition and begin calling for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to step down.

    Gantz and Eisenkot will be able to say that they stayed in the government to secure the release of the hostages and to see the war through until the end of the ground offensive. Now that Israel is focused on the post-war operations that will continue for years, they can pull out and go back to being the opposition to Netanyahu that they used to be.

    This will be the beginning of a new battle that will erupt in Israel, one that will be about Netanyahu’s political survival and whether he can succeed in staying in office. The ceasefire – whether temporary or indefinite – will also be the point when the protests will explode in a way that Israel has not seen before. It will be of a new scale and scope, one that could lead to mass public disturbances like the rallies around the legislation of the Reasonableness Bill last year that saw entire cities blocked for days. Protest leaders promise that those protests will be nothing compared to what is coming.

    People will vent their anger – at the government, at Netanyahu, at the years of neglect, and at the IDF. What Netanyahu does will determine what happens next, but the thought that protests, which he will immediately portray as being led by the Left, will be what gets him to step down is mistaken.

    Netanyahu’s options will be limited, but he will have options. His instinct will be to depict the protesters as left-wing and try to steer the conversation away from the October 7 failures and instead move it to a question of Right vs Left and who does the public want to see rule this country. This might buy time, but that alone is unlikely to be enough to stop the protests.

    Read Also: Like scenes from Gaza

    To take the air out of the protests, he will need to show the public that he is paying a price. He has two ways to do that. The first will be by appointing a state commission of inquiry, something he has never done in all his years as Israel’s prime minister. He might try to create a government-appointed committee that he can better control and could then pretend to succumb to public pressure by giving the protesters a state-appointed commission, one that is stronger and more independent.

    THIS IS what Ehud Olmert did in 2006 after the Second Lebanon War. Then, protesters took up positions outside the Prime Minister’s Office and demanded that Olmert resign and establish a state commission. He first set up a government committee to be led by a former head of the Mossad, but when the protests continued, he gave into the demand to have a state commission of inquiry, a move that ultimately took the air out of the protests.

    Netanyahu could try to do the same, although this time it will be hard to see how a commission of inquiry will be enough to stop the protests. Today, the public anger is at a whole different level than it was in 2006. Therefore, Netanyahu might have to do more, like announcing new elections.

    The way Netanyahu might do this is by giving people a few weeks to vent and then – after the commission stunt – announce that he has heard the people and has decided to move up elections to sometime in the summer, like in July or August. He will explain that, anyhow, it takes about six months to hold an election, and therefore the summer makes sense.

    The strategy here will be twofold. On the one hand, initiating a new election will reduce the intensity of the public protests and it will give people a feeling that their actions have paid off. Once elections are called, why would they need to continue protesting?

    The second reason is to create some distance between October 7 and the election. He wants people to move away from the disasters and failures – led by his policies – and focus on other issues once the summer comes along and they need to vote. What other issues? A Palestinian state is one example and his opposition, as well as normalization with the Saudis, which he will try to put back on track.

    Israel is heading into a complicated period that will test this country in new ways. A ceasefire might end the high-intensity offensive in Gaza, but for some, the real battle is just beginning.

    • This article was first published in www.jpost.com
  • Like scenes from Gaza

    Like scenes from Gaza

    Without captions, the television pictures, videos and still photographs seem at first blush  like scenes from Gaza, evoking the merciless, round-the-clock bombing that has reduced that enclave to rubble. 

    Homes obliterated, with the windows and doors of those that were still standing totally shot; a once-thriving community reduced to a scorched landscape of smouldering carcasses of cars and deformed remains of household objects; vehicles upturned and balanced delicately on large plastic water tanks. 

    Mangled remains of roofs, fixtures and fittings strewn all over the place.   Whatever was not obliterated was hurled out of place or bent out of shape.

    But that locale was several thousand miles removed from Gaza.  Nor was it even a theatre of war, recent or ongoing.

    The locale is the Old Bodija area of Africa’s largest city, Ibadan, the setting of arguably the most productive exercise in self-government that fell just a tad short of sovereign rule ever conducted in any colony in the British Empire.         

    Read Also: Tinubu explains reasons for cabinet size

    The genteel, upper-middle-class suburb has retained its character and defied the intrusion of hot new money and crass elements of urban sprawl and is home to some of the most accomplished retired and serving elements of Nigeria’s professional class – university professors, judges, lawyers, military officers, political leaders. retired public servants, technocrats, and cultural figures.

    A house gutted by fire here, and a storm-damaged home there:  that was just about all that all you would expect in Old Bodija.  You had little reason to suspect that it would be the epicentre of the massive blast that tore through that section of Ibadan last Tuesday and was felt miles away.

    Most residents, unless obligated by the terms of their mortgage, probably reckoned that they had little to gain, and probably a vital chunk of their income to lose, by insuring their property.

    The fortunate among them are being treated for their injuries or are counting their losses.  The less fortunate lost everything.  Now refugees in the twilight of their eventful and productive years, they have become wards of their children,  their relations, and the public health system. 

    A week ago today, at about 8 pm, local time, an explosion of elemental proportions ripped through Old Bodija and the surrounding areas, sending residents scurrying out of their homes for safety, leaping over or sidestepping the jagged remains of objects that had defined and structured their lives.

    Going by the accounts of law enforcement officials and first responders, five persons were killed and 75 injured in the mayhem.  If this is true, Providence must have supervened.   Only that could have accounted for these figures, given that no fewer than 50 residential homes were obliterated. And in a city where most residents are home by late evening, the figures could have been much higher.

    I suspect that the casualty figures will rise when salvage vehicles lift the collapsed beams and pillars and emergency workers sift through the rubble. 

    There has been no accounting for the missing.  Some indication of the number should emerge when traumatized residents recover sufficiently to step forward to file their concerns.  But do not expect a comprehensive or even reliable accounting.  We do not keep vital records here.

    Officials have been saying that the last was triggered by explosives stored by a mining company with business offices in the neighbourhood.  This explanation raises several questions.

    For how long have the explosives been in storage?  Who owns the house in which they were stored?  Who are the registered owners or proprietors of the mining company?  Was the facility authorized to carry on that kind of business in the locale?  If so, by whom?  Was it subject to periodic inspection to ascertain the condition of the explosives?

    Regardless of the answers, the existence of the explosives in that location constitutes a twin failure of intelligence and security, and a clear and present danger to lives and public safety.

    Some analysts have questioned the official account.  According to them, one solitary, thunderous bang from a single source must have caused the devastation.  There were no secondary explosions and no chain reaction, the type that would have occurred if one exploding package had ignited the next package, and the next,

    It was just one huge, convulsive bang, and then, silence.

    To produce the effect reported in Old Bodija, a single object packed with explosives would have had to be detonated, most likely by remote control, the analysts are saying.  In short, only a bomb could have caused the devastation.

    Their explanation may, to many of our jaded compatriots, smack of the conspiracy theories being injected into public discourse each passing day to account for the angst and the disequilibrium in society. 

    But it is worth examining.  Indeed, to get to the root of the matter, every theorem should be examined carefully.

    Days after the blast, the Malian entrepreneur officials identified as the head of a mining syndicate in Old Bodija and his local confederates are yet to be apprehended.

    Forensic evidence that could help determine the origin, manufacturer and properties of the blast instrument lay strewn all over the place and was trampled on repeatedly.  By now, it would have been compromised irredeemably.

    The watch was desultory.  They fenced off the immediate perimeter, but only the fear of being caught up in a secondary blast or being whipped kept the motor park crowd and gawkers and those hunting for items of immediate value at bay.

    Skillful deployment of heavy equipment to facilitate the search for persons who might have been trapped under the rubble was rather tardy.  Minutes can spell the difference between life and death when incidents like the Bodija blast occur.

    Given the poor record of law-enforcement agencies and the courts in matters relating to crime and punishment, a special prosecutor with powers of subpoena will have to be appointed to conduct the investigations into the blast under the aegis of a commission of inquiry.  It will conduct its hearings in public, and its findings, less material that could compromise public safety and security, should be published.

    That is the best way to ensure that the matter is not swept into the musty cabinets of the bureaucracy nor spun into another “inconclusive” narrative.  This is no occasion to create an illusion of momentum.

    The authorities must rise to the challenge of rehabilitating the victims of the blast, especially those who served Nigeria to the best of their ability, often going beyond the call of duty.

  • South Africa to ICJ: Israel officials support Gaza destruction

    South Africa to ICJ: Israel officials support Gaza destruction

    South Africa has told the International Court of Justice that Israel’s plan to “destroy” Gaza comes from “the highest level of state”.

     The claims were made by South African lawyers as it presented its case accusing Israel of genocide at the United Nations top court.

     South Africa also called on the court to order Israel to cease military operations in Gaza.

     Israel which will present its defence today vehemently rejected the accusations, describing it as “baseless”.

     The court will deliver only an opinion on the genocide allegation, although it is being closely watched.

     A lawyer for the High Court of South Africa, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, told the ICJ that Israel’s “genocidal intent” was evident “from the way in which this military attack is being conducted”.

     “The intent to destroy Gaza has been nurtured at the highest level of state,” he said.

     Adila Hassim, also representing South Africa, told the court: “Every day there is mounting, irreparable loss of life, property, dignity, and humanity for the Palestinian people. Nothing will stop the suffering, except an order from this court.”

     In its evidence submitted before the hearing, South Africa said Israel’s actions were “intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group”.

     Israel said its actions in the Gaza Strip are justified because it is responding to Hamas’s deadly attacks on 7 October.

    Read Also: Fed Govt alerts Nigerians to meningitis outbreak

    South Africa’s Justice Minister, Ronald Lamola said that no attack “can provide justification for or defend breaches of the [Genocide] Convention”.

      Israel is a signatory to the Genocide Convention of 1948, which defines genocide and commits states to prevent it.

      The ICJ is the United Nation’s highest court, based in The Hague in the Netherlands. Its rulings are theoretically legally binding on parties to the ICJ which include Israel and South Africa but are not enforceable.

      In 2022, the court ordered Russia to “immediately suspend military operations” in Ukraine, an order that was ignored.

     Under international law, genocide is defined as committing one or more acts to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.

      There were angry scenes outside the ICJ’s building, known as the Peace Palace, as Dutch police struggled to keep groups of Palestinian and Israeli supporters apart.

      Hundreds of people waving Palestinian flags gathered outside the ICJ, calling for a ceasefire. Israeli supporters set up a screen showing images of some of the hostages still being held in Gaza.